educators evaluating quality instructional products ( equip )

29
Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products (EQuIP) Using the Tri-State Quality Rubric

Upload: shen

Post on 08-Feb-2016

38 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products ( EQuIP ). Using the Tri-State Quality Rubric. Development of the Tri-State Rubric. Work began by Tri-State Collaborative Comprised of educational leaders from Massachusetts, New York, and Rhode Island - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products  ( EQuIP )

Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products

(EQuIP)

Using the Tri-State Quality Rubric

Page 2: Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products  ( EQuIP )

Development of the Tri-State Rubric Work began by Tri-State Collaborative Comprised of educational leaders

from Massachusetts, New York, and Rhode Island

Developed criterion-based rubrics and review process

Assisted by Achieve Launched by PARCC in June 2012

Page 3: Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products  ( EQuIP )

Arkansas EQuIP TeamELA/Literacy

• Nancy PapacekBryant

• Andrea McKennaSpringdale

• Vernita LeeDumas

Mathematics• Janice Riggs

El Dorado

• Felix MaullConway

• Teresa MartinHamburg

Page 4: Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products  ( EQuIP )

Why EQuIP and the Tri-State Rubric Determine quality of existing instructional

materials or those under development Place quality model lessons/units into the

hands of the teachers Build capacity of educators at the classroom,

building, district, and state levels to determine quality and alignment

Page 5: Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products  ( EQuIP )

An Aligned SystemCommon Core State Standards

Model Content Frameworks

Model Lessons/Units

PARCC Assessment

Page 6: Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products  ( EQuIP )
Page 7: Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products  ( EQuIP )
Page 8: Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products  ( EQuIP )

State Initiatives Mathematics Design Collaborative (MDC)

Literacy Design Collaborative (LDC)

Cognitively Guided Instruction (CGI)

Understanding By Design (UBD)

Page 9: Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products  ( EQuIP )

Tri-State Rubric Purposes Provides clear, descriptive criteria for

CCSS lessons/units Provides meaningful, constructive

feedback to developers of lessons/units, based on common criteria

Identifies lessons/units that can serve as models

Guides collegial review and jurying processes

Page 10: Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products  ( EQuIP )

Tri-State Rubric Evaluates Lessons that include instructional

activities and assessments aligned to the CCSS that may extend over a few class periods or days

Units that include integrated and focused lessons aligned to the CCSS that extend over a longer period of time

NOT designed to evaluate a single task

Page 11: Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products  ( EQuIP )

Evaluating vs. Writing The Tri-State Rubric can be used to

evaluate lessons/units that have already been developed.

New lessons/units could be developed with the rubric in mind.

Page 12: Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products  ( EQuIP )

Organization of Rubric CriteriaDimension IAlignment to the Rigor of the CCSSDimension IIKey Areas of Focus in the CCSSDimension IIIInstructional SupportsDimension IVAssessments

Page 13: Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products  ( EQuIP )

Tri-State Rubric FormatsOne-Page FormatContains dimensions, criteria, and ratingsTwo-Page FormatUsed during review process and includes columns for observations, comments, and suggestionsNew Long FormatIntended to be completed electronically

Page 14: Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products  ( EQuIP )

14

The Rubric Organizes Criteria That Describe Quality Lessons/Units

Criteria that define the rubric are organized to describe quality in four dimensions.

**The most critical criteria are considered to be “must have’s” for a quality CCSS lesson/unit.

Page 15: Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products  ( EQuIP )

Two-Page Format Is Used to Check Criteria, Rate, and Provide Feedback: Page 1 - Dimensions I, II, and Rating Descriptors

Page 16: Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products  ( EQuIP )

Two-Page Format Is Used to Check Criteria, Rate, and Provide Feedback: Page 2 - Dimensions III, IV, and Summary Comments

Page 17: Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products  ( EQuIP )

Tri-State Rubric CriteriaDescriptive criteria in each Dimension

Represent a high standard of quality

Describe characteristics found in an exemplary CCSS lesson/unit

Critical criteria designated with double asterisk (**)

Located In Dimensions I & II Must be checked to be exemplary

Page 18: Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products  ( EQuIP )

Tri-State Rubric Checked Criteria A criterion is checked when

lesson/unit contains clear, substantial evidence of the criterion’s descriptor.

Many “in progress” lessons/units, while representing good instruction, may not be deemed to currently meet the standard.

Pattern of checks in a column represent both strengths and areas for improvement

Page 19: Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products  ( EQuIP )

Tri-State Rubric Initial Review ProcessInitial review should focus on

Identifying criteria that are met Providing feedback on

improvements needed

Initial review should not focus on Assigning ratings

Page 20: Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products  ( EQuIP )

Tri-State Rubric Review ProcessStep 1: Record grade and title

Step 2: Scan lesson/unit for content and organization and skim key materials, particularly those related to the Dimensions

Step 3: Compare targeted grade-level standards for alignment to the CCSS

Page 21: Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products  ( EQuIP )

Tri-State Rubric Review ProcessStep 4:In ELA, study and measure the text(s) that serves as the centerpiece for the lesson/unit, analyzing text complexity, quality, scope, and relationship to instruction.In mathematics, work the student tasks provided, keeping in mind all possible strategies students might use.

Page 22: Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products  ( EQuIP )

Tri-State Rubric Review ProcessStep 5: Analyze lesson/unit for evidence of Dimension I Alignment to the Rigor of the CCSS

Step 6: Check criteria in Column 1 for which there is clear and substantial evidence of meeting the descriptors and provide input on specific improvements for unchecked criterion

Page 23: Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products  ( EQuIP )

Tri-State Rubric Review ProcessStep 7: Reference criteria when making observations and recommendations in the column next to the Dimension

Repeat Steps 5-7 for each Dimension, examining evidence presented in the lesson/unit through the “lens” of each criterion.

Page 24: Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products  ( EQuIP )

Evaluating a Lesson or UnitIn each DimensionExamine dimension through “lens” of the criteriaCheck criteria that are metProvide input on improvements needed to meet the criteriaExamine pattern of checks and use criteria to determine a 3-2-1 rating

Page 25: Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products  ( EQuIP )

Evaluating a Lesson or UnitDescriptors for the 3-2-1 rating scale3: Meets all ”must have” criteria (**) in dimensions I, II and most of the criteria in III, IV.2: Meets many of the “must have” criteria in dimensions I, II and many of the criteria in III, IV.1: Meets some of the criteria in the dimension.0: Does not meet the criteria in the dimension.

Page 26: Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products  ( EQuIP )

Evaluating a Lesson or Unit Circle the rating at the bottom of the

Dimension’s column Make constructive

comments/recommendations that explain the rating and indicate how to improve the lesson/unit for that Dimension.

Page 27: Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products  ( EQuIP )

Determining an Overall Rating Review the patterns of check criteria

and ratings for each of the for Dimensions.

Make a summary judgment about the overall quality of the lesson/unit, using the Overall Rating Scale.

Record the Overall Rating on the top right of the Tri-State Rubric.

Page 28: Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products  ( EQuIP )

Final Thoughts The common descriptive criteria provide a common

language for constructive comments, discussions, and evaluations.

The pattern of checked criteria real the perceived strengths and areas for improvement in each dimension.

The four dimensional ratings reveal the current status of the lesson/unit as a model of CCSS instruction within each dimension.

The overall rating indicates whether the lesson/unit has been deemed a CCSS model, or where it is in the process of becoming a model example.

Page 29: Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products  ( EQuIP )

Slides developed by and used with permission from the Tri-State Quality Rubric Project:

Achievewww.achieve.org1400 16th Street, NW / Suite 510 Washington, DC 20036