helsingør - 4 june 2009 anders kofoed-wiuff, ea energy analyses
DESCRIPTION
Helsingør - 4 June 2009 Anders Kofoed-Wiuff, Ea Energy Analyses. Scope of the study. Phase I Overview of current energy situation Scenarios for the future regional energy system Phase II Detailed scenario analyses of the electricity and district heating markets - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Ea Energianalyse
Helsingør - 4 June 2009Anders Kofoed-Wiuff,Ea Energy Analyses
Helsingør - 4 June 2009Anders Kofoed-Wiuff,Ea Energy Analyses
Ea Energianalyse
Scope of the study• Phase I
– Overview of current energy situation– Scenarios for the future regional energy system
• Phase II– Detailed scenario analyses of the electricity and district
heating markets– Prioritized list of regional projects/polices to promote the
region as a sustainable region• Phase III
– Develop strategies for deployment– Regional knowledge sharing in the field of sustainable
energy– Outline the possibilities for the industry to be frontrunners
in the development of new energy technologies
Medio 2008 Medio 2009
Ea Energianalyse
HydroHydroNuclearBio
NuclearBioHydro
CoalNuclearWind
Coal
Hydro, Gas
Oilshale
Nuclear
CoalGasWind
GasCoalHydroNuclear
Expecte
d high economic
growth
GASOIL
GASOIL
Ea Energianalyse
Characteristics of the region
* Including only North East Germany and North West Russia
Ea Energianalyse
Characteristics of the region
0
5
10
15
20
25
1990 1995 2000 2005
TJ/M€ Energy intensity
Old democracies New democracies
Ea Energianalyse
How can the energy and transport systems in the region develop to achieve:I.50 % reduction of CO2 emissions in 2030 compared to 1990 II.50 % reduction in oil consumption in 2030 compared to 2005
Ea Energianalyse
• CCS• Nuclear power• Biomass
• Improved fuel economy
• Electric vehicles• Biofuels
• Energy savings• District heating - CHP• Biomass• Wind, wave, solar
• Improved fuel economy
• Electric vehicles• Modal-change• ICT
Two scenarios for 2030
Small-tech Big-tech
Energy
Transport
Ea Energianalyse
Results
-
2.000
4.000
6.000
8.000
10.000
12.000
14.000
16.000
2005 Reference 2030 Small-Tech Big-Tech
PJ
Gross energy consumption
Nuclear
RE
Natural gas
Coal
Oil
50% oil target
Ea Energianalyse
Results
-200
-
200
400
600
800
1.000
Mt CO2 / year Other energy
Electricity and district heatTransport
Storage CO2
Ea Energianalyse
Scope of the study• Phase I
– Overview of current energy situation– Scenarios for the future regional energy system
• Phase II– Detailed scenario analyses of the electricity and district
heating markets– Prioritized list of regional projects/polices to promote the
region as a sustainable region• Phase III
– Develop strategies for deployment– Regional knowledge sharing in the field of sustainable
energy– Outline the possibilities for the industry to be frontrunners
in the development of new energy technologies
Medio 2008 Medio 2009
Ea Energianalyse
Balmorel model• The Balmorel model determines based on
market principles and regulation:– generation of electricity and heat,
distinguished by technology and fuel– consumption of electricity and heat– electricity transmission– emissions– prices– optimal investments in generation capacity
given framework conditions and cost data– costs and benefits of alternative scenarios
The model is open source: www.balmorel.com
Ea EnergianalyseDE_CS
• Basic model contains 17 areas with transmission constraints
• For the purpose of this study data for Russia is included in the model
• North-West Russia– Karelia– Kola– Pskov– Kaliningrad Arkhangelsk– St. Petersburg incl .
