flood damage emergency reconstruction project –...

Ministry of Water Resourcesand Meteorology (MOWRAM)

Asian Development Bank Cambodia

Flood Damage Emergency Reconstruction Project– Output 3: Irrigation and Flood ControlADB Loan Number : 2852-CAM(SF)

AusAID Grant Number: 0285-CAM(EF)

MONTHLY REPORTVersion 1

DECEMBER 2012

31 December 2012

In association with

KEY CONSULTANTS (CAMBODIA)

Egis Eau Document quality information

Flood Damage Emergency Reconstruction Project – Output 3: Irrigation and Flood ControlVersion 1

Document quality information

General information

Author(s) Mark Schiele, Egis Eau Team Leader; Khoun Sambo, Deputy TL (KCC)

Project name Flood Damage Emergency Reconstruction Project – Output 3: Irrigationand Flood Control

Document name MONTHLY REPORT

Date 9th

January 2013

Reference FDERP- MR5- 1212

Addressee(s)

Sent to:

Name Organisation Sent on (date):

H.E. Ponh Sachak Project Director, PIU 9 Jan 2013

Copy to:

Name Organisation Sent on (date):

2 PIU

2 PCMU

3 ADB

History of modifications

Version Date Written by Approved & signed by:

Egis Eau Contents


Contents

Chapter 1 - Summary................................................................................... 9

1. Introduction .......................................................................................... 92. Key Activities and Issues this month.................................................10

2.1. Consultants Mobilisation .............................................................................. 10

2.2. Schedule for preparation of sub-projects ..................................................... 10

2.3. Principal constraints ..................................................................................... 10

2.4. Reporting...................................................................................................... 10

Chapter 2 - Consultants Activities............................................................ 12

1. Mobilisation .........................................................................................121.1. Addendum.................................................................................................... 13

2. Field visits............................................................................................133. People met ...........................................................................................144. Stage 2 activities .................................................................................14

4.1. Supervision of Construction of civil works.................................................... 14

5. Stage 3 activities .................................................................................145.1. Design Implementation ................................................................................ 14

5.2. Stage 3 Procurement ................................................................................... 15

6. Assistance with Project Management................................................166.1. Procurement of Civil Works ......................................................................... 16

6.2. Procurement of equipment........................................................................... 16

6.3. Progress Monitoring ..................................................................................... 16

Chapter 3 - Implementation Status........................................................... 17

1. Overall Schedule and Physical Progress ..........................................171.1. Progress Monitoring ..................................................................................... 17

2. Stage 2 Progress .................................................................................182.1. CW1 ............................................................................................................. 18

2.2. CW2 ............................................................................................................. 18

2.3. CW9 ............................................................................................................. 19

2.4. CW10/11 ...................................................................................................... 19

2.5. CW12 ........................................................................................................... 19

2.6. Contractors’ Reports/ Quality Control .......................................................... 20

2.7. Construction Progress Photos (Stage 2) ..................................................... 20

3. Stage 3 Progress .................................................................................223.1. Topographic Surveys ................................................................................... 22

3.2. Sub-project Profiles...................................................................................... 22

3.3. Engineering Design...................................................................................... 23

3.4. Socio-economics.......................................................................................... 23

3.5. FWUC .......................................................................................................... 23

4. Safeguards...........................................................................................234.1. Gender reporting _ unskilled labour............................................................. 23

4.2. Resettlement ................................................................................................ 24

4.3. Environment ................................................................................................. 25

5. Constraints and issues .......................................................................255.1. Access.......................................................................................................... 25

5.2. Variation Order proposal_ FDERP-CW1 ..................................................... 25

Chapter 4 - Project Management Issues .................................................. 26

Egis Eau Contents


1. Procurement ........................................................................................261.1. Procurement of Civil Works ......................................................................... 26

1.2. Procurement of equipment........................................................................... 27

1.3. Vehicle Procurement.................................................................................... 27

1.4. NWISP Procurement.................................................................................... 28

2. Financial Progress ..............................................................................283. Consultants Services ..........................................................................28

3.1. Billing............................................................................................................ 28

3.2. Payment Issues............................................................................................ 29

3.3. Resources .................................................................................................... 29

4. ADB Review Mission...........................................................................29

Egis Eau List of appendices


List of appendices

Appendix 1 Subprojects location map..................................................................... 30

Appendix 2 Overall Sub-projects Implementation Schedule - December 2012........ 31

Appendix 3 Procurement Implementation Dates for Civil Works ............................. 33

Appendix 4 Procurement Implementation Dates for Goods..................................... 34

Appendix 5 Consulting Services Implementation Schedule..................................... 35

Appendix 6 Summary of TA consultant experts’ mobilization .................................. 36

Appendix 7 Reports submitted to date .................................................................... 37

Appendix 8 People Met........................................................................................... 40

Appendix 9 Summary of ADB Loan Costs .............................................................. 42

Appendix 10 Progress Summary for Output 3 Activities from DMF ........................... 43

Appendix 11 Stage 3 subprojects ............................................................................. 44

Appendix 12 Bid Advertising – CW5 ......................................................................... 45

Appendix 13 LGAP Monitoring Table ........................................................................ 49

Egis Eau List of tables


List of tables

Table 1 Mobilisation Dates of TA team members.............................................. 12

Table 2 Field visits _ Month – December .......................................................... 13

Table 3 Use of unskilled labour _ No. of females .............................................. 24

Table 4 Payments Table 5 Advance payments Stage 2 Contracts.................... 26

Table 6 Procurement Package Summary ......................................................... 27

List of figures

Figure 1 Output 3-Irrigation and flood control - Physical Progress...................... 17

Figure 2 Physical Progress overall for Stage 2 (construction) ............................ 18

Egis Eau Acronyms and Abbreviations


Acronyms and Abbreviations

ADB Asian Development Bank

AusAID Australian Agency for International Development

CARM Cambodian Resident Mission (of ADB)

DMF Design and Monitoring Framework

EA Executing Agency

FGIA First Generation Imprest Account

FWUC Farmer Water User Community

IA Implementing Agency

IEE Initial Environmental Examination

MEF Ministry of Economy and Finance

MLMUPC Ministry of Land Mapping Urban Planning and Construction

MOU Memorandum of Understanding

MOWRAM Ministry of Water Resources and Meteorology

MPWT Ministry of Public Works and Transport

MRD Ministry of Rural Development

NWISP Northwest Irrigation Sector Project

PAM Project Administration Manual

PCMU Project Coordination and Monitoring Unit (MEF)

PDLMUPC Provincial DepT. of Land Mapping Urban Planning and Construction

PDWRAM Provincial Department of Water Resources and Meteorology

PIMD Participatory Irrigation Management and Development

PIU Project Implementation Unit

RGC Royal Government of Cambodia

ROW Right-of-way

RRP Report and Recommendation of the President (to the board of directors)

SAH Severely Affected Households

SGIA Second Generation Impress Account

TA Technical Assistance

TOR Terms of Reference

Egis Eau MONTHLY REPORT


Chapter 1 - Summary

1. Introduction

The Flood Damage Emergency Reconstruction Project consists of five project outputs,

as defined in the ADBs RRP of which three comprise physical implementation:

Output 1: National and Provincial Roads_ implemented by MPWT

Output 2: Rural Roads_ implemented by MRD

Output 3: Irrigation and Flood Control_ implemented by MOWRAM

Furthermore the emergency repairs were categorised into 3 phases, Stage 1 to 3 as:

Stage 1- Immediate repairs to re-establish use of the infrastructure on a temporary

basis and restore communications.

Stage 2- Fast track repairs where it was considered necessary to fully repair the

damage before the next wet season (WS) to secure the existing (undamaged) works

Stage 3- Remaining flood damage restoration to complete the remaining damage

repairs, preferably within the following two dry season construction periods.

This report covers progress on the activities of the Consultant and of the MOWRAM

component of the Flood Damage Emergency Reconstruction Project for the period 1 to

31 December 2012.

The FDERP Project started 14th May 2012 when the ADB Loan No 2852-CAM (SF)

became effective, and according to the original implementation schedule, it is due to be

completed by September 2014, and the loan closing date is March 2015.

The contract agreement for services between the Consultant and MOWRAM was

signed on 21st June 2012. However, two TA team members had been mobilised since

5th March to provide urgent services to support the Stage 2 contract preparation, to be

retroactively financed as per the MOU (ADB/RGC 26th January-10th February 2012).

The Terms of Reference (TOR) included in the ADBs MOU state that the consultant

services are required to assist MOWRAM in the selection, design, procurement and

management of civil works contracts, construction supervision, reporting, performance

monitoring, financial management, safeguards compliance, and implementation of

subprojects. Consultancy services are required over about 3 years and estimated to

include 32 and 181 person-months of international and local consultants respectively. It

is envisaged that the scope of the work will incorporate about 15-20 subprojects in up

to 5 provinces; Prey Veng, Kampong Cham, Kampong Thom, Siem Reap, and

Battambang. The consultants will report to the head of the PIU of FDERP within

MOWRAM, the IA for Output 3.

This report presents the key issues and current progress status as explained below,

and complies with service agreement obligation for the Consultant to submit monthly

progress reports.



2. Key Activities and Issues this month

2.1. Consultants Mobilisation

The Consultant mobilised key staff soon after signing of the agreement and further

mobilisation of International and National experts took place through the quarter Q3.

Table 1 provides the mobilisation dates of team members and Appendix 6 tables the

Consultants mobilisation to date. The Consulting Services Implementation Schedule of

the agreement is here included in Appendix 5 and has been adjusted to update to the

actual start of the services.

Two international experts and fifteen national experts were mobilized during reporting

period, one supervision inspector and ten field data survey staff.

2.2. Schedule for preparation of sub-projects

2.2.1. Stage 2 works construction

By the end of June 2012 contracts for construction of civil works to a value of USD 4.25

milllion were signed for 5 packages comprising 10 sub-projects identified in the ADB’s

PP. Contractors mobilised immediately and initially they progressed well despite the

wet season conditions, however later as the seasonal rains worsened the work was

halted. With the end of the wet season work recommenced and completion progress is

described further in Chapter 3.

2.2.2. Stage 3 implementation

Work continued following the schedule presented in the ‘Inception Planning’ report of

26th June 2012 in collecting data and defining sub-projects for detailed design. This

includes preparation of sub-project profile reports.

The overall Stage 3 sub-projects implementation schedule is presented here in

Appendix 2. The sub-project locations are shown on the map included in Appendix 1.

2.3. Principal constraints

The poor condition of access road still affected civil works at Lam Laong sub-project in

Prey Veng Province. The flood season waters had not receded sufficiently and work

progress was hampered by the high water levels in the main canals at some projects

sites particularly Toul Skear in Prev Veng and Hun Sen Baray in Kampong Thom

Provinces.

2.4. Reporting

Reporting requirements of the Consultant are included in Appendix B of the Contract

for Consultant’s Services (21st June 2012) and are as follows:

Inception Report (Month 2)



Monthly Progress Reports

Quarterly Reports

Project Completion Report

A draft of the Inception Report was submitted on the 30th August 2012, a final version

01 on 10th September and a final version 02 with further revisions on the 26th

September.

Reports produced and submitted to date by the Consultant are listed in Appendix 7.

After discussion on 3rd October with PCMU, and with approval from MOWRAM it was

agreed that the Consultant should submit a monthly report in lieu of the quarterly

report. The IA is also requested to submit quarterly safeguard reports.



Chapter 2 - Consultants Activities

1. Mobilisation

The Consultant mobilised key staff soon after signing of the agreement and further

mobilisation of International and National experts took place this month. Table 1

provides the mobilisation dates of team members and Appendix 6 tables the

Consultants mobilisation to date. The Consulting Services Implementation Schedule of

the agreement is here included in Appendix 5 and has been adjusted to update to the

actual start of the services.

Table 1 Mobilisation Dates of TA team members

No. Name Position Mobilisation Date

INTERNATIONAL

1 Mark SCHIELE Team Leader/Irrigation Engineer 5th

March 2012*

2 June MENDOZA Senior Procurement Specialist 15th

August 2012

3 Francisco REGONAS Design Engineer 2nd

July 2012

4 Badre LANEDRI CD/FWUC Specialist 30th

July 2012

5 Miguel GUIOGUIO Socio-economist 28th

August 2012

NATIONAL

1 Sambo KHOUN Deputy Team Leader/ Irrigation Design Engineer 6th

March 2012*

2 Phanna CHROEUNG Contract Engineer-Assistant RE #1 25th

June 2012

3 Sovann KHEANG Contract Engineer-Assistant RE #2 2nd

July 2012

4 Savy PRAK Contract Engineer-Assistant RE #3 25th

June 2012

5 Sophanna MEL Resettlement Specialist 6th

August 2012

6 Chantha OUK Socio-agric. Economist 23th

July 2012

7 Pich GNOUN Structural Engineer 11th

July 2012

8 Bonvongsa TOCH Hydrologist 2nd

July 2012

9 Sophal TITH Surveyor 17th

July 2012

10 Kosal SIN Procurement Specialist 3rd

September 2012

11 Mavuth IM FWUC Specialist 23th

July 2012

12 Virethvak TAK O&M Specialist 20th

August 2012

13 Motha HEM GIS/Autocad/Mapping Specialist 2nd

July 2012

14 Pra Pey KOL Labour and Gender Specialist 6th

August 2012

24th

December 2012

15 You Cheang SOUR Environmental Specialist 1st

August 2012

16 6 No. Assistant Surveyors 27th

June 2012



No. Name Position Mobilisation Date

17 1 No. Inspector 25th

September 2012

18 10 No. Field data survey staff 24th

September 2012

* pre-agreement mobilisation for Urgent Services

1.1. Addendum

The Consultant proposed an addendum to the Consulting Services Contract on 17th

October 2012 following up on recommendations to some reallocations of national

inputs included in the Inception Report. This first addendum was intended to rationalize

services for the immediate following phase of the project. The suggested changes were

cost neutral. The request was not processed by PIU and the Addendum was revised

and resubmitted on 27th December. The revised addendum also requested the use of

contingencies for per diem for National Staff. As of December 74% of the budget for

per diem has been expended.

2. Field visits

Table 2 below shows the sub-projects and facilities visited during this reporting period

by team members.

Table 2 Field visits _ Month – December

Date Sub-project Province Facilities visited Remarks

5-7/12/12 Kor Aet, PorTatres and PhdavChum

Kampong Cham PIMD training and O&M Stage 3

12/12/12 Lam Laong andToul Skear

Prey Veng Identify therehabilitation civil worksfor stage 3

Stage 3

12-14/12/12 Krapeu main canaland Phdav Chum

Siem Reap andKampong Cham

Agricultural profilesurvey

Stage 3

18-20/12/12 Lam Laong andToul Skear

Prey Veng Agricultural profilesurvey, establishment/activation of the CSCand review existingarrangement of O&M

Stage 3

19/12/12 Kor Aet Kampong Cham Contract sign on landcontribution, reviewingon environmental issueand introduce toCommunity of finalengineer design

Stage 3

25/12/12 Kor Aet Kampong Cham Contract sign on landcontribution, reviewingon environmental issueand introduce toCommunity of finalengineer design

Stage 3

26/12/12 Ork Ambok andToul Skear

Prey Veng Sport Check the qualityof civil work and

Stage 2



Date Sub-project Province Facilities visited Remarks

progress

27-28/12/12 Kamping Puoy,Boeung Kansengand Kong Piseth

Battambang Sport Check the qualityof civil work andprogress

Stage 2

27-28/12/12 O Thnot Kampong Thom Meeting with CSC andfarmer on draft designlayout

Stage 3

31/12/12 Hun Sen Baray Kampong Thom Sport Check the qualityof civil work andprogress

Stage 2

3. People met

The Consultant is most grateful for the assistance provided by MOWRAM and

PDWRAM personnel during the report period. People met during the reporting period

discussions and meeting were held are listed in Appendix 8.

4. Stage 2 activities

4.1. Supervision of Construction of civil works

The Consultant assisted MOWRAM with the supervision of the contracts for the 5

packages comprising 10 sub-projects located in provinces of Kampong Cham,

Kampong Thom, Prey Veng and Battambang. The supervision inspector mobilised in

September continued to provide day to day supervision presence at the Kamping Pouy

head regulator structure in Battambang province, keeping in constant touch with the

Consultants supervisory engineer. Periodic reports resulting from supervision visits are

included in Appendix 7.

5. Stage 3 activities

The Consultant continued with field work in order to complete this work to confirm sub-

project selection, and to formulate interventions, integrate beneficiary requirements,

identify design requirements and take into consideration specific constraints etc. All

provinces were visited by the TA team members. Appendix 11 lists the Stage 3 sub-

projects.

5.1. Design Implementation

The Consultant prepared work schedule for design implementation and continued

collating data for preparation of sub-project profile of the priority selected Stage 3 sub-

project in Siem Riep province, namely the Krapeu Main Canal.



This subproject profile for Krapeu Main Canal was submitted in December to PIU for

onward transmittal to PCMU and ADB. Design of this sub-project was simultaneously

completed in December following revision after receiving comments from PIU

Design work was completed on sub-projects: O Thnot, Prek Touch & Prek Thom, O

Ansar in Kampong Thom province, and the last of the sub-project profiles (Boeung

Kvek) was submitted for approval.

Design work continued on sub-projects: Toul Skear and Lam Laong sub-projects in

Prey veng province, in parallel with formulation of the corresponding sub-project

profiles.

5.2. Stage 3 Procurement

Procurement for Stage 3 works is programmed to commence in the last quarter of

2012, but is dependent on endorsement by MEF and no objection from ADB. Draft

NCBs for two packages were submitted to PIU and subsequently to PCMU for review

and endorsement. These required Prior Review.

The two procurement packages CW4 and CW5 that include the 3 sub-projects in

Kampong Cham were adjusted following reviews and received endorsement from

PCMU and ADB: CW4 contains only Phdav Chum sub-project, while CW5 includes

both Por Tatres and Kor Aet sub-projects. These were submitted by PIU to PCMU on

22 October 2012.

The CW5 (Kor Aet and Por Tatres sub-projects) procurement package received official

ADB no-objection on 16th November and the invitation for bids was placed on 23rd

November, however owing to a complaint by a prospective bidder regarding availability

of documentation the bid advertising was repeated on the 19th December. Thus, bid

opening was extended to 17th January 2013.

The CW4 (Phdav Chum sub-project) package received official ADB no objection on

17th December (letter dated 14th Dec to MEF) and the invitation for bids was placed on

21st December, and bid opening is set for 21st January 2013.

Both procurements call for pre-bid meetings followed by site visits programmed as

follows:

For CW5 _ 3rd January 2013 pre bid meeting

For CW4 _ 8th January 2013 pre bid meeting

The package for 4 Kampong Thom sub-projects FDERP-CW13 is prepared in draft and

once finalised will require PRC endorsement but not ADB prior approval.



6. Assistance with Project Management

6.1. Procurement of Civil Works

Procurement of the civil works has followed the design and preparation of bid

documents for the selected sub-projects following the ADB requirements laid out in the

project documents in particular the project Procurement Plan (PP), which was

presented in the PAM as Appendix 5. The Consultant provided specific assistance to

PIU in preparation of the procurement documents and bid evaluation for Stage 2 sub-

projects in June. Draft bid documents for NCB for Stage 3 sub-projects have been

prepared as well as template for bid evaluation and reporting.

The National Procurement Specialist assisted the PIU in processing the Bidding

Invitations mentioned above, including the bid advertising, for 2 packages contract No.

FDERP-MOWRAM-CW4 and FDERP-MOWRAM-CW5 (see Appendix 12)

Procurement tracking is reported in the table included here as Appendix 3, which

shows actual dates for the procurement process for the Stage 2 civil works and the

scheduled procurement planning for Stage 3 civil works. The schedule was adjusted at

the beginning of October following request and recommendations made by PCMU to

use ADB standard process times in calendar days for the different stages of the

procurement process. This considerably lengthens the programmed or target award

dates. However, it is hoped that some of these process times may be shortened.

6.2. Procurement of equipment

The procurement of goods (Contracts EQ1 and 2) was concluded at the end of

September with the delivery of 6 computers, 1 printer and the telephone/fax to FDERP

TA offices. This was followed in November with delivery of one more computer and one

photocopier.

One computer is still pending delivery to the Consultants office as per the agreement.

The procurement planning for equipment is included in the Appendix 4 ‘Procurement

Implementation dates for Goods’.

6.3. Progress Monitoring

The Consultant has prepared a physical progress monitoring system for the Output 3

component that will be included in the monthly reports as an S-curve showing ‘actual’

and ‘target’ values and are presented in Chapter 3.

The figure in Appendix 10 provides an updated progress summary for Output 3 –

Irrigation and Flood Control activities from the project DMF (Design and Monitoring

Framework_ appendix 9 of the PAM).



Chapter 3 - Implementation Status

1. Overall Schedule and Physical Progress

1.1. Progress Monitoring

The Consultant has prepared a physical progress monitoring system for the Output 3

component that is included in the monthly reports as an S-curve showing ‘actual’ and

‘target’ values as presented here in Figure 1.

The summary schedule for implementation of FDERP Output 3 – Irrigation and Flood

Control is shown in Figure 1, which also provides an estimate of the physical progress

of each of the main components. The estimate of physical progress has been done by

making reasonable estimates of the weighting for each activity /component as a

percentage of the total project. Thus, the estimated physical completion of the

Project to December 2012 is 32.3% compared with the target of 36.1% for 30

December as per the schedule established this quarter. The physical progress for the

five FDERP project components is presented below in Figure 1 in graphical form, and

presents the actual versus scheduled progress.

The overall implementation schedule for the ten sub-projects undergoing selection

screening and design is included in Appendix 2.

Figure 1 Output 3-Irrigation and flood control - Physical Progress

Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

A-J J-S O-D J-M A-J J-S O-D J-M A-J J-S O-D J-M A-J J-S O-D

Cumulative Quarterly Schedule 100.0 0.18 18.20 36.10 52.20 65.70 70.40 74.80 87.30 91.40 95.60 98.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

Cumulative Quarterly Actual 0.18 16.20 32.30

15.96

21.13

7.04

38.50

17.37

YEAR 2015YEAR 2012 YEAR 2013 YEAR 2014

TASK / ACTIVITY % WT

Consultant Services

Design/Preparation

Safeguards60

%

80

100

Procurement

Construction

0

20

40

Schedule

Actual



2. Stage 2 Progress

The civil works progress of 10 selected Stage 2 sub-projects is estimated to be at an

average overall completion of 66%, which is behind target of 100% (see Figure 2

below). Delays continued this month due to the poor condition of access roads and the

high water levels in canals on some sites which had significant impact on construction

progress. Progress by contract is discussed further below.

Figure 2 Physical Progress overall for Stage 2 (construction)

2.1. CW1

The CW1 package was split into two sub-projects namely; Lam Laong and Toul Skear.

Lam Laong. The selected Contractor was mobilized for the construction of the

works in early July. The overall physical progress of works is estimated to be

42% which is behind target of 100%, Progress was halted by very poor

condition of access road to the project site.

Toul Skear. The Toul Skear sub-project construction commenced in early July,

with the earthwork on the main canal, one bridge, three main canal crossing box

culverts and ten pipes drain outlet. Overall physical progress of works is

estimated to be 58% which is behind target of 100%. Delays in construction

progress have occurred due to high water level in the Sne Reservoir which

impacts the canal system as there is no head regulator.

2.2. CW2

The CW2 package was split into two sub-projects namely; Boeung Kamplienh and Ork

Ambok:



Boeung Kamplienh. This sub-project consist of minor structures and earthwork

and has achieved 95% overall completion ahead of target 100%. The works

were partially inspected by the Inspection Committee on the 3rd September

2012, however as there were construction flaws and unfinished items, the final

inspection for completion has been deferred to a later date

Ork Ambok. The Ork Ambok sub-project was commenced construction in early

July, with the earthwork on the main canal, one head regulator, three bridges

and 10 pipe drain outlet and is now at about 80% completion, which is behind

target 100% for this period.

2.3. CW9

The CW9 package was split into two sub-projects namely; Boeung Kak and Srok dam

Boeung Kak. By the end of October 2012 the overall progress is at 100%

completion. The inspection committee comprising PIU, PDWRAM and TA

carried out the partially inspection of the works in the presence of the Contractor

on 3rd September 2012. However as there were construction flaws and

unfinished items such as construction of benchmarks, the final inspection was

deferred.

Srok Dam. By the end of October 2012 the overall progress is 100% completion.

The inspection committee comprising PIU, PDWRAM and TA carried out the

partially inspection of the works in the presence of the Contractor on 3rd

September 2012, however as there were construction flaws and unfinished

items such as construction of benchmarks and planting of trees, the final

inspection has been deferred.

2.4. CW10/11

The CW10/11 was split into three sub-projects namely; Boeung Kanseng, Kong Piseth

and Kamping Puoy; work commenced in early July:

Boeung Kanseng. The selected Contractor was mobilized for the construction of

work in early July; the sub-project consists of minor structures and earthwork.

The overall physical progress of the works is estimated to be 69%, which is

behind the target 100% for this reporting period.

Kong Piseth. The sub-project consists of minor structures and earthwork. The

overall physical progress of works is estimated to be 74% completion versus a

target of 100%

Kamping Puoy. The sub-project consists of head regulator and one main canal

1,000 m long. The overall physical progress of the works is estimated to be 35%

against a target 100%

2.5. CW12

The CW12 has only one sub-project namely, Hunsen Baray



Hunsen Baray sub-project commenced works in early July, with the earthwork

on the canal embankment, 1 intake box culvert structure, 2 main canal check

crossing structures and 8 drain outlet structures. The overall physical progress

of civil works is estimated to be 60% completion versus a target of 100%.

delays in construction progress have occurred due to the farmer water

requirements for the early dry season rice, so the Contractor was unable to

build the detour road to permit construction of the structures

2.6. Contractors’ Reports/ Quality Control

Soil and concrete testing reports have been received from the following Contractors:

Ung Sim Sia Construction Co., Ltd submitted Construction Material’s Test Result for Ork

Ambok and Boeung Kamplienh sub-projects on 7th

August 2012

Meas Sovuthidy Construction Co., Ltd submitted Construction Material’s Test Result for

Toul Skear and Lam Loang sub-projects on 17th

August 2012

Punloeu Banteay Srey Construction Co., Ltd submitted Field Density Tests for Boeung Kak

and Srok Dam on 9th

September 2012

Soeun Soknan Construction Co., Ltd submitted Construction Material’s Test Result for Hun

Sen Baray sub-project on 17th

September 2012

Soeun Soknan Construction Co., Ltd submitted Field Density Tests for Hun Sen Baray

sub-project on 20th

September 2012

Meas Sovuthidy Construction Co., Ltd submitted Field Density Tests for Lam Laong and

Toul Skear sub-projects on 23 October 2012

Royal Mekong Construction & Development Pte., Ltd submitted Field Density Tests for

Kamping Puoy, Boeung Kanseng and Kong Piseth sub-projects on 5 December 2012

Ung Sim Sia Construction Co., Ltd submitted test results for laterite material for Ork Ambok

sub-project on 14th

December 2012

2.7. Construction Progress Photos (Stage 2)

Toul Skear Main Canal Lam Laong Reservoir Embankment



Ork Ambok Main Canal Boeung kamplienh Canal

Srok Dam Boeung Kak Flood Embankment

Kamping Puoy Head Regulator Boeung Kanseng Flood Embankment



Kong Piseth Canal Hun Sen Baray Check Crossing Structure

3. Stage 3 Progress

3.1. Topographic Surveys

Data processing was completed in October for the topographic surveys on the selected

Stage 3 sub-projects identified at inception and carried out in the 10 subprojects in all

four provinces. This completed the programmed topographic field topographic survey

work. The data has been used in preparation of sub-project profiles and the design

drawings, and the survey data has been compiled for submission to the Client.

The Client has requested that the TA also prepare additional designs for Toul Skear

sub-project (see Stage 2) that will include main canals and secondary canals within the

overall system. The remaining balance for the topographic surveyors will be used for

the topographic survey of the existing canals identified by PDWRAM and PIU.

3.2. Sub-project Profiles

TA team members continued with visits to the selected Stage 3 sub-projects to identify

and collect essential data and information for preparation of sub-project profiles and

design work.

The Consultant prepared work schedule for design implementation and completed

preparation of sub-project profiles of the priority selected Stage 3 sub-projects in

Kampong Thom and Siem Reap Provinces. Boeung Kvek sub-project profile including

safeguard screening was submitted to PIU on 6th December 2012, Krapeu Main Canal

sub-project profile (Vers 02) was submitted to PIU on 31st December 2012.

Endorsement from PCMU and no objection from ADB for five sub-project profiles

previously submitted, namely: O Thnot, Prek Touch and Prek Thom, O Ansar, Boeung

Kvek and Krapeu Main Canal are pending.



3.3. Engineering Design

Designs have been prepared for: the four Kampong Cham sub-projects included in

CW13; the Krapeu Main Canal sub-project in Siem Riep; the Lam Laong Spillway (to

complete the Stage 2 works on that sub-project in Prey Veng.

3.4. Socio-economics

The baseline data survey was completed this quarter. The sample included 522

respondents and the survey will have a margin of error of ±5%. The survey covered

four provinces where the sub-projects will be implemented, encompassing 7 districts,

24 communes and 87 villages as shown in the September Monthly Report. Data

processing (data entry to excel database) was completed this month.

3.5. FWUC

The FWUC specialist together with Socio Agriculture Economist and other team

members made visits to selected Stage 3 sub-projects to ensure beneficiary

participation in the repair design, and assist in the activation or creation where non-

existent of Construction Sub-Committees (CSC) of the FWUCs or the FWUGs, as well

as to collect socio-agricultural /economic data for preparation of sub-project profiles. A

plan for the FWUC related work including FWUC strengthening activities that was

prepared on inception is being followed.

Project orientation concentrated on Lam Laong and Toul Skear sub-projects this month

while training on roles and responsibilities of construction sub-committees (CSCs)

centred on the Kampong Cham and Kampong Thom province sub-projects. PIU staff

assisted in these meetings. The FWUC specialist facilitated meetings between the

subcommittees, the community and for the CSC, and the design team to go through

the reconstruction design proposals.

The FWUC specialist also has been closely involved with resettlement and design

activities working in liaison to ensure that the beneficiaries are actively involved in

these processes.

4. Safeguards

A separate safeguard quarterly report has been prepared for Q4 2012.

4.1. Gender reporting _ unskilled labour

The nominated Labour and Gender Specialist was mobilized for one month last

quarter for activating and monitoring the Labor and Gender Action Plan (LGAP) that will

ensure the participation of women in the project management and implementation. The

specialist was remobilised at the end of the quarter for monitoring and review. The ADB

Policy on Gender requires at least 30% of unskilled labour hired will be women. The

Table 3 updated for December shows that, the average number of female unskilled



labour at the project construction sites (Stage 2) is 23%, lower than the value on Stage

2 construction start up (40%). However, it should be noted that due to the wet season

flooding the Stage 2 construction works slowed down and even halted for some time

and naturally less labour was employed or ceased to be used.

The Contractors’ reported use of unskilled labour for December is as follows:

Table 3 Use of unskilled labour _ No. of females

Number of unskilled labourContract Sub-project

Total Female %

CW1 Toul Skear 43 19 44

Lam Laong 0 0 0

CW2 Ork Ambok 9 0 0

Boeung Kamplienh 40 4 11

CW9 Srok Dam 0 0 0

Boeung Kak 0 0 0

CW10/11 Kamping Pouy 21 0 0

Boeung Kanseng/KP 26 9 53

CW12 Hunsen Baray 12 2 20

Total 151 34 23

The LGAP progress report monitoring table for the month of December is included in

Appendix 13.

4.2. Resettlement

The Resettlement specialist made several visits to subproject of Krapeu Main Canal

which located at Chi Kreng district in Siem Ream province and prepared documents

and tools for fieldwork at Krapeu main canal sub-project for conducting public meeting

with beneficiaries and possible affected households (AHs) at Kork Thlok Leu and Kork

Thlork Krom commune. The resettlement specialist with the assistance of Agricultural

Specialist and accompanied by engineering team had meetings with beneficiaries and

AHs of the above two communes to prepare agreement with finger print on the

voluntary certificate of land contribution.

The involuntary resettlement impact checklist, categorization report was prepared for

inclusion of the Krapeu Main Canal sub-project profile that was submitted this month.

Documents were reviewed and the draft safeguards quarterly report due at the end of

December was prepared.

The Resettlement specialist accompanied by the Design Engineer made visits to Kor

Aet subproject located in Me Pring commune, Batheay district, Kampong Cham

province and prepared documents and tools for fieldwork at Kor Aet sub-project for



conducting public meetings with beneficiaries at Me Pring commune. Finally, a meeting

was held on 19 December at Me Pring Pagoda with the beneficiaries of this commune.

4.3. Environment

The project has designated all Stage 3 sub-projects to be Category B irrespective of

actual situation and therefore Environmental Management Plans (EMP) and Initial

Environmental Examinations (IEEs) are required. The EMPs are included in the draft

NCB documents under Section V (Specifications and Performance Requirements). The

IEE report was submitted to PCMU and MEF on 26th November 2012.

The environmental screening is used as basis for environment categorization and so

far has confirmed that the subproject interventions have minimal or no adverse

environmental impacts. The environmental check lists for the sub-project profiles Lam

Laong and Toul Skear subprojects in Prey Veng Province were prepared last month to

cover the additional works to these schemes that were not included in Stage 2. The

environmental screening check lists for the subprojects in Kampong Thom Province

were attached with the subproject profiles that were submitted for approval this month.

5. Constraints and issues

5.1. Access

The poor condition of access roads and high water levels in canals in some areas

impeded the civil works of Stage 2 construction works as described above.

5.2. Variation Order proposal_ FDERP-CW1

The Lam Loang spillway has been designed under Stage 3 to complete the works on

Lam Laong sub-project under construction in Stage 2 (FDERP-CW1). It has been

proposed that the spillway should be added to the Stage 2 Contract as a Variation

Order rather than including it in the CW3 package of Stage 3. This would require MEF

endorsement and ADB no-objection as the increase in the original contract amount

would be more than 15% of the original price. The design for the spillway is being

reviewed and the engineers estimate to be revised accordingly.



Chapter 4 - Project Management Issues

1. Procurement

1.1. Procurement of Civil Works

The schedule for the procurement for Stage 3 works has been revised. The target or

planned dates have been revised using standard ADB target times for task/activities in

the procurement process as requested by PCMU.

1.1.1. Payments

The following contractors payments have been processed and paid:

Table 4 Payments Table 5 Advance payments Stage 2 Contracts

AmountContract Sub-project Contractor Date Payment

USD

Toul Skear 11/7/12 Advance $171,128.91CW1

Lam Laong

Meas SovuthidyConstruction Co., Ltd 23/10/12 IPC1 $431,017.16

Ork AmbokCW2

Boeung Kamplienh

Ung Sim SiaConstruction Co., Ltd

16/7/12

Srok DamCW9

Boeung Kak

Punloeu Banteay SreyConstruction Co., Ltd

11/10/12 IPC1 $224,149.48

Kamping Pouy IPC1

Boeung Kanseng

CW10/11

Kong Piseh

Royal MekongConstruction Co. Ltd.

27/8/12 $134,773.48

CW12 Hunsen Baray Soeun SoknanConstruction Co., Ltd

23/10/12 IPC1 $348,403.61

Intermediate payment certificates have been received and under process from:

Ung Sim Sia Construction Co., Ltd., for CW2; sum $ 533,944.34 Date 30th

November

Ung Sim Sia Construction Co., Ltd., for CW2; sum $ 282,357.66 Date 31st

December

1.1.2. Civil Works Budget

The available funds for disbursement for Civil Works are updated and displayed in

Appendix 9 under Category 1. It is evident that the original and updated procurement

plan list estimated reconstruction work well above the actual amount available.

Together with the Stage 2 projects under construction (value US$ 4.42 million), the two

Stage 3 NCBs now in tender process and one ready for tendering (value US$ 4.03

million based on engineers estimates) amount to approximately US$ 8.5 million. The



amount presently available from both grant and loan sum US$ 8.6 million under

Category 1 of the loan plus the AusAid grant. The Krapeu Main Canal design has now

been completed and the engineers estimate is a further USD 1.16 million. The Lam

Laong spillway is approximately estimated at USD 0.31 million. The NWISP sub-

projects are tentatively estimated at USD 0.36 million. The Table below summarises

the estimated procurement package estimates compared against the available funds.

Table 6 Procurement Package Summary

List No. Contract Sub-project ProcurementPackageEstimate

Engineer’sEstimate

SelectedPackages

USD USD USD

Toul Skear additionalcanals

Toul Skear tail esc

1 CW1

Lam Laong spillway

2.84

0.31

2 CW4 Phdav Chum 2.6 2.6 2.6

Kor Aet3 CW5

Por Tatres0.73 0.73 0.73

4 CW6 Krapeu Main Canal 1.16 1.16 1.16

O Thnot

O Ansar

Prek Touch & Thom

5 CW13

Boeung Kvek

0.71 .710.71

6 CW15 NWISP 0.36 0.36

TOTALS STAGE 3 (estimates) 8.4 5.2 5.87

STAGE 2 (awarded) 4.24 4.24 4.24

TOTAL 12.64 9.44 10.11

Loan & Grant 8.6 8.6 8.6

Shortfall -4.04 -1.51

1.2. Procurement of equipment

The office equipment procurement is near completion; outstanding items include one

computer and handheld GPS equipment.

1.3. Vehicle Procurement

The Bank approved the purchase of all project vehicles on 11th July 2012 for $323,950.

Vehicles were procured by MEF as per the PP under the designated procurement

contract MEF-EQ1, which included 3 vehicles for the IA for Output 3 and delivered at

the end of October 2012.



1.4. NWISP Procurement

Following the flooding of 2011 and prior to FDERP formulation, at the request of ADB,

MOWRAM with the support of AFD and the TA consultants prepared designs and cost

estimates for emergency repairs to 9 sub-projects of the North West Irrigation Sector

Project (NWISP _ ADB Loan No. 2035-CAM (SF)). The intention was to contract the

original builders through direct contracting (it was too late for variation orders) to repair

the damaged works using the rates based on the previous contracts and with funding

using the remaining budget from the NWISP allocation. Although the PRC was in

agreement, the ADB at this stage reconsidered its position.

It was therefore agreed by the RGC and ADB during FDERP project preparation that

the Stage 2 interventions were to include payment for eight (8) NWISP sub-projects

using direct contracting (with documentation and designs already prepared) and

retroactive financing, and these were included in the procurement plan of the MOU for

funding through FDERP. In fact after more delays awaiting endorsement and no

objection from ADB, these projects were eventually placed in the FDERP Stage 3 in

the revised PP resulting from the ADB inception mission of July 2012. This is effectively

a change of scope and increase of work for Stage 3.

Thus, the designs for emergency reconstruction works date from November 2011 and

the scope of work and the bills of quantities require revision and updating. The early

estimates did not include mobilisation and other costs since it was assumed the original

contractors would be employed under DC as previously agreed with ADB and the

hence the cost estimates will be higher and during the negotiations with the DC

contractors amounted to some USD 0.36 million. The TA will commence reviewing the

NWSIP sub-projects listed for emergency reconstruction work next month.

2. Financial Progress

The IA mobilised the Financial Advisor on the 1st November. The second generation

imprest account (SGIA) was opened on 15th June 2012 and MEF deposited the first

advance of $70,000 on 15th August, 2012.

The administrative costs (Cat 04 of the ADB Loan allocations) are expected to be about

US$ 0.4 million as presently allocated (see Appendix 9). The PIU is responsible for

providing separate financial monthly reporting as confirmed in a meeting held with

PCMU on 2nd October 2012.

3. Consultants Services

3.1. Billing

The Bank Guarantee for the advance payment was submitted to the Client on 16th July,

the request for the advance of USD 340,068.00 was made on 20th July and payment

was made on 3rd September 2012. The first billing statement for services was



submitted on 18th October and included all invoices from March through September

and is with MOWRAM for processing. Billing for October to December is in preparation.

