pioneer community development districtpioneercdd.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/pio... · 1/21/2019...

Pioneer

Community Development District 12051 Corporate Blvd., Orlando, FL 32817

Phone: 407-382-3256, Fax: 407-382-3254

www.pioneercdd.com

The meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Pioneer Community Development

District is scheduled for Monday, January 21, 2019 at 11:30 a.m. at 2379 Beville Road,

Daytona Beach, FL 32119. Following is the advance agenda for the meeting.

Call in Number: 855-747-8824 (New)

Participant/Guest code: 859458 (New)

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS’ MEETING AGENDA

• Roll Call to Confirm Quorum

• Public Comment Period [for any members of the public desiring to speak on any

proposition before the Board]

Business Matters

1. Consideration of Minutes of the December 17, 2018 Board of Supervisors’

Meeting

2. Consideration of the Minutes of the December 17, 2018 Audit Selection

Committee Meeting

3. Consideration of Minutes of the December 26, 2018 Continued Board of

Supervisors’ Meeting

4. Consideration of Resolution 2019-04, Declaring Special Assessments (under

separate cover)

a. Exhibit A- Engineers Report (under separate cover)

b. Exhibit B- Assessment Methodology Report (under separate cover)

c. Exhibit C- Lands Legal Description (under separate cover)

5. Consideration of Resolution 2019-05, Setting Public Hearing on Assessments

(under separate cover)

6. Consideration of Resolution 2019-06, Designating District Manager,

Assessment Consultant and Financial Advisor (Under separate cover)

• Exhibit A- Fishkind Agreements (Under separate cover)

7. Review of Notice Letter to VerdeGo, LLC

8. Ratification & Consideration of Funding Requests 154 & 155

9. Review of District Financial Statements

Other Business

• Staff Reports

o District Counsel

o District Engineer

o District Manager

• Audience Comments and Supervisors Requests

Adjournment

http://www.pioneercdd.com/

PIONEER

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

Consideration of Minutes of the December 17, 2018 Board of Supervisors’

Meeting

MINUTES OF MEETING Pioneer Community Development District Board of Supervisors Meeting Monday, December 17, 2018 at 11:30 a.m. 2379 Beville Road, Daytona Beach, FL 32119 Present and constituting a quorum: Kelly McCarrick Board Member Andy Hagan Board Member Jean Trinder Board Member Also present were: Vivian Carvalho District Manager- Fishkind & Associates Katie Buchanan Hopping Green & Sams (via phone) FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 11:43 a.m. and roll call was initiated. A quorum was established with the attendance of Board Members Kelly McCarrick, Andy Hagan, and Jean Trinder. Others in attendance are listed above. SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS Business Matters

Public Comment Period

There are no members of the public present at this time. Swearing in Newly Elected Supervisors

Ms. McCarrick was administered the Oath of Office prior to the Board Meeting.

Consideration of Minutes of the July 16, 2018 Board of Supervisors Meeting

The Board reviewed the minutes from the July 16, 2018 Board of Supervisors’ Meeting.

Consideration of Minutes of the November 19, 2018 Landowners’ Election Meeting

The Board reviewed the minutes from the November 19, 2018 Landowners’ Election Meeting.

Consideration of Resolution 2019-01, Canvassing and Certifying the Results of the Landowners’ Election

Ms. Carvalho explained that Ms. McCarrick received a total of 300 votes. Mr. Smith received a total of 275 votes and Ms. Schmieder received a total of 250 votes. Ms. McCarrick and Mr. Smith will each serve a 4-year term and Ms. Schmieder will serve a 2-year term.

On MOTION by Mr. Hagan, seconded by Ms. McCarrick, with all in favor, the Board approved the Minutes of the July 16, 2018 Board of Supervisors Meeting.

On MOTION by Ms. McCarrick, seconded by Mr. Hagan, with all in favor, the Board approved Resolution 2019-01, Canvassing and Certifying the Results of the Landowners’ Election.

On MOTION by Mr. Hagan, seconded by Ms. Trinder, with all in favor, the Board approved the Minutes of the November 19, 2018 Landowners’ Election Meeting.

Consideration of 2019-02, Electing District Officers

Ms. Carvalho explained that the current slate of officers are as follows; Ms. McCarrick as Chairman, Mr. Hagan as Vice-Chairman, and the remaining Board Members as Assistant Secretaries. Ms. Carvalho asked if the Board wanted to keep the slate the same.

Ratification of Funding Requests 139 – 153

The Board reviewed Funding Requests 139 – 153. Ms. McCarrick stated that she is nervous about ratifying funding requests that she has not previously signed.