Leningrad– Novgorod– Komi Data is obtained from publicly
available sourcesData is obtained from publicly available sources
Ea Energianalyse
Baseline scenario 2010-2030
• Fuel prices according to International Energy Agency - 120 $/bbl in 2030
• Targets– 2020: 21 % CO2 reduction, 20 % RE (national
targets)– 2030: 38 % CO2 reduction (50 % compared to
1990), 20 % renewable energy (national targets)
• Model decides new investments in generation capacity except nuclear and hydro power
• Country specific renewable energy sources
Ea Energianalyse
Development nuclear power
Ea Energianalyse
Baseline: InvestmentsSelected DRAFT results
Ea Energianalyse
Baseline: Electricity generation
Selected DRAFT results
Ea Energianalyse
CO2-emissions (Mill. tonnes)Selected DRAFT results
1990
2005
21%red 50%red
38%red
Ea Energianalyse
CO2 and RE pricesSelected DRAFT results
Shadow prices for CO2 target and RE target
Country
2020 2030
CO2
EUR/ton
RE
EUR/MWhel
CO2
EUR/ton
RE
EUR/MWhel
Denmark
5
9
59
-Estonia - -Finland 15 -
Germany 16 -Latvia 15 -
Lithuania 14 -Norway - -Poland - -Sweden 16 0.5Russia 13 -
CO2-priceThe cost in the model of additionally reducing one ton of CO2(may be interpreted as an estimate of the CO2-price)
RE-priceThe cost in the model of additionally increasing RE generation by one MWh(may be interpreted as an estimate of the cost of a RE certificate)
Ea Energianalyse
Ea Energianalyse
Sensitivity scenarios
• Regional renewable energy target• Increased energy efficiency (lower demand for
electricity, particularly for heating)
• Strong interconnectors• Stronger CO2 target in 2020 (30%@COP15)
• Case: Integrated off-shore grid at Kriegers Flak
Ea Energianalyse
Regional renewable targetSelected DRAFT results
Shadow prices for CO2 target and RE target
Country
2020 2030
CO2
EUR/ton
RE
EUR/MWhel
CO2
EUR/ton
RE
EUR/MWhel
Denmark
0 18 54 0
Estonia
Finland
Germany
Latvia
Lithuania
Norway
Poland
Sweden
Russia
Based on the model analyses it will be possible to quantify the benefits of a common a RE framework
Ea Energianalyse
Benefits of increasing thetransmission grid in the region
Selected DRAFT results
Germany Cen.
Germany NE
Germany NW
Denmark East
Denmark West Estonia Finland Lithuania Latvia
Norway M
Norway N
Norway Oslo
Norway S Poland Sweden M Sweden N Sweden S
Germany Cen. - 59.745 80.651 Germany NE 59.745 - 20.906 50.996 51.096 62.983 53.290 Germany NW 80.651 20.906 - 71.531 71.604 77.310 73.731 Denmark East 50.996 71.531 - 309 5.779 25.364 2.607 2.353 Denmark West 51.096 71.604 309 - 5.707 25.561 2.483 2.194 Estonia - 4.461 10.103 9.789 7.934 19.959 Finland 4.461 - 16.463 15.762 16.106 Lithuania 10.103 - 399 6.048 29.392 29.328 Latvia 9.789 399 - 6.407 29.473 29.409 Norway M - 244 3.506 200
Norway N 16.463 244 - 397 Norway Oslo 5.744 5.672 - 404 3.460 3.757 3.544
Norway S 77.310 5.707 3.506 404 - 3.343 3.475 Poland 100.468 62.983 25.364 6.048 6.407 - 23.400 Sweden M 2.607 2.483 19.959 15.762 29.392 29.473 3.460 3.343 - 344 322
Sweden N 16.106 200 397 3.757 3.475 344 -
Sweden S 53.290 73.731 2.353 2.194 29.328 29.409 3.544 23.400 322 -
Germany Cen.
Germany NE
Germany NW
Denmark East
Denmark West Estonia Finland Lithuania Latvia
Norway M
Norway N
Norway Oslo
Norway S Poland Sweden M Sweden N Sweden S
Germany Cen. - 59.745 80.651 100.468 Germany NE 59.745 - 20.906 50.996 51.096 62.983 53.290 Germany NW 80.651 20.906 - 71.531 71.604 77.310 73.731 Denmark East 50.996 71.531 - 309 5.779 25.364 2.607 2.353 Denmark West 51.096 71.604 309 - 5.707 25.561 2.483 2.194 Estonia - 4.461 10.103 9.789 7.934 19.959 Finland 4.461 - 16.463 15.762 16.106 Lithuania 10.103 - 399 6.048 29.392 29.328 Latvia 9.789 399 - 6.407 29.473 29.409 Norway M - 244 3.506 200
Norway N 16.463 244 - 397 Norway Oslo 5.744 5.672 - 404 3.460 3.757 3.544
Norway S 77.310 5.707 3.506 404 - 3.343 3.475 Poland 100.468 62.983 25.364 6.048 6.407 - 23.400 Sweden M 2.607 2.483 19.959 15.762 29.392 29.473 3.460 3.343 - 344 322
Sweden N 16.106 200 397 3.757 3.475 344 -
Sweden S 53.290 73.731 2.353 2.194 29.328 29.409 3.544 23.400 322 -
Germany Cen.
