match trajectories

12
Match Trajectories Jixie Zhang 02/20/2013 1

Upload: brinda

Post on 21-Mar-2016

48 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Match Trajectories. Jixie Zhang 02/20/2013. Background. When transverse target field is on, event reconstruction goes back to only to the target end plane. Need to find out the vertex plane (or named it interaction plane) to do correction. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Match Trajectories

1

Match Trajectories

Jixie Zhang02/20/2013

Page 2: Match Trajectories

2

Background

• When transverse target field is on, event reconstruction goes back to only to the target end plane. Need to find out the vertex plane (or named it interaction plane) to do correction.

• Match Ytg to honrizontal BPM does not help because Ytg resolution is larger than 1 mm.

• Match distance between BPM trajectory to the reconstructed trajectory MIGHT work (since it is 3-D matching instead of 1-D matching). This work is to try this method out ...

Page 3: Match Trajectories

3

5.0T Target Field, E=2.254, P0=2.251Beam goes to the local dump

• Generate TRUE V3Xbeam and V3Pbeam, beam position and angle at Zb=0. Gaussian smearing them by 0.3mm and 1 mrad to get BPM measured values: V3Xbpm and V3Pbpm.

• Create vertex point V3X0(X0,Y0,Z0), and V3P0 by drifting TRUE beam point V3Xbeam to Z0.

• Drift electron from verex point to the sieve plane. Smear the sieve with SNAKE resolution (1 mm in position, 1 mrad in angle), then swing it back to the target end plane to achieve position V3snake(Xsnake,Ysnake,Zsnake) and momentum V3Psnake.

• Reconstructed trajectory: swing from V3Xsnake and V3Psnake• BPM trajectory: swing from V3Xbpm and V3Pbpm• Compare these 2 trajectories to get the most closest points. Sign the variables of

the matched point on the reconstructed track as #rec (# stands for x, y, z, theta, phi...). Sign the variables of the matched point one the BPM track as #match.

• Will show the results in next few slices ......

Page 4: Match Trajectories

4

Matching 2 Trajectories

Page 5: Match Trajectories

5

How good is the result?

About 24% never matched. The other 76% will find the most closest point but no obvious peak exist within the target, which means no REAL match at all.

Page 6: Match Trajectories

6

2 mm Slice at Target Center

Page 7: Match Trajectories

7

2 mm Slice at Target Center, CUT

Page 8: Match Trajectories

8

2 mm Slice at 10 mm downstream

Page 9: Match Trajectories

9

2 mm Slice at 10 mm downstream, CUT

Page 10: Match Trajectories

10

2 mm Slice at 10 mm upstream

Page 11: Match Trajectories

11

2 mm Slice at 10 mm upstream, CUT

Page 12: Match Trajectories

12

Conclusion

• Could there be any mistake in the method? Need more time to double check.

• If this work is correct, then we can say matching 2 trajectories in 3-D will not do anything better than matching in 1-D in event by event reconstructions.

• Need some more good ideas.