ispod district report - cumberland 11apr09

CUMBERLAND

COUNTY REPORT

The North Carolina Alliance for Athletics, Health, Physical Education, Recreation,and Dance (NCAAHPERD), launched In-school Prevention of Obesity

andDisease (IsPOD) in 2007. The initiative began with a grant from the NC Healthand Wellness Trust Fund and was expanded with grants from the Blue

CrossBlue Shield of North Carolina Foundation. The expansion to a state-wide programis supported by a $3.6 million grant from the Kate B. Reynolds Charitable

Trust.NCAAHPERD is engaged with a large network of health and physical educationgroups seeking greater opportunities for a healthier and more creative

NorthCarolina.

IsPOD Data

Report

Fall 2010

2011 NC IsPOD Evaluation

Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH All rights reserved.

Cumberland County

SPARK Training

Staff from Cumberland County began receiving SPARK training in the 2009-10

school year with the KBR Grant. Cumberland County has 70 active K-8 public

schools in 2010-2011. Of these 70 schools, 67 schools (or 96%) have received

SPARK training. At these schools, a total of 108 PE teachers and 0 coordinators

have been trained in SPARK. Table 1 shows the Cumberland County K-8

schools that have received SPARKTM training and the number of staff trained.

FitnessGramTM Response Rates are also given for each of the K-8 schools.

Table 1

Cumberland County K-8 Schools

Schools with SPARKTM Training and FitnessGramTM Response Rates

a. Average Daily Membership (ADM) for first month of the 2010-2011 school year.

ID School Name

DEMOGRAPHICS SPARK FITNESSGRAM

2010-2011 ADM

% Needy

SPARK Trained?

# Staff Trained

Using FG?

FG Response Rates

Grades 1-2

Grades 3-5

Grades 6-8

302 Alma O Easom Elem 280 37% YES 1 NO 0% NA NA

306 Armstrong Elementary 402 56% YES 1 YES 0% 63% NA

308 Ashley Elementary 289 54% YES 0 YES NA 98% NA

310 Loyd E Auman Elem 588 61% YES 2 NO 0% 0% NA

312 Beaver Dam Elementary 110 60% NO 0 NO 0% 0% NA

316 Lillian Black Elementary 170 85% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

320 Brentwood Elementary 506 85% YES 2 YES 0% 95% NA

321 Douglas Byrd Middle 696 80% YES 4 YES NA NA 31%

326 Elizabeth Cashwell Elem 725 82% YES 1 YES 0% 101% NA

332 Eastover Central Elem 452 37% YES 0 YES 0% 58% NA

2011 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

2

Table 1 (continued)




ID School Name


2010-2011 ADM

% Needy

SPARK Trained?

# Staff Trained

Using FG?

FG Response Rates

Grades 1-2

Grades 3-5

Grades 6-8

336 Anne Chesnutt Middle 687 63% YES 3 NO NA NA 0%

338 Cliffdale Elementary 617 80% YES 1 YES 0% 99% NA

340 College Lakes Elem 422 70% YES 1 YES 0% 27% NA

342 C Wayne Collier Elem 520 61% YES 2 YES 0% 90% NA

344 J W Coon Elementary 229 94% YES 1 YES 0% 98% NA

348 Cumberland Mills Elem 608 73% YES 1 YES 0% 101% NA

352 Cumberland Road Elem 393 90% YES 1 YES 0% 97% NA

356 District No 7 Elementary 252 45% YES 1 YES 0% 98% NA

358 Luther "Nick" Jeralds Mid 605 87% YES 2 NO NA NA 0%

361 Ferguson-Easley Elem 328 93% YES 0 YES 11% 76% NA

362 Gray's Creek Middle 905 50% YES 2 YES NA NA 17%

363 Glendale Acres Elem 273 58% YES 1 NO 0% NA NA

364 Alderman Road Elem 673 64% YES 1 YES 0% 91% NA

365 R Max Abbott Middle 971 46% YES 4 YES NA NA 18%

366 Howard L Hall Elem 610 44% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

367 Bill Hefner Elementary 825 51% YES 1 YES 0% 30% NA

368 Hope Mills Middle 736 47% YES 3 YES NA NA 63%

369 John R Griffin Middle 1254 35% YES 6 YES NA NA 66%

370 Ed V Baldwin Elementary 662 52% YES 2 YES 0% 22% NA

371 Ireland Drive Middle 362 81% YES 1 YES NA NA 43%

372 Lewis Chapel Middle 739 67% YES 3 NO NA NA 0%

373 Gallberry Farm Elem 795 48% YES 2 YES 0% 92% NA

375 Gray's Creek Elementary 348 51% YES 2 YES 0% 91% NA

380 Long Hill Elementary 483 34% YES 1 YES 0% 36% NA

382 Lucile Souders Elem 450 77% YES 1 YES 0% 99% NA

383 Mac Williams Middle 1203 56% YES 5 YES NA NA 65%

386 Margaret Willis Elem 308 88% YES 1 YES 0% 99% NA

396 Mary Mcarthur Elem 477 78% YES 1 YES 0% 91% NA

397 E Melvin Honeycutt Elem 789 47% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

398 E E Miller Elementary 655 59% YES 2 YES 0% 94% NA



3

Table 1 (continued)




ID School Name


2010-2011 ADM

% Needy

SPARK Trained?

# Staff Trained

Using FG?

FG Response Rates

Grades 1-2

Grades 3-5

Grades 6-8

400 Montclair Elementary 419 74% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

401 Morganton Road Elem 526 61% YES 1 YES 0% 99% NA

402 Manchester Elementary 350 87% YES 1 YES 98% 96% NA

403 New Century Internat. Ele 594 #N/A YES 0 YES 0% 78% NA

404 William H Owen Elem 447 89% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

405 Pauline Jones Elem 185 96% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

406 Pine Forest Middle 948 42% YES 4 NO NA NA 0%

407 Lake Rim Elementary 559 52% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

410 Ponderosa Elementary 418 77% YES 1 YES 0% 100% NA

411 Reid Ross Classical 736 47% YES 2 YES NA NA 59%

412 Raleigh Road Elementary 236 34% NO 0 NO 0% NA NA

413 Ramsey St Middle School 11 100% YES 2 NO NA NA 0%

414 Benjamin J Martin Elem 607 76% YES 2 YES 0% 103% NA

415 Rockfish Elementary 793 46% YES 1 YES 8% 93% NA

416 J W Seabrook Elem 289 69% YES 1 YES 0% 94% NA

418 Seventy-First Classical 526 33% YES 1 NO NA NA 0%

425 South View Middle 793 60% YES 3 YES NA NA 97%

426 Sherwood Park Elem 497 71% YES 1 YES 0% 96% NA

428 Spring Lake Middle 397 88% YES 3 YES NA NA 50%

430 Stedman Elementary 303 50% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

432 Stedman Primary 156 70% NO 0 NO 0% NA NA

434 Stoney Point Elementary 674 23% YES 1 YES 0% 97% NA

440 Sunnyside Elementary 317 95% YES 1 YES 0% 105% NA

444 Teresa C Berrien Elem 146 100% YES 2 YES 0% 101% NA

448 Vanstory Hills Elementary 525 33% YES 1 YES 0% 98% NA

450 Warrenwood Elementary 428 84% YES 1 YES 0% 99% NA

452 Westarea Elementary 517 100% YES 1 YES 0% 92% NA

454 Westover Middle 715 70% YES 4 NO NA NA 0%

456 Alger B Wilkins Elem 221 78% YES 1 YES 0% 98% NA

459 William T Brown Elem 458 72% YES 2 YES 0% 98% NA



4

Cumberland County

FitnessGramTM Response Rates

In fall 2010, 49 of the Cumberland County K-8 schools, or 70%, conducted

FitnessGramTM assessments and submitted their data. Table 2 shows the

FitnessGramTM Response Rates by grade for all Cumberland County K-8 schools

combined.

Table 2

FitnessGram™ Response Rates

For 49 K-8 Schools in Cumberland County

Grade 2010-2011

Average Daily Membershipa.

FitnessGramTM Response Rate

Number of FitnessGramTM

Student Ids

Percent of ADM

1st 3699 51 1%

2nd 4123 102 2%

3rd 3906 2801 72%

4th 4123 2858 69%

5th 3947 2655 67%

6th 3984 1071 27%

7th 3921 1198 31%

8th 4045 1697 42%

Grades 1 - 8 31748 12433 39% a. Average Daily Membership (ADM) for first month of the 2010-2011 school year.



