ispod district report - durham 11apr09

19
DURHAM COUNTY REPORT The North Carolina Alliance for Athletics, Health, Physical Education, Recreation,and Dance (NCAAHPERD), launched In-school Prevention of Obesity andDisease (IsPOD) in 2007. The initiative began with a grant from the NC Healthand Wellness Trust Fund and was expanded with grants from the Blue CrossBlue Shield of North Carolina Foundation. The expansion to a state-wide programis supported by a $3.6 million grant from the Kate B. Reynolds Charitable Trust.NCAAHPERD is engaged with a large network of health and physical educationgroups seeking greater opportunities for a healthier and more creative NorthCarolina. IsPOD Data Report Fall 2010

DESCRIPTION

IsPOD Data Report Fall 2010 % Needy ID School Name Grades 3-5 Grades 1-2 SPARK Trained? Using FG? 2010- 2011 ADM FG Response Rates # Staff Trained 2011 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH All rights reserved. a. Average Daily Membership (ADM) for first month of the 2010-2011 school year.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - DURHAM 11APR09

DURHAM COUNTY

REPORT

The North Carolina Alliance for Athletics, Health, Physical Education, Recreation,and Dance (NCAAHPERD), launched In-school Prevention of Obesity

andDisease (IsPOD) in 2007. The initiative began with a grant from the NC Healthand Wellness Trust Fund and was expanded with grants from the Blue

CrossBlue Shield of North Carolina Foundation. The expansion to a state-wide programis supported by a $3.6 million grant from the Kate B. Reynolds Charitable

Trust.NCAAHPERD is engaged with a large network of health and physical educationgroups seeking greater opportunities for a healthier and more creative

NorthCarolina.

IsPOD Data

Report

Fall 2010

Page 2: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - DURHAM 11APR09

2011 NC IsPOD Evaluation

Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH All rights reserved.

Durham County

SPARK Training

Staff from Durham County began receiving SPARK training in the 2007-08

school year with the HWTF Grant. Durham County has 42 active K-8 public

schools in 2010-2011. Of these 42 schools, 40 schools (or 95%) have received

SPARK training. At these schools, a total of 72 PE teachers and 1 coordinators

have been trained in SPARK. Table 1 shows the Durham County K-8 schools

that have received SPARKTM training and the number of staff trained.

FitnessGramTM Response Rates are also given for each of the K-8 schools.

Table 1

Durham County K-8 Schools

Schools with SPARKTM Training and FitnessGramTM Response Rates

a. Average Daily Membership (ADM) for first month of the 2010-2011 school year.

ID School Name

DEMOGRAPHICS SPARK FITNESSGRAM

2010-2011 ADM

% Needy

SPARK Trained?

# Staff Trained

Using FG?

FG Response Rates

Grades 1-2

Grades 3-5

Grades 6-8

304 Bethesda Elementary 705 91% YES 2 NO 0% 0% NA

306 Brogden Middle 666 65% YES 3 NO NA NA 0%

308 Burton Elementary 355 88% YES 3 NO 0% 0% NA

310 Eastway Elementary 481 100% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

313 Easley Elementary 603 19% YES 1 YES 0% 96% NA

314 Chewning Middle 462 88% YES 2 NO NA NA 0%

315 Eno Valley Elementary 639 78% NO 0 NO 0% 0% NA

316 George L Carrington Mid 1184 47% YES 5 NO NA NA 0%

318 Club Boulevard Elem 509 61% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

319 Creekside Elementary 852 45% YES 2 NO 0% 0% NA

320 Glenn Elementary 646 98% YES 1 YES 0% 74% NA

322 Durham's Perf. Learning 149 55% NO 0 NO NA NA 0%

Page 3: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - DURHAM 11APR09

2011 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

2

Table 1

Durham County K-8 Schools

Schools with SPARKTM Training and FitnessGramTM Response Rates

a. Average Daily Membership (ADM) for first month of the 2010-2011 school year.

ID School Name

DEMOGRAPHICS SPARK FITNESSGRAM

2010-2011 ADM

% Needy

SPARK Trained?

# Staff Trained

Using FG?

FG Response Rates

Grades 1-2

Grades 3-5

Grades 6-8

323 Durham School Of Arts 1399 38% YES 4 NO NA NA 0%

324 Hillandale Elementary 620 61% YES 1 YES 0% 96% NA

327 Hope Valley Elementary 708 58% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

328 Holt Elementary 576 91% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

332 Forest View Elementary 612 63% YES 1 YES 0% 77% NA

336 Dps Hospital School 29 0% YES 3 NO 0% 0% 0%

338 James E Shepard Middle 436 64% YES 1 NO NA NA 0%

339 Lakewood Elementary 453 100% YES 1 YES 0% 95% NA

340 Little River Elementary 633 30% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

341 Lakeview School 143 100% YES 1 NO NA NA 0%

344 Fayetteville Street Elem 281 95% YES 2 NO 0% 0% NA

346 Lowe's Grove Middle 632 88% YES 3 NO NA NA 0%

347 George Watts Elementary 337 68% YES 1 YES 98% 96% NA

348 Mangum Elementary 486 32% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

352 Merrick-Moore Elem 668 99% YES 2 NO 0% 0% NA

354 Morehead Montessori 207 42% YES 1 YES 97% 84% NA

355 Neal Middle 604 83% YES 1 NO NA NA 0%

360 Oak Grove Elementary 534 78% YES 2 YES 0% 98% NA

362 Parkwood Elementary 607 70% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

363 E K Powe Elementary 359 94% YES 2 YES 0% 82% NA

364 Pearsontown Elementary 850 35% YES 3 NO 0% 0% NA

366 Sherwood Githens Middle 951 71% YES 2 NO NA NA 0%

367 R N Harris Elementary 378 97% YES 2 NO 0% 0% NA

370 Rogers-Herr Middle 637 44% YES 4 NO NA NA 0%

372 Southwest Elementary 581 65% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

374 C C Spaulding Elem 252 100% YES 2 NO 0% 0% NA

376 Spring Valley Elementary 583 70% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

388 W G Pearson Elementary 614 76% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

389 Wg Pearson Magnet Mid 312 69% YES 2 NO NA NA 0%

400 Y E Smith Elementary 341 99% YES 2 NO 0% 0% NA

Page 4: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - DURHAM 11APR09

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

3

Durham County

FitnessGramTM Response Rates

In fall 2010, 9 of the Durham County K-8 schools, or 21%, conducted

FitnessGramTM assessments and submitted their data. Table 2 shows the

FitnessGramTM Response Rates by grade for all Durham County K-8 schools

combined.

Table 2

FitnessGram™ Response Rates

For 9 K-8 Schools in Durham County

Grade 2010-2011

Average Daily Membershipa.

FitnessGramTM Response Rate

Number of FitnessGramTM

Student Ids

Percent of ADM

1st 2354 99 4%

2nd 2674 89 3%

3rd 2673 623 23%

4th 2526 668 26%

5th 2568 631 25%

6th 2211 0 0%

7th 2135 0 0%

8th 2195 0 0%

Grades 1 - 8 19336 2110 11% a. Average Daily Membership (ADM) for first month of the 2010-2011 school year.

Page 5: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - DURHAM 11APR09

2011 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

4

Page 6: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - DURHAM 11APR09

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

5

Body Mass Index (BMI)

North Carolina

Fall 2010 Percent in Health Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram™ Results for 579 NC K-8 Schools in 58 NC Districts

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male All

Female Male All

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

1st 60% 59% 59% 4567 2748 4768 2806 9335 5554

2nd 57% 59% 58% 5228 3003 5176 3030 10404 6033

3rd 55% 55% 55% 14701 8147 15387 8397 30088 16544

4th 54% 53% 53% 15209 8208 15858 8373 31067 16581

5th 51% 49% 50% 14996 7603 15616 7646 30612 15249

6th 50% 49% 50% 7632 3828 7491 3685 15123 7513

7th 52% 50% 51% 7010 3679 7179 3623 14189 7302

8th 55% 53% 54% 7190 3950 7172 3837 14362 7787

Total 54% 53% 53% 76533 41166 78647 41397 155180 82563

60

%

57

%

55

%

54

%

51

%

50

%

52

%

55

%59

%

59

%

55

%

53

%

49

%

49

%

50

% 53

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Perc

en

t in

HF

Z

Grade

Female Male

Page 7: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - DURHAM 11APR09

2011 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

6

Body Mass Index (BMI)

Durham County

Fall 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram™ Results for 9 K-8 Schools in Durham County

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male All

Female Male All

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

1st 57% 61% 59% 42 24 56 34 98 58

2nd 67% 55% 63% 57 38 29 16 86 54

3rd 51% 51% 51% 300 152 280 144 580 296

4th 52% 44% 48% 299 156 344 153 643 309

5th 40% 44% 42% 294 118 319 140 613 258

6th NA NA NA 0 0 0 0 0 0

7th NA NA NA 0 0 0 0 0 0

8th NA NA NA 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 49% 47% 48% 992 488 1028 487 2020 975

57

%

67

%

51

%

52

%

40

%

61

%

55

%

51

%

44

%

44

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Perc

en

t in

HF

Z

Grade

Female Male

Page 8: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - DURHAM 11APR09

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

7

PACER

North Carolina

Fall 2010 Percent in Health Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram™ Results for 579 NC K-8 Schools in 58 NC Districts

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male All

Female Male All

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

4th 96% 45% 70% 8911 8523 9343 4217 18254 12740

5th 91% 53% 72% 9378 8564 9541 5015 18919 13579

6th 71% 50% 60% 4434 3153 4670 2332 9104 5485

7th 64% 41% 52% 4124 2648 4554 1870 8678 4518

8th 43% 37% 40% 4282 1841 4867 1791 9149 3632

Total 79% 46% 62% 31129 24729 32975 15225 64104 39954

96

%

91

%

71

%

64

%

43

%

45

%

53

%

50

%

41

%

37

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Perc

en

t in

HF

Z

Grade

Female Male

Page 9: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - DURHAM 11APR09

2011 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

8

PACER

Durham County

Fall 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram™ Results for 9 K-8 Schools in Durham County

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male All

Female Male All

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

4th 98% 57% 76% 171 167 202 115 373 282

5th 92% 65% 77% 182 168 223 145 405 313

6th NA NA NA 0 0 0 0 0 0

7th NA NA NA 0 0 0 0 0 0

8th NA NA NA 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 95% 61% 76% 353 335 425 260 778 595

98

%

92

%

57

%

65

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Perc

en

t in

HF

Z

Grade

Female Male

Page 10: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - DURHAM 11APR09

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

9

AEROBIC CAPACITY (VO2 MAX)

North Carolina

Fall 2010 Percent in Health Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram™ Results for 579 NC K-8 Schools in 58 NC Districts

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male All

Female Male All

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

4th 75% 88% 82% 9312 6968 10261 9024 19573 15992

5th 68% 85% 77% 10121 6915 10886 9222 21007 16137

6th 60% 80% 70% 4261 2575 4407 3517 8668 6092

7th 58% 77% 68% 3914 2273 4417 3411 8331 5684

8th 57% 73% 65% 3859 2193 4371 3187 8230 5380

Total 66% 83% 75% 31467 20924 34342 28361 65809 49285

75

%

68

%

60

%

58

%

57

%

88

%

85

%

80

%

77

%

73

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Perc

en

t in

HF

Z

Grade

Female Male

Page 11: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - DURHAM 11APR09

2011 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

10

AEROBIC CAPACITY (VO2 MAX)

Durham County

Fall 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram™ Results for 9 K-8 Schools in Durham County

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male All

Female Male All

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

4th 73% 85% 79% 208 152 244 207 452 359

5th 63% 82% 74% 208 131 249 205 457 336

6th NA NA NA 0 0 0 0 0 0

7th NA NA NA 0 0 0 0 0 0

8th NA NA NA 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 68% 84% 76% 416 283 493 412 909 695

73

%

63

%

85

%

82

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Perc

en

t in

HF

Z

Grade

Female Male

Page 12: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - DURHAM 11APR09

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

11

CURL-UP

North Carolina

Fall 2010 Percent in Health Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram™ Results for 579 NC K-8 Schools in 58 NC Districts

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male All

Female Male All

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

1st 76% 73% 74% 965 734 1006 734 1971 1468

2nd 77% 79% 78% 1502 1160 1477 1169 2979 2329

3rd 79% 80% 80% 15470 12228 16202 12995 31672 25223

4th 78% 80% 79% 15960 12491 16569 13180 32529 25671

5th 75% 78% 77% 15984 12059 16466 12870 32450 24929

6th 79% 84% 82% 8812 6993 8813 7428 17625 14421

7th 79% 86% 82% 8043 6330 8273 7086 16316 13416

8th 81% 85% 83% 8252 6655 8247 6974 16499 13629

Total 78% 81% 80% 74988 58650 77053 62436 152041 121086

76

%

77

%

79

%

78

%

75

% 79

%

79

%

81

%

73

% 79

%

80

%

80

%

78

% 84

%

86

%

85

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Perc

en

t in

HF

Z

Grade

Female Male

Page 13: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - DURHAM 11APR09

2011 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

12

CURL-UP

Durham County

Fall 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram™ Results for 9 K-8 Schools in Durham County

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male All

Female Male All

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

1st 84% 82% 83% 38 32 51 42 89 74

2nd 84% 90% 86% 55 46 30 27 85 73

3rd 90% 90% 90% 295 266 278 250 573 516

4th 80% 77% 78% 298 237 342 265 640 502

5th 77% 78% 78% 293 225 316 248 609 473

6th NA NA NA 0 0 0 0 0 0

7th NA NA NA 0 0 0 0 0 0

8th NA NA NA 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 82% 82% 82% 979 806 1017 832 1996 1638

84

%

84

%

90

%

80

%

77

%82

%

90

%

90

%

77

%

78

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Perc

en

t in

HF

Z

Grade

Female Male

Page 14: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - DURHAM 11APR09

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

13

PUSH-UP

North Carolina

Fall 2010 Percent in Health Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram™ Results for 579 NC K-8 Schools in 58 NC Districts

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male All

Female Male All

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

1st 49% 60% 55% 913 449 955 570 1868 1019

2nd 56% 68% 62% 1340 748 1323 900 2663 1648

3rd 54% 68% 61% 14668 7913 15411 10458 30079 18371

4th 52% 68% 60% 15070 7821 15638 10696 30708 18517

5th 48% 66% 57% 15294 7278 15815 10395 31109 17673

6th 61% 74% 67% 8225 4984 8137 6021 16362 11005

7th 63% 73% 68% 7610 4783 7780 5704 15390 10487

8th 64% 68% 66% 7581 4814 7631 5192 15212 10006

Total 55% 69% 62% 70701 38790 72690 49936 143391 88726

49

%

56

%

54

%

52

%

48

%

61

%

63

%

64

%

60

%

68

%

68

%

68

%

66

%

74

%

73

%

68

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Perc

en

t in

HF

Z

Grade

Female Male

Page 15: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - DURHAM 11APR09

2011 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

14

PUSH-UP

Durham County

Fall 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram™ Results for 9 K-8 Schools in Durham County

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male All

Female Male All

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

1st 60% 64% 62% 42 25 55 35 97 60

2nd 64% 65% 64% 55 35 31 20 86 55

3rd 69% 80% 75% 297 205 284 228 581 433

4th 58% 71% 65% 278 161 314 224 592 385

5th 61% 72% 67% 267 163 312 225 579 388

6th NA NA NA 0 0 0 0 0 0

7th NA NA NA 0 0 0 0 0 0

8th NA NA NA 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 63% 73% 68% 939 589 996 732 1935 1321

