evaluating and assessing ebooks: the academic library perspective

15
Evaluating & assessing ebooks: the academic library perspective Canadian Library Association, May 29, 2013 Pamela Jacobs, University of Guelph [email protected] @pamelajacobs

Upload: pamela-jacobs

Post on 06-May-2015

128 views

Category:

Education


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Presented at the Canadian Library Association Collections Preconference in Winnipeg, MB on May 29, 2013.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evaluating and assessing ebooks: the academic library perspective

Evaluating & assessing ebooks: the academic library

perspective

Canadian Library Association, May 29, 2013Pamela Jacobs, University of Guelph

[email protected]@pamelajacobs

Page 2: Evaluating and assessing ebooks: the academic library perspective

https://twitter.com/serialsolutions/status/186911288247586816/photo/1

Page 3: Evaluating and assessing ebooks: the academic library perspective

Why ebooks?

• Declining use of print books• Increased pressure for user space • Popularity of online content

Page 4: Evaluating and assessing ebooks: the academic library perspective

4

• 55% of books published since 1990 have never circulated

• 10.7% of the books in circulation on a given day were checked out to undergraduate students (34% to graduate students, 23.6% to faculty)

http://staffweb.library.cornell.edu/system/files/CollectionUsageTF_ReportFinal11-22-10.pdf

Page 5: Evaluating and assessing ebooks: the academic library perspective

5

http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/library/2011/2011-06.pdf

“80% of the circulation is driven by just 6% of the collection”

Page 6: Evaluating and assessing ebooks: the academic library perspective

How do we measure use of a book?

© Kristen M.

Page 7: Evaluating and assessing ebooks: the academic library perspective

Standardized Usage Reports• COUNTER Book Report 2: Number of

Successful Section Requests by Month and Title

• Multiple platforms

Page 8: Evaluating and assessing ebooks: the academic library perspective

…or not?

Karin Bystrom, 2012. Everything that’s wrong with e-book statistics. Poster session, Charleston Conference.

Page 9: Evaluating and assessing ebooks: the academic library perspective

Turnaways• COUNTER Book Report 3: Turnaways by month

and title• Level of access will affect level of use

Page 10: Evaluating and assessing ebooks: the academic library perspective

Comparing to print

• Apples and oranges

• But…– Newer stuff gets more use– Course-related materials get more use– 80/20 ish rule still applies

Page 11: Evaluating and assessing ebooks: the academic library perspective

Cost and Cost/Use

• As compared to print• Packages vs. individual titles• Aggregators vs. publishers• Patron and demand-driven models• Subscription vs. purchase vs. lending models• Workflow costs

Page 12: Evaluating and assessing ebooks: the academic library perspective

Evaluating Patron Driven models – Royal Holloway, University of London

• EBL – purchase and short term loan model• ₤10,000 available

– 37 titles purchased = ₤270/title

– 900 titles purchased or loaned = ₤11.11/title

– 1500 titles viewed = ₤6.50/title

http://ebookchallenge.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/patron-driven_e-books_RHUL_Anna_Grigson_Sept2012.pdf

Page 13: Evaluating and assessing ebooks: the academic library perspective

ARL LibVALUE ebook study

• Low cost/title 2012 $19.29• Low cost/use* 2012 $1.38

• Elsevier user survey– 24/7 access– Easy to search and navigate– Download to laptop

http://www.libqual.org/documents/LibQual/publications/2013/libvalue-assessing-the-value-of-ebooks.pdf

Page 14: Evaluating and assessing ebooks: the academic library perspective

Complicating Factors

• User experience– Platform issues/preferences– Problem of defining exactly what is an e-book– Textbooks vs. reference vs. scholarly monographs– Course readings and e-reserves

• Discoverability– MARC records availability and quality– Semantic linking– Library catalogue as main access point

Page 15: Evaluating and assessing ebooks: the academic library perspective

Thank you for listening…

…questions?

[email protected]