site reclamation cost estimate for plant located in metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. site...

89
opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0 June 2000 Prepared for: Honeywell Metropolis, Illinois Prepared by. GTS Duratek Radiological Engineering and Field Services 628 Gallaher Rd. Kingston, TN 37763

Upload: others

Post on 08-Jul-2020

9 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

opý

10.

Site Reclamation Cost Estimatefor Plant Located inMetropolis, Illinois

Revision 0

June 2000

Prepared for:HoneywellMetropolis, Illinois

Prepared by.GTS Duratek

Radiological Engineeringand Field Services

628 Gallaher Rd.Kingston, TN 37763

Page 2: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

HONEYWELL

Site Reclamation Cost Estimatefor Plant Located inMetropolis, Illinois

Revision 0June 2000

Prepared by:

Reviewed by:

Approved by:

Pau C.Ely •f

Principal Radiologicý/Engineer

Robert HombeckOperations Manager,Radiological Engineering and Field Services

Date 6&k/o

Date _"__,,-___

Date 00Roafi ShultM6ager, ByproductsRadiological Engineering and Field Services

Prepared By:GTS Duratek

Radiological Engineering and Field Services628 Gallaher RoadKingston, TN 37763

Page 3: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Radiological Engineering and Field Services division of GTS Duratek, Inc., has providedan independent cost estimate for the site reclamation of the Honeywell Plant located inMetropolis, Illinois. This estimate was prepared at the request of Honeywell to provide for anindependent estimate for financial assurance purposes. This cost estimate was developed usinga systematic approach. Release levels were identified and historical contamination data for thisfacility was reviewed. A site characterization survey was not performed. Specific and generalinformation regarding equipment and structures was used in determining decontamination anddemolition methodologies in order to minimize overall decommissioning costs.

This estimate includes itemized costs for manpower and equipment resources, radioactivewaste volume reduction, packaging, shipping and burial activities, and the performance of finalstatus surveys for buildings and structures. The estimated decommissioning cost is$99,535,489 in terms of 2000 dollars. This estimate is for budgetary purposes only and is nota proposal for GTS Duratek, Inc., to perform the decommissioning work.

A significant portion of the overall decommissioning costs is attributed to the processing orburial of radioactive waste. The radioactive waste disposal rate used for most of the waste inthis estimate was based on shipping to Envirocare of Utah and upon negotiating a favorablerate with Envirocare of Utah based on a large waste volume and low levels of activity. Theremay be another opportunity to dispose of this waste as 1 l(e)(2) material, defined in Section11(e) of the Atomic Energy Act as the tailings or wastes produced by the extraction orconcentration of uranium or thorium from any ore processed primarily for its source materialcontent. The cost for disposal of wastes at a facility authorized to accept 11 (e)(2) materialcould be significantly less than for a facility licensed to accept regular radioactive wastes under1OCRF61. The cost for disposal of the calcium fluoride pond sediment was based on disposalunder 1 I(e)(2) regulations.

ii Revision 0

Page 4: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPRIETARY STATEMENT .............................................................EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................... iTABLE OF CONTENTS.....................................................................iii

LIS OF APPEND)ICES...................................................................... ivLIST OF FIGUTRES .......................................................................... ivLIST OF TABLES ............................................................................ v

1.0 INTRODUCTION........................................................................... 1-11.1 Purpose................................................................................ 1-11.2 Scope................................................................................... 1-11.3 Assumptions and Bases............................................................. 1-2

2.0 GENERAL FACILITY DESCRIPTION................................................. 2-12.1 Main Production Buildings........................................................ 2-32.2 Miscellaneous Production Buildings.............................................. 2-32.3 Drum Storage Pads &.Ponds ...................................................... 2-42.4 Outdoor Areas, Drains & Sewers ................................................. 2-42.5 Administrative Areas ............................................................... 2-42.6 Calcium Fluoride Ponds............................................................ 2-4

3.0 RADIOLOGICAL CONDITIONS........................................................ 3-13.1 Radionuclides of Concern .......................................................... 3-13.2 Radiological Criteria for License Termination.................................. 3-13.3 Characterization Data.............................................................. 3-53.4 Main Production Buildings....................................................... 3-103.5 Miscellaneous Production Buildings ............................................ 3-103.6 Drum Storage Pads & Ponds..................................................... 3-103.7 Outdoor Areas, Drains & Sewers................................................ 3-103.8 Administrative Areas.............................................................. 3-10-3.9 Calcium Fluoride Ponds .......................................................... 3-11

4.0 ESTIM4ATION METHODS................................................................ 4-14.1 Cost Modifying Factors ............................................................ 4-14.2 Radwaste Volume Estimates....................................................... 4-54.3 Radwaste Disposal Costs........................................................... 4-54.4 Remediation Methods .............................................................. 4-6

iii Revision 0

Page 5: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

TABLE OF CONTENTS

4.5 Radwaste Volume Reduction Costs ............................................... 4-74.6 Unit Costs ............................................................................ 4-84.7 Final Surveys......................................................................... 4-9

5.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE DECOMMISSIONING SCENARIO ...................... 5-15.1 Characterization Survey............................................................ 5-15.2 Remediation.......................................................................... 5-15.3 License Termination Surveys...................................................... 5-5

6.0 REFERENCES ......................................................6-1

LIST OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX A- 1 Contaminated Waste Volume Summary ........................................ 1..APPENDIX A- 2 Contaminated Waste Disposal Cost................................................ 2APPENDIX A- 3 Waste Shipping Container Cost .................................................... 3APPENDIX A- 4 Waste Disposal Labor Estimate .................................................... 4APPENDIX A- 5 Building Area Survey Cost Estimate............................................... 5APPENDIX A- 6 Outdoor Area Survey Labor Summary ............................................ 6APPENDIX A- 7 Radioactive Waste Disposal Charge Schedule .................................... 7APPENDIX A- 8 Instrument Lease Charges .......................................................... 8APPENDIX A- 9 Equipment Lease Charges .......................................................... 9APPENDIX A- 10 Demolition Estimate .............................................................. 10APPENDIX A- I1I Volume Reduction Costs........................................................11APPENDIX A- 12 Decontamination Costs ..................................................... 12APPENDIX A- 13 Equipment Inventory ............................................................. 13APPENDIX A- 14 Soil Waste Volume............................................................... 14

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 2-1 Honeywell Facility..................................... 2-5Figure 2-2 Plan of Honeywell Facility .............................. ....... ...... 2-6Figure 3-1 Honeywell Uncontrolled Area Survey Data .................. 3-6Figure 3-2 Honeywell Controlled Area Survey Data ........... .......... 3-7Figure 3-3 Honeywell Environmental Soil Sample Data ........ .............. 3-8Figure 3-4 Honeywell Environmental Mud Sample Data......................................... .3-9

iv iv Revision 0

Page 6: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF TABLES

Table 3-1: Acceptable Surface Contamination Levels ........................................................ 3-3Table 3-2: Interim Screening Values' (pCi/g) of Common Radionuclides for Soil Surface

C ontam ination Levels .................................................................................................. 3-4Table 4-1: Decommissioning Cost Summary - Honeywell Facility ................................... 4-1Table 4-2 Personnel Protective Equipment Protection Summary ....................................... 4-2Table 4-3: Hazardous and Toxic Waste Productivity Factors: Light Work ......................... 4-3Table 4-4: Hazardous and Toxic Waste Productivity Factors: Heavy Work ........................ 4-4Table 4-5: Honeywell Unprocessed Radioactive Waste Summary .................................... 4-5Table 4-6: Decontaminhation Methodology Comparison ..................................................... 4-7Table 4-7: Volume Reduction Methodology Cost Information .......................................... 4-8Table 4-8: Decommissioning Estimate Selected Unit Cost Factors .................................... 4-9Table 5-1: Planned Rem ediation Activities ........................................................................ 5-2Table 5-2: Typical Final Survey Instrumentation ............................................................... 5-5

V Revision 0

Page 7: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

INTRODUCTION

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Purpose-

The Radiological Engineering and Field Services (RE&FS) .division of GTS Duratek(GTSD) has prepared this document for the purpose of providing a cost estimate for sitereclamation of the Honeywell Plant located in Metropolis, Illinois. This estimate wasprepared to provide for an independent estimate for financial assurance purposes.

The estimate includes only activities and cost factors necessary to reduce residualradioactivity to levels that will permit release of the associated structures, buildings andgrounds for unrestricted use.

Costs associated with the demolition and removal of non-contaminated equipment orstructures are not included in this cost estimate unless such activities are required tosupport decommissioning. An actual date to perform the site reclamation has not beenprojected. The cost estimate provided by this report is in terms of 2000 dollars.

1.2 Scope

The scope of this report is to present the estimated costs derived for site reclamation ofthe Metropolis Plant. The specific areas covered by this estimate include:

• Feed Materials Building• ION Exchange Building* Sodium Removal Building* KOH Mud's Building* Uranium Recovery Building0 FM Building Pads* Sample Plant0 Ore Storage Building* Bed Material Filter Fines Building* Pond Mud's Filter Calciner Building* Cylinder Wash Building* Drum Crusher Building* Fluorine Plant• Liquid Fluorine and Nitrogen Facilities0 Calcium Fluoride Building* Administrative Areas0 Ore Storage Pads* KOH Mud's Storage Pad• Waste Storage Pad

1-1 Revision 0

Page 8: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

INTRODUCTION

* Settling Ponds* Drains & Sewers* Calcium Fluoride Ponds• Outdoor Areas• Discharge Ditch to River

Decommissioning costs are directly related to the degree of remediation required andthe amount of radioactive waste generated. The extent of remediation is based onradiological data, proven decontamination processes and data from similar projects.The volume and weight of radioactive waste was estimated based on data obtained fromsite drawings, vendor documents, and direct measurements in the facility.

1.3. Assumptions and Bases

The following assumptions and bases were utilized in developing the cost estimate.

Some of the older more contaminated buildings will be removedcompletely. The office buildings, and other buildings with minimal orno contamination. will remain in place after decommissioning. They willbe decontaminated if required and free released but they will not berefurbished if required to make them useable.

Uncontaminated processing equipment can have high intrinsic values andwill be utilized at another location or sold during decommissioning.There was no cost included for decommissioning this equipment and nosalvage value credit taken for this equipment.

Contaminated equipment will be decontaminated on site, processed at avolume reduction facility prior to disposal, or sent directly to a licensedradioactive material disposal site. The waste processing facility isassumed to be the GTS Duratek facility located 295 miles away in OakRidge, Illinois.

Radioactive waste with low specific activity will be sent to Envirocare ofUtah. It was assumed that partially decontaminated equipment,protective clothing wastes, removed concrete, miscellaneous DAW andsoil would qualify for disposal at Envirocare of Utah.

Radioactive waste not suitable for disposal at Envirocare of Utah can besent to the Barnwell, South Carolina disposal site. However, all wastequalified for disposal at Envirocare of Utah under their current licenseand waste acceptance criteria.

1-2 Revision 0

Page 9: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

INTRODUCTION

The site remediation contractor will provide most of the demolitionequipment and survey instrumentation at prevailing rates.

Local decontamination technicians and supervisors will be utilized tostaff this project and no travel and living funds are included for them.Health Physics technicians and supervisors and project managementpersonnel will not be local hires and funds for travel and living expenseswere included.

* Construction labor rates were obtained from 2000 RS Means BuildingConstruction Cost Data for Paducah, Kentucky.

1-3 Revision 0

Page 10: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

GENERAL FACILITY DESCRIPTION

2.0 GENERAL FACILITY DESCRIPTION

The Honeywell Plant is located on U.S. Highway 45 approximately 1.8 miles northwest ofdowntown Metropolis, Illinois. The plant and Metropolis are both situated on the north bankof the Ohio River. The Honeywell property consists of an 862-acre tract bounded on thesouthwest by the Ohio River and by U.S. Highway 45 on the northeast. A section of thesoutheast property boundary is contiguous with the town limits of Metropolis. The restrictedarea containing the plant occupies an area or about 31.6-acre site within the property boundaryas shown in Figure 2-1. The plant contains about 20 principal buildings, including anadministration building and a laboratory. It also includes five large settling basins for whichretain the calcium fluoride sludge and two small settling and treatment ponds

Major site facilities include the administration building, the laboratory, the fluoride productionfacility, the UF6 manufacturing facility, the waste treatment plant, and a large UF6 cylinderstorage area.

The Metropolis plant was designed to convert uranium ore concentrates into uraniumhexafluoride, which is then shipped to U.S. and foreign plants for enrichment of the 235Uisotope. The facility, which uses the fluoride volatility process, has the capacity to convertapproximately 14,000 tons of uranium per year from ore concentrates into UF6. The oreconcentrates feed assays approximately 75% uranium, and the distilled UF 6 product containsless than 300-ppm impurities.

The plant receives uranium ore concentrates in 55-gal drums. Each drum of ore concentrate isweighed and then stored on storage pads until accountability procedures and the uranium andimpurity analyses are completed.

Some ore concentrates and all uranium compounds from the uranium recovery process containundesirable amounts of contaminants, principally sodium, that must be removed. Thepretreatment consists of a four-stage countercurrent decantation treatment with ammoniumsulfate solution. The uranium solids discharge into the ore calciner in the ore preparation area.

Incoming ore concentrates are charged into the system through a drum-dumping station. Theconcentrates either go directly to the calciner or through the pretreatment area to the calciner.Following the calciner, the ore concentrates are blended, agglomerated, dried, crushed, andsized to a uniform particle size. Dusts and fumes from this process are controlled by a seriesof dust collectors.

The sized U30, enters a fluid-bed reactor termed the reductor. In the reductor the uranium isreduced to the dioxide form utilizing hydrogen and nitrogen as the fluidizing gas, which isobtained from the dissociation of ammonia. The reductor off-gas (principally hydrogen,

2-1 Revision 0

Page 11: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

GENERAL FACILITY DESCRIPTION

nitrogen, water vapor, and hydrogen sulfide) is passed through filters to remove particulateuranium, and the residual gas is incinerated to convert the H2S to SO 2.

The uranium dioxide from the reductor is fed into two fluid-bed hydrofluorinators operated inseries. A countercurrent flow of anhydrous HF fluidizing gas converts the uranium dioxideinto uranium tetrafluoride (UF4). The off-gas is filtered to remove particulate uranium andscrubbed with water and potassium hydroxide solution to remove HF before being vented tothe atmosphere. The HF scrubber liquors are neutralized, and the fluoride is removed beforebeing discharged with the main plant effluent.

The UF4 is fed into two parallel fluid-bed fluorinators that also contain inert bed material.Elemental fluorine used as the fluidizing gas converts the UF4 to UF6 that is volatilized fromthe fluorinators. Residual uranium and nonvolatile uranium daughter products remain in thebed material, which is recycled and reused until the buildup of contaminant levels prohibitfurther use. The bed material is then retired for radioactive decay and recovery of the uraniumcontent. The volatilized gas containing UF6, excess fluorine, and HF is passed through aseries of filters for particulate removal and through a series of cold traps for UF6 collection.

The bulk of the UF6 is condensed in a series of primary cold traps that are operated atapproximately -20'F. The secondary and tertiary traps operate at lower temperatures andremove the residual UF6. Following liquefaction crude UF6 is removed intermittently fromthe cold traps by heating and is then transferred to still feed tanks to await purification byfractional distillation.

Uncondensed gas from the cold traps consisting of F2, HF, air, and traces of UF6 is passedthrough scrubbers where contact with aqueous potassium hydroxide solution removes fluoridesand traces of uranium prior to release to the atmosphere.

The potassium diuranate precipitated in the off-gas scrubbers is settled from the KOH solutionand transferred to the uranium recovery facility for recovery of contained uranium. Thescrubbing solutions are processed for regeneration of KOH that is subsequently reused in theprocess scrubbers.

Crude UF6 from the still feed tanks is fed into a low boiler distillation column. The UF6 thathas been stripped of low-boiling impurities is then fed into a high boiler distillation columnwhere high-boiling impurities are eliminated. The product is condensed and packaged into 10-ton' or 14-ton cylinders that are shipped to gaseous diffusion plants. There are no off-gasesfrom this process.

Potassium diuranate from the cold trap off-gas cleanup system, fluorinator filter fines,contaminated fluorinator bed material, miscellaneous recovered dust, and scrap ore are finely

2-2 Revision 0

Page 12: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

GENERAL FACILITY DESCRIPTION

ground and leached with a sodium carbonate solution to solubilize the uranium as thetricarbonate complex. The leached material is filtered, and the insoluble material (principallyinorganic fluoride containing residual uranium and uranium daughter products) is dried anddrummed for disposal at a licensed radioactive waste disposal facility. The uranium in thefiltrate is precipitated with NaOH; the recovered uranium is then charged to the head end ofthe process via the pretreatment facility.

The uranium recovery leach liquors are recycled to permit reuse. Less than 10% of theseliquors are withdrawn, treated, and then discharged into the plant effluent.

Periodically, UF6 product cylinders, must be washed and pressure tested to assure designintegrity. The cylinders are washed with sodium carbonate solution to leach the uranium fromthe residual solids. The leach liquors are then filtered to remove the unleached solids andtransferred to the uranium recovery facility.. The remaining solids containing daughterproducts of uranium principally 234Th and 234Pa, are stored onsite in drums and areeventually disposed of at a licensed waste disposal facility.

Fluorine, which is one of the raw materials required for the UF6 process, is produced onsiteby electrolysis using hydrogen fluoride as the source. A portion of this material is transferredto the UF6 operation, and the remainder is used to produce materials that are soldcommercially.

2.1 Main Production Buildings

The Main Production Buildings include the Feed Materials Building, the FeedsMaterials Building Pads, the Ion Exchange Building, the Sodium Removal Building, theKOH Mud's Building, the Uranium Recovery Building, and the Sample Plant. Thesebuildings incorporate the primary processing activities as listed above.

2.2 Miscellaneous Production Buildings

The Miscellaneous Production Buildings include the Ore Storage Building, the BedMaterial Filter Fines Building, the Pond Mud's Filter Calciner Building, the CylinderWash Building, the Drum Crusher Building, the GF2 Plant Building, the South GF2Plant, the SF6/IF5/SbF5 Building, the Liquid Fluorine Facility, the Liquid NitrogenFacility, and the Calcium Fluoride Building. These building incorporate supportprocesses for the uranium processing facilities above and non-uranium processingactivities.

2.3 Drum Storage Pads & Ponds

2-3 Revision 0

Page 13: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

GENERAL FACILITY DESCRIPTION

The Drum Storage Pads & Ponds include the five (5) Ore Storage Pads, the KOH MudsStorage Pad, the Waste Storage Pad, and Settling Ponds #3 and #4.

2.4 Outdoor Areas, Drains & Sewers

The Outdoor Areas, Drains and Sewers include the Employee Parking Lot, the pavedroads on site, the Railroad spurs #1 through #4, the land between two parallel propertyexclusion fences, the company owned land outside the fenced property, the DischargeDitch to River, the UF6 Cylinder Storage Area, the Long Term Cylinder Storage Area,site drains, site sewers, and all other land inside fenced area.

The Discharge Ditch handles the discharge from several sources. The effluent streamfrom the calcium fluoride settling basins has a pH of approximately 12 and isautomatically adjusted to, a pH of approximately 8 using H2SO 4. This stream iscombined with treated sanitary waste and is continuously monitored. This combinedstream is mixed with the uncontaminated cooling water and the effluent for the uraniumsettling ponds and again monitored before being discharged via the ditch into the OhioRiver.

2.5 Administrative Areas

The Administrative Areas include the Administration Building, the Lab and OfficeBuilding, the Shop/Stores/Ofrice Building, and the Power House.

2.6 Calcium Fluoride Ponds

The Calcium Fluoride Ponds include the five ponds, Ponds "A" through "E". Thefacility process uses calcium hydroxide to precipitate fluorides as insoluble calciumfluoride. Precipitated solids are separated in settling basins and are retained onsite.

2-4 Revision 0

Page 14: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

Q

0

0

4)

Cl

Cu

0

4)

Page 15: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

GENERAL FACILITY DESCRIPTION

Figure 2-2 Plan of Honeywell Facility

2-6 Revision 0

2-6 Revision 0

Page 16: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

RADIOLOGICAL CONDITIONS

3.0 RADIOLOGICAL CONDITIONS

The Honeywell Facility in Metropolis, Illinois was visited in February of 2000 to gatherphysical and nuclear data for this site. Facility sketches, building sketches, andradiological data for affected areas were obtained. On site staff members wereinterviewed to determine the radiological history of affected areas and the site ingeneral.

3.1 Radionuclides of Concern

The radionuclides of concern at these sites are naturally occurring and originate fromthe processing of uranium ore concentrates that also contain natural thorium notremoved in the milling process. Natural uranium contains the two principal isotopes U-238 (99.3%) and U-235 (0.7%). Natural uranium also contains minute amounts of U-234. The other radionuclides of concern include Th-230, Th-231, Th-234, Pa-231, Pa-234m, Pa-234, and Ra-226.

3.2 Radiological Criteria for License Termination

The NRC Radiological Criteria for License Termination is given in 10 CFR 20. Inorder to release a site for unrestricted use the two separate and independentrequirements contained in 10 CFR 20.1402 must be met. A 25 mrem per year doselimit and the levels of residual radioactivity must be ALARA. There are at least three(3) methods to demonstrate compliance with the license termination ALARArequirement: 1) the quantitative method in DG-4006 (Demonstrating Compliance withthe Radiological Criteria for License Termination, including the D&D code, August1998), 2) by reference to other appropriate analyses (e.g., the Generic EnvironmentalImpact Statement, NUREG-1496); and 3) qualitative judgements (e.g., good practice,engineering judgement, unreasonable expense). For the purposes of this report it wasassumed that the quantitative method in DG-4006 would be utilized.

The current NRC guidance for acceptable activity levels for specific radionuclides ispresented in Supplemental Information on the Implementation of the Final Rule onRadiological Criteria for License Termination, the Federal Register (63 FR 64132,11/18/98). However the NRC declined to provide specific guidance for alpha emittingradionuclides (U-nat included), but during a two-year interim period the NRC plans tocontinue to develop the approach for alpha emitters. In the meantime the Policy andGuidance Directive FC 83-23 still applies for release of equipment and other materialsduring operations. For license termination during the interim two-year period the NRCencourages the use of site-specific dose assessments based on actual site conditions.The acceptable surface contamination levels used for this estimate are as given in Policyand Guidance Directive FC 83-23 Guidelines for Decontamination of Facilities and

3-1 Revision 0

Page 17: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

RADIOLOGICAL CONDITIONS

Equipment Prior to Release for Unrestricted Use or Termination of Byproduct, Source,or Special Nuclear Materials Licenses. These acceptable levels are presented in Table3-1, which was excerpted from the above referenced document.

The current NRC guidance for acceptable surface soil contamination levels for specificradionuclides is presented in Supplemental Information on the Implementation of theFinal Rule on Radiological Criteria for License Termination, the Federal Register (64FR 68395, 12/7/99). These acceptable levels are presented in Table 3-2, which wasexcerpted from the above referenced document. The surface soil screening value for U-238 with its decay progeny present in equilibrium is 0.5 pCi/g. This is much lower thanpreviously utilized release limits for U-238. The NRC criterion for residual depleteduranium (DU) in soil was 35 pCi/g ("Disposal or Onsite Storage of Thorium orUranium Wastes From Past Operations", 46 FR 52061, October 23, 1981. It isanticipated that applying the a site specific release criteria and the quantitative ALARAmethod in DG-4006 will result in a release criterion in excess of 35pCi/g based onpreviously performed evaluations. For example for the Gore, Oklahoma SequoyahFuels Corporation Decommissioning the site specific DCGL for uranium was calculatedto be 110 pCi/g using the RESRAD code at the 25 mrem per year dose limit. A DG-4006 ALARA evaluation indicated an ALARA action level of 4,780 pCi/g uranium.Therefore the 110 pCi/g DCGL would not have to be reduced further to be ALARA.For the purposes of this report it was assumed that a site-specific release level of35pCi/g could be established.

3-2 Revision 0

Page 18: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

RADIOLOGICAL CONDITIONS

Table 3-1: Acceptable Surface Contamination LevelsNUCLIDESa AVERAGEbef MAXIMUMbdf REMOVABLEbeI

U-nat, U-235, U-238, and associated decay products 5,000 dpm /100 cm 2 15,000 dpm /100 cm 2 1,000 dpm /100 cm 2

Transuranics, Ra-226, Ra-228, Th-230, Th-228, Pa-231, 100 dpm/100 cm 2 300 dpm/100 cm 2 20 dpm/100 cm 2

Ac-227, 1-125, 1-129

Th-nat, Th-232, Sr-90, Ra-223, Ra-224, U-232, 1-126, I- 1,000 dpm/100 cm2 3,000 dpm/100 cm 2 200 dpm/100 cm2

131, 1-133

Beta-gamma emitters (nuclides with decay modes other than 5,000 dpm /100 cm 2 15,000 dpm /100 cm 2 1,000 dpm /100 cm 2

alpha emission or spontaneous fission) except Sr-90 andothers noted above.

'Where surface contamination by both alpha- and beta-gamma emitting nuclides exists, the limits established for alpha- and beta-gamma emitting nuclides should apply independently.hAs used in this table, dpm (disintegrations per minute) means the rate of emissioh by radioactive material as determined by correcting the counts per minute observed by an appropriatedetector for background, efficiency, and geometric factors associated with the instrumentation.

'Measurements of average contaminant should not be averaged over more than I square meter. For objects of less surface area, the average should be derived for each such subject."M'e maximum contamination level applies to an area not more than 100 cm2

.

"The amount of removable radioactive material per 100 cm2 of surface area should be determined by wiping that area with dry filter or soft absorbent paper, applying moderate pressure, andassessing the amount of radioactive material on the wipe with an appropriate instrument of known efficiency. When removable contamination on objects of less surface area is determined,the pertinent levels should be reduced proportionally and the entire surface should be wiped.

-'he average and maximum radiation levels associated with surface contamination resulting from beta-gamma emitters should not exceed 0.2 mrad/hr at I cm and 1.0 mrad/hr at I cm,respectively, measured through not more than 7 milligrams per square centimeter of total absorber.

3-3 Revision 0

Page 19: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

RADIOLOGICAL CONDITIONS

Table 3-2: Interim Screening Values' (pCi/g) of CommonI Contamination Levels

Radionuclides for Soil Surface

Radionuclide Surface soil Radionuclide Surface soilscreening values 2 screening values 2

H-3 1.1 E+02 Ra-226 7.0 E-01C-1 4 1.2 E+01 Ra-226+C ' 6.0 E-01Na-22 4.3 E+00 Ac-227 5.0 E-01S-35 2.7 E+02 Ac-227+C 5.0 E-01CI-36 3.6 E-01 Th-228 4.7 E+00Ca-45 5.7 E+01 Th-228+C 4.7 E+00Sc-46 1.5 E+01 Th-230 1.8 E+00Mn-54 1.5 E+01 Th-230+C 6.0 E-01Fe-55 1.0 E+04 Th-232 1.1 E+00Co-57 1.5 E+02 Th-232+C 1.1 E+00Co-60 3.8 E+00 Pa-231 3.0 E-01Ni-59 5.5 E+03 Pa-231+C 3.0 E-01Ni-63 2.1 E+03 U-234 1.3 E+01Sr-90 1.7 E+00 U-235 8.0 E+00Nb-94 5.8 E+00 U-235+C 2.9 E-01Tc-99 1.9 E+01 U-238 1.4 E+011-129 5.0 E-01 U-238+C 5.0 E-01Cs-1 34 5.7 E+00 Pu-238 2.5 E+00Cs-1 37 1.1 E+01 Pu-239 2.3 E+00Eu-1 52 8.7 E+00 Pu-241 7.2 E+01Eu-1 54 8.0 E+00 Am-241 2.1 E+00lr-192 4.1 E+01 Cm-242 1.6 E+02Pb-210 9.0 E-01 Cm-243 3.2 E+001 These values represent superficial surface soil concentrations of individual radionuclides that would be

deemed in compliance with the 25 mrem/y (0.25 mSv) unrestricted release dose limit in 10 CFR 20.1402.For radionuclides in a mixture, the "sum of fractions" rule applies; see Part 20, Appendix B, Note 4. Referto NRC Draft Guidance DG-4006 for further information on application of the values in this table.2 Screening values (pCi/g) equivalent to 25 mrem/y derived using DandD screening methodology (SNLLetter Report for NRC Project JCN W6227, January 30, 1998). These values were derived based onselection of the 90th Percentile of the output dose distribution for each specific radionuclide (orradionuclide with the specific decay chain). Behavioral parameters are set at the mean of the distributionof the assumed critical group. The Metabolic parameters are set at Standard Man or at the mean of thedistribution for an average man.3 "+C" indicates a value for a radionuclide with its decay progeny present in equilibrium. The values areconcentrations of the parent radionuclide, but account for contributions from the complete chain ofprogeny in equilibrium with the parent radionuclide.

3-4 Revision 0

Page 20: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

RADIOLOGICAL CONDITIONS

3.3 Characterization Data

The characterization data available and experience with similar sites was used todetermine the extent of remediation required during decommissioning. The siteavailable characterization data included removable activity survey data andenvironmental sampling data. The cost for a detailed characterization of the facility isincluded as part of this decommissioning estimate. This characterization would assist indetermining exactly how much remediation would be required in each plant area.

The site removable activity survey data was utilized to help determine which buildingsand indoor areas required rem'ediation. Fixed activity data was not available. The siteremovable activity survey data is shown graphically in Figures 3-1 and 3-2. Theaverage and maximum activity levels measured are shown for each building. The limitfor removable activity for natural uranium is 1,000-dpm/100 cm 2.

The site environmental sample survey data was utilized to help determine whichoutdoor areas required remediation. The site environmental sample data for soil andmud is shown graphically in Figures 3-3 and 3-4. The activity levels measured areshown for each area. For the purposes of this report it was assumed that a site-specificrelease level of 35pCi/g could be established.

3-5 Revision 0

Page 21: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

RADIOLOGICAL CONDITIONS

jAverage M Ma~dmum I7

Lab Library

HP Respirator Fit Area

Capital/CLC Engineers Office

GF2 Office Trailer

Fluorine Plant North C.R.

Fluorine Plant South C.R.

Production Foreman Office

Powrhouse Control Rm

CFx Bldg Control Rm

E.P.F. Control Rm

SF6 Control Rm

FM Bldg Control Rm

NaR U-Rec. Control Rm

KOH Control Rm

Const. Guard Bldg

Sampling Plant Lunch Rm

Laundry

Clock Alley Locker Rms

Maintenance Engineering

Maint. Forman Office

Reliability Office

Inst. Electric Foreman Office

Stores

Purchasing

Lunch Room

Eli

E•

,3A

U _______

53

I].

Iit*.1

500

4

0 100 200

Removable Activity

300 400

(dpm/100 sq. cm.)

Figure 3-1 Honeywell Uncontrolled Area Survey Data

3-6 Revision 0

Page 22: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

RADIOLOGICAL CONDITIONS

m Average m Maxirrum

FMBACn 6hRorI- --

FM Bilding 6th Foor

FMBUldng4th Floor r ---- -

FM Bulding 3r Foor- L J}!FM Idlcng nd lcRot • .. . . . .. •

FM Bulding 1st Florr

FM BuLdcing Basert

Drun Crusher Bidn

!C)Airde Wash BuLding

NAR"U RPc,,ery

Kle Storage

Sa001ing RaN1,50 ,00 2,0 3 3,5

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500Removable Activity (dprn 100 sq. crn.)

Figure 3-2 Honeywell Controlled Area Survey Data

3-7 Revision 0

Page 23: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

RADIOLOGICAL CONDITIONS

NR-7

Northeast of Feed Bldg

East of Feed Bldg

North of Feed Bldg

South of Feed Bldg

West of Feed Bldg

Northeast of Feed Bldg

Maple Grove School

Metropolis Airport

Reiniking Property

Illinois Power Equipment Station

Texaco Station

Brubaker Farm

Lamb Farm

I I

5 10 15 20 25

Uranium Activity (pCi/g)

0

Figure 3-3 Honeywell Environmental Soil Sample Data

3-8 Revision 0

Page 24: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

RADIOLOGI ALRADILOGIAL ONDITIONS

Effluent Dit1400'

Effluent Diti700'

Oak Glenn

ch @

ch @

Lake

I j

I.

Lindsay Lake

Joppa Power Plant

Brookport Dam

Plant Site Outflow

147

10

-I :I

TVA1"

Lamb Farm

0 2 4 6 8

Uranium Activity (pCi/g)

Figure 3-4 Honeywell Environmental Mud Sample Data

3-9 Revision 0

Page 25: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

RADIOLOGICAL CONDITIONS

3.4 Main Production Buildings

The Survey data for the Main Production Buildings (Figure 3-2) indicates that ingeneral these buildings are contaminated and will require remediation. Specifically theFeed Materials Building, the Uranium Recovery Building, the KOH Building and theSampling Plant exceeded the smear activity release levels.

3.5 Miscellaneous Production Buildings

The Survey data for the Miscellaneous Production Buildings (Figures 3-1 and 3-2)indicate that in general these building are not contaminated and will not requireextensive remediation. Based on prior history the Pond Mud's Filter Calciner Buildingis assumed to require remediation.

3.6 Drum Storage Pads & Ponds

Based on history, the Drum Storage Pad,.the KOH Mud's Storage Pad, the WasteStorage Pad, and the Ore Storage Pads 1 through 6 are assumed to require remediation.Settling Ponds #3 and #4 will also require remediation based upon data from ponds #1and #2 that were recently remediated and filled in.

3.7 Outdoor Areas, Drains & Sewers

The Discharge Ditch is contaminated and will require remediation as indicated in Figure3-4. The only other area that has significantly elevated soil activity levels is around theFeed Materials Building as indicated in Figure 3-3. Specific data is not available formost of the other areas and therefore assumptions were made based on productionactivities in the area and plant history. The Employee Parking Lot, the on site pavedroads, the four Railroad spurs, the land between two parallel property exclusion fences,the company owned land outside the fenced property, the UF6 Cylinder Storage Area,the Long Term Cylinder Storage Area, and all other land inside fenced area are assumedto mostly uncontaminated any only a small fraction of these areas will requireremediation due to localized elevated activity. The site drains and sewers are assumedto be moderately contaminated-and they will require some remediation.

3.8 Administrative Areas

The Administration Building, the Lab and Office Building, the Shop/Stores/OfficeBuilding, and the Power House are not contaminated. Radioactive materials have beenused in laboratory area and some remediation in this area will be required.

3-10 Revision 0

Page 26: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

RADIOLOGICAL CONDITIONS

3.9 Calcium Fluoride Ponds

The Calcium Flu 'oride Ponds contain calcium fluoride and some uranium. The pondsediment is a RCRA waste due to pH but there is a license exemption in place thatpermits this material to be disposed of at up to 212 pCi/g of uranium, A remediaitioinplan presented to the EPA includes remove of this material by 2020.

3-11 Revision 0

Page 27: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

ESTIMATION METHODS

4.0 ESTIMATION METHODS

The estimated cost to decommission the licensed areas at the Honeywell Facility is$99,535,489 not including the On-Site Disposal Vaults or waste disposal costs. This section ofthe cost estimate report provides an overview of the considerations and factors that influencedthe decommissioning cost estimate. Table 4-1 provides a summary of the costs associated witheach area of the facility.

Table 4-1: Decommissioning Cost Summary - Honeywell Facility

Equipment, Radwaste Special WasteContracts & Shipping and Shipping & Total*

Operation Man-hours Labor Supplies Disposal Disposal CostMain Production Buildings 199,578 $7,711,307 $1,555,009 $17,734,398 $27,000,714

Miscellaneous Production Buildings 70,325 $2,746,417 $350,638 $1,844,362 $4,941,417

Drum Storage Pads & Ponds 293,089 $11,468,534 $1,344,075 $4,286,506 $17,099,115

Outdoor Areas, Drains & Sewers 5,776 $189,212 $225,429 $5,641,374 $6,056,015

Administrative Areas 535 $20,840 $2,914 $23,929 $47,683

Calcium Fluoride Ponds 38,887 $1,525,252 $562,954 $21,159 $20,000,000 $22,109,366Decommissioning Plan 592 $56,240 $56,240

Characterization Survey 3,142 $166,849 $68,102 $234,951

Final Survey 12,567 $667,397 $272,408 $939,805

Planing Training & Mobilization 1,900 $72,564 $72,564

Honeywell Oversight 8,833 $883,333 $883,333

Regulatory & Licensing 3,311 $15T,187 $157,187

NRC Verification Survey $30,000

TOTALS 638,536[ $25,665,134 $4,381,530[ $29,551,7281 $20,000,0001 $79,628,391

-- 25% Contingency $19,907,098

_ __ $99,535,489

4.1 Cost Modifying Factors

There are modifying factors that significantly affect the overall cost for remediation.One of these factors is an adjustment for productivity related to personnel protectionrequirements and working temperatures. The degree of protection required dependsupon the extent of contamination and specific activities to be performed in a given area.As the level of personnel protection increases, so does the impact on individualproductivity and task duration. Adjustments were made to account for theimplementation of personnel protective measures where applicable. This estimateutilized standardized levels of personnel protection, along with the associated impacts isprovided in Table 4-2. The Productivity Factors related to these levels of personnelprotection are provided in Table 4-3 for Light Work and in Table 4-4 for Heavy Work.

4-1 Revision 0

Page 28: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

ESTIMATION METHODS

Table 4-2 : Personnel Protective Equipment Protection Summary

Level A: The highest available level of respiratory, skin, and eyeprotection

Level B: The highest level of respiratory protection, but less skinprotection than Level A. Level B is the minimum levelrecommended for initial site entries, or for other entryconditions dealing with unknown hazards.

Level C: The same level of skin protection as Level B, but a lowerlevel of respiratory protection.

Level D Modified: Skin protection similar to or the same as Level C, withoutI respiratory protection.

Level D: Standard work uniform suitable for construction work: noI respiratory protection and minimal skin protection.

4-2 Revision 0

Page 29: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

FQTMATInIV X4V YTnnQ

Table 4-3: Hazardous and Toxic Waste Productivity Factors: Light Work

Level A Level B Level C Level D Modified Level DVariables Ulm

T<70 7iT i T>85 T<70 7T i "I>85 T<70 70<T T>85 T<70 16<T ">85 T<70 76<47 T>85A-Standard losses Milt. 160 101 160 140 ::.4.1:40 140 128 12& 128 76 1:76 76 32 32 32

:5 :::i:(""'"""" ..........- ....... ".....

B. Scheduled/heat stress breaks Mill. 60 T0 120 43 i.5 86 35 63 101 30 41 63 30 . 3 44" " ' "" "... .... .... : :,:: ; : ::: :: " " :::: • • ::.. "."......i~C. Dexteritylosses Min. 78 6:::::9:::: 60 74 :69. 64 55 15 44 4 4 3 5 : 5...i.!i ......i :: : : ....:.. .. ..............

..... .... ..... : ::::::::: :::: :::::::: i •i ii~ i:!............::::::..:.:.. :. :'... .. . . ....~i.?[ l? • : : :: : :: : : : : : : : :D. Total time lost per 8-hr. WD Mill. 298 3I 340 257 274 290 218 242: 273 110 =127- 142 67 -70 81

E. Productivity time per 8-hr. WD Milt. 182 1:61:6L 140 223 ::::::::206: 191 262 .23 8: 207 370 S:353ii 338 413 41:.0AlG. 399>:::3:1~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ...ii! .. ........I: : ::.. . , .. .::::::::' I'Z : :: : : :': :

F. Productijitv time on clean site Min. 430 430:::::*3: 430 430 ::::;A430,: 430 430 ::::::430: 430 430 430 430 430 ::-:::430::ý 430

G. HTW Productivity Factor 0.42 i:A0.37. 0.33 10.52 0.48: 0.44 0.61 0.55 0.48 0.86 0.82 0.79 0.96 0.95 0.93No. ...e.... ......

w ............ ............. . ...... ................icotlaf r.alftiffiej o:fik' .. ... 8iýiýýtb -'d ..................... ......... e w ety lytootirt P ibw w9k ................ons. - M t w..................... ................... ......... .................... .... .. ..............dec h ..... . to .. .....I n-ng':-dc-jA-` .. .... . .. ... ..NýItqilig:STOT d I-...................SchcdtdedA- b' iýý6urjt fe

.. .... ... .reaks:ti . ii.ist , - :*%-Io k .... ................... ................. .............. .......... ........... K ... ...... ... .... .. I. I= ........ ...... ........... I ........ I ........ ............ ................. - , .................. ......................... .Dexterity losses are Ws* *&1:6hiiýýjebUý6..bpim*pq'4.'-p*f:ithi ..... = fi..g ........ ... d&xfi:q:ii ctorswsm . , s disco t-iplt ýý'Wcighgp e tý 6ýthk:PPEslmvi oft1w .... .. , , - .... .1 ..... - 14- .... IM& - timinq :b& it& 6f N ' - h .... . ..... ...... .......... .. ............ .... ...... ...............

or.. a PPEJrcstn4cted.liwtWng.an-d t zlmof.minaeýsacftidll- * fted, 1-c6d Ah:-:`-' -nk: 4 ,-.. ..... .... !ca iomýý elnurri y.) r ..t xepreýdnting. ý-Ayerv ýFev t part- W............... .. ...... .00 ý...... ....... .. ......Values fýrw,-.B, andC.Ai,ýji derived'by ed fib . ..... .......spongd or 046h. PPE 16 61, R '*** " - - " " ... t ........ ........ .... ..0- WO! OMISSIMOU...............author's dISCtetiOIL

...................4 ........ -...........Tow pai m e-.- .8,0,nuAute3-,:. ... ...... .......... ........... a:....... .... .. ....... . ....... . ......... -........... ................. :w,-,ifi is Or, br-eiik ' .................................. ........ ......... ................ ....... ....... ........................... .. .. .. .... . ....... ........ ......... .................... - ...... . ............... ........... I ... ........ ... ... .........................

..... .

................

.......

. .....

.............. ....... .. ..... ............ ....... ...................... ........ ... ............. -..... ...... ........... .. ...:7n :7ý ........... 6-480 ........ ......... ...... A` ........................ ...... ......... ........................... ................ .. ........... .............. .............. ........................... ....... .. T . ... .. ... ... ................. ......... .......... ... .......... -.....1 ..... I ...... -... io :: ................ ............................... ............ ....... .. ...-lir.Qteaio n*-i:s::*,iiieid ýbnlý,:: T ... UOINT .16016M Q used.:eme: mergene ... .. . ri... b Le IA." fi*'Wd t4:

4-3 Revision 0

Page 30: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

VQIIIYAX A

Table 4-4: Hazardous and Toxic Waste Productivity Factors: Heavy Work

Level A Level B Level C Level D Modified Level DVariables U/MT<70 10• T>85 T<70 7•<:'iM.. T>85 T<70 T0l: ">85 T<70 I T>5 T<70 T0<.:.. T>85

A- Standard losses Mi. 220 :2210 220 204 -:204:- 204 135 135 135 76 76' 76 28 28 28

B. Scheduled/heat stress breaks Mi. 60 lO. 150 50 75:: 123 64 13£. 178 30 9W 165 30 4: 60...::::......... .......•? ]i: i.. ........... !i•i i i i -... ... .. .. . .......... ....... ... .-~ :: ..i~ .......?:• ii] ::•C. Dexterity losses Min. 80 6 44 32 46 35 44 34 26 28 Q4 18 11 Q: 10

D. Total time lost per 8-hr. WD Mim. 360 37 414 306 [.5.8 362 243 - 339 134 l.0 259 69 83 98

E. ProductiiitytimeperS-hr.WD Miira 120 93i:i::~i.. 66 174 £i)!i!55! 118 237 1•i-i:il01 141 346 2iii~~i90 221 411 397:g~ 382•iliil~36 243~i:i 339i~ 134i ..... .....:#i ~i:ii :i:i::~i•::::~iii~!i

F. Productivity time on clean site Min. 430 430 430 43066 3 4 4 43.07 40 430 430 430 430 .430: 430::: ::: ::::::::::......... ........ ! i •:: :: :: :::::....... ..... ........

G. HTW Productivity Factor 0.28 i0m2 0.15 0.40 ce0.6 0.27 0.55 0.32. 0.33 0.80 0.3 0.51 0.96 :.92 0.89. .t... . ............ ---. . .... .:_ : : I ...............

. . . . .~~~. . . . . . . . ... .- % . - ;:.. . . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . -.. . . . .•" ' " " 'i i • i i ! i ]I : ' : : : : " 1: : : : : : : : : : : :

.................. I : . .. . . ............................ ...........................................

- - ". --' --*,--:.,

peratur -::::ý.... ... .... .... .. ........'6& 6 fb a I .......... .... . IPP -a... ..... ..... ........ ............ ýx" 6 6 ý - h .... I -4s, . do ff ..................Utmej d--atein ........... -PPU g.q,1 0 WinM t ....... ...... .............. tj i* ý:: . ,e Ind &uf ý - - - --P.: ..... gpgagd.1 .nA040j* . ..................... ..................... ....... ... .. .... ...... ...........dccon ind i h" .....................airsupplyý" 11tem .trift ton* -del- ....... .......... .....

.. . .. .. ...... P ...... Y .. .. ........... .................... ..... ........ ........... ... .............$Cit'ýý I' eft mfsixesý:bý'A' ... ............SAUqW :f0 .*1hxU A pen er workd ....... **.-"* ....... **..*..: .................... ...................... ...... ........... ::::p.............. I ....... ........... ........... .......... * ........... ..........Dextditv: 16 §ws de W OP: f th ..... ... th PPEA' 'f alin-- ... .... . 'ghjecti.ve. opinion of, 66t i§:skh:A§-dj..sb epercentage- W ......... P)Mý .... .... . ... ....... ...... .. .....restlicted*.býcathjng and, *conuli4nkýfion:ý: ne tiikiWlý;* ucedýý'yj centag ....... 'ih*' W.-0ý*60ýýr.ed he:per ]eve... ... .... .. .. ........ . ........ ...... .. .. .. ......... ................... O:respý. elfq' * 11) .............. .... - . ........ ....:NI116ý f6r Aý B.:*6hd:C,ý4ý:dýri.ý.ýd;:4ý.::A.V'ýi6gifig. 46 - ý ffifý&KPFE..... ... d :9re"- 00 ................. pq A - 'I"'... ::: Y averageýwere-su J;g: G-ornissionst:............. : ...................... ......

...... .... ... . ....... .. ..............M e , ................................................. ......... .::- ...... : ................... ............. .. ..........T &t 1: 'd ii ............ ..... ... ..a . p a l ........... .. ............... ...... ....... ......... .................... ... ... ..... ........ ......... ............. ...... ...- ........ - ....... :.. ý ........... ........... .............. - ................. .................. ..................507-M iniite:dd aY:on cleiih.site -ý '10 f, 'in ' * -6 d * ' - + A O: -30 .......... .... .... .......... ..... .......... ...... ............. .... .. ........... ........ ýý4ng Instrud idd§ .... : -ftliniitýýd eahiip-+.............. -.................................. ................................ ....... .......... .... ..6 14 :" -...... .......::C I ons:-ý- : ............... ............. - ::::::: ................. ........ ....... ........ ..................... ......ft stft .-ý ..... ... I .:::: . .. .................. ................. .... ... - ..... . W.. ý .. ... :: : : :: ::: w : : ': : : :::::::: :: :::: ::.:::: : - .................. :A 1: d ................................... ..... ................... I ....-9 ...... .* :::............ .... ... .. ..... ..................

........ ......................... ......... ..........................ýI wi ..................................... ....... ................................................... ....... ................... ............ : ............................ .......... i:::: 7: . ........................ ........... ........... fth ... ....... I i t he'y":, a-5 q-re' ........... -I'A fiqVs'ituatlons o fl wmDolad'e"d:::: -,:: .............. ggý... actors.- orL6-e1A-A6ifld be, wi taftow. .......... .......................... . ........................... ........ ............. ............................... ....... ...... ..............

4-4 Revision 0

Page 31: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

ESTIMATION METHODS

4.2 Radwaste Volume Estimates

The volume of radwaste requiring treatment and disposal can be a very significantmodifying factor due to the high cost for radwaste disposal. For the Honeywelldecommissioning, the cost for radwaste processing, shipping, and disposal is anticipatedto be about 73% of the total decommissioning cost. This is a much higher fraction thanis normally seen for radioactive facilities because of the large volume of contaminatedsoil, pond sediments, facilities and equipment. Radwaste volume estimates arediscussed in the following section. Table 4-5 provides an unprocessed waste volumesummary for each area of the Honeywell facility.

Table 4-5: Honeywell Unprocessed Radioactive Waste Summary

Contaminated Contaminated GeneratedWaste Volume Waste Waste

Area Description (ft3) Weight VolumeI (Ib) j (ft3)Main Production 369,170 17,191,090 2,308BuildingsMiscellaneous 37,437 1,510,967 827Production BuildingsDrum Storage Pads & 88,962 7,482,636 3,451PondsOutdoor Areas, Drains 121,496 9,150,490 127& SewersAdministrative Areas 500 50,000 13Calcium Fluoride Ponds 1,351,351 100,000,000 456

TOTALS . 1,968,9161 135,385,183 7,183

4.3 Radwaste Disposal Costs

A significant portion of the overall decommissioning cost is generally attributed to theprocessing or burial of radioactive waste.

For many sites the material to be disposed of is first processed to the maximum extentpossible. This can result in a significant reduction in the final cost for waste disposal.Current GTSD rates were used for these calculations. However there was no benefit toincorporating volume reduction processes. For example the cost to metal melt or

4-5 Revision 0

Page 32: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

ESTIMATION METHODS

decontaminate a contaminated tank was more than the cost to cut up the tank and ship itdirectly to Envirocare of Utah for disposal at a $42.45 per cubic foot disposal rate. Thecosts to transport waste to the Envirocare of Utah disposal site are based on a transportdistance of 1985 miles, at a rate of $1.95 per mile.

4.4 Remediation Methods

The goal in choosing remediation methodologies is to select the minimum cost option toaccomplish a task. There are many factors which need to be considered when selectinga methodology such as contamination levels, degree of penetration of contaminationinto substrate material, equipment cost, support equipment costs, material and chemicalcosts, the generation of secondary waste volumes (waste in addition to the removedcontaminated material), processing rates, labor requirements, and applicability tovarious tasks. Typical decontamination processes are summarized in Table 4-6. Thistable shows the decontamination methodology used, application information, theprocess cost per square foot of area decontaminated, and the amount of secondary wastegenerated. These unit factors are applied to specific areas or equipment requiringremediation to determine the most cost-effective process.

4-6 Revision 0

Page 33: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

ESTIMATION METHODS

Table 4-6: Decontamination Methodology Comparison

Penetration Process Secondarydepth Crew Cost Waste Volume

Methodology Application (in) Size ($/ft2) (f01l1000 ft2)

McDonald U-5 Scabbler Floor concrete 0.25 2.0 $0.691 0

McDonald U-5 Scabbler Floor concrete 0.5 2.0 $ 1.286 0

McDonald 3WCD Scabbler Wall concrete 0.125 2.0 $3.026 0

Blastrac IOD Shot Blaster Floor concrete 0.063 1.1 $0.230 0.26

Blastrac IOD Shot Blaster Floor concrete 0.125 1.1 $0.303 0.26

LTC 10-6OPn Special All surfacesVacuum Blaster 0.031 1.3 $1.070 0.26

LTC 10-60Pn Special All surfaces 0.063 1.3 $1.971 0.26Vacuum Blaster

EDCO CPU-IOC Floor Plane Floor concrete 0.50 2.0 $1.154 0

C02 Blasting All Surfaces 0.00 2.0 $2.356 0.18

Hydrolaser (5-10,000 psi) All Surfaces 0.00 2.0 $0.522 4.54

Hands-On-Decon Non-Porous surfaces 0 1.0 $ 1.441 8.33

4.5 Radwaste Volume Reduction Costs .tp

The volume reduction processes analyzed for use are summarized in Table 4-7. Thistable shows the volume reduction methodology used, application information,transportation charges, the process cost per unit weight or volume, and the total processcost per unit volume. These unit factors are applied to specific items of equipmentrequiring disposal to determine the most cost-effective process. The waste generated atthis facility will include ventilation systems, process equipment, concrete, steel, soil andsecondary waste generated during the decontamination work such as protective clothingand materials used during manual decontamination work.

4-7 Revision 0

Page 34: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

ESTIMATION METHODS

Table 4-7: Volume Reduction Methodology Cost Information

Transport Total VR CostVR Methodology Applicability Container Type ($/Ib)

Super Compaction Dry active waste, 20 B-25 for Envirocare $7.52Ib/ft3

DisposalIncineration DAW B-25 for Envirocare $5.88

Disposal

Metal Melt' Metal Custom $0.84

Metal Decon Metal Custom $0.94

Survey & Release 2 Dry Active Waste 55 Gal Drum $1.53

i. . n, cYcks ft proomwd nater so fthm is no cien wato for disposa].2 Dispose is Imai b-.ud in omt

4.6 Unit Costs

There are a number of.unit factors used to generate this cost estimate. They are listedhere so project costs can be updated when required and the effects of changing unitcosts can be evaluated.

4-8 Revision 0

Page 35: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

ESTIMATION METHODS

Table 4-8: Decommissioning Estimate Selected Unit Cost Factors

Unit Cost Factor Unit Cost Rate Units

Radioactive Waste Disposal at Envirocare of Utah *$42.45 cubic foot

Waste Transportation to Envirocare of Utah $1.95 mile

Transportation Distance to Envirocare of Utah 1,985 miles

B-25 Waste Disposal Container Cost $460.00 each

Management and Supervision $91.59 hour

Engineer $67.16 hour

HP Supervisor $67.16 hour

Laborer Foreman $38.15 hour

Admin Assistant $26.91 hour

Instrument Technician $50.08 hour

HP Technician $44.67 hour

Laborer $25.46 hour

Illinois sales tax 6.25%

Fee 15%

4.7 Final Surveys

Final survey cost estimates are based on the methodology presented in Draft Regulatory GuideDG-4006, Demonstrating Compliance With the Radiological Criteria for License Termination(August 1998) (Ref 6.8). This methodology requires the determination of the number of samplepoints for the various areas being surveyed and the type of survey being performed. The time toperform each of these surveys is determined, and the product of these two items is the labor timeto perform the surveys. Equipment and material cost to perform the surveys is added along withstaff support costs to determine a total cost. The survey requirements are based on NUREG-1575, Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual (MARSSIM) (Ref 6.7). Aspreadsheet was developed which incorporates facility dimensions, labor rates and support costratios to estimate the final survey cost. Facility survey labor estimate is summarized inAppendix A-5 and the open land and miscellaneous area survey labor estimate is summarized inAppendix A-6.

4-9 Revision 0

Page 36: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

DESCRIPTION OF THE DECOMMISSIONING SCENARIO

5.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE DECOMMISSIONING SCENARIO

Decommissioning of the Honeywell Facility requires that residual radioactive materialsbe removed from the site to allow removal of the decommissioned facilities from theirIllinois Radioactive Materials license. For the purposes of this cost estimate, once theHoneywell Facility has been remediated to release limits, no further decontamination ordemolition is required. Upon acceptance of the final radiological survey report andtermination of licenses by the NRC, no restrictions will be imposed upon the site due toits prior use as a radioactive material processing facility. Numerous non-radioactivestructures will remain standing for an undefined period of time. No non-radioactivebuildings or structure will have their structural soundness compromised by thedecommissioning activities.

5.1 Characterization Survey

A characterization survey will be conducted in all areas of the facility that have ahistory of radioactive materials use or storage. The results of the survey will be used todetermine -the extent of remediation required prior to release of these areas forunrestricted use. Characterization surveys are normally performed in such a mannerthat if no contamination is found, the results may be used as, or to augment final surveydata.

5.2 Remediation

Following the removal of all source materials and waste, it is assumed that noremediation will be required in administrative areas. The following is a brief summaryof the anticipated remediation activities, with applicable assumptions and bases, in theremaining areas. The remediation activities are summarized in Table 5-1 below.

5-1 Revision 0

Page 37: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

DESCRIPTION OF THE DECOMMISSIONING SCENARIO

Table 5-1: Planned Remediation Activities

Ara Bidngo rmRemedisition Activities jMain Production Buildings

FM Building All equipment and structure will be removed from the site. Basement 8"concrete walls and 6" concrete floor slab will be removed. Soil 12" deepbelow floor slab will be removed and a 50' wide by 12" deep buffer zoneof soil will be removed from around the building.

KOH Mud's Building, All equipment and structure will be removed from the site. 1/2" ofSodium Removal Building, concrete will be removed from the floor slabs and they will be left inU Recovery Building, & place.Sample Plant BuildingFM Building South Pad All equipment will be removed from the site. 6" concrete floor slabs willEast & FM Building South be removed, 18"x24" footings will be removed, and 2'x3' equipmentPad West footings will be removed. Soil 12" deep below floor slabs will be removed.

Miscellaneous Production BuildingsCalciner Building All equipment and structure will be removed from the site. 1/2" of

_ concrete will be removed from the floor slab and it will be left in place.Ore Storage Bldg., Bed Decontaminate buildings and leave them in place. 1/2" of concrete will beMaterials Filter Fines removed from the floor slabs and they will be left in place.Bldg., Cylinder WashBldg., Hazardous WasteStorage Bldg., & DrumCrusher Bldg.Miscellaneous Waste BM/FF Bldg. LLRW Trash in drums -338 tons, LLRW Trash in B-25

boxes - 227 tons, LLRW Trash in Blue boxes - 27 tons, Waste PadMaterial-1.2 tons, "Scrap Metals Pad - 4,830 tons, New Scrap Metal - 73tons, 16*x16"x&" Metals Pad Cubes - 22 tons, Imhoff Sludge in Crusher

_Building - 73 ton, & Outfall Material in Crusher Building S. I ton.Drum Storage Pads & Ponds

Ore Storage pads 1 through 1/2" of concrete will be removed from the concrete pads and they will be5, Drum Storage Pad, left in place.Waste Storage PadSettling Ponds #3 and #4 Excavate 3' from pond bottoms, backfill ponds with 9' thick clay.

Outdoor Areas, Drains & SewersDrainage Ditch to River Excavate 6'wide by 3' deep by 1.600' long expanse along ditch, backfill

_onds with 5' thick clay fill.Drain & Sewer Pipe Excavate and remove 3'x5'x2000' of drain pipe and 3Yx5'xx000' of sewerpipe, remove 8 manholes/catch basins, and backfill excavations.Drain & Sewer Pipe Excavate and remove 500' of embedded drain and sewer pipe.Site Soil Areas Excavate 2 acres, 12' deep and backfill the excavations with clay.

Administrative Areas Removeand replace roofing material at Laundry Area over a 20'x50' areaCalcium Fluoride Ponds Excavate and remove 50,000 tons of material from the sediment ponds andI ship off site for disposal, backfill ponds with clay fill

5-2 Revision 0

Page 38: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

DESCRIPTION OF THE DECOMMISSIONING SCENARIO

5.2.1 Main Production Buildings

The entire Feed Material Building and structure, the concrete slab, the buildingpads, 12 inches of soil from under the slab, and all of the equipment wasconsidered to be contaminated and would need to be demolished and removedfrom the site for processing or disposal at a licensed radioactive waste disposalfacility.

The Ion Exchange Building, the Sodium Removal Building, the KOH Mud'sBuilding, the Uranium Recovery Building, and the Sample Plant will be treatedin a similar manner. The structures and all of the equipment was considered tobe contaminated and would need to be demolished and removed from the sitefor processing or* disposal at a licensed radioactive waste disposal facility. Thebuilding concrete slabs will be left in place after being decontaminated usingsurface removal methods.

5.2.2 Miscellaneous Production Buildings

The Ore Storage Building, the Bed Material Filter Fines Building, the PondMud's Filter Calciner Building, the Cylinder Wash Building, the Drum CrusherBuilding are considered to be contaminated and will be treated accordingly. ThePond Mud's and Filter Calciner structures, and all of the equipment wasconsidered to be contaminated and would need to be demolished and removedfrom the site for processing or disposal at a licensed radioactive waste disposalfacility. The Ore Storage Building, the Bed Material Filter Fines Building, theCylinder Wash Building, and the Drum Crusher Building will bedecontaminated and left in place. Building concrete slabs will be left in placeafter being decontaminated using surface removal methods.

The GF2 Plant Building, the South GF2 Plant, the SF6/IF5/SbF5 Building, theLiquid Fluorine Facility, the Liquid Nitrogen Facility, and the Calcium FluorideBuilding do not require remediation.

5.2.3 Drum Storage Pads & Ponds

The five (5) Ore Storage Pads, the KOH Muds Storage Pad, and the WasteStorage Pad are considered to be contaminated and will be treated accordingly.The concrete slabs will be will be left in place after being decontaminated usingsurface removal methods.

5-3 Revision 0

Page 39: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

DESCRIPTION OF THE DECOMMISSIONING SCENARIO

The Settling Ponds #3 and #4 are contaminated and will be remediated byremoving the pond sediments, pond liner, and contaminated soil under the pondsfor disposal at a licensed radioactive waste disposal facility.

5.2.4 Outdoor Areas, Drains & Sewers

The Employee Parking Lot, the paved roads on site, the Railroad spurs, the landbetween two parallel property exclusion fences, and the company owned landoutside the fenced property do not require remediation.

The sanitary sewer and site drain system are contaminated and will beremediated by removing the drain pipes and any contaminated soil surroundingthe drains for disposal at a licensed radioactive waste disposal facility.

The Discharge Ditch to River is contaminated and will be remediated byremoving the ditch sediments and surrounding contaminated soil for disposal ata licensed radioactive waste disposal facility.

The UF6 Cylinder Storage Area, the Long Term Cylinder Storage Area areanticipated to be slightly contaminated and some soil removal will be requiredwith the removed soil shipped for disposal at a licensed radioactive wastedisposal facility.

The graveled area to the east of the Hazardous West Storage Building waspreviously used for uranium storage and in anticipated to be contaminated. Thisarea will require that some soil be removed and shipped for disposal at alicensed radioactive waste disposal facility.

There is a small, contaminated soil pile by the employee parking lot. This soilwill be removed and shipped for disposal at a licensed radioactive wastedisposal facility.

The land area to the southeast of the Ore Storage Pads Hazardous West StorageBuilding was previously used for uranium storage and in anticipated to becontaminated. This area will require that some soil be removed and shipped fordisposal at a licensed radioactive waste disposal facility.

5.2.5 Administrative Areas

The Administration Building, the Lab and Office Building, theShop/Stores/Office Building, and the Power House do not require remediationexcept for the roof above the laundry in the Administration Building. The

5-4 Revision 0

Page 40: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

DESCRIPTION OF THE DECOMMISSIONING SCENARIO

roofing material is expected to be contaminated and it will be removed andshipped for disposal at a licensed radioactive waste disposal facility.

5.2.6 Calcium Fluoride Ponds

Calcium Fluoride Ponds "A" through "E" are contaminated with radioactive andhazardous materials and they will be remediated by removing the pondsediments, pond liner, and contaminated soil under the ponds for disposal at alicensed waste disposal facility.

5.3 License Termination Surveys

License termination surveys, or final release surveys, will be performed in all areas ofthe site using the guidance provided in NUREG-1575, Multi-Agency Radiation Surveyand Site Investigation Manual (MARSSIM), (December 1997). The surveys will beperformed in accordance with specifically developed plans and procedures.

5.3.1 Survey Instrumentation

Selection and use of instrumentation will ensure sensitivities are sufficient todetect the identified nuclides at the minimum detection requirements. A list oftypical final survey instrumentation, radiation detected, and calibration sourcesare provided in Table 5-2.

Table 5-2: Typical Final Survey Instrumentation

Ludlum Model 2350/43-68 Gas-flow proportional Alpha or beta "'Tc () Direct measurements(100rcm 2 ) "Th () and smear counting

Ludlum Model 2350/44-2 Nal scintillator Gamma '"Cs Gamma exposure rateLudlum Model 2350/44-40 Shielded GM Beta 9'Tc () Direct measurements

(15.5cm 2)Ludlum Model 2350/43-5 ZnS scintillator Alpha MTh () Direct measurementsTennelec Model LB5100- ZnS scintillator Alpha/Beta 11 () Smear counting2080 __c () _

Gamma Spectroscopy HPGe Gamma Mixed Nuclide identificationSystem Gamma and quantification

5-5 Revision 0

Page 41: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

REFERENCES

6.0 REFERENCES

6-1 NRC Policy and Guidance Directive FC 83-23, Guidelines for Decontamination ofFacilities and Equipment Prior to Release for Unrestricted Use or Termination ofByproduct, Source, or Special Nuclear Material Licenses.

6-2 Code of Federal Regulations, 10 CFR 30, Rules of General Applicability to DomesticLicensing of Byproduct Material

6-3 NRC Regulatory Guide 3.66, Standard Format and Content of Financial AssuranceMechanisms Required for Decommissioning Under 10 CFR Parts 30, 40, 70 and 72.

6-4 Means Building Construction Cost Data, 58th Annual Edition, 2000, R.A. MeansCompany, Inc.

6-5 NUREG/CR-1756, Technology Safety and Costs of Decommissioning Reference NuclearResearch and Test Reactors, March 1982

6-6 NUREG-1575, Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual(MARSSIM), (December 1997)

6-7 NRC Draft Regulatory Guide DG-4006, Demonstrating Compliance with the RadiologicalCriteria for License Termination (including the D&D code), August 1998

6-8 NRC, Final Rule on Radiological Criteria for License Termination, the Federal Register(62 FR 39058)

6-9 NRC, Supplemental Information on the Implementation of the Final Rule on RadiologicalCriteria for License Termination, the Federal Register (63 FR 64132, 11/18/98)

6-10 NRC, Supplemental Information on the Implementation of the Final Rule on RadiologicalCriteria for License Termination, the Federal Register (64 FR 68395, 12/7/99)

6-1 Revision 0

Page 42: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX A- 1 Contaminated Waste Volume Summary

A-1 Revision 0

Page 43: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

Table A-ICONTAMINATED WASTE VOLUME SUMMARYHoneywell Metropolis Facility

Decon" Barnwell Generated* Decon* EnvirocareArea Bamwell Direct Bury Envirocare Envirocare Direct Bury Total

Description Waste Volume Waste Volume Waste Volume Waste Volume Waste Volume Waste Volume(_f_3) (fttA3) (ftA3) (ft 33) (ft3) 3)

1 Main Production Buildings 0 0 2,308 10,860 369.170 3823392 Miscellaneous Production Buildings 0 0 827 1,499 37,437 39,7633 Drum Storage Pads and Ponds 0 0 3,451 0 88,962 92.4134 Outdoor Areas, Drains & Sewers 0 0 127 0 121,496 121,6235 Administrative Areas 0 0 13 3 500 5166 Calcium Fluoride Ponds 0 0 456 0 0 456

0 0 0 0 0 27,682,4470 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0

TOTALS: 0 0 7,183 12,362 617,565 28,319,558

* Notes:I Decon Waste Volume: This is the volume of waste generated directly by a decontamination

process (this Includes such Items blasting grit, treated chemicals, etc.).2 Generated Waste Volume: This is the volume of protective clothing waste generated by all operations on site and

Is a function of labor hours for each activity.

C-AMy ocumennt&W•iedSignaftabke1-.o3- --Paqpe 1--or-4 0WJun:W.- 01:46" PM

Page 44: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX A- 2 Contaminated Waste Disposal Cost

A-2 A-2 Revision 0

Page 45: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

Table A-2CONTAMINATED WASTE DISPOSAL COSTHoneywell Metropolis Facility Named Block

DISP COSTDecon Barnwell Generated Decon Envirocare Total

Area Barnwell Direct Bury Envirocare Envirocare Direct Bury WasteDescription Disposal Disposal Disposal Disposal Disposal Disposal

Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost

1 Main Production Buildings $0 $0 $97,985 $461,026 $15,671,267 $16,230,2782 Miscellaneous Production Buildings $0 $0 $35,115 $63,634 $1,589,185 $1,687,9343 Drum Storage Pads and Ponds $0 $0 $146,500 $0 $3,776,452 $3,922,9524 Outdoor Areas, Drains & Sewers $0 $0 $5,403 $0 $5,157,505 $51629085 Administrative Areas $0 $0 $569 $106 $21,225 $21,9006 Calcium Fluoride Ponds $0 $0 $19,365 $0 $0 $19,365

TOTALS: $0 $0 $304,936 $524,766 $26,215,635 $27,045,337Note: 1. Shading indicates a named field linked to another spreadsheet.

2. Direct burial & generated waste shipped to Envirocare of Utah.

WASTE DISPOSAL PACKAGING & SHIPPING COST Named BlockSHIP COST

Decon Barnwell Generated Decon Envirocare TotalArea Barnwell Direct Bury Envirocare Envirocare Direct Bury Waste

Description Pack & Pack & Pack & Pack & Pack & Pack &Ship Ship Ship Ship Ship ShipCost Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost

1 Main Production Buildings $0 $0 $8,273 $38,924 $1,323,116 $1,370,3132 Miscellaneous Production Buildings $0 $0 $2,965 $5373 $134,174 $142 5113 Drum Storage Pads and Ponds $0 $0 $12,369 $0 $318,844 $331,2124 Outdoor Areas, Drains & Sewers $0 $0, $456 $0 $435,445 $435,9015 Administrative Areas $0 $0 $48 $9 $1,792 $1,8496 Calcium Fluoride Ponds $0 $0 $1,635 $0 $0 $1,635

TOTALS: $0 $0 $25,746 $44,306 $2,213,370 $2,283,421

*Notes:I Shading Indicates a named field linked to another spreadsheet2 These are exclusive use shipments and there is a minimum cost for shipping one

B-25 Box of waste to Barnwell equal to: $1,967

C:\My DocumentsAlliedSignaATable4-1 .wb3 Page 2 of 4 06-Jun-O0, 03:46 PM

Page 46: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX A- 3 Waste Shipping Container Cost

A-3 Revision 0

Page 47: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

Table A-3WASTE SHIPPING CONTAINER COSTHoneywell Metropolis Facility

Total WasteArea Waste Waste* Container

Description Volume Containers Cost(ft-3) (Ea.)

1 Main Production Buildings 382.339 993.1 $524,3502 Miscellaneous Production Buildings 39,763 103.3 $54,5323 Drum Storage Pads and Ponds 92,413 240.0 $126,7384 Outdoor Areas, Drains & Sewers 121.623 315.9 $166,7985 Administrative Areas 516 1.3 $7086 Calcium Fluoride Ponds 456 1.2 $626

TOTALS: 637,110 1,655 $873,840Notes:

I The number of waste containers Is rounded up to next full container.

UNIT DISPOSAL COST FACTORS

Decon waste disposal rate forBarnwell:DAW waste disposal rate for Bamwell :DAW waste disposal rate for Envirocare:Estimated mileage rate to Barnwell :Estimated transport distance to Barnwell:Estimated mileage rate to Envirocare :Estimated transport distance to EnvirocareAverage direct bury waste density:Average generated waste density (Envirocare waste):Truck transport waste weight limit:Truck transport waste volume limit:B625 box Internal volume:20' folloff shipping container internal volumeEstimated cost of used B-25 shipping containers:Estimated cost for 20' rolloff shipping container use:Local Industrial Waste Landfill Shipping & Disposal Rate:Labor rate for shiooina :

$388.12 per cubic foot$388.12 per cubic foot

$42.45 per cubic foot$1.65 per mile1,192 miles$1.95 per mile1,985 miles57.3 lb/cubic foot

25 Ib/cubic foot44,000 pounds

12 B-25 Boxes90 cubic feet

385 cubic feet$460.00 each$528.00 each

$27.30 per cubic yard$44.67 Per hour

|

MWy DocUmflTsiAfiedS~gniaTM6a4-1 W6 l 64 mJn-0 34 k'Pij6'S6f-4- 0- -0 03:46 PM

Page 48: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX A- 4 Waste Disposal Labor Estimate

A-4 Revision 0

Page 49: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

Table A-4WASTE DISPOSAL SUPPORT LABOR ESTIMATEHoneywell Metropolis Facility

Radioactive* WasteArea Waste Waste Shipment

Description Containers Shipments Labor(Ea.) (Ea.) (man-hr)

I Main Production Buildings 993.1 15.0 2995.52 Miscellaneous Production Buildings 103.3 1.6 311.53 Drum Storage Pads and Ponds 240.0 3.6 724.04 Outdoor Areas, Drains & Sewers 315.9 4.8 952.95 Administrative Areas 1.3 0.0 4.06 Calcium Fluoride Ponds 1.2 0.0 3.6

TOTALS: 1,655.0 26.0 4,992.0

Notes:I The number of waste shipments Is rounded up to next full shipment.

Estimated waste loading operator time :Estimated HP Tech time per rad or mixed waste load:Estimated HP shipper time per rad or mixed waste load:Estimated railroad shipment limit:

WASTE DISPOSAL CASK COSTS

Honeywell Metropolis Facility

Liners & Radioactive* Waste*Area Cask Cask Shipment

Description Rental Rental Labor(Ea.) Cost (man-hr)

1 Main Production Buildings 0.0 02 Miscellaneous Production Buildings 0.0 03 Drum Storage Pads and Ponds 0.0 04 Outdoor Areas, Drains & Sewers 0.0 05 Administrative Areas 0.0 06 Calcium Fluoride Ponds 0.0 0

0.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 0

TOTALS: 0.0 $0 0"Notes:

I The number of waste shipments Is rounded up to next full shipment.

88 hr per load88 hr per load16 hr per load66 20' Rolloff

CAWy - , g-n- a fted --a -b I e-4- -. wb 3 Pg fi0 6- .......... -.-Page 4 of 4 . ............ WJ-u-rW, M A ýF46 M

Page 50: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX A- 5 Building Area Survey Cost Estimate

A-5 Revision 0

Page 51: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

UNAFFECTED BUILDING AREA SURVEYHoneYWell MetFo O alS FacIlItyTable A-5

ofro Suwvf Emm mENTE ENTE cmos ENTEsnLow molue ENTER ENTER PACKAGAE AMA AREA AREA _______ PLOORt* U.tLLS" ENTER ROAR. U.WALJ.. SIVBT DRCT

PMII sBw.Dam BOOM AREA M ~ WQTH LENGTH U)GAOT L WALL CER.DAO EAXv. LWALL CIS.W RO TOAL PAO(AM "MRWLOC HAMW MNflwER DEECRFTIOU ? BEOW BELOW BELOW ROM TOTAL S*VEY SURVEY %k@0W" =.VB IUWY LY rM L~RPW IAS~

CODE BELOW BELOW BELOW Avom an ah on I.% .1- COOFT CC"l A..l -.r -OT !!RTPTR A.

TOTALS yl."41 "t 1.025 227 2.02S I? 475

Pý~ I d I P~g. I A AL.ASMc 035 ru-

Page 52: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX A- 6 Outdoor Area Survey Labor Summary

A-6 Revision 0

Page 53: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

AFFECTED BUILDING AREA SURVEYTable A-6 Honeywell Metropolis Faclifty

OERSVEY ENTER ENTER ENTER ENTER ENTERr GAIABELOW ETER ENTER MDETER PACKAGE AREA AREA AREA FLOOR. U. WALL+ fDETER FLOOR. MM WALL SURMVEY wM.Y DRECTOPTN. BULDN ROOM AREA REORD WIDTH LENGTH HEIGHT L WALL. CEILIPG =, L WALL L WAL. CIlUW RI. PA PAGE,*IJMV

LOC NAME ANUMBER DESCRIPTION ? BELOW BELOW BELOW SURVEY SURVEY sWC*W B.5wY W wET W M aY .RWY 2W PRV LAsmCODE BELOW BELOW BELOW (YomE mlfl mI ml CODE CODE 1es5h, BLoCs P ERAm PACTI .- h.- -1 ,,

C A" fE P t O .p- 'o ,

Page 54: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

UNAFFECTED OPEN LAND UNPAVED AREA SURVEYHoneYwell Metropolis FacilityTable A-6

DA1~

OPTIOMdALOC

eforSURFACETYPES

RNsAREA

CESCRFTIMMkElow

SUVE, OFjes ENTERPACKAGE AREA AREAREWO WIDTH LENGTH

? BELOW mo.w MR%%Y f1 ft- E- SW SW. 11" 0E

RandomIehor O..

Su PACA BRL Bowl

TOTALS 1,564 1671 1.7 il7 2.11 Ill 75.6 27- 8 06.

....... .W ' .. fP..... .... ....oý", 03*%"* -**

Page 55: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

UNAFFECTED OPEN LAND PAVED AREA SURVEYS Honavwmfl Mefronolls FacilltyYk3O Aa

!Table A-6 Honevwell Metro olls Facilltv

BELOW ENTRaOPT11ONL MLMFAD

LOC TYPOCODE BELOW

EoNTfAREA

oEsmroBELOW

SURVEYPACKAE

REORD

flyW1

ENTERt ofDTAREA AREAWIDTH LENGTH woe wf10 or woeBELOW BELOW W. bdl. 9,o-

MI MRI ý S-., Sc

ENTER

.f Em-., XX5WyEmRM. RM. Met"

Rd,ý UOWY 10%S-V~ PA•CKA05 SURVEY

S0ý PRE L800(

0 33 4 4

033 4 44

033 4 44

1.0 12 1.TOTALS 9 19 0.3 9 0.1 3

C 'ay 30030301o1011I 0'w a.01S.0.0030.P- I . OcJuO" O3 5,; ý

Page 56: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

AFFECTED UNPAVED OPEN LAND AREA SURVEYTable A-6

Hone ell Metro lis FacilibiENTERBELOW

OPTIONALLOC

CODE

ENTERSURFACE

TYPESBELOW

ENTERAREA

DESCRIPTIONRELOWn

SURVEY ENTER ENTERPACKAGE AREA AREA

REORD WIDTH LENGTH? BELOW BELOW

(Y/N1 (ft) 1111

SUBSURFACEACTIVITY

DEPTHIfti

ENTERRandom

Sketch$Isechl

SRVEY DIRECTS.., ACKAG SUM

er PREP LABOR

TOTALS: a 24 3-979

C~Iy Ooowwofs~obbk OEW Eqg I of I 05 ~Wý, 6. pm

Page 57: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

AFFECTED PAVED OUTDOOR AREA SURVEYHoneYwell Metropolis FacilityTable A-&

BELOW ENTER

LOC TYPES-M -- n

ENTERAREA

DESCRJPTIONsnoQw

SURVEYPACK(AGEREPRO

7EyAE)

ENTER DOERAREA AREAWDTH LENGTHBELOW BELOW LENGTH

ifti Ell) MOCI

B,4bENTER

E*IOS3R ftalWM SUVY DIPOCTc GY.% RATE S&NW5 &S. PAKAM URESUR3JVEY s-.A" X~dM SIN" PRE LABO

'. PON0 -a #-,* 1m - -'AREA SURVEY G110v SCANS SC11

m.) BLOCKS Iý 1F.Mm 107 loll 10, wo

5, 4 0 12 moo

5.291 115 2 110(10 21TOTALS

C 10o Dooa~1W0V, 0~a1OW PO ~ SA,0OSNO•- Jun-O0 03 ?•9 Pk4

Page 58: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

STORM DRAIN & SEWER SURVEYTable A-6 Honeywell Metropolis Facility

CATCH BASIN & CLEAN-OUT SURVEYBASIN SURVEY DURATION (hrs): 4

BAUN SURVEY CREW SM ftow: IENTER ENTER SURVEYBELOW ETu BAS PACKE SURVEY

OPrIONAL AREA DIAMETER REORD PACKAGE SURVEYLOC DESCIPTION .OW ? PR ABOR

Cool BELOW fw Ehrl4 D so 4 5

4_:W1 Cý • -••i0 N 4.04 Gm• rCac 50 N 4.0

4 0- 0 n W0 C..*0 Sý D0 N 404 Dn s Cýi m io" cSOwwl S- N 404 D- 80 , 10Ca•,.. $r r- 50 N 404 • Im Cor* S , 50 N 404 smiwoý l on4L.o =0 N 40

4 S -0*i I4 Lk. 00 N 404 ~lFVS. • Ms0•i's4L N4" .s 50 N 40

S•y Sr•b m 4 Lkw SO N 4.04 0 • o rh•Vs 1 f,4", 5n 0 N 4.0

4 S.miy00 kWmhl #1 on 4"5n0 N 40S4 *ýi S.-m MW o •S•I 4* 1m5 0 N 40

4 5 •4 S- •41. . 4 Lt 50 N 4.0

TOTALS 4 68

C W;~ Do b ý Pg t WO-, 0O0 psi

Page 59: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

DRAIN PIPE SURVEY

PiPE SUJRVEY RATE (lfttv: 40

BoTER DETER E4TER SURVEYOrTIComAL BD"ER PIPE PiPE PACKAGE SURVEY

LOC AREA DLAMETER LB4GTH REORD PACKAGE SURVEYCODEoS DECmPTION BELOW BELOW 7 PREP LABORBELOW BELOW (fr4 tR (I) I. ý)

4 o I0m l,4 V SW'- D-n 02

4 108W Str, 034 :0" S- D- 00• 6

4 V0 SObm-

4 4"C6.6L5..04rI #

4 4' C4d t Drl4 4"Ca• mn Drn l

4 4"C4W0'n (SII#4* CWk6 trim 01

44 C6g =1n DDZ :t

10 300 N

10 3w N

10 300 Y10 RE N

IC RE N

4 300 V

4 3W N

4 sO y3*03w•

225225

4 205

22522 6

4 26S22S225

4 265

22522 5

4.

TOTALS Sc 7A~i6 28C

E 4 OOWNSNNl am Ps 24. P.. .......... .. .

Page 60: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX A- 7 Radioactive Waste Disposal Charge Schedule

A-7 Revision 0

Page 61: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

Appendix A-7RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL CHARGE SCHEDULE

ENVIROCARE OF UTAH RATES

RUBBLE RATE $36.42 per cubic footSoil with less than 10% debris

DEBRIS RATE $42.45 per cubic footDry Active Waste (DAW), less than 10" thick

COMPACTED DEBRIS RATE $76.00 per cubic footOther waste, outsized, etc.

Honeywell Provided Rates for Calcium Fluoride Pond Sediment

Disposal Rate $300.00 per ton

Shipping Rate $100.00 per ton

.... .............. ........ -- .. .07-Jun-00, 08:50 AMC:\My Documents\Notebkl .QPW Page 1 of 1

Page 62: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX A- 8 Instrument Lease Charges

A-8 Revision 0

Page 63: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

T.N. A-$

"8 D16Dldm OuundwbanLe8 htd bWB~y M..D Dsw*mLS ChN.WUNM B3W Mow~w Dw.Gon

COMMERCIAL CLIENT INSTRUMEN-" COSTSI - Mopow F-my

CtAR SLAOMY OW0 P~AL SURVWY 050 ow0 CHR44 uRWY "D0 Pow. ruwYnoTmV Lofi N"o Aom LL ALVERATI b~TU)Tf iNTXwgiNT sameww

ffmW~ cWUlAfAL~ misWuU0gm atrtqwW~ mosTMmmT3 P"OJET MNTTLY LLI LEAE EA

- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s nJ -- ,sn muavv=A~_____ ___________

2- C2 NAM cný vy It45T

I A VSIVIIPC~ Int C- La A - htT YSCM. T...A. fis lif 230__- ft V 01 An.,V~n%3lI~ j dt- ICA II,.T.lMAAn_____ ____

WG V TIUO LpU ~OT A-Sn ____

3ti 54Sn wmmm W.tPV I-D12D 30-MIOL____

*~* S~A~~#.ekmDe - - AkaW6.~. E. LO t

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t MRV A A, AVEAVC - C h 'R.O.0~ O~_____.24...... OACT .A &A"MVT

c- m----

21~~ -mm~ -

*ý w w~f wD DoO~ IV yV 1115".- ~s~.mf~2o35 E SAC ýT4A T ~Ch-) L___ ___

29 *jb wj tVVChIvflEA. socA.44 stal" Ald 2WCCCC ___2__4

....L. l j~m m v 5.wtV yCT somI) TEE-A

35 Lcum h M I Ff AIN AZE h &aTE ft LTPROBE AN CASES tSS

boom~CI I IIE AVVCKLA N LCC242 k 1QE 4ALE2 a HQ4 nt f TEA k! J~A - flE3

47 ow -VC MOMVI EhACCFM NMMR _____ _____ _____lw

51 X RAM1 MO CATV 55ETERMCASE& ACC ATERCIV_____ _____ ___

EM..L. Ij~j LNER kf.~.L DAIT I______ ___n__IM55 6AMM 9WC EL I4.L MAIACEhlSDT _____~ TORI ITT

so W M WC& NW TRATTEABLE WM__ 30__ ______SURCso w ~ CTR .. 461 ... L.~~mf WED...L.......SOURCE'

Do MODEL) 241.3)131___ ____

F7 E11 ES T StE TAVCAT&022153_____ _____ ____ ____QYEN 71 ISOTEW 5 0TT2OVAC CAT 1324T7%0G

j OXlWJG rtAM C.TASTVST

.OSAL NOiV AP

TOTAL HSTUIMLT LEfASE COST[ $1,711-30

CST A T A N.. I Al

Page 64: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX A- 9 Equipment Lease Charges

A-9 Revision 0

Page 65: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

Tabla. -

48 O&D UMorw DunUIon5 PFtAL SURVEY - " Duraion

COMMERCIAL CLIENT EQUIPMENT COSTSHoneywell Metopolls Facility

fiEmARMBER COMMONAIAL ff5406DESCRWTION4

~~NJ. ~ OA AURVW M4 4 00 AL S~*VENUMBER PIAL ALTERNATE IEiWUgN1' NQW.UENITEMS PROJECT mohTMVy LEWS LEA3E

REQUIRED D4JRAIION DURAION COST COST

I l N2 &320

y Y 064 SM

N I 1Z206

1 Y 1162 10

TOA.E UNT 0ESECST $19784 26

1-10, P~q.IS N-1 #, 0U0 Pt.

Page 66: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX A- 10 Demolition Estimate

A-10 Revision 0

Page 67: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

.Appendix A-10, Demolition Estimate

TASK BASED DEMOUTON COSTS42M Hazardous & Tosdc Waste Producttyty Fador Level C. Heavy WoM TO - •5'f

Pewc.l4 Labor Cost 65.00% MATERIAL LABOR EOL6PMENT MATERIAL LABOR EOtAPM6ITLOG m Average Noal Labor Rage UN14SIT UNIT UNIT TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTALCOOE N0. AREA QUANITY UNIT PRCE PRICE PRICE PRICE PRCE PRICE PRICE

I FM BW.bWD-WNI 370,440 CF $.09 $0.10 387.86 $11,200 $106,681t FM rt r F ow Slab 0 6146 3F $324 10.00 $41 479 $7,300 $48,81I FM 6ddin r Co0,lee w•el Dw-O. 301 LF $8174 $1.08 $8r406 $1r136 $7,S4!I Ped l'SoIM o R ewe 191 CY .0 5.75 Z310 o $20; 8,010I FM 94 s9 W BUR V W Ramoed1 868 CY $5.09 $.7 0704 $08976 $16i,9

KOMi De ek O-6awm 608,00 CF $0.01 $0.10 $109804 $14,250 P5.1FM Bkclf Smh PW E.t0r Flow Omb wcheo 3,08 SF $3.31 000m $31,346 S6.64 s.m ,0CFMOWI f Sco,* Pad KE.l 19v4* Coeseal Fo*eo eleon 262 LF 06.70 03.06 93422 S2.316 10730FM S 0 So P4 Pad E &2 EqE . CoeoFt D-en oloe 202 LF $.15 $S.SO $4, $3,300 ISI

I FM 8" 3. Pad EE'.9Sol Rftmel 144 CY $6.01 $6.75 $1.748 $1,71 $7711I FM O Son UL Pad 90.0,S' FIo, Deae 38544 SF _S338 $0.60 $20,733 S10011 s3m21.I FM 60., PaId W0tt Iro24° C..af F OFemeDo0 240 LF ,5.70 $3.46 $3,269 $2,208 06ý4641 FM Bo Ss Pod We9 27.W Eg*P Cweoft Fo=w D.ebe 240 LF $8.16 $6.76 P4666 $3,290 $7 941

, FM So Pod VVW* "16Sol Roow 132 CY $8.01 6.75 1,600 14607 ,3,407I 8.d86. R.eme &W O.,eeeA. 033240 CF $0.01 $0.10 $16.9w $22,200 $39104

1 U Recoylk Owe 114,000 CF $0.0. $0.10 $20,731 $27,143 74741o P4l e& 0-000 71.016 CF $0.00 $0.10 $120914 $16WI0 $200232 Cdo~a baftee 5,00 CF $0.01 $0.10 09.o2 $,307 $.44

-3 SWMPence 6 6 , ,dU m3 d' So0 CT $2M 1.37 Z420 $1031 $4068-3 BaeoSE O Peed A-e .8100 CVw ("IS Y.77 0142 11.08 71J66 1Z30 01600 010987$

4 Et..% 06ID ,Rl IN t600'X 1,067 CY 02.72 $136 94,10 $3,429 $10,3474 ae 00. 86 Ca ( 1,77! CV .77 $1 42 $1.01 48,40 $,624 SI84 $ 8204 E-.*.,WM.edWOe. Pke, 600o0 ' 1,111 C P.04 $1.37 $308 $ý624 0,00134 Remft- Oi4ed 4016P, It1 2;000 IF $3.49 $1.16 $6600 $56624 122334 Ra Wboedded • E" 200 IF 242 $2.6 $02.02 $I 073 p" 9 $,8404 9E-A k 5- E kw - 1 00W"o 064 CY $2.04 $1.37 $2.64 $11912 $,46.4 R. Se S3.- .P 1,000 LF $3.49 $1.18 $,306 $S762 $11 088

-4 Remove k65*044.- ft 200 LF $429 02.68 $72.02 11,073 $29 006- ;I0 9ý494 Re-se es..-el.0 S.A I EA $152.78 $61.00 0Z910 $971 S39914 So PI1 EXc.-w- 1,687 CV $4.77 $1.42 $1.0 $7,960 0;387 $1r767 St2066 CWek Fk-. Pond Seodr R eol 91,011 CY $2.04 $137 $441,734 $207,130 $738,8646 Rotfi Cie Fle, .W. AP e e h Cle y +31 9797.068 CY $4.77 $1.42 $1.06 $468775 $1389,8 $103,720 $709,4584 Ea-ee0,e I• S&..FromP 2 .oo dep 3,227 CY $2.04 $1.37 $106847 110t526 $20,172

-4 bScm Sol E= '.ee 3,227 CT $.77 14A2 11.04 $15,31 $4,682 $3420 $23,393I RA123 6.k d ro 0.0 Wo $462.81 $38 $02s.R-123 R An6 1. ton $452.91 $47 s0 $47

1 Coa,*0,. EWe. 16.4 1- 0370.30 $13,979 so $132079F ed F-4El 10.6 ton 0370.30 $162834 $0 $16,364

1 'A UF4 EI.Wo 16.7 to, $370.30 $14,78 s0 $14,7061 S." Rec iEev 10.1 lon S370.30 $8,977 $8677

Iled Peed F eto 102 6. $37020 $06949 so0 9$894061 Eoved 2.5 t6 $403.61 $29641 10 $S641

EIw 02 o, $462.61 $20 $ $2604 UFA Feed S-,a - W dFI 0.1 6, "462.61 $126 $0 $176

OeeO- SA Feed S.3- - 2,d Floo, 0.1 ko $462.61 $120 s0 $120I &= Sk O , 2rd G- 0.1 Mon $462.61 $120 $0 $11201. 04o.d. ewo . Se 0.2 6. $4021 $171 so $171W IUF4EAo_ 14.0 Me $37030 $12,376 $0 $1 2.37Pmd Feed e. k-W [.,QWp Srew 06 $42.61 $,486 10 s$41

TFo , C--.u- & 54 6.8 $462.61 $8,236 1o0 $6235C- .e "y I C. 649 W. $4S2.01 $8236 107$38

CooF Be- .. .0n $452.-61 $1,010 $0 $1$000IA*Peeeo34S 6. $452-61 5208" so $2 PU

WA" l. B& ro kW H.W 1.7 6n $45241 1,916 0 o1081604 00e.e. 06 A6 $402.01 $S280 $0 $62601 3 SM- Ch*W 6.9 66 $402.61 $8o280 so 10200IT,ýVro Wd.Tak C4WM inT Cel 4.3 t66 $45241 $4r609 10 $4108.e ld ', p 0.3 661 S462.11 $0 so $W3

1 UF)FOb, ShO. C . 94.46 0.2 b6 $462.61 $194 10 $1941 w Cod Tmp 02 66 $462.01 $104 so $194

UVt Hede 0,7 66 $462.61 $753 so $70701 Coobw head l 0.0 ft. $45241 $22 10 S220%, " 0.0 6n $452.61 0S22 s1E0o-ýdee*0 73 66 0452.61 $7,9.4 so $79654

R-134.C C e. 3.1 6 $4052.61 227 10 $32•07I-134 , g. d S o..o toH.0 06 0261 79 $8 $8707Condne. R-123 (Top) 0.6 6 421 $87 10 $870I - Coelao. R-123 &R-134a .124 ) IA ion $402.61 $1,518 so $1510I Coed•e.. 6.134. 0... 3.1 66 $462.61 _20 3200 Stem a 5,w 66 $4524,1 $ 0110i sheC*Id 540 In $42.61 $8280 10so26

1 WO•wpl. 3.8 66 $.402.01 $3805 so $39)S*W 9&90. Fh* 1f. Fe.9 723 ton $402461 $7800 10 $7,100F'l.,. T0.- POalwel(, F-ewW) 0.6 66 $402491 sm9 W0IV( He.". -UpSedee CV. 02 66$402481 0231 $0231

HO0,ae-. Soedeen . 02 1. $45241 $231 1o M32I Coo-b e-- .eeSe¢t¢o Cr. 02 66 $452.61 $221 $221

CeI -LeoeSe¢GoI Cv. 02 66 $45241 $231 so $231Mrt Eb,.,•o 1. V-oo. Pu 0.1 t6 S4521 097 so 107Oodde Vecuum Flaw 1.0 60 $452.61 $1,00 so $1,$I4LIN VV•eFl. 1.0 66 $40241 19 so $,106Ash V-oda Cl... 1.t o6 $452.61 $1 ,P so $01,00UF4N VwoeCla6ee 44.7 1on $37020 038462 $0 030462Aeh V-oeum CS.- 1.0 o6 1$42411 $1iPU 00 $1 P0,44 V-eoae C-,.,. Duw Co , 0.4 66 $45241 $s41 $8 $491

UFN Veoý cl. 0A 6on $45241 IS 0 $48OS , Flea F - 0. -D 4 - 66 $40241 $2;079 $8 $2,0791Hm Bo- fEfQ 14 6o6 $S24I1 $2;000 s0 02000

I H.t amo (W 3.2 wn $45241 0..494 so 13.4D4

c • o*.0,,m•W, 1.obkGw C~dy Oeo..,a,8694o~e661 0988Pag. 1 of90O-e.0.$43P 0&Jn-00, 04:13 Ipt

Page 68: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

.Appendix A-1l, Demolition Estimate

TASK BASED OEMOLUTON COSTSM Hazwrdous A ToXk Waste Prodmlvlvt Faror. Level C. Heaw Worlk 70 UMF

Percent Labor Cos 65.00% MATERIAL LABOR EOU.P6ENT MATERIAL LABOR EOUIPMENTLOC a Avenage Hourly Labor Ride ;, • . •• UNIT WNT UWT TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTALcoaE 110 AREA UAI WET PRICE PRICE PRICE PRICE PRICE PRICE PRICE_

steS..- Ty" M-75 0.7 1t $462.81 S776 SO $77Behe 0*4,.. O-ee Sly UF702 01 on $452.61 $63 so $6B .,.l,.h .~4 064 ANsw $462.81 $62 soS0-1. 2.1 n $42.61 $20 00 $26IOei1 .6.612Sd_2 Ion 037030 $11s06 $0 11i0ULIF C Cnd a 30 n $452,61 $32247 $s 03.24UF4 OD-e 0,...•. 2.1 ton $462.61 $2,260 so $2.26

, A M . 0.1 AN. 6410 13$ 1$- 6 8i11 Nto $462.51 $102391 $0 $10.351 LI.6 .W"d I'. AN $462.61 $1 391 $0 t010'0

I P-non,.l Fs.,, Co, Ow Ab... 03 An $42.41 $291 $0 0201 10C000•6•M.Uemlld. ILnA- 1.0 $462.81 $11103 so $1,10:I 2.0006C -Mo l So.d R6 A.,. 0.2 AN $452.61 $167 $0 $161 4,,000 C.9 -M . "A" S60~ .a. Al- 0.1 An $452.61 "04 $10 ;,

9,60010 MW.4 ed. O.E. D0vot. R.6.6, 03 ANe $462.61 $252 so SU5,5 4so0006Cp. 1Mo11 .-*A'0.S.6A- 0.1 AN. $462.61 $117 so p1

4,0006 Cap -*Mo0r •l.R A.. .V w 02 An $462.61 $244 $0 $24,62 V- Pup 03 An $452`1 $326 $0 $s12

0.0• A $462.61 $31 $0 1Cb Ak III&- -.V,*g 00 Aon $452-61 ;3 so $31I Cl. Pp.a,.. B4- 03 AN $452.01 6212 $0 $31.R- 123 Clea A.i. 0 P-9 0.0 AN $452.61 $30 so S3

11a wa,160,,,,. 02 Aon $402.01 100O0 so SI 000FM BFM EWL Fm 11.0 AN $37030 $9,711 $0 $01711..bVera.,, 0.5 AN $46241 $526 $32

I E*,a 'm-DF...0.W 06 AN $462.61 01,000 $0 0000~STo-. Vea.,, Pup- 2d Fl- 03 AN $452.61 $226 so $325E.4M F .- Soulh Ceram 0CA 1452.61 $1,000 $) $1,000E*..M F. . Wet 02 Aon $462.61 $1000 $0 $1,000E . l4FM - Wet- Are- 0.8 ton $462.61 101000 $0 $1S000B.,..-d E.d F.o- ho.I 0.9 tN $45261 $1000 $0 $1,000&W H&,. k6 Air CE;ý F- 73 AN$462.41 $7660 s0 $7.100Ufn - C-.Ail1 06 AN $452.11 $444 so $044

I*- Fi. -S-P,$. 0.9 AN $402.01 $1,000 $0 $1000Re. Vs 8I 0.6 $452.01 01,000 so $1000vWiw Coal-. 02 AN $45241 $1S so $100I Pota.bel.Akior ond 0.7 A $452.41 $781 o $7601I R6123 5 W 23.5 AN $370.30 $20,762 $0 $20707

R-123 l 11.9 AN $37030 $10,478 so 0101476R-134. LPOk UI. AN $370.30 10,470 $0 $10,476R1e 6 S 0.7 t. $462.61 70$ 0$70R-123 Hig E0f. Pur E Ld 0.2 A $S42.1 $225 s $22W 5 -40,6Awo 3.2 AN $462.61 $53499 $0 $3469

3.2 AN $402`.1 $3,406 NO 3,406O.L *6 32 AN $452.61 $53498 $0 3,46

I C "'**. 52 A $462.61 t.6246$ $5406317 Pb. T- R.at 0A $462-61 $438 so $432O"t 04 $452.61 $469 so $4601 . 0.4 A $4C211 $40 $0 $409O-M 0A tAN $452.61 $469 so $406O -d. - Id IA AN $402.61 $1s000 $0 $100S46h Board. NE 0.7 AN $452.00 $760 $0 $7.0swhBoad. E - Ca 0.7 AN $452.61 $760 $0 $7.0&MBo rd d. E - S 0.6 An $452.61 $653 so 650

6g B.o 82 AN $462.61 $8,060 so $S6e4Low s• . i.9 .oN $402.61 $7,416 $0 $7,41SO 2 Swrp" Vc.. Puny Ak.mi,. Too. 0.6 AN $462.01 $"61 so $051#1 1 V.. lPw Ah. To- 01 AN $462.,61 61 $0 $6010 2 P--" Fod N w 19.2 AN $370-30 $160g35 $0 $16092I t1 Pvd F.d H6pp.2 $270t30 0062$1 8 $0 $086902TeO y WTd 5W.6 AN $462.01 ,52 0 $3,63293 -- ,. Feed H,",2 AN $37030 $1659n $0 000039

T6. 1, Ch. Addft" PW 0.0 AN2 $4021 $49 $0 $40Kok Q Put 03 AN $46•211 $261 0 210R-134Aa. euw, 1.6 AN $452.61 $10572 $0 $1.672R-1.4.1 o 0.0 AN $452.61 01,079 so $100790 0h Cy.w. Sp:de 0.0 N 4.0i $0 so $00O UFO SS .•5.0 AoN $4620,31 so $0.301

P'loP- T-. R..oot, 0.1 An $4S2.61 $103 $1026RQ V6- D-s Col. 0.0 AN $46211 031 so $31R0 6 Vad.e-DoOlOfL ,.6B.mL• 0.0 AN $452A1$ $34 $0 $3RO6 Va"W *A* 8W Wt. D0.0 AN $4162.0 $291 so $2

,.Vds .. M-410 0r6 AN0 $462.01 $21 $0 $021 6 y V.1- Bd F-s M Do.- v. 0.0 AN S45261 $31 $0 $31Rat V&8% " Bo6 d F DOis 0.0 ton $452.01 620 to $31DI, D06h. WI N .44 OF-4S. 0.0 AN $W42.61 $611 so $516CMW.A, EB.. 0i.. So-w 02 AN S4628 1 $219 so 020

I Pr* Fed Hopper Fod. S-,ey 0.7 AN $462SI $711 so $710I Ur.ndF F-d 4MStera 1S ANA $45201 $1.474 so 01.47

C~l$ O.o.oo..b14d.661 O~

Poe. 2.40

00..0,..00. 04:03 P04

P.O. 2 o( 9 0`6 ,A-01), 04:13 PM4

Page 69: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

.Ap.pendix A-10, Demolition Estimate*4 Q rP•ii::i•~ ~~i;!!i!i:•iii••iii!!iii:i•i~~ii•~• !:i!•~iiiiiiJii

TASK BASED DEMOUITON COSTSIM haazrdwi A To&t Waste Prochfitivty F~

Pertet Labor Cosl 95.00% MAYERIAvera~e Hourl Labo Rate wET

acto2r LeVol C MeaG WNW L" To. -

LSC 10MCOCE Ue.

IAL LABOR EOhPMENT MATERIAL LABOR EOUNPMETNr WET WT TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL

PU¢ P PRICE PRICE PRICE paEE

$

'A' Red

C~~c~& t a P.g. 3.19

OO-Ja,.0O. 04 I) PMPw.o z3 o9 06-J-00. 04:13 PM

Page 70: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

Appendix A-10, Demolition Estimate

TASK BASED DEMOLITON COSTS42 Hazrdous & Toxd¢ Waste Producthlv Factcr LevW C. Heavy Work 7TO • 8SF

Pacrtl Labor C"ol 65.00% MATERIAL LABOR EQUPMENT MATERLAL LABOR EQOUPMENT.OC ma Avwage Houotr Labor Raoe L WET UIT WNET TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL

Coca No. AREA QUANTITY UWT PACE PRC Price PRIM Price PRICE PRICEI 40000 INw 0.1 to 4S211 $85 s$ o1

2000" Cap Hod 0.1 $ 1452.11 $61 W0lOO0 c.Ho50 (1w 00, 52.1 $40 so100I C Hodo 0.1 5 5211 126 10 $12

70I IOOWC.p.H W.Eodk 0.0 I 452.61 37 00 $37I On.,-V , D- ,.,g., 22 Son $462.61 $2,344 $002

I v..o - Oe 1.0 tM $452.61 $1,125 s0 p1AlI OC00 Cp.Moo..ol 0.3 5$4562.81 -$201 so $291I 000 cp.oo 0.1 60 $452.61 5117 s0 $III1 45001 M Cep. 0.1 b0, $462.61 $117 s0 Oii11 4,000 oC*pr. 0.3 5, $2.61 $u 1 $0 u I

M 0.3 lo. 452.11 $376 SO $37f4.000 C io. 0.1 lo, ;452.61 $94 $0 $94

ý =k Co, AakA 0.0 Ion 152.61 I$0 1A" P• 2 1~i, 02 ton $462.1 $260 $S $26"

E*owd F.- -So*o. Row,, 0j ton 1452.61 $44 so $44I E,oo Fan b,0e-- 0.1 50. $162.61 $115 110

I WdONE.W F. -.Soh OA 6e W42.15 $1000 $0 0100L Wid E4Aoo Fare * V. 0.9 5, $452.61 $1 $0 $1000

11317-1 .ýI LVt 0. i5n $462.11 0 $6001E~w F50 00 4 362.41 $1,000 so $1, 0.

EI..slM Fm* 0.6 on 1.402.61 $I,0 $0 $1 ,000I Oo B, Sd . 218 5, 1.462.01 $3,000 000 0,

1 EAJMd Fan 0i ton 0462A1 $1,000 so $1n000I 1V Top MAW C-64 A•11o ot 0. $.46281l So"4 s0I Wdl E*ond F.- -.S*W- 01 504 52.1 1,0 0 010o0I1 C•ow 02 50 1$462.1 1 186

A TM HS.ew 3. 50, $452.61 $4061 so $4,09144 DiE. F..dd ACI-MA. 0.e In 1$42.61 S10 s1 oI LE O Food A," CbJA. 1.6 10. 1462-61 $1,734 00 $1734-1,tbohrd E N.Wod- 3.0 t1n $452.61 03,750 00 $3,760

E.*l*I"-. E.0 62 eo. 1462.1 $6020 00 00,626I ;..o,40 Tl.. - D.6. 1oI 50, 0462.1 SI 000 06 -1 000V

I D F.d H 2.8 ton S04211 $2.000 ,000I l SOi Feed T.,A 4.3 2n $455281 $4,683 $60 $41103

1 2 8SW Fed Tw* 4.3 5 $452161 $4.603 so0 $4603S w F;- opp, 9,1 ton 1462.01 09.769 to$9769

I Spr ! Hygw 3,S ton 345241 23,750 ,0 $3,7503 SO F.ed Tark 4.3 1- 1452.61 $40M 00$4 •0r3

1 q Food HM- V1b . W6.d 0.0 ton $452.61 $7 00 07I A" R-•.o S, Oodt V66rw 0.0 ton $45211 $7 57

I -ro Do py fwNub VbOlo 0.0 Ion 0462.61 17 0

C.Wy DoewnentsIF 1, 1 1 1 I.OPW CW5 Doeoeuoa~eloOAI OPWp"?o 400 00Jo,00

92 06.--01), 04:13 PM

Page 71: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

Appendix A-1O, Demolition Estimate

TASK. WEDC DEMOUUIN COT. MmiW • EU . •

IO =a!"

PaeLabor COSt 65.00% • ATERLAIL LABOR EOqJPMET MATERIAL LABOR EQOIUIPMENTAverg Hwul Labor Rate i$; ii>* UIT UNIT UNIT TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL

AREA QMThT UNIT PRCE PRCE Pece PRCE Me,,eTOTAL

I

$4

1

$1

II

6W W- *ow,4k tkl, ~ Pao. S.( 9 C~p o~,.UW~~&1 W~ Pg. sf9OR..,O00 04:13 PIN

Page 72: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

Appendix A-10, Demolition Estimate

TASK BASED DEMOLITON COSTS4n% Hazardous & Toxic Waste Producflvky Fador, Level C. Hearv Work. 70-85

Pmwcas Labor Cos 65.00% MATERIAL LABOR EOUIPUG4T MATERLAL LABOR EOUPMENT':Average Howrl Labor Rate g :: T WNT UIT TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTALCO AREA QUANTITY WAIT P FUCB PACE PRCE PR=C Pri PRIC

Ch4" Te 24 16e $462.61 $2,64 $0 $2,64dt Ak,' A 2A4 4 $462A S25,$44 $0 S2,6t 94 N.L WFer 0J4 Io, $452.61 $031 $0I SO Tw OEFf 04 W. $462.61 $831 $8311 60 Top W Few 0,0 U4 $452.61 $t $0so

0 1 68 &.0e W4 Few, 0J 1 $452.61 $831 so $6311 Wddw..d.: 0.2 14 $452.01 $209 $0 5201 Weld.e. Ide 0.2 b6 $4S241 $200 $011 HIA@ -. ColTr E-444-tASe. 140 14 $462-41 $106c to $10011 H.o,-.. -C Tv E-413-2A S-. 1.0 t1o $452.66 $11059 so $1,061tHot • -Cold Trp 64t1-tA T.. 1.0 14 f/2.611• 1,060 ¢ $1 061I 6t 0. I 1.0 ft. $462.41 $1060 $0 $1,008

1 640 8-- CodM Yn - E-412.2A Tel 1.0 In 452.61 $106S $s $106I HM Se. Co Trip - E-447-.1 0Sa. 1 A 5462. 11.06 1$06$ 1I Ha•w l CoCld Trp E-446-26 S0 . 140 W4 $452A1 $1t060 so $1,066I H O•-a. Cold Try- E-472-1 T,6 1.0 1- $462.41 $1,060 so $1,06I H1 6- . Cad Tray • E-473-20 T.t 1A W. $462.61 $1,069 $0 $1.06

H Her B 1.0 Io S462.81 $1.060 so $10'I H.1 Bw - Co Trp - E-41 1.0 ton $452.61 $1 06 $0 $1,06it H610.,ColdTray602 1.0 14. S2A1 $1060$ $16061I MW - Co..Cld Tn - E-403 1.0 6, $462.81 $1,060 so $1r066I PabbleHaol..6MhIAE.L 0.0 ton $462.01 $1M $8 $60

40000 -. Ho• 4 & •6 1* FR* 0.6 tn $462.61 $81 $8 W81I 200DO- HO OeA Roduda 00 t., %46241 $42 so $42

I HM al.6 O,.0 AA & AS Wl F01 0.1 t4 $452.61 Sal so S6140000 ohi & TI" O- 93 W2 ft 0.1 14 $462.61 $79 so $7010000. HoW. ROWyVa. Shwaga 0,0.4 14 $462.61 $40 $0 $481 1000 .CaPb. HOW 0.0 1n $462.61 US $8 $461006 cap- . Hw 0.0 ton 1452.6$ $46 $ $460 200000 M.,.O - 0 Cold T 20 Tot 04 ,n $452.61 $1005 $8 $10 O

20,0009 M0on0W * Os Cold Trp 18 0.0 b, $462.61 $,006 $8 $1,006200,0000 Ma•,oCaId YTn 2 Sea. & IA T1L. 140 14- $42.06 $f,670 $ $1,670

I 20,0000 M-.- Ovn COd Trap 2A & 1B Sec. 1.6 4 $452.61 $$1,670 so $106701 20,00 Moo-C*d Trap MA S & 2A Tw. 1.6 W4 $452.61 $1,679 so $106761 I 11.a000 .al. -Over W . OW A4 0& t14 $452.61 $300 $200

S70000 M1 *x - Oo WH FR-•84LA 02 ton $452.01 $266 so $2661 6,00006M-o.,od - 0- W Ffto, 02 14, $452.01 $222 so $222

1,0000 o0- W A OiAS 0.1 14 $452461 $139 $0 $1i9

1,000I O ol-*OA'G.A- 0.1 ton $452.61 $132 $ $MeI MO-4 1 Mal. -0-I C-4 19) Me Fed E.ý, 0.2 b.n $452.61 $160 so $1I61 600-4201 r00O M-.0- RO V.. 9,Ares 0.1 t14 $4S2.61 $03 so $931 V m Pa$ 0.1 ton $452.01 $72 $0 $72$ 1 " Re,,clo Co.6 Ak ow 0.2 1$ W2.61 0$76 $0 76$ Pke.,Co0.2 t4$ $4524U 1 $375 $8 $3751 Ea.ad Fan - 3o.,h Med. W A- 0. t1o $4.62.61 $tI000 so $ 000$i E4, d F,,,V.9W WV.1 - , W A ton S45241 64,02$00$ 1,060ot $ E Fan 14 W. 1462.61 . $ 000 $8 $2000I ., .1 Fen 0.6 b14 $462.61 $31 so 631

IF W JW l * o. b.l. - West 0.1 Ion $452.61 $04 so $941 -W W S- .y Jet Scrnba. EW 0.1 w, 1452.61 $94 $8 $94$ *F Reducawo Air Ck Fe, Fh. W4 $452.61 $0160 $810I Ed-at Fam 0.0 bon $42.61 $1 000 $8 $ $60I Was. Coa., 0,0 tn $45211 $45 so $45I 6-402 A R•t•"W * Swfic. Cobt. 0.3 ton $45241 $80.47 $8 $80,47I R400W "Akda. 0.3 14 $452.61 $09047 $0 $0.947

RoS- R.I.. s- 0.1 14, $452A1 W-4 $8 $84I E*6.64 0.dad Ca. 5;2 (F41$) 0.1 14 6452481 Sa1 so Sol

I F.0 Fan .624) 0.A I4n $452.61 $84 $8 $041 Ea.. Fan 039 -0.1 14 $452.61 $84 $4 $84S E.,- Fan (P-) 0.1 . $46241 $84 $ 0O41 3,616 0I Me 10.2 14, $452.61 $10,038 $8 $1 0091 6Ao Cwanm COr M 42 n 646S2.61 S4.500 so $4,000I In Co p.per(-) 1.4 e.. 1452A41 $10lo so $1 04I *AW R.dot Fe F- Ho - 0.1 i4 $452.61 $103 so $102t U2Caex. *2C- So (E- a Cn. 1.9 t4n $452.61 S1,969 $8 $51.

I 1E FtA 8,,l Tat 0.6 6M $462.01 $817 to $897I L 7. & 6"Tark 5.1 14, $462.61 $85622 $ $0,722S -1 r Rod1 kMet Fl-eps 0,3 ton $452.6$ 0221 $" $331

t 23 Com. H -P . Weal I A ton $465241 $10, so $,091 Vlblo. . 9 W. Od6 Da'at Co.. Hl . (E) 0.0 t1n $452.61 $7 $0 $7I ' .1 a 1 W.1 O6,4dd. Dod Cxl Hp f 00 t14 $452.91 $7 so $7

.2 ~2 0 6.0 D0 , Coo. Hop. Cx u 0.0 b $452.01 $7 0$7-2 VOW O.. 4. C.I. aIa.M 0.. 0 ton $452461 $7 $H

Il~b 604 FltawA *1F4 Dihd.ILb. 0.0 t. 14524$ $7 so I7I Vbta- W Fib,"A. fF.4071 TO LW. 0.0 4, $452.61 $7 $0 $7

VbI -W. FIewA3 C-41$ O. d, 1.8n. 0.0 1, $452.61 $7 $s $7t V tw rW Flaw *Ar (F-443) DOich Lne 0.0 t1 $452.01 $7 so $7I Vb. "UM P,. D.0C4l -(F42M Hw. 0.0 t. $452.41 $7 $8 $7I S0rWA- A2 PA. FP1,, FIta (F-432 0.0 t. $45261 $7 so $7

l -Al Pri, FFb, Pt*. -433) 0.0 ton $452.01 $7 $0 $7$1kw - B2 Pn PeoFew (F..4001 00 6 $452.61 $7 $ $7

1 Vb,. -AI Pft-•.P$ • DU.h -40) &0 t4 1452.61 t7 $8) $71 l.O.-- H DRur .U- 0$0 $452.61 $7 $8 $7

Vb. A PWe•n Dd HM D-.•Ut.) 00 1o, $462461 $7 $8 $71 Vb', - WARd•o. Feeder 0.0 t. $452.61 $7 so $7

W1x VbwUP0~OP~.Dd".l -41$ 00 W. $452.61 $7 $8 $71 Vibola A R.&a14,FO Peap 040 W. $462.01 $7 $0$7

$ Vbrd. - -BI W Fla (F-600) Dub., in. 0.0 t. $45261 $7 so 07

I 504.60, - S 0 Fi [4 ih 0.. ad04 14.$52.01 $7 $ 7-Sb, , W - FReFeed Hpp, 0.0 ., $45201 57 $0 $71 VA * -W Rd. F -d. (R -W0)0 ton $452 61 $7 $0 $7.1 V . 0 *.A P- FPw 61 s4 0.0 t . $45261 $7 $8 $7I "b cr Fnew Pte Fw sh.l 0.0 ion $4S211 07 so $7

cW..V D--f, tWc*.W.OPW 06-Ju-00. 04:1 3 PM

Page 73: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

Appendix A-IO, Demolition Estimate::•:ii••#;i::•:i:i~i!i:P::!iiiii•i••iJ:ciiii•ii~iiii!ifriiJii•:•~~ii3

TASK WAED DEMOLgTO COSTSin HAazudOUS A Toxk Wagte Productvity Factor Layll C. Heavy WOIL' 7U . S5*F

Pwtut Labor Cost 66.00% IATERLAL LABOR EOUIPMET MAXTERIAJ. LABOR EQUIPMENTAverag Hourly Labor Rate uw UNIT tUPT TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL

ARM QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE PRICE P15CE PRICE BELOC 14 TOTAL

I

I

....... ... o ~ I. k .P .~g -- ....... IM J.O

........... . Pug. 7 o( g OW-,00,O 04:13 IPM

Page 74: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

Appendix A-1 0, Demolition Estimate.. P•.. ....

TASK BASED DEMOUTON COSTSi hazowftu & Toxic Wast. Pmducllvt factor Level C. Heavy Work, 70 - 85?F

Port,,ALbOr Cost 0&.00% IMTERLAL LABOR EoL0PU6NT MATERIAL LASOR EOLUIMPI40TLOC vM AvwnV. Hourly Labor Rat. u we UWu 66T TOTAL TOTAL TOTALcowC up AREA QUANTITY UWT PRICE PM=E POCE PUCE PIUC PUCE

I H-AB Fft.~ 0.0 0. 0462.01 $42 toI WW dM& A21 HF .. 0.0 6.n $462.91 $42 $0I HW-I.W R.&xW9JU.. 0.0 lo. 5462.61 $42 soI Md- A2 I'M& SU FUooFilm 0.0 Ion $42.01 P42 $0

-1 od 1BU Flogon Fiber& AdHF F 010 0. 34S2.81 042 $01 WM -Ash Dud Ca. 0.004 $452.61 $42 so

1.04. - Al & B2 BU &£B2 P.,b. , PU... 0.0 S4 462.91 042 $0I.Pd Al& B2 BU & 92 ft-F%6onFf., 0.0 0.$402.61 w4 soM04.1-V Rod. PA.. Fan.. 0.0 04$462.81 042 toHood. C* fti Pd,ý. I'Me. 0.0 $4 452.61 042 soNo04-"C'FWSlU.~ 0.0 0n452.61 042 $0

1 30000 Morwel 0.1 04. $452.8 $122 so1 20000 Mw"~i -*C' Fbt Pvi FE....- 0.3 Ion $452.01 $352 $0

20000 Mono.I.CF5no. SýFft. 0.3 04, $402.1 $201 $060000 W-o.61-Al LB2 SU &02 FA FkMoFL 0.2 $4 462.61 0261 so40DONMoo#d- 81 BU Fkb6o,& ASHF FU. 02 ton $452.01 $208 so30000 Mono-&AI IIJ0 FII &4 B2 BU1 Po.. 02 ton $402.61 0247 so

1 40000Monoa A2 FA& A2 SLI F1oom FL 0.2 04. S462.61 &107 I

TOTALPUCE

SI

$1

$0 s&S71

tl

S2.9

$41

040$40

$3,1

$26

$7SI

$5.

$6x'$7-11

$7:1$;

5$4

5500 ?57$&Soo0 557S

.. .. .. .... .. ........ -- -CýWy Do-wftW*"l.OPW Palge $ of C~y oo.,.onole*OI 8W ~o. .1006-J-0.0. 04.13 PU

Page 75: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

Appendix A-10, Demolition Estimate

TASK BASED DEMOLUTON COSTSUS Ha•ardouw & Toxic Waste Procductlvtv Factor. Level C. Heavy Wodt 10 85EY

PW'Cli Labor Cost $5.00% MATERIAL LABOR EQUIPMENT MATERIAL LABOR EOUIPMENTLOC Averagel Hourly Labor Rd* i UNIT UeT NRT TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL

CODE Ms AREA QUAHNTTY UNI6T PCe PRCE PR=C PRCE PRUCE PICE PR=E4 Caftm*wd ODbit . Swoo 8 P.t RaloaM Tldr I j ton 5452.61 $100q7 s0 516172 BMOFF bdd.a LLRW Tr-e I, d- 337.5 A $452.61 to..,707 so0 363.7073 Md.W CW W e-WPId 1.2 10N $412.61 W. 126 $0 $1,2932 BMiFF b LLRW Trsh I W-2S B•o 227,3 tn 5462.61 s244 060 $0 5244 110

-2 668FF bkd&re LLRW T.rh 51.8. Bf.B s 27.3 AN $o2.61 $29,3403 S-p MAW on Mo6 Ped 46430A An $370230 54.256,W2 $0 $4,260,6623 N.w. Sa Meon M. PId 7"2.9 AN $452.61 $78614 $0 17066413 1"r r6 r -oh. dq, p.j - M kee Pad 21.6 An S462.S1 $23.277 $0 $23.2772 koAN sawa. 1. Rtw &o 73.2 AN 4S2.61 $7.,924 50 $79,262 oadl W a 1., C..t• &,"v 5.1 A2.61 $554 so $5,45

R-R A..(Ro O- Ly 1,000 SF 51.16 $2,726 $0 2,2726

5507,195.8 $8,855,711.1 6462.2238.7 S10,025,546s

C% tDaoe646..1OWPg. 1

8J,.0 41

Pe,9 9 of 0&Jn-00. 04A 3 PM

Page 76: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX A- 11 Volume Reduction Costs

A-1If Revision 0

Page 77: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

WEIP ATIONAL VOLUME MUCTlOH C )ST AMALY4== , ____ - -tpg

WP(IT #~J UAPS/ ffiT 0V2M -ý ^ PROCEI~RIEDWAMAM DIIPOIN.AP. VA METHODOLOGY ARA ITM ITE _____________CONTAINCOO Cd NO. VOLUME SL^v-Vm~ T ~SOl""A - m W WCCOSD OR ENwTY WEIGHT DISO&AL COSFT COTT Pwoucr voLubm WEIGHT COST

p^;] -b 3 t~o.) .So. IIIL. FACO F X f .JbL L

I I 0

CCST sAoUPS

AP. VA WrloOOLOGV AMA IS. mom well COPPTAM. -L Amy~ WU *COOS SQ. VOL OSUTY WIRQHT D ASOL COST COST 7 Omm SHV CS

M AO WA

o FA 0

NOE V04

0-•J O..t -

a.~.a. et

alk.•Q •bO ID •f•

Page 78: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX A- 12 Decontamination Costs

A-12 Revision 0

Page 79: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

T5*6* A-1lDECO14TAMINAT'1OI c¢0

C9C -WACO9 fRMVA.• COST Ytf WITH BARIA- - - - -

- - -m~trmwr INU INPUT INPUT INPU INPU IMU ,r Av -PfDMCG €o? LIu6-I LOC vm CONT. CONTAM. SURF;M COST BARNWELL DECTAPP 6-T6<CD0OY AREA ITEM CODE No. &*FACE MATERIAL TOTAL R1EOVAL WASTE CONA. COtAk mo w COST 6 RELEASE10TCODE

GRAfIK voie ro ~~PO~0 6. CMO RA1E FILRIALCODE __ AREA T)*CK VOLUME. DENS" VO.U6 WET SHP & SURY COST COST TOTAL (m) SvIS &

I I f 6000

D500D I*PCrCARE-A SUIACIF EWVALCOBT IIAyI8•I2YENVIROCAR9WWPI )IAL

APT IP IU Now INPUT IUT IUT w ITCOTPUA-40AET LOC V.6S Co0000. C!r AM, -IMt0C.R11W A LCO SRPCE COST E20PCE •C7CODE ITEM CODE No. SURFACE MATERIAL TOTAL. REMOVAL WASTE CONTA4M CONTM. BURSAL P OCE00 RELEAS GRAND RATE 0U6I.LAREA TWICK VOLE OM D VO0mIw W Sw & Ooio cosy COST COST TOTAL CW• 504P a.

4." S 0500 6*7 2105 11174 sS611 2 12334 126 0424566 60500 67 312 6.3S$.g25 66.654 ITS S 626 1252' E)OC'IOCOsoot ,I.6r" **o•4r *.om 0 2 06.40 I 0500 667. *6377 144.72 r1.64 S166.3 07303 16.20 1424"b. m• $! M24 2.5s I'm $13,341 1 •2i25 EDCO C I 'lJ-60C00O 1 0 bocR.. Cra65.0661m6uo 2 S.423 6 00364 16324 .13 5 .21423 CO C;PO-J.0C06066Pim.¶,2 6 4 o •x*w n 06666 2 750. I 0500 667 46 673 14 1*,6 16,0 6 30 1424123 EDSO CIO 100 Roo• o546 1,2 60~t A4o6&soI floor 1 2.314 0.50 667 6456 3.65$ . 64 II4 1271 6624 6.00 •1 42423 000J.OO0P06 .. 6 D-006no'1,66 c-6 &" q. 2 0300 SODsu 2320 661. 104 a4.306 126.66677" 3 12 s $42445

23 000 .6Cl- oo: os...ro2I- 06.r~ 400g 6 4.566 0300 667 2630 1g01 S4.,74 $1.6.$4 1516'4 12176 S22.060 14245S23 EOCOO •=J.6060 s..0 -~i' 0431o i" r g.6.ol•IS 06 62.402 6 030 1 7736 56075m 13*, 6.54• 1114|..6* 66.441 OS5.6 1424325 E00O C60J.60C• bo66o.. 0l.3* 0" Or .06o.2 06 0 . 1 40,40 0500 667 1670 34.300 1•44.7 66.1S4 1t66161 17.306 147.7171 4245r20 0 6.7 .063 7 26.063 6661.013 66634 13.130 e1s,115 6 01 I1425 0 CO~.STJ" 6650..07o• 003046.r5.64466rag 63666•'o• 6 34..02 6 060 6 2.(080 660.OQ 1l62.045 *6.634 I14,4,,33 66l.66l 3636 1 T. I4245

Cp0| 0C.-p` lr $2TM-BA& 1b. 1S 2-9 1 7 7"$.76 4 4g 4. 14 .5

23 EDOCOC6 1 00P 6, .- O.31..g.0*6 63006l 6 42.00 6 0500 67 2 0 7. 1A 4 1*0 20425 0 0 66 0 .000 .17.73 16154 14."66 14,4 "6 1476 1M245

25 EDCOCOIJ.0C0onwp ?0,66466.0 o 71650 6 60 67 45* 3.04 2.2 664024 6.4 3 4423 00006.60070600..6, 6*03. S 6." 6 060. 6 30.450 6 0500 66.7 2220? 16520 266.701 165 14.216 166 457.060 14245

25 ~ ~~~ _" 6T _.-.3 .0 0 0 s o .15 " .02 0 .- 4

P-.160

Page 80: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX A- 13 Equipment Inventory

A-13 Revision 0

Page 81: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

AfP~endix A.13

M1SC9LLANrEOus lT~m VOLUME ESTIMATESHoneyweH Metropolis FacWt,

KAISER MATERIAL PERCIENT EISWROM ROL eOOESCRIPTION LOG OF OF BLK LIMT UNIT TOTAL TOTAL DIRECT DISPOSAL DISPOSAL

CODE UUTS UITS CONSTRUCT. DENSITY IT VOLUME WEIGH104 VOUM & URY WEIGHT VOL.1MI llb1 061 W03 "6 r %) O bi% em 133

EW.pmeadl Average Ove, Etir Base Bademvt I *q* led 6,134 FM-S.e-eeR-123 Refigerermnwazer I s FM.tIFbeoR-123 Refrigeranut Analit I FI.ld Floo

Corege BeWV I Es FM-1 Flee,Prepared Feed Elevator I Ea I FMId Fleer

A UF4R evilor I E I FM-I stFrBed Recycle BElveor 'I E. I mIRFle

Mied Feed Elkvuor I 6. I FIUldFlwPassenger Elevalor E I FM-lw Flee

FruightE vUtor I I. 1 FM-leel.*UF4 Feed Srew-3rdFloor I Ek I F.IdtFloo

Gren Sal Feed Screw- 2nd Floor I E I FM-ItFloewGrow , MDIspear 2nd floor I Re I FMIdtFlooe

Ore Blnder Disc. Screw I RE I M-.itFlor"W UF4 Elevator i Ea I FW-IdFIob

Prepered Feod Drum Inveswtr Discharge Screw I RE I Flee,UF6 Col Hd. Cram - R ray & Bridge I RE I FM.IdFleoe

Cne Troley Car E, FM-Ill Feeifting Betern for Slen lan Crane e FM-Il Floer

"W HF Prehsieeer I E* I Ft Id~loe"A" Bol. Ifydoftiorinaeor Heeler I E. FIMid Fleo

4 SIe. Chase I RE FM-I lefo03 Set;l Chaed E I FM.lst FIl

Tempered WalerTank Cooing Coil I Re I FM-IdFleSemple Col Trap I Re I FIoI-Floe,

UF6 hb. ,errlees Cyt Empt.q Manifokl I E. FM-Id FleeSenle Cold Trap t Ea I FMIoFle

Unk Hower I E I FM-IItFloor09 Coole held -E•changer E FM-IeIFb

Glycol heW Eriagr e FM-le FlowOver Fed Bri Cooler I Re I F&6.IwFlee,

Econom.izer I E I FMil FlkeeR-134& Condenser e FM-I I Fe,1:

R-134a UqLid Suction in HeOWedlnge Re F&-I FloorCondeexr-R-123(Top) I Ea I FMsIdFloor

Condumer- Cooler- R-123 &R-1S4a (Sodon) ER I FM-I Flee,Cordendar- R-134 Pwrnp Doan E I FM-t Floor

12 Steam Chem I E I FMIstl Floee1 Seter Chest i E I FMldlFle

'B" HF PFteter I RE I FLO.IdtFloo"E" Bobtom IydroFwb-uor Heelem I Rs I FMIltl Fr

Flame Tower Prehleder ( Former WA) I E I FUluFlee,stiv Hoalers. Upper Seclton Cr. I E. I FM-Id Flee,Strip Heelers Upper Sedion CU. I R. I F-lltFi-,Cooklg Cols - Lower Section Cr. t ER I FM-ll FleCooing Coibs- Lower Sectdio Mr. I Es I FM-Ll Fle•,Mitt Elimnator for Vacuau Pu, I EI I FMI~d F1le,

Oxide Ve ln Fliter I E. I Fhl- I-1,UF4 VscumFI Filer Re F.. laFloor

Aslh Vac•al Clee ner Re I FM-ls FleoUF4 Vacoau e Clenus.er i RE I FW-IlFIlAshl V lCm Clesnr I R Es FM-II Floor

Oxide Vow"Clos C nom.- Dusl Colletor I RE I MIdl FloerOdd Va.cuurn Clener - Dust Colledor I E I FIM-Id Floe

UF4 Vecuum I Re I FM-IwFleeSpar Filer Fines Onxm, Durypr I E. FI IFM-ll Fle•

HotBox (East) I Ea I FIa FloHot Box (West) I E. I FMI&IFle

500 M6-E-LU, Portable Hoist I eA FM-I FleteCrae Troley Cas 1 E I FM-Is Flee

Lilfng Beem lor Sharinfhan Crane I E I F1-ll FleUF4 Mi4l- 3rdFor I E. I F%- I IsFlA

Store Saw- Type M-75 I E. FM-I:FloeBench Grinder -Omen Sky UF792 I R I FI-IM Flo

Bench Grinder - Slnl I E I FM-Ill FleeDnrumtk eeor I E I FM-1 i'l.l,

Ore Corncrete Blainder I RE I F",-Il FleerUF6 Cylinder Cart I E I FMI oFle

UF4 Drum invw or I ER I FM-IdtFleA6JtiJcdled arm foro r eors I Re I FM-Id Fl.e

5mra-l - ast I E FM.Il 6loorM -" Weo I .E I FMI Ii Fleoor

Personnel Funnel Com for Above I E I FM-I FIleo10,0010 Cap _Mo -oreil Meki Are I e I F-IlM Fi-,

2O0CoCap -Monoral. Spw Recycle Are* I r. I Mi lFle4,500 Cop-Monor-l. A" Green Area I E. I F-llt Floo,

9,500i Cop- Mononed- G.E. Dissoc. Retorts I E I FMI.lFIee,4,50 Cop- Monoral- -A- Green SalArea I e I Fls llMFIo

4,0006 Cap - Monorail - r" Refrigeraion Area I E I FIMId Flte,#2 Vacu Puwrp I Re I FM-IiFloe

Cooing•Aikr lower. Earst I RE FIM-Ist Fl-,Coing Air Slower - West I E FI dltt For

G(ycoI C-c. Puwp - Basement I RE I F-ll FlR-123 Getr Au.Oi 01 Pwi I e FM-IEM Fi-e

Bottom HyKrofjorinleor Blow t Ea I FM-IlFME•idg. Eh. Fan I FR FM-Ienl-e

Sernple Vao• m FPam I E. I FM-Id Flee,Riuus Fen - Distllation R. FM-IlFlee

Flswne Tortar VctAsmn Plmlp - 2 Id FR I FM.M FleoExRtidi Fan -.Soul Carter I RE I FM-,l Floo,

El6udl Fan"- Wod I E F-Il"r Fluordus Fan M- nlanemrce Area I E I FM. 1d Fleoo

Basemenxhalu Fan - Hollowel I E. I FM-ll FleBottomn Hydrofjorwl(or Ai Ckirueon Fan I e FM-IlFle

P. .............. .P . 0

43.7

U4.0 so.? 12U 3.0 1706.7 144.7

6GOL 37.120.0 W406.0 33.496.0 677.6U40 M130.9 3472US10 0.3.00 360A4.0 4.900A t1.6

11610 600.0 4364.0 23=.3 4.0

. =32A0 4AUS0 232.0 4.0

1e170 3134 1.7USi 2e072.0 494.0

200O` 006.7 4.U4.0 11.671.0 199lUS.0 11.$71.0 199.6

16,e 2.X0000 12.011.0 7.20.0 4732116. 3.364A ISi

USD 11,16e 0 200.3US.0 11.6e160 2003

9.0 1.629's $.S117.0 5U6.7 42

71.0 36.0 4271.0 34.0 4AS6U0 246.0 24.1

200.0 313 022002 313 02162.0 14.S0.0 SO.152O 14.A05L 95200.0 16.1011e 304200.0 1.2110200A 1.254A a320040 2.e22 14.12000 6.100 3IUS10 11.41,.0 2003US.0 11.616.0 200.3

13910 7,200.0 62AU4S 14.670.7 261126US. 1.2404. 214M2A0 429.0 62a" 426.0 6362. 429.0 64620 420.0 6.66U.0 120.0 3.158.0 1 .3w2 34A0US. 1,2602 34AUS• 1.3`02 343USl. 1,3e02 3440

US.0 7,056.0 1,643.06U.0 1,3902 343US10 4.970A4 116307740 100.0 1137"740 6100.0 11t6S.0 1. W14 We6US 1.600I.4 644US• 2.796S. 111305S40 U I

USo 11571,0 11ees1674 2.0004 12-

US40 2.40050 30S.0 1,440.9 242

5U.0 11.0 2.05U.0 400.0 20.05US0 4.176.0 72.0US 10.]002 4-2AUS 6.0272 103A54U 4.176.0 72uUS.0 2s73 44Sao Z.400 33255.0 2.400.0 333US. 267A 903

117.0 2.040 174124.0 345.0 2A145.0 172.1 12220A £12.0 23145-0 210.6 1IA133D 450.0 3AU4S0 2304 1048S.0 US10 0348-5.0 56.0 0.8US0 20640 lO0

0604o 60.0 0.1U4.0 30.0 32,0U.S 400.0 3790

S.0 230.4 10468.0 230.0 32.0

U4S0 230.0 104US 230.0 32.0US.0 2304 3255US 23104 32.054U0 z3OS 32-064A0 MID• 2512

0 0416.607 0.676 70%

70 1 100%

87 2 100:31,706 647 100%37,120 640 100%33.496 679 100%20,130 347 100%20,300 360 100%4.901 a6 1006%

496 4 100%232 4 100%233 4 100%232 4 100%316 2 100%

29.072 464 100%11,00 0 100%

11.671 200 100%11.671 200 100%.2004 12 100%7,21t 49 100%3.370 s 1006%

11,617 200 1001611.617 200 100%9,603 96 100%

002 5 100%341 0 100%341 6 100%

1.3,• 24 100%40 0 100%40 0 100%

14.677 Be 100%14,677 96 100%6,100 31 100%1,2110 6 10o01.2•10 • 10012.920 14 I00%6,100 31 100%

11,617 200 100%11,017 200 100167.220 2 100%

14,070 201 100%1.241 21 16016

420 7 100%420 7 10016429 7 10016429 7 100%100 3 100%

.Zol 36 l00%

.Zol 36 100%2.01Z 36 100%

41.494 1.543 100%2,01a 36 100%0.774 117 100%

903 12 100%893 12 1001

3.DS7 67 100%3,712 64 10010.484 112 100%

34 I I00%11,671 200 100%2.004 12 100%1.740 30 100%1,438 20 100%

11 2 100%1.160 20 100%4,176 72 100%

25,070 432 100%6.026 104 100%4.170 72 1001

266 4 1001610,280 3S" 100%19,296 333 100%

639 9 100%2.040 16 100%

347 3 100%174 I 1001661 3 100%210 2 100%462 3 I00%e0 10 10016

67 1 100%57 I 100A

50 10 10016 a0 1001%

1.906 32 100%22On 340 100%

603 10 100%

1.60 33 10DO%W03 10 100%6

1.954 32 100%

1.1114 32 100%

14,670 261 100O%

293,0267067

31.70037,12033.49520,136203004.,01

495232232232318

20,072o00

11O67111,671

Z.007,2113.370

11,61711.417

80,63662341341

1.3904040

14,67714,5776,1001,2•0

1,2602.620

6,10011.61711,617

7.22014.670

1"241420429428429

10s

2,01.

89,4142.01Z6,774

093693

3.60673.7120.494

3411,6712Z0041.7401,436

116

1.1604,176

26,0796,02"4,176

265

l0,260

630

347174

siI210462

0036707

06066

1.00422.020603

O3

1.940

14,570

4,60312

047040679347

360

444

24&4

2002001240

Is200200

16

24

00

3166

14

31200200

6226121

20

7

3030

1,543

36117

121267

04112

2W

21

2072

43210472

333

Is

333

1

323

to

I

10

032

310103210

32323232

211

c . Do,:n i"Wo•.ovvw .... ..... .... ....05-J-00. 04:45 P%,

Page 82: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

D4296Ifd A-13MWI!UANEOUS rTEM VOLUMIE ESTWMTESHoneywV Mouopol Facilty

NUMBER MATERIAL PERCENT ENVIRO ENWRODIES-CRIPTION LOC OF OF 8ULK LIOT UNT TOTAL TOTAL DIRECT DISPOSAL DISPOSAL

CODE UNITS UNITS CONSTRUCT. DENSITY WEIGHT VOLUME WEIGHT VOLUME BURY WEIGHT VOLUMEa." 0b) f5)31 b1 16731 A1I Me l1

Botom Rydro(Morulor Coo-p. Ai Blower IE.m1sI Fen- S x I

ReflgeradJon Vrt Blower IWaler Cooler I

Pon"1 A.r A rmodliomnr tR-123 CertfufI Cone•aor I

R-123 Pawe U IR-134e Purge i I

Re,,lge rw it Mar nm Sy" am IR-123 High Eff. Purge Uni I

-A ' Bo . Hy colloeerle or

AE Hy~dolmelnelo I"A" Hydironuorbistor I"8• Ed. Hyrol~ierrealr

"C Hydrolmorkador12' Fame Tower Reedor

Sepeuelor ISoala I

Swtch Board- NW ISwdtch BEoard -HE I

Sdch Board- E-Or ISwch Board. E.-

H4ig Soiler StiLow BoMier Stl I

6y2 Saeripe Voc. Pump Aurkru Tow I9I Sompow Vac. Purm Aknx* Tow

62 Prepard Feed HopperI1 PFrpered Feed Hopper

Tenlpered Wetl Twi I93 Propared Feed H=pper

Waler Trembene Chain Addln Pot IKnod Out Pat I

R-134a ReceiverR-134s AccurJlor I

Oilstilate Crade Scale IUFO C3Inw SI4ppk Scale I

Deoper FPlwn Tower Reador IRotary Vaedv - Dud Col. Disclurge I

Rotary Value - Drew Off Leg. - Bas",. IRotaryVolvoe 'A" B HFaor Disc. I

Dust Vd ve - M-410 Sper IRotary Volvo Bed Fles Hopper Disc. Rv. I

Rotay Valve -W Wo. HRl-or Disc. IDryer Olsd. MA Feed Screw I

C,•dwne Ev. Disc. Srw IPIrepred Feed Hopper Foeder Screw I

Undersized Feed Ma•erial Screw IOre Conc. Surge Hopper Dsck r Saw -N IOre Cor. SUIge Hopper DOsch. Sam -N I

U16 Cortinuou Samole Vesel-Easl IU1E Codlinuous Sarnple Vessel-Wagl

"A! Flioirt He-lerd*0P Fo~rklor Header

Serv4ce Room Hol Waler HealerT ,ripered Waler Spiraj Heal Exolunoer ITerirperod Waler Spiral Heel Excrounga I

Unit HieaterSieaun Jod" On U-430

"W Top HIEFPlaor Heator"C1 Flador Header I

Pkktzng Air To Nl Flators ISafety Show Filer I

I1 ksiwnegt Air Flier I#2 Irst ward Air Filar IWeider - Ideal Arc 250 IWeld- Do 250 1

SON0 Cap - Mile-USt - PoAMe Hold I1000O Cap -Hoist -NI

5000 cap -HOWlalSI5000 Cap - Hod - Cor Roo•n Platom I

DI Prmss IPrepared Feed Mil I

Ore Diyor Disdurmare Crusto,Scrap Recovery (114) Mil I

Prepared Feed MiAOre Prearusilr I

Motor Cortrol Cearer (C-Fr-40) I10009 Ca - Moorwa - Vate Room

20000 - Monoal - "S" Fieor I2000o Cap Monoral - 'A' Flor

Veciorn Pump - East IV-cw Purp - Weo I

Yard Safety Shower Cio. Plrp IYarM Saetoy Shower Clic. PUpT IYws Safety Shower Cir. Pur I

Safety Shower COl. Purrp IA Top HoEEl:eor Blower I

A Floor Blower I"B" Asor lower I

'E Plalor Coft. Air Blower I'' Fbilor Como. Air BlowerE.meuI Pal - Maid.t AremCoi*ro Room A/C Blower IE.h. Fe - Service Room I

EmEaE.E.

EaE.EDEs

EaE.EaEaEaEaBe

Ea

Es

EsFA

E.EmI.BEEaE.

Ea

E.B.B.B.EoE.E.EaEaEaBeE.E.EaBeE.E.

E.E.

E.EaEs

I.E.E.E6Ea

EmE.E.•

Es

B.

E.

B.

E.E.B.B.B.B.E.E.

E.EaE.eaBEE.E.Ea

E.

E.E.E.E.

Es.EE-E.B.EaEs

I FM-id Fler So 450.0 27.0I FMoIdFe 580 230n 32.0I MUid Flee 680 23103 3230

I I• 1MIdFkee 64A 63.0 6.0F'-l1l Flo- 56.0 '40.0 24.0

S FM-idImFler sob 32.4810.0 612.0I FM-PId FIle 568 16,393.8 403111 Fk-lU Flee 5410 1603431 4003

FoFM-Fl 58.0 960.0 24eAFIS-id Fl Sob 5.0 230.0 72MI-Id Flee 1566A 4,483A 412

I FM-Id Fle 166b• 483A 41oI

Fi-ldFlMeA 156. 1,4838 41I ~ l FMIals 106.0 54123J 41-1

FM-tel Fleo 164.0 9.00.0 673I FM-Id Flowr 414,1 640.1 14.I FM-Id Floer "A3 420.0 16.0FMIdFle• "83 420,0 15.0

I FM-Id Flew 580 42030 15.0S FMIld Fl•e 56A 4800. 48

I FIM1I Fleer gas 2U.03 24AI FM-i tFlowr 5.0 240.0 243I FMIdI. Flee b8 Ido.0 IllI FM-t Flee 14.03 116500.0 113.4I FM.I Floe 633 13,71::.0 165.I FM-Id Flee 773 1.216.0 1.7S FM-I Flow 77.0 1.216.0 16.7

I FM-id Flee 583 6.00d,0 GQ23I FMiel Fleer 53 6.00.0 662-6S FM-&Id Fl 743 7.111A 96.1S FM-Id Fle 583 0 0 1.0. 2AI FM-1id AFlee 01O 98 0,oI FiIdFloor 60.0 23402 9.0I F•MId Fle 6510 1,934A 50.3

FM.Id Floer l991) 20130 103FM-Id Floer 1403 25.0 02

I FM-It Floer 683 3,450.0 172.FM-Id Fluer 5"0 1503b 33I FM- 5Fleer 3.0 Gs8 1A

I Mid Floer 6583 6238 1.1I FMId F'loe 8,3 A44 0.I MId Fleer 583 -02 I 0t FM-IN Flor 53 66.9 1AI FM-I stFbee 5830 583 13A

I 2M-d Fl 120b 9423 7?.I FM-2nd Fleor 5830 64A 73

S FM2.d Fluor 120. 1.319.6 11-0I FM-2nd Floor 1203 27332 22JI FM-2e•UI•e 69,1 1700.0 31AI FM-2.d Fe 5866 1,700.0 3131 FM-2 Floe 215A 1.500A 7A1 FM-2,4d Fle 216.0 1.500.0 7A

FM-2Sd Fle 483 6.760.0 1440FM-32d FI 580 S.767 .0 1440Fl&2nM File 983 154.0 IFI 2rd Fle A3 1774.3 703.7

I FM-2nd Fe MIA 14.074.3 703.7I F2Sd Fleor 54.3I FM-d Floer 583I FM-bW Fleer So3 I100.0 75.I FM-2d Fleer 58 17.200 043I PM-3 Flee 67.1 1730 02S PM2nd Fleer u2.3 290.0 3.1

FM-2nd Fleer 9 Do. -0.1I FM-Sad Flew 9 6.0 0.1

I FM'2ed Fleer 583 375 a

F'M-n Floer 83.0 376 6I FM-3Mlee 5~M83 5 I

FA-2nd Fleor W00 12•.0 23FM-32Fleer 121.1 60.0 05

I FM.2d n 12130 60.0 08I FM-3nd Flee 583 250.0 16.7I FM-2d Fhlee 603 7,600.0 126.0I FM-,d Floeer 23 2.500.0 3030I FM-32 Floer 8338 2.500b 30D3

F m-2•d Flo•e 603 7,500,0 126.0S FM2nd Fleme 58. 2,0003 45.0I FM-2.d Flee, 530 1,96.0 90At FM&.23 Fier 145A 2583 1sI FM-3M FIe 145A 129A 0.2I F2ed Fleer 1453 I503a 13I PSI-3 Fleer sea 1.20230 2430I FA-2,d Fle 5o8 1.392.0 243I FI&2Mloor Selo 91.1 IsI F&MlW Feor 54A 61.1 1 AI F M2nd R-F 11 583 1.1 1.8

I Fn2M d Flee, 583 114.0 2AFPM-M2d Fle 58.0 60003 So

I FM-32 Flee 506 2.940.0 2043I FM-2d Floor 6430 29403 2943I FM-2d Fleer 543 27030 27.0I F.PSid Fleo 71430 212.1 2.8I FM-2.d Fl- 580 0.0 11I FM-2d Fle, 1103 S0.0 0.6I FM2 Floor son 60.0 1i

Pegs 2 eE C

1,560 27 100%,I658 32 100%

1,58 32 10011349 6 10091

1.460 26 100G47,094 $12 100%2,7541 410 100%23.760 410 I00113'M 24 100%

416 7 100%4,406 42 100%6,496 42 100%6,496 42 100%1,496 42 100%9,006 67 100%

812 14 100%

470 16 100%670 10 100%670 1 100%

27114 4 100%

I.382 34 100111302 24 100%1,044 16 100%

1k443 113 100%13.761 ISO 100%

1.209 16 10011120 to 10011

38,420• e43 1001130,426 83 100%

7.111 96 to0038.426 843 1001

61 1 100%622 9 100%

2,917 .0 100%2.003 i1 100%

20 0 100"10,005 173 100%

191 3 100%s8 I 100%64 1 100%02 I 100%62 I 100%58 1 1001

948 e 10011

404 7 100%1,320 11 100%2.736 23 100%1,"44 32 1O0%1.044 32 100%1,5% 7 100%1.506 7 1009

0.362 144 10091.352 144 100%158 2 100%

40.,16 704 100%40.816 704 100%

75 1 1001900 1e 100%

4,350 76 100%3.712 64 100%

17 0 100%200 3 100%

0 0 100%9 0 100"1464 9 100%

44J4 9 100%

34 1 1001120 2 100%

a1 I 100%I1 1 100%

96 17 10O%7,660 120 100%2,490 30 l0012.490 30 10%7,S60 126 10o%

2,610 46 100%0.644 96 100%

201 2 100%131 1 10o%145 1 1001

1,302 24 100%1,392 24 100%

93 2 100%03 2 1001•03 2 100%

118 2 100%4.940 8I0 100%

17.052 294 100%17,052 204 100%

IS8 27 10o%213 3 100%110 2 100%67 I t00%

110 2 1001%

1,9861,356S

3481,450

47,00623.76823,769

1.392418

6,4868.4966.4866.4960.006

812070670670

2,7641,041.3921,39)2

1,044

16,44313.761

1,2091201

38.42538.426

7.111

36,42091

6222.817Z.003

2810,006

191586452625468

4001.3202,7341,644

1.8441.5051,505

0.362

15840,91140.916

76ow

4,3503,712

17

4644 64

34120

at61

7,90

7.6602.6106,604

261131146

1,382

1,3029393

119

4,04017,05217,0521,666

21311067

110

2732324

2'5412410410

247

42424242

6714

IsIsls

48242416

113

1 9

16I

6096

30

173

3

2332327

4144144

704

7041

lo75

64

36

0

12

2

17

12so

3012045

27

24

212

WWO-ftw4mew.Opw 0•,&A-00, 04:45 P1

Page 83: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

APoP.*ft A.13

IAISC!LLANEOLS TT!M VOW?4E ESTIMATESHoneyvnN Matopokl FacUlty

NUMBER MATERIAL PERCENT ENMRO DMAR0DESCRIPTION LOC OF OF BULK UNIT LINT TOTAL TOTAL DIRECT DISPOSAL DISPOSAL

COOD UNLITS UITS CONSTRUCT. DENSITY WEIIQT VOLUME WEIGHT VO0UMI BURY WEIGT VOLUME00,132 0 1) 001b 72 11) WXitb) IR

Man-Cooang PF1'W Top H4PFlsor Air Cim. Fren

Co4r" Room Fm I"C" Fldor Hed Circ. Ar Slower I

"'C Flmor Hee Cont. Air BlowerDrf*ng Wter Cooler I

Reftgerdeor. Cofto Room IRefrigeraor - Car. Room- Forermun

A/C & Heeaf UnitAOC & Heallft Urd

"W Top H-4lorOra Crustm Gfz/s1y Scree

Camnbw Gr IeyScrap Recovwry Screw&&tdhbm:d - N X E

b8cttowdc- N X WSid*owd - N X W

Dryer Srg Hopper IU06 Blow Off & Damp To.*

Bad PFim -Scap Reacwy Hopr I

Safely Shor Haee Storage Tre IO0e Cort Surge HopperI

A" Fhmor Bed.- Vfbor18' FPAt Be•d - v~bnorI"B" Top H-FIior Disc. LA. - Vreor I

LUldersire Feed Mde Scrwe - Vitndor I*C" Fbior Bed- Vibraor I

Ore Conc. - ge Hopper. N- Virator IOre Core. Srge Hopper - S - Virator I

Cone. Blendu Feed Lw - Vibrator"A* Bottom H-Flaor Feder

in - Rarge Discharge IScrap Rec. Mil Feeder

Fin Disdtarge I'A! Firor Spar Feeder

"B Flior IN FPeeer'A* FIaor Ut4 Feeder I

"W Flmw Spar Feeder"" BoSom H-Flor Feede -

C Flitor LI4 Feeder I'"C Flelor Spar Feeder

Ore k"Rnge Disdarge IOre lr-Range Disisige I

'A' Reolddzor ScrewFlbar r er FPre Sew I

Ore Dryar Feed Screw*S' Roodizew Screw

Ore Clbsooi Feed ScrewHNo Troley IHoist Troley I

ra Drye IF~earDryer

Ore Oy Healer IA Top H0o11 Had Hee.

High Boiler 80 CondermerM20 Filer For Metal Tube DiP Tail. E I

H20 Flier For Metal Tube DIP Test - WHHo Gycol Filer I

Decon Tnmw Vacuurm IWelder I

Hot Box5WDO Cep. Poortabe Hotel 1

4000R Cap Hoiet I20000 Cap Hoist 110D00 Co, Hols I10000 cap. Hoist I

I1DOWCap. Hotel- Electric IScrap Recycle Drurn rvlOert. I

2.500 . Monlora I2.000 Cap. Moormcml4

,50D Cap. Monoratil4.000 Cap. Monorel I

Monorail I4.000 Cap. Mon~oralI

Dryer Contuslin Air Slower'A' FlOlor Offigl Laws Coolrg Slower

.. redu Fen - Sewsc RoomE•tFehed Fan - Doom

Wall Exvust Fan. South¶Wall Eaamuf Fen - Wes

9317-1 Vert Lk*Etausl FanEsAlso Fem

Decon eSd BlsteolE~duueFen I

"W Top HImor ccaribuintor Air Slower IWa! Eatwos Fm. Souowest I

DI644n Cooler I'A" Top HfIdor I

4R Dis, Preaed Feed Ai CssltflerW DIe. Preperad Feed Air C•so'nr I

Seebdtroer East-West IS~ldboerd Eadf-EassI

E.EmEmEs

E.lE.E.EsE.EmEmlEsE.E.E.E.lEaEsE.E.E.EsE.E.

E.EmEaEmlI.EsEmFAE.EaEeEsEaE.E.E.E6EaE.E.FAEaE.EaE.I.E.E.E.E.E.E.•E.E.E.E.E.

EeE.

E.E.E.E.E.E.E8EaE.

Em

E.ExE.E.E.E.E.E.Ex

E.Es

S.S.

EmE.EaEaE.

Es

E.

F1.2Ad Floer 680 14110 I1FIM,2d Floor US 2.I16O.0 2160

I FM-2nd Floer 68A 270. 270I FM-2. Floer S10 2.040A 264AI P-264PFoor US 270`0 3770I FM.2nd Flow 11U 133 11I PF2nd Floer Ii 133 11

I PM.2., Floer US m.200 3050I FP2nd Flor US 4.200 106.0

FI-2Ad Floor 192A 7.6533 41lM2I d Floor US 6 1M,.0

I FP-2n Flowe .US 726S 12.5FI P2nd Flee 6US 1.2665 30A

I FM-2nd Fow USA 1.306.0 136.6

1 .2bnd 641.0U l1OoS IgeI FM-2.d FPI 6US0 BOOS`0 BOS

FI-2nd FloPb 97.0 2.01.9 202F -2.d Plo 6U0 2.760 376.0FP62rnd o 7110 64U. 7"F-2M Floor 144`0 1.092. 7.6

I F*d2nd Pb.w B.0 16.000.0 26BAI F2nd P. 123.0 B.0 0.1I FP-2rd Pb. 123,0 9.0 0.1I FM2nd Floor 12320 9.0 0.1I FM-2.0 FPbr 123.A B. 0.1I FM-2.d Floer 123.0 9C0 0.1I FW2.2 FPb. 1235 C.0 0.1I FP12n PFlow 123.0 C.0 0.1I FPM-S Floor 123.0 C.S 0.1I M2.d Floer 366465 B100 2-2S FWr42 Floor 36085 COO 22I FM-2nd FloP 345 B00.0 2.2I P6 1-d Flee 32.0 905BO 2.21 FM.2d FloPb 85.0 00C0 2.21 FM-Pml Fi 3Pb. 0 90C 2.2S FlM62d Flob 26110 B00S 2.2

I P-2.d FPo. 36..0 1100 2.2I PI-2nd Fb. 3480 COOS 20 2

F'P 1.d Flowr S685+0 C00S 2.2

I FM-Sod Plow 3085 000.0 2.2S F-2nd Floor 354b 0 01D.0 2.21 FP143d FP- 120. 942.5 72

1 F -i• id•Flor 120.0 942. 72I P34 Fl. 120P0 2.2610. IBS0I FM-3d F'loor 60 4US 0.0 216.0I PF-24 rF 6l+0 50.0 102 0I FM-3rd Pb. 7550 226.0 32

I FM-3,d Fkoo 75.0 22S.0 3.01 F'M3,d Fl-o 58.0 36,000.0 1,096.0

I P14.3rd Pb.w USe 3005A I"DSF P1.2.4 Flee USO 2.00050 144S0

I FM-3- Fb. US.0 I0,000.0 172AI F'-3,d Floor 5U0 5.710*0 1445AI F.3rd Floor 120.0 942 O0

FM-3r Flo. US0.0 63.3 1.AFM-3rd . USA 63.3 1 .I

I P61.2rd F6- US 022 1.1I FP,3-d Pb. US 63.3 1.1I F-.3rd Fb. 41 39040 9.1I FM-3rd P. US0 1,1745 20.31 P6-2,d Floer US0 U I1 FP31d FPb 226.0 150.0 0.71 P61d Pb. E32 125D 2.0S FM--3rd Floor 1060 70.0 0.7t FM-3dFFoo 6U0 7OA 4 AI FM-34d Fle-r 63 70.0 1.1I FP53rd Pb. US 4,30.0 71.0I P Fk2. Pb. US 50.0 S .S 0I FIP- d Pb. 145b 617.6 33I F-3rd FPb 14BS 216.6 1St FM-234d Pb l4S 215A 1 AI FI63d Floor 124.0 632.6 6.1I P61.2. Pb.o 1464 GOD0* 4.3

F13-2d Fle•r 124A 172-5 1IAFM.3rd FloPb UOD 60 05

I P1.4,4 lPb USe 270.0 27.0I FM-3rd Flee. 7.0 212.1 2.1 FM-3r. Pý- 64.U 200. 32-0I P61-2.4i Pb. U 200* 22.1 FMP34d FPb $4US 544A 272

1 FIM 5•d Fhoor 54A 200.0 32.aI F-F3rdlow US0 200* . 22

FM-3rd Floor 5.0 91010 96-0FlP1.d Flo Pb ,0 200.0 3250

I F'.32d FloPb 5U 270S 27.0S M-31d Foor Pb OU 200. 32.0I FM-3rd FIe 5US0 83a CSI FM-31d Floo P.0 7.5022 1302S FMP-3rd Floor 113.0 1.600 13.3I FMP. F2o.P 72*0 220M0 44.7S FP3rd F.b- US-0 1.200*0 120AI P-3,d Floor 58.0 1.800 10 I800

Pe• 3 of

1,04412.5201.864

17.052

341133133

1.740C.0607.r20726

726

1.7407,01177,9177.C17

:.2645.220

21.750693

1,09616.114

1212121212121212

1T1

7017017907667017087i

790

24512.629

22022S

0e.322CO.B1.362

066454

64262

4300

1.17734

10812674

22

4.360Zoos

622

622

17429

484

213

1,66810578I'l76

1,0881,065

7.5921.5033.2106.960

10.440

16 100%216 100%

27 100%294 100t%

27 100%C 100%

I I Q%30 100%

106 100%42 100%13 100%I. 100%

30 :00%137 100%137 100%106 100%

CO 10I%21 100%

370 100%8 1I0%C 100%

2$ 100%0 100%0 100%0 ioQ%0 100%0 100%0 100%0 100%0 100%2 100%2 100%2 100%2 100%2 1I0%2 100%2 100%

3 100%2 10Q%2 100%

2 100%2 100%2 100%B9 100%20 1010%

10 100%

16 100%0 100%13 100%07 100%

144 100Q%17 I100%A

14 100%

I 100%1 100%1 100%I 100%C0 100%

I I DO%1 100%2 1001%1 1001%4 10(0%1 100%

20 100%36 100%

2 100%2 1 00%& 100%6 100%

I 100%I100%A

B 100%27 1 00-A2 1 00%32 100%

27 100%22 100%

32 100%27 ¶00%32 100%

a 100%131 ¶00%

12 100%46 100%A

126 100%100 100%

1,04412.621

1,6817.062

1.606

34000

1,740

7,626

726725

1,7407,9177,917

6,220z.0o

21,750503

1,0601.104

1212121212121212

7"1

701

Too780701790798701709700711701

9"

01

646

22622020

0.362

0,362

1,58

6464

64240

1,177

348¶26

742S22

Is4,3W0

622210

21B622

17?4

26•464

2131.8"I's8

1.508

6.6611

3487.6021,0322,219

10.440

21627

26427

3010642

1315320

13713710t

9021

3760C

208

0

000

0400

0222

222

22

2

2161I3

10

t72144

20

26

2

4

75

324

26

23

27222

32

122

329632273226

III1345

1201

06-J,-00, 04:40 PMC NY DoMe-aaole• .OPW

Page 84: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

Appmwdb A43IMSCELLANEOUS flEM VOLUME ESTIMATESHoy-.N MetrUopols F&ci

NUMBER MATERIAL PERCENT ENfVIRO I6DESCRIPTION LOC OF OF BULK UNIT LUNT TOTAL TOTAL DIRECT DISPOSAL DIS

CODE UNITS UNITS CONSTRUCT. DENSITY WEIGHT VOLUMlE WEIGHT VOLUME BURY WEIGHT Voam"03 Clb1 Qb)2 WX, Ow3 %)15 (1b) I

Ultrasonic Clr 1Tink - DeoDryur Food H~opper I

#1 StRI Feod T4 i22 566 Feed TlI IBOd Finn H-oper I

Spar Discd*Wg Hoppo I.X3 S1 Feoed Trk I

Dryer Food Hoppr Vibor - Weal I'A* Reoodz Screw Mac.k Vi•rator I

8r Finior P Inmy Filer Disch Vixator IW FPlatc B.U. Filet Dish. Vibrator I

"A! FPlor Prinwy PFilo [*K Vrbaor i*A P B8w 8.U. Filte Dlsd. Vrator I

F-416 Cirharge Lina Vibaor I"C2 Pa5w Plnwy Flter DO. Vibrator I"*C1 Fior PrlttIny Pilor D.0, VIbolor

Dryot Foed Hopp Virtor - Enst'A! Few Prinrary Filer Dis.. RAN i'A* P5 Prknwy Foter Dld. RN I"W Ploor Primoy Plor Clo, RN i"8" Fltor P w Filte Dfs¢• RIV

Sper Recycle cdk. RN I"C' Ptor Princary Plotr DCld RN i"C' FPlaor PrInwy Ploer Cids. RN I

scrw conwesyo IC Kwirate lotr Fines ScrewRole% FPod Screw i

Mud BaIer Feed Screw iWHo Troley. -A' Groan SalI

A4 Prlnmy Cold Trap, iA42 Pfinwy Cold Trap iA43 PInnmy Cold Trap i

Produa Condensr I44 Plrmy Cold Trap iB-2 Pfunay Cold Trap iB-3 Prinwy Cold Trap IB-I Primary Cold Trap iB-4 Primnay Cold Trap i

AL Pdrnwy Cold Trap. Nootot I"9E Hydrogen ProlWr I

W8 Redicr Heo•o t. sIfac. Cont.Inslntlued Air Ptar I

Chem. Trap - Phm.w Arlzer ICem. Trap - Flkmrin Anmlzer IChom Trap - Fluorie Analiz IChmmn Trap - FPwir Anaizot I

Charm Trap - Soerle PointiCheOm Trap- Fkloin Anwiz I

Ai Fier IWlder -•€ eaten 400 IWekW-400 arnp dick I

Hot BoxE-409- A-41Priary Cold Trap Hal BoxE-408- X2 Pirmy Cold Trap Hot Box IE-410- A,3 Prinmy Cold Trap Hot Box IE-427- A-4 Primwy Cold Trap Hot Box iE-426- 6-2 Pfirnary Cold Trap Hot Box IE-425- B-3 PA5ury Cold Trap Hot Box

Disilaon Wed - Hot Box iDitllatialon East - Hot Bint

E-000-61, Pftrwy Cold Trap Hot Box IE-492- 8-1 PRinrwy Cold Trap Hot BoxE-493- "-4 Prirny Cold Trap Hot Box

VA-E-L-UI - 500 CapHold - -A! Graon Sal Train - 20000 Cap. I

Hoist - Cold Trap AreaHold-Cold Trap Are I

#1 Mud bIler- WstS2 Mud beater - Fal I

01 UF41 VAi- North IUF4 Blender I

#2 UF4 Mi- Soýdh63 Mudballr - NorthI

Monorail - Over A-3 Prim. Cold Trap, 30.000 IMonoral - Ove 42 Prim. Cold Trap. 30.0006 IMworall - Over X1 Prim Cold Trap. 30.0000

Monoril - Over Rotex Screen (,S-00), 3,0D00 IMonorl -WAý G. Sell Are, 2.,000

Monorall - 8-3 Prin Cold Trap iMonormi - A Bot. Hflomuiuor

Vac. Pomn - LIM Fkorin Armaizr IVac, Punp - Sonple Pot i

*A" Redmior BlowerE?.. Fm - HIAra -West Wa IEmit Fen -HOAre o-SotO Wal I

Bu41.9 Ventila•ion Unit IMan Cooling Fan i

"ir Reducdor Comb. A•r BlowerFxtIus Fan - SoA X Wes - I Lg I

Clindrng Water Cooler I01 UF4 Mil Gr.ley I6 2 UF4 MAl Cwtxzy I

Spar (Bed) Rolex ScreenRolex Screen

Swiltchboard C-19 West

Eat.EtEaEDEmEsE.t.EaE.

EsEtE.E.EaEaE.E.EaEtEsEaEtEmEtEdEmt.toEmEsEaE.E.EmEtEtE.EaEtE.E.EttxEat.EmEaE.E.E.

EsE.E.I.tozE

I.E.EsEmE.E.EaE.E.E.E.E.E.EsE.E.E.

t,E.EtE.E.E.E.E.

Ev

E.Em

E.

EaE.

t.

BEtoto

BaE.

I Ml31d Floor 56. 300.0 440OI M-3d MW 54.0 1.620.0 964S FP143rdFlot 212 8.710.0 41.0S FP6-3rd Fler 212.0 0,710.0 410I FP-3rd Fle 64.0 0.400no 312.SI 6-rdFlowr 5. 2.400.0 120.0

Fi6-3rd FAOm 212. 01710.0 41.0W-3.d Fie 123.0 a.0 0.1

I P63rd Floe 12L.O 905 0.1I P66.3rd Floow 1234 6.0 0.1I FP-3d Floo 123.0 9.0 0.1I F663d Floor 122.0 0.0 0.1I FMl-3d Flow 123.0 0.0 0.1I P6-3r Floor 123.0 a. 0.1I M3rd FIaor 123.0 9.0 0.1I FU3rd Flowr 1231 Ia. 0.1I FM3d Flo, 123J1 9.0 0.1I P51.3d Flowr 360D 90010 2.2I FM-3rd Flo ' 369 80000 2.2I FI-3ld Floor 3M.0 00.0 2.2I Ff3rdFlev 31•6•1 90.0 Z21 FP63rd Flo 300A 000.0 22I FP&3rd Flow 368.0 0000 2.2S F&3.rd Flo• 360. 800.0 2.2

I 4 Floor 12011 $64,. 5.I FMP- Floor 120b 412.3 3AI FP4.4 Fl- 661 400.0 7?I P114h Floo 250 2.000.0 7AS FM-48h Floor 76.0 64.2 0.7I FMP-4 Fioor 971 2&34.3 273I FM4P4 Fkl 97,07 2934.3 273I PM-48, Floo 10 26343 27.31 PIA48, Floor 50 0.0 0.7I FI6f-4Floor 17210 4.700.0 27.31 FP.4 Floo 172.0 4.700.0 27.31 FM-44h Flm 172 4700.0 27.3I F11480, Flew 172.0 4.701.0 2731 FP-4.48 Floor 172.0 4,700.0 27.31 F14441% Floo 172.0 4.700.0 2731 FM-4 Flow r .0 400.0 6A1 FM-48 Floo 90.0 374.0 4.7S FP.-48h Floo 900 .0 0.1

I FM.-48 Flo 0.0 6.0 0.1I FMP14. Flo 91u0 as 0.1I FM.48, Fl 00.0 0.0 0.1I FM-44 Floor Ds 1.0 0.1I p14-48 Floo 91) 8.0 0.1I FM-48, Flor 00.0 0.0 0.1I F14. 710.0 262A111 291I FM-48, Pl 42.0 391.0 .3I FM.448 FloOr 42.0 351.0 0.3I FM-4h 8Flow 64.0 31.1 0.6I FM-48 Foor 81.0 320.0 32.5I F-4h Flo 5.0 320.0 22.0I FP6-44h Fl 5.0 320.0 22.0I FMP.48 Fl-oo 50.0 320.0 32.0I Fkt.lh Flo•o A.0 320.0 32.0I FP448 Flr 56.0 320.0 322.1 FMP.48 Floo 50.0 1.300.0 13011 FP-4, Floo•r 81 1,300.0 130.01 FMP4, Flo .1 3".0 32.01 PM-f8 Flo 51.0 320.0 32.0I P14.48 Flo 51.0 320.0 321I FllQ4 Fwo 51.0 Go II FP-48, Flo 5S.0 12510 211I W~ h Fi-8Plo 58.0) 6 1I PM-40, Flo 51.0 66 II FM-48 Fl.OO 580 4.00m.0 1201I FM-48, Flo 65.0 4.000.0 0.0I P14 Fl-oo 58.0 4.872.0 SAMI P44 Flor 64580 10.500.0 1001I Fl-4lh Floo 540 1.120.0 140.0I FM-48 Floor 585 4,000.0 75-0I FM44h FIo 1060. 2.600.0 23.5I P66.48 Floor 1011o 250010 23.5I FPk48 FPlo 101 2.500.0 23SI FM-48 Fl-o 6210 . 2500 3.2I FM-48 Flo- $.0 1 1501 2AI P-48, Fl-o 1011 1,126.0 lOSS FP-.4h Floor 6.0 230.0 35I fP-481, Flo 581 13016 2.3t FM-48, For $810 2030 3S.I P44h Floo 515 z2.5200 2521I fktAM Floo Se 26.7 2.71 FIP6•% Floo 640 20.7 2.7I FM-41h 1`5-r Floor 00.0 1200I FM.th-4 Fk- 4 0 8,Plo10.0 1 0I l-48,Flo 5,11.0 14113 22-5S FP-48, Floo SEA1 200.0 3221I pM1h.8 Floor 5810 03b 61I FMP48 Floo 58A 3.00.0 3600 01 FM-48, Fl- 54.0 3.600.0 3401I FMP.4 Flo r .0 5 6401D 41AI FP-4.8 Fl-o• 510 $40A 041I FP-4, Floo 580 2a620.0 2520

P"o. 4 0 1

2.704

10,1256.900,6*2

12121212121212121212

7W7aM7"780700788788

6604064r8

2.016

63

2.6`42Z640

41

4,11M4,896

4,6914,6064.6966

400376

0I

2.2,60

36936031

1.11611,0061.1056

7,5407.6401.11"1.m56

341.2io

3434

6,m606.2204,072

34.000%1204.350

2.491

2.491

1901611

1.124231133203

14,616157157

110

1,3051.855

34820.04020.019

4,072

4.67214.1is

48 100%se 100%41 100%41 100%

313 100%120 100%41 100%

0 100%0 100%0 I00110 100%0 100%0 100110 100%0 100%0 100%0 100%2 100%2 100%2 100%2 100112 100%2 100 %2 100%6 100%3 100%8 100 %0 100%1 100%

27 100%27 100%27 100%

1 100%27 100%27 100%27 100%27 100%27 100%27 100%7 100%6 100110 100%0 100%

0 100%0 100%0 100%0 100%0 100%30 100%

9 100%0 100%'1 00%

32 100D%S2 100%32 100%32 100%32 100%32 100%

130 100%130 100%32 100%32 100%32 100%

1 100%21 100%

I 10D%1 100%

120 100%go 100%84 100%0o0 100%

140 100%75 100%24 100%24 100%24 100%

3 100%3 100%

I1 100%4 100-42 10014 100%

252 100%3 100%

3 100%120 100%

2 100%23 100%532 1 00r%6 100%

340 100%

04 1001%64 100%

252 100%

2.784

6,602

10. 125

0.602

12121212121212121212

790lee788707676

760

No

40

458

2.12

13

2.6492.640

41

4.6664,6114

4.8964,606

400376

6

30260

31

1,644

I ass

.04!

1,6446

1,656

7,64•

1.161134

1.2113434

6,060

6.2204,072

34.000

4,3502.4912.45112.401

190151

1,12423113.1203

14,016

157157

6.540110

1.305

34820.650

20,91104,724.072

14,5111

MVROPOSALLLUME

4654

4141

313

12041

000000

0700

2

2

22222

27

211

32

2722

272727

27

272727

7600

00

30

a

0

32323232122

130130

223232

21

1209064

14075

2424

2432

II42

252

1202

2332

a360360

641

262

08-Jor.00. 04:46 PM6C.3IMY Do-r.V6 .l OPW

Page 85: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

Appandkit A.13

MISCEU.AN~EOuJS MEM VOLUMEs ESTIMATESHortaywalU Melcpopas Facilty

DESCRIPTONMBER MATERIAL PERCENT ENV1RO ENVIRO

LOC OF OF SAK UNIT UNIT TOTAL TOTAL DIRECT DISPOSAL DISPOSALCOO UNITS UNITS CONSTRUCT. DEN=iTY WEIGHT VOLUME WEIGHT VOLUME BURY WEIGHT VOLUME

Switchboard D-20 East*Vsmor - ore CarC . Hoppervt'Utor -#2 Ore Cone. Hopper I

Vior - A" Dry O~d& Dus Col.Vidbror - 81 Dry Odde Dust Col IVibraor -0T Dry Oxdde Dig Col I

Vibator. Hf Filer (F-424) Ditch. Urn IVl~dor- H- FlatI (F-425) DMrch. Urw I

*b, -W Redudor KO. Pot Disch. Lkw IVibrador- UF4 Hopper I

Vitor - Spe Doey Hopper Disch. ill IWVitor. -3 Ore Conw. Hopper

V1brldor- UF4 HopperVbbo- 'B3 Hf Fler Dirs. LkwiVtralr - 94" Hf Flaw Disrf Un oVlr•bor -B"5 Hf FIerm" Oh.: 1.kw IVtbndor - "9 HW F=I Olack Lkw I

Vi, - "'W ReddER Fies 0Ko Pot Dicd.. LUrMbraorf-k4et Lkw To 02 UIF4 MIN

Rotary Vatsr- #1 Muwer Ore BlenderRotary Vlve -#2 Murbwier Oe BlKede I

Rotary Valve - "A Top HKEFltorRoteryVelve - F-494 Pirw DiscageRotay Vove - F43 Films DUdwp IRotary Vain. F-495 Finen Discwrge I

Roteay Vsv -*1 Dry Oxd Owu Cot Hop. IRotry V . - "A' Reouador Ko Pot [Xsdi, I

Rotary Vaive e UF4 Mil Feeder- NRotIy VVies - "STOp HKEFMlor I

Rotary veie- B-1" Red. Fier P•iwe Disch. IRolay Vve - #2 UF4 Cheahr - 8

Cone. Feed Hopper ScrewWet Oxdf Dus Coledor ischawge Screw I

Troly- D-4 & B.5 HfFIierA Reoductor Filter Pkw Hopper

A-1 Test. Cold TrapA-2 Tal. Cold TrapA-l Sec. COl Trap I

"A" Reductor Healer9^4Hf HIler Heoler (FP424) ISA5 Hf Filer Hesler (F-424) I

A-2 See. Cold TrapB-1 Sec. Cold Trap 1B-2 Sec. COd Trap IB-1 Test. COl TrapB-2 Tet. CO Trap I

Shower Waler HealerA,3 Sec. Cold TrapB-3 Sec. Cold TrapSa•rrii COd Trap I

B Redudor Fler kws Hopper• 1 B ISOL. H*" Rawm 90 B- NmW:

Bol. HWle€or Raw• - Her IWRod. P-nes Hopper [Dsch, Ptg Heeler I

Top HWEFInor Filer 038 Hatter ITop H'EFIslor Fiter #48 Hamer I

# Dry Onda Dust Colecor IVessel Veuow, Hop. & Cornrolir Sivnd

A4 Bot HfI FIler IA5 Bo. Hf Filer I

Chem Trap ICheai TrapChem TrapChien Trap

k•. Air Filer I4 BoLt W Fier I

38 Top H Fer I68 Top I Fier

S otom W FilPer IWelder - Idealrc IW elder. -dealarc I

Hoa Box - Cold Trap E-446-1A Sec.Hot Box- Cold Trap E-413-2A Sec.Hot Box - Cold Trap E41 1-IA Tet. I

Hot Sax IHot Box- CoWl Trap - E-412-2A Tes. IHot Box - Cold Trap - E-447-1B Sec.Hot Box - Cold Trap - E-448-28 Sec. IHot Box - Cold Trap- E.-472-1B Tes. IHat Box - Cold Trap - E-473-28 Ted.

Hot Box IHot Box - Cold Trap- E-601 IHot Box - Cold Trep - E-02Hoa Box - Cold Trap - E-603

Portable Hoisl -Mle-E-.Lift40000 - HolisB4 & B5 HfFilers I

20009- Hait - Over "A Redcor IHolW & Troey Over A4 & A5 H FRe I

40000 Hoisd & Troley Oven 83 Hf Filer I10001- Hoist. Rotery Va. Storage Area

IOOO Cap-portable Hoist1OON Cap - Portable Hsl I

20,000 • Monoral - Over Cold Trap 2B Te. I20.000X Monorail - Over Cold Trap IB

20,0001 Mono -Cold Trap 25 See. & IA Ted.

EaE.EaEaEsEd

EsEsEd

E.E.

EaEsEsEREsE4

E.E.EAEa

EsE.EaE.E.E.E.EaE.E.BeEsE.

Be

E.E.

Be

E.E.

E.E.ElE.E.EaEP

Be

Ea

Be

E0

E*

Be

E.E.

Be

ElE.E.E.E.

Be

EmE&Em

ElE.

EsE.B.E.E.B.

BeBeBe

E.EsE.E.E.E.E.EaE.ElE.ElE.E.EsE.E.

BeBeEr

Er

Es

I FM.41 Flees 18 2`020 252.0I FM-40 Flera 1230 9.0 0.1

I FM4 Flee 123.0 9.0 0.1FM.41 Feer 123.0 .0 0.1

I Fis. Fleer 123.0 1.0 0.1I FM-46 Fleer 123.0 9.0 0.1I FM4el Flees 123.0 9.8 0.1I FM-41h Flr 123.0 9.0 0.1

FM4.4s Flee 123.0 , 01FM-41h Fb 123,0 9ý.0 0.1

I F.41h Floer 123.0 98 0.1

I 1 r4 4 F e r 1 2 3 .0 g 0 0 .1FM-44h Fle 1238 9.0 0.1P-1Fe 123.0 ,0. 0.1P1411 Fle 123.0 0.0 0.11 M1J- Fleer 123.0 9.0 0.1F%-4di Floo 123.0 1.0 a.I

I FM.4I Fleor 123.0 9.0 0.1

1 FB P-411 Flee 123.0 9.0 0.1I F11.41h Fle 91.0 67.7 12S FM.44h Firr 91A 7.7 1.21 F1-41h Fleer 1.a0 72.6 1.3I FM-41 Flow 91.0 72.6 1.31 11411 Fie 91.0 72J 13t FM-41 Flr 6.0 72.8 13I FM-41 File MIA 728 1.3I F11411 FlW 98.0 72.5 1.3I FM-44h FIror "A8 728 13I PM411 Fre 918 72.6 13S FM1-4 Fealer .0 728 183

I FMP411 Floor 6.0 72.8 1.3I M-. Fue 120.0 2107.7 18.1I FM-1 FIrer 1208 1.131.0 IA1 M-.h Fle 77.1 94.0 0.7I FP-1 Fre 918 120.0 2.0o F&61-, Fre 74.0 4,700.0 638I FM-61h Flow 74.0 4,700.0 63.I F1-91h Flfe 74.0 4,700.0 13.1I P111 Flee 6s.0 1.400A 2010.0

F -I*-% Floor 391.0 440.0 118I F1-611FI- 38.0 440.0 11.I P1-M Fe 74.0 4,700.0 0321 PM-11h Flie 748 4,700.0 6381 MW Fl•or 74.0 4.700.0 63A1 FPl101 Fle 748 4,700.0 63AI Flfi01 Fleor 74.0 4,700.0 13AI M.61 Floer 13.0 164.0 11.I PI1-0h Fleer 748 4.700h 138I 11'-69fOoler 74.0 4,700.0 138I PFW1h Floe 748 4,700.0 638I F-1h Fl- 68.0 120.0 2.01 P.011 Fler- 408 30.0 7.8S F'-,6 FIrer 40.8 3.0 78AI FP-S11 Fl- 40.0 300.0 78I FP1-.01 Fie 40.0 30.0 7.6I FMP151 Fle 40.0 30.0 7.61 P91601 Fle 69.0 6.930.0 1,31.0I M-14 Fie S18D 5000 40.0

F F1hFIeet 1198 1.3018 11.8I F&I.O11 Fl- 119.0 1.3118 118I FP• . Fle 748 4.700.0 13.81 FMP.5h F$e 74.0 4,700.0 13.8I FM-P4h 1 Flier 74.0 4.700.0 138I FM-51h Flee 74.0 4.700.0 138.I FP-611 Fleer 74.0 4,700.0 633.1 FP11 Flee 116. 1is02 13.3I FM-5th Fla 116.0 I.S362 133

-1 .h Fnr- 116.0 1.53612 13.3I FM-P1h Flre 111.0 1.022 13.3I F M-Oh Flee- 42.0 321.0 931 FP1101 Flow 428 391.0 0.3

F1 FFleen 98 199. 0 342FL4P01 Fleer 91.0 199.0 34.2

I F -&10 Fle 51.0 199.0 342I FIM. Flo• 9.0 1998 34.21 FW-O Floor 8.0 1998 342I P91.11-1 Flre 018 1998 3481 PM-11h Fbrr 91.0 191.0 34.2I Fh-% Flow 51.0 109.0 3421 F&&54 Fi- Sao 199.0 342

1 P1051 Flo.r 918 19980 342I FPS5 FIe 51.0 199.0 342I FP5.51 Plo 918 1991.0 342

1 FP-W Fle 5e.0 199.0 3421 FP11.51 Fow 98.0 199.0 342I FM-54h Fl.. 50-0 91 1I FP-1 Fle 75.0 150.0 280I FP1-1 Flte 918.0 10.0 o0I FP91. Firer 758 1S08 2.0I Fh1&1-4 Fl-r 1138 10.0 13

F FW60h Fi- " 08. 13It F h thFl f68 998 1.3

F`11115 Flo 941 "'0 13I FWM-Oh Fl- 10610 1.075.0 1781I FM-511 Flene 10610 1,875.0 178

P5F1-5 Flw 108.0 3,120.0 20A

P.. . Se. o-

12121212121212

121212

121212121212121270707S76

7S7S7976797079715

2,1721,121

64Ila

4,7214.7214.721

16.240441441

4.7214,7214.7214.7214.721

1934.7214,7214,721

I16

300

30030D300300

0

2.3201210

4.7214.7214.7214.7214.7211.5431.6431.6431.543

31•

1.9441.'4

1,904

1.01"1.9641,9141,994

314

24

I'm"

3,116

252 100%0 100%

0 100%

. 100%0 100o0 100%0 100%0 100%

0 100%

0 100%0 100%

100%100%

0 100%0 100%

0 100%0 100%0 100%0 100%

100%100%

I 1 00%

tO00%1O00%1100%

I100%1 100%I 100%1 100%

1 100%1 100%1 100%1 100"%

94 100%92 100%

64 100%

12 100%64 100%64 100%94 100%12 100%

24 1DO%64 100%

a4 100%64 100%9 100%2 100%1 100%I 100%0 100%2 100%2 100%0 100%84 100%a2 10019

12 100%94 100%94 100%12 100%12 100%94 100%13 100%13 100%

13 100%13 100%e4 100%

34 100%24 100%2 100%34 100%34 100%34 100%34 100%34 100%34 t00%34 100%24 100%34 10DO%24 100%31 100%24 100%3I 100%2 100%2 100%

1 100%I 100%16 100%

1I 100%21 100%

14,61212

121212121212

121212

1212121212121212707979757575767976757976

2.1721,120

64Ila

4,7214.7214,721

16.240.41441

4,7214,7214.7214,7214,1721

1630

4,7214.721

11I300300300300300

0

2Z3201,310

1,104.7214,7214.7214.7214,7211.6431,6431,6431,43

399

3891,994

1,"411964

1,9041,9841,094

1,964

1,9141.994iN4

1.864

1'98434

ISO71

ISO147

95I.s0

3,116

C'My D--ftNtb"I.OPW O&*Jn-00. 04:46 Pt$

Page 86: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

Appendix A-13IISMILLAJ4E01,S fTEM VOLUME ESnWIMTSMeeserytie matropodls Facility

NUMBER MATERIAL PERCENT ENVRO ENVIRODESCRIPTION LOC OF OF O1JX LNIT UNIT TOTAL TOTAL DIRECT DISPOSAL OISPOSAL

CODE UNITS UNITS CO6NSTRUCT. DENSITY WEK5G0T VOLUME WEIGHT VOLUME BURY WEIGHT VOLUiE)b d1b -- 0`J31 (1)9) (W31 (1-1 1) 11,1 1111)1

20.00011Monm - Oven Cold Trap 2A & lB See. 120,0000 Mono -Cold Trip iA Sec. & 2A Tet I

11,000 MonorlOvw HfFiler A4 & AS I7.0001 Mororalt - Over HW Filer B4 & 85 1

5,000M Monoral- Over HM Flter 93 I1.OOO! Monoral - Over HMFler 6

1 0009 Moniori - Oven W Gs At" I1,000D Moorl-l. Over A Gs Ars I

MO0419 Monoral - Over (C-4 18) Mil Feed evetor IM0-420 1,0006 Mono - Over Rotary Va. Star. m I

Vac.um PunipWA' Rediclor Comb Akr Blower

Fluor Cornsxre IExhutFeFn - Sot Wld. Area IExhau Fean- WeWei -W Hfea I

Emergency E. Fn IWomense Shower E.haud Fan I

Men CooFng en I-W HF Pimaury Jet Soibber - Wes I

-Er HF Secondary Jel Scrter . Eat I"- Redulr Air ic. Frn I

ExhoustFen IWeter Cooler I

R-402 A Reducor - Surface Cormt. IR-O "Er RedLdr ISpar Rotex Screen

E.x Wet Oxide Dust Cait •2 (F-416) I

Exust FMn (P-524) 1Exhaust Fen (P-3) 1ExiidFen (P-523) I

Silch Board Nxw IMotor Coa&re Ctr Nm I#1 Come. Hopper (CtI) I

A Roduclor Filer Fines Hopper#2 Com. Hopper (East) - Coad. Boler I

IH Flier Bumi T" IIJMS SurgeTitl I

'r Reductor Filer Fine, Hopper 183 Com. Hopp- West I

V'irator- 91 Wei Oxde Dust Coa Hap. (E) IVibretor - 6 Wet Oxide Dust CoIl. Hop. (W IVlrtor - 2 Wet Oxde Dust COL Hop. (E) I

Vibraeor - #2 Wet Oxide Dust Cot. Hop. (W) IMbraior - Hf Filer -At (F-406) Msch. Lin I

VIbrllor - Hf Fier "A21 (F-407) 1isch. Line IVillbrlor- HI Flaer AX(F-419) Disct, ire. IVatmor- HWFilter "AS (F-443) Disch LineVl.- A LK4 PIm, Dust Cot. (F-426) Hop. I

Vibrator - A2 Prini FPion Fiker (FP432)Vibraor- At Prim Fleton Filer (F-433) IVibator - 82 Prim Flatlon Filer (F-408) IV tor.- 1 Pri Flabon Filer (F-409)

Vibrdor - Spin Decay Hopper Dis<h. Line IVIb. - A Filer Fines Hopper DIs Li Ine

VibIator - A Redacor Feeder IVibaor- IJ14 Prim Dust Col, (F-61l) IVibrator - "A Reolcton Feed Hopper

Vibrator - '1' Hf Filer (F-.60) 1s5. Line IVIbneor- M8 HW Fler (F-60B) Disc. Lne I

\ideaor- "9 Red. Fed Hopper (U-O) Iibrdor - W" Rod. Feeder (R-600) 1

Vibtor- E Red. Prim Flier 01 Ed IViator - CC2l Flor Prim Flier Sid/ IVibrator. "'CI Flton Prim Flter Shd. I

Rotary Va. - A Red u1cr Feeder (R-402) IRotary Vs. - A Pl•im. UW4 Duit Col. Diso. I

Rotary Va. - Ads Dust Cal. DWIc (F422) IRotary Va. - Sper Decay Hopper Discts I

Rotary Va. - 62 Dry Oxdd. Dust CoL DiscO. IRotary Va. - #1 Wet Odide Oust Cot DiSch. IRotary Va. -#2 Wet Oxide Dust Col Disch. I

Rotary Va. - et Wet DIL IRotary Va. - "B' Redul6or Feeder I

Rotary Vs. - I9 Uf4 Pin. Dust Col. OsWLRoary Va. - "Conc. Surge Hopper Feadw I

A Red udor Hopper oeed Comwr er ISpmr Decay Hopper Feed Screw I

"W" Reduacor Hopper Feed Sew IIr UF4 E~es'tor Dleck Screw IWA UF4 Elevalm Did Scrw I

"'W LiFe Elevator Sec. Feed Screw ITroley - Over "A' Red BUI Fier I

Troley - Over B.I Red BU Filer ITroley - Oven B.r Red BU Filer I

CR-401 Hoist Wd Crne IDW PrImr To Choem TrapDryer Prior To Chearl TrapDrWr Pi•oe To Ctemm Trap

11 Low Boaler S6I Condenser"A" HF Filer Heater I

"A2" HF Flier Heater I*A3' HF Fiver Heer I"A4' HF Fier Heeter 1

92 Low aiterl SU Condenser01 Dravo H&V Uri - Sw I

EaEaE.EmEsEBEsEaEmE.EiB.E.BaEmE.=

BaE:.Em

E.mE.I.E.

E.=E.

EaB.E.E.EB

B.

Ee

BaBa

E.

B.B.

BaBaBa

E.

EB

Ba

EuEBEmEaEBEBE.EBEBB.EaB.EBB.E&E.EaEB

Ba

B.EBEBEaE.E.Ea

EB

E.B.EBE.EaE.EBEaEBE.

B.

EBE*E.

Ba

E.

BaBa

EaE.E.EBE.E.

I M6t11% FleerI FM-.t FloorI FM-Il, FleerI FM•- FloorI FWM- Floe

I FM-SI FkWI FM-6 FloerI FM-O1l Flee.I FM-SIFlI FM-Gt Fleer

FI - FloorFit-I.4Sl Fine.

I FM41 FlowI FIt-6i, Flr,I FM4I, FloorI FitE FlI FM-M FleeI FM-4I FlooI FM46 Floer

I FM-5I Floe.I FM-h Floee

1 F111450, FloorI FM-5 FleI FI.•0 FloweI FI, FWt FlorI FM-I FloeI FM-S6 Floe

I FM-h FleeI Fit-suine.I 1,14,51, FleerI FM-i FloorI FM-Oe FloeeI FM-l,m FleerI FM-h FloorI FM-WiS Flee.I P1i-4g FloorI FM-SI FloerI FM,6ti FleerI FM-,4M FloweI FM-ia FleooI FM-i6 Flee.I FM-SI FleerI FM-OlFlee.I FM.-r, FloeI FM.,4h FleeI FM- Flee.I FM-5lh Floe

I M -el FO e.I FM- Flee.I FI&SM Fleer

I FM-9S FIlI FM -S I Floee1 FM-se Floer

I F'W, FloorI F1&54h FloeeI FM-SIh FleeI PM-SIh Fleer

I FM-SIh FloI FM-,5l FloorI F M- S• F l e erI F M -S I F i n e .I FI t-6S FlonrI FM-l, FineI FP-SI FleerI FM-SI Floor

1 F114.41, FIo.

I FPM-S Flo,I FM-S4 Flee.I FM-SI FlooeI FM. Fle

I FM-I,- FloorI FM-El FloerI FM-SI FloorI FM-SI1 Fine.

I FM-I FluooeI FM-Sh FleerA FM-SI Fi-o

FM-S1hI FlooeFIW-SI Fim

I FM-SI FloorI FM-IN, FloeI FM-S Fine.I FM~l, Fine

I PM-SI FloorI FM-SI Fine.I Fft-S Floe.I P1441 A-e

I FM -SFleI FMAI80 FleeI FM-SI FineI FM-SI Fine.

Fi"S aFofea

10610 30126.0 29A106.0 3,126.0 29477.0 719.0 9.3

103.0 474A4 4.6103A 431.3 421034 2680 2.M103,D 26.0 2.5103.0 264S 2.679.0 310A0 4.0

1164 172.6 1.6Sob 1304 2.350.0 120.0 12.06.0 120.0 124014o 23040 32A61.0 230.0 32464.0 320.0 14.064, 16.0 1.0$64 230.0 32.0

14b 174.0 3.064.0 17440 3.064.0 1.470.0 294-064.0 230.0 32.013A 93.0 6.061.0 I0,000. 296364.0 10.00.0 2M.361.0 165.0 2.76o.0 10.0 24S61.0 28.7 2.761.0 21.7 2.7s01l 23.7 2.7010 3.500.0 36040

6.1 1.440.0 1444066.0 2,S00.0 93.0

so0l 0.0 3.3so4 2.S0`0 03.0610 1,013A 22.369.0 6.56:.0 176.761.0 616.0 10.04-0 ,600.0 63.0

123.0 9.0 0.1123.0 6.0 0.1123.0 i.0 0.1123 94.0 0.1123.0 9.0 0.112340 6.0 0.1123.0 9.0 0.1123.0 9.0 0.1123.0 94 0.1123.0 64o 0.1123.0 9.0 0.1123.0 9.0 0.1123.0 9.0 0.1123.0 9.0 0.1123.0 9.0 0.1123.0 6.0 0.1123.0 6.0 0.1123.0 9.0 0.1123.0 04 0.1123.0 9.0 0.1123A 1.0 0.1123.0 9.0 0.1123.0 9.0 0.1123.0 2.0 0.1123.0 .0 0.1

51.0 67.7 1250.0 67.7 1264.0 67.7 1264.0 67.7 12so.l 67.7 1.268.0 67.7 1.254.0 67.7 1-26104 67.7 1258.0 0.0 1.368,0 7.7 1.2584) 67.7 1.2

120.0 7962 6.i120. e"90 751204o 1,379A 113120.0 3.127.6 26.1120.0 1.007.3 IA134 9004 4A4

75.0 042 0.77S.0 542 0.7764 542 0.7600 W79,7.6 1.16.973.0 07.0 0473.0 57.0 0l

05.0 2$72 7A)139A 3&3400 24.04040 566.0 13140.0 6660 13.440.0 66.0 1324040 51661 132

13910 3.340.0 24D500 6.COW 60040

3,1163.116

Tie474433

268261

312173133a"101

1.6413.712

641,10T

174174

17.0621.10

0316,60016.,06

167IS0167157157

20.3006,3623,6514

1613,1V41.2*3

10,249GIE

3,641212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121270707070TO70707076TO70

7929oo

1.303.1321.006

Se"63

6363

05s50

4063.336

See

560+541

3.33634.900

31 00'%29 lOO%

20 10Oft0 Ion•6 100%

4 100%3 10%3 1001%3 1oo164 100%2 100%2 100%

12 100%12 100%32 100%32 100%64 100%

1 100%32 100%3 100%3 1001

234 100%32 t00%a 0%

204 100%231 100%

3 100%3 100%3 100%3 100%3 100%

360 100%144 100%03 100%

3 100%63 100%22 100%

177 100%03 100%

0 100160 100%0 100%0 Ioo

0 100%0 100%0 I00"0 100%0 1005%0 10010 100%0 100%0 100%0 100%0 100%0 100%0 100160 I00%0 100%0 100%

0 100%0 100%0 100%0 1001

I 100%1 100%I 100%i

I 0O161 100%1 100%I 1001A1 100%1 100%1 100%I 100%7 100169 10016

12 100%20 100%

1 10014 100161 100%1 100%1 100%0 100%1 100%1 100%7 10016

24 100%14 100%14 1001614 1500614 1 Do%24 1001%

Go0 100%

3.111716474433

2"6201250312173133amas

I,@"1,9641.0m13,712

66Ill"

174174

17,062

la~ose

16,90

16700

1671607167

20,3009,3623.94

1013.6641,293

10.249910

3.664121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212127070707070707070767070

762Goo

1,31003.132

1.001

6906363630

SI

3,226

661406

664

64.000

2929

42334

22

1212323206

323

20432

296

33

03

303

221771163

00000

02

01

010

0

04

000

20

4

00

24

14

14141424

00

512jeO. 44

C,1 1 Deoiueavia8•61.OPW

Page 87: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

Appendix A-13MSCELLANEOUIS nTEM VOLUME ESTIMATESNoewyA*N Metroplais Facility

NLUMER MATERIAL PERCENT EN1VRO ENV1RODESCRIPTION LOC OF OF BULK UNIT UNIT TOTAL TOTAL DIRECT DISPOSAL DISPOSAL

CODE UNITS UNITS CONSTRUCT. DENSITY WEIGHT VOLUME WEIGHT VOLUME BURY WEIGHT VOLUMEI 1110"l Ob1 1W 0" &I (") blos %) X)1 amS

It2 OUVO H&V UPA: Be IV4 Drao H&V LA- Nw I

Top Healr FIer No. 1B H ITop Hetel Fl~er No. 29 HBr I

Redbior Filer Hit No. I"A* Redutdor BU Filer H-I.

'A' Realudor Ed Gas Cooler I"A" Redutdor EWl Gas Coole$ r

83 Low BDoler Caodenser I84 LOw Boir Condens I

A Sec. UF4 DuCo IA Redueor Backp Fl1ar

'Al Top HF Flter I"A2" Top HF Filer I

B-2 FlIorabeon Paiarey FlierB-I Fluordrelor primary Filer 1

2 Odde Dust Co I#I wetOxde Oust CoL. Pwy I

A3 Top HF Filer IAsh Dust Col

A Fil UF4 Dus CoA,-I Fluoiriseor pimary Filer 1B-3 Fluodralon Pniry Fast IAsh Vl Chater I

Ash OustC"i 2 Spa Recycle IAS Top HF FlEer I

B-2 Flborisior Bacu Fler "B-I Fluorior Bodo Filar IX1I Fbio*uior Backup FasterB-3 Fk ,osr Badop Filar I

0 UF4 Se Du CoIL IChemi Traipe IChem TraipnChem TripsChern Trap eChen TrapIChim TreatQuerm Traps IClwn. Trips I

Blow Badc Ak Filer On F-446 IC-r1 Flbioewor Printy Flar- West I

C-2 Fluorinuon Printery Filer - Caer IC-3 Fluodnor Primary Filir - EastC-I •Fkuokvor Bcuo Fler- Wet I

C-2 For•,h an Badkup Filer - CrrierC-3 Fluioslor Banckup Flier- East I

"" Reducor F Filer tr Reducdor Bbdadp Filer I

lB Top Hfleor Fier 128 Top HIwor Flier IB UF4 Pdt. Dust Col. I

IA Reductor Fri. Filer IA-2 Flui "or PrFnntay FIler - West I

A-3 Fmru,*on Pvimery FiBer - Cerd IA42 Fotr*eor Baocktp Filer - We I

A43 Fituor~etor, Baciro Filer - Carter IWester I

Hoist - 500# Cp. - Pod*e IHost-"A Rhductor BU. Fier I

Hoist - B-I FilerHois - B-2 Fler I

Hois - F-496 & F-497 Fkouleor Fier IHois - F-493 & F-494 Fluc" or Filter

Hoist AB HF FilerHol -A & A2 HFFilr I

Hoist - "8 Redudor BU Filer IHost - A2 Fr & BU Flm Flaer I

Host - B1 BU Fleuon Filer & AS HF Fier IHot - Ash Dust Col. I

Hos - Al & 2 BU & 82 PrmFlelon Flers IHois- A & B2 BU & B2 Pnk-Fton Flers

Host - "9 Red. Prf FilersHoist - "C* Fleor Prim. Filers

Hoist - "C" Fledor BU Filers I30D05 MortoradI

20000 Monorail - "C" Floon Pd Filers I20000 Morno - 'C" Fleor Sec. Filer

6000 Motrl- A & 2BU & 82 Fd Fieson FL40000 Monoara - 81 BU Fletion & A6 HF Fit. I

3500 Moo"lAl BU, B1 Fri. & 12 BU Flelon I40000 Mortorl - A2 Fri & A2 BU Flion Fi.

150O Monoral - 2 Wei O'de Dust Col.40000 Monorail - A HF Fier I

4000D Mortor#- AI & A2 HFFier "40000 Monoril - A UF4 Sec. Dust Col

45000 Monorail - A Red. BU Filer90008 Monoril. - " Redbidor BU Fier tIN00 Monrailr - "S Redlidor BU Filer I

17000 Monoril- 82 HF Filr I550011Monoril- 81 HF FIler

30000 Monoral -I1 Low Boer Condenser 130001 MonoraIl - 12" Low Boier Corenser I30001 Monorail -83 Low Boiler Cordenser e30000 Monorail - 04 Low Boier Condernser

20000 Monor" - Ash Dust Col. Blo:wer

EaEFEmEmEsE.BEEsEaEaEaE.EsE.E.I.Ea

EaE.EaE.

E.

Em

E.EaEsEsE.

EaIEmEe

EaE.E.

E.

E.E.E.EmE.

E&Es

B.

EEE.E.EsE.E.EaE.E.EsE.E.E.E.E.E.E.E.E.ENEs

BEE.BE

E.E.E.E.E.EaE.

EaE.EsE.

B.

E.E.E.E.E.E.

Ea

E.E.E.E.

I FM-U, Fbar 8.0 6L000 BOOSI F1,11111, Fleer 69.0 $1000,0 BOOAI F.3t lm 40.0 103.0 12.8I FM-M Fler 40.0 B03. 120I FM-U, Fle 40.0 ,03.0 12.6I FM-U, Fle 40.0 503.0 123.I Fbi-U, Floie 500 34.0 0CI FM-iS Flee 618.0 34.0 0,0I FM-U Fleer 13O80 3.340,0 24 0I FM-U,1 Fle 1200 3,340.0 5140I FMUh Flor 58.0 1,117.0 1011.0I FtM-UFloe 1110o 1.841.9 IlBsI FidfUFler 64.0 4.425.0 111.0I FM-eFh Ile MIA 4.426.0 111.01 F-U Flee 174.0 2300.0 13.3I FM-Bt Flee 1740 2300.0 1331 FM-U Fleer 6A 4972.0 9B4

-FM-,Flear 6810 14,4010.0 3.1118111 FM4 Fbe 64110 4.426.0 1110I FMi-fil Floe 63.0 32560.0 3B2I F-U ,FI 68A0 2` I.3 6723

SFM-U, Fle "A0 2.200.0 10o0I FM-U Floe 54.0 2.20.0 100.0I FM- Fleow 68l0 361.0 80I FM-U, Floee 680 110.0 186.0I FM-M Fler 5840 5486 14AI FM-3 Fler 64.0 141A 3.71 FMU,4h FI 64A0 141 4 3.7I FM-0l Few 58.0 141A 3,7I FM-UFlera 80 141A 3.7I FM-UFle 580 2`913 672.S FM-U Flee 102.0 50.0 00I FIM., Fli 102A0 O.0 00I FM-U, Fli 102A0 600 00t FM-U, Fleo 102.0 60.0 0.I F14% File 1020 60.0 0aI FM-ft Flee 102A0 0.0 00I FM-Ue, F 102-0 50.0 0SI M- Flee 102.0 50.0 00I FM-U, Fleer 1270 2.0 021 F164 Fier 68.0 3.170.0 us0I FM-M Flie 5 1.170Z0 686I FM-U, Flee 50 3,170.0 660I FM-U, Fler MI0 1462.0 290I FM-Ut Fle 5.0 1452.0 290I FM-Uh Fle6r80 1.482.0 2906

F FMM-UFlor 1110 1.8410 BS•I FM-*fot 1140 1,6362 13.3I FM-U Flm 11B.0 1526.2 13.3I FM•-•UI 118.0 1.6362 13.3I FM-U, Flier 680 2,200.0 36010

-FM-e Ie. 111.0 1.8416 lBSI FM-BO F'ke 680 1,402.0 295I FM-U, Flie 58.0 1,4820 29.0I FM-l Flier 5.0 1.492.0 2901 FM-M Flee 5.80 1,492.0 290$I FM-U, Flee 42.0 3010 903I FM-UFl-e 580 58 I

I N1", F- . 90.0 CAt FM-t Flier DD 0B0.0 OI FM-4U Fie 9BOO 90.0 0.

I FM-U, Flee BOO OA 0.8I FM-% Flee, .0 11.OO 0*t FM-U, Fler B.O 80.0 00I FM-U, Flie BOO 00.0 0Ot Fbim- Flie BGO 90,0 0CI FMU, Fli 9r BO B00 0AI FM-U Fleer B0.0 BO.0 06

I FM-, Flee BOO 90.0 00I FM-U, Fie B0 90.0 CAI FM-f Floer 91.0 90.0 0.8I FM-ft Fle B0 BOO. 0•I FM-U, Fleer B10 00.0 0.8I FM-U Flee BOO0 90.0 0.8

I FM-OeFlow 163.0 237.6 I.eI FWM-B Flee 146.0 8486 401 FM-lU Flee. 1450 617 3A61 FM-ft Fil 124.0 517. 42t FM-U, Fle 145-0 4744 3.3I FM-U File 124.0 40.O 3.7I FM- Fl-e 1240 345.0 2.8I FM-S Flooe 146.0 34U0 2.4I FM-fh Fle 124-0 m 2 70I F10, Fle-r 1240 S750 4AI FM-Uh File 12410 67610 4AI FM-U, Fle 146J0 218 1 AI FM-UM FI 10320 213.1 IAI FWMU Fier 146A 3234 2.21 FM-U, Fle 146-0 2234 2.2I FM-U, Fler 146.0 323A 2-2I FM-ft Floo 1460 301.6 2.1I FM-8t Flw 1460 301 A 2.1I FMU, Fleer 146,0 3016 2.1I FM Fie 1460 2014 2.7I FM-U, Flee 141501 172S6 1.2

34.8•034,00

60450,4504

60436

&333. &M91338

1.43

•.43o2.3142Z314

6786010

6,434

3.26433,193

6.8295,920

6519.290

1164216216216216

33,t932219

61SI

6161

6161SI61

263.2773,2773.277

1,7111,7111,7111,8431,6431,6431.543

20,3001,8431.7111.7111,7111,711

386347078707878707079717879707o7979

7.70

245623522621479469347348me6706702612143171

318315305306305306174

500 100%BOO 100%

13 100%13 100t%13 100%13 100%

11 I00%1 100%

24 1001%24 100%

109 1001%17 100%

111 100%111 100%

13 100%13 100%

MG6 100%0 100%

111 100%38 400%

672 t00%101 100%101 100%

to too%&160 100%18 100%4 100%4 100%4 100%4 100%

672 100%1 100%1 100%1 100%I 100%1 100%1 100%1 100%1 100%I 100%07 100%

67 100%67 100%67 100%30 100%30 100%30 100%17 100%13 100%

13 100%360 100%

17 100%30 100%30 100%30 100130 100%B 100%1 100%1 100%I 100%

1 100%

1 100%I 100%

1 100%1 100%

I 100%1 100%1 100%1 100%1 100%I 100%1 100%

2 100%6 100%4 100%4 100%

2 100%

4 100%3 100%2 100"A7 100%6 100%6 100%2 00%I to0%2 100%2 100%2 1001%2 100%2 too%2 100%2 100%1 100%

34,300 N0o34,800 O00

504 13604 13604 13604 1335 I36 I

S,:334 243,338 246,284 1081,843 170,4348 Ill

6,438 I12Z314 132.314 13

67.86l MG0 0

6,43 111I3.264 38

33,19• 1726.982 1016.,02 101

501 105,200 10O

964 IS216 4216 4216 4216 4

33,193 67251 161 16151 161 151 161 161 1

26 03,277 673.277 673,277 571.711 301,711 301711 301,843 171,643 131.543 131,543 13

20,300 3601,43 171.711 301.711 301,711 301,711 30380 9

34 178 I78 178 I7. I7B ¶78 17078 I78 17e 1

78 178 . 179 I

78 I78 1

245 2563

622 4621 4479 3458 4347 2348 2a8 7570 6670 5201 2214

319 2319319 2306 2306 235 2305 2174 1

C sly D ms s0.i W a 7 J.oPwP•, 7 o8 0 -J •00, 04:46 PM

Page 88: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

Appendix A-13WSCELLANEOUS rrMM VOLUME ESTIMATESHonertul Metropois FacUlty

NUMBER MATERIAL PERCENT ENVIRO ENVIRODESCRIPTION LOC OF OF BULK UNIT UNIT TOTAL TOTAL DIRECT DISPOSAL DISPOSAL

CODE UNITS UNITS CONSTRUCT. DENSITY W0EIGHT VOLUME WEIGH4 VOLUME BURY WEIGHT VOLLMEMA ) ) 31m Wel%) Ob) f93)

2000O Monorai. Ash Dust Col Blower Motor I IE I PM4-8 Floor1000O Monoral I Ea I FM l Flow10000l Monorai I Ea I FOrM- FIo

Monorail F-496 & F-497 Fluo01efor Flter Es I FM-U, PlwMonoral - F-463 & F-494 Forjotor Flter I Ed I FM-WG&P

SOlencer - Ash Vo¢ Ct Eah. I Es I FM01t FloorA UF4 D.C. Exhisuster I E. I PUU Floor

Wet Odde Dust Col Slower I E I FM-P4 PiewUF4 BU D.C. BlOhw I E. Fm4P 1 Fbs

"A* Reduclon Ex Coolng Blower I E I FMUM FleAsh Vac. CL Ex.mmuen I Ea I F1M-U Flee

Dry Oxide D.C. Bwr I -. I FM-U, FloorA HF Pri. Je Scnlber-Emst I Ea I P'M41-U .Fl

Ash D.C. Eimstler E. FM-fl FP..A HF Sec. Jet Scnuber .WedI Es I 8& Fle

Draw H&V Unit 0 1 FI I FM-, FloorDmvo H&V Ul2 1 Es I FM-U FlwDraw H&V UnI414 I E. FI-eI Floor

Draw Weol~d Drall Fern I E. I FM-U, Floe,Drawo Iduced Draft Fan i E. I FM-, FloorDraw kiduoed Draft Fen I E. FIaM-t Flow

Root E-os Blower No. I Es I FM-m FnRoof E.iavouit Blow Hoist Wei I Es I FM-U. Floe,

Trans Verd LSt No 317-1 E. 1 FM-U, FlowTnn. Vent U No 222-1 1 Ea I FM-ft 1oM

Ej~sual Fen - Sow I E. I FM-U, Floe,Exdheu Fa- Wo Es I FM-ll Fl.oExhaust Fe-)m I Es I FM4-U Fn_

Faen- Man Cooler I Es I FM-U, FIerVeto Fem I Es I FO-UFlow

" Redutor Ext Gas Coo• lw I Ea I FM-el P:oorDurilteg Waer Cooler I Es I FM-U, Floe

Scrnuber. A Green SoI Dust Coleclor I E I FIMost FP-Scruber, B Green Sal Dust Collect• I Es I FM-U, P

SW-22 Swtcboowd - See Dwg MTW-A0029 I E. I FM-U, loSW`-23 Switchoard - Sea Dwg MTW-A030 I Es I FM-rN, Pn

UF4 Hopper I E. I FU.Uh FI-pt Decay Hopper I E. I FMW-r, Fle

Air Blow Back Sege Te* I Es I FM-rFlo'A* Redjdoo Feed Hopper I Es I FM-U, Floe*B Reductor Feed Hopper I Es I FM-rn, F•

Vb&br-O, No2 Dry Ox Dust Coil HppIF412) I E. I FM-rn FiP-Vilbrtor - On'A*Sac UF4 DOus Cog I Es I PM-r, Foe

Vitor - On*B*Sec UF4 Dust Col(F450) I Es I FMU, Floe,Vbrtor - OnrA" Red Exl Ges CooiesE625) I Es I FM-h FIPV'brJaor.- On'Bl•ed ExI Gas Cooler(E632) I Ea I FM-ft Floe

VIbrator- On (F-450) Es FP1.-b FloeRotay VFVo--A'UF4 Sec D.C. Disch Es FM-rnhJp4ss

Rotar yVleve-9 UF4 Sec D.C. Disch I Ea I FM-U, FleCounlo,*ued Sol of Sespin Plear Railroad Trawis 4 f 3.5680 Sol

Conrtssled Soil M Samrping Plort North Feame 4 cf 132 SaoCorntarmsleod Debis at Serming Plant Ralkoad Tradc 4 O 6 .1

BEIMFF buildig LLRW Trash In drums 2 d- ,250 DAWMatereal on Weale Pad / Other 3 ds B DAW

SMIFF bildrVg LLRW Trash in B-25 Boxes 2 B-25 b- 129 DAWBMfFF builing LLRW Trai, In Blue Boxes 2 ble bex 20 DAW

Scrap Metal an Metals Pod 3 f 96,1602 MesHew Scrap Me•tl I oMa Pod 3 cf 1,408 M.

I"xI"7x cubes for disposal on Mestas Pad 3 d 432 M.tw.8,',off - In CnO, Bihig & 2 &M 217 Sludge

Otf as Mateoral in Crusher Bldlng 2 2 d- lB 16 s",gVEqipmert Sodim Rernovalllon Ew•i1o Bldg I er l-o 3,600 .SI ResIX 1stEquppwr Sodurt Renoveaon Excharge Bldg I luvre lo• 3,20 ,S4 R-inX Mar

Eqpmert KOH Muds Buidng I n lost ,Z34 KOH MkEql•pfft Uranium Recovery Buifn I eq- ls 4.680 U Rees. 1.Eqiprwt UrvaNIau Recovery B-ildnig I wo les 1.100 U Re.w. Me"Eq~Lpes FM Buhing SoAhest pad I qu- f.st 3,980 FM-Bts..,nEquLmdpn FM Budig Southwest pad I -q- les 3.584 F-B- -e- A

Epuipmest Sa~rsple Peari I eq- lost 4,484 FM&-6.4,.iEquipment Pond Muds Fite8r Calciner Bldg 2 .1,- fes 1,126 FM- Bs• oel

EWlppenet Cyinder wash BRil 2 squlre w04 FM-B&B-oEq~ilsfe, Drop,, clastl Bn.Ang 2 sq-a lost 6,340 FWR-lssses

FM Building Denoklon Debrs I ,Ak les 10o.0o43 DebrisFM Building Dermoilon Concrete Rumbble I .6k les 61048 s.,st 5NH Removal BL~dkV Doenloon Debris I ob flet 13.796 0DebAU Recovery Bul• n Demo4flo, on Debris 1 .. lest 14,141 0..

KOH Muds BUlg Demornotion Debns I cu lest 1,1923 .1%Savpls Ped BUIsg Dernosilon Deets I ubk lest 14,231 0.d1

C._aok BU11ng Dernolltion Debris 2 oe es g0 D.6,1.FM Pads Desnollion Conoreate Rubble I lost Z3%8 s• , l n,.e

EBca•slod Pipe 4 bk 1- 1.058 SstRoofn Over Lawssry Area 5 sMe lest 600 A%*s.hu-eel

146.0 172.- 12127.0 437.6 34127.0 625. 4.1145.0 61706 3.A146.0 617.6 3.076.0 417.2 6.6680 37S.0 75.058.0 12a.7 65.080.0 300.0 6008.0 60.0 110

6180 4000 60.0680 617A 137.668011) 1.1 1.86.0 120.0 240680 91.1 10A680. 2000 I180680 200.0 18868.0 200.0 10.06•8 2000 10.80610 200.0 198.068• 2000 108.068.0 "0.0 188068.0 600c) In8680. 47&.3 95.1680 1000 160.0•80 230•0 32.068.0 230A 32.068,0 230A 32.0580 100.0 1.058.0 1000. 1.940.0 3000 7,513A1 3.0 6.068.0 "87.7 13.1580. 487.7 13.140A0 600 16.040.0 8000 15I680 91.600 1.92S50S80 21.321 A 4.20426.80 337.8 IBAM8I [email protected] 25O.068.0 2.650.0 2SO.0

123.0 0.0 0.1122.0 90A 0.1123.0 9.0 0.1123.0 90. 0.1123.0 9ao 0.1123.0 90 0.168.0 7.7 12S8.0 17.7 12

100.0 1000 1.0100.0 100.0 1.040.0 40-0 1.0400. 3000 7040A 3000 7.640.0 3ý,2.0 86040.0 2.160A. 64.

100.0 1000 1.0100.0 100.0 1.0100.0 100-0 1.090.0 671.0 7.5

0.0 6760 7.663.763.783.763.763.763.763.783.763.763.763.702.070062.002.062,0620S2.070.042.3

100.0

174 I 100%432 3 100%621 4 100%032 4 100%62 4 100%41l 0 100%

4,350 76 100%3.n22 U 100%3,480 88 100%1044 1I 100%4.640 s 100%7.078 138 100%

63 2 100%13•82 24 100%

63 2 1 00%11,404 18 100%11,484 1o 100%11.484 18 100%11,484 1911 100%11,484 t18 100%11.484 118 100%11.464 196 100%11.484 1 8 100%

.,516 96 tOO%9,28 160 100%1,86Il 32 100%lass 32 1O0%1,58 32 100%

110 2 100%110 2 100%

300 6 100%63 6 90%

780 13 1 00%A760 13 100%860 17 100%

900 I6 100%0 0 100%0 0 100%

487 I 100%14,600 260 100%14.500 250 100%

12 0 100%12 0 100%12 0 100%12 0 100%12 0 100%12 0 100%70 1 100%70 1 100%

356.000 3.680 tO0%13,200 132 100%3,520 88 100%

97S.000 16.076 100%Z,400 60 100%

464.686 11386 100%64000Q 1,363 100%

9860.200 98,602 33%145,900 1,468 33%43,205 432 33%

146,476 1,62t 100%10.125 113 100%

310,490 4,070 00%20S.471 3.229 90%196.199 3,066 90%371.006 6.941 90%

112680 1.408 9W%317.013 4,180 90%290.66 4,666 0%366,9M 6,749 00%

01,720 1,441 90%206547 648 60%

5,473.640 66940 60%0.r70248 170.371 100%

720.760 9.677 100%717.382 206,10 100%7 1.t32 20,961 100oA

EZ010 1,183 100%740.012 21,046 100%

51,020 861 100%1568018 2.660 100%

88.770 1,656 100%.0000 600 100%

174432621522622419

4,3503,11n

3.4801,0844,8407.976

9311.41111,484

11,48411.40411.48411,48411,48411.4646.169.260

1.864I,$"•1.6058

110110

3000

760760

0

0487

14,60014,00

121212

1212127070

356,00013.2003,520

876,000Z,400

464,6W54,600

3.187.,•m48.11414.256

146,47510.126

279.441104.,24175,670334,62080,721

25.312

07.14210,274

44

4

1Be

so

18so

158

102

242

138

Igo

1e1181go1go18o118

10

to10

32

3232

22

1313171500

14z

622002000

0

00

3,680

12

1,

3'460

16,87460

11,3661,383

31,879481143

1134,390

3,7606.2071,2684,4824.109Z.8741,389

3231

21.770 3,4205.670,289 170,371

725,760 0.677717,3'2 20,610736,332 20,96662,010 1,193

740.012 21,04061,025 g81

65,770 1.6"450,000 600

TOTALS Z5.770,906 471,889 100% 18,043,483 394,342

C'Mp D s dnero se~le.OPe P"* 0 of 0 06-Jn-00. 04-48 P

Page 89: Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, … · 2019-12-18 · opý 10. Site Reclamation Cost Estimate for Plant Located in Metropolis, Illinois Revision 0

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX A- 14 Soil Waste Volume

A-14 Revision 0