educators evaluating quality instructional products (equip) using the tri-state quality rubric

Download Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products (EQuIP) Using the Tri-State Quality Rubric

Post on 17-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents

0 download

Embed Size (px)

TRANSCRIPT

  • Slide 1
  • Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products (EQuIP) Using the Tri-State Quality Rubric
  • Slide 2
  • Development of the Tri-State Rubric Work began by Tri-State Collaborative Comprised of educational leaders from Massachusetts, New York, and Rhode Island Developed criterion-based rubrics and review process Assisted by Achieve Launched by PARCC in June 2012
  • Slide 3
  • Arkansas EQuIP Team ELA/Literacy Nancy Papacek Bryant Andrea McKenna Springdale Vernita Lee Dumas Mathematics Janice Riggs El Dorado Felix Maull Conway Teresa Martin Hamburg
  • Slide 4
  • Why EQuIP and the Tri-State Rubric Determine quality of existing instructional materials or those under development Place quality model lessons/units into the hands of the teachers Build capacity of educators at the classroom, building, district, and state levels to determine quality and alignment
  • Slide 5
  • An Aligned System Common Core State Standards Model Content Frameworks Model Lessons/Units PARCC Assessment
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • State Initiatives Mathematics Design Collaborative (MDC) Literacy Design Collaborative (LDC) Cognitively Guided Instruction (CGI) Understanding By Design (UBD)
  • Slide 9
  • Tri-State Rubric Purposes Provides clear, descriptive criteria for CCSS lessons/units Provides meaningful, constructive feedback to developers of lessons/units, based on common criteria Identifies lessons/units that can serve as models Guides collegial review and jurying processes
  • Slide 10
  • Tri-State Rubric Evaluates Lessons that include instructional activities and assessments aligned to the CCSS that may extend over a few class periods or days Units that include integrated and focused lessons aligned to the CCSS that extend over a longer period of time NOT designed to evaluate a single task
  • Slide 11
  • Evaluating vs. Writing The Tri-State Rubric can be used to evaluate lessons/units that have already been developed. New lessons/units could be developed with the rubric in mind.
  • Slide 12
  • Organization of Rubric Criteria Dimension I Alignment to the Rigor of the CCSS Dimension II Key Areas of Focus in the CCSS Dimension III Instructional Supports Dimension IV Assessments
  • Slide 13
  • Tri-State Rubric Formats One-Page Format Contains dimensions, criteria, and ratings Two-Page Format Used during review process and includes columns for observations, comments, and suggestions New Long Format Intended to be completed electronically
  • Slide 14
  • 14 The Rubric Organizes Criteria That Describe Quality Lessons/Units Criteria that define the rubric are organized to describe quality in four dimensions. **The most critical criteria are considered to be must haves for a quality CCSS lesson/unit.
  • Slide 15
  • Two-Page Format Is Used to Check Criteria, Rate, and Provide Feedback: Page 1 - Dimensions I, II, and Rating Descriptors
  • Slide 16
  • Two-Page Format Is Used to Check Criteria, Rate, and Provide Feedback: Page 2 - Dimensions III, IV, and Summary Comments
  • Slide 17
  • Tri-State Rubric Criteria Descriptive criteria in each Dimension Represent a high standard of quality Describe characteristics found in an exemplary CCSS lesson/unit Critical criteria designated with double asterisk (**) Located In Dimensions I & II Must be checked to be exemplary
  • Slide 18
  • Tri-State Rubric Checked Criteria A criterion is checked when lesson/unit contains clear, substantial evidence of the criterions descriptor. Many in progress lessons/units, while representing good instruction, may not be deemed to currently meet the standard. Pattern of checks in a column represent both strengths and areas for improvement
  • Slide 19
  • Tri-State Rubric Initial Review Process Initial review should focus on Identifying criteria that are met Providing feedback on improvements needed Initial review should not focus on Assigning ratings
  • Slide 20
  • Tri-State Rubric Review Process Step 1: Record grade and title Step 2: Scan lesson/unit for content and organization and skim key materials, particularly those related to the Dimensions Step 3: Compare targeted grade-level standards for alignment to the CCSS
  • Slide 21
  • Tri-State Rubric Review Process Step 4: In ELA, study and measure the text(s) that serves as the centerpiece for the lesson/unit, analyzing text complexity, quality, scope, and relationship to instruction. In mathematics, work the student tasks provided, keeping in mind all possible strategies students might use.
  • Slide 22
  • Tri-State Rubric Review Process Step 5: Analyze lesson/unit for evidence of Dimension I Alignment to the Rigor of the CCSS Step 6: Check criteria in Column 1 for which there is clear and substantial evidence of meeting the descriptors and provide input on specific improvements for unchecked criterion
  • Slide 23
  • Tri-State Rubric Review Process Step 7: Reference criteria when making observations and recommendations in the column next to the Dimension Repeat Steps 5-7 for each Dimension, examining evidence presented in the lesson/unit through the lens of each criterion.
  • Slide 24
  • Evaluating a Lesson or Unit In each Dimension Examine dimension through lens of the criteria Check criteria that are met Provide input on improvements needed to meet the criteria Examine pattern of checks and use criteria to determine a 3-2-1 rating
  • Slide 25
  • Evaluating a Lesson or Unit Descriptors for the 3-2-1 rating scale 3: Meets all must have criteria (**) in dimensions I, II and most of the criteria in III, IV. 2: Meets many of the must have criteria in dimensions I, II and many of the criteria in III, IV. 1: Meets some of the criteria in the dimension. 0: Does not meet the criteria in the dimension.
  • Slide 26
  • Evaluating a Lesson or Unit Circle the rating at the bottom of the Dimensions column Make constructive comments/recommendations that explain the rating and indicate how to improve the lesson/unit for that Dimension.
  • Slide 27
  • Determining an Overall Rating Review the patterns of check criteria and ratings for each of the for Dimensions. Make a summary judgment about the overall quality of the lesson/unit, using the Overall Rating Scale. Record the Overall Rating on the top right of the Tri-State Rubric.
  • Slide 28
  • Final Thoughts The common descriptive criteria provide a common language for constructive comments, discussions, and evaluations. The pattern of checked criteria real the perceived strengths and areas for improvement in each dimension. The four dimensional ratings reveal the current status of the lesson/unit as a model of CCSS instruction within each dimension. The overall rating indicates whether the lesson/unit has been deemed a CCSS model, or where it is in the process of becoming a model example.
  • Slide 29
  • Slides developed by and used with permission from the Tri-State Quality Rubric Project: Achieve www.achieve.org 1400 16th Street, NW / Suite 510 Washington, DC 20036

Recommended

View more >