school district no. 42 considering school closure mount crescent elementary school

24
School District No. 42 Considering School Closure Mount Crescent Elementary School October 8, 2009

Upload: sereno

Post on 04-Feb-2016

56 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

School District No. 42 Considering School Closure Mount Crescent Elementary School October 8, 2009. School District No. 42 Considering School Closure October, 2009. Introductions. School District No. 42 Considering School Closure October, 2009. Background. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: School District No. 42  Considering School Closure Mount Crescent Elementary School

School District No. 42

Considering School Closure

Mount Crescent Elementary SchoolOctober 8, 2009

Page 2: School District No. 42  Considering School Closure Mount Crescent Elementary School

School District No. 42

Considering School ClosureOctober, 2009

Introductions

Page 3: School District No. 42  Considering School Closure Mount Crescent Elementary School

School District No. 42

Considering School ClosureOctober, 2009

Background 2006-07 - Cornerstone Report recommends

school closures

Fall, 2007 - Three schools considered for school closure. Decision made to not close schools at that time

Spring, 2009 - Riverside and Mount Crescent considered for closure. First meetings with parents.

Fall, 2009 - Consultation process continues

Page 4: School District No. 42  Considering School Closure Mount Crescent Elementary School

School District No. 42

Considering School ClosureOctober, 2009

Purpose and Process We will present the district staff perspective and

share the many pieces that go into consideration for school closure

School closure is never tied to just one thing; many factors need to be considered together

We will give you all the information we have and try to bring an understanding of why we are here

At the end of the presentation there will be an opportunity to provide further input and ask questions that were not addressed in the presentation

Page 5: School District No. 42  Considering School Closure Mount Crescent Elementary School

School District No. 42

Considering School ClosureOctober, 2009

What has changed since Spring 2009

Full-day kindergarten announced

Opening of new bridges

Enrolment continues to decline

Increased financial pressure on all school districts

Page 6: School District No. 42  Considering School Closure Mount Crescent Elementary School

School District No. 42

Considering School ClosureOctober, 2009

Major issues raised in Spring 2009

Senior staff have taken all questions asked in the spring and incorporated them into the major categories that form the basis of this presentation:

1. Enrolment numbers

2. Facilities

3. Financial impact

4. Educational opportunities

5. Considering amalgamation

Page 7: School District No. 42  Considering School Closure Mount Crescent Elementary School

School District No. 42

Considering School ClosureOctober, 2009

1. District/School enrolment Long range projections show a continuing

downward trend

Large numbers of Grade 12 students are not being replaced by incoming Kindergarten students

Declining school enrolment*

Capacity compared to utilization across the district

*As shown in the annual 1701 report which is submitted to the Ministry of Education on September 30 each year.

Page 8: School District No. 42  Considering School Closure Mount Crescent Elementary School

School District No. 42

Considering School ClosureOctober, 2009

District enrolmentProjection Report for Public School Headcount Enrolments 2008/09

Ministry of Education enrolment projections – all grades

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

14,349 14,121 13,918 13,770 13,679 13,658 13,682 13,763 13,856 14,021

Ministry of Education enrolment projections – elementary

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

7,930 7,851 7,833 7,822 7,900 8,027 8,115 8,197 8,338 8,487

Page 9: School District No. 42  Considering School Closure Mount Crescent Elementary School

2009 District enrolment K-12 (Sept. 30/09)

K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1550 1551

1500 1492

1450 1428

1400

1350

1300

1250 1221 1223

1200

1150

1100 1060 1061

1050

1000 981 969 990 958 977 1002

950

900

981 969 990 958 977 1002 1060 1061 1221 1223 1428 1492 1551

Page 10: School District No. 42  Considering School Closure Mount Crescent Elementary School

Ministry of Education enrolment projections

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

172 169 165 162 164 169 170 178 177 179 175 178

Enrolment by year

2005-2006 222

2006-2007 209

2007-2008 212

2008-2009 199

2009-2010 166

Mount Crescent enrolment numbers

2009 Enrolment by grade

K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Total

17 15 19 17 20 23 27 28 166

Page 11: School District No. 42  Considering School Closure Mount Crescent Elementary School

Capacity 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 %

Highland Park 340 366 345 326 305 90%

Pitt Meadows 471 495 511 532 563 120%

Davie Jones 340 254 252 272 288 85%

Edith McDermott 387 349 353 361 344 89%

Total 1538 1500 98%

Difference between Capacity and utilization +38

Analyzing Capacity and Utilization: West

Page 12: School District No. 42  Considering School Closure Mount Crescent Elementary School

Capacity 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 %

Albion 457 519 530 577 586 128%

Alexander Rob. 518 573 575 545 555 107%

Blue Mountain 317 202 171 170 159 50%

Kanaka Creek 573 584 566 553 578 100%

Webster’s Corner 270 135 122 115 130 48%

Whonnock 270 228 212 237 230 85%

Total 2405 2238 93%

Difference between capacity and utilization +167

Analyzing Capacity and Utilization: East

Page 13: School District No. 42  Considering School Closure Mount Crescent Elementary School

Capacity 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 %

Fairview 495 390 366 319 283 57%

Riverside 471 352 300 201 99 21%

Hammond 518 362 371 401 444 86%

Maple Ridge 518 406 393 428 426 82%

Laity View 696 565 570 581 600 86%

Glenwood 410 192 184 171 168 41%

Alouette 495 404 382 381 376 76%

Mount Crescent 401 209 212 199 166 41%

Eric Langton 471 338 312 332 350 74%

Harry Hooge 471 387 379 360 354 75%

Yennadon 602 456 469 505 536 89%

Golden Ears 564 495 491 463 455 81%

Total 6112 4257 70%

Difference between capacity and utilization +1855

Analyzing Capacity and Utilization: Centre

Page 14: School District No. 42  Considering School Closure Mount Crescent Elementary School

Capacity 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 %

Glenwood 410 192 184 171 168 41%

Alouette 495 404 382 381 376 76%

Mount Crescent 401 209 212 199 166 41%

Eric Langton 471 338 312 332 350 74%

Total 1777 1060 60%

Difference between capacity and utilization +717

Analyzing Capacity and Utilization: Centre

Page 15: School District No. 42  Considering School Closure Mount Crescent Elementary School
Page 16: School District No. 42  Considering School Closure Mount Crescent Elementary School

2. Facilities

Age and expected lifespan

Construction quality

School District No. 42

Considering School ClosureOctober, 2009

Page 17: School District No. 42  Considering School Closure Mount Crescent Elementary School

3. Financial ImplicationsEstimated year by year savings: $380,000

Principal salary and benefits

Clerical salary and benefits (full-time)

Custodial salary and benefits

Noon hour supervisors

Instructional supplies

Heat and light

Minor maintenance

School District No. 42

Considering School ClosureOctober, 2009

Page 18: School District No. 42  Considering School Closure Mount Crescent Elementary School

4.Educational OpportunitiesSome things we have heard from people about

the benefits of small schools:

Fewer classes at each grade level

Continuity with same teacher year to year

Less students at each grade level and in school

Access to communal space – gym, library

Cohesiveness of staff and parents

School District No. 42

Considering School ClosureOctober, 2009

Page 19: School District No. 42  Considering School Closure Mount Crescent Elementary School

4.Educational OpportunitiesBut what happens when they get really small…

Fewer classes at each grade level

Small peer groups

Less staff/parents to “spread out” tasks

Less time in the building by itinerant staff

Limited resources

Increased costs

School District No. 42

Considering School ClosureOctober, 2009

Page 20: School District No. 42  Considering School Closure Mount Crescent Elementary School

5. Considering AmalgamationBringing together two learning communities

into one facility

Why consider amalgamation?

Is it an option?

If yes, why Glenwood?

School District No. 42

Considering School ClosureOctober, 2009

Page 21: School District No. 42  Considering School Closure Mount Crescent Elementary School

Next StepsReflect on tonight’s proceedings

Review all input received

Provide a recommendation to the Board on December 9, 2009

School District No. 42

Considering School ClosureOctober, 2009

Page 22: School District No. 42  Considering School Closure Mount Crescent Elementary School

Future considerations if a decision is made to close a

school

Development of a transition plan for an orderly and safe accommodation/placement of students

Consideration of secondary uses

School District No. 42

Considering School ClosureOctober, 2009

Page 23: School District No. 42  Considering School Closure Mount Crescent Elementary School

School District No. 42

Considering School ClosureOctober, 2009

Please provide further input and ask questions that you feel have not been addressed in the

presentation

Page 24: School District No. 42  Considering School Closure Mount Crescent Elementary School

School District No. 42

Considering School ClosureOctober, 2009

Thank you