Review of District Financial Statements

The Board reviewed the District Financial Statements. No action was required by the Board. THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS Other Business Staff Reports Attorney – Ms. Buchanan presented Resolution 2018-03 to the Board for approval. She explained that she reviewed the District’s Establishment Ordinance with the City of Port

On MOTION by Ms. McCarrick, seconded by Mr. Hagan, with all in favor, the Board approved Resolution 2019-02, Electing District Officers, as presented.

On MOTION by Ms. McCarrick, seconded by Mr. Hagan, with all in favor, the Board ratified Funding Requests 139, 141-143, 146-147, 152-153, Payment Authorization #01, and approved 140, 144, 145, 148, 150, and 151, subject to Chairman’s approval.

Orange and it required that the District come back to the City and authorize special powers by an interlocal agreement. She requested that the Board adopt Resolution 2019-03, authorizing District staff to petition the City for Recreation and Security Powers.

Engineer – Not Present Manager – No Report FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Audience Comments and

Supervisors Requests Ms. McCarrick requested to continue this meeting. FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Adjournment There was no other business to discuss. __________________________ ___________________________ Secretary/Assistant Secretary Chairperson/Vice Chairperson

On MOTION by Ms. McCarrick, seconded by Mr. Hagan, with all in favor, the December 17, 2018 Board of Supervisors Meeting of the Pioneer CDD was continued until December 26, 2018 at 11:30 a.m. at the same location.

On MOTION by Ms. McCarrick, seconded by Mr. Hagan, with all in favor, the Board approved Resolution 2019-03, authorizing special powers via an Interlocal Agreement, authorizing District Staff to petition the City for Recreation and Security Powers.

PIONEER


Consideration of the Minutes of the December 17, 2018 Audit Selection

Committee Meeting

MINUTES OF MEETING Pioneer Community Development District Auditor Selection Committee Meeting Monday, December 17, 2018 at 11:30 a.m. Present and constituting a quorum: Kelly McCarrick Committee Member Andy Hagan Committee Member Jean Trinder Committee Member Also present were: Vivian Carvalho Fishkind & Associates, Inc. Katie Buchanan Hopping Green & Sams (via phone) FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS Call to Order The Auditor Selection Committee Meeting for the Pioneer Community Development District was called to order at 11:52 a.m. and the names of those in attendance were announced. Committee Members Kelly McCarrick, Jean Trinder, and Andy Hagan constituted a quorum. SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS Review and Approval of Audit

Documents a) Audit RFP Notice b) Instructions to Proposers c) Evaluation Criteria- with and

without price

Ms. Carvalho stated that the purpose for the Audit Selection Committee meeting today is for the Committee to review and determine which evaluation criteria the Committee would like to include in the instructions either with or without price. Ms. McCarrick stated that in the past the committee has chosen to include price and suggested that if it is a company that the District has worked with before that should go under experience and understanding scope of work.

Ms. Carvalho asked the Committee when they would like District staff to proceed with the advertisement. The Board discussed having proposals due back by January 14, 2019 or to push it to February. Ms. McCarrick suggested waiting to advertise until after the new year and requested that proposals be due back by April 15, 2019 to make it consistent with the budget meetings. FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Adjournment There was no further business to discuss. Ms. Carvalho requested a motion to adjourn. __________________________ ___________________________ Secretary/Assistant Secretary Chairperson/Vice Chairperson

On MOTION by Mr. Hagan seconded by Ms. McCarrick, with all in favor, the December 17, 2018 Auditor Selection Committee meeting of the Pioneer CDD was adjourned.

On MOTION by Ms. McCarrick, seconded by Ms. Trinder, with all in favor, the Committee approved the Evaluation Criteria to include price.

PIONEER


Consideration of Minutes of the December 26, 2018 Continued Board of

Supervisors’ Meeting

MINUTES OF MEETING Pioneer Community Development District Continued Board of Supervisors Meeting Monday, December 26, 2018 at 11:33 a.m. 2379 Beville Road, Daytona Beach, FL 32119 Present and constituting a quorum: Kelly McCarrick Board Member Andy Hagan Board Member Jean Trinder Board Member Dick Smith Board Member Also present were: Vivian Carvalho Fishkind & Associates, Inc. (via phone) Venessa Ripoll Fishkind & Associates, Inc. (via phone) Katie Buchanan Hopping Green & Sams (via phone) FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 11:33 a.m. and roll call was initiated. A quorum was established with the attendance of Board Members Kelly McCarrick, Andy Hagan, Jean Trinder and Dick Smith. Others in attendance are listed above. FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Adjournment Ms. Ripoll requested a motion to continue the Board of Supervisors Meeting to January 11, 2019 at 11:00 a.m. at the current location.

__________________________ ___________________________ Secretary/Assistant Secretary Chairperson/Vice Chairperson

On MOTION by Ms. McCarrick, seconded by Mr. Smith, with all in favor, the December 26, 2018 Continued Board of Supervisors Meeting of the Pioneer CDD was continued until January 11, 2018 at 11:00 a.m. at the same location.

PIONEER


Consideration of Resolution 2019-04,

Declaring Special Assessments (under separate cover)

PIONEER


Exhibit A- Engineers Report (under separate cover)

PIONEER


Exhibit B- Assessment Methodology Report

(under separate cover)

PIONEER


Exhibit C- Lands Legal Description (under separate cover)

PIONEER


Consideration of Resolution 2019-05,

Setting Public Hearing on Assessments (under separate cover)

PIONEER


Consideration of Resolution 2019-06, Designating District Manager, Assessment

Consultant and Financial Advisor (Under separate cover)

PIONEER


Exhibit A- Fishkind Agreements (Under separate cover)

PIONEER


Review of Notice Letter to VerdeGo, LLC

13901 Sutton Park Drive South, Suite 200 Jacksonville, Florida 32224-0119

p 904.739.3655 f 904.730.3413 www.prosserinc.com

Community Management Energy Relationships,

November 28, 2018

T.J. McNitt VerdeGo Landscape 3335 North State Street, PO Box 789 Bunnell, FL 32110

Dear T.J.,

Based on the field inspections of the landscape work on 8/8/2018 & 10/19/2018, Prosser has

developed recommendations outlining corrective items needed, see attached Landscape

Replacement & Maintenance Recommendations letter, dated 11/27/2018. It has been determined

the corrective work must be completed in order for the project to be acceptable, per the project

plans & specifications.

Please develop a detailed action plan and timetable to complete the required work, and then

submit to us for review.

Prosser is available to meet on‐site, as well as attend nursery inspections, as may be needed. Feel

free to contact me with any additional questions or comments.

Thank‐you,

Paul Moss Senior Landscape Architect Attachments cc David Haas, ICI Homes Dick Smith, ICI Homes Doug Ross, ICI Homes

Mark Grande, Zev Cohen & Assoc. Shawn Bliss, Prosser

PROJECT MEMORANDUM TO: David Haas, ICI Homes FROM: Prosser - Shawn Bliss / Paul Moss DATE: November 27, 2018 RE: South Williamson Blvd. – Landscape Replacement and Maintenance Recommendations The intent of this document is to provide recommendations to the landscape contractor, VerdeGo on the process needed for the replacement of plant materials, as well as improvements to plant materials to remain – all in accordance with the contract documents. The items below are based on the report from the arborist, Russell Adams with Target Engineering, dated 11/7/2018 (attached) and subsequent discussions with him to clarify recommendations.

1. Soil Test Samples – Perform lime & fertilizer recommendations per soil test results attached, throughout median areas to include turf.

2. Irrigation Scheduling – Adjust irrigation scheduling to provide proper watering amounts to allow full establishment of all plant materials, see Russell Adams’ report attached.

3. Sylvester Palms – Remove and replace all palms which are below Florida Fancy specifications, assumed to be all palms per the latest site inspection. Provide supplier information for replacement palms for possible nursery inspection. Palms to be reviewed on-site by Russell Adams at time of delivery. Follow palm planting and establishment recommendations in Russell Adams’ report.

4. Trees, Shrubs & Groundcovers - Remove and replace all plant materials that fall below FL#1 requirements, as well as all plant materials impacted by palm replacements.

5. Fertilization – Fertilize all plant landscape materials with 8N-2P2O5-12K2O +4Mg, 100% of the N, K, and Mg to be in slow release form (see attached label)

6. Post Replacement Site Inspection – Perform site inspection with Prosser and Russell Adams to develop punch list of any outstanding items.

7. Final Acceptance & Warranty Period – Upon the completion of all contract requirements and all punch list items, VerdeGo will be notified in writing of Final Acceptance, which will then begin the Warranty Period.

2610 NW 43rd Street, Suite 2AGainesville, FL 32606

Telephone: (352)226-8447

November 7, 2018

Prosser, Inc.Attn: Paul S. Moss, Jr. R.L.A.

Senior Landscape Architect

Observations and Conclusions of Site Visit

At South Williamson Blvd. Extension

Russell Adams: Target Engineering Group

I attended a site meeting on Friday, 19 October 2018 for the landscape project at South Williamson Boulevard.

Also, at the meeting were Paul Moss from the Prosser Design Team, Dick Smith from ICI Homes and Ryan Seifert ProjectManager from Verde Go Landscape Contractor

The purpose of the meeting was to evaluate the health and condition of the landscape plantings and to makerecommendations on how to improve the conditions of the plant material.

Many of the plants observed during the inspection were exhibiting signs of extreme drought. Medjool palms (a verydrought tolerant palm species) had frond leaflets that were folded and silvery in color (see attached photo 1224). Thiscondition is indicative of severe drought conditions for this species. Some oaks were stressed to the point that no greenleaves remained (1225). Upon excavation around the root ball we discovered that while the Medjool palms had rootedinto the surrounding soil (1230), the Phoenix sylvestris had not (1256). The lack of roots accounted for the appearance ofthe canopy (1253, 1254). Phoenix sylvestris is a water loving palm that will not survive prolonged drought conditions.

I asked Ryan what the frequency and duration of the irrigation cycles were. He informed me that the irrigation systemhad been off for some months and that tree bubblers were still off. Only spray zones were programed in the clock tocover some recently replaced material and to facilitate recent fertilization. Ryan said that his company suspected thatthe site was wet and had crimped the bubblers on the palms. Paul photographed irrigation bubblers crimped off 30 daysafter planting (PM01). Observations of 2.5’ to 3’ deep holes during the inspection showed no signs of water in them(1245). Also, this roadway is elevated 5’ to 6’ above the native soil level which should facilitate drainage. The soil wascompacted below 6” from the surface, but not enough to hinder root growth. Sampling of soil throughout the projectindicated that most soil observed was very dry.

Ryan said he would research frequency and rainfall equivalents of the irrigation system and get back with me. Ryan alsostated that the project had recently been fertilized and would get me the label and rate of fertilizer used.During the inspection we also noted dead and declining groundcovers throughout the planting beds. The sporadic andrandom decline was from a variety of causes including scale infestation of Dwarf Burford Holly (1237). Herbicide drift onroses, plumbago, and Dwarf Burford Holly (1243, 1246). Undoubtedly drought was also a contributing factor to thedecline of groundcovers.

Five soil samples from various medians throughout the project limits, marked with labeled orange irrigation flags. Thesoil samples were submitted to the IFAS Soils Lab (results attached).

2610 NW 43rd Street, Suite 2AGainesville, FL 32606

Telephone: (352)226-8447

Many of the landscape plantings may recover with proper water and fertilizer management. However, I believe thePhoenix sylvestris are too far gone to recover.

The most likely cause of decline and death of P sylvestris is lack of water. The foliage on these palms are desiccated andbrown. The lack of roots in the root ball soil interface indicated that the roots never established in the soil. Furthermore,the original root ball was dry and intact. Had the palms died from root rot due to excessive water, the root tissue wouldhave been degraded and easily sloughed off by touch. This was not the case.

It is my belief that the P sylvestris would have survived with proper water and fertilizer management.

Assuming the contractor will replace palms that have failed I offer the following guidelines for proper palm planting andestablishment.

1. Conduct a percolation test to ensure that surface water drains three feet in 24 hours.2. Plant palms the same day they are delivered.3. Plant palms at the trees at the same grade that they were grown in the nursery.4. Excavate a planting pit large enough to allow for proper backfilling.5. Backfill with unamended native soil, making sure to compact in lifts to ensure that there are no air pockets on

the backfill.6. Create a tree ring at least one foot larger that the root ball and high enough to ensure that the ring holds water

for a period before draining down.7. Water thoroughly at the time of planting, filling the tree ring several times and allow to completely drain down

between watering.8. Irrigate with two to four bubblers per tree.9. Apply 40 gallons of water per tree per application.10. Water daily for the 2-4 weeks depending on environmental conditions.11. Monitor trees for new root growth. As roots begin to grow into the surrounding soil maintain irrigation quantity

but slowly decrease frequency from daily to every other day, then twice a week, and eventually weekly.12. Do not fertilize at the time of planting. Thirty days after planting, fertilize with 8N-2P2O5-12K2O +4Mg, it is

essential that 100% of the N, K, and Mg in such a fertilizer be in slow release form (see attached label).13. Use 1.5 pounds of 8-2-12+4 per 100 square feet (10’x 10’ square or circle with a 5.6’radius) do not clump or

band fertilizer, spread out evenly over the area.14. Fertilize at three-month intervals to ensure constant and even nutrient availability.