Germany NE
Germany NW
Denmark East
Denmark West Estonia Finland Lithuania Latvia
Norway M
Norway N
Norway Oslo
Norway S Poland Sweden M Sweden N Sweden S
Germany Cen. - 59.745 80.651 100.468 Germany NE 59.745 - 20.906 50.996 51.096 62.983 53.290 Germany NW 80.651 20.906 - 71.531 71.604 77.310 73.731 Denmark East 50.996 71.531 - 309 5.779 25.364 2.607 2.353 Denmark West 51.096 71.604 309 - 5.707 2.483 2.194 Estonia - 4.461 10.103 9.789 7.934 19.959 Finland 4.461 - 16.463 15.762 16.106 Lithuania 10.103 - 399 6.048 29.392 29.328 Latvia 9.789 399 - 6.407 29.473 29.409 Norway M - 244 3.506 200
Norway N 16.463 244 - 397 Norway Oslo 5.744 5.672 - 404 3.460 3.757 3.544
Norway S 77.310 5.707 3.506 404 - 3.343 3.475 Poland 100.468 62.983 25.364 6.048 6.407 - 23.400 Sweden M 2.607 2.483 19.959 15.762 29.392 29.473 3.460 3.343 - 344 322
Sweden N 16.106 200 397 3.757 3.475 344 -
Sweden S 53.290 73.731 2.353 2.194 29.328 29.409 3.544 23.400 322 -
€/MW capacity, in 2020, in the baseline scenario
Connections linking the thermal power based systems in Poland and Germany and the Nordic
power system dominated by hydro power have the highest value.
Strengthening connections between theBaltic countries and Scandinavia also appear
attractive.
Further analyses are needed
Ea Energianalyse
Preliminary observations
• The targets set-out can be achieved given the RE resources available (stronger targets could be met)
• Wind power appears to be the most cost-efficient measure (however more detailed analyses required)
• Benefits of increasing strengthening the transmission grid in the region
• Benefits of cooperation on achieving RE targets
Ea Energianalyse
Scope of the study• Phase I
– Overview of current energy situation– Scenarios for the future regional energy system
• Phase II– Detailed scenario analyses of the electricity and district
heating markets– Prioritized list of regional projects/polices to promote the
region as a sustainable region• Phase III
– Develop strategies for deployment– Regional knowledge sharing in the field of sustainable
energy– Outline the possibilities for the industry to be frontrunners
in the development of new energy technologies
Medio 2008 Medio 2009
WorkshopEnergizing the sustainable growth in the Region
Kaliningrad10-11 June 2009
Ea Energianalyse
Recommendations
• Develop a shared vision A Green Valley of Europe in order to mobilize the strong traditions in the region for public-private co-operation.
• Establish an energy stakeholder forum that includes different cross-border, cross-sector and cross-level actors. Not least the private sector needs a larger international platform in order to go beyond small markets.
• Develop regional projects which could benefit the region as a showcase for comprehensive and sustainable energy systems including R&D and demonstration activities.
• Develop a common interconnector strategy for the region to allow for a higher level of renewable energy penetration including from offshore wind power.
• Launch an action plan for efficient and sustainable heating, involving the larger cities in the region and the district heating companies.
• Establish a common regional training programme to strengthen the capacities in energy planning. Such a programme should aim at developing the exchange of experiences and best practices among officials at local and national level.
Ea Energianalyse
THANK YOU
Ea Energianalyse
Ea Energianalyse
Analyses
Leading to a synthesis scenarios for the region based on the outcome of the analyses and subsequent discussions of the results with key stakeholders in the region
(-50 % comp. to 1990)
Ea Energianalyse
Fuel prices
• In accordance the latest projection of the International Energy Agency
Biomass/waste: -2,5 to 12 €/GJ
Long-term oil price:App. 120 USD/bbl
Ea Energianalyse
* excl. North West Russia
Ea Energianalyse
RE targets 2020
• Assuming, that the absolute share of renewable energy in electricity consumption should increase 1.5 times more than the overall share of renewable energy.
Ea Energianalyse
Electricity demand
Ea Energianalyse
Wind power potentials
Ea Energianalyse
Based on the model analyses it will be possible to quantify the benefits of a common a RE framework
Ea Energianalyse
Selected DRAFT results
To the consumer price should be added to the cost of RE subsidies/certificates
Ea Energianalyse
Benefits of increasing thetransmission grid in the region
Selected DRAFT results
Germany Cen.