3.2. Payment Issues

The Consultant has requested approval for payment for services to,

a) Field data survey expenses _ to be billed under contingencies of the Consultant’s

agreement; the field data surveys incurred expenses which are now being

questioned by the PIU accountant even though they were approved. The supporting

documents for the FWUC training are also now in question. The expenses are small

and for the purposes of convening meetings with the beneficiaries.

b) Training costs for FWUC orientation and strengthening _ to be billed under

workshops/training of the Consultant’s agreement; the Consultant has ceased any

further direct funding for FWUC training until this matter is resolved. As mentioned

in the Inception Report the project documents did not plan for FWUC training as

there is no allocation for this.

3.3. Resources

Field Data Survey Staff; the quantity provided in the TOR and included in the

agreement did not allow for actual field survey requirements nor the need to collate and

input the large amount of data to be collected from the field from over 500 respondents

covering 4 provinces and many districts. The baseline survey alone used up more

resources than were allotted and there is a requirement for the post-project survey.

Per-Diem for National Staff; the per-diem quantity provided in the contract was

underestimated since it did not take into account the requirement for field personnel, in

particular the surveyors, inspectors and field data survey staff. During construction

period the inspectors will be deployed as well as the contract engineers for part of their

time for supervision services. The field data survey staff will also be engaged at the

end of construction for the after project socio-economic survey. Thus, 1600 additional

days for national staff per-diem has been estimated.

4. ADB Review Mission

The date for the midterm review mission that at project commencement was originally

tentatively scheduled for December 2012 has been postponed until mid February. The

date has not yet been set.


Flood Damage Emergency Reconstruction Project – Output 3: Irrigation and FloodControl Version 1

Appendix 1 Subprojects location map



Appendix 2 Overall Sub-projects Implementation Schedule - December 2012

6 Krapoeu Main Canal

Identify and preparation

Brief resettlement and environment screening

Subproject Profile

Topographic and Other surveys

GIS mapping and construction drawings

Detailed design

Tendering Process

Construction & defect liability

7 O Ansar



Subproject Profile



Detailed design

Tendering Process


8 Boeung Kvek



Subprojest Profile



Detailed design

Tendering Process


9 Lam Loang



Subproject Profile



Detailed design

Tendering Process


10 Toul Skear



Subproject Profile



Detailed design

Tendering Process


No ItemYear 2012 Year 2013 Year 2014 Year 2015

Jan

Feb

Mar

Ap

r

May

Ju

n

Ju

l

Au

g

Sep

Oc

t

No

v

Dec

Jan

Feb

Mar

Ap

r

May

Ju

n

Ju

l

Au

g

Sep

Oc

t

No

v

Dec

Jan

Feb

Mar

Ap

r

May

Ju

n

Ju

l

Au

g

Sep

Oc

t

No

v

Dec

Jan

Feb

Mar

Ap

r



6 Krapoeu Main Canal



Subproject Profile



Detailed design

Tendering Process


7 O Ansar



Subproject Profile



Detailed design

Tendering Process


8 Boeung Kvek



Subprojest Profile



Detailed design

Tendering Process


9 Lam Loang



Subproject Profile



Detailed design

Tendering Process


10 Toul Skear



Subproject Profile



Detailed design

Tendering Process


Ma

r

Ap

r

No

v

De

c

Ja

n

Feb

Ju

l

Au

g

Se

p

Oct

Ma

r

Ap

r

Ma

y

Ju

n

No

v

De

c

Ja

n

Feb

Ju

l

Au

g

Se

p

Oct

Ma

r

Ap

r

Ma

y

Ju

n

Year 2014 Year 2015

Ja

n

Feb

Ma

r

Ap

r

Ma

y

Ju

n

Ju

l

Au

gNo ItemYear 2012 Year 2013

Se

p

Oct

No

v

De

c

Ja

n

Feb



Appendix 3 Procurement Implementation Dates for Civil Works

Project ID. FLOOD DAMAGE EMERGENCY RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT OUTPUT 3 - Irrigation and Flood Control Credit/TF No: ADB Loan 2852-CAM (SF)

IA MOWRAM AusAID Grant 0285-CAM (EF)

Updated DECEMBER 2012

FDERP-MOWRAM-CW1Emergency Repair of Lamlaong and Toul Skea Canal

in Prey Veng Province$1.23 m DC 28-Dec-12

Engineer's Estimate $ 1,135,289.80

FDERP-MOWRAM-CW2Emergency Repair of Ork Ambok canal and Boeung

Kampleing in Prey Veng Province$1.35 m DC 28-Dec-12

Engineer's Estimate 1.35 m

FDERP-MOWRAM-CW9Emergency Repair of Beoung Kak canal and Srok

Dam in Kampong Cham province$0.23 m DC 28-Oct-12

Engineer's Estimate $ 327,968.91

FDERP-MOWRAM-CW10/11Emergency Repair of Kamping Pouy Irrigation

Structure in Battambang Province$0.50 m DC 28-Jan-13


FDERP-MOWRAM-CW12Emergency Repair of Hun Sen's Baray in Kampong

Thom Province$0.68 m DC 28-Dec-12


4,424,613.04

FDERP-MOWRAM-CW3Emergency Repair of Lamlaong and Toul Skea in

Prey Veng Province$2.84 m NCB Post Plan 12-Nov-12 03-Dec-12 8-Dec-12 7-Jan-13 28-Jan-13 18-Feb-13 11-Mar-13

Engineer's Estimate $2.84 m? Actual

FDERP-MOWRAM-CW4Emergency Repair of Phdav Chum in Kampong

Cham$2.13 m Plan 26-Oct-12 16-Nov-12 21-Nov-12 21-Dec-12 11-Jan-13 1-Feb-13 22-Feb-13

Engineer's Estimate $2.6 m Actual 18-Oct-12 18-Dec-12 20-Dec-12 22-Jan-13

FDERP-MOWRAM-CW5Emergency Repair of Kor Aet and Por Tatres in

Kampong Cham$1.00 m Plan 21-Sep-12 12-Oct-12 17-Oct-12 16-Nov-12 7-Dec-12 28-Dec-12 18-Jan-13

Engineer's Estimate $727,279 Actual 12-Oct-12 16-Nov-12 23-Nov-12 17-Jan-13

FDERP-MOWRAM-CW6Emergency Repair of Krapeu main canal in Siem

Reap Province$2.00 m NCB Post Plan 12-Nov-12 03-Dec-12 8-Dec-12 7-Jan-13 28-Jan-13 18-Feb-13 11-Mar-13

Engineer's Estimate $1.16 m Actual

FDERP-MOWRAM CW13

Emergency Repair of Prek Touch&Prek Thom, O

Ansar, O Thnot, and Boeng Kvek in Kampong Thom

Province

$0.32 m NCB Post Plan 26-Oct-12 16-Nov-12 21-Nov-12 21-Dec-12 11-Jan-13 1-Feb-13 22-Feb-13

Engineer's Estimate $707,407 Actual

FDERP-MOWRAM CW15 Emergency Repair of NWISP sub-projects $0.22 m NCB Post Plan

Engineer's Estimate $0.36 m ? Actual

Contract

Completion

DateNOL Date

28-Jun-12

28-Jun-12

5-Jun-12

5-Jun-12

877,937.4928-Jun-12

28-Jun-12

28-Jun-12

1,140,859.39

1,188,483.46

318,842.81

898,489.89

STAGE 3 CIVIL WORKS

17-May-12

17-May-12

17-May-12

17-May-1208-May-12

08-May-12

08-May-12

08-May-12

Actual

STAGE 2 CIVIL WORKS

5-Jun-12

Procurement Method and Implementation Dates; scheduled and actual

SubmittedDate

Contract Amount

USD

Invitation for

Bids

Date

Bid Opening

Date

Prior / PostReview

Plan

versus

Actual

BIDDING PROCESS

NCB Prior

NCB Prior

08-May-12

5-Jun-12

17-May-12

5-Jun-12

DescriptionContract Package No.

Total Estimated

Cost PP/Eng.

Est. (USD)

Method ofProcurement

Comment

CONTRACT PROCESS

Soeun Soknan/Seak

Cheav Leng Joint Venture

Mea Sovuthidy Construction

Co., Ltd.

Bid Evaluation Report

Ung Sang Sia

Construction Co., Ltd.

Ponleu Banteay Srey

Construction Co., Ltd.

Royal Mekong

Construction Co., Ltd

Component

Supplier/ Contractor

NameNOL Date

Bidding Document Contract

Signature

DateSubmitted

Date

4-May-124-May-1224-Apr-12

4-May-1224-Apr-12

Actual

Actual

Actual

Actual

24-Apr-12 4-May-12

4-May-12

4-May-12

4-May-124-May-1224-Apr-12

24-Apr-12 4-May-12 4-May-12



Appendix 4 Procurement Implementation Dates for Goods

Project ID. FLOOD DAMAGE EMERGENCY RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT OUTPUT 3 - Irrigation and Flood Control Credit/TF No: ADB Loan 2852-CAM (SF)

IA MOWRAM AusAID Grant 0285-CAM (EF)

Updated DECEMBER 2012

GOODS

EQ1 Proc of Computers & Printers 24,000 Shopping Prior Plan 21-Aug-12 7-Sep-12 12-Sep-12 19-Sep-12 24-Sep-12 $24,606.00 Narita Distribution Cambodia Co. Ltd.

ActualColor Multi Function Printer

Notebook

Desktop Computer for Graphics Design

Desktop Computer

UPS Power Tree

EQ2 Proc. Of Office Equipment 17,000 Shopping Post Plan 21-Aug-12 7-Sep-12 12-Sep-12 19-Sep-12 24-Sep-12 $16,381.00Actual

Multifunction Photocopier

Laser Fax

Data Back Up Drive

Digital Camera

GPS

Bid Evaluation ReportBidding DocumentDescriptionContract Package No.

Total

Estimated

Cost PP/Eng.

Est. (USD)

Method ofProcurement

Prior / PostReview

Planversus

ActualNOL Date

Submitted

Date

Submitted

Date

Invitation for

Bids

Date

Bid OpeningDate

Comment

CONTRACT PROCESS

Contract

Signature

Date

Component

Supplier/ Contractor Name

Procurement Method and Implementation Schedule

Contract AmountUSD

BIDDING PROCESS

NOL Date



Appendix 5 Consulting Services Implementation Schedule

CONSULTING SERVICES IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE

2012

ContractUsed up to

31 Dec. 2012

Balance as

of 31 Dec

2012

INTERNATIONAL

1. Mark SCHIELE Egis Eau Team Leader / Irrigation Engineer 19.00 7.53 11.47

2. June MENDOZA Egis Eau Procurement Specialist 3.00 1.00 2.00

3. Francisco REGONAS Egis Eau Design Engineer 6.00 5.93 0.07

4. Badre LANEDRI Egis Eau Community Devt./FWUC Specialist 2.00 0.54 1.46

5. Miquel Guioguio Egis Eau Socio-Economist 2.00 1.00 1.00

TOTAL (1): TOTAL (1): 32.00 16.00 16.00

DOMESTIC

1. Mr. Khoun Sambo KCC Deputy T/L / Irrigation Design Engineer33.00 9.87 23.13

2. Mr. Chroeung Phanna KCC Contract Engineer -Assist. RE 1 24.00 6.20 17.80

3. Mr. Kheang Sovann KCC Contract Engineer -Assist. RE 2 22.00 6.00 16.00

4. Mr. Prek Savy KCC Contract Engineer -Assist. RE 3 21.00 6.20 14.80

5. Mr. Mel Sophanna KCC Resettlement Specialist 8.00 4.87 3.13

6. Mr. Ouk Chantha KCC Agric.Socio - Economist 5.00 5.00 -

8. Mr. Toch Bonvongsa KCC Hydrologist 8.00 6.00 2.00

9. Mr. Sophal Tit KCC Surveyor 12.00 3.50 8.50

10. Mr. Sin Kosal KCC Procurement (bid documents) 12.00 2.74 9.26

11. Mr. Im Mavuth KCC FWUC Specialist 12.00 5.30 6.70

7. Mr. Ngnoun Pich KCC Structural Engineer 5.00 5.00 -

12. Mr. Tak Virekvath KCC O&M Engineer 8.00 4.40 3.60

13. Mr. Hem Motha KCC GIS/autocad and mapping specialist 3.00 2.00 1.00

14. Ms. Kol Pra Pey KCC Labour and gender specialist 2.00 1.27 0.73

15. Mr. Sour Chheang You KCC Environmental Specialist 6.00 3.57 2.43

16. KCC Field Data Survey Staff 15.00 16.60 (1.60) .

17.1 KCC Inspectors (6 No.) 33.00 3.20 29.80

17.2 KCC Assistant topo. surveyor (6 No.) 18.00 14.82 3.18

TOTAL (2): 247.00 106.54 140.46

TOTAL (1+2): TOTAL (1+2): 279.00 122.54 156.46

National Less items 16 & 17 181.00 71.92 109.08Proposed changes to Input- reductionProposed changes to Input- addition

Year 2015

DECEMBER

Year 2012 Year 2013Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4

NAME FIRM POSITION

Person-monthsQ 1 Q 2

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

Ma

y

Jun

Ma

y

Jun

July

Aug

ust

Se

pt

Oct

Nov

Dec

No

Year 2014Q 1 Q 2 Q3 Q4

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

Dec

Ma

y

Jun

Jul

Aug

Dec

Ma

y

Jun

Jul

Nov

Aug

Sep

Oct

Sep

Oct

Nov

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

Scheduled ADB Loan

Closing dateProject implementation

completion date

Services agreement

Urgent services

period



Appendix 6 Summary of TA consultant experts’ mobilization

MONTH DECEMBER 2012 (tentative*)

Contract Total Used Balance

(21 st June

2012)

to 31

December

2012

(as of 31

December

2012)

1 19.00 7.53 11.47

2 3.00 1.00 2.00

3 6.00 5.93 0.07

4 2.00 0.54 1.46

5 2.00 1.00 1.00

32.00 16.00 16.00

1 33.00 9.87 23.13

2 24.00 6.20 17.80

3 22.00 6.00 16.00

4 21.00 6.20 14.80

5 8.00 4.87 3.13

6 5.00 5.00 0.00

7 8.00 6.00 2.00

8 12.00 3.50 8.50

9 12.00 2.74 9.26

10 12.00 5.30 6.70

11 5.00 5.00 0.00

12 8.00 4.40 3.60

13 3.00 2.00 1.00

14 2.00 1.27 0.73

15 6.00 3.57 2.43

16 15.00 16.60 -1.60

17 51.00 18.02 32.98

247.00 106.54 140.46

* Note the actual used amounts are dependant on timesheets submitted

Labour and gender specialist

Environmental Specialist

Total 2 - National

Procurement (bid documents)

FWUC Specialist

O&M Engineer

GIS/autocad and mapping specialist

Field Survey Staff (3 No.)

Asst Surveyors/Inspectors (6 No.)

Agric.Socio - Economist

Structural Engineer

Hydrologist

Surveyor

Contract Engineer 1

Contract Engineer 2

Contract Engineer 3

Resettlement Specialist

Total 1 - International

2. National Experts (*)

Deputy Team Leader /Irrigation Engineer

Team Leader /Irrigation Specialist

Design Engineer

Community Development-WU Specialist

Sociologist-Economist

Procurement Specialist

1. International Experts

STATUS OF TA CONSULTANT EXPERTS’ MOBILISATION

4th Quarter: October to December 2012

Remarks /Periods of

expert’s availability

EXPERT

Amounts in person-months



Appendix 7 Reports submitted to date

Document Date Reference Name Remarks

26th

March 2012 Contractor Selection Report–Stage 2

27th

March 2012 Field Trip Report Battambang

31st

March 2012 Field Trip Report Toul Skear

26/27 April 2012 Field Trip Report K. Cham; Siem Riep

23/24 May 2012 Field Trip Report K. Cham; K. Thom

8th

June 2012 Contract Negotiation Report-Stage 2 5 contract packages

26th

June 2012 FDERP-DM-1-0612 Inception Planning

29th

June 2012 FDERP-DM-5-0612 Topographic Surveys-Stage 3 DRAFT

29th

June 2012 FDERP-DM-5-0612 Topographic Surveys-Stage 3 FINAL

30th

June 2012 FDERP-DM-4-0612 TOR for Supervision DRAFT

15th

July 2012 Report for ADB Inception Mission

16th

July 2012 Supervision Reporting Hun Sen Baray

16th

July 2012 Supervision Reporting Kamping Pouy

25th

July 2012 Supervision Reporting Hun Sen Baray

31st

July 2012 Supervision Reporting QC – Ung Sim Sia

1st

August 2012 Supervision Reporting Ork Ambok

1st

August 2012 Supervision Reporting Boueng Kamplienh

1st

August 2012 Supervision Reporting Boueng Kak

1st

August 2012 Supervision Reporting Srok Dam

7th

August 12Ung Sim Sia Construction Material’s Test Result Ork Ambok & Boeung

Kamplienh

13th

August 2012 FDERP-MR-1-0712 Monthly Report JULY

17th

August 2012 Supervision Reporting QC-Meas Sovathidy

17th

August 12Meas Sovuthidy Construction Material’s Test Result Toul Skear and Lam

Loang

22nd

August 2012FDERP-SPP-01-0812

Sub-project Profile Report Por Tatres

23rd


Sub-project Profile report Phdav Chum

24th

August 2012 Supervision Reporting Kamping Puoy

24th

August 2012Supervision Reporting Boeung Kanseng and

Kong Piseth

28th


Sub-project Profile Report Kor Aet

30th

August 2012 FDERP-R1-0812 Inception Report DRAFT

5th

September 12 Labor and Gender Action Plan Specialist’s report

6th

September 12 FDERP-MR-2-0812 Monthly Report AUGUST

6th

September 12 Supervision Report Lam Loang

6th

September 12 Supervision Report Hunsen Baray

9th

Sep 2012Punloeu BanteaySrey

Field density tests Srok Dam

9th

Sep 2012Punloeu BanteaySrey

Field density tests Boeung Kak




10th

Sep 2012 FDERP-R1-0812 Inception Report Version 1

17th

Sep 2012 Soeun Soknan Construction Material’s Test Result Hun Sen Baray

20th

Sep 2012 Soeun Soknan Field density tests Hun Sen Baray

21st

Sep 2012TL/PIU/048 NCB Document for FDERP-

MOWRAM-CW-5Kor Aet Sub-project

25th

Sep 2012Supervision Report Kamping Puoy Sub-

project

26th

Sep 2012 Sub-project Profile – Version 2 Kor Aet Sub-project

26th

Sept 12 Supervision Report Kamping Puoy

26th

Sept 12 FDERP-R1-0812 Inception Report Version 2

2nd

Oct 2012 Sub-project Profile- Version 2 Por Tatres Sub-project

3rd

Oct 2012Supervision Report Ork Ambok, Toul Skear

and Hunsen Baray sub-projects

9th

Oct 2012 FDERP-MR-2-0912 Monthly Report SEPTEMBER

12th

Oct 2012NCB- FDERP-MOWRAM- CW5 Kor Aet and Por Tatres

Sub-projects

18th

Oct 2012Sub-project Profile- Version 2 Phdav Chum Sub-

project

18th

Oct 2012NCB-FDERP-MOWRAM-4 Phdav Chum Sub-

project

19th

Oct 2012NCB-FDERP-MOWRAM-5- revisedin accordance with the second set ofcomments from PCMU/MEF

Kor Aet and Por TatresSub-projects

30th

Oct 2012FDERP-SPP-04-1012

Sub-project Profile O Thnot sub-project

6th

Nov 2012

Supervision Engineer Report Kamping Puoy, BoeungKansen, Kong Piseth,Ork Ambok, Toul Skearand Hun Sen Baray sub-projects

6th

Nov 2012 FDERP-MR-2-1012 Monthly Report OCTOBER

12th

Nov 2012FDERP-SPP-05-1112

Sub-project profile Prek Touch and PrekThom sub-project

16th

Nov 2012Supervision Engineer Report Kamping Puoy sub-

project

21st

Nov 2012NCB Document for contract No.FDERP-MOWRAM-CW5 andInvitation letter for Bid

