paris first talk slides

Upload: sankar-narayanan

Post on 10-Jan-2016

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

gdddfggfhjkjjhsghkjldhgsgkhkdhgkjdhsdgfjkdjg

TRANSCRIPT

  • 1Empirical Aspects of Dispersion Trading in U.S. Equity Markets

    Marco AvellanedaCourant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University

    & Gargoyle Strategic Investments

    Petit Dejeuner de la FinanceParis, Nov 27, 2002

    What is Dispersion Trading?

    Sell index option, buy options on index components (sell correlation)

    Buy index option, sell options on index components (buy correlation)

    Motivation: to profit from price differences in volatility marketsusing index options and options on individual stocks

    Opportunities: Market segmentation, temporary shifts in correlations between assets, idiosyncratic news on individual stocks

  • 2Index Arbitrage versus Dispersion Trading

    Stock 1

    Index

    Stock N

    Stock 3

    Stock 2

    *

    *

    *

    *

    Index Arbitrage:Reconstructan index product (ETF)using thecomponent stocks

    Dispersion Trading:Reconstruct an index optionusing options on the component stocks

    Main U.S. indices and sectors

    Major Indices: SPX, DJX, NDXSPY, DIA, QQQ (Exchange-Traded Funds)

    Sector Indices: Semiconductors: SMH, SOX

    Biotech: BBH, BTKPharmaceuticals: PPH, DRG

    Financials: BKX, XBD, XLF, RKHOil & Gas: XNG, XOI, OSX

    High Tech, WWW, Boxes: MSH, HHH, XBD, XCIRetail: RTH

  • 3COMS CMGI LGTO PSFTADPT CNET LVLT PMCSADCT CMCSK LLTC QLGCADLAC CPWR ERICY QCOMADBE CMVT LCOS QTRNALTR CEFT MXIM RNWKAMZN CNXT MCLD RFMDAPCC COST MEDI SANMAMGN DELL MFNX SDLIAPOL DLTR MCHP SEBLAAPL EBAY MSFT SIALAMAT DISH MOLX SSCCAMCC ERTS NTAP SPLSATHM FISV NETA SBUXATML GMST NXTL SUNWBBBY GENZ NXLK SNPSBGEN GBLX NWAC TLABBMET MLHR NOVL USAIBMCS ITWO NTLI VRSNBVSN IMNX ORCL VRTSCHIR INTC PCAR VTSSCIEN INTU PHSY VSTRCTAS JDSU SPOT WCOMCSCO JNPR PMTC XLNXCTXS KLAC PAYX YHOO

    COMS CMGI LGTO PSFTADPT CNET LVLT PMCSADCT CMCSK LLTC QLGCADLAC CPWR ERICY QCOMADBE CMVT LCOS QTRNALTR CEFT MXIM RNWKAMZN CNXT MCLD RFMDAPCC COST MEDI SANMAMGN DELL MFNX SDLIAPOL DLTR MCHP SEBLAAPL EBAY MSFT SIALAMAT DISH MOLX SSCCAMCC ERTS NTAP SPLSATHM FISV NETA SBUXATML GMST NXTL SUNWBBBY GENZ NXLK SNPSBGEN GBLX NWAC TLABBMET MLHR NOVL USAIBMCS ITWO NTLI VRSNBVSN IMNX ORCL VRTSCHIR INTC PCAR VTSSCIEN INTU PHSY VSTRCTAS JDSU SPOT WCOMCSCO JNPR PMTC XLNXCTXS KLAC PAYX YHOO

    QQQ trades as a stock

    QQQ options: largest daily traded volume in U.S.

    NASDAQ-100Index (NDX)

    and ETF (QQQ)

    Capitalization-weighted

    QQQ ~ 1/40 * NDX

    Sector Exchange Traded FundsXNG

    APAAPCBRBRREEXENEEOGEPGKMINBLNFGOEIPPPSTRWMB

    SOX

    ALTRAMATAMDINTCKLACLLTCLSCCLSIMOTMUNSMNVLSRMBSTERTXNXLNX

    XOI

    AHCBPCHVCOC.BXOMKMGOXYPREPRDSUNTXTOTUCLMRO

    ~ 20 - 40 stocksin samesector

    Weightings by:

    capitalization equal-dollar equal-stock

  • 4Index Option Arbitrage (Dispersion Trading)

    Takes advantage of differences in implied volatilities of index options and implied volatilities of individual stockoptions

    Main source of arbitrage: correlations between asset pricesvary with time due to corporate events, earnings, and ``macro shocks

    Full or partial index reconstruction

    The trade in pictures

    Index

    Stock 1 Stock 2

    Sell index call

    Buy calls on different stocks.Also, buy index/sell stocks

  • 5Profit-loss scenarios for a dispersion trade in a single day

    -2

    -1.5

    -1

    -0.5

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15stock #

    sta

    nda

    rd m

    ov

    e

    -3-2.5

    -2-1.5

    -1-0.5

    00.5

    11.5

    22.5

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15stock #

    sta

    nda

    rd m

    ov

    e

    Scenario 1 Scenario 2

    Stock P/L: - 2.30Index P/L: - 0.01Total P/L: - 2.41

    Stock P/L: +9.41Index P/L: - 0.22Total P/L: +9.18

    ( ) ( )

    ( ) ( ) ,,,,

    0,max0,max

    1

    1

    1

    TKSCwTKIC

    KSwKI

    KwK

    iii

    M

    jiI

    ii

    M

    ji

    i

    M

    ji

    =

    =

    =

    =

    First approximation to hedging:``Intrinsic Value Hedge

    '``divisor'by scaled shares, ofnumber 1

    ===

    ii

    M

    ii wSwI

    IVH:premium from indexis less than premium from components Super-replication

    Makes sense for deep--in-the-money options

    IVH: use indexweights for optionhedge

  • 6Intrinsic-Value Hedging is `exact only if stocks are perfectly correlated

    ( ) ( )

    ( )( ) ( )( ) TKTSwKTI

    eFK

    eFwKX

    NN

    eFwTSwTI

    M

    iiii

    TX

    ii

    TX

    i

    M

    ii

    iij

    TN

    i

    M

    iii

    M

    ii

    ii

    ii

    iii

    =

    =

    =

    =

    ==

    =

    =

    ==

    0,max0,max

    :Set

    :in for Solve

    normal edstandardiz 1

    1

    21

    21

    1

    21

    11

    2

    2

    2

    Similar to Jamshidian (1989)for pricing bond options in 1-factormodel

    IVH : Hedge with ``equal-delta options

    ( )

    constant tas Del constant moneyness-log

    constant N 21ln1

    21ln1

    2

    2

    21 2

    =

    =

    =

    +

    ==

    d

    dTKF

    TX

    TFK

    TXeFK

    ii

    i

    i

    ii

    i

    i

    TTX

    iiii

  • 7What happens after you enter a trade:Risk/return in hedged option trading

    !

    " # $" # %" & $" & %" ' $" ' %(") $ $" ) $ %") ) $") ) %" ) * $") * %") + $

    Unhedged call option Hedged option

    Profit-loss for a hedged single option position (Black Scholes)

    ( )

    ==

    ==

    +

    CNVtS

    Sn

    dNVnLP

    Vega normalized , (dollars),decay - time

    1/ 2

    n ~ standardized move

    Gamma P/L for an Index Option

    ( )

    ( ) ( )

    1 Index P/L

    1 Gamma P/LIndex

    22

    12

    22

    1

    2

    1

    1

    2

    ijjiji I

    jijiIi

    M

    i I

    iiI

    ijjij

    M

    ijiI

    M

    jjj

    iiii

    M

    i I

    iiI

    II

    nnpp

    np

    pp

    Sw

    Swpnpn

    n

    +=

    =

    ==

    =

    =

    =

    =

    =

    Assume 0=d

  • 8Gamma P/L for Dispersion Trade

    ( )

    ( ) ( )ijjiji I

    jijiIi

    M

    iI

    I

    iii

    ii

    nnpp

    np

    n

    +

    +

    =

    22

    12

    22

    2th

    1 P/LTrade Dispersion

    1 stock P/L i

    diagonal term:realized single-stock movements vs.implied volatilities

    off-diagonal term:realized cross-market movements vs. implied correlation

    Introducing the Dispersion Statistic

    ( )

    ( ) ( )

