Exclusion chromatography with carbon detection. A tool for further characterization of dissolved organic carbon
Post on 07-Dec-2016
Embed Size (px)
Water Research Vol. 15, pp. 457 to 462, 1981 0043-1354/81/040457-06502.00/0 Printed in Great Britain Pergamon Press Lid
EXCLUSION CHROMATOGRAPHY WITH CARBON DETECTION. A TOOL FOR FURTHER
CHARACTERIZATION OF DISSOLVED ORGANIC CARBON
R. GLOOR, H. LEIDNER, K. WUHRMAh~q and TH. FLEISCHMANN
Federal Institute for Water Resources and Water Pollution Control, Ueberlandstr. 133, CH-8600 Diibendorf-Ztirich, Switzerland
(Received September 1980)
Ahstract--A method is introduced for determining quantitatively molecular weight distributions of organic compounds in natural waters on a routine basis. Sample preparation, exclusion chromatography with either Sephadex or TSK SW (Toyo Soda, Japan) and DOC detection are discussed. The application of the method is shown with examples such as waste water treatment, ozonation of lake water and ground water infiltration.
Various techniques for determining organic water constituents have been developed. In general most research focussed on volatile organic pollutants since this fraction is more readily accessible to the analyst with sophisticated gas chromatography (GC) and mass spectroscopy (MS) techniques. It should be stressed, however, that volatile compounds constitute a very small portion of the dissolved organic carbon in natural waters (Giger & Roberts, 1978; Steelink, 1977). The bulk of organic compounds are not suffi- ciently volatile or of too high molecular weight for direct GC application. Derivatization techniques prior to GC analysis and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Armentrout et al., 1979; Pitt et al., 1976; Kasiske et al., 1978) permit more polar molecules to be detected. Carboxylic acids (Gloor & Leidner, 1976), phenols (Armentrout et al., 1979), amino acids (Kasiske et al., 1978) and carbo- hydrates (Eklund et al., 1977) are frequently deter- mined. However, a significant fraction of the organic matter still remains unidentified, including substances often referred to as aquatic humus (Gjessing, 1976), yellow acids (Ghassemi & Christman, 1968), fulvic acids (De Haan & De Boer, 1978) or by other general terms (Steelink, 1977; Swift & Posner, 1971; Davis, 1980). This last group of compounds is only operatio- nally defined. It is essential, therefore, to establish analytical methods for the further specification of dis- solved organic matter. As part of a continuing research program on this subject, we used exclusion chromatography in combination with DOC detection (Gloor & Leidner, 1979). In contrast to techniques where the analyst focuses directly on specific com- pounds or fractions, our approach consists in first fractionating all dissolved organic matter into mol- ecular weight (MW) groups and in further specifying
these fractions in a second step. This paper shows that the first step alone, the molecular weight fractionation of DOC, already opens new prospects on the behav- ior of organics in surface and ground waters.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A sample volume containing a minimum of 1.0 mg DOC was filtered through a 0.45-p.rn Millipore filter. The sample was then passed through a high capacity weak acid ion exchanger (Sephadex CM-50, Pharmacia, Sweden) in the sodium form (Baecini &Suter, 1979). The polyvalent cations in the solution were exchanged, and soluble sodium salts were formed. After evaporation to dryness (vacuum 12 mm Hg/40C) in a rotary evaporator, the residue was redissolved in a few ml of distilled water (samples may be stored in dry form). The aqueous concentrate was adjusted to a pH between 2 and 3 with dilute hydrochloric acid and gently purged with nitrogen to remove dissolved carbonic acid. Upon addition of a few mg of phosphate buffer salt (Na2HPO4, KH2PO4), the pH was adjusted to about seven. The samples were stored in sealed vials under nitro- gen to prevent any access of CO2.
DOC measurement (Unor Majhak, Germany) before and after ion exchange proved that no organic carbon was lost within the limits of accuracy of the instrument (+0.1 mg1-1 DOC). This was also true for the concen- tration step. Loss of certain volatile compounds during evaporation is negligibly small.
Exclusion chromatoc2raphy For a considerable time, we used Sephadex as a separ-
ation medium (Pharmacia, Sweden). Unfortunately, these gels require low flow velocities because they are not com- patible with pressure. In the course of our study, a new silica-based packing TSK SW (Toyo Soda, Japan) became available which overearne some difficulties met with Sephadex gels (Fukano et aL, 1978; Wehr & Abbott, 1979; Saito & Hayano, 1979). This material offers an advantage over the Sephadex packing in terms of separation speed as well as resolution, although it is more limited in capacity. Eiution patterns for our samples were found to be depen- dent on the ionic strength and pH of the eluent. This
458 R. GLOOR et al.
Sephodex G25 (900xl5mm)
(~ ' Z'O ' 4'0 ' 6'0 ' 8'0 ' K )O" '20 ' ,40min ,ml
,5oo~ 3goo o~o ~o ,2'oo Molecular weight
Fig. I. Calibration of Sepbadcx G-25 column, l ml stan- dard containing 1 mg of dextran blue and fructose. Eluent 10-2M phosphate buffer (Na2HPO4/KH2PO4), pH 7.0. Flow rate 1 ml rain -1. Detection: DOC detector; carrier
gas 9 lh- 1 attenuation 1, gain 2. Recorder: 6 cm h- 1.