5

Body Mass Index (BMI)

North Carolina

Fall 2010 Percent in Health Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram™ Results for 579 NC K-8 Schools in 58 NC Districts

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male All

Female Male All

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

1st 60% 59% 59% 4567 2748 4768 2806 9335 5554

2nd 57% 59% 58% 5228 3003 5176 3030 10404 6033

3rd 55% 55% 55% 14701 8147 15387 8397 30088 16544

4th 54% 53% 53% 15209 8208 15858 8373 31067 16581

5th 51% 49% 50% 14996 7603 15616 7646 30612 15249

6th 50% 49% 50% 7632 3828 7491 3685 15123 7513

7th 52% 50% 51% 7010 3679 7179 3623 14189 7302

8th 55% 53% 54% 7190 3950 7172 3837 14362 7787

Total 54% 53% 53% 76533 41166 78647 41397 155180 82563

60

%

57

%

55

%

54

%

51

%

50

%

52

%

55

%59

%

59

%

55

%

53

%

49

%

49

%

50

% 53

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Perc

en

t in

HF

Z

Grade

Female Male



6

Body Mass Index (BMI)

Cumberland County

Fall 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram™ Results for 49 K-8 Schools in Cumberland County

Grade


Female Male All

Female Male All

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

1st 57% 61% 59% 23 13 23 14 46 27

2nd 42% 53% 47% 45 19 40 21 85 40

3rd 51% 53% 52% 1132 575 1129 604 2261 1179

4th 49% 48% 49% 1179 583 1243 600 2422 1183

5th 46% 45% 45% 1091 504 1173 522 2264 1026

6th 47% 51% 49% 427 199 428 220 855 419

7th 52% 48% 50% 527 276 597 286 1124 562

8th 55% 55% 55% 802 441 728 398 1530 839

Total 50% 50% 50% 5226 2610 5361 2665 10587 5275

57

%

42

%

51

%

49

%

46

%

47

% 52

% 55

%61

%

53

%

53

%

48

%

45

%

51

%

48

%

55

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Perc

en

t in

HF

Z

Grade

Female Male



7

PACER

North Carolina



Grade


Female Male All

Female Male All

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

4th 96% 45% 70% 8911 8523 9343 4217 18254 12740

5th 91% 53% 72% 9378 8564 9541 5015 18919 13579

6th 71% 50% 60% 4434 3153 4670 2332 9104 5485

7th 64% 41% 52% 4124 2648 4554 1870 8678 4518

8th 43% 37% 40% 4282 1841 4867 1791 9149 3632

Total 79% 46% 62% 31129 24729 32975 15225 64104 39954

96

%

91

%

71

%

64

%

43

%

45

%

53

%

50

%

41

%

37

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Perc

en

t in

HF

Z

Grade

Female Male



8

PACER

Cumberland County



Grade


Female Male All

Female Male All

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

4th 90% 23% 56% 705 634 747 174 1452 808

5th 80% 30% 55% 713 573 730 222 1443 795

6th 77% 56% 67% 253 194 239 135 492 329

7th 65% 37% 50% 279 180 318 119 597 299

8th 42% 39% 40% 504 213 487 188 991 401

Total 73% 33% 53% 2454 1794 2521 838 4975 2632

90

%

80

%

77

%

65

%

42

%

23

%

30

%

56

%

37

%

39

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Perc

en

t in

HF

Z

Grade

Female Male



9

AEROBIC CAPACITY (VO2 MAX)

North Carolina



Grade


Female Male All

Female Male All

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

4th 75% 88% 82% 9312 6968 10261 9024 19573 15992

5th 68% 85% 77% 10121 6915 10886 9222 21007 16137

6th 60% 80% 70% 4261 2575 4407 3517 8668 6092

7th 58% 77% 68% 3914 2273 4417 3411 8331 5684

8th 57% 73% 65% 3859 2193 4371 3187 8230 5380

Total 66% 83% 75% 31467 20924 34342 28361 65809 49285

75

%

68

%

60

%

58

%

57

%

88

%

85

%

80

%

77

%

73

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Perc

en

t in

HF

Z

Grade

Female Male



10

AEROBIC CAPACITY (VO2 MAX)

