trajectories - comparative and historical...

86
CONTENTS Book Symposia Features and News Trajectories Newsletter of the ASA Comparative and Historical Sociology Section Vol 28 No 3 · Spring 2017 Section Officers Editor's Introduction Victoria Reyes University of Michigan & University of California, Riverside OP-ED CORNER Comparative-Historical Perspectives on European Populism

Upload: others

Post on 17-May-2020

7 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • CONTENTS

    Book Symposia

    Features and News

    TrajectoriesNewsletter of the ASA

    Comparative and Historical Sociology SectionVol 28 No 3 · Spring 2017

    Section Officers

    Editor's IntroductionVictoria ReyesUniversity of Michigan &University of California,Riverside

    OP-ED CORNER

    Comparative-HistoricalPerspectives on EuropeanPopulism

  • Page 2

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Comparative-Historical Perspectives on European Populism

    Populism as CollateralDamage: Opportunities forComparative Analysis

    Mabel BerezinCornell University

  • Page 3

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Comparative-Historical Perspectives on European Populism

    ...populism is not going awayanytime soon—even if populistchallengers lose elections—because the problems thatausterity, migration and securityhave generated remain unsolved.

  • Page 4

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Comparative-Historical Perspectives on European Populism

    The F-Word and the FrenchNational Front

    Dorit GevaCentral European University; and EURIASFellow, Collegium de Lyon

  • Page 5

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Comparative-Historical Perspectives on European Populism

  • Page 6

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Comparative-Historical Perspectives on European Populism

    Ireland in Europe: Best Child inthe Class or Canary in theCoalmine?

    Seán Ó RiainNational University of Ireland, Maynooth

  • Page 7

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Comparative-Historical Perspectives on European Populism

    Is De-democratization theFuture of Central and EasternEurope?

    Besnik PulaVirginia Tech

    For both domestic andexternal reasons, Ireland mayneed the European project torevitalise itself, just as muchas the countries racked bypolitical turmoil in the core.

  • Page 8

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Comparative-Historical Perspectives on European Populism

    Finding scapegoats to blame forthe new insecurities of neoliberalglobalization is the specialty ofethnonationalist parties who fillthe void left by a sclerotic EU andthe political ineptitude andunimaginativeness of mainstreamparties who for a long time sawtheir chief task to be doing thelocal bidding for Brussels.

  • Page 9

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Comparative-Historical Perspectives on European Populism

  • Page 10

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    How Societies and States Count

    Book Symposium

    Comments on Antecedents ofCensuses and Changes inCensuses

    Daniel HirschmanBrown University

    The Antecedents of Censusesfrom Medieval to Nation States

    Changes in Censuses fromImperialist to Welfare StatesHow Societies and States Count, Vols. I & IIPalgrave Macmillan

    Rebecca Jean Emigh, Dylan Riley &

    Patricia Ahmed

  • Page 11

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    How Societies and States Count

  • Page 12

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    How Societies and States Count

    My biggest concern is the binaryaround which the entireargument is framed: state vs.society. This binary tends tooverly dichotomize and reify twovery blurry entities.

  • Page 13

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    How Societies and States Count

  • Page 14

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    How Societies and States Count

    ...the books focus very single-mindedly on censuses. And yet,I think this focus may weakentheir ability to make some oftheir strongest theoreticalclaims that relate back to thebroader question of states’capacity to gather information.

  • Page 15

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    How Societies and States Count

    Comments on How Societiesand States Count

    Mara LovemanUniversity of California, Berkeley

  • Page 16

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    How Societies and States Count

    ...the historical case studies areundeniably well-researched andinteresting; and the generalexplanatory model is generalenough and flexible enough tobe somewhat hard to argueagainst. And yet, I find that I amstill left with a long list ofquestions that, to my mind,need to be clarified orelaborated in order to fullyappreciate the challenge posedby these works to existingscholarship on census historyand historical state formation.