Kor Aet and Por Tatressub-projects

26th

Nov 2012 IEE Report All stage 3 sub-project

30th

Nov 2012FDERP-SPP-06-1112

Sub-project profile O Ansar sub-project

4th

Dec 2012Supervision Engineer Report Kamping Puoy sub-

project

6th

Dec 2012 Monthly Report NOVEMBER

6th

Dec 2012FDERP-SPP-07-1112

Sub-project profile Boeung Kvek sub-project

17th

Dec 2012Addendum Extension to BidSubmission

Kor Aet and Por Tatressub-projects




18th

Dec 2012NCB document re-bidding Kor Aet and Por Tatres

sub-projects

19th

Dec 2012 NCB document for CW4 Phdav Chum sub-project

31st

Dec 2012FDERP-SPP-08-1012

Sub-project profile (Vers.02) Krapeu Main Canal



Appendix 8 People Met

MOWRAM/IA

Mr. Bak Bunna, Project Manager

Mr. Huong Sunthan; Procurement Officer/PIU

Mr. Sek Hieng, Technical Officer/PIU

PDOWRAM/IA

Mr. Nov Dara, Prey Veng PDWRAM Officer

Mr. Chea Cherm, Prey Veng PDWRAM Officer

PCMU/MEF

Mr. Terry. D. Woods, PCMU/Team Leader

Mr. Hir Samnang, PCMU/ National Consultant

Mr. Savath, PCMU/National Procurement

LOCAL AUTHORITY

Mr. Sorn Saroeun, Lam Laong Village Chief, Chrey Khmom commune, Sithor Kandal

district, Prey Veng Province

Mr. Touch Try, Commune Chief, Korkthlok Loeu commune, Chi Kreng district, Siem Reap

Province

Mr. Ou Pheap,Deputy Commune Committee, Korkthlok Leu commune, Chi Kreng district,

Siem Reap Province

Mr.Thou Seng, Commune Chief, Baray commune, Baray District, Kampong Thom

Province

FWUC/FARMER

Mr. Lay Ry, FWUC Leader, Lam Laong Sub-project Prey veng Province

Mr. Heng Teum, Deputy FWUC Leader, Lam Laong sub-project, Prey Veng Province

Mr. Oun Eun, Deputy FWUC Leader, Lam Laong sub-project, Prey Veng Province

Mr. Morng Moeun, CSC chief, Kor Aet sub-project, Kampong Cham Province

Mr. Hov Hon, CSC vice chief, Kor Aet sub-project, Kampong Cham Province

Mr. Phai Sorl, CSC vice chief, Kor Aet sub-project, Kampong Cham Province

Mr. Horl Rane, CSC member, Kor Aet sub-project, Kampong Cham Province

Mr. Seth Vorn, CSC member, Kor Aet sub-project, Kampong Cham Province

Mr. Sean Theng, CSC member, Kor Aet sub-project, Kampong Cham Province

Mr. Srorn Loth, CSC member, Kor Aet sub-project, Kampong Cham Province

Mr. Meas Sakoeun, CSC chief, O Thnot sub-project, Kampong Thom Province

Mr. Hin Thol, CSC vice chief, O Thnot sub-project, Kampong Thom Province

Mrs. Tep Mao, CSC vice chief, O Thnot sub-project, Kampong Thom Province

Mrs. Gnim Socheat, CSC member, O Thnot sub-project, Kampong Thom Province

Mr. Sim Mane, CSC member, O Thnot sub-project, Kampong Thom Province

Mr. Sok Chheng, CSC member, O Thnot sub-project, Kampong Thom Province

Mr. Sok Chhem, CSC member, O Thnot sub-project, Kampong Thom Province

Mr. Sok Chheng long, CSC member, O Thnot sub-project, Kampong Thom Province

Mrs. Nut Savy, CSC member, Prek Touch and Prek Thom sub-project, Kampong Thom

Province

Mr. Hin Yoeung, CSC member, Prek Touch and Prek Thom sub-project, Kampong Thom

Province



Mr. Tim Kim Eng, CSC member, Prek Touch and Prek Thom sub-project, Kampong Thom

Province

Mr. Svay Song, CSC member, Prek Touch and Prek Thom sub-project, Kampong Thom

Province

Mr. Meas Sakoeun, CSC chief, O Thnot sub-project, Kampong Thom Province

Mr. Hin Thol, CSC vice chief, O Thnot sub-project, Kampong Thom Province

Mrs. Tep Mao, CSC vice chief, O Thnot sub-project, Kampong Thom Province

Mrs. Gnim Socheat, CSC member, O Thnot sub-project, Kampong Thom Province

Mr. Sim Mane, CSC member, O Thnot sub-project, Kampong Thom Province

Mr. Sok Chheng, CSC member, O Thnot sub-project, Kampong Thom Province

Mr. Sok Chhem, CSC member, O Thnot sub-project, Kampong Thom Province

Mr. Sok Chheng long, CSC member, O Thnot sub-project, Kampong Thom Province



Appendix 9 Summary of ADB Loan Costs

Spent

/Committed

Estimated

Further

Expenditure

Total

Expected

Available

AusAID

Grant

Available

Loan

Alloc*

Amount

over Alloc

$ $ $ m $ m $ m

Cat 01: Civil Works (Construction of Subprojects) 12.81 1.00 7.60 -4.21

CW1 Stage 2 Lam Laong &Toul Skear 1,140,859 1.14

CW2 Stage 2 Ork Ambok & Boeung Kamplienh 1,188,483 1.19

CW3 Stage 3 Lam Laong &Toul Skear** 360,000 0.36

Lam Laong &Toul Skear 2,480,000 2.48

CW4 Stage 3 Phdav Chum 2,593,011 2.59

CW5 Stage 3 Kor Aet and Por Tatres 727,279 0.73

CW6 Stage 3 Krapeu Main Canal 1,159,995 1.16

CW9 Stage 2 Srok Dam & Boeung Kak 318,843 0.32

CW10/11 Stage 2 Kamping Pouy; Kong Piseth & Boeung Kanseng 898,490 0.90

CW12 Stage 2 Hun Sen Baray 877,937 0.88

CW13 Stage 3 Prek Touch/Thom, O Thnot, Boeung Kvek 707,407 0.71

O Ansar -

CW15 Stage 3 NWISP sub-projects 360,000 0.36

- -

- -

- -

- -

Cat 02: Vehicles and Equipment 0.15 0.12 -0.03

Vehicles etc 88,350 0.09

EQ1 Motorcycles (deduct VAT for ADB) 7,800 0.01

EQ2 Office equipment (deduct VAT for ADB) 41,600 0.04

EQ3 Office furniture 8,400 0.01

Cat 03: Consulting Services 1.36 1.36 0.00

Egis Eau 1,360,275 1.36

Cat 04: Incremental and Adminstrative Costs 0.41 0.42 0.01

PIU/overhead costs to - -

Cat 05: Interest Charge During Implementation - 0.00 0.00

approximate to - -

Cat 06: Unallocated - 0.00 0.00

- -

Total 14.73 1.00 9.50 -4.23

* Source: ADB Loan Financial Information Services (LFIS), as of 02-Jan-13 Loan no. 2852-CAM (SF)

** Essential works; completion of emergency reconstruction initiated in Stage 2

Percentage basis for withdrawal from loan. 100% of total expenditure claimed exclusive of taxes and duties

Summary of Estimated Expenditure from the ADB Loan _ Output 3-Irrigation and Flood Control

Category and description



Appendix 10 Progress Summary for Output 3 Activities from DMF

ACTIVITY FROM DMF STATUS COMMENTS

OUTPUT 3 – IRRIGATION AND FLOOD CONTROL

Activity: Irrigation facilities rehabilitated and reconstructed

26 flood-damaged irrigation

schemes covering about 25,000

ha are reconstructed by 2015.

Civil works for emergency reconstruction

for 10 sub-projects covering 13,911 ha of

WS and DS rice production area are under

construction under Stage 2 as per the

procurement plan (PP)

10 sub-projects have been identified for

Stage 3 implementation. Three (3) sub-

project profiles submitted and received no-

objection to continue to detailed design and

bidding. Four (4) sub-projects await no-

objection to continuation.

The performance target is given as 35 in the PAM and not 26 as in RRP. Actual number in any

case dependant on

a) conformance with project selection criteria for Stage 3 sub-projects andb) availability of funds in the loan allocation which is considerably less than the procurement plan list.

Present projection for number of schemes rehabilitated is: 10 in Stage 2 plus 10 in Stage 3 plus 8 morefrom NWISP, ie 28 numberStage 2 WS & DS production area = 13,911 ha (10 sub-projects)Stage 3 WS & DS production area (NCBs in tender or ready for bidding) = 8,853 ha (7 sub-projects )

Biggest risk lies most likely in the time period to be incurred for procurement procedures and insufficientfunds_Total value of sub-projects prepared for bidding Stage3 to date approx $8.45m out of total available$8.6 m

At least 30% of unskilled labour

hired are women

Contract specifications include

requirement for Contractor to provide

monthly reports disaggregated on

gender for unskilled labour


Appendix 11 Stage 3 subprojects

SELECTION LIST OF CONTRACTS FOR STAGE 3 Updated as of December 2012

Selection

screeningPriority

PP estimate

Amount

PP Package

estimate US$Comments

NCB Bid

estimateArea

Wet Dry E N US$ US$ ha

1 Lamlaong spillway Sithor Kandal Prey Veng - 800 1 532,619 1,300,046 560,000 Completion of Stage 2 Works already

included in Stage 2

$170,000

2 Toul Skea tail escape Por Rieng Prey Veng 1,500 2,000 1 538,226 1,270,482 2,282,460 Completion of Stage 2 Works already

included in Stage 2

$80,000

Toul Skea major

works

2 Main canals, bulk supply canal,

secondary canals

$2,480,000

3 CW4 Phdav Chum Batheay Kampong Cham 2,730 1,918 √ 1 500,422 1,327,744 1,710,000 2.13 Million Major flood protection dyke $2,593,011 8 $5,834,275 $972,379 $2,593,011 $2,593,011 4,648

5 CW5 Kor Aet Batheay Kampong Cham 380 650 √ 1 491,805 1,329,990 403,500 1.00 Million Flood spreading, polder $482,984

Por Tatres Batheay Kampong Cham - 1,052 √ 1 492,060 1,336,780 422,415 $244,294

6 CW6 Krapeu Main Canal Chi Kreng Siem Reap 4,000 500 ? 2 426,928 1,460,458 2,000,000 2.00 Million Maybe $1M; needs RA $1,159,995 8 $2,609,989 $434,998 $1,159,995

7 Prek Touch & Prek

Thom

Prasat Sambo Kampong Thom 800 150 √ 1 512,573 1,421,738 129,888 Flood control, diversion storage, dyke

repair + structures

$204,349

8 O Ansar Kampong Svay Kampong Thom 250 150 √ 2 498,932 1,410,645 71,129 Flood spreading, diversion storage,

dyke repair

$101,540

9 O Thnot Sandan Kampong Thom 218 60 √ 1 523,734 1,444,112 83,494 Reservoir system-dyke repair $302,844

10 Boeung Kvek Sandan Kampong Thom 375 120 √ 2 523,355 1,440,884 6,278 Flood spreading, diversion storage -

dyke repair, no scheme, fwuc?

$102,340

11 Ta Seom Angkor Chum Siem Reap 196 √ 2 $42,947 4

Kork Thnong Angkor Chum Siem Reap 154 √ 2 $19,817 4

Don Aov Bovel Battambong 1,101 √ 2 $37,052 4

Po Pi Deum Mongol Borey B. Menchey 1,142 √ 2 $36,380 3

Canal No.1 Thmorkoul Battambong 982 √ 2 $30,976 3

Chork Moung Russey Battambong 1,372 √ 2 $9,446 1

Krouch Saeuch Bakan Pursat 790 √ 2 $21,212 1

Punley Phnom Srok B. Menchey 440 118 √ 2 $24,070 1

No. of schemes 19 Total 16,430 7,518 $7,889,164 Provisional estimate to date $8,143,257 $8,253,257 $4,031,362 8,853

Note: Screening Priority from High to Low = 1 to 4; Selection 1 or 2

Stage 2 contracts let $4,424,613

$8,455,975

$711,072 2,123

CW

15-N

WIS

Ppr

ojec

ts

Contract

implementation

Period (months)

Min

Turnover

Reqd.

220,000

6 $2,133,217

$2,181,8376

Province

Irrigation Scheme

Area (ha)

CW13 0.32 Million

CW3 2.84 Million

Design

Estimate

CoordinatesList

No.

Proc.

PlanName of Sub-project District

NCB credit

criteria

Estimate Total Stage 2 & 3 (to date)

$355,536

$363,639

$221,900

Package

Engineers

Estimate

$727,279

$711,072

$727,279 2,082

$2,840,000



Appendix 12 Bid Advertising – CW5

Advertisement for Invitation for Bids for FDERP-MOWRAM-CW5 NCB placed in the Rasmei

Kampuchea Daily Newspaper on Weds. 19th

December 2012



Advertisement for Invitation for Bids for FDERP-MOWRAM-CW5 NCB placed in the

Kampuchea Thmey Daily Newspaper on Weds. 19th

December 2012



Advertisement for Invitation for Bids for FDERP-MOWRAM-CW4 NCB placed in the Rasmei

Kampuchea Daily Newspaper on Weds. 19th

December 2012



Advertisement for Invitation for Bids for FDERP-MOWRAM-CW4 NCB placed in the

Kampuchea Thmey Daily Newspaper on Weds. 19th

December 2012



Appendix 13 LGAP Monitoring Table

As month of December, 2012

Project Title: Flood Damage Emergency Reconstruction Project (FDERP)

Country: Cambodia

Project No. 46009

Type of Project (Loan/ TA): ADB Loan No. 2852-CAM(SF) & AusAID Grant No.0285-CAM(EF)

Approval and Timeline: March 2012 – March 2015

Gender Category: SGB

Mission Leader:

Project Impact: Economic and social recovery from the 2011 floods in project provinces

Project Outcome: Restoration of critical public and social infrastructure assets necessary to restore livelihoods and access in

project provinces that will secure the social infrastructure services against future flooding. Assets are rebuilt

back to their original standards or better.

Activities, Indicators and Targets,

Timeframe and Responsibility

Progress to Date

(This should include information on period of actual implementation, sex-

disaggregated qualitative and quantitative updates (e.g. number of participating

women, women beneficiaries of services, etc.))

Issues and Challenges

(Please include reasons why an activity was not fully

implemented, or if targets fall short, or reasons for

delay, etc.)



Output 3: Irrigation and flood control (MOWRAM)

3.1. Civil works will be based on labor-based appropriate technology:(Contractors will prioritize and report onthe use of local unskilled labor(throughsubcontracting)

Responsibility: MOWRAM / PDWRAM /

Contractor & TA Consultant (Engineers,

National Labor & gender specialist)

Period: 01 to 31 /12/ 2012

- Unskilled women and men were given orientation on Labor-based appropriatetechnology (LBAT) before the start of construction.

- Local labor was utilized by construction site, except cooks they followed theirhusband from other provinces

- The contractor personnel and engineer’s, in all targets province were orientedon LGAP monitoring tools and the core labor standard of “equal pay for equalwork “during the duration of the project implementation.

- Perception of the Contractor and other stakeholderinvolve in the project implementation that “womenare not interest to work in irrigation constructionproject as it is a job performed mostly by men “mayprevent them to recruit more women to work in theproject.

- This perception is contrary to what women in theproject areas think. The women are interest to workin the project as they have no jobs, and they wantto earn income for their household basic needs(e.g. buy food, medicines for children education,etc.)

- There is lack of cooperation and monitoring fromvillages authority to encourage participation ofwomen in work construction.

3.2. At least 30% of unskilled labor hired willbe women (through conditions in biddocuments)

- Based on the report submitted by construction site on December, 2012 itshown that: an average percentage of unskilled women hired for the 5 projectsCW1, CW2 & CW9, CW 10/11, and CW12 is 23%.

CW-1 : Toul Skear 43 % % unskilled women were hired (19 unskilled

female workers out of 43 workers).

CW-2: Ork Ambok 0.00 % unskilled women were hired (0 unskilled female

workers out of 9 workers) and Boeung Kamplienh 10 % unskilled women

were hired (4 unskilled female workers out of 40 workers).

CW9 : Was completed in September,12 ( Please refer to data on previous

month)

CW10/11: Kamping Puoy 0.00 % unskilled women were hired ( 0 unskilled

female workers out of 21 workers), Beoung Kanseng & Kong Piseth 39 %

- During the dry season-farming season most of menare busy with work outside and the women arebusy with housework and child care.

- Construction works are not permanent andtherefore most of female unskilled labor has toleave and work outside the village (e.g. Phnom-Penh, Thailand) and this issue has beenexacerbated by the fact that the cost of the labor inthe village is usually very low, so it is difficult toencourage women to participate in the constructionworks.

- Tools and equipment are not always available inthe right dimensions for women to carry out thecheap, unskilled and heavy labor of carryingmaterials, and little control over task demands or






Period: 01 to 31 /12/ 2012

unskilled women were hired ( 9 unskilled female workers out of 26

workers),

CW12: 17 % unskilled women were hired (2 unskilled female workers out

of 12 workers).

- Overall: Total number of the women unskilled labour in December 2012 was151 workers 34 women equal 23%

design of the work station and equipment this cancause problems.

- Construction works are not permanent and difficultto find more work and on the other hand womenmore respond to the families than men such ashousework.

- Lack of support from families to participant incommunity work such as joint meeting and otheractivities.

3.3. Contractors will uphold the Core LaborStandards, including not employingchild labor




Period: 01 to 31 /12/ 2012

- No “child labor” was hired by the contractor since project start November andDecember 2012

- This entails continuous monitoring and remindersfor all parties involve.

3.4. Men and women will receive equal payfor equal work

- The gender perspective strives to improve the understanding of the principleof equal remuneration for men and women and to ensure good practice.

- The project contractors were oriented on policy of equal pay for equal work.- It was also identified that, the level of labor payment was also still slightly

different between man and women. For example, women could earnbetween16, 000 riel to 20,000 riel per day, while men received up to 20000Riels per day. The level of payment can also be negotiated based on the localmarketing price.

- Women lack support and motivation from men inparticipating in the irrigation construction work.

- The labor cost providing to women is low or cheap,which cannot economically appropriate to thesupport the living.

- Invisibility of gender concerns in any matters, whichinclude technical choices for irrigation constructionwork and management.






Period: 01 to 31 /12/ 2012

- The common activities that women have done during the constructionincluding the collection of stone, planting grass, steel assembly, stonelaying on the slope of channel, transport concrete, cleaning site andsupplementary works such as cooking and washing. ) Some time, womenwere also attending meetings and other discussions as needed by the localcontractor.

- In additional it was found that women are more involved in conflict resolution,making decision and follow-up used of irrigation system in location for FWUC.

- FWUCs work is voluntary, so they are not fullyparticipated and, thus, it leads to the delayed in theactivities implementation. The lack of incentivesupport to their volunteer work was often reportedas the key constraint, undermining the ability toperform their active role.

3.5. Irrigation canals will only be selected forrehabilitation if they have functioningFarmer Water User Committeesreflecting women’s concerns

- Conduct gender mainstreaming awareness

training to FWUCs




Period: 01 to 31 /12/ 2012

- There were awareness for based road and irrigation safety conducted in theproject areas by contractor in cooperating with community authority such asroad protection, traffic law no. 01 for the policy sustainable implementing ofthe irrigations system and management and gender mainstreaming in theirrigations system.

- The women unskilled labor had agreed in principle that, since the project wasimplemented, the level of violence against women unskilled labor, especiallybitten up by husbands, had decreased significantly in all target communities.

- A majority of women unskilled labor had the opportunity to learn considerablythe basic knowledge relating to technical irrigation construction, Gendermainstreaming and other related issues.

- Knowledge of FWUCs members on gender aspectis limited, so they still need more helps from therelevant institutions and department on the wayhow to improve the functional FWUCs andencourages women participant in FWUCs;therefore the different needs of women and men inirrigation construction labor are not well identified.

- The lack of incentive support to their volunteerwork was often reported as the key constraint,undermining the ability to perform their active role.

- For FWUCs work is voluntary, so they are not fullyparticipated and, thus, it leads to the delayed in theactivities implementation.