hunting - lauer.sdsu.edulauer.sdsu.edu/courses/442-spring-2017/lectures/5.1.pdf · because of...
TRANSCRIPT
2/14/2017
1
1According to Siskind, the primary incentive for men in Amazonian societies to hunt game is to ________________?
A. Gain access to women.
B. Feed their father’s brother.
C. Keep the animal populations from outstripping the limited forest food resources.
D. Make the forest safer around the village.
2According to Siskand, what is the limiting ecological factor that results in a culturally produced scarcity of women among the Sharanahua?
A. Lack of fresh water.
B. A low density of game animals (protein).
C. Soil fertility.
D. Disease
3
Among the Yanomamö, the prescribed marriage partner is:
A. Determined by the headman.
B. A cross-cousin
C. A sexually mature person who has made a garden
D. From a distant village.
4
Hunting Traditional methods:
Bow and arrow (curare)
Blowgun (curare)
Spears
Clubs
Contemporary methods Rapid adoption of shotguns. Why? More efficient, shotgun:
1.60 kg/man-hour; bows, 0.53 kg/man-hour
Headlamps (night hunting)
5
Paca
Tapir
Guan
Other species:Monkeys, deer, peccary, caiman, snakes, sloths, capybara, slothMany types of birds
6
Protein debate
Background Chagnon publishes in 1968
Another prominent anthropologist, Marvin Harris, reads literature and comes up with theory to explain broad patterns.
2/14/2017
2
7
Protein debate
Patterns to be explained Mobile population
Micro and macro movements
Vast distances between Yanomamö villages
Unbalanced sex ratio ~120 men to 100 women
Endemic warfare
8
Protein debate
Harris proposes that protein is the limiting factor in Yanomamö society (Harris 1971, 1974)
Other anthropologists apply to all of Amazon
Argue against Carneiro’s idea of circumscription.
9
Protein debate
Why protein? Many Amazonian groups think meat is scarce and
very important.
10Tapir penis
11
Protein debate
Why Protein? Manioc satisfies energetic needs, but not protein
Amazon environment has low animal biomass, patchy distribution of animals, cryptic, easily over-hunted.
12
Protein debate Logic of argument:
Groups must limit population growth to assure they don’t exceed local ‘carrying capacity’, key limiting factor is protein (game availability).
Carrying capacity, Borrowed from biology: “The carrying capacity of a biological species in an environment is the population size of the species that the environment can sustain indefinitely, given the food, habitat, water and other necessities available in the environment”
2/14/2017
3
13
Protein debate
Harris argues that Yanomamö are at carrying capacity, maybe even exceeding it.
Evidence is in the unbalanced sex ratio They kill females to limit population
You need males to go out and hunt and defend hunting grounds.
Other evidence: most
Amazonian populations
are not expanding.
14
Protein debate Logic of argument:
To stay within carrying capacity certain cultural institutions will arise: Female biased infanticide High incidence of non-territory acquiring warfare High mobility Sex taboos that limit contact between men and women. Small settlements to limit impact of hunting Dispersed settlements Frequent movement of villages Violence
All are characteristic of Amazonian societies.
15
Chagnon’s rebuttal
Yanomamö eat plenty of protein, consuming ~50g/day
Other Amazonian societies consume adequate amount.
16
Protein debate
Later studies questioned the debate itself Not enough evidence on either side to make sound
conclusions.
Underestimated non-mammalian foods (birds, fish, reptiles, and especially invertebrates (worms)
17 18
Protein debate
Later studies questioned the debate itself Underestimated plant
proteins, Brazil nuts (13.2g/100g), cashew (15g), peach palm (~3g).
Debate does not take into account the size of pre-Columbian populations.
Cashew fruit and nut
2/14/2017
4
19
Protein debate
Native populations are a fraction of what they were in pre-Colombian times. Disease
Can current populations be used as a test bed for a protein hypothesis?
20
Protein debate
Conclusions that can be drawn from this discussion: Carrying capacity models are still with us because
they ask an important question: “What limits are their on Amazonian populations?”
But any one answer is probably simplistic.
Some anthropologists completely reject this kind of analysis. They argue that humans don’t follow models derived from biology.
21
Yanomamö politics
The feast
22Yanomamö Social Organization and
Social Structure
Shabono (village)
23Yanomamö Social Organization and
Social Structure
Shabono (village) Largest single groupings are
shabonos or "clearings." The people that occupy a given shabono are called the people of a given area, -teri.
Each section of it is built by a group of adult males, a father, his sons, and perhaps his brothers.
24
2/14/2017
5
25
Shabono
Typically a shabono is comprised of at least two lineages: a group of people who trace descent(transmission of kin-group membership) in a direct line through a common ancestor.
26Patrilineal Descent With a Male
Ego
27
The ‘ideal’ shabono
Two patrilineal lineages who trade sisters between them to supply wives to the other patrilineal line.
Because of SORORAL POLYGYNY andFEMALE INFANTICIDE linked to the need for men in warfare their often is an unbalanced sex ratio which pits brothers against each other for wives, and sometimes even fathers and sons against each other.
28
Who to marry in Yanomamöland?
Marriage patterns are based on four principles: lineage exogamy
bilateral cross cousin marriage
village endogamy
(sororal) polygyny
Marriage is mode of
lineage coupling.
29How does bi-lateral cross-cousin
marriage work?
Cousins whose parents are siblings of the opposite(cross) sex. Cross-cousins are important because in unilineal descent systems they are nevermembers of Ego’s own descent line.