project update summary - nordgold.com project final.pdf · steam coal power plant to supply...
TRANSCRIPT
April 2015
Nordgold Investor Day
Gross Project
Oleg Pelevin, Head of Strategy
2 2
Gross – Project Background
Gross – Brief Overview Gross project location
Gross project located in Russia, southwestern Yakutia,
125 km northeast of the Ikabya station on the BAM railway
Gross is 5 km from Neryungri operating mine with access
by all-season road
The project is 100% owned by Nordgold
Gross mining license was granted in May 2013 and pilot
stage mining permit in November 2013
Feasibility study completed in February 2014
The latest R&R audit confirmed
- 4.5 Moz of gold at 0.73 g/t in P & P Reserves
- 8.6 Moz of gold at 0.67 g/t at M,I & I Resources
Open-pit mining with heap leach processing technology
Start of pilot stage operation at the end of February 2014
– processing of Gross ore on existing facilities of
Neryungri mine
Gross Ore Reserve has been approved by Russian state
authority GKZ in November 2014
Obtaining formal project construction permit from Russian
authorities expected in H2 2015
2 year construction time to reach full capacity
3 3
Gross - Major Challenges and Solutions
Gross major technical challenges to overcome…
• Large but low grade deposit for heap leach technology
only
• High seasonality of heap leaching in arctic climate, sharp
slowdown of the process at low temperatures
• Difficult hilly landscape and lack of flat space for large
leach pads
• No access to electric power grid
… and solutions suggested
Dynamic leach pad with stacking ore and removing it
to ore dump after leaching cycle. Only one flat space is
required for life of mine volume of ore processing instead
of three of similar size
Cyanide solution heating to reach high and stable
recovery and eliminate seasonality
Onsite steam coal power plant to supply low cost electric
power and heat
Power plant capacity should be minimized due to
relatively high capital costs and steaming coal supply
volumes
4 4
Feasibility Study - Main Parameters
2014 Feasibility Study main technical solutions and parameters
Open pit mining
Dynamic heap leach processing technology for low grade ore
Ore crushing and conveyor system
Cyanide solution heating to reach stable high recovery
Steam coal power plant to supply electric power and heat. Plant capacity is balanced to provide sufficient electric power for
processing facilities and heat for cyanide solutions
Main technical parameters:
• Total minable Reserve 192 Mt at 0.73 g/t gold, 140 tons or 4.5 Moz of gold
• Average annual ore throughput 12.0 Mtpa
• Average stripping ratio 3.25 t/t
• Recovery 82.5%
• Average annual production 222 kOz
• Life of mine 17 years
• Mining fleet, main equipment 5 Shovels Komatsu PC 3000 15 m3, 40 Trucks Komatsu HD1500 141 tons
• Ore crushing Two stage crushing to -65 mm and -40 mm, 2000 tph
• Ore transportation 5km conveyors from Crusher to Leach pad and to Ore dump
• Heap stockpiling Mobile stacker, Mobile reclaimer, 2000 tph
• Heap design: Dynamic leach pad, 150 days irrigation cycle, 12 m heap height
• Leaching process Steam heated cyanide solution, absorption to activated carbon
• Power and Heat supply Coal power plant, 16 MWt, coal consumption up to 140 000 tons per year
5 5
2014 Pilot Stage Operation Results
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Days
Gross 2014 pilot stage ore processing Gross 2014 pilot stage -40mm ore recovery dynamics
Expected
Actual
Excellent 2014 Gross pilot stage results fully confirmed Feasibility Study assumptions for gold recovery
1.8 Mt ore was processed in 2014, about 400 Kt of -40mm and -170mm crushed size ore at metallurgical test level
Gold recovery of 83.7% after 90 days irrigation was achieved for -40mm ore and 82.9% after 140 days for -170mm
This exceeds Feasibility Study parameters – recovery of 82.5% after irrigation period of 150 days for -40mm ore
High recovery of 82.5% for heap leaching assumed in FS is valid based on extensive metallurgical tests
programme
All metallurgical tests conducted to date produced consistently high recoveries in excess of 80%
Recovery
, %
6 6
Inflation and Costs Change Assumptions
The Gross economic model was done in February 2014
In February 2015 the model was adjusted for significant changes in Rouble and USD prices and RUB/USD exchange rate
There is no reliable external forecast for medium-term inflation in Russia and RUB/USD exchange rate in the market
Conservative estimates were done internally
The calculations of project Capex and Opex were done for different exchange rate scenarios,
in particular 50 and 60 RUB/USD
RUB and USD price change assumptions
A B C
1 Currency
2015 price change
estimates
Price change factor for
economic model
2 Imported equipment USD -10% -20% -10% -20%
3 Imported spare parts USD -10% -30% -10%
4 Imported materials USD -10% -30% -10%
5 Cianide USD -17% -10%
6 Russian equipment RUB +5% +20% +20% +30%
7 Russian spare parts RUB +5% +20% +20% +30%
8 Russian materials RUB +10% +20% +20% +30%
9 Diesel fuel RUB -8% +20%
10 Steam coal RUB +5% +20%
11 Service works RUB +10% +20%
12 Labor RUB +10% +20%
7 7
Excellent 2014 Gross pilot stage results fully confirmed Feasibility study assumptions
Gross main economic parameters
A B C D
1 1250 $/Oz gold scenario 2014 FS 2015 Update
2 Exchange rate, RUB/$ 33 50 60
3 Capital to first production, $ mln 303 262 239
4 Average Total Cash Costs, $/Oz 790 679 586
5 Average All-In Sustaining Costs, $/Oz 880 760 667
6 Average EBITDA, $ mln 107 136 152
7 NPV 10%, $ mln 181 425 531
8 Payback period, years * 6,5 3,8 3,3
9 IRR, % 19% 38% 47%
10 NPV 10% =0 breakeven gold price, $/Oz 1 095 885 795
* - from the start of main stage construction
2015 project economic
assessment update
Gross economic parameters have
significantly improved due to
Ruble devaluation
Economic model update was done
with assumptions for medium term
Rouble inflation in Russia and
USD price change for imported
equipment and materials
Calculations were done for two
exchange rate scenarios – 50 and
60 RUB/USD
Conclusions:
With new economic situation in Russia Gross demonstrates excellent economic efficiency with
IRR above 25% at gold price $1,100 and higher
Gross is still the largest project in Nordgold portfolio - with construction works start in the end of 2015
Gross can be put into production in 2017
2015 Project Update Summary
8 8
Gross Resource estimate as of the end of 2013 (SRK), 0.3 g/t cut-off grade
• M+I+I Resources 747 Mt at 0.56 g/t, 13.3 Moz of gold
Ore Reserve and mining schedule has been optimised by Nordgold.
Mining part of Hatch project is prepared in order to meet Russian Reserve
requirements
Single open pit has been optimised for Gross orebody at 0.4 g/t cut-off grade
Open pit parameters
• Total rock movement 836 M tons
• Ore reserve 192 M tons at 0.73 g/t, 2.3 g/t silver
• Gold 140 tons or 4.5 Moz
• Stripping ratio 3.25 t/t
• Pit slope angle 45 degrees
Three stages of pit development with two cut-backs and increases in waste
volumes. Lowest stripping ratio in the first years of production
Final open pit and waste dumps
Final open pit design and transport system
Gross Reserve and Open Pit Model
Gross ore body model and open pit, North-south cross section
9 9
Gross processing facilities location map
1
3
2
5
6
4
8
9
7
10
Gross main production facilities
1 Open pit
2 Crushers
3 Conveyor system
4 Leach pad
5 Solution ponds
6 Processing plant
7 Maintenance shops
8 Power plant
9 Camp
10 Spent ore dump
11 Precipitation pond
3
3
11
Due to difficult landscape and the lack of flat
terrain location of facilities has been selected
primarily to minimise rock movement for
construction
10 10
Dynamic Leach Pad Design
Dynamic leach pad technology
Due to hilly landscape around Gross we choose a dynamic
leach pad design
Leach pad is divided into 5 segments. At any time of the
cycle 2 segments are irrigated, 1 is prepared to irrigation, 1
is loaded with fresh ore and 1 is unloaded to ore dump
Dynamic leach pad main parameters
• Annual capacity 12 Mt of ore
• Total size 1200 x 600 m
• 5 segments each of 2.4 Mt of ore
• Heap height 12 m
• Stacker, reclaimer capacity of 2000 tph
• Irrigation cycle 150 days
• Cyanide solution is heated to +30 C degrees
Dynamic pad is implemented on a number of mines:
• 3 copper mines of Codelco (Chile), dynamic pads with
capacity 8,000-10,000 tph
• Copper mine of Barrick (Chile), capacity 5,000 tph
• Nickel mine of Talvivaara (Finland), capacity 2,000 tph
Current leach pad design was done with reserve in capacity
• Smaller pad with 4 segments instead of 5 and shorter
irrigation cycle, i.e. considerable Capital and Operating
costs reduction
• The decision was based on pilot stage metallurgical test
results
Dynamic leach pad and ore handling system
1200
60
0
Mobile
reclaimer
Conveyor
Conveyor
From
crusher
Mobile reclaimer
Mobile stacker
Main ore handling equipment
Mobile feeder
Mobile feeder
Heap
Heap
Irrigated
heap
Irrigated
heap
Heap
stockpiling Heap
unloading
To ore
dump
Mobile
stacker
11 11
Crushing circuit design
Gyration crusher design Dynamic leach pad technology
Two stage crushing circuit has been suggested for
Gross ore processing by Hatch
First stage crushing
• Gyration crusher is considered as the most cost
effective
• One crusher 2000 tph capacity
• Crushing size -65 mm
Second stage crushing
• Cone crushers
• Two crushers 1000 tph capacity each
• Crushing size -40 mm
Based on metallurgical tests it is expected that target
recovery can be achieved with one stage crushing
during first 5 years of Life of mine when the ore is more
oxidised
Second stage crushing will be included into technology
scheme from the sixth year of production
12 12
Gross Life of Mine Parameters
Our base case scenario assumes
gold price of US$1,250/oz and
exchange rate at RUR50/US$
Life of Mine, years 20
Initial Capex, US$ million 260
LOM Average Parameters
Ore mined, kt 12,000
Ore processed, kt 12,000
Strip ratio, t/t 3.3
Grade mined, g/t 0.70
Recovery, % 82.5
Annual production, koz 234
TCC, $/oz 679
AISC, $/oz 760
Annual sustaining Capex, $mln 18.5
13 13
Gross - Current Status and Next Steps
Current status
Hatch completed Feasibility study in February 2014
Pilot stage operation started in April 2014. Excellent results fully confirmed assumptions for gold
recovery
Gross ore Reserve has been approved by Russian state authority GKZ in November 2014
Feasibility study has been submitted in December 2014 and Environmental permit has been granted
in February 2015
Next steps
Continuing pilot stage operations in 2015
Obtaining formal project Construction permit in H2 2015
Detailed design works can be started in Q2-Q3 2015 and construction in 2015, subject to approval of
2015 budget and Construction permit receiving
With construction works start in the end of 2015 Gross can be put into production in 2017
Consider different options for Gross project financing
14 14
Project Summary
World class ore body: 4.5 Moz at 0.73 g/t at P&P Reserves and 8.6 Moz at 0.67 g/t
M,I&I Resources
Straightforward low cost heap leach metallurgy with excellent recovery rate at above
82.5%
Located just 5 km from Nordgold’s Neryungri mine with all necessary infrastructure
Feasibility study indicates very strong project economics with IRR above 25% at gold
price US$1,100/oz and higher
The successful pilot production confirms the project recovery, low cost and robust
economics. Decreases execution risk