minutes attached - indian river county fl€¦ · minutes attached board of coun i v ......

MINUTES ATTACHED

BOARD OF COUN I V COMMISSIONERS INDIAN COUN j V, FLORIDA

AGENDA TUESDAY, MAY 21, 2002 - 9:00 A.M.

County Commission Chamber County Administration Building

1840 25 th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960

COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Ruth M. Stanbridge, Chairman John W. Tippin, Vice Chairman Fran B. Adams Caroline D. Ginn Kenneth R. Macht

District 2 District 4 District 1 District 5 District 3

James E. Chandler, County Administrator Paul G. BaI}gel, County Attorney

Kimberly Massung, Executive Aide to BCC Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board

9:00 a.m. 1.

2.

3.

4.

CALL TO ORDER

INVOCATION Stan Boling

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE James E. Chandler

ADDITIONSIDELETIONS TO THE AGENDA / EMERGENCY ITEMS

1. Additional Backup for Item 10. 2. Additional Backup for Item 11.1.

5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS •

Presentation of Proclamation Designating the month of May, 2002

BACKUP

PAGES

as Mental Health Month 1

6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Regular Meeting of May 7, 2002

7.

. , .". "

CONSENT AGENDA A. Approval of Warrants

(memorandum dated May 10, 2002)

rHl It Dr\ •

2-14

r: ....'.: ') 0 ,.r i , r t 1 • ~ , ; v .,.,,1 .....

, ',' --. - ; , " :',;' .'>

. . , ,,-~',,-;

" , . ", ' ,- " , '_.'-< '

. .

\ ,'-

.

-, "

7.

8.

9.

I .., '" 'i ,.l -1"1 CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd.): (~:) JiJ (, (. I ~8 B. GHA River Village, Inc.' s Request for Final Plat

Approval for River Village - Grand Harbor Plat 26 (Quasi-Judicial)

C.

D.

E.

F.

G.

H.

(memorandulI1 dated May 13, 2002)

Kennedy Groves, Inc. Request for Final Plat Approval for Old Orchid Phase III Subdivision - (Quasi-Judicial) (memorandum dated May 14,2002)

IRC Bid #4060 Portable Trailer Mounted Generator (memorandum dated May 8, 2002)

Proclamation Honoring Ma J aya Sati Bhagavati

Fiscal Year 200212003 Anti Drug Abuse Grant Funding (memorandum dated May 14, 2002)

Jungle TraillPelican Island Wildlife Refuge - Revised Change Order No. 1 for Summit Construction Mgmt., Inc. (memorandum dated May 13, 2002)

Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 012 (memorandum dated May 13, 2002) .

CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES None

PUBLIC ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARINGS

1. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLOR II )A, AMENDING 'IE E ZONING ORDINANCE AND TH E ACCOl\1P G ZONING MAP FOR 13.94 ACRES, LOCATED ON'IBE NORTH SIDE OF 26 th STREET, APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET WEST OF 66 th AVENUE, FROM A-I, AGRICUL DISTRICT (UP TO 1 UNIT/S ACRES) TO RM-6, MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 6 UNITS/ACRE); AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVII )ING SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE Adamson request to rezone ±13.94 acres from A-I to RM-6 (Quasi-Judicial) (memorandum dated May 13,2002)

BACKUP

PAGES

15-35

36-53

54-69

70

71-72

73-75

76-79

80-96

" ;;':',:<> , " "-'

; - , .-.- ,<.', - ,- -

". " , '. '.-.'.-,

'\- -',' '",

, ,-i. -

- ' ,:. -;".:,:':

,- -, .(.:'-,",

: ... ,i, '.>. -, ~'/,'" ,',

" '-<i:;~-,

<- -,' - -,': - ':,.' ;:,

, ' '-,-

, ' . , .

9. PUBLIC ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARINGS (cont'd.):

2. Public Hearing to Consider Revenue Distribution Formula for 6¢ Local Option Gas Tax (memorandum dated May 13,2002)

B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS None

C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS Scheduled for Public Hearing June 4, 2002: Anthony J. Sciaccotta's request for an abandonment of a portion of 84th Terrace right-of-way south of 22nd St. within Paradise Park (Legislative) (memorandum dated May 14, 2002)

10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS Extension of Local Option Sales Tax

11.

FY 2004/05 through FY 2019120 (memorandum dated May 15, 2002) (backup under separate cover)

DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS A. Community Development

None

B. Emergency Services None

c. General Services 1. Rental Fees for Use of Various Meeting Rooms at

County Library Facilities

2.

(memorandum dated May 14,2002)

Roofing Design Services (memorandum dated May 14, 2002)

3. Change Order for Modular Office for Supervisor of Elections (memorandum dated May 15,2002)

D. Leisure Services None

R II I') " U" "..;' 1\ I l.. 1_

BACKUP

PAGES

97-100

101

102-107

108-109

110-113

11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd.): E. Office of Management and Budget

1. Munis Software Agreement (memorandum dated May 15,2002)

•

F. Human Resources (formerly Personnel) None

G.

H.

Public Works 1. Jungle TraiIlPelican Island Wildlife Refuge

Public Improvements - Request for Release of Retainage (memorandum dated May 99, 2002)

Utilities 1. Department of Utility Services 452.200 MHz -

UHF Wastewater Radio Telemetry Frequency (memorandum dated May 10, 2002)

I. Human Services Contract for Needs Assessment Consultant for Children's Services Advisory Committee (memorandum dated May 15,2002)

12. COUNTY ATTORNEY

.. 13.

,

None

COMMISSIONERS ITEMS A. Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge

Updates

B. Vice Chairman John W. Tippin

C. Commissioner Fran B. Adams

D. Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn

E. Commissioner Kenneth R Macht

O!! ! 01\ i

r) '""'1 ,"'""-_ .-..... r ' -' j .t-.-: rJ IJ ____ L.... t j

BACKUP

PAGES

114-117

118-120

121-124

125-137

14. SPECIAL DISTRICTSIBOARDS

14.

A. Emergency Services District None

SPECIAL DISTRICTSIBOARDS (cont'.): B. Solid Waste Disposal District

1. Approval of Minutes - meeting of 517102

2. IRC Bid #4059 Closed, high top, roll-off recycling containers (memorandum dated May 8, 2002)

C. Environmental Control Board None

15. ADJOURNMENT

BACKUP

PAGES

138-151

Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal will be based.

Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 567-8000 x1223 at least 48 hours in advance of meeting.

Indian River County WebSite: http://bcc1.co.indian-river.fl.us

Full agenda back-up material is available for review in the Board of County Commission Office, Indian River County Main Library, IRC Courthouse Law Library, and North County Library

Meeting may be broadcast live on AT & T Cable Channel 13 - rebroadcast continuously Thursday 1 :00 p.m. until Friday morning and Saturday 12:00 noon untit5:00 p.m. Meetin broadcast same as above on AT & T Broadband, Channel 27 in Sebastian.

rw ! ,) ,) t1j'\ ' ' .' u ~ L... : ___

r r"t; /- I) I '1-' ILJ ' ~, I

, l. ...' , .. ,-..' ,...... .

, ,

INDEX TO MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING

OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

MAY 21, 2002

1. CALL TO ORDER ............................................... -1-

2. INVOCATION ................................................ " -1-

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ...................................... -1-

4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS '" -2-

5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. -2-

Proclamation Designating the Month of May, 2002 as Mental Health Month . -2-

6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MAY 7, 2002 .......................... -4-

7. CONSENT AGENDA ............................................ -4-

7.A. List of Warrants ............................................ -4-

7.B. GHA River Village, Inc. - Final Plat Approval for River Village - Grand

Harbor Plat 26 (Quasi-Judicial) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. -13-

7.C. Kennedy Groves, Inc. - Final Plat Approval for Old Orchid Phase III

Subdivision (Quasi-Judicial) ................................ -15-

MAY 21,2002 ;-. .-. ,....t"') f-1_'1 r .e....... '.-- i' ~'I" • u :....,; __ \,.7

-1-

, '- -';," ',:', , .. --"" - -, . ,-,',

~" ,"' ,~~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ •• ~.~ ~ ~ .... ~,.~ •• ~~ •• ~~.~ •• ~ •. ~~.< ~ ~ ~i ~ ~

, ,,',' ". ':

., , ,

<'i'·· .... '. . ... ',' ......• . '.:. •• ......: •• >. :. .• .... .......\ ... ...•. .·..:i·;·. >' ••.•. .,;; ;f.~... .~,....\.).~., •... i·· ;:: -.••••• ;;: •.

7.D. Bid #4060 - Portable Trailer Mounted Generator (Utilities) - Alternative

Power Sources, LLC ....................................... -17-

7.E. Proclamation Honoring Ma J aya Sati Bhagavati ................. -19-

7.F. Anti-Drug Abuse Grant Funding - Fiscal Year 2002-03 - Florida

Department of Law Enforcement - Multi-Agency Drug Enforcement Unit

(MACE) - PREVENT (Substance Abuse Council) - Substance Abuse

Council ................................................. -21-

7.G. Jungle Trail/Pelican Island Wildlife Refuge - Revised Change Order # 1 _

Summit Construction Management, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. -23-

7.H. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment #012 ....................... -24-

9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE 2002-020 AMENDING THE ZONING

ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR 13.94

ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 26TH STREET

APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET WEST OF 66TH AVENUE FROM A-I TO RM-6

(JAMES AND LORA ADAMSON) (Quasi-judicial) .................. -27-

9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - REVENUE DISTRIBUTION FORMULA FOR 6¢

LOCAL OPTION GAS TAX PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 209 OF THE

INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CODE ................................ -39-

9.C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC HEARING JUNE 4,

2002 - ANTHONY 1. SCIACCOTT A - REQUEST FOR ABANDONMENT OF

A PORTION OF 84TH TERRACE RIGHT-OF-WA Y SOUTH OF 22ND STREET

WITHIN PARADISE PARK (Legislative) ........................... -43-

MAY 21,2002

-2-

" ,'.:':: .' , '. .,,', " ", . '," ",,; , .. ",':', ';-,," "'.' "'.". '

, ".,;",;,~, .. ",c

'. ,_, .. ' ':~"" "', . '."", , ,,-::', :"',:,,, ,'i:',':;'::':-,', "'" '"'' ",~,;, " "",' "',""','",,', ".,'" "":':"."--' ", "',-."',:.' '. ", ". ' :,', '

'. ,.' . . '

, , --", '"" .,' - -

, '-' , , ".-,_, ;'-::':'< \;<_;-r:-,~:;_{,L,.:>;J";,\;,,,/0.(/~-·,·;;,,,,-"- " - -,', ""':'_:_""'>~"::>"",',> .. ,':'_":

1 O. EXTENSION OF 1 ¢ LOCAL OPTION SALES TAX FY 2004/05

I1.C.1.

II.C.2.

I1.C.3.

I1.E.1.

I1.G.1.

I1.H.1.

•

THROUGH FY 2019/20 .................................. " -45-

COUNTY LIBRARY FACILITIES - RENTAL FEES FOR USE OF

VARIOUS MEETING ROOMS ............................. -53-

HEALTH DEPARTMENT AND JAIL ROOFING DESIGN SERVICES

RESCIND R. L. REEGER CONTRACT - APPROVE EDLUND

DRITENBAS CONTRACT ................................. -56-

SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS - MODULAR OFFICE - CHANGE

ORDER - G. E. CAPITAL MODULAR SPACE ................. -58-

MUNIS SOFTWARE AGREEMENT ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. -60-

JUNGLE TRAIL/PELICAN ISLAND WILDLIFE REFUGE - PUBLIC

IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT 9724 - BRAD SMITH ASSOCIATES,

INC. REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF RETAINAGE ............. -64-

UTILITY SERVICES 452.200 MHZ UHF WASTEWATER RADIO

TELEMETRY FREQUENCY - DATA FLOW SYSTEMS, INC. RADIO

TELEMETRY UNITS (RTUs) - TELECOM NETWORK, INC. . . .. -66-

MAY 21, 2002 Bll ! ,}.)

• C,'? ~ ), ~ 4_ ~._.

-3-

, ,;' -

11.1. CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE - NEEDS

ASSESSMENT CONSULTANT - PUBLIC SOLUTIONS, LLC (ROBIN ,

S. CLEMENTS) .......................................... -68-

13.A. CHAIRMAN RUTH M. STANBRIDGE - UPDATES ............ -69-

I4.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT ........................ -69-

I4.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. -69-

I4.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. -69-

. .

MAY 21, 2002

-4-nD, 'K ! ");) Dr

\ Lr: .. iiJ

May 21,2002

REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY

COMMISSIONERS

The Board of County Commissioners ofIndian River County, Florida, met in Regular

Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25 th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on

Tuesday, May 21,2002, at 9:00 a.m. Present were Ruth M. Stanbridge, Chairman; John W.

Tippin, Vice Chairman; Fran B. Adams; Caroline D. Ginn; and Kenneth R. Macht. Also

present were James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney;

and Patricia "PJ" Jones, Deputy Clerk.

1. CALL TO ORDER

Chairman Stanbridge called the meeting to order.

2. INVOCATION

Planning Director Stan Boling delivered the Invocation.

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

County Administrator Jim Chandler led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.

MAY 21, 2002 ,".: I _.j~ ... ) RI/ I t"! ') I'" . ,- 0 U I \ I c. i _ (}) L J

-1-

4. ADDITIONSIDELETIONS TO THE AGENDAIEMERGENCY

ITEMS

Chairman Stanbridge requested the following changes to today's Agenda:

1. Additional backup for Item 10.

2. Additional backup for Item 11.1.

ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,

SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board

unanimously made the above changes to the

Agenda.

5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS

PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING THE MONTH OF MAY, 2002 AS MENTAL

HEALTH MONTH

The Chairman presented the following Proclamation to Margi Silberman of New

Horizons of the Treasure Coast and to Kristine Sarkauskas, President and Chief Executive

Officer of the Mental Health Association, who both expressed their thanks for the

recognition:

DESIGNATING THE MONTH OF MAY, 2002, AS MENTAL HEALTH MONTH

WHEREAS, mental health problems do not discriminate; they know no race, creed, age limit or economic status; and

WHEREAS, one in five American adults and children are affected by a mental illness, however people with mental illness can recover and lead full productive lives; and

MAY 21, 2002

-2-R" I F) ') f\--uf\ 1 (" ,- 1 i_C. I L

WHEREAS, over 92,000 adults with serious and persistent mental Illnesses and over 79,000 children with serious emotional disturbances have no access to mental health treatment in Florida; and

. .

WHEREAS, untreated or under-treated mental illness costs public and private employers billions of dollars annually through absenteeism, turnover, low productivity and increased medical costs; and

WHEREAS, nearly 25% of Florida's jail inmates have a serious mental illness and local jails have become the largest public psychiatric hospitals, housing over 10,000 offenders with mental illnesses, many of whom are low level offenders; and

WHEREAS, the month of May has been designated National Mental Health Month, with more than 340 Mental Health Associations nationwide undertaking public awareness,education and fundraising initiatives; and

WHEREAS, New Horizons of the Treasure Coast provides comprehensive mental health and . .

sUbstance abuse services to over 2,500 Indian River County residents each year, regardless of their ability to pay. . .

• NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT· PROCLAIMED BY. THE . BOARD OF· COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the month of May, 2002, be designated

. -as

MENTAL HEALTH MONTH

in Indian River County.

Adopted this 21 st day of May, 2002.

\ - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA

•

Ruth M. Stan bridge, Cha n

Margi Silberman announced that New Horizons is sponsoring a program tomorrow

night at their Midway Road Campus, called "All Stressed Up With No Place To Go". She

invited the public to attend.

MAY 21,2002 BK

-3-

6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MAY 7, 2002

The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the

Regular Meeting of May 7, 2002. There were none.

ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED

by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously

approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of

May 7,2002, as written.

7. CONSENT AGENDA

Commissioner Ginn requested that Item 7.E. be separated for discussion.

7.A. LIST OF WARRANTS

The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 10,2002:

TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

DATE: May 10, 2002

SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS

FROM: EDWIN M. FRY., FINANCE DIRECTOR

In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.

Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for the time period of May 03, 2002 to May 09,2002.

MAY 21, 2002

-4-Ql! I ul\ l


SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board

unanimously approved the list of Warrants as issued

by the Clerk to the Board for May 3-9, 2002, as

recommended by staff.

cse:ex NUMBER

NAME CHECK DATE

0021729 KOMARNICKI, WALTER SR 2002-05-03 0021730 MCGRIFF, BARBARA R 2002-05-03 0021731 UNUMPROVIDENT INSURANCE 2002-05-06 0021732 HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE 2002-05-06 0021733 BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF 2002-05-06 0021734 ALDEN RISK MANAGEMENT 2002-05-06 0021735 UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC 2002-05-06 0021736 IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE- 2002-05-06 0021737 HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE 2002-05-06 0021738 AETNA LIFE INSURANCE AND 2002-05-06 0021739 IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE- 2002-05-06 0021740 KRUCZKIEWICZ, LORIANE 2002-05-08 0021741 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 2002-05-08 0021742 BUREAU FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFOR 2002-05-08 0021743 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 2002-05-08 0021744 IRS - ACS 2002-05-08 0021745 CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE 2002-05-08 0021746 VERO BEACH FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC. 2002-05-08 0021747 INDIAN RIVER FEDERAL CREDIT 2002-05-08 0021748 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT 2002-05-08 0021749 NACO/SOUTHEAST 2002-05-08 0021750 SALEM TRUST COMPANY 2002-05-08 0021751 SAN DIEGO COUNTY OFFICE OF THE 2002-05-08 0021752 FL SDU 2002-05-08 0322840 A A FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC 2002-05-09 0322841 ACTION TRANSMISSION AND 2002-05-09 0322842 ADRON FENCE COMPANY 2002-05-09 0322843 AERO PRODUCTS CORPORATION 2002-05-09 0322844 ALPHA ACE HARDWARE 2002-05-09 0322845 ACTION ANSWERING SERVICE 2002-05-09 0322846 APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO 2002-05-09 0322847 APPLE MACHINE & SUPPLY co 2002-05-09 0322848 AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH, 2002-05-09 0322849 ADAMSON, RONAT,D 2002-05-09 0322850 ABS PUMPS, INC 2002-05-09 0322851 ADDISON OIL CO 2002-05-09 0322852 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 2002-05-09 0322853 A T & T 2002-05-09 0322854 ASHWORTH INC 2002-05-09 0322855 ALL INDIAN RIVER FENCE CO 2002-05-09 0322856 ASHBROOK CORPORATION 2002-05-09 0322857 ARROW MAGNOLIA INTERNATIONAL 2002-05-09 0322858 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 2002-05-09

cae:CK AMOUNT

120.00 465.00

3,962.64 4,216.30 4,716.11 2,312.22

567.82 11,937.35

264.60 1,'·125.89

35,362.50 138.50 115.38 37.75 50.00 50.00

639.86 2,500.00

81,166.33 193.86

9,990.77 207.40 132.46

7,997.34 301. 75 745.00 50.00

1,323.36 44.90

328.50 446.26 97.00

403.50 530.63

3,609.81 352.48 15.50

102.85 230.37

70.00 887.36 564.76

5,585.32

MAY 21, 2002 r-:; l' Gil , " j , "-".

• ? , , ,/ J-."'l _1\ -

-,

• i..-.. ! 0...-" • --5-

• n '? .' -" '. ,

d ',,,I ..... '

0322859 0322860 0322861

0322862 0322863 0322864 0322865 0322866 0322867 0322868 0322869 0322870 0322871 0322872 0322873 0322874 0322875 0322876 0322877 0322878 0322879 0322880 0322881 0322882 0322883 0322884 0322885 0322886 0322887 0322888 0322889 0322890 0322891 0322892 0322893 0322894 0322895 0322896 0322897 0322898 0322899 0322900 0322901 0322902 0322903 0322904 0322905 0322906 0322907

0322908 0322909 0322910 0322911 0322912 0322913 0322914 0322915 0322916 0322917 0322918 0322919 0322920

ABCO GARAGE DOOR CO A T & T APOLLO ENTERPRISES

AMERITREND HOMES ACTION WET.DING SUPPLY INC ATLANTIC PSYCHIATRIC CENTER ALDEN RISK MANAGEMENT AARP INSURANCE PLAN ADAM'S MARK HOTEL ASSOCIATES IN PSYCHIATRY ARMY/NAVY OUTDOORS AT&T BROADBAND AMERICAN ENGINEERING SERVICES AUTO SUPPLY CO WEST ANDERSON, TIMOTHY ALI, MD SABRI ALARM PARTNERS BARNEY'S PUMPS BARTH CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BEN SONS LOCK SERVICE BARTON, JEFFREY K- CLERK BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK BRIDGESTONE SPORTS, INC BURGOON BERGER BAKER & TAYLOR INC BLACKBURN, GERALDINE BRODART CO BRYANT, BILL & ASSOCIATES BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT BOYNTON PUMP & IRRIGATION BELL, AMBER BESANCON, MARK BARIl.T.A, JAMES BOOKS ON TAPE INC BELLSOUTH BEAZER HOMES, INC BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF BRADFORD, MADGE A BELLSOUTH PUBLIC COMMUNICATION BLACK DIAMOND

,

BUZA, PAUL W DO BREVARD ORTHHOPAEDIC CLINIC BRACKETT, PARKER & ASSOCIATES BLACKBURN, THOMAS BIOMASS PROCESSING BAT'rERY ZONE BROWNING, CARLEAN BLUE SHIEI·D FLORIDA

BREWER, BURVIN BRODNER, MD ROBERT A BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF BELLSOUTH CAMERON & BARKLEY CO CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC CAREER TRACK SEMINARS CHANDLER EQUIPMENT CO, INC CLASSIC AWARDS COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC CROOM CONSTRUCTION CO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE COX GIFFORD FUNERAL HOME

0322921 CAMPBELL, PETER 0322922 CONGRESSIONAL QUARTERLY INC 0322923 COPELAND, LINDA

MAY 21, 2002

-6-

2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09

2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09

2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09

01/ Uf' . \

371.00 105.13

1,120.20

500.00 500.00 46.00

20,498.22 54.54

306.00 46.00

132.00 39.95

, .

53,'937.00 1,132.93

300.00 104.00 884.15

2,379.00 43,110.00 3,879.37

8.00 46,647.34 2,633.00

115.20 1,000.00 2,431.84

51. 54' 3,789.52

73,707.93 14.98

295.76 67.00 6.00

42.83 360.92

5,472.66 1,000.00

41,809.11 87.50 70.76 20.00 33.30

176.45 500.00 14.09

86,190.65 112.80

51.50 198.07

54.21 500.00

67.00 264.08 167.54

11,899.38 125.00 229.95 171.00

1,-217.25 500.00

3;247.03 800.00 270.93 348.50 178.50

n,~ >d, , 1 , ,.

0322924 0322925 0322926 0322927 0322928 0322929 0322930 0322931 0322932 0322933 0322934 0322935 0322936 0322937 0322938 0322939 0322940 0322941 0322942 0322943 0322944 0322945 0322946

CLEM, POLACKWICH AND VOCEr.r.E CHILBERG CONSTRUCTION CO. CLEVELAND, CLARENCE

2002-05-09 .. 2002-05-09

2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05_09 2002-05-09

COMFORT INN LAKE BUENA VISTA CARSONlTE INTERNATIONAL CORP CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND COLUMBIA HOUSE 2002-05-09

2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05_09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05_09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05_09 2002-05-09 2002-05_09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09

.

0322947 0322948 0322949 0322950 0322951 0322952 0322953

CULTURAL COUNCIL OF INDIAN COLEMAN, CHARLES COURT REPORTERS, INC CARQUEST AUTO PARTS COASTAL TITLE SERVICES INC COASTAL ORTHOPAEDIC & CUTTER & BUCK COOPER, PAMELA J

CALLAWAY GOLF BALL CO COLLEGIATE PACIFIC CLARRY, ALISON CHOICEPOINT BUSINESS & CASA MONICA HOTEL CADTECH SEMINARS . BIG SKY COMPUTER PRODUCTS CENTRAL FLORIDA HAND CENTER CARNlCEr.T-A, JAMES CLEMENTS III, ROY W DAILY COURIER SERVICE DAVES SPORTING GOODS DELTA SUPPLY CO FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF

0322954 0322955 0322956 0322957 0322958 0322959 0322960 0322961 0322962 0322963 0322964 0322965 0322966 0322967 0322968 0322969 0322970 0322971 0322972 0322973 0322974 0322975 0322976 0322977 0322978 0322979 0322980 0322981 0322982 0322983 0322984 0322985 0322986 0322987 0322988

DEPENDABLE DODGE, INC DICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC DIRECTOR, KENNETH L MD PA FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS DAVIDSON TITLES, INC

2002-05-09 2002-05_09 2002-05_09 2002-05_09 2002-05-09

MAY 21, 2002

DEAF SERVICE CENTER OF THE DAVIS, JERRY DADE PAPER COMPANY DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC DIVINE SERVICE ENTERPRISES INC DIGITAL TECHNOGRAPHICS, INC DURA-STRESS, INC DISCOVERY INN DELL MARKETING L.P. E-Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC E G P, INC ELLIS K PHELPS AND CO, INC EBSCO SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES EMERGENCY MEDICINE ASSOCIATES ELDRIDGE, MYRA A ELPEX, INC EDLUND & DRITENBAS EXPEDITER INC, THE EWING, MARSHA ELITE TITLE OF THE TREASURE EVERGLADES FARM ELLIS, ANGIE FEDEX FISHER SCIENTIFIC FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY LLC FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF FLORIDA TIRE RECYCLING, INC FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF

-7-

2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05_09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05_09 2002-05_09 2002-05-09 2002-05_09 2002-05_09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05_09 2002-05_09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05_09

235.00 105,784.00

51.26 35.95

824.12 3.25

228.00 21.57

8,007.51 10.00

238.90 226.91 19.16

189.00 380.15 334.00 792.08 535.00 24.00 25.00

396.00 479.00

1,754.29 90.22 92.68

500.00 1,818.00

120.68 218.24

2,255.11

12.53 3,211.42

85.00 57.75

868.95 625.00 479.10 748.38 325.94

--190.00 287.50

27,495.00 245.00

19,919.00 88.50

344.00 .

18.92 5.00

205.00 318.50

1,429.33 1,216.41

70.25 6.00

15.55 1,156.77

200.00 82.23 87.55

4,689.59 1,026.15 2,628.63

272.07 997.20 115.00

BK

0322989 0322990 0322991 0322992

,

0322993 0322994 0322995 0322996 0322997 0322998 0322999

FW&PCOA FENIMORE, CHARLES FLORIDA VETERINARY LEAGUE F & W PUBLICATIONS INC FACTI CON , INC FLORIDA CLINICAL PRACTICE FREIGHTLINER TRUCKS OF SO'"'U1"""H FIRSTLAB FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE FLORIDA PAIN MANAGEMENT ASSOC FLORIDA COpy DATA

FAIT, CHARLOTTE

2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09

0323000 0323001 0323002 0323003 0323004 0323005 0323006 0323007 0323008 0323009 0323010 0323011 0323012 0323013 0323014 0323015 0323016 0323017 0323018 0323019 0323020 0323021 0323022 0323023 0323024 0323025 0323026 0323027 0323028 0323029 0323030 0323031 0323032 0323033 0323034 0323035 0323036 0323037 0323038 0323039 0323040 0323041 0323042 0323043 0323044 0323045

FLORIDA STORMWATER ASSOCIATION FLESCHER, ROSEMARY

2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 • 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09, 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09

0323046 0323047 0323048 0323049 0323050 0323051 0323052 0323053

MAY 21,2002

FERRELLGAS GALE GROUP, THE GII,r.ESPIE, JOHN GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC GALL'S INC GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER GOLFNET, INC GIFFORD COMMUNITY CENTER GIFFORD YOUTH ACTIVITIES CENTE GAGEL, SALOl GREAT-FULLY DEAD PEST MGMT INC GARVEY, ELEANOR HELD, PATRICIA BARGO BACH COMPANY HUSSAMY, OMAR MD HOLIDAY BUILDERS HANSEN, SUSAN HEALTHSOUTH HOLDINGS HARRIS, GREGORY PHD CVE HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE HURLEY, ROGNER, MII,I,ER, COX AND HE RAN , DEAN C. INDIAN RIVER HOMELESS HORNUNG'S HUBERT, LATOSHIA HYDRANAUTICS HAMILTON, DUSTIN HITCH, ROBERT HORL, THERESA H 0 K DESIGN + BUILD, INC HOME REPAIRS & REMODELING HYATT REGENCY MILWAUKEE INTEL I SOLVE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL IZOD CLUB INNOVATIVE NETWORK SYSTEMS INDIAN RIVER ALL-FAB, INC IRC EMPLOYEE H .:ALTH INSURANCEINDIAN RIVER COUNTY ee:ALTHY IMI-NET, INC

IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS INDIAN RIVER HAND REHAB INC JOHNSTON, RODNEY JAMES SMALLEY UTILITY SHEDS JONES & JONES JIMMY'S Alc & REFRIGERATION JONES, ELVIN JR

JANNACH PROPERTIES LTD

-8-

2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09

210.00 165.00

30.00 47.36

3,475.00 621.00 122.60

38.25 878.20

74.00 98.46

310.00 375.00 36.00

224.42 268.69 500.00

3,013.62 63.98

510.60 -- 58.0d

8,178.87 19,018.03

20.00 59.00 52.54

269.50 187.02

1,736.00 2,000.00

238.38 841.00 269.85

8,645.28 8,568.15

500.00 6,250.00

376.07 287.00

116,760.06 82.40 53.20 10.00

109,951.11 70.00

345.00 910.00 75.00

3,374.71 200.00 12.50

208.28 675.00

9.44 277 ,418.85

4,999.98 450.00

275.94 819.16 117.41

4,999.99 250.00 75.00

126.18 3,900.00

or : - 'f

'v - 'j -, . , ' . , .

::) f) t)

JULIAN, ROBERT KLUCINEC, MONA KURTZ, ERIC C MD KOUNS, DARLENE K S M ENGINEERING & TESTING KNOWLES, CYRIL KRISS, HOLDEN E KUESTERSTEFFEN, MIKE KAPPA, JORGE JENKINS, RENOLA H KENNEDY, IVA KENNEDY,ESQ.JOHN T KIRBY, WIL!.IAM LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC. LEWIS, RUTH A LABOR FINDERS L J RUFFIN & ASSOC

2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05_09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09

0323054 0323055 0323056 0323057 0323058 0323059 0323060 0323061 0323062 0323063 0323064 0323065 0323066 0323067 0323068 0323069 0323070 0323071 0323072 0323073 0323074 0323075 0323076 0323077 0323078 0323079

LANGSTON, HESS, BOLTON,ZNOSKO LUNA, JUVENAL

2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09

MARINE RESOURCES COUNCIL MUNICIPAL EQUIPMENT CO MIAMI HERALD, THE MADD MAC PAPERS, INC MCCLEARY, MILDRED MEDCHECK

0323080 MAYR, SHARON 0323081 MIKES GARAGE & WRECKER SERVICE 0323082 0323083 0323084 0323085 0323086 0323087 0323088 0323089 0323090 0323091

MGB CONSTRUCTION INC MARTIN, CRISTI

2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09

0323092 0323093 0323094 0323095 0323096 0323097 0323098 0323099 0323100 0323101 0323102 0323103 0323104 0323105 0323106 0323107 0323108 0323109 0323110 0323111 0323112

METTLER-TOLEDO FLORIDA, INC MEDICAL RECORDS SERVICES, INC MALLAMs, JOHN H, PHD MONTEJO, EDWARD MD MEDICAID AMBULANCE MCCREARY CORPORATION MATTENINI, GEORGE MORRISON, GAYE S

MAXFLI GOLF MOLLOY, CAl'Se:RINE MADDENS, FAWN , O,CONNOR, CHARLES M NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC NATIONAL DIRECTORY OF CHILDREN NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS NU CO 2, INC NEOPOST NORTHSIDE AGAPE MINISTRIES NORTHROP GRUMMAN COMMERCIAL OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE ON IT'S WAY OFFICE DEPOT, INC OSCEOLA PHARMACY OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY OFFICE DEPOT ORGANIC MILLING CO PALM BEACH NEWSPAPER, INC PARKS RENTAL INC PEACE RIVER ELECTRIC

0323113 PETTY CASH 0323114 PETTY CASH 0323115 PUBLIC DEFENDER 0323116 PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION 0323117 PBS & J

0323118 PETTY CASH

MAY 21, 2002

-9-

2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05_09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05_09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05_09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09

500.00 : 44.68 118.00 115.88 170.00

1,039.84 143.84 105.00 20.50 52.90 52.90

3,000.00 500.00 451.43 44.34

4,034.41 513.24

2,029.64 318.50 20.00

8,149.20 71. 75 50.00

130.60 414.96 523.59 202.59 270.00

1,500.00 80.50

1,340.10 17.37 80.75

104.00 225.88 104.48 52.54 26.87

896.40 28.91 70.00 25.00

512.58 125.00 227.97 17.85

145.00 .

5 ;·241. 54 5,330.00

142.03 1,029.88 4,778.22

693.57 30.00

123.04 59.33

260.00 63.09

190.48 79.31

161. 97 3,814.08

181,606.61 4,100.00

198.88

- \",' ...... BI( • r-~ . ; , I ; I '. .' / ,~, I" i ..- • I .J '- ......

" j "'I -I j

, " •

'.J ,

1; •• ,/

•

0323119 0323120 0323121 0323122 0323123 0323124 0323125 0323126 0323127 0323128 0323129 0323130 0323131 0323132 0323133 0323134 0323135 0323136 0323137

PORT CONSOLIDATED PLEZAT.I. WIPERS, INC PATRICK EXTERMINATING, INC PRIDGEON, RODGER DBA PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICE PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION PRESS JOURNAL PIONEER SCREEN CO INC II PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES, INC PHELPS, PAMELA G PERSONNEL PLUS INC REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING SVC PBS & J PESHA, JESSICA PICKERING, REBECCA LMT PARKER, TRAVIS QUEST DIAGNOSTICS PARKS AND SONS INC RINKER MATERIALS

RECORDED BOOKS, LLC R 6( G SOD FARMS RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE ROYAL CUP COFFEE RAPP, PAMELA REXEL CONSOLIDATED REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING ROGER DEAN CHEVROLET RICHARD ZORC & SONS BUILDERS R S MEDICAL RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES BREVARD RIZIO, HOWARD RIVERSIDE SURGERY CENTER REGENCY REPORTING, INC SCHOPP, BARBARA G SCOTT'S SPORTING GOODS SEWELL HARDWARE CO, INC SMART CORPORATION SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING, REXEL SOUTHERN ST LUCIE BATTERY & TIRE, INC STANDARD & POOR'S STURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO SUNCOAST WELDING SUPPLIES INC SUNRISE TRACTOR & EQUIPMNT INC SUNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY SERVICE REFRIGERATION CO, INC STRUNK FUNERAL HOME SAFESPACE INC SEMBLER, CHARLES W SALEM PRESS, INC SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL SEXTON, HILDY SPALDING SUN BELT MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC SYSCO OF SOUTHEAST FLORIDA SEBASTIAN, CITY OF STAGE & SCREEN SUNTRUST BANK

0323138 0323139 0323140 0323141 0323142 0323143 0323144 0323145 0323146 0323147 0323148 0323149 0323150 0323151 0323152 0323153 0323154 0323155 0323156 0323157 0323158 0323159 0323160 0323161 0323162 0323163 0323164 0323165 0323166 0323167 0323168 0323169 0323170 0323171 0323172 0323173 0323174 0323175 0323176 0323177 0323178 0323179 0323180 0323181 0323182 0323183

sou'!'ae:RN COMPUTER WAREHOUSE SCHOLASTIC SPORTS INC SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT SIMES CONSTRUCTION CO INC SPEIRS, DONNA SPACE COAST PATHOLOGISTS

MAY 21, 2002

-10-

2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09

2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09

QlI un , , , , I

r, ... ' .! / ./-- ~-

17,961.94 121.25 95.00

500.00 121. 60 251.04 133.35 30.00

500.00 260.00

1,140.00 1,279.53

18,876.00 3S.63

144.00 4S.00 80.00

1,247.50 12,416.47

843.20 160.00 177.10 241. 56 24.00

357.34 230.17 461.10

1,000.00 '. 64.00

56.00 420.98

1,995.00 224.60

66.50 1,308.94

78.S4 6.80

1,110.50 55.61

236.57 2,617.84

83.05 24.21 21.S5 60.00

526.18 1,100.00 2,115.38

117.55 424.20 55.00

5,609.55 SO.OO

1,264.70 1,374.20 1,062.91 9,901. 67

50.46 139.11 194.56 59.50 50.00

500.00 98.00

6.00

r'c ,"' • .- " ~,,·l~ • • , •

J - ~ '. ,) I .... ' Q U

0323184 0323185 0323186 0323187 0323188 0323189 0323190 0323191 0323192 0323193 0323194 0323195 0323196 0323197 0323198 0323199 0323200 0323201 0323202 0323203 0323204 0323205 0323206 0323207 0323208 0323209 0323210 0323211 0323212 0323213 0323214 0323215 0323216 0323217 0323218 0323219 0323220 0323221 0323222 0323223 0323224 0323225 0323226

ST HELENS CATHOLIC CHURCH STORAGE SOLUTIONS SOUTHWEST FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS SEMBLER, CHARLES W SUN CONTAINER INC SERRA, RACHEL SUNNYTECH INC- FL STEPHENS, LARRY SVI SYSTEMS INC SMITH, VANCE STATE ATTORNEY ACCOUNT SCHMITZ, BRIAN STELZ, RAY TIPPIN, JOHN W TECHNICALRESCUE.COM INC TREASURE COAST BUILDERS INC TOSHIBA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS FL TY COBB SERVICES INC TREASURE COAST REFUSE SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP TURF MASTER TRACTOR AND MOWER TRICARE REGION E TOTAL TRUCK PARTS INC TRIVIGNO, PETER TESTAMERlCA INC UNIVERSAL SIGNS & ACCESSORIES UNIVERSITY PRESS OF FLA ULVERSCROFT LARGE PRINT UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA U S FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP UNITED BLOWER, INC UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC UNISHIPPERS UNITED PARCEL SERVICE URGENT CARE WEST VERO BEACH, CITY OF VERO BEACH, CITY OF VIRGIL'S RADIATOR WORKS VERO MARINE CENTER, INC VERO RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES VERO ORTHOPAEDICS VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT

0323227 VERO BEARING & BOLT 0323228 VERO BEACH POWERTRAIN 0323229 VERO COLLISION CENTER

0323230 VETERANS COUNCIL OF INDIAN 0323231 WAL-MART 0323232 WALSH, LYNN 0323233 WILSON'S PETROLEUM EQ INC 0323234 WOLSTENHOLME, SHIRT.EY 0323235 WOODY'S PRINTING 0323236 W W GRAINGER, INC 0323237 WILLHOFF, PATSY 0323238 WILLIAM THIES & SONS, INC 0323239 WILSON, MARGARET F 0323240 WAUSAU 0323241 WASTE MANAGEMENT 0323242 WEISS & NEWBERRY MEDICAL ASSOC 0323243 WALGREEN COMPANY 0323244 WOMEN'S GOLF UNLIMITED 0323245 WOODS, DANIEL 0323246 WYNDHAM ORLANDO RESORT 0323247 WESTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT 0323248 XEROX CORPORATION

MAY 21,2002

-11-

2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09

2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09

281.96 213.37 281.00 94.68

1,269.88 38.63

296.36 280.00 45.00

, 52.57 1,425.00

580.00 281.04

74.45 2,848.96

500.00 126.52 110.00 584.60

2,546.85 1,958.00

610.28 387.52 150.64 54.21

279.00 3,884.25

81.93 651.45 480.00

62,459.95 88.76

5,033.82 61.34 15.08

723.00 51,181. 57 1,146.99

60.00 16.30 47.00

838.88 50.00

258.47 102.00

1,128.00

3,527.05 1,076.57

26.68 258.90 42.80

590.50 199.20 130.00 742.80 1.30.50

51.26 494.07 305.70

1,758.43 59.88

491. 70 214.00 500.00 695.59

R!! Ui \

0323249 0323250 0323251 0323252 0323253 0323254 0323255 0323256 0323257 0323258 0323259 0323260 0323261 0323262 0323263 0323264 0323265 0323266 0323267 0323268 0323269 0323270 0323271 0323272 0323273 0323274 0323275

YAVORSKY'S TRUCK SERVlCE,INC ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE MC NEAL, PATRICK HILLERY, DORIS MILLER, JOSEPH ANGELONE, RANIERO WODTKE, RUSSELL LICARI, LINDA LAUER, RAYMOND ROYAL, THOMAS GERRY, RAYMOND GELD, TONIA AMERITREND HOMES BIG AND BEAUTIFUL BILKEN GROUP BURGOON BERGER BURGOON AND BERGER CHANNING CORP CHANNING CORP . DJ OF IRC INC FIRST FL DEV AND CONSTRUCTION HOLIDAY BUILDERS IRC KELLY CONSTRUCTION MCDONALD PROPERTIES MGB CONSTRUCTION ORCHID ISLAND PROPERTIES

0323276 0323277 0323278 0323279 0323280 0323281 0323282 0323283 0323284 0323285 0323286 0323287 0323288 0323289 0323290 0323291 0323292 0323293 0323294 0323295

PASSAGE ISI.E HOMES INX SEA OAKS INVESTMENT SEA OAKS INVESTMENT ALBRECHT, ROBERT &

BEATY, DON COLON, SPRING CORDEIRO, ARTHUR COX, JEAN ELLWOOD, JOHN FUENTES, URBANO HARTLESS, GEORGE KIM, YOUNG SOO JOHN JR., KOWALSKI LEBRECHT, CLINTON MAGNIFICO, PETER PALESTRINI, PAUL PERRY, WILLIAM RAYMOND, JAMES REESE, HAZEL THOMAS, ALAN AND

0323296 woo, SAMMY

0323297 TOZZOLO BROTHERS 0323298 ESTATE OF WILLIE REESE 0323299 0323300 0323301 0323302 0323303 0323304 0323305 0323306 0323307 0323308 0323309 0323310 0323311 0323312 0323313

MAY 21, 2002

HART, CELIA BRANDON CAPITAL CORP RUSSO, JOHN BURGOON BERGER CONST CO LAWRENCE, CRAIG HOLIDAY BUILDERS MERRILL, CRAIG AND

CEMCO REED, TAMARA JOHNSON, SHARON COETO JR, ANTHONY DIETRICH, TRICIA JAHOLKOWSKI ETIENNE, AIGNER COLANDREA, JAMES A GHO VERO BEACH INC

-12-

2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09

2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09 2002-05-09

pu ui\

(,,(, r"'; ~ ~ t ,_,

385.37 79.57

179.82 827.44 454.52 950.40 295.97 476.80 571.00 641.26 783.76 444.00 34.23 16.41 42.69 66.93 31. 78

180.74 64.65 26.41

197.03 26.41 26.41 34.74 41. 78 31.78 9.59

26.41 41. 78 69.23 26.85 50.00 61.35 14.26 30.64 21.38

~ 76.73 42.78 42.48 26.41 11.93 6.20

56.02 31.14 9.59

105.36 4.70

17.57 34.68 41.78 20.41 87.80 46.49 72.05 8.29

160.90 33.28

4.65 13.61 48.88 1.14

50.32 77.87 40.20 43.01

,-', n " ; ~ .... . , t, ~ ~ '~;. i I' -.- . ' ...

0323314 MIDKIFF, STEVE AND 2002-05-09 48.71 0323315 LESTER, MICHAEL R 2002-05-09 82.66 0323316 KEHLENBECK, ROBERT 2002-05-09 89.76 0323317 PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES 2002-05-09 100.00 0323318 FITZSIMONS III, BERNARD F 2002-05-09 41.28 0323319 DILLON, GARY 2002-05-09 19.07 0323320 EI.I.ERMAN, KEITH 2002-05-09 52.18 0323321 RUSS, RAYMOND 2002-05-09 39.18

0323322 LAKAS, CJ!:CELIA A 2002-05-09 21.28 0323323 LURIA IMPROVEMENTS LLC 2002-05-09 155.37 0323324 MORRIS, RICHARD W 2002-05-09 32.86 0323325 HAMILTON PLACE INC 2002-05-09 45.43 0323326 TCIMPIDIS, DAVID AND 2002-05-09 9.10 0323327 CHORA, PAULA J 2002-05-09 63.59 0323328 RICCI, KATHY 2002-05-09 74.17 0323329 HAEGER, SANDRA 2002-05-09 79.03 0323330 BAGELS PLUS 2002-05-09 22.95 -0323331 ERSIK, MICHAEL 2002-05-09

. -- 64.64

0323332 TRI SURE CORP 2002-05-09 345.00 0323333 MAHER, CA'l'ee:RlNE T 2002-05-09 17.21 0323334 CELTIC CONTACTS INC 2002-05-09 36.32 0323335 WHITFIELD, SHANNON 2002-05-09 68.94 0323336 SWEDa, ROBERTA R 2002-05-09 33.80 0323337 BOWMAN, JOHANN 2002-05-09 72.58 0323338 CHAMBERS POA, DONALD J 2002-05-09 48.66 0323339 MALDONADO, MICHELLE ANN 2002-05-09 25.37 0323340 HUBERT ENTERPRISES 2002-05-09 50.00 0323341 YORK, ARTHUR 2002-05-09 32.72 0323342 AUSBY, DONNIE 2002-05-09 28.72

1,884,137.66

7.B. GHA RIVER VILLAGE, INC. - FINAL PLAT ApPROVAL FOR RIVER

VILLAGE - GRAND HARBOR PLAT 26 (QUASI-JUDICIAL)


TO: James E. Chandler; County Administrator

•

ert Director

4· f3. THROUGH: Stan Boling, AlCP; Planning

FROM: •

Peter J. Radke; Senior Planner, Current Development

DATE: May 13,2002

SUBJECT: GHA River Village, Inc.'s Request for Final Plat Approval for River Village -Grand Harbor Plat 26

It is requested that the data herein presented be given fOllIlal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of May 21,2002.

MAY 21, 2002

-13-

DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS:

Grand Harbor Plat 26 is a subdivision of a 26.84-acre parcel into 16 single-family lots, a multifamily tract (84 units), and a number of other tracts that will be used for various uses including landscaping, stoIlllwater management, conservation, and recreation. The subject property is part of the overall Grand Harbor Planned Development (PD) and is consistent with the Grand Harbor conceptual PD plan .. The subject site is located in the southeast portion of the overall Grand Harbor development, is zoned RM-6, and has an M-1 land use designation.

On September 14, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted preliminary PD plan/plat approval for Grand Harbor Plat 26. The applicant has subsequently obtained a land development permit and commenced construction of the project. The applicant is proposing to "bond-out" for completion of the remaining required improvements as allowed by the land development regulations (LDRs). Now, the applicant is requesting final plat approval and has submitted the following:

1. A final plat in conformance with the approved preliminary PD plan/plat;

2. An Engineers Certified Cost Estimate for the remaining required improvements;

3. A completed Contract for Construction of remaining required improvements; and

4. A Cash Deposit and Escrow Agreement to guarantee the Contract.

ANALYSIS:

All of the required subdivision improvements have been completed except for one sidewalk segment. The applicant is proposing to "bond-out" for that sidewalk segment as provided for in the county's LDRs. Public Works has reviewed and approved the submitted Engineer's Certified Cost Estimate and corresponding cash escrow amount. The County Attorney's Office has reviewed and approved the submitted Contract for Construction. The cash escrow, Which represents I 15% of the estimated cost to construct the remaining sidewalk segment, has been submitted. It should be noted that all improvements within the Grand Harbor development will be private, with the exception of certain utilities facilities that will be dedicated and guaranteed to Indian River County as required by the Utility Services Department.

RECOMMENDATION:

Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant final plat approval for Grand Harbor Plat 26 and authorize the Chairman to execute the submitted Contract for Construction of remaining required improvements and the Cash Deposit and Escrow Agreement.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Application 2. Location Map 3. Plat Layout 4. Contract for Construction (Draft) 5. Cash Deposit and Escrow Agreement (Draft)

MAY 21, 2002

-14-

01/ I 1, \ '-' ,

I.., r ',' r I ~ . , . . ~



unanimously granted final plat approval for Grand

Harbor Plat 26 and authorized the Chairman to

execute the Contract for Construction of Remaining

Required Improvements and the Cash Deposit and

Escrow Agreement, as recommended by staff.

DOCUMENTATION IS ON FILE IN THE

OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD

7. C. KENNEDY GROVES, INC. - FINAL PLAT ApPROVAL FOR OLD ORCHID

PHASE III SUBDIVISION (QUASI-JUDICIAL)


TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator

Community Development A·{)-

THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP Planning Director

FROM: Mark Zans /i1 z-Senior Planner, Current Development

DATE: May 14, 2002

SUBJECT: Kennedy Groves, Inc. Request for Final Plat Approval for Old Orchid Phase III Subdivision

MAY 21, 2002

-15-

RII . I") 'I r '. .,' •. : l Ui\ • ___ .-

It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of May 21, 2002.

DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:

Old Orchid Phase ill subdivision is a 30 lot, 7.28 acre portion of the four phase Old Orchid P.D (planned Development) project. Located on the north side of CR 510 and east of Jungle Trail, the property is zoned PD, and has a L-2 land use designation (low density 2 up to 6 units per acre]. The density of the Phase ill subdivision is 4.25 lInits per acre. The first two phases of Old Orchid PD have been platted. Phase I has been completed and Phase II has been partially built out. The roads and stormwater management system within Phase II are being extended into Phase ill to serve the Phase ill lots.

At its regular meeting of May 5,1998, the Board of County Commissioners approved the Old Orchid Conceptual PD plan for all four phases. Subsequently, on January 24,2002, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted preliminary PD plan/plat approval for Old Orchid Phase m The developer has obtained a land development permit and has constructed some of the Phase ill required improvements. Now, the developer is requesting final plat approval for Phase ill and has submitted the following:

1.A final plat in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary PD plat / plan.

2. A certified cost estimate for the remaining required Phase ill subdivision improvements.

3. A copy of a contract for construction for the remaining required improvements.

4. A security arrangement guaranteeing the contract for construction.

The Board is now to grant final plat approval.

. .

ANALYSIS:

Some of the required Phase ill subdivision improvements have been completed, and the developer proposes to bond-out for construction of the remaining required improvements to proceed with final plat approval. The format of the final plat and the financial security have been approved by the' County Attorney's Office, and unit cost for construction items have been approved by Public Works, Utility Services, and the Planning Division. The developer has also submitted a copy of the Contract for Construction of Required Improvements. All subdivision improvements are privately dedicated with the exception of the utility system, which will be separately warranted through the Department of Utility Services. Based on submission of the previously referenced contract and security, all requirements of final plat approval are satisfied.

RECOMMENDATION:

Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant final plat approval for Old Orchid Phase ill subdivision, and authorize the Chairman to execute the contract and any security docUIllents and accept the security.

MAY 21, 2002

-16-



unanimously granted final plat approval for Old

Orchid Phase III Subdivision and authorized the

Chairman to execute the contract and any security

documents and accept the security, as recommended

by staff.

DOCUMENT A TIO~~~hON FILE IN THE


7. De BID #4060-PORTABLE TRAILER MOUNTED GENERATOR (UTILITIES)-

ALTERNATIVE POWER SOURCES, LLC

The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 8, 2002:

DATE:

TO:

THROUGH:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

MAY 21, 2002

May 8,2002

BOARD OF COUNTY COMtYfISSIONERS,

James E. Chandler, County Administrator

Thomas Frame, General Services, Director -t/Uu.4

Erik Olson, Utilities Department, Director

Fran Powell, Purchasing Manage ........

IRC Bid # 4060 Portable Trailer Mounted Generator Utilities Department

-17-

,

'-', .") r t' , I ,- , ,. 1 t~

'~! ~ " j " 'I " ' \,.1 '-1 '-

BACKGROUND:

. .

The Utilities Department has requested the purchase of a portable trailer mounted generator for the South County Water Plant. This generator will be used to supply power to the wells at the plant in the event of a power outage. The bid results are as follows:

Bid Opening Date: Advertising Dates:

April 24, 2002 April 10 and 17, 2002

DemandStar Broadcast to: Specification's requested by: Replies:

Two Hundred Eighty Seven (287) vendors Forty-One (41) vendors Seven (7) vendors

BID TABULATION:

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

Vendor

Alternative Power Sources LLC Plant Cit, FL Standby Systems Inc Melbourne, FL CJ's Sales and Service Ocala, FL

NextGen Power Systems of New Jersey Inc llimilton, NJ TAW Power Systems Pompano Beach, FL Florida Detroit Diesel - Allison Ft. Lauderdale, FL

Walker Miller Equipment Co Inc Orlando, FL

ESTIMATED BUDGET: $105,000.00

TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID: $50,634.00

"1-

-t

SOURCE OF FUNDS: 471-219-536-066.49

Amount

$50,634.00

$57,325.00

$61,161.00

$69,995.00

$70,395.00

$84,560.00

$92,380.00

Utilities - Capital Heavy EqUipment

RECOMMENDATION:

Delivery Time

49 days

84-112 days

60 days

100 days

84 days

90 days

45-60 days

Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Alternative Power Sources, LLC as the lowest most responsive and responsible bidder meeting the specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid. 0

MAY 21, 2002 n'l oK ,-.A ..

I...~ 4

;0

-18-



unanimously awarded Bid #4060 to Alternative

Power Sources, LLC in the amount of $50,634, as


BID DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE IN THE


WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED

7.E. PROCLAMATION HONORING MA JAYA SATI BHAGAVATI

Commissioner Ginn stated that she could not support this Proclamation.

HONORING MA JAYA SATI BHAGAVATI

WHEREAS, Ma Jaya Sati Bhagavati is an internationally respected spiritual leader, teacher and founder of the Kashi Foundation; and

•

WHEREAS, Kashi is an interfaith spiritual community that embraces the sacred practices of many traditions, with the ministry and teachings based upon a commitment to humanity through service; and

-WHEREAS, Ma Jaya is known not only for her compassionate~ work with death and dying and caring for those in need, but also for her advocacy of human rights, religious freedom and equality, and it is through this commitment to humanity that the River Fund and the River School were born; and

MAY 21, 2002

-19-

WHEREAS, Kashi provides a sacred environment for the individual pursuit of spiritual enlightenment, the River Fund is dedicated to serving people throughout the world with AIDS and other life challenging illnesses, and the River School provides its PreK - 12 stUdents with an environment that weaves spirituality, service and awareness into a quality education; and

WHEREAS, Ma Jaya is a Trustee of the Parliament of the World's Religions and a member of the United Religions Initiative, and is working with other religious and spiritual leaders to promote interfaith dialogue and global cooperation for peace. In

-. - .

1997, Ma Jaya established World Tibet Day to raise awareness of the plight of the Tibetan people and support for international freedom of religion for everyone.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the Board recognizes the accomplishments of Ma Jaya Sati Bhagavati on the 25th Anniversary of Kashi Ashram.

Adopted this 21 st day of May, 2002.

MAY 21,2002

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA

Ruth M. Stan bridge, Ch man


SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board,

by a 3-2 vote (Commissioners Ginn and Tippin

opposed), accepted the Proclamation for the record.

O'{ I, Ui I

-20-

7.F. ANTI-DRUG ABUSE GRANT FUNDING - FISCAL YEAR 2002-03 -

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT - MULTI-A GENCY

DRUG ENFORCEMENT UNIT (MACE) - PREVENT (SUBSTANCE ABUSE

COUNCIL) - SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL ,


TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners

DATE: May 14, 2002

SUBJECT: FISCAL YEAR 200212003 ANTI-DRUG ABUSE GRANT FUNDING

THROUGH: Joseph A. Baird

FROM:

Assistant County Administrator

Jason E. Brown Budget Manager

BACKGROUND

For the past twelve fiscal years, Indian River County has been allocated grant funds from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement to fund local anti-drug abuse programs. The Board has funded the following programs the past two years:

Agency Implementing

200012001 2001/2002 Agency

1. Multi-Agency Drug Enforcement IRC Sheriff $120,480 $110,838 UnitJM:A.C.E.

2. PREVENT (Substance Abuse Indian River County $ 68,844 $ 62,234 Council

3. Substance Abuse Council ofIRC Indian River County $ 21,036 $ 19,230

TOTAL $210,360 $192,302

The County received a letter dated March 11, 2002 from the Florida Depar tment of Law Enforcement (FDLE) stating that Indian River County has been allocated $159,323 in federal grant funds for FY 2002/2003, to fund local anti-drug abuse programs. This amount is an increase from the previous year when Indian River County received $144,226 in federal funds. The letter also requested that the Board serve as the coordinating unit of government in applying for the funds. At the commission meeting on April 2, 2002, the Board accepted the invitation to serve as the coordinating unit of government and Damed Jason E. Brown, Budget Manager, as the contact person.

MAY 21, 2002 ~ !. Q l ) \;..~ J

,,... • .,;,F

-21-

PROPOSED FUNDING FOR FY 200212003

The Substance Abuse Council Advisory Board recommended three (3) programs as listed below:

Programs to be Funded Implementing State Share Matching

Total Agency 75% 25%

Multi-Agency Drug Enforcement Unit IRC Sheriff Dept. $ 89,129 $29,710 $118,839 (MAC.E.) PREVENT (Substance

Indian River County $ 54,262 $18,087 $ 72,349 Abuse Council)

Substance Abuse Council -Indian River County $ 15,932 $ 5,311 - $ 21,243 -

of Indian River COlmty

TOTAL $159,323 $53,107 .

$212,430 • .

(Note: FIgures are rounded to the nearest dollar. This results in a rounding difference for the total.)

The grand total of all three projects is $212,430.00. If a project cannot be implemented due to the budget cuts, then the money allocated for the project will be redistributed to other projects already listed.

The M.A.C.E. Unit, Substance Abuse Council and PREVENT all receive their match from Indian River County Board of Commission funds since they are agencies of the Connty.

Copies of the grant applications are on file in the Board of County Commissioners office and the Budget Office for review.

RECOMMENDATION

Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the Substance Abuse Council's recommendations and authorize the Board Chairman to sign the grant applications and other necessary related documents for submittal to the state by the deadline of Tuesday, June 4,2002.

MAY 21,2002



unanimously approved the Substance Abuse

Council's recommendations and authorized the

Chairman to sign the grant applications and other

necessary related documents for submittal to the

State by the deadline of Tuesday, June 4, 2002, as


DOCUMENTATION IS ON FILE IN THE


-22-

nu U:\

7. G. JUNGLE TRAIUPELICAN ISLAND WILDLIFE REFUGE _ REVISED

CHANGE ORDER #1 - SUMMIT CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC.


TO:

THROUGH:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

REFERENCE:

DATE:

James Chandler, County Administrator

James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works .

Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E., County Sn

Jungle TraillPelican island Wildlife RefugeNO.1 for Summit Construction Management, Inc.

IRC Project No. 9724

May 13, 2002

DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS

CONSENT

CHANGE ORDER

On May 7,2002, the Board of County Commissioners approved Change Order No.1 to the contract for Summit Construction Management, Inc. for an increase in the contract amount of$11,181.68 for 824 l.f of 6" force main for the proposed facilities for the Jungle TraillPelican Island Wildlife Refuge project.

The Change Order No.1, approved on May 7, 2002, shows an Original Contract Price of $1,214,911.21. This figure incorrectly includes costs for related services including house moving and archeological services not included in the contract with Summit Construction Management, Inc. The original contract amount for Summit Construction Management, Inc. is $1,203,061.21.

Revised Change Order No.1 to the contract reflects the addition of the 6" force main along SRA-1-A. The total additional cost is $11,181.68 and no additional time will be added to the contract. Current Contract Price including all Revised Change Order No 1 is $1,214,242.89.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING

Staff recommends approval of Alternative No.1. Funding to be from the Pelican Park Force Main (Jungle Trail FM) account number 472-000-169-511.

MAY 21,2002

-23-

•



unanimously approved Revised Change Order # 1

with Summit Construction Management, Inc.

reflecting the addition of the 6" force main along SR

A-1-A for a total additional cost of $11, 18l.68 for

a total contract price of $1,214,242.89, as


CHANGE ORDER IS ON FILE IN THE


7.H. MISCELLANEOUS BUDGET AMENDMENT #012


To: Members of the Board of County Commissioners

Through: Joseph A. Baird Assistant County Administrator

From: Jason E. Brown Budget Manager

Date: May 13, 2002

Subject: Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 012

Description and Conditions

The attached budget amendment appropriates funding necessary for the following:

- -

1. Each year Indian River County pays for its portion of the cost of the annual Florida Inland Navigation District (F.I.N.D.) Banquet. The attached entry appropriates $200 from General Fund Contingencies.

MAY 21,2002

-24-BII I -

...... , nr • f'~ • ..... . ) ' i' -J /

. - t' ,- r'<- 1'\ ) 1:\ L ..... ' " - . '--' • -

2. DUring a special meeting on February 1, 2002, the Board of Commissioners approved a 3% Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) for members of the firefighters' collective bargaining unit. This increase became effective on February 1, 2002. The attached entry appropriates funding from Emergency Services District contingencies.

3. On May 15, 2001, the Board of Commissioners approved a Florida Inland NaVigation District (FIND) Waterways Assistance Program grant for the purchase of a patrol and rescue vessel for the Sheriffs Department. This grant provided funding of $34,478 with a required 50% match. The required match ($34,478) is provided by the Sheriffs. Law Enforcement Trust Fund.

4. Emergency Services did not expend all Radiological Emergency Preparedness grant funds for the 2000101 fiscal year. At the end· of the fiscal year, $25,998 in funds remained. In accordance with the grant, these funds can be rolled forward to the current year. The attached entry appropriates funding.

5. On April 23, 2002, the Board of Commissioners approved funding for modular office space and office furniture for the Supervisor of Elections. The attached entry appropriates funding from General Fund contingencies in the amount of $248,615.

Staff Recommendation

Staff recommends that the Board of Commissioners approve the attached budget amendment.



unanimously approved Miscellaneous Budget

Amendment #012, as recommended by staff.

To: Members of the Board of County Commiss _~

Budget Amendment: 012

From: Jason E. Brown Budget Manager

Entry Fundi umber Account

1. Expenses

Board Oth.

FundI • cles

MAY 21, 2002

Date: May 21, 2002

Account Number Increase Decrease

001-101-511-033.19 $200 $0 for

001-199-581-099.91 $0 $200

-25-

To: Members of the Board Budget Amendment: 012 of County Commissioners

/ From: Jason E. Brown Date: May 21,2002

Budget Manager

Entry Fund! ". Account Number Increase Decrease ~ Number

-+ 2. Expenses

Emergency Services ~ 114-120-522-011.12 $95,918 $0 Services! ~ular Salaries --Emergency Services District! Fire 114-120-522-011.14 $7,194 $0

~ Emergency Services15fStriCt1 Fire 114-120-522-012.11 $6,393 $0 Services! Social

""T ~ Fil 114-120-522-012.12 $19,014 $0 Servicesl Retirement( ~ Emergency Services District! Fire 114-120-522-012.14 $5,671 $0 ~s Comf)ens_a1i()r1

$0 Emergency Services District Fire 114-120-522-012.13 $384 Services/life Insurance

cy serviCeS District! Fire 114-120-522-012.17 $1,494 $0 ~re Emergency Services Ire 114-120-522-099.91 $0 $136,068 ServiceslC~

-t

3. Revenues

Law ~Trust Fund! 112-000-351-020.00 $34,478 $0

-+ Law Enforcement Trust Fundi 112-000-334-077.00 $34,478 $0 FIND Waterwa Assistance~.

-j

Expenses

""T Law EI1fOrC"ementTi1iSiFUrid7 112-600-521-066.49 $68,956 $0

Other Ma~ & r:~. -t

+ 4. Revenues

General Fundi Cash Forward - 001-000-389-040.00 $25,998 $0 October 1

Expenses

GeneralFUndl REP GranU Other 001-237-525-033.49 $25,998 $0 Contractual Services --

5. Expenses

General FundI Buildings & 001-220-519-034.49 $22,400 $0 Grounds/ Rent - Other E ui ment --------+-----t--~--General Fundi Buildings & 001-220-519-041.25 $190,215 $0 Grounds/ Buildin LiA~lt~e~ra~ti~o!:!!ns~_+ _______ -t-____ T_---=-~ __ General Fundi Buildings & 001-220-519-066.41 $36,000 $0 Grounds/ Office Fumiture

General FundI Reserve for 001-199-581-099.91 $0 1--__ --I--"-C_on-'-tJ_·n ~e~nc~i~es~ ______ ..J..-________________ _

$248,615

MAY 21,2002 n!l i r~ t' "- C ;""' . '0

5 I ) "' " ! • Dh /' i.., •• , , ,

, I 1<,-<.-:. , ,

I c) • '0' • • " . , ,'.-' '. -.>.

-26-

9.A.l. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE 2002-020 AMENDING

THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING

ZONING MAP FOR 13.94 ACRES LOCATED ON THE

NORTH SIDE OF 26TH STREET APPROXIMATELY 400

FEET WEST OF 66TH AVENUE FROM A-I TO RM-6

JAMES AND LORA ADAMSON uasi-Judicial PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE

CLERK TO THE BOARD


TO: James E. Chandler; County Administrator

HEAD CONCURRENCE

ert M. Keating,

THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP; Chief, L

Director

Planning -=S. ·4. FROM:

DATE:

RE:

Randy Deshazo; Planner, Long-Range Planning~

May 13, 2002

Adamson request to rezone ±13.94 acres from A-I to Rt'1-6 (RZON 2002-03-0099)

It is requested that the following information be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of May 21, 2002.


This is a request to rezone 13.94 acres from A-I, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit'5 acres), to RM-6, Multiple-Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre). Located on 26th Street, the subject property is approximately 400 feet west of 66th A venue. The purpose of this request is to secure the zoning necessary to develop the site at a density consistent with its L-2 comprehensive plan land use designation.

On April 25, 2002, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6 to 0 to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve the request to rezone the subj ect property.

MAY 21, 2002

-27-

EXisting Land Use Pattern

Generally, this area of the county contains a mix of agricultural and residential uses. The subject property, which contains a citrus grove, is zoned A-I. The two adjacent properties on the west, which contain rangelands and woodlands, are also zoned A-I. Further west of the subject property, along 26

th

Street, are the RM-6 zoned Walker Avenue Club Apartments and the RMH-8 zoned, Mobile Home Residential District (up to 8 llnits/acre), Village Green Mobile Home Park. The land to the east is zoned RM-6, Multiple-Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre).

I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

MAY 21,2002

Figure: Location and Zoning of the Subject Property

~,u: ».cIA!: ILOll

A

Street

-28-

TR16

H!IJ:!

A-l

I

ANTI.

DlI Oi\

:/IlD1oC

r:u.,J! II

RM-6

"117 LIlI. I

-

, I I I I I I I

loa... I , I I , I I , I I

Immediately to the north, a 20 acre parcel is zoned RS-6, Single-Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre). The Vista Plantation Condominiums, zoned RM-4, Multiple-Family Residential District (up to 4 units/acre), are to the south of the subject property, across 26th Street. East of the Vista Plantation Condominiums, across 66

th Avenue, is the Indian River Mall, zoned CG, General Commercial.

Future Land Use Pattern

Land along the north side of 26th

Street, including the entire subject property, is designated L-2, LOW-Density Residential-2, on the county Future Land Use Map. The L-2 designation permits residential uses with densities up to 6 units/acre. Land abutting the northwest comer of the site is designated L-I, LOW-Density Residential-I, on the county Future Land Use Map. The L-I designation permits residential Uses with densities up to 3 units/acre. Land to the south of the subj ect property, along the south side of 26

th Street, is designated M -1, Medium-Density Residential_

I, on the county future land use map. The M-1 designation permits residential uses with densities --up to 8 units/acre. The Indian River Mall is designated RC, Regional Commercial, on the county Future Land Use Map. The RC designation pennits regional malls and associated retail shopping centers designed to serve markets beyond the county boundaries.

Environment

Being a citrus grove, the subject property is an altered site. The subject property is not designated as envirorunentally important nor envirorunentally sensitive by the comprehensive plan. No wetlands or native upland habitat exists on the site. According to Flood Insurance Rating Maps, the subject property does not contain any flood hazard areas.

Utilities and Services •

The site is within the Urban Service Area of the county. Wastewater service is available to the site from the Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant, While potable water service is available to the site from the South County Reverse Osmosis Plant.

Transportation System

The property's south boundary abuts 26th

Street. Classified as a collectorroad on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map, this segment of 26

th Street is a 2-lane paved road with approximately 60 feet

of existing public road right-of-way. This segment of 26 th Street is currently planned for expansion to 80 feet of public road right-of-way by 2020.

ANALYSIS

In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the rezoning request will be presented. Specifically, this section will include:

• an analysis of the request's impact on public facilities;

• an analysis of the request's consistency with the county's comprehensive plan; • an analysis of the request's compatibility with the surrounding area; and • an analysis of the request's potential impact on envirorunental quality.

MAY 21, 2002 , ""j I"'l • I ) .' ,

) ~ , "

, , ' : , , .' ., . " , ..... - • '- ~

-29-

,-J

..,~

; f

Concurrency of Public Facilities

Thi, ,it, i, lo''',d within th, 'ounty ",ban 'om" =" an =a d'''''0<1 ""tod fo, ""'an scal, d",dopmont. The Comp"h""iv, Plan "t,bli,h" 'land,,,!, for. Trnruportation, Potabl, Watec, W""w,toc, Solid W"t" Stonnw,tcr Manag"""'t and Pm", and R,cr,ation. Th, "'",u"" provision of these services is necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. The Comprehensive Plan and Land DevelopmentReguJations (LDRs) also require that new development be reviewed to ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for these services and facilities are maintained.

Policy 3.2 ofthe Future Land Use Element states that no development shall be approved unless it is consistent with the concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements Element. For rezoning requests, conditional concurrency review is required.

Conditional concurrency review eXamines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a proposed project. Since rezoning requests are not projects, county regulations call for the concurrency review to be based upon the most intense Use of the subject property based upon the requested zoning. For residential rezoning requests, the most intense use (according to the County's LD&) i, th, maximum numb" of units that oould b, built on th, ,it" given th, 'izo of th, propcrty and th, maximum d,n,ity und" the pmpo"d zoning. Th, ,it, information "'''' foc the ,on'Urren,y analysis is as follows:

1. Size of Area to be Rezoned: 13.94 acres

2. Existing Zoning District: A-I, Agricultural District (up to 1 unitls acres)

3. Proposed Zoning District:

RM-6, Multiple-Family ReSidential District (up t06 units/acres)

4. Most Intense Use of Subject Property Under Existing Zoning District:

5. Most Intense Use of SUbject Property Under Proposed Zoning District: . .

. Transportation

2 Single-Family Units

83 Multiple-Family Units

As part of the concurrency review process, the applicant has submitted a Traffic Impact Statement (TIS). The county's Traffic Engineering Division has reviewed and approved that TIS. A TIS

reports the number of peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips th~t ,:ould be g~nerated by ~e most intense use of the subject property under the proposed zonmg distnct, and asSIgns those trips to impacted roads. Impacted roads are defined in section 910.09(4~(b)3 of the county's LDRs as roadway segments which receive five percent (5%) or more ofthe project traffic or fifty (50) or more project trips, whichever is less.

Accordincr to the approved TIS, the existing level of service on impacted roadways would not be lowered b; the traffic generated by development of83 multiple-family lIni ts on the subject property.

Water

With the proposed zoning, the subject property could accommodate 83 residential :nuts, resulting in water consumption at a rate of 83 Equivalent Residential Units (ERU), or 20,7)0 gallons/day. This is based upon a level of service of 250 gallonsIERU/day. Residential development on the subject property would be served by the South County Reverse Osmosis Plant wm,ch curren~l~ has a remaining capacity of approximately 3,900,000 gallons/day and can accommodate the addItIOnal demand generated by the proposed rezoning.

MAY 21,2002

-30-

011 I " '0 ro ,... ,. [: ' .' •

• • ~.J ,

~ ~ 1 , , , I 1 j' \ • • i , "

',,) • L. '.~. , , . '-' .

· - '" -0 ., U

'Wastewater

B~ed upon the most intense us.e allowed under t1;te proposed zoning, development of the property wIll have a wastewater ge~e~atlOn rate of approxImately 83 Equivalent Residential Units (ERU), or 20,750 gallons/day. :rm~ IS b~ed upon th~ level of service standard of250 gallonslERUIday. County wastewater servIce IS avaIlable to the SIte from the Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant, which currently has a remaining capacity of more than 1,100,000 gallons/day and can accommodate the additional wastewater generated by the subject request.

Solid Waste

Solid waste service includes pick-up by private operators and disposal at the county landfill. The county's adopted level of service standard for landfill capacity is 1.97 cubic yards/person/year. With the county's average of approximately 2.3 persons/unit, a 83 unit residential development would be anticipated to house approximately 190 people (2.3 X 83). For the subject request to meet the county's adopted level of service standard of 1.97 cubic yards/person/year, the landfill must have enough capacity to accommodate approximately 374.3 (190 X 1.97) cubic yards/year.

A review of the solid waste capacity for the active segment of the county landfill indicates the availability of more than 800,000 cubic yards. The active segment of the landfill has a 2 year capacity, and the landfill has expansion capacity beyond 2010. Based on the analysis, staff deteImined that the county landfill can accommodate the additional solid waste generated by the site under the proposed zoning district.

Stonllwater Management

All developments are reviewed for compliance with county stormwater regulations which require on-site retention, preservation of flood plain storage and minimum finished floor elevations. In addition, development proposals must meet the discharge requirements of the county Stonnwater Management Ordinance. Since the site is located within the M-1 Drainage Basin and the Indian River Farms Water Control District (IRFWCD), development on the property will be prohibited from discharging any runoff in excess of two inches in a twenty-four hour period, which is the approved IRFWCD discharge rate.

In this case, the minimum floor elevation level of service standards do not apply, since the property does not lie within a flood plain. However, both the on-site retention and discharge standards apply.

Based upon staff s analysis, the storrnwater management level of service standard would be met by limiting off-site discharge to the IRFWCD's maximum discharge rate of two inches in twenty-four hours, and requiring retention of 253,404 cubic feet of runoff for the most intense use of the property.

As with all development, a more detailed review will be conducted during the development approval process.

Recreation

A review of county recreation facilities and the projected demand that would result from the most intense development that could occur on the property under the proposed zoning district indicates that the adopted levels of service would be maintained. The table below illustrates the additional park demand associated with the proposed development of the property and the existing surplus acreage.

Park InfoImation

LOS (Acres per 1,000 PopUlation) Project Demand (Acres) Surplus Acreage 4.0 0.76 1,164

MAY 21,2002 [')11 L'; i-I -' " I '») , . ....... . , .... G" ,._,"1 5 '9 i 1 . • •

-31-

Concurrency S!lIIlmary

Based upon the analysis conducted, staff has determined that all concurrency-mandated facilities, including stonnwater management, roads, solid waste, parks and recreation, water, and wastewater have adequate capacity to accommodate the most intense Use of the subject property under the proposed zoning district. Therefore, the concurrency test has been satisfied for the subj ect request.

Consistency with Comprehensive Plan

RezOning requests are reviewed for consistency with all appropriate policies of the comprehensive plan. Rezonings must also be consistent with the overall designation ofland uses as depicted on the Future Land Use Map, which include agriculture, residential, recreation, conservation, and commercial and industrial land Uses and their densities. COmmercial and industrial land uses are located in nodes throughout the unincorporated areas of Indian River County.

The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies are statements in the plan which identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the basis for all county land development decisions. While alJ comprehensive plan policies are important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning requests. Of particular applicability for this request are the fOllowing objectives and policies.

Future Land Use Element Objective 1

Future Land Use Element Objective 1 states that the county wilI have a compact land Use pattern which reduces urban sprawl. By allowing the site to be developed in a manner that is consistent with the site's land use designation, the request promotes a more compact land use pattern within the urban service area and reduces the chance of urban sprawl OCCurring. F orthese reasons, the request is consistent with Future Land Use Element Objective I.

Future Land Use Element Policies 1.1 I and 1.I2

. Future Land Use Element Policy 1.12 states that the L-2, LOw-Density Residential-2, land use designation is intended for residential uses with densities up to 6 units/acre. In addition, Future Land Use Element Policy 1.11 states that these residential Uses must be located within the urban service area.

Since the subject property is located within an area designated as L-2 on the county's Future Land Use map and is located within the county's urban service area, and the proposed zoning district Would pennit residential uses no greater than the 6 units/acre permitted by the L-2 designation, the request is consistent with Policies 1.11 and 1.12.

Future Land Use Element Policy 2.2

Future Land Use Element Policy 2.2 states that the County shall encourage and direct growth into the urban service area through zoning and LDRs. Since the proposed rezoning would allow and encourage more development on the subject property, and the subject property is within the urban service area, the request implements Future Land Use Element Policy 2.2.

Future Land Use Element Objective 4

Future Land Use Element Objective 4 states that the county will reduce ~e nID?ber and length of trips on county roads. The site is located near several employment cent.ers~ rnclu~g the Vero Beach M

.. lAirp rt Dodaertown andtheSR60158thAvenuecommerclallrndustnalnode. Thatnode uruclpa 0, 0 , . '..

MAY 21,2002

-32-

is one of the county's largest employment centers. Most people who work in that node live in moderately-priced, low to medillm density housing. The RM-6 zoning district is intended for such housing. Therefore, the proposed rezoning will increase the opportunity for people who work in that node to live near their job, thus reducing the length of their trips to and from work. For this reason, the request implements Future Land Use Element Objective 4.

Transportation Element Objective 11 and Policv 11.1

Transportation Element Objective 11 and Policy 11.1 state that the county will increase densities in the urbanized area and along major transportation corridors in order to facilitate future mass transit provision. Since the proposed rezoning will increase the allowed density along and near several major transportation corridors, this request implements Transportation Element Objective I I and Policy 11.1.

Consistency Summary

- .

As part of its consistency analysis, staff compared the proposed request to all appropriate objectives and policies in the plan and found no conflicts. Therefore, staff's position is that the request is consistent with the comprehensive plan.

Compatibility with the Surrounding Area

Staff's position is that the requested zoning district is appropriate for the site and that development under this zoning district would be compatible with surrounding land uses. Because land directly to the east of the subj ect property is zoned RM -6, this request is for a continuation of an existing multiple-family residential zoning pattern.

The Walker Avenue Club apartment complex on 26 th Streetwest of the subject property is also zoned RM -6. Multiple-family and mobile home zoning and development are already prominent along both sides of 26 th Street, west of 58 th Avenue.

Consistent with the comprehensive plan, the proposed rezoning implements an incremental transition in zoning districts. This transition is accomplished by placing multiple-family districts between single-family districts and commercial/industrial districts or major roads.

Located near the SR 60/58th

Avenue commercial/industrial node (which includes the Indian River Mall), the subj ect property is particularly well suited to meet the demand for multiple-family housing generated by development within that node. In effect, the proposed rezoning would increase the opportunity for people to live near their place of employment.

Development of the subject property would be expected to have little or no impact on the Vista Plantation Condominiums to the south. That project, zoned R1VI-4, Multiple-Family Residential District (up to 4 units/acre), contains a vegetative buffer, golf course and ponds along its north boundary, which is 26 th Street.

Similarly, incompatibilities between the subject property and adjacent A-I zoned land are not anticipated. The A-I zoned land immediately to the west of the subject property is within the Urban Service Area, is designated L-2, and is expected to be eventually converted to residential uses.

With respect to zoning, the county's policy has always been to retain agricultural zoning on property located within the Urban Service Area rather than changing it when the underlying land use designation changes. This not only reflects the county's policy of using agricultural zoning within the Urban Service Area as a "holding" category, but also recognizes that urbanization occurs incrementally with various tracts remaining agricultural for longer periods.

MAY 21,2002 nil tlh I

, ; , ) nr ... f " " CO , .-•

~-,

I '.' ••

-33-

- I- I , • 0 0 0 . • I • '0

" -. Two factors, however, indicate that urban type zoning districts would be appropriate for this portion of the county. The first factor is the underlying designation on the Future Land UseMap. This area is within the urban service area and is deemed appropriate for residential development with densities of up to 6 units/acre.

Equally important is the development pattern in that portion of the county. Located near a CII node, a regional mall, Dodgertown, and Vero Beach Municipal Airport, the site is within a fast grOwing corridor. Additionally, that area has convenient access to the county's transportation system. These factors indicate a trend toward continued urbanization in that portion of the county.

For these reasons, staff feels that the requested RM-6 zoning district would be compatible with development in the surrounding area.

Potential Impact on Environmental Quality

The environmental impacts of development on the subject property are not a major concern. Being a citrus grove, the site has been altered and contains no environmentally important land, such as wetlands or sensitive uplands. For those reasons, no adverse environmental impacts associated with this request are anticipated.

CONCLUSION

Based on the analysis, staff has determined that the requested zoning district is compatible with surrounding areas, is consistent with the comprehensive plan, meets all concurrency criteria, will have no negative impacts on environmental quality, and meets all applicable rezoning criteria. Most importantly, the subject property is located in an area deemed suited for multiple-family residential uses. For these reasons, staff supports the request.

RECOMMENDATION

, Based on the analysis, the Planning and Zoning Commission and staff recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property from A-I to RM-6 by approving the attached ordinance.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Summary Page 2. Rezoning Application

3. Minutes of the March 28, 2002 meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission 4. Ordinance

MAY 21,2002 rll' , 1'-1 j~'" :r-., ,""i, ,- -" , • .' ~ .f j ->"" - .

-' t ... ,

! . - . . " , •

-34-I b 1 'I \

t • <I

t-• , '" . -" -. '- ~

" -

SUlHLV!ARY PAGE

GENERAL

Applicant: James and Lora Adamson

Location: 26th

Street approximately 400 feet west of 66th Avenue Acreage: 13.94

Land Use Designation: L-2, LOW-Density Residential-2 (up to 6 units/acres) Existing Zoning: A-I, Agricultural District (up to lunit'5 acres)

Requested Zoning: RM-6, Multiple-Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre) Existing Land Use: Citrus grove and 1 single family residence

ADJACENT LAND

North: Citrus groves zoned RS-6, Single-Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre) East: Citrus groves zoned RM-6, Multiple-Family Residential Dist. (up to 6 units/acre)

South: Multiple Family zoned Rt\1-4, Multiple-Family Residential District. (up to 4 units/acre) _ .

West: Rangeland and woodland zoned A-I, Agricultural-l District (up to I unit'5 acres)

INFRAsTRUCTURE

Water and sewer available; access from 26 th Street

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS None

PUBLIC NOTIFICATIO:::.:N~ _________ --r __________ --., Staff Contact:

Michael Brillhart

Date Advertised:

# of Surrounding Property Owner Notifications

Date Notification Mailed:

Date Sign Posted:

RECOMIHENDA TION

April 12, 2002

12

April 15, 2002

April 12,2002

Planning and Zoning Commission and staff support the request

ATTACHMENT 1

MAY 21, 2002

-35-

•• _. -+ •.

-. -.

.... . - .

Randy Deshazo

May 8, 2002

12

May 3, 2002

May 7, 2002

••

••

... -- -.

• •••

-

81{ • -," '" I~', l ........ _:""\ -1 ; " , , , ,. , I

, I " l~ ... ,

,,~j -0'

- - ') , b j • \.! M

Community Development Director Bob Keating presented the project with the aid

of a PowerPoint presentation (COpy IS ON FILE WITH THE BACKUP FOR TODA Y'S

MEETING).

The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard

regarding this matter.

Bruce Barkett, Attorney for the applicant, 756 Beachland Boulevard, stated that he

is here to answer any questions.

The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to be heard regarding this matter. There

being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing.

, .

MAY 21, 2002



adopted Ordinance 2002-020 amending the Zoning

Ordinance and the accompanying Zoning Map for

13.94 acres located on the north side of 26th Street

approximately 400 feet west of 66th Avenue from A-

1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unitlS acres) to RM-

6, Multiple-Family Residential District (up to 6

units/acre) (James and Lora Adamson).

-36-

ORDINANCE NO. 2002-020

AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR 13.94 ACRES, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 26TH STREET, APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET WEST OF 66TH AVENUE, FROM A-I, AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT (UP TO 1 UNIT/5 ACRES) TO RM-6, MUL TIPLE-F AMIL Y RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 6 UNITS/ACRE); AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE.

WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the local planning agency on

such matters, has held a public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this

rezoning request; and

WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, did

publish and send its Notice ofIntent to rezone the hereinafter described property; and

WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has detellnined that this rezoning is in

confollnance with the Comprehensive Plan ofIndian River County; and

WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has held a public hearing pursuant to this

rezoning request, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners ofIndian

River County, Florida, that the zoning of the following described property situated in Indian River

County, Florida, to-wit:

THE EAST 13.94 ACRES OF THE WEST 23.94 ACRES OF TRACT 16, SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST. ALL ACCORDING TO THE LAST GENERAL PLAT OF LANDS OF THE INDIAN RIVER FARMS COMPANY FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 25. SAID LANDS NOW LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF RECORD.

LESS AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 30' OF SOUTH 60' THEREOF, FOR ADDITIONAL ROAD RIGHT -OF-WA Y.

is changed from A-I, Agricultural District (up to 1 unitl5 acres) to RM-6, Multiple-family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre).

All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in said Land Development Regulations.

This ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State.

Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, on this 21 st day of May, 2002.

MAY 21, 2002

-37-

ORDINANCE NO. 2002-020

This ordinance was advertised in the Press-Journal on the 8 th day of May, 2002, for apublic hearing to be held on the 21" day of May, 2002, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner Ginn , seconded by Commissioner Ti pp in, and adopted by the following vote:

Chaillllan Ruth M. Stanbridge Vice-Chaillnan John W. Tippin Commissioner Fran B. Adams Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn

Aye Aye Aye

Aye Aye

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY

BY: •

Ruth M. Stanbridge, Chaillnan

ATTESTB I+- _ •

Jeffrey K. Barton,

This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the following date: _______ _

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY

William G. Collins II, Deputy County Attorney

APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS

Keating, Director

Indian River Co. Approved Date -":":""--1-

Admin.

Risk

MAY 21,2002

-38-

fill Un ~ '-'- "..-, , .? t . " I~ ./ /'

_ '"_4'

~~;, -" , , ' , " ',~

"' i • .)

9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - REVENUE DISTRIBUTION

FORMULA FOR 6¢ LOCAL OPTION GAS TAX

PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 209 OF THE INDIAN RIVER

COUNTY CODE

PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE

CLERK TO THE BOARD


TO:

FROM:

James E. Chandler, County Administrator

James W. Davis I P. E. , ..---.... ;:/ Public Works Director

SUBJECT: Public Hearing to Consider Revenue Distribution Formula for 6¢ Local Option Gas Tax

DATE: May 13, 2002


-As required by Chapter 209 of the Indian River County Code, the Board of County Commissioners shall conduct a Public Hearing in May biannually to approve a revenue distribution formula for the 6¢ Local Option Gas Tax. This tax revenue is currently shared with the five municipalities based upon a formula as follows:

"The percentage of total revenue allocated to each eligible entity equals one-third of the entity's percentage of total equivalent lane miles of road plus one-third of the entity's percentage of transportation expenditures over the previous five years plus one-third of the entity's total percentage of population residing in the area based upon the most recent estimate from the Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research."

,This formula has been used over the past fifteen years.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING

Unless the Board receives substantial municipalities, staff recommends that the retained.

objection from the existing formula be

MAY 21, 2002 1 t" ! 1" " \,0 qll ., , \ ~ . " •

L. , ' "J Ui\ , , < ' I ,;"" . '"

-39-

,-J 6

OL_,

I

CHAPTER 209. LOCAL OPTION GAS TAX

TABLE INSET: Sec. 209.01.

Sec. 209.02.

Sec. 209.03.

Sec. 209.04.

Sec. 209.05.

Section 209.01. Short title.

-+ Short tiue.

Levy of tax.

Effective date.

Disposition of proceeds.

Utilization of proceeds.

This article shall be known and may be cites as the "Indian River County Local Option Gas Tax Ordinance."

(Ord. No. 92-26, § 4, 7-14-92)

Section 209.02. Levy of tax.

There is hereby imposed a six cent ($0.06) local option gas tax upon every gallon of motor fuel and special fuel sold in Indian River County and taxed under the provisions of F:.S. Ch.206. .

(Ord. No. 92-26, § 4, 7-14-92)

Section 209.03. Effective date.

The tax imposition hereby made shall be effective from September 1, 1996 to August 31, 2026, both inclusive.

(Ord. No. 92-26, § 4, 7-14-92; Ord. No. 96-11, § 1,4-23-96)

Section 209.04. Disposition of proceeds.

(a) The disposition of proceeds shall be pursuant to inter/ocal agreement with one or more of the municipalities located therein, representing a majority of the population of the incorporated area within the county. Said agreement shall provide a distribution formula for dividing the entire proceeds of the local option gas tax among the county government . and all eligible municipalities within the county. Said formula is set forth in paragraph (b) of this section. The method of distribution of the local option gas tax revenues shall be reviewed and a public hearing held in May at least every two (2) years by the parties to the agreement.

(b) Each year, during the term of the imposition of this tax, the division and distribution of tax proceeds under this article shall be evaluated and recalculated based upon the following formula:

The percentage of total revenue allocated to each eligible entity equals one-third (1/3) of

the entity's percentage of total equivalent lane miles of road plus one-third (1/3) of the

entity's percentage of transportation expenditures over the previous five (5) years plus

MAY 21,2002 Ril ; ,"', r"' '" ,~. , • • r (j , , . , • • .

• • ,~ • . -, h (] ! . .' . '\ • ' . • V ~i • • • . •

"'''' ~" .. " -

-40-

one-third (1/3) of the entity's total percentage of population residing in the area based

upon the most recent estimate from the Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research.

Each eligible entity (municipality) shall report the above information to the Indian River County Public Works Director by April 30th of each year. Should the above information not be reported to the public works director by April 30th of each year, the public works director shall recalculate the distribution of proceeds based upon the previous year's information, or other reliable information, whichever is more recent, for each non-reporting eligible entity (municipality).

By June 15 of each year, the county shall provide the Florida State Department of Revenue a certified copy of the distribution proportions established by interlocal agreement under this section. The revised distribution of tax proceeds shall become effective on September 1 of the same year.

(c) If, during the term of the imposition of this tax, the county or any of the municipalities become ineligible to receive a share of the local option gas tax for ahy reason, any funds otherwise undistributed because of ineligibility shall be distributed by the department of revenue to eligible governments within Indian River County in proportion to other monies distributed pursuant to this section.

(d) The distribution formula established herein shall also govern the division and distribution of proceeds of the local option gas tax imposed through August 31, but not collected otherwise available for distribution until after August 31, of the year this levy terminates.

(Ord. No. 92-26, § 4,7-14-92; Ord. No. 96-11, § 1,4-23-96; Ord. No. 2001-012, § 1, 3-20-01)

Section 209.05. Utilization of proceeds.

Proceeds of the tax imposed herein shall be utilized only for transportation expenditures in accordance with the provisions and requirements of F.S. § 336.025.

(Ord. No. 92-26, § 4,7-14-92)

Public Works Director Jim Davis reviewed the recommendation for the Board and

also asked for authorization for staff to transmit the Table on Page 100 of the backup, to

become effective September 1, 2002, to the State of Florida, Department of Revenue:

MAY 21,2002

-41-

01/ Un .j •

. ;)' , . ,

I +::-. N I

-n \, "":;.. -..." .... ...... -,'-

..............

~", '';1 . ,-i"-~ "~

~ ~'"I-..i

- '<, , .. ,," '",,-,

;~,~J

-., , .- ' ~ -.. _,J' j

.... ,· .. ,,-1 t"~' ,,-~..,

' ... _J

~ N .. N o o N

ITEM

# Lane Miles # Bridges

INDIAN RIVER COUNTY

1348.20 71

Equiv. Lane 1490.2 Equlv. Lane =(#Lane Miles)+(2)(#Bridges)70.31 17%

Transportation Expenditures

2000/01

99/2000

98/99

97/98

96/97

Sub-Total Average

POPULATION (2001)

POPULA nON %

$ 13,408736

$ 13,415,177

$ 18,700,809

$ 16,813,930

$ 11,892,662

$74,231,314 68.5016%

73,458

63.4813%

REVENUE PERCENTAGE 67.4315% (PROPOSED FOR 2002/2003)

EXISTING PERCENTAGE 67.6584% (2001/2002)

. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LOCAL OPTION GAS TAX DISTRIBUTION FORMULA

APRIL,2002

VEROBEACH

244.1 8

260.1 12.2722%

$ 2,828,633

$ 3,060,822

$ 2.593,326

$ 2,112,079

$ 2,239,959

$12,834,819 11.8441 %

17,879

15.4508%

13.1890%

13.2839%

FELLSMERE

54 0

54 2.5479%

$ 816,799

$ 638,440

$ 780,932

$ 998,476

$ 899,467

$4,134,114 3.8150%

3,901

3.3712%

3.2447%

3.1286%

SEBASTIAN

299.4 5

309.4 . 14.5983%

$ 3,344,936

$ 4,099,107

$ 4,764,437

$ 1,964,948

$ 2,699,028

$16,872,456 15.5701 %

16,796

14.5148%

14.8944%

14.6816%

ORCHID

0 0

0 0.00%

No figures

$0 0%

161

0.1391%

.0464%

.0413%

INDIAN RIVER TOTAL SHORES

5.72 0

5.72 00.2699%

$ 48,840

$ 59,725

$ 53,761

$ 39,808

$ 89,574

$ 291,708 0.2692%

3,521

3.0428%

1.1940

1.2062%

2119.42 100%

$108,364,411 100%

115,716

100%

100%

100%

Distribution Formula Is equal 10 onc:~lhird of the: entity's percentage: oftolai equivalent lane miles of road plus one-third afthe entity's percentage of transportation expenditures over the previous S years, plus one-third of the entity's IOlalpercentagc: of pop lui ali on

based upon most recent estimate from Florida Bureau of Economic and BusineS! Research

LOOT02

The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in

this matter. There being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing.



approved retaining the existing formula and

authorized staff to forward the Table to the State of

Florida, Department of Revenue, as recommended

by staff.

9.C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC

HEARING JUNE 4, 2002 - ANTHONY J. SCIACCOTTA

RE UEST FOR ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF 84TH

TE CE RIGHT-OF-WAY SOUTH OF 22ND STREET

WITHIN PARADISE PARK (Legislative)


MAY 21, 2002 8'/ , ')~' ~ r ' ,.), , 'f' , ,

¥ ,~,- " .. .' r' 'i1 JI\ l h ... " ... ; '-'

-43-

TO: James E. Chandler· County Administrator

HEAD

FROM:

Community Development

.4· I). Stan Boling, AICP Planning Director

THROUGH: John W. McCoy, AICP ~W M Senior Planner, Current Development

DATE: May 14,2002

SUBJECT: Notice of Scheduled Public Hearing for Upcoming Board Meeting

It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration.by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of May 21 st, 2002.

DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:

Please be advised that the following public hearing has been scheduled for Board consideration, as follows:

June 4th, 2002 Meeting

1. Anthony 1. Sciaccotta's request for an abandonment of a portion of 84th Terrace right-of-way south of 22

nd Street within 'Paradise Park. [Legislative]

RECOMMENDATION:

The above referenced public hearing date is provided for the Board's information. No action is needed.

NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN.

MAY 21, 2002

-44-

10. EXTENSION OF 1¢ LOCAL OPTION SALES TAX FY 2004/05

THROUGH FY 2019/20


To: Members of the Board

Through:

From:

Date:

SUbject:

Description:

of County Commissioners

James E.Chandler County Administra

Joseph A. Baird Assistant County A Jason E. Brown Budget Manager

May 15, 2002

Extension of Local Option Sales Tax FY 2004/05 through FY 2019/20

Chapter 212 of the Florida Statutes permits County residents to vote upon, and impose additional taxes upon themselves in order to raise monies for any number of purposes, as predefined by law. For several years now, Indian River County has had such a 'discretionary surtax' in place. Commonly known as the "Local Option Sales Tax' or, more fOllnally, the 'Local Government Infrastructure Surtax," this one cent sales tax was first approved by the voters in 1989 for funding certain critical capital projects at that time. For example, county roads were upgraded to come into compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. The new Courthouse, the Indian River County Jail and the new Health Department building were all constructed using Optional Sales Tax funds.

The tax was approved for a telm of fifteen years. During this time, the Optional Sales Tax has made possible such current projects as building expansions at both the Main and North County Libraries; and continued improvement and upgrading of the County's road system through paving, bridge repair and construction of new sidewalks and bike paths.

Major road projects have also been made possible by this tax. Currently, 58th Avenue, a major north-south conduit, is being widened to four lanes from Route 60 to Oslo Road, to better accommodate the markedly increased traffic caused by a population increase in the County. Old bridges leading to this road are also being replaced in an effort to enhance traffic flow coming from major streets leading to 58th Avenue.

MAY 21, 2002 S,!l j '\ . ,

.~

" " ! (' s ) -'-'; i _ " • \..-: I 1- '''' .. •

-45-

• -'';I ")

/ ~ • • • V ._'

An expanding population needs increased safety and health services. With that in mind, sales tax funds have been used to construct additional fire stations, as well as expand existing fire stations to accommodate new Advanced Life Support (ALS) services. A new Health Depru tment dental clinic was recently under construction. The Sheriffs Deprutment has used sales tax funds for a much needed security retrofit at the Indian River County Jail.

The tax also made it possible to expand recreational offerings to our residents by construction of entirely new parks, such as the North County, South County and Round Island Parks, as well as " improvements at Donald McDonald and Wabasso Causeway Parks. The Gifford Aquatic Center, a new state of the art swimming facility completed in just the past year, was partially funded by this tax, and partially funded by private contributions coordinated by the Gifford Progressive Civic League.

The original referendum approved the Optional Sales Tax through May 31, 2004. In order to continue receiving funding from this source, the Board must approve an ordinance calling for a Countywide referendum set before the voters during the November 2002 general election. The purpose of this agenda item is to illustrate the advantages of this tax and to urge passage of an ordinance allowing the tax to continue for an additional 16 years.

Discussion:

The Optional Sales Tax offers a number of advantages over the traditional ad valorem (property) tax, as described below:

1. Everyone pays-not just the property owners: Our popUlation swells significantly with part-time residents and tourists during the winter months. County roads and other infrastructure are built for peak demand. Visitors use the SaIne libraries, roads and parks as our permanent residents. Yet because of their 'nonpermanent' status, they do not 'pay' for their construction or use as our property owners do.

Pursuant to Section 212.054(2)(a), Florida Statutes, the tax " ... shall be a discretionary surtax on all transactions occurring in the county which transactions are subject to the state tax imposed on sales, use, services, rentals, admissions and other transactions by this chapter and communications services as defined for the purposes of Chapter 202." Clearly, anybody visiting here for any length of time will be highly likely to 'use' or 'purchase' a service which will have the tax imposed on it.

2. "Essentials" -Food and Medicine are not taxed: Any extra tax, even a small one, can place undue hardship on people with limited economic resources. The tax exempts most purchases of food and medicine, just as these purchases are exempt from state taxes. Rather, the tax is on 'non-essential' transactions, in essence, those that might be considered above the basic survival needs of an individual.

3. Health of the local economy is preserved: Large transactions such as car and boat sales are important to the economic health of the County. The local option sales tax cannot be collected on sales aInounts above $5,000 on any item of tangible personal property-thus capping the maximum aInount of additional sales tax collectible on this type of transaction at $50.

4. Money is eruIllarked for specific projects: In accordance with Florida Statutes, the Optional Sales Tax cannot be used for governmental operating expenses. A schedule detailing proposed projects for the first five year period of the levy-discussed in more detail later in this agenda item- does show operating expenditures associated with these projects but this category is for information only. Only capital expenditures associated with a project may be expended from Optional Sales Tax funds.

MAY 21, 2002 DlJ

, ,~ ; ... ~ ..... . ' . f""~) \ ,l , , • • • '.~ - ;. ""-LEI • • " , j1 , , , , "-' • • • .-. " "

-46-7

•

• • I ! ifd· ,

5. Reduces the burden of impact and user fees on building contractors and homeowners when a service must be provided under the County's Comprehensive Plan.

6. Debt burden is reduced: A steady stream of revenue for capital projects reduces the need to rely upon outside debt as a funding source, as well as the resultant interest expenses incurred. Generally, bond issues and other forms of debt, and their issuance and borrowing costs, often increase property taxes or impact revenue streams which are needed for the County's operating expenses. Certainly any way that the County can realistically reduce reliance upon outside debt as a revenue source is desirable.

7. Cities and County Share Revenue: The sales tax is not just received by the County. All municipalities receive a proportionate share of the sales tax for their infrastructure needs. The distribution is based upon the formula established in Chapter 218.62, Florida Statutes.

Future Capital Projects-Prioritization of Projects

As stated earlier, the original voter referendum only extended the Local Option One Cent Sales Tax until 2004. As the popUlation of our County continues to increase, the sales tax will prove an advantageous way to fund the necessary projects and services that our expanded populace will require for its safety and well-being.

Recently, the County Administrator's Office asked the Departments to analyze the County's infrastructure needs over the corning years and submit proposals from their perspective. When this analysis was complete, projects totaling over $150 million in combined capital expenditures were submitted for the Administrator's review. This office then reviewed and rated these projects according to urgency.

Of the over $150 million in capital requests originally submitted, only $61 million in revenues are available in the first frve years to fund the submitted projects. Projects considered having the highest priority were included for funding in this first five year period. Some of the less critical projects will be considered for funding in the second or third five year periods in the context of the County's infrastructure needs in that future time.

A preliminary schedule of proposed projects for the first five year period, October 1 S\ 2004-September 30th

, 2009 is on file in the BCC office. This schedule provides a brief description of each project and its originating department, as well as estimated construction costs and operating expenses over this five year period (Operating expenditures are not funded by this tax, and are included for information purposes only).

Larger Projects under consideration for the period October 1, 2004-September 30, 2009

Highlighted below is a tentative list of some of the larger projects under consideration in the 2004-2009 period. This is by no means a fmal list, rather it is submitted merely for discussion purposes.

1. More people bring more vehicles, and so road and bridge projects remain a high priority. The 43rd Avenue corridor is slated for expansion to 4 lanes from 8th to 26th Streets, to address increasing traffic congestion and accidents in that area ($2,000,000). Bridges at the Lateral A Canal, east of 66 th Avenue are in critical need of repair ($5,000,000). In the North County, residents there can benefit from left tum lane improvements at the intersections of a number of streets and heavily traveled 58 th Avenue (estimated cost, $900,000), and a proposed four lane widening of County Road 512 ($1,000,000). In total, $19,400,000 will be needed from Optional Sales Tax for road improvement projects over the next five years.

MAY 21, 2002 R"\ .J, \ ;~

-47-

2. A proposed expansion of the Indian River County jail to include a 240 person mediwn security unit (cost estimate: $11,317,000 before operating expenditures) is a

3.

4.

5.

6.

necessary project given the continued growth in population.

A proposed library branch -with an estimated cost of construction of $6,680,000

Two new fire/paramedic stations-estimated cost to purchase land and build the stations$3,337,443

StOlIllwater projects such as those planned for Vero Lake Estates help preserve the Indian River Lagoon by reducing pollution runoff (estimated cost $2,000,000).

Many tourists from throughout the world come to Vero Beach specifically to visit our . beautiful beaches. Renourishment projects have been proposed to battle erosion problems our area beaches have experienced.

Conclusion and Recommendations:

It is important to emphasize that these projects will become necessary regardless of whether the Optional Sales Tax is extended. If the Optional Sales Tax is not approved, projects such as those listed above will need to be funded from other sources, which would have a substantial impact on ad valorem (property) taxes.

Resolutions supporting an extension of the one-cent sales tax for 15 years have already been adopted by all municipalities within the County (the Cities of Vero Beach, Sebastian and Fellsmere as well as the Towns of Indian River Shores and Orchid). These municipalities also benefit from the tax as they receive a proportionate share of any monies the County receives for their infrastructure needs as well.

Given the clear advantages that the Local Option Sales Tax will provide to Indian River County, we recommend that the Board:

1.

2.

Review the list of proposed capital projects forwarded by the County Administrator to be included in the first five year plan. It must be emphasized again that the schedule is merely preliminary. There are many more worthy projects that warrant immediate funding then there will be available dollars for, making any decisions as to their inclusion or exclusion during the first five year period extremely difficult. The list is presented for discussion and input purposes in order to arrive at a final proposal.

Approve the creation of an ordinance calling for a countywide referendum during the November General Election, to be held November 5th, 2002 (Staff will be presenting this ordinance for fOlIllal approval by the Board in June).

3. Staff also recommends that the Local Option Sales Tax be approved for a period of 16 years. Per law the tax must be levied on a calendar year basis, which we propose should begin January 1St, 2004 and end December 31, 2019 (This would avoid gaps from the end of the prior levy-May 31st, 2004, to January 1st

, 2005, the beginning of the current one). We believe that this extended period will allow for better long range planning of the County's and its municipalities' capital funding needs.

MAY 21, 2002 I'" ..-., r h I ,'j •. J .....,.

-48-

- - .-~, - '

-' ,- -, ; ,

- - ',-'-; , ," --- .'

,- -- >, , - , , - -, '" -, '- --,,-'-'-': .' '.

,'<':{;', - - "-

, - , " " , ", , .>-

:- '. - >0,',' --- '- -

,-'" '-,.-','; . " , - - ". --

, , ". --', ', . " . -. '- - .,." -....... ".'-,",

'-', "<"-~,:,;--/

- - ", ..

,- -, ',':->;,----,~ .. - .,'. "

'" '-,

,,' ;"-'-"

•

",.'"" . , ,-',,' , _ -, _ i_

. :..' ,. ..

Assistant County Administrator Joe Baird stated that this program was first approved

in 1989 for a period of 15 years which expires May 31, 2004. These taxes have funded

many critical infrastructure projects such as the new jail, the new courthouse, the health

department, roads, bridges, fire stations, park improvements, and expansion of the libraries.

There are many advantages to this tax over other revenue streams in that everyone pays; it

preserves the health of the economy; it reduces impact fees; and it funds projects without the

necessity of issuing debt. For fiscal year 2001-02 the revenue estimates are $16,100,000;

$11,000,000 to the County; $438,000 to the City of Fellsmere; $396,000 to the Town of

Indian River Shores; $16,000 to the Town of Orchid; $1,859,000 to the City of Sebastian;

and $2,000,000 to the City of Vero Beach.

Mr. Baird continued that he had asked for each department's infrastructure needs and

the total cost of those requests was in excess of $150,000,000. There were many important

projects with merit but some had to be excluded. The proposed projects are submitted as

follows for consideration:

OPTIOt..",L SALES TAX PROGRAM FOR FIRST FI\.= YEARS Proposed Projects - October 1, 2004 to September 30, 2009 •

Year 5th October 1. 2004 to October 1. 2005 to October 1. 2006 to October 1. 2007 to October 1. 2008 to

f--------- _=:::..= 2005

Revenues:

FOlWard $0 $0

Optional Sales Tax $11,500,000 $11,615,000

Interest Income $575,000 $560,000

Expend itures:

,Administration Building $4,500,000 $1,500,000 Beach Restoration Projects $0 $0 Emergency Services $500,000 $2,292,738 General Services - Buildings $0 $0 Library Projects $0 $0 Parks & Recreation Projects $600,000 $0 Public Works $0 $0 Road Improvements $1,150,000 $30150,000 Sheriffs Department $4,158,400 $5,658,400 Stormwater Projects $400,000 $400,000 S.W.D.D. - Landfill Projects $735,000 $418,000

$355,000 $80,000 Reserve for Contingencies $250,000 $250,000

$0

$11,731,150

$550,000

$0 $0

$1,600,000 $0 $0

$2,900,000 $100,000

$5,240,000 $1,500,000

$400,000 $160,000 $80,000

$300,000

$0

$11,848,462

$475,000

$0 $75,000

$0 $0

$3,340,000 $1,050,000

$900,000 $4,710,000

$0 $400,000 $160,000 $190,000 $450,000

$0

$11,941,947

$425,000

$0 $2,000,000 $1,144,705

$430,456 $3,340,000

$0 $0

$3,050,000 $0

$400,000 $160,000 $190,000 $553,860

TOTAl

$0

$58,636,559

$2.585,000

$6,000,000 $2,075,000 $5,537,443

$430,456 $6,680,000 $4,550,000 $1,000,000

$17,300,000 $11,316,800

$2,000,000 $1,633,000

$895,000 $1,803,860

MAY 21, 2002 BII\ I I rG G 7 7

-49-

" - ,- ~-

'j- ~: : ,,-.,¥.;

" ,,," « , ;- ,', ,,< ,-' -~-" -,,' , ',,, '.}'

, , " -" -

::- ;.-.'- .

-- .. - - " ,,, , -_.',

, ',', :.-_,,' ;'" -

- -',,' - - '~'-- ;._>

, - ",' -' ','. -,

, :,' \, - ~-,

- -'';-'''.->',' . - '- . "" -c:

','-. ,,-, '

, "'-

, -- ,. . - . - -,' -

, ,,," _" _0

--'- -, ,-""-'"

'-- ' -" '.-

, ,'-', -:',", ;," ", ." -

" '''-

:'.-'~--'-::"

,-', ': '

, ' - - '--,

, '. ",,,

" ,,',-

-, ' -'-, -: ,: >----,~ ;. '< ,"

- -" -. - :;

Mr. Baird stated that staff is asking the Board to (1) review the projects list and make

recommendations; (2) approve a Countywide referendum on November 5, 2002; and (3)

approve the program for 16 years instead of 15 years to overlap the current program which

expires May 31,2004. The new program would go into effect on January 1 st, 2004 to avoid

a 7-month period with no revenue coming in. The Department of Revenue has changed the

law so that these programs must now all begin on January pt.

Commissioner Ginn felt the proposed project list was well done and wanted the

public to be aware that without this additional funding the library projects and many road

improvements would not have been possible. Our County is ahead of most of South Florida

because of planning done in 1999 by the Regional Planning Council. She stated that she has

a resolution in support of the program from each of the municipalities involved. (COPIES

OF RESOLUTIONS ARE ON FILE WITH THE BACKUP TO TODA Y'S MEETING).

She also pointed out that operating costs for each of these proposed projects would be new

and hoped that the County would continue to review this program every 5 years.

Chairman Stanbridge noted that this is not a public hearing but she would allow

public comment.

Frank Coffey, 5015 Fairways Drive, pointed out the program could have an effect

on ad valorem taxes because of the operating expenditures.

Mr. Baird responded that without the program, the County would have to bridge the

revenue source and pay debt service expenses as well as operating costs.

Commissioner Macht commented that all the proposed projects are predicated on

growth and ad valorem revenues would increase proportionately.

MAY 21,2002

-50-

, , -, -' - ," , , "- ,'-

. - ',.' -, -;"

" ,' .. , ,,::,' -,

"- ,- ~ : -'.

, - , -, '

'-, .- ",

. . , . " "',

, - - -", ' . - . "

-' -', -,' '. '- ,

" -/.

, - -, -"-' , ,,; , -, '.

- ': '-;, , , , ,'" , ' " • - r.,'

, , " ,

, -- ,"-

-" ,"'. . - _ L.

,

" . " '

, .,,' -, , ' , ' -' ',' ---.

, --" ,

" -', ," ','

,

, ,-. -

-. ,-" - '," " , -,

, " ., -

" ,- '.-~ - - '

"-;'~"

"

-, ,,'-"', ' ,

-', '. ',_ ;,0

" " -" - " .

,

,

" -:j", ; " .-' ,

Commissioner Adams felt that the most important asset ofthe program is that it is not

just the burden of the property owners, but everyone pays. This is still very much a

residential community and it is a good thing to have everyone participate. This is the fairest

of all ways to provide for expansion and infrastructure growth.

Commissioner Ginn questioned how much of this revenue would come from out-of

County people, and Mr. Baird responded that up to 40% comes from that source.

Mayor Walter Barnes, City of Sebastian, felt this is an ideal way to finance public

projects.

Mayor Joel Tyson, City of Fellsmere, stated that his City would not exist without this

program and emphasized its importance.

Rene Renzi, 340 Waverly Place, questioned whether the income from out -of-county

prisoners at the jail is still coming in, and Mr. Baird stated that revenue has dropped

considerably. The new jail will be needed by 2006 due to the population increase pursuant

to State requirements. If the additional jail space is not made available, we would have to

pay another county to take our overflow prison population.

Commissioner Macht commented that this would not be a new jail but an extension

to the existing jail.

Ms. Renzi then questioned the amount for libraries, and Mr. Baird stated that amount

would be necessary for the proposed west or south county branch.

Commissioner Macht noted that in spite of the construction work, patronage at the

North County Library went up last month by 6,000 units. Their main computer bank has a

waiting line of 6 to 7 people. A larger branch will probably be needed in south county.

MAY 21,2002 Bl{ I -51-

",', , '- ': <:-' , , --

-- _,' ,0'_; >:',_

, /.- .'.

,-" '. ~"

" , "

,-~-c/ _ -, ~" ' -

<

- -.':: -'

,,' '. -

; -'

, " , " ' - : < < <

-,' -'. '

" \ :

, -, ,,' - '

, -",','".:' .. ' .-,-' , , , ",:,- - , '

',' -;

'-, ' -, ' ,

< <

-~ -- :'"

'." ''o,

, '-".->',,'-

;' , ' .- ,.-, ,,' < < <

, .',

'-" " ,-'

" , '

- " ,- '.' , '

< < <

.' "-,,.' .' , - ,', , ,: '

, , " <

< <

, " ,

, .. ' ~ - '

',-' -'~, --,'-<: ' ' -, : ,',' ,',

- , '.

-.' ';. , ' -"« ««<

, , ",

',-, -,-, ',,' ',: > "

, ,',

; -, ,-

, , " " - '.

« <

., ,-

, ", - ' -

, ,,' ,

, -: , - ", ' " "<-;" --,

< < "

, '. ,,'-, "

.:',,-;,

, " , '. -,. ,--

, - ' ",'--, _.

. ,

Commissioner Macht noted that the income from out-of-county prisoners comes

totally from the federal government.

Mr. Baird commented that the best revenue source is from housing federal prisoners.

Commissioner Adams noted that staff s recommendation is for authorization to go

to a referendum vote. These projects are anticipated but not set in stone.

Commissioner Ginn wanted to include the requirement to reprioritize the projects

every 5 years with a public hearing.

Commissioner Macht felt that Items 1 through 7 in staffs Memorandum, entitled

"Discussion", would be the best and most concise illustration of the proposal to be in the

information to be presented to the public.

County Administrator Jim Chandler commended Assistant County Administrator Joe

Baird and Budget Manager Jason Brown for their work on this project.

MAY 21,2002

ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht,

SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board

unanimously approved: (1) the list of proposed

capital projects to be included in the first five-year

plan, (2) the creation of an ordinance calling for a

countywide referendum during the November

General Election, to be held November 5th, 2002 (to

be submitted to the Board for approval in June,

2002); and (3) the 1 ¢ Local Option Sales Tax for a

period of 16 years to begin January 1 S\ 2004 and end

December 3 rs\ 2019, all as recommended by staff.

-52-

, "- '

- :.- --: '

. -/.' "

,-' , -

,- "

. . . .

" , ,- i

~' "' .

-.' \ '

- - :-

, " ---

',- .,',.

',- ' -

. . .

,- - "

, , -- -

, -, --. .

, -,' .,'

,- , '-

, ' " , ' . - " "

, - - ' -", --~

, '. ',-

- ",

,- ,- -'

.. .

" '.'" - -, '

, ,,-

, " -' -,

"- , '-

- ,--

I1.C.l.

COPIES OF MUNICIPAL RESOLUTIONS IN SUPPORT OF

THE CONTINUATION OF THE LOCAL OPTION ONE-CENT

SALES TAX ARE ON FILE FROM VERO BEACH, ORCHID,

SEBASTIAN, FELLSMERE AND INDIAN RIVER SHORES

COUNTY LIBRARY FACILITIES - RENTAL FEES FOR

USE OF VARIOUS MEETING ROOMS


Date: May 14,2002

To: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners

Thru: James E. Chandler, County Administrator

From: Thomas 'V. Frame, General Services Director ' ..((",,4-uJ .r;}<4<. ... - .. '---___ .

Subject: Rental Fees for Use of various Meeting Rooms at County Library Facilities

BACKGROUND: Within the next several weeks, the two libraries will again be able to provide meeting rooms to the various members of the general public. These library additions have increilsed the size of certain meeting rooms and in some case even created additional rooms not available before.

Currently, the multi-purpose meeting room in the Main Library has an established fee of $20.00 per meeting, and the North County Library multi-purpose meeting room has as established fee of $10.00. If the meeting were library sponsored meetings, there was no fee. Additionally, there were no charges for the use of conference rooms or study/typing rooms. Those fees were established by the Board's adoption of the Indian River County Library System Policy and Procedures Manual on July 16, 1991.

The attached memorandum from Mary Powell, Director of Library Services, outlines suggested

meeting room fees.

Staff would like to propose an interim fee schedule that would be charged as follows:

MAY 21, 2002

-53-

j. ,r dl 81 •

"

, ---, ,- -

- " ! ,"

, " '

, " '-- -

/ -',,'

. .

, , ',' '.' '

, , '

'" ' -" .<

- '. , -

. North County Library

L Large (Multi-purpose) Room • Non-Commercial Use • Commercial Use

2. Study Rooms

Main Library

1. Large (Multi-purpose) Room • Non-Commercial Use • Commercial Use

2. 40-50 Seat Meeting Room

• Non-Commercial Use • Commercial Use

3. Study Rooms 4. Small Classroom/meeting rooms

Full Day

$40.00 $100.00

$40.00 $100.00

$20.00 $50.00

No Charge

No Charge No Charge

Half Day

$20.00 $50.00

$20.00 $50.00

No Charge $25.00

With the adoption of these fees or similar fees, ultimately, charges for such things as a twentyfive cent reserve fee could be deleted. This would also provide for an alternate revenue source should a "State-wide" library card become a reality.

The Indian River County Library System Policy and Procedures Manual is approximately eleven years old and needs to be updated .. It is anticipated that upon completion of the library expansion currently underway, staff would be able to review and make recommendations relative to any

. changes that should be included including a permanent fee schedule for the use of meeting rooms. Staff shall have a draft of those proposed modified policy and procedures to the Board

. no later than October 1,2002.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the fees, as proposed above, be approved as interim rates to be charged until the adoption of a amended Policy and Procedures Manual by October 1, 2002.

MAY 21, 2002

MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams,

SECONDED by Commissioner Macht to approve

staff's recommendation.

BX -54-

General Services Director Tom Frame stated that the proposed fees have been

presented to the Public Library Advisory Board, which concurred with the proposed fees.

He then asked that the recommendation be amended to include the waiver of the 25¢ book

reserve fee.

MOTION WAS AMENDED by Commissioner

Adams to include waiver of the 25¢ book reserve

fee, SECONDED by Commissioner Macht.

Commissioner Ginn was concerned about the cost to a lot of non-profits which use

these rooms.

Director Frame pointed out the differing rates proposed for commercial and non

commercial use and stated that the intent is to make the prices competitive and cost

effective.

Commissioner Ginn felt that the Library is supported with tax money and most of the

. non-profits provide services to the general pUblic.

Commissioner Macht agreed that these non-profit participants also pay taxes and raise

funds to provide their services. He could not support adding another burden.

Commissioner Adams noted that there are costs to clean and maintain the rooms and

felt there should be some charge.

Director Frame noted that these proposed fees would be in effect from now until

October 1 st when staff will come back with a proposed manual which can include any

modifications.

MAY 21,2002

-55-

Oil Ul\

! • , •

1'"1: A· ..... , ,. c . I

~--'''''

.-- - ."", " n '? I .} i . '.

0 • J : \.1 . J -

-' ' .

- - ,

Commissioner Adams noted that these fees will replace revenue from some other

charges which will be abolished.

Commissioner Ginn was not in favor of raising the rates and preferred to hold off

until the proposed manual could be presented in October.

. .

11.C.2.

THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and

the Motion passed by a 4-1 vote (Commissioner

Ginn opposed). (Approved the interim rates to be

charged until the adoption of an Amended Indian

River County Library System Policy and Procedures

Manual by October 1, 2002, as recommended by

staff, and waived the 25¢ book deposit fee effective

immediately. )

HEALTH DEPARTMENT AND JAIL ROOFING DESIGN

SERVICES - RESCIND R. L. REEGER CONTRACT -

APPROVE EDLUND DRITENBAS CONTRACT


Date: May 14, 2002



From: Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director (

Subject: RoorIng Design Services

BACKGROUND: •

On April 23, 2002, the Board of County Commissioners approved an agreement to utilize the services of R.L. Reeger, an architect and roofing consultant via a Lake County School Board

MAY 21, 2002

-56-

.. .

. . - - ,

"'-. - - , ' ' ",""'i' . .

Contract for the design of the re-roofrng of the Health Department and County Jail. After additional review, staff has determined that it is not in the interest of Indian River County to pursue that approach. Therefore, the Board is being requested to rescind that action. . _ .

Currently, two roofrng projects have been budgeted for within this frscal year. The fust is the reroofrng of the Health Department building for $75,000. The second project is the re-roofrng of Phase 1 of the Indian River County Jail for $112,000. Presently under Florida Statutes (Section 287.055, F.S.), the Consultant's Competitive Competition Act requires a Request for Qualifrcations (RFQ) if the project construction costs exceeds $250,000. Since neither project exceeds that amount nor does the cumulative total, the requirement for the formal RFQ is not statutorily required. The County's Purchasing Code (Section 105.05) stipulates compliance with Section 287.055 or as it may be amended. Further, the purchasing code specifres Board approval for any service over $5,000 (Section 105.02).

Currently, we have asked the architectural fum, Edlund Dritenbas, the designers ofth.e dental clinic addition to the Health Department to review the issue of including the re-roofrng of the Health Department as a potential added service to that project. It seemed the most effective alternative since we are coordinating the construction of a roofed area in conjunction with the dental clinic addition.

Subsequently, I have asked the fum to consider the design for the re-roofrng associated with the County Jail. Again, since the architect has already been selected through a CCNA (Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act) process for earlier designs such as the North County Library and the Dental Clinic Addition, it appears to be the most effrcient way to proceed for both the Health Department roof and Jail roof. Since the projects are not bound by the requirements of Section 287.055, F.S., the Board would have to approve the use of the architect before further activity could proceed.

REC01VThIENDATION: '. d ·S -""f d that the Board rescind its action of Apnl 23, 2002 relatrve to the propose t.il" recommen s . " 'th Edl d tr t 'th R L Reeaer Secondly authorize staff to proceed WIth negotIatIOns WI un con ac WI " ",', '. . . a b k D 't b Architects for the re-roofrng design and servIces WIth the staff bnngm", ac an n en as, , . d appropriate contract for the Board's approval if successfully negotrate .

General Services Director Tom Frame noted that these are both large roofs and some

consultant was obtained through piggybacking a Lake County School System contract which

has a technical and/or legal problem. Staff feels it would be best to rescind that contract and

go with the Dritenbas firm but is only requesting authorization to negotiate a contract.

MAY 21,2002

-57-B!( ii,

, t' ~ ~--. f l l , C .. ,:... ..

, ""-

-', "



unanimously rescinded its action of April 23, 2002

relative to the proposed contract with R. L. Reeger

and authorized staff to proceed with negotiations

with Edlund Dritenbas, Architects, for the re-roofing

design and services with the understanding that staff

will bring back an appropriate contract for the

Board's approval, if successfully negotiated, as


I1.C.3. SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS - MODULAR OFFICE _

CHANGE ORDER - G. E. CAPITAL MODULAR SPACE


Date: May 15, 2002



From: Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director ~

Subject: Supervisor of Elections Office Space, Change Order # 1

BACKGROUND: On April 23, 2002, the Board of County Commissioners approved the lease agreement with G.E. Capital Modular Space for a monthly charge of $5,894 ($70,728 annually).

Recently, after review of the detailed specifications, the front doors were found to be unacceptable since they were solid core metal doors with a 10-inch square window opening. In discussing this with the Supervisor of Elections, it was determined that French doors would be more functional and provide a more aesthetic appearance.

MAY 21, 2002 81( : r~· ,r"'", -,., -- () r J "

j '. •

{) , , l..r' j 'l k ... I • 0 - c' o j ,

- '. ~ • <- , - , '- " -58-

'. ' -" - '- ,,, "

, , , ,

., " " . .- - ,-. ,

- - - ,', - .'., - .

Contact was made with G.E. Capitol and we were advised that French doors could be added but it would increase the monthly rental by $70.00 per month. In order to stay on schedule, it is requested that the Board approve this additional change. This will bring the monthly charge to $5,964 per month and establish an annual cost of $71,568.

RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that in order to provide a more acceptable door, that the change order be approved by the Board authorizing an additional $70.00 per month in lease charges.

Commissioner Adams expressed her frustration that this project is getting out of

control. Almost every week another change is being presented.

General Services Director Tom Frame stated that the extra expense is to comply with

the required additional wind loads.

Commissioner Ginn commented that this change involves some safety issues. The

regular door only had a small glass pane and she, as well as the Supervisor of Elections, had

understood that the french doors were included in the original estimate.

Commissioner Adams noted that when the talks first began about the new voting

machines, there was no expectation that the whole Elections Office would have to be moved.

She was concerned that the project was getting totally "out of hand" and wondered when it

would stop.

Commissioner Macht commented that this is another unfunded State mandate.

Director Frame noted that the modular unit has been ordered and is in the process of

being manufactured.

MAY 21,2002


SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board, by

a 4-1 vote (Commissioner Adams opposed)

approved the Change Order with G. E. Capital

Modular Space resulting in a monthly charge of

$5,964 and an annual cost of $71,568, as


'UO!{ I .. I

-59-

. , " -- -. -. ' .. ,',"': '

. .' ". ',.:', " ,0 :

, .. , c' -', - ,

".' ,

". - -

"'.- <

I1.E.1.

CHANGE ORDER IS ON FILE IN THE


MUNIS SOFTWARE AGREEMENT


DATE: MAY 15,2002

TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

THROUGH: JOSEPH A. BAIRD, ASSISTANT CO.,... ADMINISTRA TO

FROM: ED FRY, FINANCE DIRECTOR JASON E. BROWN, BUDGET MANAGER

SUBJECT: MUNIS SOFfW ARE AGREEMENT •

BACKGROUND

•

In December 2000, the Board authorized the Clerk of the Circuit Court to enter into a contract with the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) Research Center to assist in the development of a Request For Proposal for an Enterprise Financial System. The goal was to identify a software vendor that would be able to provide a financial system that would best meet the county's needs. The enterprise financial system would provide for' the integration of the purchasing system, the budget system, the accounts payable system, the personnel system, -the. utilities system, and other core financial systems. Currently, each system is independent, which requires each departlJlent to manually input similar information. The accounts payable system is over twenty years old. The budget system is over ten years old. The Utilities system is over ten years old. The purchasing system runs on a PC based platform, which is incompatible with the platform used for budget and accounts payable. None of the Board's departments have computer access to the budget, purchasing, and accounts payable systems, but must rely upon paper reports that are provided once a month.

To guide the selection process, two committees were established, an Executive Steering Committee and an Advisory Committee. The Executive Steering Committee provided overall policy and direction to the Advisory Committee. The Advisory Committee prepared the Request For Proposal (RFP), evaluated the responses to the RFP, developed a short list of three software vendors to demonstrate their software, attended the software demonstrations, and made a recommendation to the Executive Steering Committee for a software vendor to provide an enterprise financial system to the county.

The Executive Steering Committee consisted of the Assistant County Administrator, the Clerk of the Circuit Court, the General Services Director, the Human Resources Director, and the Utilities Director. In addition, the Budget Manager, the Computer Services Director, the Information Systems Director, the Finance Director and the Assistant Finance Director served as staff advisors.

MAY 21, 2002

-60-

Of' I "-, I' u \ ! c-"-, " ..... , . . , . -, " . . " /- ,"'-

I . , '-"- " -=>'"

., ,"/:'-,. -' , -, - -

',. - - .,,' ,-- - - ,- -',' '. . .. -, ,',' _ ,r. ,__ _

- ' i· ,->~ ",:.,-

- , -, '

>-' .,' 'c" -, '

, -' - ,-

"', ' -",' , " , .

The Advisory Committee consisted of representatives of the Finance Departilient, Budget Office, Human Resources Deparlillent, Utilities DepartlIlent, Purchasing DepartJllent, Computer

Services DepartJllent, InfOlmation Systems Deparlillent, and the Clerk of the Circuit Court's offices.

The Advisory Committee developed a RFP for an Enterprise Financial System. The RFP provided general information about the current software systems in use and a detailed list of the requirements that any new software must meet. After being reviewed by the GFOA Research Center, the RFP was issued July 2,2001, with responses due by August 8, 2001.

Eight responses to the RFP were received. The vendors submitting responses were: AcuentlPeopleSoft; Aris/Orac1e; Eden; GEMS; New World Systems; SunGard Bi-Tech; SunGard Pentamation; and Munis. The Advisory Committee and the GFOA Research Center reviewed each of the responses for compliance with the RFP requirements and the ability to meet the detailed requirements of the RFP. Based upon that review, the Committee selected three vendors, GEMS, Munis, and SunGard Bi-Tech, to come to the County for two days of demonstrations. The purpose of the demonstrations was to provide an overview, of their software's capabilities and to show how their software would perform different county tasks. The GFOA Research Center developed a script to be used by each vendor. This script had to be followed by each vendor and would provide the Advisory Committee the ability to compare how each vendor's software would handle daily tasks.

After the two-day demonstrations, held in September and October 2001, the Advisory Committee recommended to the Executive Steering Committee that Munis be selected as the software vendor.

Munis provided a preliminary contract that was reviewed by the GFOA Research Center and by county staff Many changes were made to the contract. In addition, staff went to two different governments that were using Munis; Munis came to the county for another day of discovery in November 2001, and based upon some concerns with functionality of the software, Munis came to the county for two more days of demonstration in January 2002.

Staff has completed the review of the attached agreement and believes that it best meets the needs of the County. Munis has agreed to many things that are quite favorable for the County. Some of those are:

1) Unlimited users - The industry standard is to license by user. 2) Maximum price on services - There is a dollar cap on the amount of services that the

County will pay to achieve full implementation of the enterprise financial system. 3) Payments based on milestones - The County will make payments based on milestones

being achieved instead of services delivered. 4) Phased payments for the software - The County will pay for the software in phases as the

~oftware is implemented. The industry standard is to pay for all software upon delivery. 5) Discount for maintenance - The County will get a 50% discount on the first year of

maintenance.

In the last few years, governmental e-commerce has gained popularity and become a priority area for improving services to residents and visitors. E-commerce functionality was not an original requirement outlined in the RFP for an enterprise financial system. Munis currently offers a separate module for e-commerce that will be fully integrated into this system. This system will allow for online transactions, such as online payment of utility bills. Staff plans to execute a change order to this contract to provide an e-commerce module. We are recommending this approach, so that staff can fully define the functionality requirements for this module. Software license fees for this product are currently about $25,000.

MAY 21,2002 8" I

,~ , £-.... .. - ." .. '~ • ..

l 1 'J t . ... . . , .... I ~' , , t\ , i- e .. I t_1 . ) I .~

-61-

0 u 9

, ,"-

, -'" ' , - ',- -, . .. ." ..... ' ... . . .

Funding for this project will be provided from the following sources:

Sources:

Fund Description

Optional Sales Tax General Fund Utilities Dept. Building Division S.W.D.D. Golf Course

Total Sources

Uses:

Item Description

Software License Fees Hardware & Peripherals Maintenance Consulting Implementation Conversion Other

•

Total Uses

Total Implementation

$697,087 $0

$205,026 $51,257 $51,257 $20,503

$1,025,130

Total Implementation

$455,995 $266,000

$0 $27,500 $87,550 $30,360

$157,725

$1,025,130

Maintenance FY 2001102

$0 $35,176 $10,345 $2,587 $2,587 $1,035

$51,730

Maintenance FY 2001102

$51,730

$51,730

Maintenance FY2002/03

$0 $81,576 $23,993 $5,998 $5,998 __ $2,399

$119,964

Maintenance FY 2002/03

$119,964

$119,864

-Fm;ds have been allocated for a financial software system in Optional Sales Tax in the amount of $700,000. A budget amendment will be necessary to provide for maintenance fees for fiscal year 2001102, as well as hardware costs for the enterprise funds. Maintenance fees for the 2002/03 fiscal year will be requested in the budget process for next year. Additionally, a Database Administrator position will be requested in the Computer Services departlllent to assist

departments in implementation and provide ongoing support for the system. This position will also provide general support for COllnty depar tlllents on the computer network.

Copies of the contract docllments are on file in the office of the Board of County Commissioners for review.

RECOMM ENDATION

Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Chair to sign the Agreement with Munis.

MAY 21, 2002 ou I

-;>. " -'.~. r'l r' 0°

C ' . . , , I - , ' ..; . t-

o

1 J un - -, - , • I II \. ,." "'--

-62-

, .,

n \~J

, ,'-- .

Commissioner Ginn was concerned about the involvement of Tyler Technology in

Munis and wanted to be certain that this company was nothing like the companies involved

with the software purchased for the Tax Collector and the Utilities Department.

Finance Director Ed Fry explained there was a very detailed process to select the best

vendor. 8 proposals were received and the companies were looked at on the basis of their

responses, their fiscal stability, the size of their customer base, and their software source.

Munis has been in existence over 20 years, is very stable and has over 700 clients. Munis

was acquired by Tyler with a lot of other companies. Staff feels confident that Munis will

be there for us. We will not be a test site, this is proven software which is in use by the

Broward County Sheriff's Office. The Government Finance Officers Association did a

survey to check the software customer satisfaction level and was pleased with the result.

Director Fry continued that this will be a time-consuming and difficult task and it will

probably be 2003 before everything is in place. He thanked everyone who cooperated in this

effort: the Board's office, the County Attorney's office, Budget, Purchasing, and Utilities.

He also expressed appreciation for the Government Finance Officers Association which did

a lot of the research and groundwork.

Director Fry also pointed out that there is an escrow agent for the source code so that

if Munis should discontinue business, the County would have access to the source code.

MAY 21, 2002



unanimously authorized the Chairman to execute the

Munis Software Agreement, as recommended by

staff.

-63-

.

,< -,',' , , : . ,'. -.'. . , ;'.. ..' . -, '- '-, .

, , -, -.-'" .

AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE


I1.G.1. JUNGI-IE TRAIL/PELICAN ISLAND WILDLIFE I{EFUGE

- PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS -PROJECT 9724 - BRAD

SMITH ASSOCIATES, INC. REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF

RETAINAGE


TO:

THROUGH:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

DATE:

James Chandler, County Administrator

James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Directo ',--

Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E., County Engineee

Jungle TraiVPelican Island Wildlife Refuge Public Improvements IRC Project No. 9724 REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF RETAINAGE

May 9,2002


Indian River County entered into a Professional Architectural Services Agreement with Brad Smith Associates, Inc. on May 23,2000. The original compensation amount was $154,022.00. Two (2) amendments to the agreement have been executed which changed the compensation amount to $193,361.00.

The Design and Permitting portion of the Professional Architectural Services Agreement has been completed.

The Consultant has received $169,275.01 to date with $18,825.49 (10%) retainage previously held ~ by the County until a partial release of retainage in the amount of $9,412.75.(5%) was granted by the . Board of County Commissioners on December 7, 2001. The Consultant is now requesting a release of the remainder of retain age in the amount of $9,412.74. The Professional Architectural Services Agreement states that the retainage will be released upon award of a Construction Contract, which has occurred. Construction is underway.

MAY 21,2002 r~n r J ~ • ! "'i , '-

-64-

'-,',-,,";

, ", ,

, ' ',.',' . . .

',",., , ','" , .-- '.', '

" " ;

ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS

Alternative No.1 - Approve the Consultant's request for release of remaining retainage in the amount of$9,412.74.

Alternative No.2 - Deny the Consultant's request for release of remaining retainage.

RECOMNffiNDATIONSANDFUNDWG

Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. Funding to be from Account No. 315-214-541-067.94.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Brad Smith Associates, me., Consultant's Request for Payment dated April 26, 2002.

Chairman Stanbridge wanted the public to know that this project is being financed

by a grant from the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA), not ad

valorem taxes.

MAY 21, 2002



unanimously approved the consultant's request for

release of remaining retainage in the amount of

$9,412.74, as recommended by staff.

-65-

-. -f) I) ~ l ,- _ ..

, " , "

". ,-

, - " .. .

- , ,

" ,-. - ,",', -

II.H.I.

.' . ---'. _ -, ""-,0.:"

" . . . .. : -:. -. ,.

, -:,' "~<:~'-+:~~\ y~ ~:;·:;:~3if.~~~' :~g'> ';:~"~-'::<':<> i;;::f!;-:/_~~(~;:<:;J;,~:,\;:,\~,,~;: /~~/f':~~_~;;:~_~{:~_;)i;;;'~<';i_;'i'~:':>;~_::;?:~:;~~?:"~:~\;;~~~~':~:::-'i~-:; "'::':) -' -- . ,-

UTILITY SERVICES 452.200 MHZ UHF WASTEWATER

RADIO TELEMETRY FREQUENCY - DATA FLOW

SYSTEMS, INC. RADIO TELEMETRY UNITS (RTUs) _

TELECOM NETWORK, INC.


DATE:

TO:

THRU:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

MAY 10, 2002

JAMES E. CHANDLER, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR

W. ERIK OLSON, DIRECTOR OF UTII ,ITY SERVICES

GENE A. RAUTH, OPERATIONS MANAGER

DEPARTMENT OF UTII.ITY SERVICES 452.200 MHz UHF WASTEWATER RADIO TELEMETRY FREQUENCY

BACKGROUND:

The Department of Utility Services currently uses a licensed Federal Communications Commission (FCC), 452.200 MHz UHF radio frequency as part of its wireless telemetry system for the monitoring and control of Countywide wastewater collection / reuse distribution systems, One of the core components of these systems are the 227 radio telemetry units (RUT), manufactured by Data Flow Systems, Inc., of Melbourne, Florida. The 227 RTUs are located throughout the County at various lift stations, collection, and distribution points. The 227 RTU's utilize the 452.200 MHz UHF frequency for two-way communication with the West Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF). Since the system was commissioned in 1990, the DepaItment of Utility Services has been utilizing Data Flow Systems, Inc., for technical and product support.

In July of 2001, staff requested Data Flow System, Inc.'s assistance in trouble-shooting several minor operation communication problems between the West Regional WWTF, and several of the 227 RTU's in the field. Upon review of the radio spectnun on or around the 452.200 MHz UHF frequency, it was discovered that an intermittent, non-Indian River County signal, existed. The intermittent signal is a source of interference, which results in a loss of monitoring and control of the County system. Further investigation by Data Flow Systems, Inc, traced the intermittent signal to a 500-foot tall tower located in Palm Bay, Florida. Staffhas since contacted the FCC, as well as the party responsible for the source of the interference, Telecom Network, Inc., of Birmingham, Alabama. Telecom Network, Inc., is a voice-communication company.

Both the FCC and Telecom Network, Inc., have informed staff that the 500-foot tower located in Palm Bay is properly licensed, and operating legally with the 452.200 MHz UHF frequency.

MAY 21,2002 81l • j' ') ,.--. ,,. .. , ... J- a i

, ; II • ,

" ,

111 p ;'-"'1 ,. .'") I

,< C . , , , .". k .. " , .. , '"' ',- • j-

-66-

b, ,

'- - > ':~ - "

- - ,-

.. " -,

':'-': - " -, ,'- - '

, - -',' -;-': ," ,-

ANALYSIS:

In 1995, the FCC implemented the Frequency Re-farming Act. This act established different levels of priority use for any frequency below 512.Nlliz UHF. The Re-farming Act gave a higher level of priority to voice communication, with a lower priority being given to non-voice communication. (See attached letter). As previously stated, the Department of Utility Services is

communication priority. The Frequency Re-farming Act has legally allowed voice communication companies such as Telecom Network, Inc., the use of frequencies already assigned to non-voice users such as Indian River County.

The problem that staff is now presented with, is that the interference will continue to cause a loss of monitoring and control of the County system, unless some type of corrective action is taken. Staffhas requested and received from Data Flow Systems, Inc., several options that will resolve the problem. (See attached letter).

Option # 1:

Option # 2:

Option # 3:

Purchase and document the higher license priority's legal rights to the 452.200 MHz UHF frequency from Telecom Network, Inc., for the amount of $30,000.

Switch the system to an available UHF frequency other than the 452.200 .Nll:Iz UHF frequency.

Relicense 227 sites to a new UHF frequency Retune all 227 radios to a new UHF frequency

TOTAL

Convert the system to an available VHF frequency Replace and re-license all 227 UHF radios with 227 VHF radios.

$ 22,700 $ 41,997 $ 64,697

TOTAL $ 429,030

•

Data Flow Systems, Inc., has recommended Option # 1 as the most cost-effective option. Based" ' upon this recommendation, staff has contacted Telecom Network, Inc., to confirm a willingness of sale and purchase price of $30,000. Telecom Network, Inc., has confirmed the purchase prices, and provided a draft agreement for the purchase. Staff would like permission to pursue Option # 1, and purchase the higher priority legal rights for the 452.200 .Nll:Iz UHF frequency for the amount of $30,000.

RECOMMENDATION:

It is staff's recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approve the request to proceed with Option # 1, to purchase the higher legal rights for the 452.200 MHz UHF frequency from Telecom Network, Inc., in the amount of $30,000. It is staff's intent, at a later date, to bring back to the Board the Contract of Sale as a separate agenda item.

,

MAY 21,2002

" " -- - -"-" ,;,,"-';' -;"- ,,::";,; , ,.-,:' '

", "- ,-, -,,'-: ",--, '" '- - - ",' , "

- - "

-67-

"

, "',' , , -",- , "

- : -,;-'

"

,- , "

B" I {"- " 1 , ,

r, , , " .. ,

I " ,

~ ...

, " ' ,,-, ' -- ,--, ,-': --',.; '- ' ," " , .:,

-~ :,: -', ':" -.'::- '" ,,/' ,\:"'-~<--- ",' ,- , -: , -", ,-;,---' ,-;', '

',,-, -- '

-- N,

nl~

;' lJ

,- '-,

r (l r:; " ' "\ , , .; v "

, : ' , ',-- ,,- --

" ,'- ---" '-, , - - .' - '

'''. ,<'-"-'- .'>-",'-• c' '.," .. i; '. ,',0': _.' " __ '" p_


by Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously

approved the request to proceed with Option # 1 to

purchase the higher legal rights for the 452.200

MHz UHF frequency from Telecom Network, Inc.

in the amount of $30,000, with the understanding

that a Contract of Sale will be submitted to the

Board for approval at a later date, as recommended

by staff.

11.1. CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE _ NEEDS

ASSESSMENT CONSULTANT - PUBLIC SOLUTIONS, LLC

ROBIN S. CLEMENTS


TO: Indian River County Commission

DATE: May 15, 2002

SUBJECT: .Consent Agenda Contract for Needs Assessment Consultant for Children's Services Advisory Committee.

FROM: Joyce Johnston-Car/son

I request Ruth Stanbridge, as Chairman of th~ Boar~ of County C~mmissioners,' sign the contract between Indian River County and Public Solutions, LLC (Robm Clements) for needs

. assessment.

ank you.

oyce J ston-Carlson, Director , - ., . ,

Human Services

MAY 21,2002 B}{ ,I t ..

:-~j 1'''-:

f /--. . io--" ~-_.a

-68-

, "

,/<".',". -. - .; ... ".'" ,-.,,' .:','/ ,,' .• > - ' - -, -.'-

- - ',- - -, - -', - ','. :'" :" - '. - -- '-,:".-', - - .,' , - ,.'--,'

," /: - .',', - ,', " .',', '. ',; :',', ',' - ,," - ' - , --,' - ,- -

- , , '

'. ' ." '

", --"". "-,-:,'" -,'".- ,-'." -,.-'",-'.,.'''-"',.,' .',>-,'- -, ,',')- .. -::. -,-:;,:,,;,:,,-,-: .. ',. ,-,,'>--'-"' .. '--. -"'c,-'"

'-,' - - ......•....•.... ' -.' ,'-.- '. '''';'.' .. -~',--;':-:,;-'.- "'"., "-,, '0'- _,. _' __ ,',"'_','_ """,

\_, - ,-,-- '''. " , -, -, -> . ,':' - "-

13.A.

None.

14.A.

None.



unanimously authorized the Chairman to execute

the Consultant Agreement with Public Solutions,

LLC, as recommended by staff.

AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE


CHAIRMAN RUTH M. STANBRIDGE - UPDATES

EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT

14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT

The Chairman announced that immediately upon adjournment, the Board would

reconvene as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District. Those

Minutes are being prepared separately.

14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD

None.

MAY 21, 2002

-69-

- '" , .< ••• ', .' .'. - .>: -. . . -. . --- " • - "'. -' ,-: ,,' ," -, - -.,. ""<'" ',--

,'.J "_ _ " '.', ',,' .--:,,:., ,--' - '.'

, - , -

',' '- - - _. , .. . " -, ,,' - - . -', : - -,' - , ", : '>. - ', .. <.'< <,-','-.<.<' .. ".-" --.'.>. ':",:" - .' - - . - -

- - - "',, '

, -- '- '. " - - - - . - - . - -. ,- - '-' -

"

- ;, - --

There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded and carried, the Board adjourned at 10:04 a.m.

ATTEST:

J. K. on, Clerk

Minutes Approved: '-"

MAY 21,2002

" "" ',' - -,., -' - '-

II

,- ", - --," '

" '" ,-

-, - -,

t..:z;(

Ruth M. Stanbridge, Chairman

-70-....

•

.. - '. "

r.. , ~.JV I ,i\ '-' ..

- '-. - -' " " -" - , . .. . . - ',",

. , "

;' ,- ,

p

•

minutes attached - indian river county fl€¦ · minutes attached board of coun i v ......

Documents