polish, turkish and spanish questionnaire summary

26
Questionnaires on teaching methods Polish, Turkish and Spanish questionnaire summary

Upload: melinda-facer

Post on 28-Mar-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Polish, Turkish and Spanish questionnaire summary

Questionnaires on teaching methods

Polish, Turkish and Spanish

questionnaire summary

Page 2: Polish, Turkish and Spanish questionnaire summary

In this final product of our association we present our conclusions after having an in-depth look at the answers given by the students in our three institutions to the questionnaire created for them with the intention to check our teaching and their learning methods.

A number of 25 to 40 students filled the questionnaire in each institution.

You can see the results in graphs followed by a written comment with the comparison of the results in the three schools.

Page 3: Polish, Turkish and Spanish questionnaire summary

POLAND

CENTRUM KSZTALCENIA USTAWICZNEGO

Page 4: Polish, Turkish and Spanish questionnaire summary

SPAIN

CENTRO DE EDUCACION PARA PERSONAS ADULTAS

Page 5: Polish, Turkish and Spanish questionnaire summary

TURKEY

GEBZE DIRECTORATE OF NATIONAL EDUCATION

Page 6: Polish, Turkish and Spanish questionnaire summary

1. T

each

er’s

talk

2. D

emon

stra

tion

3. W

atch

ing

a vi

deo/

film

4. U

sing

the

proj

ecto

r in

class

5. B

lack

boar

d

6. T

each

er le

adin

g gr

oup

disc

ussio

ns

7. Fre

e clas

s di

scus

sion

s

8. V

isits

out

side

scho

ol

9. D

ictat

ion

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

2

4

8

7

16

10

11

5

44

5

2

9

10 10 10

6

4

0

11

7

6

1

7

6

8

9

0

3 3

2

0 0 0

3

4

0 0

2

1

0 0 0

1

4

0

4

5

2

0 0 0

4

2

A. WHOLE CLASS ACTIVITIES POLANDVery well Well Okay Not well Badly Can’t say

Page 7: Polish, Turkish and Spanish questionnaire summary

15

109

13

20

10

1

12

7

18

14

7

15

1716

11

8

56

9

7

9

4

7 7

4

11

12

10

23 3

10

10 0

1

8

2 2

0

4

1 1

4

109

5

A. WHOLE CLASS ACTIVITIES SPAINVery well Well Okay Not well Badly Can’t say

Page 8: Polish, Turkish and Spanish questionnaire summary

1. T

each

er’s

talk

2. D

emon

stra

tion

3. W

atch

ing

a vi

deo/

film

4. U

sing

the

proj

ecto

r in

class

5. B

lack

boar

d

6. T

each

er le

adin

g gr

oup

disc

ussio

ns

7. Fre

e clas

s di

scus

sion

s

8. V

isits

out

side

scho

ol

9. D

ictat

ion

0

5

10

15

20

25

14

2122

20

18

8

4

19

0

6

3 34

5

10

12

5 5

3

0 01 1

34

1

9

2

0 0 01

23

0

10

0 0 0 0 0

2 2

01

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

A. WHOLE CLASS ACTIVITIES TURKEY

Very well Well Okay Not well Badly Can’t say

Page 9: Polish, Turkish and Spanish questionnaire summary

The results show no significant differences in the three countries concerning questions 6, 7,8,and 9, with very similar numbers and all the options marked by an alike number of students in each country.Regarding the first questions, it seems the Turks prefer clearly more practical teaching methods using demonstrations, videos and films or the projector than the Polish or Spanish.The results in the three countries show that students are very confident with teachers using the blackboard in their explanations.

Page 10: Polish, Turkish and Spanish questionnaire summary

1. E

ssay

writ

ing

2. E

xam

pap

er q

uest

ions

3. W

orks

heet

s

4. S

elf p

rodu

ced

hand

outs

(the

mes

/pro

ject

s)

5. P

rivat

e st

udy

6. E

xper

imen

ts, i

nves

tigat

ion

7. R

egul

ar te

sts

8. E

nd o

f cou

rse/

mod

ule

test

s0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

6 6

4

7

2

11

2

4

11 11 11 11

13

4

10

8

7

10

11

6

7 7

14

11

1

0

1

3

4

2

1

22

0 0 0 0

1

0

2

0 0 0 0

1

2

0 0

B. INDIVIDUAL ACTIVITIES (I) POLANDVery well Well Okay Not well Badly Can’t say

Page 11: Polish, Turkish and Spanish questionnaire summary

7 7

12

89

5

1

4

10

14 14

1112

11

17

10

13

8

11

15

10

8

11 11

5

7

1

4 4

12

43 3

10

21

43

10 0 0

1

15

1

6

B. INDIVIDUAL ACTIVITIES (I) SPAINVery well Well Okay Not well Badly Can’t say

Page 12: Polish, Turkish and Spanish questionnaire summary

1. E

ssay

writ

ing

2. E

xam

pap

er q

uest

ions

3. W

orks

heet

s

4. S

elf p

rodu

ced

hand

outs

(the

mes

/pro

ject

s)

5. P

rivat

e st

udy

6. E

xper

imen

ts, i

nves

tigat

ion

7. R

egul

ar te

sts

8. E

nd o

f cou

rse/

mod

ule

test

s0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

6

5

4

2

7

8

18

6

3

7

12

5 5

9

4

11

12

10

9

13

1

5

2

5

4

3

0

4

2

3

1

3

0 0 0

1

0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

B. INDIVIDUAL ACTIVITIES (I) TURKEYVery well Well Okay Not well Badly Can’t say

Page 13: Polish, Turkish and Spanish questionnaire summary

In the three counties, the students are used to private study, worksheets and regular tests and give those a great value when learning, but the answer is not so clear about essays. The results show the Turks and Spaniards do not fancy essays or writing papers.