pmoss

Text Box

Photo #1224 Medjool Palm Stressed

pmoss

Text Box

Photo #1225 Live Oak Stressed

pmoss

Text Box

Photo #1230 Medjool Palm Roots

pmoss

Text Box

Photo #1237 Dwarf Burford Infestation

pmoss

Text Box

Photo #1243 Drift Rose - Potential Herbicide Drift

pmoss

Text Box

Photo #1245 Dry Planting Hole

pmoss

Text Box

Photo #1246 Plumbago - Stressed / Dead

pmoss

Text Box

Photo #1253 Stressed Sylvester Palms

pmoss

Text Box

Photo #1254 Stressed Sylvester Palms

pmoss

Text Box

Photo #1256 Sylvester Palm - Lack of Roots

Photo # PM01Crimped Irrigation

30-Oct-18 Page 1 of 13Print date:

UF/IFAS Analytical Services LaboratoriesExtension Soil Testing Laboratory

Wallace Building 631 PO Box 110740 Gainesville, FL 32611-0740Email: [email protected] Web: soilslab.ifas.ufl.edu Phone #:352-392-1950

Landscape And Vegetable Garden Test Report

For further information contact:

Russell Adams15321 North SR-121Gainesville FL, 32653

Tel: (352)575-8750

Sewards, Joseph J.Volusia County Coop Extn Service3100 E New York AveDeland FL, 32724-6410Tel: 386-822-5778Email: [email protected]

To:

Client Identification: SWB-1 Set Number: E51172 Lab Number: E130009Report Date: 30-Oct-18

Woody orn/trees in the landscapeCrop:SOIL TEST RESULTS AND THEIR INTERPRETATIONS

Target pH: 6.0pH (1:2 Sample:Water) 7.4

A-E Buffer Value:

Mehlich-3 ExtractablePhosphorus (mg/Kg or ppm P) 44

Potassium (mg/Kg or ppm K) 48Magnesium (mg/Kg or ppm Mg) 113

Calcium (mg/Kg or ppm Ca) > 3285

LIME AND FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONSCrop: Woody orn/trees in the landscape

LOW MED HIGH

Lime: 0.00 lbs per 1000 sq. ft.Nitrogen(N): 2.30 lbs per 1000 sq. ft.

Phosphorous(P2O5): 0.40 lbs per 1000 sq. ft.Potassium(K2O): 0.70 lbs per 1000 sq. ft.Magnesium(Mg): 0.00 lbs per 1000 sq. ft.

Buffer pH is the pH of your soil in Adams-Evans Buffer(A-E Buffer). This isdone to determine the lime requirement, which will help increase the soil pH tothe target pH level desired by the crop.

This is the pH of your sample in the water mediumThis is the pH at which the above crop will grow at its optimum


These interpretations and recommendations are based upon soil test results and research/experience with the specified crop underFlorida's growing conditions. We do not test soil for N as there is no meaningful soil test for predicting N availability. Thus, the Nrecommendation was developed from research that measured response of the indicated crop to applied N fertilizer. If you expectsignificant nutrient release from organic sources such as crop residues or organic amendments, estimate the amount mineralized andsubtract that amount from the fertilizer recommendations given below to arrive at crop needs.UF/IFAS fertilizer and lime recommendations are advisory in nature and emphasize efficient fertilizer use and environmentallysound nutrient management without losses of yield or crop quality. It is generally assumed that the nutrients will be supplied frompurchased, commercial fertilizer and that expected crop yields and quality will be typical of economically viable production.Growers should consider UF/IFAS recommendations in the context of their entire management strategy, such as return on investmentin fertilizer and the benefits of applying manure or biosolids (sewage sludge) to their land.

Footnotes are printed wherever applicable. These footnotes are an integral part of fertilization recommendations. Please readthem carefully.Set Footnote(s): 1, 650, 653, 654







Tel: (352)575-8750


To:




A-E Buffer Value:



Calcium (mg/Kg or ppm Ca) > 1128


LOW MED HIGH

Lime: 0.00 lbs per 1000 sq. ft.Nitrogen(N): 2.30 lbs per 1000 sq. ft.










Tel: (352)575-8750


To:




A-E Buffer Value:7.57

Mehlich-3 ExtractablePhosphorus (mg/Kg or ppm P) > 121


Calcium (mg/Kg or ppm Ca) 456


LOW MED HIGH

Lime: 31 lbs per 1000 sq. ft.Nitrogen(N): 2.30 lbs per 1000 sq. ft.






Footnotes are printed wherever applicable. These footnotes are an integral part of fertilization recommendations. Please readthem carefully.Set Footnote(s): 1, 650, 653, 654, 802







Tel: (352)575-8750


To:




A-E Buffer Value:7.53



Calcium (mg/Kg or ppm Ca) 149


LOW MED HIGH

Lime: 49 lbs per 1000 sq. ft.Nitrogen(N): 2.30 lbs per 1000 sq. ft.