Germany NE
Germany NW
Denmark East
Denmark West Estonia Finland Lithuania Latvia
Norway M
Norway N
Norway Oslo
Norway S Poland Sweden M Sweden N Sweden S
Germany Cen. - 59.745 80.651 Germany NE 59.745 - 20.906 50.996 51.096 62.983 53.290 Germany NW 80.651 20.906 - 71.531 71.604 77.310 73.731 Denmark East 50.996 71.531 - 309 5.779 25.364 2.607 2.353 Denmark West 51.096 71.604 309 - 5.707 25.561 2.483 2.194 Estonia - 4.461 10.103 9.789 7.934 19.959 Finland 4.461 - 16.463 15.762 16.106 Lithuania 10.103 - 399 6.048 29.392 29.328 Latvia 9.789 399 - 6.407 29.473 29.409 Norway M - 244 3.506 200
Norway N 16.463 244 - 397 Norway Oslo 5.744 5.672 - 404 3.460 3.757 3.544
Norway S 77.310 5.707 3.506 404 - 3.343 3.475 Poland 100.468 62.983 25.364 6.048 6.407 - 23.400 Sweden M 2.607 2.483 19.959 15.762 29.392 29.473 3.460 3.343 - 344 322
Sweden N 16.106 200 397 3.757 3.475 344 -
Sweden S 53.290 73.731 2.353 2.194 29.328 29.409 3.544 23.400 322 -
Germany Cen.
Germany NE
Germany NW
Denmark East
Denmark West Estonia Finland Lithuania Latvia
Norway M
Norway N
Norway Oslo
Norway S Poland Sweden M Sweden N Sweden S
Germany Cen. - 59.745 80.651 100.468 Germany NE 59.745 - 20.906 50.996 51.096 62.983 53.290 Germany NW 80.651 20.906 - 71.531 71.604 77.310 73.731 Denmark East 50.996 71.531 - 309 5.779 25.364 2.607 2.353 Denmark West 51.096 71.604 309 - 5.707 25.561 2.483 2.194 Estonia - 4.461 10.103 9.789 7.934 19.959 Finland 4.461 - 16.463 15.762 16.106 Lithuania 10.103 - 399 6.048 29.392 29.328 Latvia 9.789 399 - 6.407 29.473 29.409 Norway M - 244 3.506 200
Norway N 16.463 244 - 397 Norway Oslo 5.744 5.672 - 404 3.460 3.757 3.544
Norway S 77.310 5.707 3.506 404 - 3.343 3.475 Poland 100.468 62.983 25.364 6.048 6.407 - 23.400 Sweden M 2.607 2.483 19.959 15.762 29.392 29.473 3.460 3.343 - 344 322
Sweden N 16.106 200 397 3.757 3.475 344 -
Sweden S 53.290 73.731 2.353 2.194 29.328 29.409 3.544 23.400 322 -
Germany Cen.
Germany NE
Germany NW
Denmark East
Denmark West Estonia Finland Lithuania Latvia
Norway M
Norway N
Norway Oslo
Norway S Poland Sweden M Sweden N Sweden S
Germany Cen. - 59.745 80.651 100.468 Germany NE 59.745 - 20.906 50.996 51.096 62.983 53.290 Germany NW 80.651 20.906 - 71.531 71.604 77.310 73.731 Denmark East 50.996 71.531 - 309 5.779 25.364 2.607 2.353 Denmark West 51.096 71.604 309 - 5.707 2.483 2.194 Estonia - 4.461 10.103 9.789 7.934 19.959 Finland 4.461 - 16.463 15.762 16.106 Lithuania 10.103 - 399 6.048 29.392 29.328 Latvia 9.789 399 - 6.407 29.473 29.409 Norway M - 244 3.506 200
Norway N 16.463 244 - 397 Norway Oslo 5.744 5.672 - 404 3.460 3.757 3.544
Norway S 77.310 5.707 3.506 404 - 3.343 3.475 Poland 100.468 62.983 25.364 6.048 6.407 - 23.400 Sweden M 2.607 2.483 19.959 15.762 29.392 29.473 3.460 3.343 - 344 322
Sweden N 16.106 200 397 3.757 3.475 344 -
Sweden S 53.290 73.731 2.353 2.194 29.328 29.409 3.544 23.400 322 -
€/MW capacity, in 2020, in the baseline scenario
Ea Energianalyse
Next steps
• Final report by June 2009• Presentation of results at
– WS: Energizing the sustainable growth in the Region, Kaliningrad, 10-11 June
– 4 June, Copenhagen, Foreign Ministers • Phase III
– Unfold the potentials identified in the scenario analyses through stakeholder activities and further analyses
– A synthesis scenario for the BSR– Cooperation with Nordic Energy Perspectives
Medio 2008 Medio 2009
Ea Energianalyse
Comments to BSPC report
• Involve the stakeholders in the region• Establish concrete activities on specific topics
– Opportunities for CHP in the big cities around the Baltic– Common plan for off-shore wind in the BS– Action plan for the utilization of municipal waste and
biogas for energy purposes– Information and communication technologies to replace
physical transportation• Mention Kriegers Flak as a showcase for the Baltic
Sea Region• Education of the new energy planners• Highlight the role of the cities as key to the
implementation of energy and climate policies