pac services · 2015-04-17 · bet surface area • carbon ... the less efficient chemicals are...

1
PAC Services PAC services EPS provides: PAC profiling and performance based tesng Dose removal curves for target contaminants of interest (e.g., MIB, Geosmin, TOC ) Pore volume Pore size distribuon BET surface area Carbon specificaons: Iodine number Phenol value Tannin value What is performance based tesng? EPS will develop mul-point dose removal curves using several PACs for a contaminant of concern. This data allows clients to choose the opmum PAC for their applicaon based on price and performance as well as predict doses needed to meet treatment objecves. As the figures below demonstrate, excessive amounts of money can be spent on treatment chemicals that were chosen based on price, without considering performance. PAC Dose Removal Curve Which carbon is best for your applicaon? Performance Factor Example PAC Dose (mg/L) Required to Achieve 60% MIB Removal 1 Performance Factor $/Ton Adjusted $/Ton A 25 1.1 1300 1430 B 22 1.0 1360 1360 C 37 1.7 1450 2465 D 50 2.3 1160 2668 1 60 percent MIB removal was chosen for demonstraon purposes only A Performance Factor gives a “weighted ranking” for the treatment chemical being tested. The opmal chemical is scored as a 1.0, and the less efficient chemicals are scored in relaonship to the best performer (always receiving a higher factor). Mulplying the Performance Factor by the treatment chemical cost provides a weighted cost that incorporates both performance and economics. Without performance factors, ulies might purchase Carbon D at $1160/ton, which appears to be a value, but because of its poor performance, actually costs much more ($2668/ton) to achieve the same results as Carbon B at $1360/ton. That’s almost half the cost! EPS believes that performance-based tesng is the opmum method for determining which acvated carbon is best for the parcular applicaon. Therefore, EPS performs all performance-based tests with the customer’s carbons and water in order to best mimic the condions of the full-scale facility. Proper performance-based tesng can alleviate overspending on treatment chemicals and help ensure all treatment goals are met.

Upload: others

Post on 03-Aug-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PAC Services · 2015-04-17 · BET surface area • Carbon ... the less efficient chemicals are scored in relationshpi to the best performer (always receiving a higher factor)

PAC Services PAC services EPS provides:

• PAC profiling

and

performance

based

testing

• Dose removal

curves

for

target

contaminants

of

interest (e.g.,

MIB,

Geosmin,

TOC

)

Pore

volume

Pore

size

distribution

BET

surface

area

• Carbon

specifications:

Iodine

number

Phenol

value

••

Tannin

value

What is performance based testing? EPS will develop multi-point dose removal curves using several PACs for a contaminant of concern. This data allows clients to choose the optimum PAC for their application based on price and performance as well as predict doses needed to meet treatment objectives. As the figures below demonstrate, excessive amounts of money can be spent on treatment chemicals that were chosen based on price, without considering performance.

PAC Dose Removal Curve

Which carbon is best for your application?

Performance Factor Example PAC Dose (mg/L) Required to Achieve

60% MIB Removal1Performance Factor

$/Ton

Adjusted $/Ton

A 25 1.1 1300 1430 B 22 1.0 1360 1360 C 37 1.7 1450 2465 D 50 2.3 1160 2668

160 percent MIB removal was chosen for demonstration purposes only A Performance Factor gives a “weighted ranking” for the treatment chemical being tested. The optimal chemical is scored as a 1.0, and the less efficient chemicals are scored in relationship to the best performer (always receiving a higher factor). Multiplying the Performance Factor by the treatment chemical cost provides a weighted cost that incorporates both performance and economics. Without performance factors, utilities might purchase Carbon D at $1160/ton, which appears to be a value, but because of its poor performance, actually costs much more ($2668/ton) to achieve the same results as Carbon B at $1360/ton. That’s almost half the cost!

EPS believes that performance-based testing is the optimum method for determining which activated carbon is best for the particular application. Therefore, EPS performs all performance-based tests with the customer’s carbons and water in order to best mimic the conditions of the full-scale facility. Proper performance-based testing can alleviate overspending on treatment chemicals and help ensure all treatment goals are met.