    +=

    ++=

    ++=

    +=

    =

    =

    ==

    =

    ===

    ==

    =

    =

    =

    22

    2

    12

    22

    2

    1

    222

    1

    222

    1

    2

    1

    2

    1

    2

    22

    1

    22

    1

    222

    2

    1

    2

    11 P/L

    ,

    Dnnp

    nnpnpn

    nn

    nn

    nnpD

    IIY

    SSXYXpD

    I

    Ii

    N

    ii

    I

    iiiI

    II

    N

    iiii

    I

    IN

    iiii

    I

    IN

    iii

    I

    N

    iiII

    N

    iii

    IIi

    N

    ii

    II

    N

    iiii

    i

    iii

    N

    ii

  • 9Summary of Gamma P/L for Dispersion Trade

    +=

    =

    22

    2

    12

    22

    Gamma P/L DnnpI

    Ii

    N

    ii

    I

    iiiI

    Idiosyncratic Gamma

    Dispersion Gamma

    Time-Decay

    Example: ``Pure long dispersion (zero idiosyncratic Gamma):

    011 2

    2

    2

    2

    2

    2

    >

    ==

    I

    iii

    II

    iii

    II

    iiIi

    ppp

    70 75 80 85 90 9510

    010

    511

    0

    115

    120

    125

    130

    70

    80

    90

    100

    110

    120

    130

    05

    101520

    25

    30

    70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 13070

    80

    90

    10 0110

    120130

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    Payoff function for a tradewith short index/long options (IVH), 2 stocks

    Value function (B&S) for the IVH position as a function ofstock prices (2 stocks)

    In general: short index IVHis short-Gamma along the diagonal, long-Gamma for``transversal moves

  • 10

    5.80

    10.31

    20.49

    70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 13070

    75

    80

    85

    90

    95

    100

    105

    110

    115

    120

    125

    130

    -6.80 +7.88

    -2.29+10.84

    Gamma Risk: Negative exposure for parallel shifts, positiveexposure to transverse shifts

    5.%40%30

    12

    2

    1

    =

    =

    =

    -0.

    15-0.

    08

    -0.

    01

    0.06

    0.13

    1.21

    0.3

    0.07

    0.01

    2 0

    -1.E+06-1.E+06-8.E+05-6.E+05-4.E+05-2.E+050.E+002.E+054.E+056.E+058.E+051.E+06

    inde

    x

    normalized dispersion

    Gamma-Risk for Baskets

    D= Dispersion, or cross-sectional move, D/(Y*Y)= Normalized Dispersion

    ( )

    ( )2

    1

    2

    2

    1

    1//

    =

    =

    =

    =

    =

    =

    N

    iii

    N

    iii

    i

    ii

    YXpYD

    YXpD

    IIY

    SSX

    From realistic portfolio

  • 11

    Vega Risk

    Sensitivity to volatility: move all single-stock implied volatilitiesby the same percentage amount

    ( ) ( )

    ( ) ( )

    ==

    +=

    +

    =

    +=

    =

    =

    =

    VNV

    NVNV

    NVNV

    I

    M

    jj

    I

    II

    j

    jM

    jj

    IIj

    M

    jj

    vega normalized

    VegaVega Vega P/L

    1

    1

    1

    Market/Volatility Risk

    70%

    80%

    90%

    100%

    110%

    120%

    130%

    7075

    80859095100105110115120

    125130

    vol % multiplier

    mar

    ket l

    ev

    el

    70% 85

    %

    100% 11

    5% 130%

    707580859095

    100

    105

    110

    115

    120

    125

    130

    0123456789

    1011121314151617181920

    Vol % multiplerMarket level

    Short Gamma on a perfectly correlated move Monotone-increasing dependence on volatility (IVH)

  • 12

    ``Rega: Sensitivity to correlation

    ( ) ( )[ ]( ) ( )

    ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )II

    II

    I

    III

    I

    II

    I

    I

    j

    M

    jjIj

    M

    jjIIII

    jijji

    iijjij

    M

    ijiI

    ijij

    NVNV

    pp

    pppp

    ji

    ==

    =

    ===

    +

    +

    ==

    =

    2

    2021

    2

    2)0(2)1(

    2

    2)0(2)1(

    2

    1

    2)0(

    1

    )1(2)0(2)1(2

    1

    2

    21

    ega R 21

    P/LnCorrelatio

    21

    , ,

    Market/Correlation Sensitivity

    -0.