Tel: (352)575-8750


To:



Target pH: 6.0 This is the pH at which the above crop will grow at its optimum

pH (1:2 Sample:Water) 8.0 This is the pH of your sample in the water medium

A-E Buffer Value: Buffer pH is the pH of your soil in Adams-Evans Buffer(A-E Buffer). This is done todetermine the lime requirement, which will help increase the soil pH to the target pHlevel desired by the crop. However since your samples' pH is higher than the target, theAE buffer pH is not applicable.

AB-DTPA Extractable Nutrients

PHOSPHORUS (mg/Kg or ppm P) 4

POTASSIUM (mg/Kg or ppm K) 15

MAGNESIUM (mg/Kg or ppm Mg) 14

CALCIUM (mg/Kg or ppm Ca) 391


LOW HIGH

Lime: 0.00 lbs per 1000 sq. ft.Nitrogen: 2.30 lbs per 1000 sq. ft.


The above recommendations for K and Mg are provided based on the crop needs since no interpretation for these nutrientswas found using AB-DTPA extraction method. Nitrogen recommendation is based on research data not on any soil test.The soil has been determined to be calcareous in nature because of its pH(>=7.4). At this pH, AB-DTPA extraction methodwas found suitable. However, only Phosphorus(P) was calibrated. No calibration was possible for Potassium(K) andMagnesium(Mg). Therefore, the recommendations for K and Mg are provided solely for successful crop performance andyields. Nitrogen(N) recommendations are provided based on research data and not on a soil test. Research studies areunderway at different locations in the state to identify an appropriate extraction method for improved interpretations andrecommendations for these soils. At that time, the recommendations will be modified, as appropriate.For further information, please contact:Dr. Yuncong Li, soils specialist, UF/IFAS TREC-Homestead18905 SW 280 St, Homestead, FL 33031Email: [email protected] Fax: 305-246-7003



Footnotes are printed wherever applicable. These footnotes are an integral part of fertilization recommendations. Please readthem carefully.Set Footnote(s): 650, 653, 654, 806, 819




Note # Recommendations1 Soil test values noted with a ">" sign exceeded the normal working range of our extraction method

and are interpreted as high or very high for P, K, or Mg. No positive plant response to addition of thenutrient is likely. In some circumstances, addition of this nutrient to the soil could be detrimental toplant performance or to the environment.

650 Indicated fertilizer amounts, coupled with nutrients already in the soil, will satisfy the crop-nutrientrequirement for this growing season. Fertilizer and water management are linked. Maximumfertilizer efficiency is achieved only with close attention to water management. Supply only enoughirrigation water to satisfy plant requirements and minimize leaching conditions.

653 Established trees (more than three to five years since transplanting) do not need routine fertilization.

For recently-planted trees, broadcast fertilizer within a diameter of 1.5 times the dripline diameter.654 Broadcast P2O5 either in one application or as half the recommended amount in each of two

applications during the growing season. To minimize leaching losses, broadcast N and K2O in smallincrements throughout the growing season. Schedule one application every 12 weeks (three timesper growing season), adding 33% of the recommended amount of N and K2O at each application. Toinsure equal coverage when fertilizer rates are small, blend all compatible fertilizers.

802 Recommendations are based on the Adams-Evans lime requirement test which is run on all mineralsoils. When the recommended amount of lime is incorporated in the surface 6 inches of soil, soil pHshould adjust to a level above which additional liming benefit is not expected. Excessive applicationsof lime can result in nutritional disorders.

806 Apply the equivalent of 35 lb Mg/A, or 0.8 lb Mg per 1000 sq. ft., in a soluble form, such asmagnesium sulfate or potassium magnesium sulfate.

819 The pH of this soil is quite high. If this is a natural condition (i.e. if it is not from the over-applicationof lime), it is generally impractical to lower the soil pH with soil ammendments. Use plant speciesthat are tolerant of high soil pH.

This data report has been issued on the authority of Dr. Rao Mylavarapu, Laboratory Director, Mr. Jamin Bergeron, Laboratory Manager, and Mrs.Nancy Wilkinson, QA Officer, in support of Florida Cooperative Extension Services.




MICRO-NUTRIENTS REQUESTED BY THE CLIENT


Russell Adams15321 North SR-121Gainesville FL 32653

Tel: (352)575-8750


To:

SetNum: 51172

Lab Number SampleIdentification

Copper Manganese Zinc

mg/kg in the soil

Organic Matter

%

Electrical Conductivity

dS/mE130009 SWB-1 0.85 5.93 3.37E130010 SWB-2 0.35 9.09 2.12E130011 SWB-3 0.30 0.31 0.99E130012 SWB-4 0.22 0.39 0.73E130013 SWB-5 0.27 0.52 0.72




INTERPRETATION OF MICRONUTRIENT SOIL TESTSThe IFAS Extension Soil Testing Laboratory currently offers a soil test for three micronutrients, copper (Cu), manganese (Mn), and zinc (Zn).Interpretations in terms of plant needs of the particular nutrients are still quite tentative. They are presented here with the understanding that othercriteria such as crop production records and observation of deficiency symptoms should be used along with the test results in reaching themanagement decision concerning micronutrient fertilization.Interpretation of extractable Cu, Mn, and Zn depends on the soil pH. The critical soil levels for these nutrients increase with pH for crops grown onacid sandy soils of Florida. Micronutrient availability in the alkaline pH range is better evaluated with a plant tissue test or with soil test extractantsdeveloped especially for alkaline soils.Indiscriminate use of micronutrient soil tests should be avoided. However, if plant performance has been less than optimum in the past and the soiltest levels are below those shown in the tables, fertilization with the respective micronutrients may be indicated.

COPPERIn Florida, Cu deficiencies have been generally confined to soils high in organic matter and so-called “new ground” just coming into cultivation inthe flatwood areas. Known Cu phytotoxicity occurs in citrus groves and vegetable crop areas where Cu applied in fungicides and fertilizers hasaccumulated in the soil over the years. Liming to pH 7.0 is the simplest means of overcoming phytotoxicity.Table 1 provides guidelines for interpreting the IFAS Micronutrient Soil Test values for extractable Cu in mineral soils. Dilute acids are poorextractants of Cu on organic soils and do not give reliable estimates of crop responses. The IFAS Soil Testing Lab does not presently provide a Cusoil test for organic soils.Application of 3 to 5 pounds elemental Cu per acre (as copper sulfate or finely ground copper oxide) will correct Cu deficiencies in most cropsgrowing on mineral soils. Mixing these Cu sources with macronutrient fertilizers presents no agronomic problems, provided segregation of thematerials is avoided. A single Cu application may be sufficient for several years. Do not repeat this application until soil or tissue tests indicate a needfor Cu. Copper added to soil is there “forever” and Florida already has too many cases of soils with phytotoxic levels of Cu. Fertilizer Cu should notbe applied to mineral soils where Cu will be used as a pesticide.

Table 1. Tentative interpretation of extractable Cu in mineral soils

Soil pH Minerals Soils Only

Level below which there may be a crop response to applied Cu

Level above which Cu phytotoxicity may occur

5.5-6.0 6.0-6.5 6.5-7.0

0.5*0.1-0.3 0.3-0.5

5.0**2.0-3.0 3.0-5.0

ppm

*If in doubt about copper nutrition of crop, get a tissue test

MANGANESEThere has been some success in predicting crop response to fertilizer Mn with extractable Mn. Lack of success in some cases has resulted from thecomplex nature of soil Mn and the many factors that affect its uptake by plants. Levels in table 2 are suggested as a guide for interpreting extractableMn in mineral and organic soils.Application of 8 to 10 pounds elemental Mn (as manganese sulfate or manganese oxide) per acre in banded fertilizer is recommended when the soiltest levels are below those shown in Table 2. Broadcast applications are less effective and the rate should be increased to 20 or 30 pounds Mn if thefertilizer is broadcast. Uptake of Mn is generally best when Mn is banded with acid forming fertilizers. Field crops most likely to give a yieldresponse to applied Mn in Florida are soybeans, small grains, and irrigated corn. Sugarcane grown on organic soils having pHs above 6.5 will alsorespond to banded Mn fertilizer.

ZINCTable 2 presents a guide to interpretation of extractable Zn in both mineral and organic soils. Where Zn fertilization is needed, application rates mayvary considerably with crop and Zn source but generally are around 5 to 10 pounds Zn per acre. For tree crops, use tissue tests to determine if Znfertilization is needed, and it is known that no Zn is applied in the spray program.

The critical values shown in Table 2 are higher than those used in other states of the Southeastern U.S. and reflect a significant “margin of safety” ininterpretation of the test results. These critical levels may be modified as results from field trials justify such changes.

