risk assessment & loss prevention of lng carriers in ...€¦ · 23/11/2000 · of lng carriers...
TRANSCRIPT
Risk Assessment & Loss Prevention of LNG Carriers in Operation, Under Construction and ConversionK.S. WangThe Principal Surveyor for JapanBMT Marine & Offshore Surveys Ltd.(Incorporating The Salvage Association)Kobe Office, JapanE-mail: [email protected]: +81 (0)78 331 7879Mobile: +81 (0)90 3086 1229www.bmtmarinerisk.com
• Founded in 1856 by London Insurers & others
• Royal Charter in 1867 – A Not for Profit Association
• Motto “Quaerite Vera” – meaning “Seek the Truth”
Founded 1856“The Association for the Protection of Commercial Interests as
respects Wrecked and Damaged Property”
• Known as The Salvage Association
• Expanded to 100 surveyors with 35 offices worldwide
• Our previous owner: Underwriters at Lloyds
• Affected by downturn in London Market in 1990’s
• Corporated into British Maritime Technology Group. (BMT Group) in 2001
• Renamed to BMT Marine & Offshore Surveys Ltd., in April 2007
Our worldwide network (35 Locations)
Cape TownCape TownSantiagoSantiagoDurbanDurban
SingaporeSingapore
Hong KongHong Kong
KobeKobe
BusanBusan
Abu DhabiAbu Dhabi
OaklandOaklandHoustonHouston
New OrleansNew Orleans MiamiMiami
BalboaBalboa
HalifaxHalifaxMontrealMontrealVancouverVancouver
SeattleSeattleRotterdamRotterdamHamburgHamburg
MarylandMaryland PiraeusPiraeus
AntwerpAntwerp
KandlaKandla
MumbaiMumbai VisagVisag
Vina del MarVina del Mar SantosSantos
New YorkNew York
KarachiKarachiDubaiDubai
VarnaVarnaLondonLondon
MaltaMaltaAlicanteAlicante
LisbonLisbon
Visit our web site www.bmtmarinerisk.comContact our regional officesAmericas at New York: [email protected] at London: [email protected] Pacific at Singapore: [email protected] Region at Dubai: [email protected]
JamnagarJamnagar
• Collision• Grounding• Machinery breakdown• Natural disasters• Fire• Explosions• War risks• Water ingress• Piracy• Terrorism
We Survey the Prevailing Risks in the Maritime industry
Most Common Risks
• Extensive ship wreckage • Hull damage (30 %)• Machinery damage(40 %)• Damage to cargo (30 %)• Loss of human life
Industries and Power Station
Domestic Gas
LNG FPSO
LNG FSRU
Processing, Liquefaction & Storage atLNG Production Terminal
LNG Receiving terminal
Distribution pipelines
LNG tankers
Gas production
Regasification
LNG Exporting Countries (LNG Loading Terminals)
• LNG export from countries with natural gas reserves.
• More natural gas reserves are found in production/construction in Russia, Iran, and other countries.
• LNG export is faster and more flexible than pipeline gas.
(Billion of m3)
QATAR
A very rough estimates
LNG Importing Countries CHINA AND INDIA • The major LNG importing
countries are in Asia.
• Europe and USA are increasing the import of LNG.
• The Air Quality of Japan has improved since use of LNG for Power Generator and Heavy Industries
• China will be one of the major importers of LNG
• Singapore is next on line(Billion of m3)A very rough estimates
Type of LNG Carriers
Membrane type of LNG Carrier (GTT Mark III, NO 96 and CSI)
Sizes:-
Standard: 125-150,000m3
Q-Flex: 210-217,000m3
Q-Max: 250,000m3
Spherical type of LNG Carrier
Sizes:- 125-145,000m3
• No. of Crew: About 30 per Ship
• Life Span: About 40 + years
• Construction period: About 2 ½
Spherical Type
Moss
Membrane Type
GTTTypeSPB
• Invar steel or stainless steel
• Types: NO 96, Mark III and CSI
• Aluminum Alloy• Aluminum Alloy
• Only two ships in operations
LNG FSRU (In Operation and Under Conversion/Construction)
• No. of Crew on board: About 30• Life Span: About 40 years• Conversion from existing LNG Carriers (1 ship under conversion and 1 ship under planning) • New construction of LNG FSRU
Spherical Type of LNG Carrier
• Almost 40% the LNG carriers in the world are of the Spherical type.