Opposed to Turkey and Poland, In Spain the students are not so used to experiments and investigation.

Page 14: Polish, Turkish and Spanish questionnaire summary

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

3

7

1

2

6

8

2

8

7

4

10

11

7

10

6

7

5

8

7

11

12

5

13

9

6

4

2 2 2 2

0

3

2 2

6

1

0

1

2

0

4

2

1

0 0

1

4

0

B. INDIVIDUAL ACTIVITIES (II) POLANDVery well Well Okay Not well Badly Can’t say

Page 15: Polish, Turkish and Spanish questionnaire summary

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

7

14

4

7

2

8

11

13

18

4

7

16

12

17

12

19

87

8

65

4

65

1 10

12

32

1

4

0 0 01

3

0 01

14

10

7

17

5

8

0

B. INDIVIDUAL ACTIVITIES (II) SPAINVery well Well Okay Not well Badly Can’t say

Page 16: Polish, Turkish and Spanish questionnaire summary

9. Lib

rary

rese

arch

/info

rmat

ion

seek

ing

10.V

isits

11. V

isito

rs

12. D

emon

stra

tion

13. I

nter

view

ing/

surv

eys

14. S

elf e

valu

atio

n

15. O

ne-to

-one

teac

hing

16. Q

uest

ion

and

answ

er in

clas

s0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

5

12

10

7

5

9

6

5

10

8

9

10

9

8

13

4

8

5

6

8

7 7

6

8

2

0 0 0

2

1

0

4

0 0 0 0

1

0 0

2

0 0 0 0

1

0 0

2

B. INDIVIDUAL ACTIVITIES (II) TURKEYVery well Well Okay Not well Badly Can’t say

Page 17: Polish, Turkish and Spanish questionnaire summary

In this second group, the answers are very varied about the use of the library in the three countries. The method of self evaluation is well-considered in the three countries.

Turks and Spanish like individual teaching more than Poles.

Significantly, the results show big differences in the use of visits outside the school and visitors coming for conferences as teaching methods, which are much more used in Poland or Turkey than Spain.

Page 18: Polish, Turkish and Spanish questionnaire summary

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

6 6

17

12

10

7

2

4

7

10

6

9 9

12

788

9

4

67

6

87

5

10 0

10

10

10 0 0 0 0 0

10 0 0 0 0

1

9

7

B. INDIVIDUAL ACTIVITIES (III) POLANDVery well Well Okay Not well Badly Can’t say

Page 19: Polish, Turkish and Spanish questionnaire summary

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

7

2

1416

1513

12

6

9

18

119

1110

9

5

16

108 8

5 5

34

4

1 10 0

23

43

1 1 1 1 13

54

3

7

3 34 4

5

16

B. INDIVIDUAL ACTIVITIES (III) SPAINVery well Well Okay Not well Badly Can’t say

Page 20: Polish, Turkish and Spanish questionnaire summary

17. R

eadi

ng te

xtbo

oks

18. R

eadi

ng j

ourn

als an

d ot

her m

ater

ials

19. U

se o

f the

inte

rnet

for p

erso

nal r

esea

rch

20. G

uide

d us

e of

the

inte

rnet

for p

ract

ice

21. C

ompu

ter a

ided

lear

ning

22. F

ollo

w mat

eria

ls o

nlin

e re

late

d with

you

r con

tent

s

23. F

ollo

w mod

ules

/cou

rses

spe

cific

ally

crea

ted

for y

our s

tudi

es o

nlin

e

24. C

omm

unicat

ion

with y

our t

each

er v

ia m

ail

0

5

10

15

20

25

23

21

5

10

54 4

78

4

7 78

43

10

7

0

4 4

65 55

2

0

54

67

8

1

3

0

3

0 01

3

0

2

01

0 0

4

2

B. INDIVIDUAL ACTIVITIES (III) TURKEYVery well Well Okay Not well Badly Can’t say

Page 21: Polish, Turkish and Spanish questionnaire summary

The results are very similar in the three countries regarding the use of the internet for investigations, which is highly estimated, especially in Turkey. However, the communication with the teachers via e-mail is practically non-existing in any of the countries. Computer-aided learning is equally well-considered in the three countries. Reading textbooks is better considered in Poland than Spain or Turkey, as a learning method. According to these results, Spanish students are more used to following courses on line than Poles or Turks.

Page 22: Polish, Turkish and Spanish questionnaire summary

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

C: SMALL GROUP ACTIVITIES POLANDVery well Well Okay Not well Badly Can’t say

Page 23: Polish, Turkish and Spanish questionnaire summary

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

23 3

7

43

65

9

6

15

8

5

9

1

8 8

10

2 2

43

5

3

1 10 0

1 12

12

3

1

24

10

15

1

19

23

16

C. SMALL GROUP ACTIVITIES SPAINVery well Well Okay Not well Badly Can’t say

Page 24: Polish, Turkish and Spanish questionnaire summary

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

C: SMALL GROUP ACTIVITIES TURKEYVery well Well Okay Not well Badly Can’t say

Page 25: Polish, Turkish and Spanish questionnaire summary

The results of the first three questions in this group show clearly the Spanish are less used to working in small groups than the Poles and Turkish. The Polish students are especially confident with this way of working and seem to like it. For sharing information on the web and group discussions using chat rooms, few or the students interviewed seemed to be familiar with these methods, especially in Spain and Turkey. About using games in the classroom for learning, the Poles and Turkish like the method more than Spanish who are less familiar with them.

Page 26: Polish, Turkish and Spanish questionnaire summary

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION