overview of fema p-58 and sp3 software

18
1 The FEMA P-58 Methodology and the Seismic Performance Prediction Program (SP3) Curt Haselton and Jack Baker

Upload: rigasch

Post on 14-Jul-2016

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Overview of FEMA P-58 and SP3 Software

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Overview of FEMA P-58 and SP3 Software

1

The FEMA P-58 Methodologyand the

Seismic Performance Prediction Program (SP3)

Curt Haselton and Jack Baker

Page 2: Overview of FEMA P-58 and SP3 Software

2

© HB Risk Group

Overview of FEMA P-58

P-58 is a performance prediction methodology based on a 10-year

FEMA study (enabled by much previous research).

P-58 is an alternative to experience-based or judgment-based

methods (e.g. proprietary software, HAZUS, ATC-13, etc.).

P-58 is tailored to building-specific analysis (cause + effect).

ATC is currently working on another 5-year effort to further

advance the methodology, implementation, ease of use.

The U.S. Resiliency Council is currently creating

a P-58-based rating system.

FEMA P-58 Output Results:

• Losses [$]

• Fatalities & injuries

• Repair time & red tagging

Page 3: Overview of FEMA P-58 and SP3 Software

3

© HB Risk Group

FEMA P-58: Methodology

Hazard and Ground Motions

• Soil and hazard curve

• Ground motions (if needed)

Page 4: Overview of FEMA P-58 and SP3 Software

4

© HB Risk Group

FEMA P-58: Methodology

Hazard and Ground Motions

• Soil and hazard curve

• Ground motions (if needed)

Structural Responses

• Option #1: Response-history

• Option #2: Simplified method

Page 5: Overview of FEMA P-58 and SP3 Software

5

© HB Risk Group

FEMA P-58: Methodology

Hazard and Ground Motions

• Soil and hazard curve

• Ground motions (if needed)

Structural Responses

• Option #1: Response-history

• Option #2: Simplified method

Damage Prediction

• Contents (str. and non-str.)

• Fragility curves

Page 6: Overview of FEMA P-58 and SP3 Software

6

© HB Risk Group

FEMA P-58: Methodology

Hazard and Ground Motions

• Soil and hazard curve

• Ground motions (if needed)

Structural Responses

• Option #1: Response-history

• Option #2: Simplified method

Damage Prediction

• Contents (str. and non-str.)

• Fragility curves

Loss Estimation (loss curves)

and other consequences

Page 7: Overview of FEMA P-58 and SP3 Software

7

© HB Risk Group

FEMA P-58: Methodology

Hazard and Ground Motions

• Soil and hazard curve

• Ground motions (if needed)

Structural Responses

• Option #1: Response-history

• Option #2: Simplified method

Damage Prediction

• Contents (str. and non-str.)

• Fragility curves

Loss Estimation (loss curves)

and other consequences

Monte Carlo

Simulation used

(“roll dice” thousands of

times).

Each “dice roll” gives a

single observation of

losses and other

consequences.

Full set of “dice rolls”

provides solid statistical

information on

performance

(e.g. 10,000 at 12 levels =

120,000 runs).

Page 8: Overview of FEMA P-58 and SP3 Software

8

© HB Risk Group

FEMA P-58: Output Example

Sample Results (12-story RC frame):

Page 9: Overview of FEMA P-58 and SP3 Software

9

© HB Risk Group

FEMA P-58 Benefits

Objective process based on data and research.

Quantitative performance information:

• Solid statistical basis.

• Sensitive enough to inform design decisions (cause + effect).

• Tools to communicate with owners.

• Dig as deep as you like.

Page 10: Overview of FEMA P-58 and SP3 Software

10

© HB Risk Group

FEMA P-58: Perceived “Difficulty”

Hazard and Ground Motions

• Soil and hazard curve

• Ground motions (if needed)

Structural Responses

• Option #1: Response-history

• Option #2: Simplified method

Damage Prediction

• Contents (str. and non-str.)

• Fragility curves

Loss Estimation (loss curves)

and other consequences

I need to hire a geotech to do

this…?!?!

I need to do a response-

history analysis…?!?!

I need to count and enter every foot of partition wall and

other contents…?!?!

Page 11: Overview of FEMA P-58 and SP3 Software

11

© HB Risk Group

FEMA P-58: Perceived “Difficulty”

The fact is that it may not be as hard to implement FEMA P-58

as some currently perceive it to be.

WHAT IF….???

What if design engineers could provide high performance

earthquake simulation predictions to their clients using the P-58

methodology in a matter of hours rather than days?

Page 12: Overview of FEMA P-58 and SP3 Software

12

© HB Risk Group

The Need

We have seen that a large barrier to widespread FEMA P-58

adoption is related to software and ease-of-use (high cost of

entry).

ATC/FEMA have created a great methodology but are not in

the business of maintaining software.

Need: For our profession to move forward with FEMA P-58

methods, an enabling commercial software needs to be

created and maintained.

Page 13: Overview of FEMA P-58 and SP3 Software

13

© HB Risk Group

SP3 Version 2.0 – Released June 2015

Page 14: Overview of FEMA P-58 and SP3 Software

14

© HB Risk Group

Overview of SP3 Implementation

Hazard and Ground Motions

• Soil and hazard curve

• Ground motions (if needed)

Structural Responses

• Option #1: Response-history

• Option #2: Simplified method

Damage Prediction

• Contents (str. and non-str.)

• Fragility curves

Loss Estimation (loss curves)

Soil and hazard curves embedded.

Simplified method embedded.

Structural and non-structural contents estimates and pre-

populated.

Two-level structure: (1) Simple (prelim. design, building rating, PML)(2) Refine and go as deep as you like (full new PBD).

Streamlined numerics, scalable web deployment.

Page 15: Overview of FEMA P-58 and SP3 Software

15

© HB Risk Group

SP3 Version 2.0

Page 16: Overview of FEMA P-58 and SP3 Software

16

© HB Risk Group

SP3 Version 2.0 Features

SP3 Features:

Method: FEMA P-58 damage and loss methodology implementation.

Automation: Automated look-up of soil and hazard data based on project address.

Automation: Integrated & simplified structural analysis method, providing near-

instant predictions of structural response.

Automation: Pre-populated non-structural building contents using SP3 pre-

population algorithm (no need to manually input building contents).

Flexibility: The ability to define and input any demand parameter or component the

user can create makes SP3 a powerful modeler.

Diversity: SP3 uses other methodologies, like FEMA 154, REDi, and the USRC rating

system, along with P-58 to enhance seismic predictions.

Efficiency Improved numerical methods enabling hundreds of thousands of damage

simulations in minutes.

Efficiency Software that runs in the cloud for fast computation and infinite

scalability.

Results Access Reporting tools, enabling users to quickly identify building features

leading to earthquake damage.

Page 17: Overview of FEMA P-58 and SP3 Software

17

© HB Risk Group

Feedback Welcomed

Our purpose in creating SP3 is to support adoption of FEMA

P-58 methods, so please let us know how we can best help in

this process.

We are still in active development, so please:

• Let us know how we can tailor our plans to most

effectively serve the engineering profession.

• Give us any other feedback/ideas (we are all ears!).

E-mail: [email protected]

Office: (530) 531-0295

Websites: www.hbrisk.com

Page 18: Overview of FEMA P-58 and SP3 Software

18

© HB Risk Group