  • Page 17

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    How Societies and States Count

  • Page 18

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    How Societies and States Count

  • Page 19

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    How Societies and States Count

    Comments on How Societiesand States Count

    G. Cristina MoraUniversity of California, Berkeley

  • Page 20

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    How Societies and States Count

    How Societies and StatesCount: Five Variations

    Jacob FosterUniversity of California, Los Angeles

  • Page 21

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    How Societies and States Count

  • Page 22

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    How Societies and States Count

    HSSC’s fusion of comparativeand genealogical methodspoints toward a new mode ofcomparative-historical analysis,one that can address this morenuanced (and empiricallyadequate) view of path-dependence. Call this a“phylogenetic” method, toborrow a term from evolutionarybiology.

  • Page 23

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    How Societies and States Count

  • Page 24

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    How Societies and States Count

  • Page 25

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    How Societies and States Count

    The Census and itsAntecedents

    Corey TazzaraScripps College

  • Page 26

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    How Societies and States Count

    The major thrust of theirargument is to socialize boththe knowledge and the processof gathering demographicinformation...that seemspersuasive, but it does make mewonder how they would situatethe role of states in thisprocess.

  • Page 27

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    How Societies and States Count

    Comments on How Societiesand States Count

    Tong LamUniversity of Toronto

  • Page 28

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    How Societies and States Count

    The authors have done anadmirable job of bringingmultiple sets of historical datatogether. Their aspirations topresent a somewhat universalmodel for making sense ofcensus practices across timeand space is also commendable.However, for those of us whostudy the “rest of the world,”we rarely would have theconfidence to make such ageneralization.

  • Page 29

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    How Societies and States Count

    The Past and Future ofCensuses: Reflections on HowSocieties and States Count

    Jean-Guy PrévostUniversité du Québec à Montréal

  • Page 30

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    How Societies and States Count

  • Page 31

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    How Societies and States Count

  • Page 32

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    How Societies and States Count

    Comments on How Societiesand States Count

    Emily Klancher MerchantUniversity of California, Davis

  • Page 33

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    How Societies and States Count

    ...I found that the scientificcategories used by the authors,who are sociologists, did notquite line up either with the laycategories at my disposal orwith the scientific categories Iuse as a historian.

  • Page 34

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    How Societies and States Count

  • Page 35

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    How Societies and States Count

    The long time span of the booksemphasizes that informationgathering did not originate withstates in the historical sense;rather, censuses drew from andbuilt on earlier modes of datacollection that originated in thesocial domain. But this long timespan also obscures very realruptures that accompanied thefirst censuses in the UnitedStates, the United Kingdom, andItaly.

  • Page 36

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    How Societies and States Count

    Reply to Critics

    Rebecca Jean EmighUniversity of California, Los Angeles

    Dylan RileyUniversity of California, Berkeley

    Patricia AhmedSouth Dakota State University

  • Page 37

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    How Societies and States Count

  • Page 38

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    How Societies and States Count

    ...censuses are not an inevitableproduct of state formation nor isstate formation an automaticproduct of censuses. Instead, itis an empirical question as towhether state formationproduces census formation (orvice versa).

  • Page 39

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    How Societies and States Count

    We...disagree...that weclassified all actorsdichotomously as state or socialones. In fact, we consideredextensively the nature of therelation of actors in thesedomains by borrowing themechanisms of co-option,usurpation, imitation, andinnovation from Loveman.

  • Page 40

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    How Societies and States Count

  • Page 41

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    How Societies and States Count

    Our claim is that a surveyinstrument can produceknowledge from that instrumentonly to the extent to whichpopulations can answer thequestions that the survey isasking. Thus, both state andsocial actors, must in somesense, “know” the sameinformation for it to be compiledand widely accepted as usefulsocial knowledge.

  • Page 42

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    How Societies and States Count

  • Page 43

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Postcolonial Thought and Social Theory

    Julian Go’s World: Postcolonialthought, Social Theory, andHuman Liberation.

    Aldon MorrisNorthwestern University

    Postcolonial Thought andSocial TheoryOxford University Press

    Julian Go

    Book Symposium

  • Page 44

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Postcolonial Thought and Social Theory

  • Page 45

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Postcolonial Thought and Social Theory

  • Page 46

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Postcolonial Thought and Social Theory

    The idea of starting on theground is problematic. Where isthe ground? It is true that thesubjugated stands on its uniquegrounds. Likewise, the powerfulstands on its grounds. Yet, thepowerful have experiences andpractices as do the dominated.Therefore, rather than alwaysstarting on the ground of thedominated, would it not betheoretically fruitful toinvestigate the grounds of thesubjugated and powerfulsimultaneously, constantlycomparing and reworking eachperspective in pursuit oftheoretical synthesis?

