1
ADELAIDE INSTITUTE PO Box 3300 Norwood SA 5067 Online
Australia ISSN 1440-9828
Mob: 61+401692057
Email: [email protected]
Web: http://www.adelaideinstitute.org
September 2019 No 1067
_______________________________________________________________
********SPRING HAS SPRUNG********
The Solitary Reaper - William Wordsworth Behold her, single in the field,
Yon solitary Highland Lass! Reaping and singing by herself;
Stop here, or gently pass!
Alone she cuts and binds the grain, And sings a melancholy strain; O listen! for the Vale profound Is overflowing with the sound.
No Nightingale did ever chaunt
More welcome notes to weary bands
Of travellers in some shady haunt, Among Arabian sands:
A voice so thrilling ne'er was heard
In spring-time from the Cuckoo-bird, Breaking the silence of the seas
Among the farthest Hebrides.
Will no one tell me what she sings?— Perhaps the plaintive numbers flow
For old, unhappy, far-off things, And battles long ago:
Or is it some more humble lay, Familiar matter of to-day?
Some natural sorrow, loss, or pain, That has been, and may be again?
Whate'er the theme, the Maiden sang As if her song could have no ending;
I saw her singing at her work, And o'er the sickle bending;—
I listen'd, motionless and still; And, as I mounted up the hill,
The music in my heart I bore, Long after it was heard no more.
------------------------------------------------------- William Wordsworth, 7 April 1770-23 April 1850, who rallied for "common speech" within poems and argued against the poetic biases of the period, wrote some of the most influential poetry in Western literature, including his most famous work, The Prelude, which is often considered to be the crowning achievement of English romanticism.
* https://poets.org/poem/solitary-reaper
________________________________________________ Innate = racism: German scientists want to banish the word 'race' on political grounds
UBER = like the Cukoo Bird: trickery, mimicry - thief - liar – killer -
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ UBER = Uber Technologies, Inc. is an American multinational transportation network company offering services that include peer-to-peer ridesharing, ride service hailing, food delivery, and a bicycle-sharing system. The company is based in San Francisco and has operations in over 785 metropolitan areas
worldwide.
***************** CUCKOO BIRD: KILLER - THIEF – LIAR – TRICKERY – MIMICRY: The common cuckoo does not make a nest of its own, and they do not bring up their own young. Instead, the female lays her eggs in the nests of other birds. Each female cuckoo specialises in just one host species, and lays camouflaged eggs in that bird's nest. … Within a species the calls are remarkably consistent across the range, even in species with very large ranges. This suggests, along with the fact that many species are not raised by their true parents, that the calls of
cuckoos are innate and not learnt. ********
ÜBER ALLES = Above All = First me/family/nation = Australia First/ America First ********
DEUTSCHLAND, DEUTSCHLAND ÜBER ALLES, ÜBER ALLES IN DER WELT Germany, Germany above all, above all in the world -
FAMILY – PATRIOTISM – NATIONALISM *https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIff7EB7pvc
___________________________________________________
2
The end of white America
and Israel lobby
Sept 7, 2019 02:09PM
The end of white America is now
assured. The only question
is the fate of the remnants.
The lack of response by white Americans to their demonization as they decline as a percent of the population demonstrates their lack of concern with their fate.
By Dr Paul Craig Roberts
It seems as if the West is dead in every way. The rule of law is dead throughout the West. Democracy is a scam. There is oligarchic rule. Everything is done for organized interest groups. Nothing is done for the people. Putin just declared: “West’s leading role is ending.” How right
he is.
The Brookings Institution is not a racist white supremacist outfit. It is a neoliberal/neoconservative “think tank.” One of its members, William H. Frey, has authored a report, “Less than Half of US Children Under 15 Are White, Census Shows,” based on the recently released 2018 US Census Bureau report. The information
in Frey’s article is fascinating. It shows a disappearing white population.
The number of white children, that is, the group of the next generation of parents, is not only declining relative to the populations of non-whites but also absolutely. During 2010-2018 the number of white children shrank
by 2.2 million. Overall, the white population of America has declined from 80 percent of the US population in
1980 to 60 percent in 2018.
The American middle class, which is largely white, bears the brunt of income taxation which means that white Americans bear the brunt of the cost of the welfare support systems. The white middle class also bears the
brunt through property taxes of the public school systems. Many middle class members pay again in private school tuition for the education of their children in safer and more ordered environments. The cost of university education is exorbitant. All of these costs are rising faster than middle class incomes, and this limits white procreation.
The decline of people of European descent as a percentage of the US population can only accelerate as the child-bearing ability of the white population
evaporates. The median age of Americans of European descent is 43.6 years. The median age of Hispanics is 29.5 years, and the median age of multiracial residents
of the US is 20.7 years. Over the past seven years, Americans of European descent experienced an excess of deaths over births.
Frey concludes his article:
“These demographic trends make plain that, as racially diverse younger generations become part of the labor force, tax base, and consumer base, the nation will need
to balance these groups’ distinct interests and needs in areas such as education, family services, and affordable housing with the health and social support requirements
of a large and faster growing older population that will be entering its post retirement years. Indeed, the youthful
‘minority white’ tipping point shown in the new census statistics needs to be duly noted. It has important implications for America’s future.”
This is the question that Frey quietly raises: “In Identity Politics America, where white people are demonized as victimizers and everyone else receives sympathy as their victims, where the Mexican-American head of New York
City public schools has announced his campaign to remove ‘toxic white values’ from the school curriculum, where the New York Times has committed to ‘reframing’ the United States as a racist white slave state, will the new majority composed of white people’s victims consent to giving up resources to provide Social Security and Medicare for people they have been brought up to
believe victimized them?”
The chances of such support are further negated by the diminishing numbers of the white voting population and by the decline of the US economy that is forcing the US
labor force into lowly paid domestic service jobs which are themselves threatened by robotics. Will a non-
European population struggling to make ends meet accept the taxation necessary for Social Security and Medicare for a demonized group of the population that they have been taught to hate? Identity Politics does not permit social cohesion.
Decades of unbroken massive inflows of third world immigrants have destroyed the “melting pot” and
produced in its place a tower of babel. Multicultural populations lack a common interest. They are the antithesis of a nation. Everywhere in the Western world the nations are expiring.
In 1973 John Raspail predicted the fate of European peoples in his novel, The Camp of the Saints. White
people are now living his novel.
It will be interesting to see if the growing Hispanic population displaces the shrinking white population as the group against which blacks will make claims for slavery reparations. Hispanics consist in part of Spanish and Portuguese ancestry, and the Spanish and Portuguese were colonial powers in the New World who
enslaved people. In a world of Identity Politics, will Hispanics replace white people as the victimizer?
It will also be interesting to see if the Israel lobby can put the same ring through the nose of the rising Hispanic/Asian majority as they have through the nose of the declining white majority. Can Hispanics and Asians be made to feel guilty about the holocaust and
persecution of Jews? Can their leaders, like white leaders, be bought into Israel’s service?
Or will people accustomed to the privilege of victim status themselves have the confidence to reject that they owe obligations to other victims?
Dr Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. The article was first published by the author’s website -- https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/. Dr. Roberts has granted permission to Press TV to republish his articles. (The views expressed in this article do not necessarily
reflect those of Press TV.) *https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2019/09/07/605570/The-end-of-white-America-and-Israel-lobby
___________________________________________________
3
The Takeover By Whitney Webb - September 06th, 2019
How an insider job is planned – it began with New
Zealand Prime Minister Adern who advocates not
mentioning the perpetrator’s name – keeping it secret -
Was used to initiate such a program of silence the other
western democratic head of states.
How the CIA, Mossad
and “the Epstein
Network” are
Exploiting Mass
Shootings to Create an
Orwellian Nightmare.
Feature photo | Graphic by Claudio Cabrera
Following another catastrophic mass shooting or crisis event, Orwellian “solutions” are set to be foisted on a frightened American public by the very network connected, not only to Jeffrey Epstein, but to a litany of crimes and a frightening history of plans to crush internal dissent in the United States.
Following the arrest and subsequent death in prison
of alleged child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, a
little-known Israeli tech company began to receive
increased publicity, but for all the wrong reasons.
Not long after Epstein’s arrest, and his relationships
and finances came under scrutiny, it was revealed
that the Israeli company Carbyne911 had received
substantial funding from Jeffrey Epstein as well as
Epstein’s close associate and former Prime Minister
of Israel Ehud Barak, and Silicon Valley venture
capitalist and prominent Trump backer Peter Thiel.
Carbyne911, or simply Carbyne, develops call-
handling and identification capabilities for
emergency response services in countries around
the world, including the United States, where it has
already been implemented in several U.S. counties
and has partnered with major U.S. tech companies
like Google. It specifically markets its product as a
way of mitigating mass shootings in the United
States without having to change existing U.S. gun
laws.
Yet, Carbyne is no ordinary tech company, as it is
deeply connected to the elite Israeli military
intelligence division, Unit 8200, whose “alumni”
often go on to create tech companies — Carbyne
among them — that frequently maintain their ties
to Israeli intelligence and, according to Israeli
media reports and former employees, often “blur
the line” between their service to Israel’s
defense/intelligence apparatus and their
commercial activity. As this report will reveal,
Carbyne is but one of several Israeli tech
companies marketing themselves as a technological
solution to mass shootings that has direct ties to
Israeli intelligence agencies.
In each case, these companies’ products are built
in such a way that they can easily be used to
illegally surveil the governments, institutions and
civilians that use them, a troubling fact given Unit
8200’s documented prowess in surveillance as a
means of obtaining blackmail and Israel’s history of
using tech companies to aggressively spy on the
U.S. government. This is further compounded by
the fact that Unit 8200-linked tech companies have
previously received U.S. government contracts to
place “backdoors” into the U.S.’ entire
telecommunications system as well as into the
popular products of major American tech
companies including Google, Microsoft and
Facebook, many of whose key managers and
executives are now former Unit 8200 officers.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has
made it no secret that placing Unit 8200 members
in top positions in multinational tech companies is a
“deliberate policy” meant to ensure Israel’s role as
the dominant global “cyber power”, while also
combating non-violent boycott movements
targeting Israel’s violations of international law and
stifling the United Nations’ criticisms of Israeli
government policy and military operations abroad.
As Jeffrey Epstein’s links to intelligence in both the
United States and Israel — the subject of a recent
four-part series exclusive to MintPress — began to
be revealed in full, his financing of Carbyne came
under scrutiny, particularly for the company’s deep
ties to Israeli intelligence as well as to certain
Americans with known connections to U.S.
intelligence. Ehud Barak’s own role as both
financier and chairman of Carbyne has also added
to that concern, given his long history of
involvement in covert intelligence operations for
Israel and his long-standing ties to Israeli military
intelligence.
Another funder of Carbyne, Peter Thiel, has his own
company that, like Carbyne, is set to profit from
the Trump administration’s proposed hi-tech
solutions to mass shootings. Indeed, after the
recent shooting in El Paso, Texas, President Trump
— who received political donations from and has
been advised by Thiel following his election —
asked tech companies to “detect mass shooters
before they strike,” a service already perfected by
Thiel’s company Palantir, which has developed
“pre-crime software” already in use throughout the
country. Palantir is also a contractor for the U.S.
intelligence community and also has a branch
based in Israel.
Perhaps most disturbing of all, whatever
technological solution is adopted by the Trump
administration, it is set to use a controversial
database first developed as part of a secretive U.S.
government program that involved notorious Iran-
Contra figures like Oliver North as a means of
tracking and flagging potential American dissidents
for increased surveillance and detention in the
event of a vaguely defined “national emergency.”
As this report will reveal, this database — often
referred to as “Main Core” — was created with the
involvement of Israeli intelligence and Israel
4
remained involved years after it was developed,
and potentially to the present. It was also used by
at least one former CIA official on President
Reagan’s National Security Council to blackmail
members of Congress, Congressional staffers and
journalists, among others.
Given recent reports on the Trump administration’s
plan to create a new government agency to use
“advanced technology” to identify “neurobehavioral
signs” of “someone headed toward a violent
explosive act” using data collected by consumer
electronic devices, the picture painted by the
technology currently being promoted and
implemented under the guise of “keeping
Americans safe” is deeply Orwellian. In fact, it
points directly to the genesis of a far-reaching
surveillance state far more extensive than anything
yet seen in American history and it is being jointly
developed by individuals connected to both
American and Israeli intelligence.
Demystifying Carbyne
Carbyne911, which will be referred to simply as
Carbyne in this report, is an Israeli tech-startup
that promises to revolutionize how calls are
handled by emergency service providers, as well as
by governments, corporations and educational
institutions. Not long after it was founded in 2014
by veterans of Israeli military intelligence, Carbyne
began to be specifically marketed as a solution to
mass shootings in the United States that goes
“beyond the gun debate” and improves the
“intelligence that armed emergency responders
receive before entering an armed shooter situation”
by providing video-streaming and acoustic input
from civilian smartphones and other devices
connected to the Carbyne network.
Prior to Jeffrey Epstein’s arrest in July, Carbyne had
been receiving high praise from U.S. and Israeli
media, with Fox News hailing the company’s
services as the answer to the U.S.’ “aging 911
systems” and the Jerusalem Post writing that the
company’s platform offers “hi-tech protection to
social workers and school principals.” Other reports
claimed that Carbyne’s services result in “a 65%
reduction in time-to-dispatch.”
Carbyne’s call-handling/crisis management
platform has already been implemented in several
U.S. counties and the company has offices not only
in the U.S. but also in Mexico, Ukraine and Israel.
Carbyne’s expansion to more emergency service
provider networks in the U.S. is likely, given that
federal legislation seeks to offer grants to upgrade
911 call centers throughout the country with the
very technology of which Carbyne is the leading
provider. One of the main lobby groups promoting
this legislation, the National Emergency Number
Association (NENA), has a “strong relationship”
with Carbyne, according to Carbyne’s website. In
addition, Carbyne has also begun marketing its
platform for non-emergency calls to governments,
educational institutions and corporations.
Yet, what seemed like the inevitability of Carbyne’s
widespread adoption in the U.S. hit a snag
following the recent arrest and subsequent death of
sex trafficker and pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, who
exploited underage girls for the purpose of
obtaining “blackmail” on the rich and poweful, an
operation that had clear ties to intelligence.
Epstein, after his first arrest and light sentence for
soliciting sex from a minor in 2007, was tapped by
former Israeli Prime
Minister and former head
of Israeli military
intelligence Ehud Barak,
to become a key financial
backer of Carbyne.
Ehud Barak, center, poses with Carbyne co-founders Alex Dizengof, Amir Elichai and Lital Leshem. Photo | Yossi Seliger
As a result of increased scrutiny of Epstein’s
business activities and his ties to Israel, particularly
to Barak, Epstein’s connection to Carbyne was
revealed and extensively reported on by the
independent media outlet Narativ, whose exposé
on Carbyne revealed not only some of the key
intelligence connections of the start-up company
but also how the architecture of Carbyne’s product
itself raises “serious privacy concerns.”
MintPress detailed many of Carbyne’s main
intelligence connections in Part III of the
investigative series “Inside the Jeffrey Epstein
Scandal: Too Big to Fail.” In addition to Barak —
former Israeli prime minister and former head of
Israeli military intelligence — serving as Carbyne’s
chairman and a key financer, the company’s
executive team are all former members of Israeli
intelligence, including the elite military intelligence
unit, Unit 8200, which is often compared to the
U.S. National Security Agency (NSA).
Carbyne’s current CEO, Amir Elichai, served in Unit
8200 and tapped former Unit 8200 commander and
current board member of AIPAC Pinchas Buchris to
serve as the company’s director and on its board.
In addition to Elichai, another Carbyne co-founder,
Lital Leshem, also served in Unit 8200 and later
worked for Israeli private spy company Black Cube.
The only Carbyne co-founder that didn’t serve in
Unit 8200 is Alex Dizengof, who previously worked
for Israel’s Prime Minister’s office.
As MintPress noted in a past report detailing Israeli
military intelligence’s deep ties to American tech
giant Microsoft, Unit 8200 is an elite unit of the
Israeli Intelligence corps that is part of the IDF’s
Directorate of Military Intelligence and is involved
mainly in signal intelligence (i.e., surveillance),
cyberwarfare and code decryption. It is frequently
described as the Israeli equivalent of the NSA and
Peter Roberts, senior research fellow at Britain’s
Royal United Services Institute, characterized the
5
unit in an interview with the Financial Times as
“probably the foremost technical intelligence
agency in the world and stand[ing] on a par with
the NSA in everything except scale.”
Notably, the NSA and Unit 8200 have collaborated
on numerous projects, most infamously on the
Stuxnet virus as well as the Duqu malware. In
addition, the NSA is known to work with veterans
of Unit 8200 in the private sector, such as when
the NSA hired two Israeli companies, to create
backdoors into all the major U.S.
telecommunications systems and major tech
companies, including Facebook, Microsoft and
Google. Both of those companies, Verint and Narus,
have top executives with ties to Israeli intelligence
and one of those companies, Verint (formerly
Comverse Infosys), has a history of aggressively
spying on U.S. government facilities. Unit 8200 is
also known for spying on civilians in the occupied
Palestinian territories for “coercion purposes” —
i.e., gathering info for blackmail — and also for
spying on Palestinian-Americans via an intelligence-
sharing agreement with the NSA.
Unlike many other Unit 8200-linked start-ups,
Carbyne also boasts several tie-ins to the Trump
administration, including Palantir founder and
Trump ally Peter Thiel — another investor in
Carbyne. In addition, Carbyne’s board of advisers
includes former Palantir employee Trae Stephens,
who was a member of the Trump transition team,
as well as former Secretary of Homeland Security
Michael Chertoff. Trump donor and New York real-
estate developer Eliot Tawill is also on Carbyne’s
board, alongside Ehud Barak and Pinchas Buchris.
Yet, privacy concerns with Carbyne go beyond the
company’s ties to Israeli intelligence and U.S.
intelligence contractors like Peter Thiel. For
instance, Carbyne’s smartphone app extracts the
following information from the phones on which it
is installed:
Device location, video live-streamed from the
smartphone to the call center, text messages in a
two-way chat window, any data from a user’s phone if
they have the Carbyne app and ESInet, and any
information that comes over a data link, which Carbyne
opens in case the caller’s voice link drops out.”
(emphasis added)
According to Carbyne’s website, this same
information can also be obtained from any
smartphone, even if it does
not have Carbyne’s app
installed, if that phone calls a
911 call center that uses
Carbyne or merely any other
number connected to
Carbyne’s network.
Carbyne gathers data points from users’ phones as well as a myriad of other web-connected devices.
Carbyne is a Next-Generation 9-11 (NG911)
platform and the explicit goal of NG911 is for all
911 systems nationwide to become interconnected.
Thus, even if Carbyne is not used by all 911 call
centers using an NG911 platform, Carbyne will
ostensibly have access to the data used by all
emergency service providers and devices
connected to those networks. This guiding principle
of NG911 also makes it likely that one platform will
be favored at the federal level to foster such
interconnectivity and, given that it has already
been adopted by several counties and has ties to
the Trump administration, Carbyne is the logical
choice.
Another cause for concern is how other countries
have used platforms like Carbyne, which were first
marketed as emergency response tools, for the
purpose of mass surveillance. Narativ noted the
following in its investigation of Carbyne:
In May, Human Rights Watch revealed Chinese
authorities use a platform not unlike Carbyne to
illegally surveil Uyghurs. China’s Integrated Joint
Operations Platform brings in a much bigger data-
set and sources of video, which includes an app on
people’s phones. Like Carbyne, the platform was
designed to report emergencies. Chinese
authorities have turned it into a tool of mass
surveillance.
Human Rights Watch reverse-engineered the app.
The group discovered the app automatically profiles
a user under 36 “person types” including “followers
of Six Lines” which is the term used to identify
Uyghurs. Another term refers to “Hajj,” the annual
Islamic pilgrimage to Mecca. The app monitors
every aspect of a user’s life, including personal
conversations [and] power usage, and tracks a
user’s movement.”
Such technology is currently used by Israeli military
intelligence and Israel’s domestic intelligence
agency Shin Bet to justify “pre-crime” detentions of
Palestinians in the occupied West Bank. As will be
noted in greater detail later in this report,
Palestinians’ comments on social media are tracked
by artificial intelligence algorithms that flag them
for indefinite detention if they write social media
posts that contain “tripwire” phrases such as “the
sword of Allah.”
Carbyne’s platform has its own “pre-crime”
elements, such as it’s c-Records component, which
stores and analyzes information on past calls and
events that pass through its network. This
information “enables decision makers to accurately
analyze the past and present behavior of their callers,
react accordingly, and in time predict future
patterns.” (emphasis added)
Concerns have recently been raised that “pre-
crime” technology may soon become more widely
adopted in the U.S., after President Trump stated
that one of his planned solutions to mass shootings
6
in the wake of the recent tragedy in El Paso was for
big tech companies to detect potential shooters
before they strike.
Israeli intelligence, Blackmail and Silicon Valley
Though many of the individuals involved in funding
or managing Carbyne have proven ties to
intelligence, a closer look into several of these
players reveals even deeper connections to both
Israeli and U.S. intelligence.