    3

    -0.

    2

    -0.

    1 0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    70

    90

    110130

    00.30.60.91.21.51.82.12.42.7

    33.33.63.94.24.54.85.1

    corr change

    market level

    -0.

    3

    -0.

    2

    -0.

    1 0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.370

    7580859095100105110115120125130

    corr change

    market level

    Short Gamma on a perfectly correlated move Monotone-decreasing dependence on correlation

  • 13

    Valuation Method I: Weighted Monte Carlo

    Simulate scenarios (paths) for the group of stocks that comprisethe index or indices under consideration

    Simulate the cash-flows of options on all the stocks and theindex options

    Select weights or probabilities on the scenarios in such a waythat all options/forward prices are correctly reproduced by averaging over the paths

    Use ``weighted Monte Carlo to derive fair-value of target options and compare with market values

    Entering a trade

    time

    dtBdWdX +=

    Avellaneda, Buff, Friedman, Kruk, Grandchamp: IJTAF, 1999

  • 14

    time

    1p

    2p

    3p

    dtBdWdX +=

    Avellaneda, Buff, Friedman, Kruk, Grandchamp: IJTAF, 1999

    Computation of weights: Max-Entropy Method

    Market pricesof single-stockoptions

    Risk-neutralpricing probabilities

    cash-flow matrix

  • 15

    Example of Pricing with WMCIndex Market Vols vs. Model Vols : January 03 expiration

    0.00

    10.00

    20.00

    30.00

    40.00

    50.00

    60.00

    360 380 400 420 440 460Index Strike Price

    impl

    iedv

    ol BidVol

    AskVolModelVolRHO=1

    Another Valuation Example with WMC (From Aug 2002, front month)

    Implied vol Expiration Sep02

    05

    10152025303540

    440 445 450 455 460 465 470 475 480 485 490 495 500 505

    Index Strike

    Vol Bid

    AskModel

  • 16

    Another Valuation Example with WMC (From Aug 2002, second month)

    Implied vol Expiration Oct02

    05

    10152025303540

    430

    440

    450

    460

    470

    480

    490

    500

    510

    520

    Index Strike

    Vol Bid

    AskModel

    Another Valuation Example with WMC (From Aug 2002, third month)

    Implied vol Expiration Nov02

    05

    101520253035

    430 440 450 460 470 480 490 500 510 520 530

    Index Strike

    Vol Bid

    AskModel

  • 17

    Another Valuation Example with WMC (From Aug 2002, 4th month)

    Implied vol Expiration Dec02

    05

    101520253035

    420 440 460 470 480 490 500 510 520 530 540

    Index Strike

    Vol Bid

    AskModel

    Valuation Method II: (WKB) Steepest-Descent Approximation

    Improvement on Standard Volatility Formula for Index Options

    ijjiji

    jij

    N

    jjI ppp

    =

    += 2

    1

    22

    Assume that the correlation is given

    Use markets on single-stock volatilities taking into accountvolatility skew

    How can we integrate volatility skew information into (*)?

    (*)

    (Avellaneda, Boyer-Olson, Busca, Friz: RISK 2002, C.R.A.S. Paris 2003)

  • 18

    Approximate this conditional expectation using the mostlikely stock configuration given that

    Steepest-Descent Approximation

    ( ) ( )dttIdWtII

    dIII ,, +=

    ( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )

    ==

    = =

    N

    jk

    N

    jjjkjjkkkjjI ItSwppttSttStI

    1 1

    2,,E,

    ( )**1 ,..., NSS

    Define a risk-neutral 1-factor modelfor the index process

    Local index vol= conditional expectation of local variance (rigorous)

    ( ) ItSwi

    ii =

    ( ) ( ) ( )tStSSSpptI jjiijijNij

    iI ,,,****

    1

    2 =

    Steepest descent vs. Market vs. WMC (Aug 20, 2002, front month)

    Expiration: Sep 02

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    440

    445

    450

    455

    460

    465

    470

    475

    480

    485

    490

    495

    500

    505

    strike

    impl

    ied

    vo

    l BidVolAskVolWMC volSteepest Desc

  • 19

    Steepest descent vs. Market vs. WMC (Aug 20, 2002, 2nd month)