TSK 2000 SW (500x7 5 mm)
,,xoo A ruc,o.
i i i i 20000 5000 500 200
Fig. 2. Calibration of TSK 2000 SW column. 200 #1 stan- dard containing 200#g of dextran blue and fructose. Eluent 10 -2 M phosphate buffer (Na2HPOJKH2PO4), pH 7.0. Flow rate 1 mlmin -t. Detection: DOC detector; carrier gas 501h -1, attenuation 1, gain 2. Recorder:
0.5 cm min- 1.
TSK 2000 SW
(500 x Z5mm)
)20000 t I '000 (200 5'000
12 /17 /79
I . , I I >20 (3130 [ IOOO ~200
I I ,20oo01 ,~oo ~ooo Molecular weight
t ,2oooo I ,&o ,'280 5 000
Fig. 3. Molecular weight distribution of DOC in Lake Grvffenst~ water (Zurich, Switzerland) at ! and 20 m depth, collected in summer and at winter time. 200 #1 of each sample injected (concentration factor
200 times). Conditions as in Fig. 2.
Exclusion chromatography with carbon detection 459
regarded both Sephadex and TSK SW, in agreement with previously published observations (Swift & Posner, 1971; Determann, 1967; Saito & Hayano, 1979; Gjessing, 1976). The two parameters were controlled by using a 10-Z-M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) as eluent (1.39 g i-1 Na2HPO4, 0.73 g 1-1 KH2PO4). The buffer reservoir was kept under nitrogen to prevent access of CO2 from the air. The Sephadex was either G-25 fine (separation range 200-5000 MW) or G-10 fine (separation range 50-700 MW). TSK-2000 SW was supplied in a packed column (7.5 x 500 ram) by Varian (Walnut Creek, CA, USA). The solvent was delivered with an Altex 110 pump (Altex, Berkeley, CA, USA). A loop injector (Rheodyne, 710, Berkeley, CA, USA) was used for introducing the samples with either a 1-ml loop (Sephadex) or a 200-#1 loop (TSK SW).
Detection and quantification The column effluent was split and an aliquot
(0:4 ml min - 1) was monitored on-line for organic carbon in a DOC detector (Gloor & Leidner, 1979). The chromato- gram represents the molecular weight distribution of all organic carbon in the sample, and the total area of the record is equal to the total DOC. If necessary, quantifi- cation of specific fractions was done by the cut and weight method of the recordings.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Calibration of the separation columns
Calibration was performed by determination of the pore volume in the columns by using Dextran blue (Pharmacia, Sweden) for excluded and fructose (meth- anol in case of Sephadex G-10) for permeated species (Figs 1 and 2). Assuming a linear relationship between log of molecular weight and elution volume, the frac- tion range can be calibrated from the gel specifica- tions supplied by the manufacturer (Sephadex, Phar- macia, Uppsala, Sweden; TSK-Gel SW type, Toyo Soda, Japan). Throughout this paper, we use the data from the dextran calibration. This method is simple and proved to be sufficiently precise for our purposes since we were interested in monitoring changes in the molecular weight distribution rather than in establish- ing the exact molecular weight of a specific species.
Five examples which are part of various projects in this Institute and represent different areas of interest shall illustrate the potentials of the method.
Example I, Lake water. Samples were collected from the highly eutrophic Lake Greifensee (Ziirich, Switzerland) at the surface and at 20 m depth (max. lake depth: 30m during times of stratification (27 August, 1979, thermocline at 7 m) and complete mixing (17 December, 1979). The molecular weight distributions (Fi& 3) of the winter samples appear very similar, demonstrating good mixing in the lake. The summer sample from 20 m depth had a molecular weight distribution similar to the two winter samples. The surface sample exhibited increased amounts of organic carbon (1) in the excluded fraction (MW > 20,000) and (2) in the molecular weight range of 500 to a few 1000. This indicates that phototrophic
Sephodex G25 (900 x l 6rrcn)
Before ozonation [~ After ozonation
i i I I ~5000 5000 100(3 500 (200
Molecu la r weioht
Fig. 4. Molecular weight distribution of DOC in Lake Greifensee water (Zurich, Switzerland) before and after ozonation on Sephadex G-25. 1 ml of co