tri-state quality review rubric

34
English Language Arts Common Core Lesson Alignment NCAGT/PAGE Conference March 1, 2013 Lisa L. McIntosh

Upload: aldis

Post on 24-Feb-2016

41 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

English Language Arts Common Core Lesson Alignment NCAGT/PAGE Conference March 1, 2013 Lisa L. McIntosh. Tri-State Quality Review Rubric. Materials. Go to our Resources LiveBinder at: http://www.livebinders.com/play/play/297779 Click on the tab, Quality Review Rubric - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

English Language Arts Common Core

Lesson Alignment

NCAGT/PAGE ConferenceMarch 1, 2013

Lisa L. McIntosh

Page 2: Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

Page 3: Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

Materials

Go to our Resources LiveBinder at: http://www.livebinders.com/play/play/297779

Click on the tab, Quality Review Rubric

Open a copy of the ELA 3-12 Quality Review Rubric

Page 4: Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

What is the Quality Review Rubric?

1. It is a rubric used to evaluate lessons that include instructional activities and assessments aligned to the CCSS that may extend over a few class periods or days AND to evaluate units that include integrated and focused lessons aligned to the CCSS that extend over a longer period of time.

2. The primary purpose of the Quality Review process is to provide specific input for the improvement of instructional materials so that teaching and learning are aligned with the CCSS.

Note: The Tri-State Rubrics and DPI do not require a specific template for lesson or unit design. The Rubrics are not designed to evaluate a single task.

Page 5: Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

Four dimensions:

I. Alignment to the rigors of the CCSS

II. Key areas of focus in the CCSS (the “shifts”)

III. Instructional Supports

IV.Assessment

Page 6: Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

I. Alignment to the rigors of the CCSSThe lesson/unit aligns with the letter and spirit of the CCSS: Targets a set of grade-level ELA/Literacy CCSS for teaching and learning. **

Includes a clear and explicit purpose for instruction.

Selects texts that measure within the grade-level text complexity band and and are of sufficient quality and scope for the stated purpose.** (i.e., present vocabulary, syntax, text structures, levels of meaning/purpose, and other qualitative characteristics similar to CCSS grade-level exemplars in Appendices A & B)

In addition, for units: Integrates reading, writing, speaking and listening so that students apply and

synthesize advancing literacy skills.

(Grades 3-5) Builds students’ content knowledge and their understanding of reading and writing in social studies, the arts, science or technical subjects through the coherent selection of texts. [NOTE: Disciplinary rubrics for grades 6-12 are under development.]

Page 7: Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

Alignment to the Standards

The Standard(s) selected are clearly evident and explicitly taught in the lesson.

Make sure the entire Standard is addressed.

Page 8: Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

Language

Reading

Speaking and

Listening

Writing

Integration of Standards

Standards from each Strand may be addressed in a lesson or unit.

Page 9: Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

Text Complexity In the CCSS, text is the

focus of instruction.

All students should have extensive opportunities to encounter grade-level complex texts.

Shorter challenging texts that elicit close reading and rereading should be a part of regular instruction.

Page 10: Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

II. Key areas of focus in the CCSS

The lesson/unit addresses key areas of focus in the CCSS:

Reading Text Closely: Makes reading text(s) closely, examining textual evidence, and discerning deep meaning a central focus of instruction. **

Text-Based Evidence: Facilitates rich and rigorous evidence-based discussions and writing about common texts through a sequence of specific, thought-provoking, and text-dependent questions (including, when applicable, illustrations, charts, diagrams, audio/video, and media).**

Writing from Sources: Routinely expects that students draw evidence from texts to produce clear and coherent writing that informs, explains, or makes an argument in various written forms (notes, summaries, short responses, or formal essays).**

Academic Vocabulary: Focuses on building students’ academic vocabulary in context throughout instruction.

Page 11: Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

In addition, for units: Increasing Text Complexity: Focuses students on the close reading of a

progression of complex texts drawn from the grade-level band. Provides text-centered learning that is sequenced, scaffolded, and supported to advance students toward independent reading of complex texts at the CCR level.

Balance of Texts: Includes a balance of informational and literary texts as stipulated in the CCSS [p.5] and indicated by instructional time (may be more applicable across a year).

Building Disciplinary Knowledge: Provides opportunities for students to build knowledge about a topic or subject through analysis of a coherent selection of strategically sequenced, discipline-specific texts.

Balance of Writing: Includes a balance of on-demand and process writing (e.g. multiple drafts and revisions over time) and short, focused research projects, incorporating digital texts where appropriate.

Page 12: Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

Close Reading

Teachers provide students with multiple opportunities to read rich texts.

Page 13: Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

Text-Based Evidence

Teachers facilitate learning that stays deeply connected to the text.

Students develop the ability to make arguments based on evidence found in the text.

Page 14: Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

Text-Dependent Questions

Teachers facilitate evidence-based discussions using text-dependent questions.

Text-dependent questions can serve to scaffold learning.

Page 15: Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

Writing From Sources

Students are asked to make a claim and use evidence from the text in their writing.

Page 16: Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

Academic Vocabulary

Focus vocabulary instruction on Tier 2 words in context.

Page 17: Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

Balance of Informational and Literary Texts

In elementary grades, the CCSS call for a balance of literary and informational texts.

In ELA classes 6-12, there should be a blend of literature (fiction, poetry, and drama) and literary nonfiction

Page 18: Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

III. Instructional SupportsThe lesson/unit is responsive to varied student learning needs: Cultivates student interest and engagement in reading, writing, and speaking

about texts.

Addresses instructional expectations and is easy to understand and use.

Provides all students with multiple opportunities to engage with text of appropriate complexity for the grade level; includes appropriate scaffolding so that students directly experience the complexity of the text.

Focuses on challenging sections of text(s) and engages students in a productive struggle through discussion questions and other supports that build toward independence.

Integrates appropriate supports for students who are ELL, have disabilities, or read well below the grade level text band.

Provides extensions and/or more advanced text for students who read well above the grade level text band.

Page 19: Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

In addition, for units: Includes a progression of learning where concepts and/or skills advance and

deepen over time.

Gradually removes supports, requiring students to demonstrate their independent capacities.

Provides for authentic learning, application of literacy skills, student-directed inquiry, analysis, evaluation, and/or reflection.

Integrates targeted instruction in such areas as grammar and conventions, writing strategies, discussion rules, and all aspects of foundational reading for grades 3-5.

Includes regular independent reading based on student choice and interest to build stamina, confidence, and motivation; indicates how students are accountable for that reading.

Uses technology and media to deepen learning and draw attention to evidence and texts as appropriate.

Page 20: Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

Engagement and Differentiation

Lessons include instructional strategies and supports to engage ALL students in the content being studied. (ELL, EC, AIG)

Expectations are clearly communicated to students.

Page 21: Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

Students are provided with opportunities to engage in a “productive struggle” with challenging sections of text.

Page 22: Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

IV. Assessment

The lesson/unit regularly assesses whether students are mastering standards-based content:

Elicits direct, observable evidence of the degree to which a student can independently demonstrate the major targeted grade level CCSS standards with appropriately complex text(s).

Assesses student proficiency using methods that are unbiased and accessible to all students.

Includes aligned rubrics or assessment guidelines that provide sufficient guidance for interpreting student performance.

In addition, for units:

Uses varied modes of assessment, including a range of pre, formative, summative, and self-assessment measures.

Page 23: Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

Use these steps to complete your rubric:

1. Record the grade and title

2. Scan the lesson

3. Identify the grade-level standards

4. Study and measure the text(s) used in the lesson

5. Analyze the lesson for evidence of the dimensions

6. Check the box for each criteria met or make suggestions for improvements

Page 24: Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

Where Do I Go When My Lessons Are Not Aligned?

Page 25: Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

Remember….

The purpose of the rubric is to: Align lessons and units to the CCSS

Evaluate lessons and instructional resources

Serve as a guide to develop new lessons

Page 26: Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

Differentiating for Gifted Learners in the ELA Common Core

• Focus on the skills of argument.

• Provide lessons that integrate the ELA Standards of reading, writing, speaking and listening, and language as well as standards of other disciplines.

• Adjust texts so that students are reading texts that are slightly above their documented reading level – (text complexity).

• Promote students’ development of research skills, Standards 7, 8, and 9 in the ELA Common Core.

Page 27: Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

Lesson Examples for Gifted LearnersElementary:

Kindergarten: Evaluation of Book Characters: Who Would You Want to Be? • Writing opinion pieces• Strengthening writing with guidance and support

Grade 2: Debating Current Issues - Banning Junk Food at School• Debating• Using evidence from the text • Comparing two or more texts on the same topic• Real life situation – authentic

Grade 3 : Growing up Batty: Bats & Humans – Are we that different?• Staying in the text, but going deeper • Finding evidence from the text.

Page 28: Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

Lesson Examples for Gifted LearnersMiddle:

Grade 7: “The Star Spangled Banner”, 200 years later

• Writing arguments• Integrating standards (Reading, Speaking and Listening, Writing)• Using Socratic Seminar• Higher-level questioning• Using the standards as the criteria for the writing assessment

Page 29: Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

High School:

Honors English 10: “Using Rhetoric to Make Public Addresses”• Writing arguments• Research

English III: “Analyzing Structure in T.S. Eliot’s The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock”• Integrating standards• Text-dependent questions

Page 30: Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

http://rt3nc.org/objects/standards/cclitmap/ela.html

Page 31: Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

Evidence

Let’s find evidence in the standards!

color codingClick evidence to see where it occurs

in the standards.

Page 33: Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

Empowerment in implementation means knowing what to keep and what to let go. Shoulders can quickly get heavy in education. It can feel like every new idea is added to the heap of “everything to accomplish in a single day.” In order to implement the Core with success we’ll not only need to make sense of what it is, but we’ll also need to empower ourselves to determine what we let go of. Whether we decide to let go of a textbook we’ve always taught from in favor of a primary text or to keep the narrative piece of writing that sparks creativity in our students, we must remember that when our choices are purposeful we’ll find ways to intersect the Common Core Standards with the integrity of our classrooms.

-Sarah Wessling's Top Ten Common Core Insider Secrets

Page 34: Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

Julie Joslin, Ed.D. Section LeadGrades 9-12 English Language Arts [email protected]

Lisa McIntosh, MSAK-5 English Language Arts [email protected]

Contact Information: