,* f l -&' =. In t e rna t i cd Seminar of - i d Sport Cul turt and Achielremes\t

"Global Isszres ofSpsrt Science & S D O ~ ~ Tecl-nology Devel'opm en t"

International Seminar of Sport Culture and Achievement "Global Issues of Sport Science & Sport Technor'ogy Devslopment"

Proceedings

Publisher Faculty of Sport Sciences

Yogyakarta State University

Reviewer Dr. Lim Peng Han

Dr. Gunathevan AIL Elumalai Dr. Acbara Soachalerm Dr. Panggung Sutapa

Dr. Siswantoyo Erwin Setyo Kriswanto, M.Kes. Bambang priyonoadi, M.Kes.

Editor Ssryono, M.Or.

Soni Nopembri, M.Pd. Nur Sita Utami, M.Or. Satya Perdana, 5.5.

Design & Lay Out Suqeng S~ria Nugroho, A.Md.

Secretariat: Yogyakarta State llniversiv, Indonesia Telo: +62274 550307

Email: issca-201 %uny.ac.id - Website: seminar.uny.ac.id/issc~20 14

The paper published in the proceeding is not necessarily a reflection of the attitude or opinion of the editor and executive, ed:tor, expert editors and the responsibility for the contents or ~ffect of the writing, still lies on the author.

Article published in the proceeding is considered valid by the certificate i~cluded in the prese~tation.

ISBN 978-607-8429-66-5 -

p4@m I! International Seminar of f - Sport Culture and Achievement

"Global issues ofsport Science Rr Sport Technology Development"

Di4prbitkan Oleh:

Fakultas !lmu Keolahragaan Universitas; Negeri Yogyakarta

PA April 2014

preface

Salam Olahraga!

Praise and be grateful to the Lord, so that this proceeding can be issued.The In ternational Semisar of Sport Culti~re and Achievement with "Global Issues of Sporl Science I t Technology Snort Developmentn theme is held on 23rd- 24th 4pril2014 at Yogyak~rta State Lniversity Hotel. 'he seminar isconducted by Faculty of Sport Sci;.nce,Yogyakarta State 'Jniversity.

The seminar was conducted in order to enliven the 50th anniversary of Yogyakarta State University.The Seminar aims at revealing any growing sport pc~tentials and recent woilwide research results. There are three pillars of sport: recreational spo-ts, physicill education/ sports pedagogy, and ellite sport that in common have one goal to form characters and support achievement.

Hopefully, the publication of this prcceeding can bring benefits t-:, the participants in particular and readers in general. Final words for all thme who have helped th;s seminar, we-thank you.

Preface

Assalammualc~ikum Warrah Matullahi Wabavkatuh

The honorable speakers, Prof. Dr. Djoko Pekik Irianto, M.Kes. AlFO (Deputy of Achievemvnt Improvement of Sport and Youth Ministry), Dr. Wayne Cotton (Au-,tralia), Dr. Jo5.e Vicente Garcia Jimenez (Spain), Dr. Achara Soachalerm 'Thailand), Dr. Lim Peng Han (Cingapore), and Dr. Gunathevan A/L Elmulai (Malaysia).The distinguished guests.

First of all, on behalf of the committee of the International Seminar of Sport Culture and Achievement, let me express great thank to God Allah SWT who gives us opportunity and hea th, so that wecan join this international seminar on sport cultureand achievement. it is my pleasur~hto welcome you to the International Seminar of Sport Culture and Achievement in Faculty of Sp3rt ScienceYogyakarta State University.

The international seminar is in order to c~lebrate the 50th anniversary c~f Yogyakarta State University. In this opportunity, we invite fitre speakers from five countries; they are from Spain, AustraIia,Thailand, Singaporeland Mslaysia.The participants of the seminarar? 250 participant;.

Finally, allow me to express my gratitude to all audiences, especially the honorable speakers snd the distinguished guests for paying attention to this seminar. I hops that the seminar will run ~nrell and be succesrful.

Thank you very much.

Wassalamualuikum Warrahmatullahi IVabamkatuh

24d April 201 1 airman of ISSCA,

Panggung Sutapa, P.S.

*-..

CONTENT

..................................................................................................... Cover Preface .................................................................................................. Content ................................................................................................... Keynote Speaker .......................................................................................

.......................................................................................... Guess Speakers