Table 2. Interpretive guide to extractable Mn and Zn

Soil pH Minerals Soils Only

6.0-6.5

Level below which there may be a crop response to applied Mn

6.5-7.0

7-9

ppm

0.5-1.00.5

5.5-6.0

Level below which there may be a crop response to applied Zn

5-73-5

1.0-3.0

PIONEER


Ratification & Consideration of Funding Requests 154 & 155

PIONEER


Review of District Financial Statements

General Fund Total

$2,195.72 $2,195.72

7,334.60 7,334.60

1,257.61 1,257.61

$10,787.93 $0.00 $10,787.93

$10,787.93 $0.00 $10,787.93

$1,194.66 $1,194.66

$983.40 983.40

$1,194.66 $983.40 $2,178.06

$1,194.66 $983.40 $2,178.06

$2,938,580.96 $2,938,580.96

(2,929,163.11) (2,929,163.11)

175.42 175.42

($425.00) (425.00)

(558.40) (558.40)

$9,593.27 ($983.40) $8,609.87

$10,787.93 $0.00 $10,787.93

Pioneer Community Development DistrictStatement of Financial Position

As of 12/31/2018

Construction Fund

Assets

Current AssetsGeneral Checking Account

General Checking - CNB

Accounts Receivable - Due from Developer

Total Current Assets

Total Assets

Liabilities and Net Assets

Current LiabilitiesAccounts Payable

Accounts Payable

Net Assets, Unrestricted

Current Year Net Assets, Unrestricted

Total Net Assets

Total Liabilities and Net Assets

Total Current Liabilities

Total Liabilities

Net AssetsNet Assets, Unrestricted

Net Assets - General Government

Current Year Net Assets - General Government

Total

$38,571.03

$0.00 $38,571.03

$2,627.00

2,499.99

12.50

1,268.87

71.03

225.00

175.00

62.95

529.01

3,415.00

27,509.68

$558.40 558.40

$558.40 $38,954.43

$0.42

$0.00 $0.42

($558.40) ($382.98)

($425.00) $8,992.85

($983.40) $8,609.87

Pioneer Community Development DistrictStatement of Activities

As of 12/31/2018

General Fund Construction Fund

Revenues

Developer Contributions $38,571.03

Total Revenues $38,571.03

Expenses

Public Official Insurance $2,627.00

District Management 2,499.99

District Counsel 12.50

Legal Advertising 1,268.87

Miscellaneous Office & Admin 71.03

Web Site Maintenance 225.00

Dues, Licenses, and Fees 175.00

Electric 62.95

Water- Reclaimed 529.01

$175.42

General Insurance 3,415.00

Landscaping Maintenance & Material 27,509.68

Engineering

Total Expenses $38,396.03

Net Assets At Beginning Of Year $9,417.85

Net Assets At End Of Year $9,593.27

Other Revenues (Expenses) & Gains (Losses)

Interest Income $0.42

Total Other Revenues (Expenses) & Gains (Losses) $0.42

Change In Net Assets

Actual Budget Variance FY 2019 Adopted Budget

$ 38,571.03 $ 81,056.25 $ (42,485.22) $ 324,225.00

$ 38,571.03 $ 81,056.25 $ (42,485.22) $ 324,225.00

$ 2,627.00 $ 725.00 $ 1,902.00 $ 2,900.00

2,499.99 2,500.00 (0.01) 10,000.00

- 1,875.00 (1,875.00) 7,500.00

12.50 1,875.00 (1,862.50) 7,500.00

- 1,250.00 (1,250.00) 5,000.00

1,268.87 625.00 643.87 2,500.00

- 50.00 (50.00) 200.00

71.03 187.50 (116.47) 750.00

27,509.68 43,750.00 (16,240.32) 175,000.00

- 6,000.00 (6,000.00) 24,000.00

- 3,000.00 (3,000.00) 12,000.00

- 1,500.00 (1,500.00) 6,000.00

225.00 225.00 - 900.00

175.00 43.75 131.25 175.00

- 12,500.00 (12,500.00) 50,000.00

- 1,250.00 (1,250.00) 5,000.00

- 1,250.00 (1,250.00) 5,000.00

591.96 1,500.00 (908.04) 6,000.00

3,415.00 950.00 2,465.00 3,800.00

$ 38,396.03 $ 81,056.25 $ (42,660.22) $ 324,225.00

$ 38,396.03 $ 81,056.25 $ (42,660.22) $ 324,225.00

$ 175.00 $ - $ 175.00 $ -

Total General & Administrative Expenses

Total Expenses

Pond Maintenance - Boulevard

Pond Maintenance - Neighborhood Lake Banks

O&M Contingency

Net Income (Loss)

Web Site Maintenance

Dues, Licenses, and Fees

Water- Reclaimed

Trustee Fees

District Management

Engineering

District Counsel

Legal Advertising

Bank Fees

General Insurance

Office Misc(Travel, postage, supplies, copies, etc.)

Landscape Maintenance - Boulevard

Landscape Maintenance - Neighborhood Lake Banks

Dissimentation

Pioneer Community Development DistrictBudget to Actual

For the Month Ending 12/31/2018

Audit

Year To Date

RevenuesDeveloper Contributions

Net Revenues

General & Administrative ExpensesPublic Official Insurance