Cumberland County



Grade


Female Male All

Female Male All

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

4th 70% 86% 78% 624 436 695 599 1319 1035

5th 65% 85% 76% 650 425 766 653 1416 1078

6th 57% 82% 70% 208 119 209 171 417 290

7th 61% 77% 70% 225 137 271 208 496 345

8th 55% 73% 64% 442 242 447 328 889 570

Total 63% 82% 73% 2149 1359 2388 1959 4537 3318

70

%

65

%

57

% 61

%

55

%

86

%

85

%

82

%

77

%

73

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Perc

en

t in

HF

Z

Grade

Female Male



11

CURL-UP

North Carolina



Grade


Female Male All

Female Male All

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

1st 76% 73% 74% 965 734 1006 734 1971 1468

2nd 77% 79% 78% 1502 1160 1477 1169 2979 2329

3rd 79% 80% 80% 15470 12228 16202 12995 31672 25223

4th 78% 80% 79% 15960 12491 16569 13180 32529 25671

5th 75% 78% 77% 15984 12059 16466 12870 32450 24929

6th 79% 84% 82% 8812 6993 8813 7428 17625 14421

7th 79% 86% 82% 8043 6330 8273 7086 16316 13416

8th 81% 85% 83% 8252 6655 8247 6974 16499 13629

Total 78% 81% 80% 74988 58650 77053 62436 152041 121086

76

%

77

%

79

%

78

%

75

% 79

%

79

%

81

%

73

%

79

%

80

%

80

%

78

% 84

%

86

%

85

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Perc

en

t in

HF

Z

Grade

Female Male



12

CURL-UP

Cumberland County



Grade


Female Male All

Female Male All

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

1st NA NA NA 0 0 0 0 0 0

2nd 76% 88% 82% 51 39 51 45 102 84

3rd 77% 80% 78% 1275 980 1268 1011 2543 1991

4th 75% 78% 77% 1323 998 1387 1079 2710 2077

5th 71% 74% 73% 1198 847 1247 927 2445 1774

6th 92% 90% 91% 504 462 506 457 1010 919

7th 89% 92% 91% 536 477 594 547 1130 1024

8th 86% 89% 87% 796 684 722 640 1518 1324

Total 79% 81% 80% 5683 4487 5775 4706 11458 9193

76

%

77

%

75

%

71

%

92

%

89

%

86

%

88

%

80

%

78

%

74

%

90

%

92

%

89

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Perc

en

t in

HF

Z

Grade

Female Male



13

PUSH-UP

North Carolina



Grade


Female Male All

Female Male All

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

1st 49% 60% 55% 913 449 955 570 1868 1019

2nd 56% 68% 62% 1340 748 1323 900 2663 1648

3rd 54% 68% 61% 14668 7913 15411 10458 30079 18371

4th 52% 68% 60% 15070 7821 15638 10696 30708 18517

5th 48% 66% 57% 15294 7278 15815 10395 31109 17673

6th 61% 74% 67% 8225 4984 8137 6021 16362 11005

7th 63% 73% 68% 7610 4783 7780 5704 15390 10487

8th 64% 68% 66% 7581 4814 7631 5192 15212 10006

Total 55% 69% 62% 70701 38790 72690 49936 143391 88726

49

%

56

%

54

%

52

%

48

%

61

%

63

%

64

%

60

%

68

%

68

%

68

%

66

%

74

%

73

%

68

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Perc

en

t in

HF

Z

Grade

Female Male



14

PUSH-UP

Cumberland County



Grade


Female Male All

Female Male All

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

1st 63% 78% 71% 24 15 27 21 51 36

2nd 73% 86% 79% 51 37 51 44 102 81

3rd 49% 67% 58% 1235 611 1233 831 2468 1442

4th 46% 68% 57% 1264 581 1338 910 2602 1491

5th 42% 65% 54% 1161 490 1205 780 2366 1270

6th 63% 76% 69% 489 308 477 362 966 670

7th 59% 73% 67% 468 278 553 404 1021 682

8th 61% 71% 65% 686 416 622 440 1308 856

