philosophy of religion - thinking differently

35
DAY 13-14: NO SOUL, EXPLANATIONS OF RELIGION PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION

Upload: others

Post on 27-Dec-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

D A Y 1 3 - 1 4 : N O S O U L , E X P L A N A T I O N S O F R E L I G I O N

PHILOSOPHY OF

RELIGION

Page 2: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

REVIEW FROM LAST CLASS

• During our last class we looked at the following question concerning the soul, death, and human destiny:

• 1) What do people believe?

• 2) Is there evidence to support these beliefs?

• 3) Is life more or less meaningful if death is the end of all consciousness?

• I said there seems to be 5 possibilities pertaining to life after death.

Page 3: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

REVIEW: SUMMARY SO FAR

• # 1. You will exist as an immaterial soul after death.

• # 2. You will exist as a soul in a different body after death.

• # 3. You will exist as a soul in the same body after death.

• # 4. There is no “You” that exists after death.

Page 4: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

REVIEW:#4. THERE IS NO “YOU” THAT EXISTS AFTER DEATH

Bertrand Russell (1872-1970)

British Philosopher, Mathematician

• So why belief in life after death?

• Because we fear it.

• So, we needed a psychological way to cope; to function.

• Life after death then is an assumed truth (Sound familiar?)

Page 5: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

Epicurus (341-270 BC) - Greek Philosopher

REVIEW:#4. THERE IS NO “YOU” THAT EXISTS AFTER DEATH

Death is not the problem!

“Death, the most dreaded of evils, is …of no concern to us, for while we exist death is not present, and when death is present, we no longer exist.”

Page 6: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

• Fear of death is the problem.

• Did you have any issues before you were born? No difference.

• Life after death is not the goal of life. A good life of moderation is the goal.

• “a life that is happy is better than one that is merely long.” -Lucretius

Epicurus (341-270 BC) - Greek Philosopher

REVIEW:#4. THERE IS NO “YOU” THAT EXISTS AFTER DEATH

Page 7: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

#4. THERE IS NO “YOU” THAT EXISTS

AFTER DEATH

• Purpose of life on Earth:

• Some say none.

• “To live a good life in moderation.” (Epicurus)

• Destiny:

• To no longer exist. To die?

• Is this a beneficial belief?

Page 8: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

SUMMARY SO FAR

• # 1. You will exist as an immaterial soul after death.

• # 2. You will exist as a soul in a different body after death.

• # 3. You will exist as a soul in the same body after death.

• # 4. There is no “You” that exists after death.

• # 5?

Page 9: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

THE BUDDHA

Buddha is not a name!

Buddha = “enlightened one”

Siddhartha Siddhartha Siddhartha Siddhartha Gautama Gautama Gautama Gautama –––– noble birth in noble birth in noble birth in noble birth in India, 563 B.C.E.India, 563 B.C.E.India, 563 B.C.E.India, 563 B.C.E.

Page 10: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

#5. THERE NEVER WAS A “YOU”

Buddha (563-483 BC?)

• No permanent self. If you notice, “I” is always changing.

• Your sense of permanent, separate self is just a story the brain concocts to make sense of the world.

• PG 115: “ A child grows up to be a man of sixty. Certainly the man of sixty is not the same as the child of sixty years ago, nor is he another person.”

• Root of suffering is the belief in a permanent/separate “I”• Permanence: We cling & become attached to impermanent things.• Separate: Fear others, selfish desires, anxiety over “me” & “mine”

• Best then not to think of an “I” that will exist after death. Perpetuates the problem. (not Tibetan, nor Pure Land)

• In contrast to Hinduism: Instead of trying to remember who you are, best to concentrate on the idea that there is no “I” that needs to remember.

Page 11: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

SUMMARY SO FAR

• # 1. You will exist as an immaterial soul after death.

• # 2. You will exist as a soul in a different body after death.

• # 3. You will exist as a soul in the same body after death.

• # 4. There is no “You” that exists after death.

• # 5. There never was a “you” in the first place.

Questions:

1. Out of the four options presented so far, which of them would you most like to be true and why?

2. What kind of proof would you require to convince you that it is true?

Page 12: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

#5. THERE NEVER WAS A “YOU”

• Purpose of Life on Earth:

• To end suffering caused by false beliefs in permanence and separation.

• Destiny:

• Why occupy your thoughts about a future that never comes. Why not open your eyes and appreciate a present that’s always here.

Page 13: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

DEATH & THE AFTERLIFE

• Many explanations for what may happen after death.

• Many explanations why we believe these explanations. Can you name some?

• They are true.

• They are partially true.

• We want them to be true.

• We need them to be true.

• Is this the origin of all religions?

Page 14: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

NATURALISTIC EXPLANATIONS OF

RELIGION

Attempts to naturally explain why religions exist beyond the possibility that they are literally true.

Page 15: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

Sir Edward B. Tylor (1832-1917)Social Evolutionist

• According to Tylor, “ancient savage philosophers” were impressed by two groups of biological problems:

• 1) What is it that makes the difference between a living body and a dead one: what causes sleep, trance, disease, and death?

• 2) What are these human shapes which appear in dreams and visions?

• Their Explanation:• A spirit or soul, derived from the experience of human souls or spirits in

“dreams and waking hallucinations” animates lifeless objects such as sticks or stones, trees, mountains, rivers, etc.

SOUL:

IS THIS THE ORIGIN OF RELIGION?

Page 16: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

• These spirits could be helpful or harmful to humans and had personalities that could be offended or flattered

• Therefore “primitive” societies would seek to appease these spirits, and avoid offending them, through prayer, ritual, and sacrifice

• Animism – “to animate”

THEORY ONE: ANIMISM

Page 17: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

THEORY ONE: ANIMISM

Religion Evolved from “Primitive” to “Sophisticated”

Let’s see the theoretical progression…

Page 18: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

1. Animistic Understanding of the World

THEORY ONE: ANIMISMRELIGION EVOLVED FROM “PRIMITIVE” TO “SOPHISTICATED”

Page 19: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

2. Ancestor Worship

THEORY ONE: ANIMISMRELIGION EVOLVED FROM “PRIMITIVE” TO “SOPHISTICATED”

Page 20: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

3. Worship of various aspects of nature

THEORY ONE: ANIMISMRELIGION EVOLVED FROM “PRIMITIVE” TO “SOPHISTICATED”

Page 21: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

4. Polytheistic Religions worshiping

Nature-inspired Dieties

THEORY ONE: ANIMISMRELIGION EVOLVED FROM “PRIMITIVE” TO “SOPHISTICATED”

Page 22: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

5. Development of Monotheistic Religion

THEORY ONE: ANIMISMRELIGION EVOLVED FROM “PRIMITIVE” TO “SOPHISTICATED”

Page 23: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently
Page 24: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

• Psychological Foundation For Animism:

• Human propensity to assume intention in both animate and inanimate objects for survival.

• Maybe then it is no wonder we attribute intention or “cause” to the world at large (Spirit, God, etc…)

• Strengths? Weaknesses?

THEORY ONE: ANIMISMRELIGION EVOLVED FROM “PRIMITIVE” TO “SOPHISTICATED”

Page 25: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

EMILE DURKHEIM (1858-1917) FUNCTIONALIST THEORY OF RELIGION

• BELIEFS: All religious beliefs presuppose a classification of all things, real and ideal, into two opposed groups:

• The SACRED encompasses the social community.

• The PROFANE encompasses the personal and private.

• RITUALS: Rules of conduct that prescribe how people should behave in the presence of sacred things, and that reinforce social behaviors:

• POSITIVE: The individual renews her/his commitment to the community.

• NEGATIVE: Reinforces taboos to maintain communal order.

• THUS: For Durkheim, GOD and SOCIETY are the same. How?

• Both are superior to individuals

• Individuals depend on both

• All must submit to the rules

• Strengths? Weaknesses?

THEORY #2:RELIGIONS FOR SOCIAL COHESION

Page 26: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

• The Argument:

• Many religious beliefs and traditions strengthen communities.

• The relationship between a person and a deity is very similar to the relationship between a person and their society.

• Therefore, religion must have naturally evolved within societies in order to maintain social cohesion and ensure the survival of a community.

THEORY #2:RELIGIONS FOR SOCIAL COHESION

Page 27: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

THEORY #3:

SOCIAL OPPRESSION

Karl Marx (1818-1883)

Philosopher, Sociologist

“Man makes religion, religion does not make man. Religion is the self-consciousness and self-esteem of man who has either not yet found himself or has already lost himself again…Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, just as it is the spirit of spiritless conditions. It is the opium (drug) of the people.”

What does he mean by “opium of the people?”

Page 28: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

Religion is used by the ruling class to suppress the lower classes.

“The social principles of Christianity preach the necessity of a ruling and an oppressed class, and for the latter all they have to offer is the pious wish that the former may be charitable…The social principles of Christianity declare all the vile acts of oppressors against the oppressed to be either just punishment for original sin and for other sins, or trials which the Lord, in his infinite wisdom, ordains for the redeemed.”

Strengths? Weaknesses?

THEORY #3:

SOCIAL OPPRESSION

Page 29: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

The argument:

• Religion has been used by those in power to suppress the will of those without.

• Therefore, religion was created by man as a tool of suppression.

Is this a valid argument? What is the implicit, unstated premise?

“That which is used by man was created by man.”

• Sticks have been used by those in power to suppress the will of those without.

• Therefore, sticks was created by man as a tool of suppression.

THEORY #3:

SOCIAL OPPRESSION

Page 30: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

THEORY #4: PROJECTION OF REPRESSED NEEDS (WISH FULFILLMENT)

Sigmund Freud (1856-1939)

Psychologist

• Religion originated as guilt that men feel in hating their fathers.

• Saw the ancient Greek myth of Oedipus as a pattern of human experience

Page 31: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

Sigmund Freud (1856-1939)

• Religious ideas are “illusions, fulfillments of the oldest, strongest, and most urgent wishes of mankind.” • Are all religious ideas this way, or some?

• Expression of repressed guilt towards father (think Eucharist).• What about those who never grew up with a father?

• The truly healthy and mature person is content to stand alone and face the problems of life without gods or religions.• But don’t we all stand with beliefs?

• Strengths? Weaknesses?

THEORY #4: PROJECTION OF REPRESSED NEEDS (WISH FULFILLMENT)

Page 32: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

“Almost all evidence that Freud presented has been discredited in some way or another.” (Michael Palmer)

1. The Historical and Anthropological Evidence2. Malinowski and the Oedipus Complex – Trobriands3. Narrow Selection of Evidence4. Negative bias towards religion – Winnicott (religion

helps humans adapt by offering comfort and familiarity), Rizzuto (religion no more of an illusion than science)

THEORY #4: PROJECTION OF REPRESSED NEEDS (WISH FULFILLMENT)

Page 33: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

THEORY #5:

BRAIN JUICE

Page 34: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

• Brain Juice Theory:

• We feel good when we have high levels of serotonin excreted in our brain.

• When they are low levels of serotonin, we don’t feel good.

• When people participate in religious activities there is often an elevation in serotonin levels.

• Therefore, maybe human beings developed religion as a means of elevating their levels of serotonin.

• Strengths? Weaknesses?

THEORY #5:

BRAIN JUICE

Page 35: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION - Thinking Differently

BRAIN JUICE THEORY COMPARISON

• Brain Juice Theory:• We feel good when we have

high levels of serotonin excreted in our brain.

• When they are low levels of serotonin, we don’t feel good.

• When people participate in physical activities (such as athletics, martial arts, and dance) there is often an elevation in serotonin levels.

• Therefore, maybe human beings developed physical activity as a means of elevating their levels of serotonin.

• In fact, why did we “develop” physical activity?

• Brain Juice Theory:• We feel good when we have

high levels of serotonin excreted in our brain.

• When they are low levels of serotonin, we don’t feel good.

• When people participate in religious activities there is often an elevation in serotonin levels.

• Therefore, maybe human beings developed religion as a means of elevating their levels of serotonin.