One of Carbyne’s clearest connections to Israeli
intelligence is through its chairman and one of its
funders, Ehud Barak. Though Barak is best known
for being a former prime minister of Israel, he is
also a former minister of defense and the former
head of Israeli military intelligence. He oversaw
Unit 8200’s operations, as well as other units of
Israeli military intelligence, in all three of those
positions. For most of his military and later political
career, Barak has been closely associated with
covert operations.
Prior to the public scrutiny of Barak’s relationship
to Jeffrey Epstein, following the latter’s arrest this
past July and subsequent death, Barak had come
under fire for his ties to disgraced film mogul
Harvey Weinstein. Indeed, it was Ehud Barak who
put Weinstein in contact with the Israeli private
intelligence outfit Black Cube, which employs
former Mossad agents and Israeli military
intelligence operatives, as Weinstein sought to
intimidate the women who had accused him of
sexual assault and sexual harassment. Former
Mossad director Meir Dagan led Black Cube’s board
until his death in 2016 and Carbyne co-founder
Lital Leshem is Black Cube’s former director of
marketing.
After Barak put him in contact with Black Cube’s
leadership, Weinstein, according to The New
Yorker, used the private spy firm to “‘target,’ or
collect information on, dozens of individuals, and
compile psychological profiles that sometimes
focused on their personal or sexual histories.” In
addition, The New Yorker noted that “Weinstein
monitored the progress of the investigations
personally” and “also enlisted former employees
from his film enterprises to join in the effort,
collecting names and placing calls that, according
to some sources who received them, felt
intimidating.”
Yet, more recently, it has been Barak’s close
relationship to Epstein that has raised eyebrows
and opened him up to political attacks from his
rivals. Epstein and Barak were first introduced by
former Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres in 2002,
a time when Epstein’s pedophile blackmail and sex
trafficking operation was in full swing.
Barak was a frequent visitor to Epstein’s residences
in New York, so often that The Daily Beast reported
that numerous residents of an apartment building
linked to Epstein “had seen Barak in the building
multiple times over the last few years, and nearly
half a dozen more described running into his
security detail,” adding that “the building is
majority-owned by Epstein’s younger brother,
Mark, and has been tied to the financier’s alleged
New York trafficking ring.” Specifically, several
apartments in the building were “being used to
house underage girls from South America, Europe
and the former Soviet Union,” according to a
former bookkeeper employed by one of Epstein’s
main procurers of underage girls, Jean Luc Brunel.
Barak is also known to have spent the night at one
of Epstein’s residences at least once, was
photographed leaving Epstein’s residence as
recently as 2016, and has admitted to visiting
Epstein’s island, which has sported nicknames
including “Pedo Island,” “Lolita Island” and “Orgy
Island.” In 2004, Barak received $2.5 million from
Leslie Wexner’s Wexner Foundation, where Epstein
was a trustee as well as one of the foundation’s top
donors, officially for unspecified “consulting
services” and “research” on the foundation’s behalf.
In 2015, Barak formed a limited partnership
company in Israel for the explicit purpose of
investing in Carbyne (then known as Reporty) and
invested millions of dollars in the company, quickly
becoming a major shareholder and subsequently
the company’s public face and the chairman of its
board. At least $1 million of the money invested in
this Barak-created company that was later used to
invest in Carbyne came from the Southern Trust
Company, which was owned by Jeffrey Epstein.
In July, Bloomberg reported that Epstein’s
Southern Trust Company is identified in U.S. Virgin
Islands filings as “a DNA database and data
mining” company. Given Carbyne’s clear potential
for data-mining and civilian profiling, Epstein’s
investment in Carbyne using this specific company
suggests that Carbyne’s investors have long been
aware of this little advertised aspect of Carbyne’s
product.
In a statement to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz,
Barak asserted:
“I saw the business opportunity and registered a
partnership in my control in Israel. A small number
of people I know invest in it…Since these are
private investments, it wouldn’t be proper or right
for me to expose the investors’ details.”
However, Barak later admitted that Epstein had
been one of the investors.
MintPress’ recent series on the Jeffrey Epstein
scandal noted in detail Epstein’s ties to CIA/Mossad
intelligence assets, such as Adnan Khashoggi; CIA
front companies, such as Southern Air Transport;
and organized crime, through his close association
with Leslie Wexner. In addition, Epstein’s long-time
“girlfriend” and alleged madam, Ghislaine Maxwell,
has family links to Israeli intelligence through her
father, Robert Maxwell. While it appears that
7
Epstein may have been working for more than one
intelligence agency, Zev Shalev, former executive
producer for CBS News and journalist at Narativ,
recently stated that he had independently
confirmed with two unconnected sources “closely
connected to the Epstein story and in a position to
know” that Epstein had “worked for Israeli military
intelligence.”
-------------------------------------
Zev Shalev @ZevShalev
Exclusive: We have two independent sources confirming
Jeffrey Epstein worked for Israeli military intelligence. In
each case the source is closely connected to the Epstein
story and in a position to know. You can take it to the
bank.
@narativlive http://narativ.org/2019/07/27/building-big-brother/ …
Jeffrey Epstein: Building Big Brother
Exclusive: Jeffrey Epstein's investment in an Israeli start-up reveals a myriad of links to Donald Trump and Israeli spies.
narativ.org
1,056
7:47 AM - Aug 21, 2019
----------------------- Notably, Epstein, who was known for his interest in
obtaining blackmail through the sexual abuse of the
underaged girls he exploited, also claimed to have
“damaging information” on prominent figures in
Silicon Valley. In a conversation last year with New
York Times reporter James Stewart, Epstein
claimed to have “potentially damaging or
embarrassing” information on Silicon Valley’s elite
and told Stewart that these top figures in the
American tech industry “were hedonistic and
regular users of recreational drugs.” Epstein also
told Stewart that he had “witnessed prominent tech
figures taking drugs and arranging for sex” and
claimed to know “details about their supposed
sexual proclivities.”
In the lead-up to his recent arrest, Jeffrey Epstein
appeared to have been attempting to rebrand as a
“tech investor,” as he had done interviews with
several journalists including Stewart about
technology investing in the months before he was
hit with federal sex trafficking charges.
Jessica Lessin, editor-in-chief of The Information,
told Business Insider that a journalist working for
The Information had interviewed Epstein a month
before his recent arrest because “he was believed
to be an investor in venture capital funds.”
However, Lessin claimed that the interview was not
“newsworthy” and said the site had no plans to
publish its contents. Business Insider claimed that
the way the interviews with Epstein had been
arranged “suggests that someone in Silicon Valley
may have been trying to help Epstein connect with
reporters.”
Though it is unknown exactly which Silicon Valley
figures were most connected to Epstein and which
tech executives were potentially being blackmailed
by Epstein, it is known that Epstein associated with
several prominent tech executives, including
Google co-founder Sergey Brin, Facebook co-
founder Mark Zuckerberg, Tesla CEO Elon Musk,
Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, and LinkedIn co-
founder Reid Hoffman.
Last year, Epstein claimed to be advising Tesla and
Elon Musk, who had been previously photographed
with Epstein’s alleged madam Ghislaine Maxwell. A
few years ago, Epstein also attended a dinner
hosted by LinkedIn’s Reid Hoffman, where Musk
had allegedly introduced Epstein to Mark
Zuckerberg. Google’s Sergey Brin is known to have
attended a dinner hosted
by Epstein at his New York
residence where Donald
Trump was also in
attendance.
Elon Musk with Epstein’s alleged madam Ghislaine Maxwell at an Oscars after-
party on March 2, 2014. Kevin Mazur | VF14
These associations suggest that the person in
Silicon Valley who was trying to boost Epstein’s
image as a tech investor before his arrest may
have been Peter Thiel, whose Founders Fund had
also invested in Carbyne. Thiel was an early
investor in Facebook and is still on its board,
connecting him to Zuckerberg; he is also a funder
of Elon Musk’s SpaceX and a former colleague of
Musk’s through PayPal. In addition, Thiel has ties to
Reid Hoffman and both Thiel and Hoffman are
prominent backers of Facebook.
It is unknown whether Epstein’s “damaging
information” and apparent blackmail on notable
individuals in the American technology industry
were used to advance the objectives of Carbyne,
which recently partnered with tech giants Google
and Cisco Systems — and, more broadly, the
expansion of Israeli intelligence-linked tech
companies into the American tech sector,
particularly through the acquisition of Israeli tech
start-ups linked to Unit 8200 by major U.S. tech
companies.
The latter seems increasingly likely given that the
father of Ghislaine Maxwell — one of Epstein’s chief
co-conspirators in his intelligence-linked sexual
blackmail operation involving minors — was a
Mossad operative who helped sell software that had
been bugged by Israeli intelligence to government
agencies and sensitive facilities around the world,
including in the United States.
8
As will be noted later in this report, Israel’s Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu — to whom all of
Israel’s intelligence agencies answer by virtue of
his position — has stated on more than one
occasion that the acquisition of Israeli intelligence-
linked start-ups by foreign tech giants, especially in
Silicon Valley, is a current and “deliberate policy” of
the state of Israel.
Carbyne’s ties to U.S. intelligence
While Epstein and Barak are the two financiers of
Carbyne whose ties to intelligence are clearest,
another funder of Carbyne, Peter Thiel, has ties to
U.S. intelligence and a history of investing in other
companies founded by former members of Unit
8200. Thiel co-founded and still owns a controlling
stake in the company Palantir, which was initially
funded with a $2 million investment from the CIA’s
venture capital fund In-Q-Tel and quickly thereafter
became a contractor for the CIA.
After the success of its contract with the CIA,
Palantir became a contractor for a variety of federal
agencies, including the FBI, the Defense
Intelligence Agency (DIA), the National Security
Agency (NSA), the Department of Homeland
Security(DHS) and the military’s Special Operations
Command, among others. Last year, it won a
contract to create a new battlefield intelligence
system for the U.S. Army. Palantir is also in
demand for its “pre-crime technology,” which has
been used by several U.S. police departments.
According to the Guardian, “Palantir tracks
everyone from potential terrorist suspects to
corporate fraudsters, child traffickers and what
they refer to as ‘subversives’… it is all done using
prediction.”
Thiel has gained attention in recent years for his
support of President Trump and for becoming an
adviser to Trump following the 2016 election, when
he was “a major force in the transition,” according
to Politico, and “helped fill positions in the Trump
administration with former staff.” One of those
former staffers was Trae Stephens, who is also on
Carbyne’s board of advisers. Thiel also has
business ties to Trump’s son-in-law and influential
adviser, Jared Kushner, as well as to Kushner’s
brother Josh. A senior Trump campaign aide told
Politico in 2017 that “Thiel is immensely powerful
within the administration through his connection to
Jared.”
Thiel has also backed some prominent Israeli tech
start-ups connected to Unit 8200, such as
BillGuard, which Thiel funded along with former
Google CEO Eric Schmidt and other investors.
BillGuard was founded by Raphael Ouzan, a former
officer in Unit 8200, who serves on the board of
directors of Start-Up Nation Central (SUNC)
alongside neoconservative American hedge fund
manager Paul Singer, neoconservative political
operative and adviser Dan Senor, and Terry Kassel,
who works for Singer at his
hedge fund, Elliott
Management.
Peter Thiel greets Netanyahu during a 2017 meeting in Israel. Photo | Israel PM
SUNC is an organization founded by Paul Singer,
who has donated heavily to both President Trump
and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu. Since it was
founded in 2012, SUNC has sought to integrate
Unit 8200-connected Israeli tech start-ups into
foreign companies, primarily American companies,
and has helped oversee the shift of thousands of
high-paying tech jobs from the U.S. to Israel.
Another Carbyne-connected individual worth noting
is the former head of the Department of Homeland
Security, Michael Chertoff, who serves on
Carbyne’s board of advisers. In addition to
Chertoff’s ties to DHS, Chertoff’s company, The
Chertoff Group, employees several prominent
former members of the U.S. intelligence community
as principals, including Michael Hayden, former
director of the CIA and former director of the NSA;
and Charles Allen, former assistant director of
Central Intelligence for Collection at the CIA, who
worked at the agency for over 40 years.
The Chertoff Group has a long-standing and
lucrative contract with the company OSI Systems,
which produces full-body scanners and markets
itself as a solution to mass shootings and crisis
events, not unlike Carbyne. While Chertoff’s
company was advising OSI Systems, Chertoff went
on a media blitz to promote the widespread use of
the machines produced by OSI Systems and even
called on Congress to “fund a large-scale
deployment of next-generation systems.” Chertoff
did not disclose his conflict of interest while publicly
promoting OSI’s full-body scanners.
Some have also alleged that Chertoff’s mother,
Livia Eisen, had links to Israeli intelligence.
According to her 1998 obituary, cited by both
researcher/author Christopher Bollyn and journalist
Jonathan Cook, Eisen participated in the Mossad
operation code-named “Magic Carpet” while
working for Israel’s El Al Airlines. Both Bollyn and
Cook have suggested that Eisen’s participation in
this covert Israeli intelligence operation strongly
indicates that she had ties to the Mossad.
Melding into Silicon Valley
Beyond its troubling connections to Silicon Valley
oligarchs, Israeli military intelligence and the U.S.-
military industrial complex, Carbyne’s recent
partnerships with two specific technology
companies — Google and Cisco Systems — raise
even more red flags.
Carbyne announced its partnership with Cisco
Systems this past April, with the latter announcing
that it would begin “aligning its unified call
manager with Carbyne’s call-handling platform,
9
allowing emergency call centers to collect data
from both 911 callers and nearby government-owned
IoT [Internet of Things] devices.” A report on the
partnership published by Government Technology
magazine stated that “Carbyne’s platform will be
integrated into Cisco Kinetic for Cities, an IoT data
platform that shares data across community
infrastructure, smart city solutions, applications
and connected devices.” The report also noted that
“Carbyne will also be the only 911 solution in the
Cisco Marketplace.”
As part of the partnership, Carbyne’s President of
North American Operations Paul Tatro told
Government Technology that the Carbyne platform
would combine the data it obtains from
smartphones and other Carbyne-connected devices
with “what’s available through nearby Cisco-
connected road cameras, roadside sensors, smart
streetlamps, smart parking meters or other
devices.” Tatro further asserted that “Carbyne can
also analyze data that’s being collected by Cisco
IoT devices … and alert 911 automatically, without
any person making a phone call, if there appears to
be a worthy problem,” and expressed his view that
soon most emergency calls will not be made by
human beings but “by smart cars, telematics or
other smart city devices.”
A few months after partnering with Cisco Systems,
Carbyne announced its partnership with Google on
July 10, just three days after Carbyne funder
Jeffrey Epstein was arrested in New York on federal
sex trafficking charges. Carbyne’s press release of
the partnership described how the company and
Google would be teaming up in Mexico “to offer
advanced mobile location to emergency
communications centers (ECCs) throughout Mexico”
following the
conclusion of a
successful four-week
pilot program between
Carbyne and Google in
the Central American
nation.
Google Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt meets Netanyahu at his Jerusalem office. Israel PM | YouTube
The press release also stated:
Carbyne will provide Google’s Android ELS
(Emergency Location Service) in real time from
emergency calls made on AndroidTM devices.
Deployment for any ECC in the country won’t
require any integration, with Carbyne providing
numerous options for connection to their secure
ELS Gateway once an ECC is approved. The
Carbyne automated platform, requiring no human
interaction, has the potential to save thousands of
lives each year throughout Mexico.”
The reason Carybne’s partnerships with Cisco
Systems and Google are significant lies in the role
that Cisco and former Google CEO Eric Schmidt
have played in the creation of a controversial
“incubator” for Israeli tech start-ups with deep ties
to Israeli military intelligence, American
neoconservative donor Paul Singer, and the U.S.’
National Security Agency (NSA).