60

% 64

% 69

%

58

% 61

%64

%

65

%

80

%

71

%

72

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Perc

en

t in

HF

Z

Grade

Female Male

Page 16: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - DURHAM 11APR09

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

15

SIT AND REACH

North Carolina

Fall 2010 Percent in Health Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram™ Results for 579 NC K-8 Schools in 58 NC Districts

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male All

Female Male All

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

1st 76% 75% 76% 739 565 792 597 1531 1162

2nd 71% 73% 72% 1198 854 1147 834 2345 1688

3rd 65% 65% 65% 13580 8848 14245 9265 27825 18113

4th 64% 61% 62% 14008 8914 14557 8894 28565 17808

5th 63% 61% 62% 14016 8778 14390 8720 28406 17498

6th 58% 60% 59% 7432 4329 7376 4446 14808 8775

7th 62% 58% 60% 6849 4233 6971 4076 13820 8309

8th 66% 61% 63% 6769 4466 6950 4243 13719 8709

Total 63% 62% 63% 64591 40987 66428 41075 131019 82062

76

%

71

%

65

%

64

%

63

%

58

% 62

% 66

%

75

%

73

%

65

%

61

%

61

%

60

%

58

%

61

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Perc

en

t in

HF

Z

Grade

Female Male

Page 17: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - DURHAM 11APR09

2011 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

16

SIT AND REACH

Durham County

Fall 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram™ Results for 9 K-8 Schools in Durham County

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male All

Female Male All

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

1st 90% 84% 87% 42 38 56 47 98 85

2nd 86% 77% 83% 56 48 31 24 87 72

3rd 70% 69% 70% 237 167 240 166 477 333

4th 69% 67% 68% 210 144 252 168 462 312

5th 71% 67% 69% 207 146 243 163 450 309

6th NA NA NA 0 0 0 0 0 0

7th NA NA NA 0 0 0 0 0 0

8th NA NA NA 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 72% 69% 71% 752 543 822 568 1574 1111

90

%

86

%

70

%

69

%

71

%

84

%

77

%

69

%

67

%

67

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Perc

en

t in

HF

Z

Grade

Female Male

Page 18: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - DURHAM 11APR09

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

17

TRUNK LIFT

North Carolina

Fall 2010 Percent in Health Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram™ Results for 579 NC K-8 Schools in 58 NC Districts

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male All

Female Male All

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

1st 84% 79% 82% 950 799 960 761 1910 1560

2nd 85% 83% 84% 1398 1184 1349 1113 2747 2297

3rd 88% 87% 87% 14810 13027 15557 13474 30367 26501

4th 89% 86% 87% 15237 13546 15857 13572 31094 27118

5th 74% 70% 72% 15609 11565 16015 11169 31624 22734

6th 80% 78% 79% 8282 6608 8178 6411 16460 13019

7th 79% 79% 79% 7715 6111 7764 6111 15479 12222

8th 81% 79% 80% 7663 6232 7805 6187 15468 12419

Total 82% 80% 81% 71664 59072 73485 58798 145149 117870

84

%

85

% 88

%

89

%

74

% 80

%

79

%

81

%

79

% 83

% 87

%

86

%

70

%

78

%

79

%

79

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Perc

en

t in

HF

Z

Grade

Female Male

Page 19: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - DURHAM 11APR09

2011 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

18

TRUNK LIFT

Durham County

Fall 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram™ Results for 9 K-8 Schools in Durham County

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male All

Female Male All

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

1st 53% 55% 54% 17 9 22 12 39 21

2nd 77% 80% 78% 22 17 10 8 32 25

3rd 92% 89% 91% 253 232 245 219 498 451

4th 86% 84% 85% 276 237 307 257 583 494

5th 77% 78% 77% 281 215 291 228 572 443

6th NA NA NA 0 0 0 0 0 0

7th NA NA NA 0 0 0 0 0 0

8th NA NA NA 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 84% 83% 83% 849 710 875 724 1724 1434

53

%

77

%

92

%

86

%

77

%

55

%

80

%

89

%

84

%

78

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Perc

en

t in

HF

Z

Grade

Female Male