Manipulative Motions of 2010 Academic Ycxr PPJKR Shtdents Ability of Net "ea.;hing Lecturing Amat Komari, Yo~yakarta State Unikersity, Indonesia .......................................... Ability of Physical Education Teachers in lm~lementing ],earning Outdoor Education (Studies In Outdoor Education Trainees) Aris Fajar Pambudi, Yogyakarta State Uniwrsity, Indonesia ................................... Designing Physical Education (PE:) Learning Using Scientific Approach Aris Priyanto. Sport and Youth Department l,'ogyakarta, Indonesia ........................... A Cornparati\ e Sh~dy on Sport Education Concept And Movement Education Co.lcept in Physical Education Teacher Education: an Over View on Existenci;il Phenomeno'ogy BambangAbduldjabar, Spehe University of F'ducation, Indonesia ............................. Playing Aids and Early Childhood Motor Skill in Kindergarten Banu Setyo Adi, Yogyakarta State Universit!,, Indonesia ........................................ The Effect of Traditional Games To-ard Phpical Fitness Elementary School Students DewiSeptaliza, Bina Darma University, Indonesia ................................................ The Human Resource Profile of Early Chilj'1ood Education (PAU3) Teacher for Motoric Aspect of Early Childhood Children Endang Rini Sukamti, Yogyakarta State Uni\.ersity. Indonesia .................................. Big Ball Game Modification for Learning Physical Education A Erlina Lisparini, Yogyakarta State University. Indonesia .................................. School as Sport Health Promotion Place to !rr~prove Students Health Level Erwin SetyoKriswanto, Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia ............................... The lnfluenct of Ixarning Pattern and Adversity Quotient towards the Achievement of Javelin-Throw Lesson after Controlling Student Previous Knowledge I&h2kssPadang State University, Indoncria .................................................. Knowledge Level Students PJKR C Forces 201 1 about Violations and Penaltii:~ in Football Game Nurhadi Santoso, Yogyakarta State Lrniversity, Indonesia ...................................... Study of Information Systems Material Strength Training Program Fitness Activities for Elementary School Children Ranu Baskorn Aji Putra, Semarang State University, lndonesia ............................. Learning Model of Physical Education Using Multiple Intelegenscies Approaches and Influence on Creativity Development Roesdiyanto, State University Of Malang, Indonesia ......................................................... The Theory of Achievement Motivation Ellic.,t Model in A Physical Educatior Siti Hajar. Tunas Pembangunan Uni\.ersity. Indonesia .......................................... Outcome-Based Evaluation of Kasetsart University Students Participated in Cuthor Education Camp Program Suvimol Tangsujjapoj, Kasetsart Universitj.. Thailand .......................................... The Performance of Health and Physical Edk~cation Teachers in Government 13le~nentar-y Schools Graduated from Opened UniversiQ of lndonesia in Purworejo Triyono, Open University of Indonesia, Indonesia ............................................... Analysis Factors Related to Ovenveiu,ht at Student of Junior High School WildaWelis, hdang State University, Tndoriesia ................................................. Designing Motor Learning in Physical Education at Schools

Yudanto, Yogvakarta State University. lndoriesia ............................................... Game Volleyball Preparing Attack for Sport and Health Education Learning for First Class in Junior High School Yuyun Ari Wibowo, Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia .................................. The Understanding Level of Tactic and Stratqy of Basketball Game in PJKR Stitdents of FIK UNY Tri Ani Hastuti, Yogyakarta State Universitj.. lndonesia ........................................ The Influence of Exercise the Barrier Z-lops on Crossing at Students Young Indonesian Soccer Football Club in Palembang Ahmad Richard Victorian, Bina Darrna Uni~.c.rsity, Indonesia .................................

Validity and Reliability of Futsal Skil! Test Agus Susworo Dwi Marhaendro, Yogyakartcl State University. Indonesia ................... Physical Exercise for TennisAthlete w.ithWeight Tmining Ahmad Nasru,loh, Yogyakarta State IJniversity, Indonesia ..................................... A Review Nutrition Intake before Competetion and Factors Influencing Women's Swimming Athletes in Swimming Cli>b Padang Anton ~ornainil. Tika sebrina2 Padang State University, Indonesia .............................................................. Physical Exercise fbr Early childhood Taekwondo Devi Tirtawirya, Yogyakarta State Universiry, Indonesia ..................................... Correlation Between Protein, Fat and Carbohydrate with Arm Power and Leg ?o\ver in Pencak Silat Combative Pelatda DIY Athlet? Dwi wahyuningsihl, B.M Wara Kushartanti '. Arta ~armawatij, B.J. Istiti Kandarina3, Mirza Hapsari Sakti Titis penggalih5 Gadjah Mada university', Yogyakarta State llniversity 2; GadiahMsda ~ n i v e r s i t ~ ~ ' ; Indonesia ......................................................................................... Comparasion of Body Composition and Somatotype Characteristics of Sprinter Athletes at AUE and YSU Eddy ~urnomo', Nori.katsu Kasuga2, I-iideki 5uzuki3 I Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia; 2.".9icki University Of Education, lapan ......... Identification of Management Standards 1nfr;structure and Facilities Management Fencing Organization in Yogyakarta Faidillah Kumiawan, Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia ................................ ACTN3 R577x Polymorphism and Body Composition Profile of bidonesian Karate Athletes Rachmah Laksmi Ambardini. Yogyakarta St:lte University, Indonesia ....................... Development of Learning Media Movement Rhytmic Activity Model for Students SD Form VCD Siti Nurrochmah, Tatok Sugianto, Sn' Purnsmi, State University of Malang, Indonesia .... Revitilizing Sepaktakraw Ninja Smach Using Hanging Ball and Mattress I Ketut Semarayasa, Education University ol'Ganesha, Indonesia ............................ Menstruation and Female Athlete's Performance Indah Prasetyawati Tri Purnama Sari. Yogyakarta State IJniversity. Indonesia .............. Identification of Hydration Status wirh Urine Profile Measurement and Drink Consumption In PencakSilat Athlete In Yopakarta State Universily Inna ~achmawati'. NeniTrilusiana ~ahmavl:lti', MirzaHapsariSaktiTitis Penggalih', B.J. lstiti ~andarina".GadjahMada University, Indonesia ............................................. Model of Mental Training for Swimming Alhletes Juriana, Jakarta State University, Indonesia ..................................................... The Implementation of Physical and Health Education i n School Kamal Firdaus, State University Of Dadang. Indonesia ........................................ The Factor That Affects Participants of Kasetsart Un.iversity's Thai-Sword Competition

Kanlapruk ~o l som' and Dr. Achara ~oachalcrm' Kasetsart ~niversity'.~, Thailand .................................................................... Measuring Service Satisfaction in TirtaKirann's Swimming Pool Kurnia Tahki' And ~ur iana~, Jakarta S-ates t'niversity, Indonesia ............................. The Effects of Isotonic Drink, Coconut Water, and Plain Water on Hydration Stan~s of Football Athlete by Urine Profile Viewing Mirza Hapsari Sakti Titis Penggalih. Ma Ferma\vati, Retno Sutomo, Muhammad Nurhadi, Wiryatun Lestariana, Muhammad luffi-ie, Lisandra hlaria Goretti, Hamarn Hadi, Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia ...................................................... Relationship Between Percentage of Body Fst and Somarorype Ath1;tes of Per~cak Silat Combative Class Regional Training (PELATDA) Daerah Istimewa Yogyakartit Nadia Hanun ~ a r n l t i ' , B.J. lstiti Kandarina2. Arts ~annawati" Mina Hapsari !;akti Titis penggalih4, Gadjahmada University, Indonesia ................................................... The Analysis of the Physical Condition, Will Pencak Silat Construction Training Center Students (PPLP) of West Sumatra Nurul Ihsan, Padang State University, Indonesia ................................................. Understanding "Sports Hernia" (Athletic Pu5algia) as A Chronic G-oin Injury in Athletes Sendhi Tristanti Puspitasari State University of Malang, Indonesia ............................................................. A Study on Achievement Motivation by Gymnastics Floor Atfilete's in Sijunj~ng Regency Sri Gusti Handayani, Padang State Universit!, Indonesia ....................................... Effect of Stress and Anxiety Swimming Performance Athletes Sungkowo, Semarang State Universitv, Indonesia ................................................ Effect of Sensitivity Proprioceptive and Plytvnetric Trainning for Jr~mp Serve Success or7 Volleyball Syarif Hidayat, Ganesha Education University, Indonesia ...................................... Analysis of the Grand Strategy of Na~ional :Sport Performance Dev;lopment of 2014 - 2024 Wawan S. Su'lerman, Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia ................................. ' T o Practice, Watch Only": Sport in Consumer Society Anirotul Qoriah, Semarang State Universitj . Indonesia ......................................... The Field of 1,ecturers Expertise Based on Sport Science Development Bambang ~r i~onoad i ' , satyono', & Soni ~ o p e m b r i ~ , State University o f ~o~yakar ta ' .~ . ' . Indonesia ............................................................................................. Correlation oCNutrition Status and Dysmenorrhea Painfkl to Fema'e Students Sp~r t s Science Departemet Faculty of Sport Science Yogyakarta State University Cerika Rismayanthi, Yogyakarta State Uniiwsity, Indonesia .................................. Warming-Up Exercises for Mini-Vol leybal: DanangWicaksono, Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia .................................... Gateball as An Alternative Sport to hlaintain Physical Fitness of E'derly Fatkurahman Arjuna, Yogyakarta State Unia ersity, Indonesia ................................. Survey of the Understanding Level of Physical Education Teachen to Design Gsmes in Elemantap Schools in Malang Febrita P. ~ e ~ n o e k ' , Sri pumami2, Dona S:indy y3, State Universily Of Malang, ~ndonesia'.~.~ ............................................................................................ Changes in Blood Lactic Acid Levels after Active, Corstability, and Passive F:ecovery

.................... Hajar Danarc'ono, Tunas Pembangunan Unhersity Surakarta, Indo~esia The Role of Branched Chain Amino .4cids ;I% Dietary Sports Supplzments I Made satyawan', I Wayan ~ r t a n a ~ ~ a ' , Cianesha Education Unikersity, lndonesia'.' ..... The Effect of Side Jump Sprint Training with 1 :3 and 1 :5 Work: Rest Relief Ratio on Leg Muscle Power I Nyoman Sudarmada, Ganesha Education I .niversity, Indonesia ............................

Marketing Strategies of Tubing Sports to Increased Tourist to Visit Bali I Wayan Mul'arta, Kadek Yogi Parta1,esmam. Ganesha Education University, Indonesin The Importance of Emotional Maturity and tlie Abilityt on Think Positive for Athletes Komarudin, Yogyakarta State University, Inc!onesia ........................................................ The Effects of Training and Achivement Motivation on Vertical Jumping Ability Muslimin, Bina Darma University Palemban5, Indonesia .................................................. Integrated Physical Education in The Conte.. t of 201 3 Indonesian Primary Sct~ool Curriculum Soni ~ o ~ e m b r i ' , saryono2, & Ahmatl ~ i t h a r ~ d i n ' . ~ o ~ ~ a k a r t a State Universitj. ~ndonesial,~'~ .......................................................................................... The Effect of Aerobic and Anaerobic Exerci~es on Premenstrual S:/ndrome (PM!;) (Experimental Study On Students FibUnp) Umar Padang State University, Indonesia ........................................................ Neutrophils Percentage after Consuming Red Guava Juice (PsidiumGuajava L. Red c'ultivar) During Aerob c Exercise Yuliana Noor Setiawati ~ l v i e ' , sugiarto2. '~utrition Study Program, University of Muhammadiyah Semarang '~aculty Of Sport Science, Semarang State Universip ........

THE INFLUENCE OF LEARNING PATTERN AND, ADVERSITY QUOTIENT TOWARDS THE ACHIEVEMENF OF JA.VELIPI-THROW

LESSON AFTER CONTROLLING STUDENT PREVIOUS KYOWLEDGE

lshak Aziz

Padang State University, Indonesia 60.ishakaziz@gmail.com

Abstract The objectke of this study is to find oiit the difference between learning pattern and i dversity quotient. The research was conducted in the Faculty of Sport Science, Universil~s hlegeri Pad~ng. This was an experimental research, using 2 X 2 treatment by level. Mu'i Stage Ra~dom Sanipling was used because the mpulations were only 1 12 students. 56 shldentc were for reciprocal learning pattern and 56 students 'or command learning pattern. The experiment was on the inflqence of f e a r n i ~ ~ : pattern and adversity quotient towards the achievement of javelin-throw lesson after controlli?g the tudents' previous knowledge. There are seven conclusions in this research. They art:: 1 ) after controlling the students' previous knowledge, the achitnrement of reciprocal learning 3anern was hig'ier than command lesrning pattern, 2) after controlling the students' previous knowled!;e, the achie\ ,:merit of student's javelin-throw leaming process thnt has high adversity quotient wva; h:tter than low ones, 3) after controlling the students' previous I.nowledge, there was an influetitisl interaction between student's learning pattern and adversity qi~otient towarcls the achievement of j~velin-throw lesson, 4) after controlling the students' prwlious <nowledge of students, the achievement of javelin-throw lesson of student. with reciprocal pattern w~ls higher than the students who has high ac'versit?l quotient with comm~nd pattern, 5) after controllino, the students' previl~us knowledge, the achie\c.ment of students who used reciprocal pattern was iower than those with command 3arern and low iclversity quotient in the javelin-throw lesson, 6 ) after controlling the students' previous knowledge, the achievement ofjavelin-throw learning process of students with hiqh adversity quotient was bc~tter than the students with low adversity quotient ie the reciprocal pattern, and 7) after controlling the ,tudents' previous knowledge, the achievement of javelin-throw learning process uith command nattern of students with high adversity quotient way lower than the students with low adversity quot ent. The research results imply that the achievement of students should kc improved through assistntship of lecturers usiqg appropriate learning patternc.

Keywords: learning pattern, adversity quotient, the achievement of discus-throw lesson. previous knowledge

RVTRODUCTION Soedijarto (2000:34) says that, educntion must be put on rhe top priority of most irnrortant to

build a better generation of nation. It meaw every efforts must b- exert to r ~ a + e people tha! has good quality. This symptoms has effect that the rise of competition between individwd to other, a country to another country within the result that the cxffort to rise the quality of human rc:sourccs is become top priority. It 1s the strategic function of ordinance No. 20 Year 2003 abolrt educational sxqtem has benefit to expand the ability and make -lie better behavior ant1 national civilization. Bscd on the national ordinance, in Sport Scienze Faclslty, State Llniversity Padang tht: lecture is ma1 ng to be optimal by using every activity. There is t plan before the lecturz based on the syllabus; th? lesson is given by a team that routinely conduct the discussion ahout rhe strategy of teaching, st-ategy to increase students motivation, and ring h u t the program evaluation. However, the final score of student is decreased lately, especially in athletic lecture, javelin tlirow subject. It makcs some opinions from another, someone says that the meacurement quality and quantity of practice instruml:nt is not complete enough, another says the basic €kills of stuclent i. ve? low. The method is not appropriate that is used. The learning pattern that tlie lecturer used is not iuitable with student.. Hovr~ver, it is

68

necessary to conduct the research to :~cknov\.ledge the factors that make the final score ofjavelin throw subject are low.

Learning is the effort to use eveq facility and resource internal or external to someone's development. Learning is not only to develop cognitive one?, ho\irever affecti\.c, and psychotnotor is also included. It has purpose to receive i~formation, comprehension of something or to rrl.hieve a expertise (Anarinno, 1980: 39). Saffr!t (200'': 39) says that learnin{: has three fac*.ors, they are: process, constant change and there is a change causc,d by experience. Based on those orinions above, i t can be concluded that learning is the relation of change that happened in aspect of someone per;onality, emotional and physically. Those indicators show the ability as thc result of earning is in variant; the simple ones into the complex ones. it also acknowledged as learning outcomes. It is every ability and result that achieved that measured by using leaming process and indicated in numeric?! output (Briggs, 1979: 7). Bloom (1 98 1: 7) says that learning outcomes is the change result of behn~iior into three aspects, they are cognitive; (1) knowlcdge, (2) Compre'lension, (3) Applicxtion, (1) Analysis, (5) Synthesis, and (6) Evaluation. Knowlee!re, comprehension, arrd application is categorize as low cognitive ability. Affective aspect such as: ( I ) Acceptance. (2) Attention, ( 3 ) Reaction, (4) Acl~ptation, (5) Appreciation, and (6) Control. Psychnrnotor aspect such as: (I) Imitation, (2) Utilizn.ion, (3) Carefulness, (4) Coordination and (5) Nzituralization. Harrow ill Slavin (1991 : 497) say.; that by making ( I ) reflect movement, (2) f11ndam:ntal movement, (3 ) perceptual abiliiy, (4) Physir:~l ability such as: weight lifting, long distance cyc'ing, (5) accustomed movement avd (6) cornmt nication without discc~urse are prominent. Another dominance aspect in javelin throw subject is psychomotor or motor ability. The characteristic of motor ability after follow up the lesson is, Kiram (19()!i: 18): 1) says that I) first phase of motor is devclopment and masterir~g coordin;itien roul;hly. 2 second learning phase, development and coordi?:ition mastery softly, and 3) thirc! phase of le: rning is stabilizing coordination ability and formetl a skills. The learning outcome motor lesson is :i human activity to change the behavior in trxining process to achieve ability. It means, it is nccessap to have motor learning process.

Uno (2007:191) says that behaviornl change that apoears toward the object is concrete. This inspection has been formed as movement hirsed on material. A lecturer gives an order lo studcnts to do that movement is a stimulus and str!dent \\;!Io use their thought u hen that mo\.c:ment do is a response and the result is concrete. It has relation with javelin throw subject. After the lecturer give the example of movement, the student should lry it in order to their technique is berer than befort*. Javelin throw is one of athletic number that appcar in old Greek sporrs competit~ior.. It is throw i?g long- cylindrical with measured weight thing that formed like bamboo and has msde by using metal as the material. It is done by releasing the,iavelin by using single hand that posed on the side of boc'y. It has purpose to achieve longest distance Sy releasing it from the tip of fingers bas2d on the rules.

Willpower and endurance is important in this sport. llusdnrta (2010::i2) says that wi'lpower is kind of will to achieve something I ~ t t e r than before. It means tile will is coming from the inside of individual that acknowledge as motive. R'otive means a power that individual has that mal-e him or her to do something. It means motive is movement capacity that appear inside subject in orjer to do some activity to achieve some purpose (l'l~rwanto, 2010 : 62). In order to achieve that purqose, the willpower is necessary to exist inside individual mind. Stoltz (2005:6-7: s~.ys that thew are four benefit of willpower, they are: ( I ) ~villpo\\cr explains how far someone can face the trouble and their ability to face it: (2) willpower can predict which one can survive or not, (3) willpower c?n predict which one can exceed their limit and fail. (4) willpower can predict which one can give u? and not. Someone ability to face diff~culty, he or she must have surviv.il instinct ins;de the mind. because. someone achievement is not only measured by using !heir intelligent:, however willpower is important too. In another word, willpower recently appear in the necessig to achieve son:*:thing by empowering his or her own self (Bo~npa, 1998 : 436). It means, willpower can be indicatecl by using four indicators: ( I ) control. (2) con"ession. ( 3 ) ability range. and (4) endurance. It means wi'power in this research is student's ability to response the difticulhr thar they face Djamarah (2007:5) says strategy can be defined as general motive of learning and teaching into fo1.w zlspects: a) identify and state the specification and qualification oC student's behavioral change. B) i:o choose learning process theory based on aspiration and life view of people. c) to choose and state the procedure, m(.thod and learning technique and d) state the rules and minimal limit of achievement to do learning cvaluarion program. Muston and Ashworth (2310 : 37) says that learning strategy in Ilis way is by gik ing some

69

tasks to students to train with partner and cliange the role silnulta~eously. Tl~ero is a time the student becomes a subject and observer b} using the instructional purpose that tile teacher stated before. Reciprocal learning pattem is the irldividml in class is orqanizcd in groups. The teacher qive the group's tasks as doer (d) and observer (or, the lecturer can play the role as someone M l o gives explanation to every group about what shnuld they do. The taik of doer is similar with learning pattern; communication by using observation. The task of observer is give a feedback to coer and communicate to lecturer. Lecturer task is watch closely both of doer and observer, hour?ver the communication is only with obsener (Byra , 2006 : 11). The observer shoi~ld give the ieedback simultaneously to the doer by using a work paper that formed by lecturer

Meanwhile, in command learning p:lttern, every decision Is taken try lecturer absoll~tely. In another hand, the lecturer communicates every decision for every part/episocle/process i n learning process. Lutnn (1988: 128) says that command learning pattem i i teaching guide that lectur: use by giving material as training pattem per part. In this learning pattem, the irrpo-tant elernenlc are the lecturer demonstrates when he or she give. the material to the student and th: student giver enough time to practice. RESEARCH METHOD

Based on the problem and operational purpose of research, this research is using deign t-eatment by level 2 X 2 methodologies. This method is chosen in order to observe the el'fect b!. using learning pattern, after the learning pattern is implemented at least six times, it will be done ;I test o f javelin throw.

Sampling technique is using 13dwartls (1985: 15) multi stage random sampling in thrc: stages: ( I ) choose t5e learning class by using purposive technique,: evt-ry student have same purpse who take javelin throw subject in similar semester (2) choose the class for sarnde , i: usin2 random technique in two section for 120 s-udent5, (3) choose the sample for each research cell 1 -at using simple random sampling; it is the dnta from four women students is not used and the clata frofn 4 men students is not complete. It means the .ample is 112 in total, only for men students. Analysis techniques include descriptive analysis, re?rllation test analysis ard inferential analysis. It is rrecessary to test the hypothesis before do inferentrd analysis based on regulation te5t anal!.sis sut h as: 1) Normality test, 2) homogeneity test, 3 ) Lirlearity test, 5) wvariirte influence toward variab'e and 5 ) regression liqe test. RESEARCH RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The result of descriptive analysis of hasic ability and learn ng outcome in javelin throcv subject for every research group is appear o? Table I below:

Table 1. score recapitulation of basic ability and learninf: outcome in javelin throw subject for every research group

1 l ~pFj~-- - - 3.05 3,6 1 2.83 2,27 2,96 3.05 --

Varians 9.31 13,C: 7.99 - 5,16 8,65 9,09 Min 4.65 0 , 4.65 1 1,70 4,65 11,;3 Max 15,65 22,F's 16,50 21,20 - 16.08 22.03

Explanation : A= Learnin Pattern, /,, = reciprm~l learnin: pattern, A2 = command learning pattern, B= Willpower, B, = high willmwer. B2 = low wiliwwer, X, = t a i c ahility. -nd Y, = javelin t'lrow learning result

Normality test analyzed by using Lillefors test with the signiticance value a - 0,05 It show treated sample from population is normall! distributed. Hornoge~leity test fmm treated sample from this research is done by using F-test and Bvtlett test that show there is no variants difference %tween the tested groups. It means the data is come from homogeny population. Linearity and sovaria-e X test has influence toward free variable (Y). Meznwhile the equal regression line also she\+ that F -test by using regression line for every equalize cel' 'actors. Hypothesis test

Test resi~lt of analysis requirement is filltilling criteria to conduct covariate analysis (AKCOVA). For next step, it necessary that to conduct i~ferential analysis in orler test the research Iiypothtsis. 1 . Javelin throw subject learning result lltat using reciprocal pattern is higher rather than ca3mmand

learning pattern, after controlling basic ability.

Based on analysis above, it show that p = 0.001 < O 05, a ~ d the value of F,,,= 12,272 > F,,,,,= (0, 05/1/55) = 4, 02. It can be concluded that Ho is not accepta'lle. It means that learning rt~sult that using reciprocal pattern is highe- than command learning pat-ern after rieasuring basic i bility. It can be draw the conclusion that there I S a difference between reciproc;il and command learning pattern toward learning result after controlling basic ability of 5 tudent.

2. Learning result of student who has h i ~ h willpower is hiyher than student ~ h o ha... low mount of willpower, after controlling basic abil i~. .

Based on variant analysis of two sides of data by using GLM (General Linear Model) procedure is showing that analqsis moilel regression Uni-variant directly. Based on tahle 2, the value of F ,,,= 13,508with the value o f p = 0.001 i 0.05, can be concluded Ho is unaccep-able and the data is suitable with this research. In another word, the learning resu t ofjavelln t h r o \ ~ subject for those who high amount of \villpo\ter is higher rather than who have rt in low amount after controllirg baqic ability.

Table 2 : F test statistic ahout the influence A and B factor and interaction A*B -oward learning result of javelin throw subject after controllinr X in average.

3. There is interaction influence between student leaminq pat-ern and willpower toward learning result Jawelin throw subject, after controlling basic ability.

The similarity ANKOVA Uni-vnriant in table 2 above is using to test the inF lence of interaction factors between (Colum) learning patterns and (row) willpower loward learning outcome of Javelin throw subject after controlling basic abilit). Base on statistic F test in rable two

Variant Sources Intercept X A B A * B Error Total -

JK, 380.766 107.750 22.506 24.914 62.534 94,065

13881.425

Df 1 1 1 1 1

5 1 5 6

RJK F 7 380.766 206,4$3 , O,~'!IO 107,750 58,420 1 @,'lo0 22,506 12.202 1 0.l 1 24.9 14 13,508 @,/-I0 1 62,534 3 3,904 O,rtOO

1.844

- !--

above the value of F ,,,,= 33,904 and p = 0,001 < a = 0, 05. Those values is higher than I 'hble (005.

= 4,02. It make Ho is refwed. It means based on this result there is inflgence between interaction of learning pattern and willqower towar learning result of jadebn throw sub~.ct after controlling basic ability of students.

The effect of interaction and main influence of learning pattern forn and will pol( er after controlling basic ability is significance, in covariant analjsis atmve, therelore, the tc:st is continued by using f4NKOVA T-Test between data pairs in order to meaiure which group is tligher xtween two subjects in average.

Hypothesis test of simple effect is pi~rposed to test hypothrsis between two sample grmps. in this case, there are four simple 'iypott.c,sis (simple effeut) thlt will tested: (a) the difi-1-ence of reciprocal and command pattern loward group who have high ?mount of willpower by cor~trolling students basic ability in javelin throw sr11,ject (b) difference berween students who treated 'y using reciprocal and command after con troll in^: basic skills in jwelir throw subject, (c) the diff:rence of learning result between student who have high and low mount of vlil'power who t~%ted in reciprocal pattern after controllirg bas:c ability in javelin thr3w subject. And (d) learn'r~g result between who have high and I O N amino of will power that treated ir commard paticam after controlling basic ability in javelin throw subject. This simple effect hypo hesis test will bi backed up with SPSS program ; by using GI M Uni-Variat procedure in (1) >: B A*B to zxamine hypothesis (a) and (b); (2) X A A+B to c=\amine hypothes s (c) -ind (d).

4. Examine the difference leaming outcome of javelin throw subject behvezn jtudent who 11-eated in reciprocal is higher than comm~nd paT1.=rn for student who has high arnolmt of willpo~ver after controlling basic ability.

Based on statistic value of T-test in tabl.2 3 row [(A-l)*cB=l) = 5,652 ir value of p 0,M' < 0,05 ; therefore Ho is unacceptable. It meaw the data is suitable for research hypotiesis. It can be conclude that especially for B, (student who have high amount of willpov~er) , the ll?arnin? outcome that given reciprocal pattern trcatrnert is higher than command ones by controlling . s i c skill before.

5. Learning outcome student who treated i? reciprocal is low rafier than command for who 'lave low amount oc willpower, after controlling hs ic ability. Based on statistic viilvt: T-Test in t;l!>le 3 line [(A=2)*(B=I)] = 7,891with p va?ue 0,001 < 0, 05; Ho is refw;ed and can ht: concluded r'le data is supporting the hypothesis of reserch. I. can be concluded that especially for B2 group (stlldent who have low amount of willpower) who trrated by reciprocal F e r n , the 1i:anling oritcomc is lowest than command ones, after controlling b~cic ability.

6. Examine the difference javelin throw wbject learning outccme between student who I ave high amount of willpower rather than low ones that treated with reciprocal patteni after control ing basic ability.

Table3. Parameter estimation to test difference between Y average tctward A factor fl>r every B .C>ctor by controlring Y:

Parameter Intercept

X [B=l] [B=2] , [A=l] * [B=l]

[A=l] * [B=2] [A=2] * [B= I] [A=2] * [B=2]

B

1°.140

0.562 1.33 1

()[a) 1 1.438

0 15.924 ('(a)

T

6 7,643 2.008

5,652 -

7,891

Std. Error

0,867

0,074 0,573

2,022

2,018

- 0.1100

0.~100 1 0,301

--

Table.4. Estimation parameter to test average difference Y between every facto- B

Parameter Intercept

X [A= I] [A=2]

[A= I] * [B=2] ; [A=l] * [B=l]

[A=2] + [B=2] [A=2] * [B=l ]

Based on statistic value T-Test tonard talde four row [A=I 1*[B=2] value T = 6.961 ~ 4 t h p =- 0,001 < 0.05; it means can be concluded that es~ecially in A, (student:. who treated in reciprocal learning pattern) in javelin throw that has h gh amount willpower is higher than stutlenr who has lort amount of will pou er, after controlling basic abillr?l before.

for every level a factor by controlling X.

7. Learning outcome of student in javelin throw subject that trrlated in comrrland pattern ?nd have low amount of willpower is higher than student who has high amo~lnt of willpover after measuring basic ability.

Based on table four above, the statistic value T-test in row [(Az=2')I*[(B=2)] = 2.324 wih p value p = 0,030 < 0.05 therefon: Ho is unacceprable means the data is suitablt toward hypothesis. It means especiall} in A: (student who treated with commantl learning parern) the learning outcome is higher than studc~t who have high amwnt of wi Ipower, after cn~itrolling basic ability.

Q 10.140 0,562 - 1 -207

O(a) 3,528 O(a>

-1.332 O(a)

Analysis In this research, javelin throw leami~g outcome is t+e rer3ult that gained from stud(~~its body

motor ability that throw the javelin as far a'; possible by usinq the vies that slated by Porsatu:l*~ Atletik Seluruh Indonesia (PASI). In following explanation belcw, it explain about difference between learning pattern and willpower toward 1 ~vel in throw sullject learning outcome after cl\ntrolling student's basic ability.

