restructuring and downsizing in od

26
RESTRUCTURING AND DOWNSIZING IN OD Presented By: Venkatesh.L.Nadar (07bs4787) N.Rakesh (07bs2382)

Upload: raksai15

Post on 11-Apr-2015

2.796 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Restructuring and Downsizing in OD

RESTRUCTURING AND DOWNSIZING IN OD

Presented By:Venkatesh.L.Nadar (07bs4787)N.Rakesh (07bs2382)

Page 2: Restructuring and Downsizing in OD

Contingencies Influencing Structural Design

Environment

Organization

Size

TechnologyOrganization

Goals

WorldwideOperationsStructural

Design

Page 3: Restructuring and Downsizing in OD

FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION

VP Research VP Operations VP Hum anResources

VP M arketing VP Finance

President

Page 4: Restructuring and Downsizing in OD

THE FUNCTIONAL FORM

Promotes skill specialization

Reduces duplication of scarce resources and uses resources full time

Enhances career development for specialists within large departments

Facilitates communication and performance because superiors share expertise with their subordinates

Exposes specialists to others within same specialty

• Emphasizes routine tasks; encourages short time horizons

• Fosters parochial perspectives by managers and limits capacity for top-management positions

• Multiplies interdepartmental dependencies; increases coordination and scheduling difficulties

• Obscures accountability for overall results

Advantages Disadvantages

Page 5: Restructuring and Downsizing in OD

THE DIVISIONAL ORGANIZATION

Chief FinancialOfficer

VP Research

Division M anagerAsia

VP Hum anResources

VP Operations VP Sales andM arketing

Division M anagerNorth Am erica

Division M anagerEurope

Chief ExecutiveOfficer

Page 6: Restructuring and Downsizing in OD

THE DIVISIONAL FORM

Recognizes interdepartmental interdependencies

Fosters an orientation toward overall outcomes and clients

Allows diversification and expansion of skills/training

Ensures accountability by departmental managers and promotes delegation

Heightens departmental cohesion and involvement in work

Advantages• May use skills and resource

inefficiently• Limits career advancement

by specialists • Impedes specialists’ exposure

to others within same specialties

• Puts multiple-role demands upon people and creates stress

• May promote departmental objectives as opposed to overall organizational goals

Disadvantages

Page 7: Restructuring and Downsizing in OD

THE MATRIX ORGANIZATION

VP Finance VP Hum an Resources

Program M anagerAircraft

Program M anagerNavigation System s

Program M anagerSpace System s

Senior VPProgram s

VP Research VP Engineering VP M anufacturing VP M arketing

Senior VPOperations

PresidentCEO

Page 8: Restructuring and Downsizing in OD

THE MATRIX STRUCTURE

Makes specialized, functional knowledge available to all projects

Use people flexibly Maintains consistency by

forcing communication between managers

Recognizes and provides mechanisms for dealing with legitimate, multiple sources of power

Can adapt to environmental changes

Advantages• Can be difficult to

implement• Increases role ambiguity,

stress, and anxiety • Performance is lowered

without power balancing between projects and functions

• Makes inconsistent demands and can promote conflict and short-term crisis orientation

• May reward political skills over technical skills

Disadvantages

Page 9: Restructuring and Downsizing in OD

THE PROCESS-BASED STRUCTURE

Developing New Products ProcessP rocess O w n er

C ross F u n c tion a l Team M em b ers

Acquiring and Filling Custom er Orders ProcessP rocess O w n er

C ross F u n c tion a l Team M em b ers

Supporting Custom er Usage ProcessP rocess O w n er

C ross F u n c tion a l Team M em b ers

Senior M anagem ent T eamC h a ir an d K ey S u p p ort P rocess O w n ers

Page 10: Restructuring and Downsizing in OD

CHARACTERISTICS OF PROCESS-BASED STRUCTURES· Processes drive structure · Work adds value· Teams are fundamental· Customers define performance· Teams are rewarded for performance· Teams are tightly linked to suppliers and

customers· Team members are well informed and trained

Page 11: Restructuring and Downsizing in OD

THE PROCESS-BASED FORM

Focuses resources on customer satisfaction

Improves speed and efficiency

Adapts to environmental change rapidly

Reduces boundaries between departments

Increases ability to see total work flow

Enhances employee involvement

Lowers costs dues to overhead

• Can threaten middle managers and staff specialists

• Requires changes in command-and-control mindsets

• Duplicates scarce resources• Requires new skills and

knowledge to manage lateral relationships and teams

• May take longer to make decisions in teams

• Can be ineffective if wrong processes are identified

Advantages Disadvantages

Page 12: Restructuring and Downsizing in OD

THE NETWORK ORGANIZATION

DesignerOrganizations

SupplierOrganizations

BrokerOrganization

ProducerOrganizations

DistributorOrganizations

Page 13: Restructuring and Downsizing in OD

THE NETWORK-BASED FORM

Enables highly flexible and adaptive responses

Creates a “best of the best” firm to focus resources on customer and market needs

Each organization can leverage a distinctive competency

Permits rapid global response

Can produce “synergistic” results

• Difficulty managing lateral relationships across autonomous organizations

• Difficulty motivating members to relinquish autonomy to join network

• Sustaining membership and benefits can be problematic

• May give partners access to proprietary knowledge and technology

Advantages Disadvantages

Page 14: Restructuring and Downsizing in OD

It is a set of activities undertaken on part of the management and designed to improve organizational efficiency, productivity and/or competitiveness.

DOWNSIZING

Page 15: Restructuring and Downsizing in OD

DOWNSIZING TACTICS

• Aimed at headcount reduction

Workforce Reduction

• Aimed at organizational Change

Organizational Redesign

• Aimed at cultural change

Systemic Redesign

Page 16: Restructuring and Downsizing in OD

WHY DOWNSIZE

Declining Profits Business downturn or increased pressure from competitors Mergers and acquisitions Introduction to new technologies Reduce operating costs Decrease levels of management Getting rid of employee “Deadwood”

Page 17: Restructuring and Downsizing in OD
Page 18: Restructuring and Downsizing in OD

DOWNSIZING INTERVENTIONS

Clarify the organization’s strategy Assess downsizing options and making

relevant choices Implement the changes Address the needs of survivors and those

who leave Follow through with growth plans

Page 19: Restructuring and Downsizing in OD

THE SURVIVORSReactions • Negative Attitudes and behaviors• Reduced performance capabilities• Lower organizational Productivity• Anger• Anxiety• Resentment

Page 20: Restructuring and Downsizing in OD

THE DELTA DIFFERRENCE

Page 21: Restructuring and Downsizing in OD

DELTA AIRLINES – A CASE STUDY

3rd largest US airline Industry pushed over the edge post 9/11 Major US carriers cut costs by $14B Over 70,000 or 16% of workforce was laid

off 267 aircrafts were grounded

Page 22: Restructuring and Downsizing in OD

“ ALL AIRLINES ARE ALIKE, IT’S PEOPE THAT MAKES DELTA DIFFERENT.”

- C.E.WOOLMAN

Page 23: Restructuring and Downsizing in OD

Direct dealing between employees and management

HR dept was outsourced A Core team was setup led by the CLO A war room was setup Build a workforce reduction program to manage

crisis DWP – a set of 3 programs

Enhanced early retirement Leave of absence Severance

DOWNSIZING EFFORTS AT DELTA

Page 24: Restructuring and Downsizing in OD

Employees provided with 6 voluntary programs – 1-5 yr leave programs

Added flight privileges, pension credit time and ability to bid for their jobs while on leave

Intended to keep connectivity of employees Involuntary severance program also created 98% of employee reduction created through

voluntary leave program Open to apply to other positions

Page 25: Restructuring and Downsizing in OD

CHANGE MANAGEMENT

Tools were developed to assist managers to evaluate their process, job designs and organization structures

Identify and implement changes in management with reduced staff levels

Training programs New ‘LEADER - LED’ communication

strategy HR being viewed as a support area Websites

Page 26: Restructuring and Downsizing in OD

THANK YOU