part 6 © 2006 thomson learning/south-western market power

36
Part 6 Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South- Western Market Power

Post on 22-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

Part 6Part 6

© 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western

Market Power

Page 2: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

Chapter 13Chapter 13

© 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western

Monopoly

Page 3: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

3

Causes of Monopoly

Barriers to Entry Technical Barriers to Entry

Natural Monopoly Legal Barriers to Entry

Page 4: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

4

Profit Maximization

To maximize profits, a monopoly will chose the output at which marginal revenue equals marginal costs.

The demand curve is downward-sloping so marginal revenue is less than price. To sell more, the firm must lower its price on

all units to be sold in order to generate the extra demand.

Page 5: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

5

A Graphic Treatment

A monopoly will produce an output level in which price exceeds marginal cost.

Q* is the profit maximizing output level in Figure 13-1. If a firm produced less than Q*, the loss in

revenue (MR) will exceed the reduction in costs (MC) so profits would decline.

Page 6: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

6

Price

P*

CA

E

MC

MR

AC

D

Quantityper weekQ*0

FIGURE 13-1: Profit Maximization and Price Determination in a Monopoly Market

Page 7: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

7

A Graphical Treatment

The increase in costs (MC)would exceed the gain in revenue (MR) if output exceeds Q*.

Hence, profits are maximized when MR = MC. Given output level Q*, the firm chooses P*

on the demand curve because that is what consumers are willing to pay for Q*.

The market equilibrium is P*, Q*.

Page 8: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

8

Monopoly Supply Curve

With a fixed market demand curve, the supply “curve” for a monopoly is the one point where MR = MC (point E in Figure 13-1.)

If the demand curve shifts, the marginal revenue curve will also shift and a new profit maximizing output will be chosen.

Unlike perfect competition, these output, price points do not represent a supply curve.

Page 9: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

9

Monopoly Profits

Monopoly profits are shown as the area of the rectangle P*EAC in Figure 13-1.

Profits equal (P - AC)Q*, If price exceeds average cost at Q* > 0,

profits will be positive. Since entry is prohibited, these profits can

exits in the long run.

Page 10: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

10

Monopoly Rents

Monopoly rents: profits a monopolist earns in the long run. These profits are a return to the factor that

forms the basis of the monopoly. Patent, favorable location, license, etc..

Others might be willing to pay up to the amount of this rent to operate the monopoly to obtain its profits.

Page 11: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

11

What’s Wrong with Monopoly?

Profitability Monopoly power is the ability to raise price

above marginal cost. Profits are the difference between price and

average cost. In Figure 13-2, one firm earns positive

economic profits (a) while the other (b) earns zero economic profits.

Page 12: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

12

Price

P*

AC

MC

MR MR

AC

DD

Quantityper week

Q*

(a) Monopoly with Large Profits

0

Price

P*=AC

MC AC

Quantityper week

Q*

(b) Zero-Profit Monopoly

0

FIGURE 13-2: Monopoly Profits Depend on the Relationship between the Demand and Average Cost Curves

Page 13: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

13

What’s Wrong with Monopoly

Distortion of Resource Allocation Monopolists restrict their production to

maximize profits. Since price exceeds marginal cost, consumers are

willing to pay more for extra output than it costs to produce it.

From societies point of view, output is too low as some mutually beneficial transactions are missed.

Page 14: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

14

Distortion of Resource Allocation

In this situation, a perfectly competitive industry would produce Q* where demand equals long-run supply.

A monopolist produces at Q** where marginal revenue equals marginal cost.

The restriction in output (Q* - Q**) is a measure of the harm done by a monopoly.

Page 15: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

15

Price

P**

D

AMC ( =AC)

MR

B

Quantity per week

Q**0

FIGURE 13-3: Allocational and Distributional Effects of Monopoly

Page 16: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

16

Monopolistic Distortions and Transfers of Welfare

The competitive output level (Q* in Figure 13-3) is produced at price P*. The total value to consumers is the area

DEQ*0 Consumers’ pay P*EQ*0. Consumer surplus is DEP*.

Page 17: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

17

Allocational Effects

A monopolist would product Q** at price P**. Total value to the consumer is reduced by the

area BEQ*Q**. However, the area AEQ*Q** is money freed

for consumers to spend elsewhere. The loss of consumer surplus is BEA which is

often called the deadweight loss from monopoly.

Page 18: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

18

Distributional Effects

In Figure 13-3 monopoly profits equal the area P**BAP*. This would be consumer surplus under

perfect competition. It does not necessarily represent a loss of

social welfare. This is the redistributional effects of

monopoly that may or may not be desirable.