  • Page 47

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Postcolonial Thought and Social Theory

  • Page 48

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Postcolonial Thought and Social Theory

    Towards an UngovernableSocial Theory: PostcolonialThought, Social Theory and theColoniality of the Present

    Zine MagubaneBoston College

  • Page 49

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Postcolonial Thought and Social Theory

    Whereas the postcolonial theoristfrom whom he drew inspirationwrote polemically, Go’s text is amodel of social scientific restraint.

  • Page 50

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Postcolonial Thought and Social Theory

  • Page 51

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Postcolonial Thought and Social Theory

    I would like to suggest thatthere is a particular urgency tohaving race theory undergo thekind of radical upheaval thatGo’s work provides an openingfor. How much of it will survivethe disruption is an openquestion.

  • Page 52

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Postcolonial Thought and Social Theory

  • Page 53

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Postcolonial Thought and Social Theory

    Comments on Julian Go’sPostcolonial Thought andSocial Theory

    Marco GarridoUniversity of Chicago

  • Page 54

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Postcolonial Thought and Social Theory

    To the extent that there is asubaltern standpoint, it doesnot consist in the repudiation of“Western” categories. It doesnot consist in the invocation ofnew, “indigenous” categories.These are the gestures ananalyst makes in the name ofthe subaltern. Differencebecomes knowledge not in theform of new categories but inthe re-inflection of familiarones.

  • Page 55

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Postcolonial Thought and Social Theory

  • Page 56

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Postcolonial Thought and Social Theory

    The long argument postcolonialthought has been having with“Western” thinkers is, as I thinkGo shows, a sympathetic one. Itis not aimed at proving themwrong but at showing that theydid not go far enough inpursuing the spirit and promiseof the Enlightenment beyondtheir shores, and even beyondtheir stations.

  • Page 57

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Postcolonial Thought and Social Theory

    Postcolonial HistoricalSociology? A Reply to Garrido,Magubane, and Morris

    Julian GoBoston University

  • Page 58

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Postcolonial Thought and Social Theory

    In short, this is the problem:social theory embeds theculture of imperialism;postcolonial thought manifestscritiques of empire. Socialtheory comes from the center ofmodern empire and was part ofthe imperial episteme;postcolonial thought rose fromits margins and offers sustainedcritiques of imperial formationswhile envisioning post-imperialfutures. This basic tension hasmore current manifestations.

  • Page 59

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Postcolonial Thought and Social Theory

    My proposal rests upon theassumption that all standpointshave the capacity to produceknowledge, just that they eachoffer only partial knowledgeThey are like different maps of acity: a map of the subwaysystem tells us something aboutthe city but not everything,while a map of the streets tellsus something different (but alsonot everything). In this sense,the subaltern standpoint istheoretically equivalent with theimperial standpoint: both aresocially-situated, both arepartial and yet (potentially)objective.

  • Page 60

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Postcolonial Thought and Social Theory

    In the book, I suggest that onebenefit of a subalternstandpoint approach is not justto find new categories andconcerns upon which to mountour postcolonial sociologies butalso to push at the limits ofseemingly universal knowledge– to draw the boundaries of theimperial standpoint from thestandpoint of the particular.

  • Page 61

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Postcolonial Thought and Social Theory

  • Page 62

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Postcolonial Thought and Social Theory

    What is it about the subfield ofcomparative-historical sociologythat has rendered it, like criticalrace theory and like othersectors of social thought,immune to postcolonialthought? And might that changein the near future?

  • Page 63

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Partisans and Partners

    Partisans and PartnersThe Politics of the Post-Keynesian SocietyUniversity of Chicago Press

    Josh Pacewicz

    Book Symposium

    Partisans and Partners:Perceptive, Prescient, andPessimistic

    Elizabeth Popp BermanUniversity at Albany, SUNY

  • Page 64

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Partisans and Partners

  • Page 65

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Partisans and Partners

    The power of labor and thepower of traditional businesswere both in decline evenbefore the funding mechanismchanged—a power vacuum wasalready opening up. And powerbrokers would have had to workhard to lure new businesses in,even without the change infederal financing. So I wonderwhether the emphasis onneoliberal policies specifically—versus broader political-economic transformations—ismisplaced.