The difference javelin throw learnitiq outcome between reciprocal ard command pattern after controlling basic ability show the result at first hypothesis test. It shows ttat studen: who t-eated in reciprocal pattern has high result raqher th:irl command ones. In this case can be draw the ccnclusion that in order to gain the learning purpose. reciprocal pattern is rnore effective rather than c~rnmand learning pattern.

Based on the result of ca1cul:~tion i t appear that the 3vera;e final score of student prwp who treated in reciprocal learning pattern is is "4.70 meanwhile in command pattern is 8,63. It rnlzans final score of student who treated with reciproc;~ l learning pattern is b?tter than command learnir c: pattern. Meyer in hnuhfida (2010 :12) says that the way of reciprocal learning process are : iniilrmation. instruction, stated in group in module ~~, id-and take conclusicn. The be~efits that appeqr in this learning patlern are information task. that ctlldent should to accomplish, and the student can ~ i v e a help to members of their group about the tasks Thus, every student in the learnirlg group activelc gives an advice to member of his or her grow.

The difference of learning outcome for student who high amount of wlllpowcr is h;f!her than who have low amount willpower, after cnitrolling basic ahility. Based on recearch findiny. students group who have high amount of w l l p o w ~ ~ has better final scort- rather than tie low ones. 3ased on data analysis tonard student groi~p average score for those who have low aniount of wi1lpow~:r is 9.22 and for high one is 933. It means learning7 outcome for student who have high arnolmt wi-wer is better than the low ones.

The success in javelin throw learriqg process the 1ectun.r not only counts on stuc't nt motor movement. There is another aspect that Iwturer should pay attention to i:: student will, 111 another word as acknowledged as willpower. Wit'lout willpower, studeni will not ai:h;i:ve the rnaxirr al result.

73

Std. Error 0,867 0,074 0,54 1

0,550

0,573

T 1 1,696 7,643 2,230

6.96 1

2,342

REFERENCES

Anarino, Anthony A. Cuniculum 'rheorq and Design in 1'hysic:al Education. St Loius: Tie CV. Mosby Company, 1980.

Bompa, Tudor 0. Theory and Methodolop of 'Training: The Key to Atletic l'erformance. Nev. York: Depertment of Psysical Education New York University, 1908.

Bloom, Benjamin S., Max D. Engelhart, \h1:llker H. Hill. Edward .'. Frust, dar~ David R. Kratbvohl. Taxonomy of Educational Obyecti! e. Handbook 1 : Cognitive Domain. New York: Lngrnan Inc. 198 1 .

Briggs, Leslie J. (ed). Intructional Design Principles and A ,\pplil:ations. New Jersey: Prentic-.-Hall, Inc. 1979.

Byra. Mark. Resiprocal Style of Teaching. A Positive M~tivational Climate 7,006 http:// www.questia.com/ googleScholar. zlst? docld=500258262 3, (diakses 05 Febn~ari 20 1 1 )).

Djamarah, Syaifill Bahri dan Aswan Zain. Strategi Belajar Mengi~jar. Jakartii: Rineka Cipta. Z002.

Edwards, Allen L. Experimental Design in Psychological Resear-ch. New J'ork : Harper am1 Ro~v, Inc. 1985.

HusdartqH. J. S. Psikologi Olahraga. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2010.

Kiram, Y anuar. Belajar Motorih. Jakat-ra: Proyek Peningkatan Tenaga Icependidikan Di rektorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tingg; Deper-emen Pendidikan dan Kebudayxtn, 1992.

Lutan, Rusli. Belajar Keterampilan Motorik, Pengantar Teori dan Metode. Jakarta: Direktnrat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Deperernen Pendidikarl dan Kebudayann, 1 988.

Mosston, Muska dan Sara Ashworth. Tesching Physical E:duca-ion. New Yo-k: Mcmillan College Publishing Company. 1994.

Muhfida. Model Pembelajaran-Free Ebooh (Bse) SD, SMP,SMA.SMK http:// sumetris.co. cc. 2010.

Purwanto, M Ngalim. Psikologi Pendidikan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakilryil, 20 1 0.

Shaffat, Idri. Optimized Learning Strategv. Pendekatan Teoritis can Praktis Meraih Ketrerha5ilan Belajar. Jakarta: Prestasi P~lstaka. 2009.

Slavin, Robert A. Educational Psycholog:. New York: A114 n & I'lacon, 1994.

Stoltz, Paul G. Adversity Quotient,. terjemahan T. Hermaya. Jakarta: Grasi~do. 2005.

Soedijarto, Pendidikan Nasional Sebagai Wahana Mencerdnskan Kehidupar~ Rangsa clan Membangun Perabadan Nzgara-sangsa. Jakarta: Cinaps. 2000.

Uno. Hamzah B. Model Pembelaj;wan Mcnciptakan Proses Belaiar Mengajar Yang Kreakti' dan Efektif. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 211'17.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nornor 20 Tahun 2003 tent~ng Sistem Pendidikcin Nasi mal.