Page 19: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

19

Price

P**

P*

D

A

E

Transferfromconsumersto firm

Value oftransferredinputs

MC ( =AC)

MR

B

Quantity per week

Q*Q**0

FIGURE 13-3: Allocational and Distributional Effects of Monopoly

Deadweight loss

Page 20: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

20

Monopolists’ Costs

Monopolists costs may be higher due to: Resources spent to achieve monopoly profits

such as ways to erect barriers to entry. Monopolists may expend resources for

lobbying or legal fees to seek special favors from the government such as restrictions on entry through licensing or favorable treatment from regulatory agencies.

Page 21: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

21

Price Discrimination

Price discrimination occurs if identical units of output are sold at different prices.

If the monopolist could sell its product at different prices to different customers, new opportunities exits as shown in Figure 13-4. Some consumer surplus still exists (area DBP**). The possibility of mutually beneficial trades exist as

represented by the area BEA.

Page 22: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

22

Price

P**

P*

D

A

E MC ( =AC)

MR

B

Quantity per weekQ*Q**0

FIGURE 13-4: Targets for Price Discrimination

Page 23: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

23

Perfect Price Discrimination

Perfect price discrimination is selling each unit of output for the highest price obtainable. The firm would sell the first unit at slightly

below 0D (Figure 13-4), the next for slightly less, and so on until the firm reaches Q*, where a lower price would result in less profit.

All consumer surplus (area P*DE) would be monopoly profit.

Page 24: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

24

Perfect Price Discrimination

Since the monopolist would produce and sell Q* units of output, which is the competitive equilibrium.

This pricing scheme requires a way to determine what each consumer would be willing to pay, and

The monopolist must be able to stop consumers from selling to each other.

Page 25: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

25

Quantity Discounts

Quantity discounts allow some sales at the monopolist’s price (P** in Figure 13-4), and sales beyond Q** at a lower price which increases profits. Examples include a second pizza for a lower

price and supermarket coupons. The monopolist must keep customers who

buy at lower prices to sell to customers at a price less than P**.

Page 26: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

26

Market Separation

If the market can be separated into two or more categories may be able to chare different prices.

Figure 13-5 shows the separation into two markets. The profit-maximizing decision is to sell Q1* in

the first market and Q2* in the second market where, in both cases, MR = MC.

Page 27: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

27

Price

P

2P

1

MCD2

D1 MR

2MR1

Quantity in market 2Quantity in market 1 Q*2

Q*1

0

FIGURE 13-5: Separated Markets Raise the Possibility of Price Discrimination

Page 28: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

28

Market Separation

The two market prices will be P1and P2 respectively. As shown in Figure 13-5, the price-

discriminating monopolist will charge a higher price in the market with the more inelastic demand.

Examples include book publishers charging higher prices in the U.S. or charging different prices for a movie in the day than at night.

Page 29: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

29

Pricing for Multiproduct Monopolies

If a firm has pricing power in markets for several related products, other strategies can be used. Firms can require users of one product to also

buy a related product such as coffee filters bought with coffee machines.

Firms can also create pricing bundles such as option packages on cars or computers.

Page 30: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

30

Marginal Cost Pricing Regulation and the Natural Monopoly Dilemma

By marginal cost pricing the deadweight loss from monopolies is minimized.

However, this would require a natural monopoly to operate at a loss. A unregulated monopoly would produce QA at

price PA in Figure 13-6, yielding a profit of PAABC.

Page 31: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

31

Marginal Cost Pricing Regulation and the Natural Monopoly Dilemma

Marginal cost pricing of PR which results in QR demanded would generate an a loss equal to the area GFEPR because PR < AC.

Either marginal cost pricing must be abandoned or the government must subsidize the monopoly.

Page 32: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

32

Price

PA

G

PR

C

H

J

A

B

MCMR

ACF

E

D Quantityper weekQA QR0

FIGURE 13-6: Price Regulation for a Natural Monopoly

Page 33: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

33

Two-Tier Pricing Systems

Under this system the monopoly is permitted to charge some users a high price and charge “marginal” users a low price.

The regulatory commission might allow the monopoly to charge PA and sell QA to one class of buyers.

Other users would pay PR and would demand QR - QA.

Page 34: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

34

Two-Tier Pricing Systems

At total output of QR average costs are 0G. Under this system, monopoly profits (area

PAAHG) balance the losses (area HFEJ). Here the “marginal user” pays marginal

cost and is subsidized by the “intramarginal” user.

Page 35: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

35

表 13.1 台電一般住戶用電價

夏月: 6 月 1 日~ 9 月 30 日。非夏月:夏月以外之時間。

產業經濟學—陳正倉、林惠玲、陳忠榮、莊春發著

Page 36: Part 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Market Power

36

表 13.2 台電工業用時間電價(低壓電力電價)

產業經濟學—陳正倉、林惠玲、陳忠榮、莊春發著