• 80% of LNG carriers coming to Japan are of the Spherical type.
Spherical Type of LNG Carriers
• Aluminum Alloy Spherical tank.
• 40m in diameter.
• “Self Supporting”
• 40% of the world’s LNG carriers are of this type.
MEMBRANE Type of LNG Carrier
• Primary membrane holds cargo.
• Secondary membrane prevents leakage.
• Primary & secondary insulation to maintain cargo temperature at –161 C
• Ship’s hull to support tank.
• 80% of the world’s LNG carriers under construction are of membrane type.
• Almost 60% of the LNG Carriers in the World are this Type.
NO.96 Membrane System
• Two membranes made of 36% nickel-steel (invar) 0.7 mm to 1.5 mm thick.
• Two layers of insulation boxes made of plywood filled with expanded perlite.
• Cargo tank is supported by inner hull of the ship.
MARK III Membrane System
Polyurethane Insulation Panel, this sections are to be prefabricated in the Workshop
Inner Hull Plate
Primary Barrier of Corrugated Stainless-steel of about 1.2-1.5 m/m thickness to be installed onboard
Secondary Barrier of “Triplex” Membrane
Secondary barrier of “Triplex” Membrane “Triplex” is made of glass cloth/aluminum foil/glass cloth bonded by glue.
These sections are to be installed onboard
CS1 Membrane System
• New Design (Two ships in operation)
• Combination of Mark III & No. 96.
– Nickel-steel (invar) (0.7 to 1.5 m/m) primary membrane.
– Glass cloth/Aluminum foil/Glass cloth Aluminum/glass“Triplex” secondary membrane.
– Polyurethane insulationpanel
Current Shipyards Building LNG Carriers• Korea
– Daewoo (GTT and Moss)
– Hyundai Heavy Industries (GTT and Moss)
– Samsung Heavy Industries (GTT and Moss)
– Hanjin Heavy Industries (GTT and Moss)
– STX Shipbuilding (GTT/Moss)
– 80% of world’s LNG carriers are under construction in Korea.
• France– Aker Shipyard (Chantier's de
L’Atlantique Shipyard)- GTT
• Spain– Puerto Real Shipyard - GTT
• China– Hudong Zhonghua Shipyard (GTT).
One ship delivered on 3/04/08 and Four ships under construction
• Japan– Kawasaki Shipbuilding (Moss)
– Koyo Shipyard, Imabari (GTT)
– Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (Moss/ GTT)
– Mitsui Engineering (Moss/GTT)
– Universal Shipbuilding (GTT)
– Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries (SPB)- two ships were built
LNG Ship Repair Yards
– Malaysia• Malaysia Shipbuilding & Engineering
– European Yards.• Sobrena-France.• Izar Carenas-Spain.• Blohm & Voss-Hamburg.• CMR-Italy.• San Giorgio del Porto-Italy.• Lisnave-Portugal.
– Middle East.• Dubai Dry-docks.
– Japan• Mitsubishi Heavy Industries• Kawasaki Heavy Industries• Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries• Universal Shipyards• Mitsui Engineering and Shipbuilding
– Singapore• Sembawang Group of Shipyards• Keppel Group of Shipyards
The current boom of shipbuilding has also brought forth an expansion of ship repair yards mainly under home port or home doctor concept.
• Special Trainings and licensing are required.
Risks of LNG CarrierAccidents during sea voyage:
– Grounding – Navigation error– Striking a fixed object or a wreck – Navigation error– Collision (with vessel or object) – Navigation error– Unloading/Loading
• Sudden pull-away and damage of loading/discharging arms and human injury
• Cracking of ship steel hull due to spill of LNG (super cold shock of -161℃)
– Terrorism – Missile attack, boat based explosive and hijacking.– Cargo machinery and cargo containment failures– Natural risks – Lightning, typhoon, hurricanes, and tsunami.– Other hull/machinery accidents, such as fire in engine room on bridge and in
accommodation, boilers, steam turbines, main reduction gears, diesel engine damages, and hull structural failures
Note: Apart from the above risk we must be aware of the high costs (millions of $) and long repair period (months) arising from ordinary damage on LNG Carrier.
Risks of LNG CarrierMajor and ・Minor Casualties on LNG Carriers experienced by the speaker over the last 30 years.
