evaluation of the cancer prevention and control research network (cpcrn) katherine m. wilson, phd,...
TRANSCRIPT
Evaluation of the Cancer Prevention and
Control Research Network (CPCRN)
Katherine M. Wilson, PhD, MPH, CHESCathy L. Melvin, PhD, MPH
The findings of this presentation are the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Today
• Show you the CPCRN logic model• Tell the story of the origin of the CPCRN• Describe how the logic model
– Was built– Will be measured– And show a page from the web-based data
entry system• Talk about the analysis and interpretation of
such data• Give you a peek at future uses of data
History
Simple desire for a mechanism in which
• Programs being used widely in the field could be evaluated
AND
• Proven interventions could be tested in multiple sites simultaneously for their effectiveness, or level of success in real-world settings.
Mission
Communities and researchersworking together
to reduce the burden of cancer, especially among those
disproportionately affected, through developing local and national
level research-practice partnership infrastructures
CPCRN Network Center Map
A. Develop and Facilitate Network Infrastructure (Workgroups, Steering Committee, and Network Meetings;
B. Policies andProcedures)Engage Outside Experts as Necessary
Inputs Organizing Activities
(Coordinating Center & Steering Committee)
NetworkActivities
NetworkOutcomes
DistalOutcomes
CPCRN Organizational Structure
Infrastructure Support
Member-Center Capacity
Coordinating Center Capacity
Affiliate Members
CDC/NCI
The Guide to Community Preventive Services
RTIPs
Cancer Control PLANET
National and Regional Health Priorities
National and Regional Health Disparities
Educate Partners About Evidence-Based Approaches to Cancer Prevention and Control
Use Promising Dissemination Strategies to Address Research Priority Areas and Specific Audiences
Research Findings Related to Evidence-Based Recommendations
Increase the Identification, Delivery, Maintenance, and Evaluation of EBIs by Partners
Increased Funding, Presentations, and Publications.
Improved Cancer Related Health Behaviors: Reduced Consumption of Tobacco Products Increased Sun Safety Improved Dietary Behavior Increased Physical
Activity
Increased Informed Decision Making for Cancer Screening and Increased Use of Effective Cancer Screening Tests
B1
A1
C1
C2
D3
D1
D2
Reports, Plans, Policies Generated with State and National Level Cancer Programs
Reduced Cancer Morbidity and Mortality
D4
F1
F2
F3
Conduct Program Evaluation, and Intervention, Replication, and Dissemination Research; Seek Funding; Submit Grant Applications and Manuscripts
C3
A B C D F
ProximalOutcomes
National, State, Community, and Local Organizations Adopt EBIs and Implement Intervention Strategies for Cancer Prevention and Control
E
E1
CONTRIBUTES TO
* EBIs = Evidence Based Interventions
A. Develop Network Vision and Priorities for Research
B. Create a Plan for Disseminating EBIs into Practice
C. Create a Process to Promote the Visibility of CPCRN, its Members, and Produtcs
D. Create Strong Processes for Collaboration
B2
CPCRN Logic Model
Performance Indicators
• The blood, sweat, and tears…
– After agreeing on framework, ad hoc group drafted performance indicators
– Took to Steering Committee for discussion and eventual approval
– Have written measures for each indicator which also have been discussed and approved by the Steering Committee.
Selected examples of performance
indicators and measures
•Column B
•Column C
•Column D
A. Develop and Facilitate Network Infrastructure (Workgroups, Steering Committee, and Network Meetings;
B. Policies andProcedures)Engage Outside Experts as Necessary
Inputs Organizing Activities
(Coordinating Center & Steering Committee)
NetworkActivities
NetworkOutcomes
DistalOutcomes
CPCRN Organizational Structure
Infrastructure Support
Member-Center Capacity
Coordinating Center Capacity
Affiliate Members
CDC/NCI
The Guide to Community Preventive Services
RTIPs
Cancer Control PLANET
National and Regional Health Priorities
National and Regional Health Disparities
Educate Partners About Evidence-Based Approaches to Cancer Prevention and Control
Use Promising Dissemination Strategies to Address Research Priority Areas and Specific Audiences
Research Findings Related to Evidence-Based Recommendations
Increase the Identification, Delivery, Maintenance, and Evaluation of EBIs by Partners
Increased Funding, Presentations, and Publications.
Improved Cancer Related Health Behaviors: Reduced Consumption of Tobacco Products Increased Sun Safety Improved Dietary Behavior Increased Physical
Activity
Increased Informed Decision Making for Cancer Screening and Increased Use of Effective Cancer Screening Tests
B1
A1
C1
C2
D3
D1
D2
Reports, Plans, Policies Generated with State and National Level Cancer Programs
Reduced Cancer Morbidity and Mortality
D4
F1
F2
F3
Conduct Program Evaluation, and Intervention, Replication, and Dissemination Research; Seek Funding; Submit Grant Applications and Manuscripts
C3
A B C D F
ProximalOutcomes
National, State, Community, and Local Organizations Adopt EBIs and Implement Intervention Strategies for Cancer Prevention and Control
E
E1
CONTRIBUTES TO
* EBIs = Evidence Based Interventions
A. Develop Network Vision and Priorities for Research
B. Create a Plan for Disseminating EBIs into Practice
C. Create a Process to Promote the Visibility of CPCRN, its Members, and Produtcs
D. Create Strong Processes for Collaboration
B2
CPCRN Logic Model
A. Develop and Facilitate Network Infrastructure (Workgroups, Steering Committee, and Network Meetings;
B. Policies andProcedures)Engage Outside Experts as Necessary
Inputs Organizing Activities
(Coordinating Center & Steering Committee)
NetworkActivities
NetworkOutcomes
DistalOutcomes
CPCRN Organizational Structure
Infrastructure Support
Member-Center Capacity
Coordinating Center Capacity
Affiliate Members
CDC/NCI
The Guide to Community Preventive Services
RTIPs
Cancer Control PLANET
National and Regional Health Priorities
National and Regional Health Disparities
Educate Partners About Evidence-Based Approaches to Cancer Prevention and Control
Use Promising Dissemination Strategies to Address Research Priority Areas and Specific Audiences
Research Findings Related to Evidence-Based Recommendations
Increase the Identification, Delivery, Maintenance, and Evaluation of EBIs by Partners
Increased Funding, Presentations, and Publications.
Improved Cancer Related Health Behaviors: Reduced Consumption of Tobacco Products Increased Sun Safety Improved Dietary Behavior Increased Physical
Activity
Increased Informed Decision Making for Cancer Screening and Increased Use of Effective Cancer Screening Tests
B1
A1
C1
C2
D3
D1
D2
Reports, Plans, Policies Generated with State and National Level Cancer Programs
Reduced Cancer Morbidity and Mortality
D4
F1
F2
F3
Conduct Program Evaluation, and Intervention, Replication, and Dissemination Research; Seek Funding; Submit Grant Applications and Manuscripts
C3
A B C D F
ProximalOutcomes
National, State, Community, and Local Organizations Adopt EBIs and Implement Intervention Strategies for Cancer Prevention and Control
E
E1
CONTRIBUTES TO
* EBIs = Evidence Based Interventions
A. Develop Network Vision and Priorities for Research
B. Create a Plan for Disseminating EBIs into Practice
C. Create a Process to Promote the Visibility of CPCRN, its Members, and Produtcs
D. Create Strong Processes for Collaboration
B2
CPCRN Logic Model
A. Develop and Facilitate Network Infrastructure (Workgroups, Steering Committee, and Network Meetings;
B. Policies andProcedures)Engage Outside Experts as Necessary
Inputs Organizing Activities
(Coordinating Center & Steering Committee)
NetworkActivities
NetworkOutcomes
DistalOutcomes
CPCRN Organizational Structure
Infrastructure Support
Member-Center Capacity
Coordinating Center Capacity
Affiliate Members
CDC/NCI
The Guide to Community Preventive Services
RTIPs
Cancer Control PLANET
National and Regional Health Priorities
National and Regional Health Disparities
Educate Partners About Evidence-Based Approaches to Cancer Prevention and Control
Use Promising Dissemination Strategies to Address Research Priority Areas and Specific Audiences
Research Findings Related to Evidence-Based Recommendations
Increase the Identification, Delivery, Maintenance, and Evaluation of EBIs by Partners
Increased Funding, Presentations, and Publications.
Improved Cancer Related Health Behaviors: Reduced Consumption of Tobacco Products Increased Sun Safety Improved Dietary Behavior Increased Physical
Activity
Increased Informed Decision Making for Cancer Screening and Increased Use of Effective Cancer Screening Tests
B1
A1
C1
C2
D3
D1
D2
Reports, Plans, Policies Generated with State and National Level Cancer Programs
Reduced Cancer Morbidity and Mortality
D4
F1
F2
F3
Conduct Program Evaluation, and Intervention, Replication, and Dissemination Research; Seek Funding; Submit Grant Applications and Manuscripts
C3
A B C D F
ProximalOutcomes
National, State, Community, and Local Organizations Adopt EBIs and Implement Intervention Strategies for Cancer Prevention and Control
E
E1
CONTRIBUTES TO
* EBIs = Evidence Based Interventions
A. Develop Network Vision and Priorities for Research
B. Create a Plan for Disseminating EBIs into Practice
C. Create a Process to Promote the Visibility of CPCRN, its Members, and Produtcs
D. Create Strong Processes for Collaboration
B2
CPCRN Logic Model
How we will capture these?
What will these mean?
• Going from measurement to analysis
• Examples
– Column B,– processes of collaboration• We want to see a movement from simple
information sharing to collaboration
– Column C, – co-authored manuscripts and grant applications
• We want to see fewer single author, single institution manuscripts and grant appications
What will these indicators tell us?
Examples of ways to measure movement from simple information sharing (networking) to collaboration
• Column B – processes of collaboration
• Column C – co-authored manuscripts and grant applications.
C3
B4
A peek into future uses for these data and the
logic model
• Funding, funding, funding…
• Justifying another five-year cycle for the Network, perhaps with even more centers funded.
• Contribute to the literature on collaboration and infrastructure needed for successful multi-center research.