    Expiration: Nov 02

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    430

    440

    450

    460

    470

    480

    490

    500

    510

    520

    strike

    impl

    ied

    vo

    l BidVolAskVolW MC volSteepest Desc

    Gargoyle Dispersion Fund

    Joint venture between Gargoyle Strategic Partners andMarco Avellaneda (manager)

    Started Trading: May 2001

    Uses proprietary system to detect trades and executeselectronically and through network of brokers in 5 U.S. exchanges

    1 FT junior trader, 3 PT senior traders, 1 FT risk manager

  • 20

    May-0

    1

    Jun-

    01Ju

    l-01

    Aug-0

    1

    Sep-0

    1Oc

    t-01

    Nov-

    01

    Dec-

    01

    Jan-

    02

    Feb-0

    2

    Mar-0

    2

    Apr-

    02

    May-0

    2

    Jun-

    02Ju

    l-02

    Aug-0

    2

    Sep-0

    2Oc

    t-02

    $0.50$0.55$0.60$0.65$0.70$0.75$0.80$0.85$0.90$0.95$1.00$1.05$1.10$1.15$1.20$1.25$1.30$1.35$1.40$1.45$1.50$1.55$1.60$1.65

    GargoyleDispersionFund

    $1

    ROI May01-Oct02

    Trading History: Monthly Returns

    -1.38%10.10%

    -7.56%1.82%

    3.58%9.18%

    13.97%3.78%

    0.49%6.09%

    -1.02%3.27%

    -2.04%5.20%

    -8.49%-16.17%

    -3.17%12.54%

    0.67%-2.43%

    -0.98%-6.26%

    -8.07%1.90%

    7.67%0.88%

    -1.46%-1.93%

    3.76%-6.06%

    -0.74%-7.12%

    -7.79%0.66%

    -10.87%8.80%

    -20% -15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20%

    M a y- 0 1

    J u n - 0 1

    J u l- 0 1

    A u g - 0 1

    S e p - 0 1

    O c t - 0 1

    N o v- 0 1

    D e c - 0 1

    Ja n - 0 2

    F e b - 0 2

    M a r - 0 2

    A p r - 0 2

    M a y - 0 2

    Ju n - 0 2

    J u l- 0 2

    Au g - 0 2

    S e p - 0 2

    O c t - 0 2

    S&P 500

    GargoyleDispersion Fund

  • 21

    Dispersion Fund PerformanceTrading Period: 15 months

    Cumulative ROI* since inception: 28.33%

    Annualized Rate of Return: 22.65%

    Annualized Standard Deviation: 26.59%

    Worst monthly loss: August 02, -16%

    Correlation with S&P 500: 35%

    Correlation with VIX Index: - 33%

    * After paying brokerage fees and commissions, etc

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov

    Average CorrWeighted Corr

    Dow IndustrialAverage (DJX)

    Volatility

    Correlation

  • 22

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    Dec Ja n Fe b Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Se p Oct Nov

    Average Corr

    Weighted Corr

    Volatility

    Correlation

    Amex Biotech-nology Index (BTK)

    DJX expiration 9/ 21/ 2002 strike 86

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    7/11/2

    002

    7/13/2

    002

    7/15/2

    002

    7/17/2

    002

    7/19/2

    002

    7/21/2

    002

    7/23/2

    002

    7/25/2

    002

    7/27/2

    002

    7/29/2

    002

    7/31/2

    002

    8/2/20

    02

    8/4/20

    02

    8/6/20

    02

    8/8/20

    02

    8/10/2

    002

    8/12/2

    002

    8/14/2

    002

    8/16/2

    002

    8/18/2

    002

    8/20/2

    002

    8/22/2

    002

    8/24/2

    002

    8/26/2

    002

    8/28/2

    002

    8/30/2

    002

    Corr

    ela

    tion

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    Delta

    ImpliedCorrBidRhoAskRhoDelta

    DJX Correlation Blowout, July 2002

    DJX Sep 86 Call

  • 23

    Conclusions Dispersion trading: a form of ``statistical correlation arbitrage

    Sell correlation by selling index options and buying optionson the components

    Buy correlation by buying index options and selling optionson the components

    ``Convergence trading style.

    Price discovery using model and market data on vol skews

    Sophisticated trading strategy. Potentially very profitable, with moderate (but not low) risk profile.