  • Page 66

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Partisans and Partners

  • Page 67

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Partisans and Partners

    Comments on Partisans andPartners

    Michael McQuarrieLondon School of Economics

  • Page 68

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Partisans and Partners

    How does the partisans/partnersdivision map onto the oppositionbetween indoor and outdoorpolitics, or partisan action vs.nonprofits or civic action? Tosustain itself as a generalnarrative, which I think isplausible for a number of cities,there probably needs to be astronger explanation of how thisworks in cities that havedifferent political cultures fromthose in the cities he studies.

  • Page 69

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Partisans and Partners

  • Page 70

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Partisans and Partners

    Reply to Critics

    Josh PacewiczBrown University

  • Page 71

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Partisans and Partners

    I see this as the right startingpoint for the book: whathappened in local governancethat led local elites to cedecontrol of grassroots politics toweekend activists?

  • Page 72

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Partisans and Partners

  • Page 73

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Partisans and Partners

    [T]he book is about politicaleconomy, not politics or theeconomy (so I agree thatpolitical-economictransformations are what shouldbe central to the story). Thebook is also not about federalpolicy transformation per se,but about how policytransformation changescommunity governance andultimately people’s politicalintuitions.

  • Page 74

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Partisans and Partners

  • Page 75

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Partisans and Partners

  • Page 76

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Partisans and Partners

    ...swings like those between2012 and 2016 are just 21stCentury American politics asusual. That is, many peoples’political intuitions do not runthe gamut from left to right, somuch as from partner topartisan/populist—so Obamaand Trump are both normal andexpected electoral outcomes(and, as traditional voterscontinue to die off, will becomemore so).

  • Page 77

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Partisans and Partners

  • Page 78

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Working Group Spotlight

    Section News

    Spotlight: ComparativeHistorical Sociology SectionWorking Groups

    Editor's Introduction

    Marilyn Grell-BriskUniversité de Neuchâtel

    Carbon Tax Problem-SolvingWorking Group

    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1myGlNGAFSaxu4XtMfcZPCh1xUQrN7FN0n98l68cPLfI/edit

  • Page 79

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Working Group Spotlight

  • Page 80

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    Working Group Spotlight

    The Tax Reform Problem-Solving Working Group

  • Page 81

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    New Publications

    New Publications

    Books and Edited Volumes

    Neoliberal Apartheid:Palestine/Israel and South Africaafter 1994University of Chicago Press, 2017

    Andy Clarno

    Modernity and the Jews inWestern Social ThoughtUniversity of Chicago Press, 2017

    Chad Alan Goldberg

  • Page 82

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    New Publications

    A Social Revolution: Politics andthe Welfare State in IranUniversity of California Press, 2017

    Kevan Harris

    Innovation in Science andOrganizational Renewal:Historical and SociologicalPerspectivesPalgrave Macmillan, 2016

    Thomas Heinze and Richard Munch(Eds.)

  • Page 83

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    New Publications

    Breaking the WTO: How EmergingPowers Disrupted the NeoliberalProjectStanford University Press, 2016

    Kristen Hopewell

    Intimate Interventions in GlobalHealth: Family Planning and HIVPrevention in Sub-Saharan AfricaCambridge University Press, 2017

    Rachel Sullivan Robinson

  • Page 84

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    New Publications

    Doing Violence, Making Race:Lynching and White Racial GroupFormation in the U.S. South,1882-1930Routledge, 2017

    Mattias Smångs

    What is an Event?University of Chicago Press, 2017

    Robin Wagner-Pacifici

  • Page 85

    Trajectories

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    New Publications

    New Publications

    Articles &

    Book Chapters

  • Page 86

    Trajectories News and Announcements

    Spring 2017 · Vol 28 · No 3

    SECTION MEMBERSHIPRECRUITMENT DRIVE

    DEMOCRACY CONVENTION III

    Section News

    News and SectionAnnouncements