Total 51% 69% 60% 5378 2736 5506 3792 10884 6528

63

%

73

%

49

%

46

%

42

%

63

%

59

%

61

%

78

%

86

%

67

%

68

%

65

%

76

%

73

%

71

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Perc

en

t in

HF

Z

Grade

Female Male



15

SIT AND REACH

North Carolina



Grade


Female Male All

Female Male All

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

1st 76% 75% 76% 739 565 792 597 1531 1162

2nd 71% 73% 72% 1198 854 1147 834 2345 1688

3rd 65% 65% 65% 13580 8848 14245 9265 27825 18113

4th 64% 61% 62% 14008 8914 14557 8894 28565 17808

5th 63% 61% 62% 14016 8778 14390 8720 28406 17498

6th 58% 60% 59% 7432 4329 7376 4446 14808 8775

7th 62% 58% 60% 6849 4233 6971 4076 13820 8309

8th 66% 61% 63% 6769 4466 6950 4243 13719 8709

Total 63% 62% 63% 64591 40987 66428 41075 131019 82062

76

%

71

%

65

%

64

%

63

%

58

% 62

% 66

%

75

%

73

%

65

%

61

%

61

%

60

%

58

%

61

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Perc

en

t in

HF

Z

Grade

Female Male



16

SIT AND REACH

Cumberland County



Grade


Female Male All

Female Male All

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

1st NA NA NA 0 0 0 0 0 0

2nd 76% 66% 71% 51 39 50 33 101 72

3rd 56% 61% 59% 1203 677 1168 714 2371 1391

4th 59% 54% 57% 1218 720 1273 692 2491 1412

5th 55% 55% 55% 1104 604 1142 626 2246 1230

6th 27% 46% 37% 182 50 185 85 367 135

7th 32% 45% 39% 154 50 184 82 338 132

8th 43% 43% 43% 351 151 330 141 681 292

Total 54% 55% 54% 4263 2291 4332 2373 8595 4664

76

%

56

% 59

%

55

%

27

% 32

%

43

%

66

%

61

%

54

%

55

%

46

%

45

%

43

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Perc

en

t in

HF

Z

Grade

Female Male



17

TRUNK LIFT

North Carolina



Grade


Female Male All

Female Male All

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

1st 84% 79% 82% 950 799 960 761 1910 1560

2nd 85% 83% 84% 1398 1184 1349 1113 2747 2297

3rd 88% 87% 87% 14810 13027 15557 13474 30367 26501

4th 89% 86% 87% 15237 13546 15857 13572 31094 27118

5th 74% 70% 72% 15609 11565 16015 11169 31624 22734

6th 80% 78% 79% 8282 6608 8178 6411 16460 13019

7th 79% 79% 79% 7715 6111 7764 6111 15479 12222

8th 81% 79% 80% 7663 6232 7805 6187 15468 12419

Total 82% 80% 81% 71664 59072 73485 58798 145149 117870

84

%

85

% 88

%

89

%

74

% 80

%

79

%

81

%

79

% 83

% 87

%

86

%

70

%

78

%

79

%

79

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Perc

en

t in

HF

Z

Grade

Female Male



18

TRUNK LIFT

Cumberland County



Grade


Female Male All

Female Male All

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

Total FG

TM

Results N in HFZ

1st NA NA NA 0 0 0 0 0 0

2nd 82% 84% 83% 51 42 51 43 102 85

3rd 85% 85% 85% 1301 1100 1282 1084 2583 2184

4th 84% 81% 82% 1274 1069 1361 1100 2635 2169

5th 68% 65% 67% 1202 818 1223 795 2425 1613

6th 85% 91% 88% 448 383 456 417 904 800

7th 88% 84% 86% 478 420 555 468 1033 888

8th 84% 85% 84% 657 550 577 492 1234 1042

Total 81% 80% 80% 5411 4382 5505 4399 10916 8781

82

%

85

%

84

%

68

%

85

%

88

%

84

%

84

%

85

%

81

%

65

%

91

%

84

%

85

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Perc

en

t in

HF

Z

Grade

Female Male

ispod district report - cumberland 11apr09

Documents