1979 LNG “X” (Moss) grounding in Japan – 2,000 tons of steel, 4 months of repair
– 1979 LNG “X” (Membrane) water ballast tank leak to insulation space of a cargo tank – ½ year of repair
– 1979 LNG “X” (Membrane) over pressure of insulation spaces causing building of membrane – 9 months of repair
– 1980 LNG “X” (Membrane) grounding in Gibraltar – 2,500 tons of steel and deformation of cargo tanks: 1 ½ years of repair and ship-ship transfer of LNG
– 1989 LNG “X” (Membrane) broke away from LNG Terminal due to very strong gale damaging to No. 1 cargo tank, deck deformation and loading arms – 10 months of repair
2004 LNG “X” (Membrane) grounding in Korea – 200 tons of steel, 8 months of repair
2005 LNG “X” (Membrane) sloshing damage in a LNG tank due to heavy weather, and with partially loaded LNG tank – 6 months of repair
– 2006 LNG ”X” (Membrane) sloshing damage during ballast voyage with minimum LNG, 4 months repair
- 2005/2006/2007 LNG (Membrane) “X”, “X”, “X”, “X”, and …… due to cargo containment failures (leak) in secondary barrier – 6 to 2 months of locating the leak and repairs
• Main Boiler damage• Main Reduction Gear damage• Main Turbine damage• Main Propeller shaft damage – Resulted in ship to ship transfer of LNG• Cargo Machinery damage (Cargo Pumps and etc.)• Cargo Pipe damages – movement of vessel at LNG terminal due to natural risks and machinery failures• Hull Structure Failures
A minor crack (less than 1 meter) due to grounding on the steel bulkhead in a cofferdam next to a cargo tank caused sea water ingress to the cargo tank
Sloshing Phenomena of a Partially Filled Cargo Tank
• Latest allowable minimum level of LNG in a membrane type of cargo tank is 10% of the height of the cargo tank instead of 10 % of the length of the cargo tank
Secondary barrier failure on the operating of GTT Mark III Cargo Tank (N2 leak detected during operations)
Separation due to failure of “Glue”applied on the onboard installed “Triplex”
“Triplex”Membrane-made of (glass cloth/ Aluminum foil/ glass cloth) as secondary barrier
Risks and Loss Prevention during Construction
• 1980 – Three LNG carriers in a shipyard – Total Constructive Loss. Due to cargo tank insulation failure.
• 2005 – One LNG Ship in a Shipyard – Insulation system failure. Long delays in delivery.
• 2005 – Fire in cargo tank. Due to welding of reinforcement on Pump column.
• Bulging of primary and secondary barriers during tests.
• 2005/2006/2007 – Failures of cargo containment system of LNG carriers in operations due to defects during construction.
• Our Recommendation: JH 143 Shipyard Risk Assessment and Loss Prevention Survey by BMT Surveys
Delivery delayed.
Major Construction Casualties
Major Casualties in LNG both at Loading and Receiving Terminals
Four Major accidents over 60 years of LNG usage
• Cleveland, Ohio-1944.
– Shortage of stainless steel leading to poor quality tanks after WWII.
– 128 fatalities, damage to facilities
• Staten Island, New York-1973.
– Construction accident.
– 37 fatalities, damage to facilities
• Cove point, Maryland-1979.
– LNG leakage ignited by faulty electrical circuit.
– 1 fatality, damage to facilities
• Algeria-2004.
– LNG liquefaction plant.
– Due to leaking gas drawn into a boiler fan.
– 27 fatalities, damage to facilities
There have been other accidents leading to injuries, delays in production and damages to facilities.
As Low as Reasonable Possible Risks of LNG Carriers
• Gas cloud
• Collision events
• Fire in engine room, accommodation and navigation bridge
• Release of bunker oil
• Collisions, groundings of any kind
• Man overboard, or piracy
• Contact with Quay/cargo tank releases of LNG
Measures to reduce risk and loss prevention on LNG Carriers
• Gas detection safety and firefighting equipments: Manual and automatic gas detections, foam, powder, water curtain, and sea water fire fighting systems
• Safety and Operation Internal Inspection/Audit by crew: Monthly• Safety and Operation Internal Inspection/Audit yearly by ship managers• Safety and Operational and Management Inspection/Audit and Security Screening
every 2 or 2 ½ years by External Surveyors (Class, Statutory, PSC, OCIMF, P & I Club)• Pre-employment crew screening, continuous training, up-grading of license and
selection of suitable crew• Terrorist risk prevention based on ISPS• Entry and Routine Condition Survey for P&I Clubs by BMT Surveys • JH115A general condition survey for Hull Insurers by BMT Surveys• JH2006/010 A, B,C, Engine room and office management and condition surveys for
Hull Insuers by BMT Surveys • JH143 Shipyard Risk Assessment and Loss Prevention Surveys during Construction /
Conversion of LNG Carrier by BMT Surveys• Preparation of Standard Maintenance Specification, Master Maintenance Plan and
Priced Standard Maintenance Plan by BMT Surveys• Use of Service Engineers for All the Vital Machinery and Equipments
New Risks on New Technologies
• LNG Carriers have proven experience of steam turbines propulsionsystem.
• New propulsion system is introducedDual Fuel Diesel Engine Propulsion SystemsDual Fuel Diesel Engines + Electric Motors propolusion systemReliqefication PlantRe-gasification plant
New Cargo Containment System (Mark III, CS I and so on....)
LNG FPSO
LNG FSRU
• We are going into new technologies accompanying with new risks.
Risks on Shipbuilders
• New Technologies
• More shipyards are building of LNG Carriers.
• High demand on trainned and experienced shipyard workers.
• Poching of Experienced Workers from One Shipyard to Another Shipyard
• Shortage of skill and trainned workers
• Major safety, quality and trainning issues
Risk Due To Shortage Of Experienced LNG Crew• In year 2000 the number of LNG were about 130.
• In year 2007 it increased to 250.
• In yerar 2010 the number of LNGC increse to about 300.
• 6 experieced senior officers per LNGC are required. (Master, Chief Officer, Chief Enginner, 1st Enginner, Cargo Engineer, Electrical Engineer)
2000: 1,000 Experienced senior officers
2007: 3,000 Experienced senior officers
2010: 3,600 Experienced senior officers
• In addition, due to increase in the construction of LNG Carriers, LNG FPSO, and LNG FSRU more experienced seafarers are employed as owner’s construction and operation superintendants.
• The Seaman’s Life is “Not as Fun as Before” due to 12 hours turn around at port at LNG Terminals
• There is a great shortage of experienced LNG senior officers in the marine industries.
• Trainning, licensing, security screening and better financial rewards and benefits are essential in order to attract seafarers to this industries .
LNG Receiving Terminals in the USA
More LNG Terminals and FSRU are under construction and planning in USA and the Americas
References“Trade Winds”“Fair Play”“Use of Risk Analysis for Emergency Planning of LNG Carriers” (Skramstad, E; Musaeus, S; Melbo, S-of DNV and Osprey) Nov23 2000 Gastech.“LNG Journals”“Hazardous Cargo Bulletin” March 2005.“LNG World Shipping” Dec. 2005“The Global Liquefied Natural Gas Market: Status and Outlook” -2003 Department of Energy Report, US GovernmentImages from:www.marinelog.com/ IMAGESMMIV/gaselys.jpg http://www.standards.org.sg/files/vol11no3art2.htmhttp://www.genesisenergy.co.nz/genesis/resources/news/LNG%20briefing%20to%20media.pdfhttp://www.dmhi.ct.ro/indexro.htmlhttp://www.helderline.nl/?p=/ship_details.php?id=373http://www.portcities.org.uk/london/server/show/conMediaFile.1853/The-LNG-(liquified-natural-gas)carrier-Libra.htmlEnergy Information Administrationhttp://www.eia.doe.govOil and Gas Journalhttp://www.ogj.pennnet.comGaztransport and Technigaz Naval engineering brochures
Mark III SystemNo. 96 SystemCS 1 System
Moss Systems engineering brochuresIHI-SPM Brochures
K.S. Wang -after the main engine damage survey wearing safety helmet, safety goggles, ear plug, mask, gloves, boiler suit, safety shoes and explosion proof torch lights
A Marine Engineer, a Registered professional engineer, a Member of Institute of Engineers. Ten years shipyard experience as project manager. Twenty years experience as marine superintendent and fleet manager of LNG carriers in Japan. Three year s as operations manager for an LPG terminal in China. Seven years as Principal Marine Surveyor, specialized in Condition Surveys of LNG Carriers in Japan, JH143 Shipyard Risk Assessment and Loss Prevention Surveys in Japan, China, Taiwan and Vietnam. Languages: English, Chinese, and Japanese.