This company, called Team8, is an Israeli
company-creation platform whose CEO and co-
founder is Nadav Zafrir, former commander of Unit
8200. Two of the company’s other three co-
founders are also “alumni” of Unit 8200. Among
Team8’s top investors is Schmidt, the former CEO
of Google, who also joined Peter Thiel in funding
the Unit 8200-linked BillGuard, as well as major
tech companies including Cisco Systems and
Microsoft.
Last year, Team8 controversially hired the former
head of the NSA and U.S. Cyber Command, Retired
Admiral Mike Rogers, and Zafrir stated that his
interest in hiring Rogers was that Rogers would be
“instrumental in helping strategize” Team8’s
expansion in the United States. Jake Williams, a
veteran of NSA’s Tailored Access Operations (TAO)
hacking unit, told CyberScoop:
Rogers is not being brought into this role because
of his technical experience. …It’s purely because of
his knowledge of classified operations and his
ability to influence many in the U.S. government
and private-sector contractors.”
Team8 has also been heavily promoted by Start-Up
Nation Central (SUNC). SUNC prominently features
Team8 and Zafrir on the cybersecurity section of its
website and also sponsored a talk by Zafrir and an
Israeli government economist at the World
Economic Forum, often referred to as “Davos,” that
was attended personally by Paul Singer.
SUNC itself has deep ties to Israeli military
intelligence, with former Unit 8200 officer Raphael
Ouzan serving on its board of directors. Another
example of SUNC-Unit 8200 ties can be seen with
Inbal Arieli, who served as SUNC’s Vice President of
Strategic Partnerships from 2014 to 2017 and
continues to serve as a senior adviser to the
organization. Arieli, a former lieutenant in Unit
8200, is the founder and head of the 8200
Entrepreneurship and Innovation Support Program
(EISP), which was the first start-up accelerator in
Israel aimed at harnessing “the vast network and
entrepreneurial DNA of [Unit] 8200 alumni” and is
currently one of the top company accelerators in
Israel, alongside Team8. Arieli was the top
executive at 8200 EISP while working at SUNC and
several other top SUNC staffers are also connected
to Israeli military intelligence.
Thus, Google and Cisco’s connections to Team8
suggests that their partnerships with another
Israeli military intelligence-connected firm like
Carbyne is a deepening of those two companies’
links to the growing bi-national security state that
10
is uniting key players in the U.S. military-industrial
complex and Israeli intelligence.
Mossad-backed Panic Buttons, coming to a school near you
Carbyne is hardly the only Israeli intelligence-linked
tech company marketing itself in the United States
as a solution to mass shootings. Another Israeli
start-up, known as Gabriel, was founded in 2016 in
response to a shooting in Tel Aviv and the Pulse
Nightclub shooting in the United States, which took
place just days apart.
Created by Israeli-American Yoni Sherizen and
Israeli citizen Asaf Adler, Gabriel is similar to
Carbyne in the sense that elements of its crisis
response platform require installation on civilian
smartphones as well as devices used by crisis
responders. The main difference is that Gabriel also
installs one or a series of physical “panic buttons,”
depending on the size of the building to be secured,
that also double as video and audio communication
devices connected to the Gabriel network.
As with Carbyne, the ties between Gabriel and
Israeli intelligence are obvious. Indeed, Gabriel’s
four-person advisory board includes Ram Ben-
Barak, former deputy director of the Mossad and
former director-general of Israel’s intelligence
ministry; Yohanan Danino, former chief of police for
the state of Israel; and Kobi Mor, former director of
overseas missions for the Israeli intelligence
agency Shin Bet. The only American on the
advisory board is Ryan Petty, the father of a
Parkland shooting victim and friend of former
Florida Governor Rick Scott.
Gabriel’s only disclosed funder is U.S.-based
MassChallenge, a start-up accelerator non-profit.
Gabriel is funded by MassChallenge’s Israel branch,
which was opened six months prior to Gabriel’s
creation and is partnered with the Israeli
government and the Kraft Group. The Kraft Group
is managed by Robert Kraft, who is currently
embroiled in a prostitution scandal and is also a
close friend of President Trump.
Notably, one of MassChallenge Israel’s featured
experts is Wendy Singer, the executive director of
SUNC, the organization created and funded by
neoconservative Trump backer Paul Singer with the
explicit purpose of promoting Israel’s tech start-ups
and their integration into foreign, chiefly American,
businesses. As was noted in a recent MintPress
report on SUNC, Wendy Singer is the sister of
neoconservative political operative Dan Senor, who
founded the now-defunct Foreign Policy Initiative
with Robert Kagan and Bill Kristol, and was
previously the director of AIPAC’s Israel office for
16 years.
Gabriel’s founders have been quite upfront about
the fact that the uptick in shootings in the U.S. has
greatly aided their company’s growth and success.
Last November, Sherizen told The Jerusalem Post
that new mass shootings in the U.S. not only
increased U.S. demand for his company’s product
but also were opportunities to show the
effectiveness of Gabriel’s approach:
Unfortunately every month there seems to be
another high-profile event of this nature. After the
Vegas shooting, we were able to show [that] our
system would have managed to identify the
location of the shooter much quicker.”
The Jerusalem Post noted that Gabriel is set to
make considerable profits if concern over mass
shootings continues to build in the U.S., writing:
With more than 475,000 soft targets across the US
and amid increasing security fears, the potential
market for Gabriel is huge. The company could gain
revenues of almost $1 billion if only 10% of soft
targets were to invest around $20,000 in its alert
systems.”
Sherizen told the Jerusalem Post:
Our starter kit costs $10,000. Depending on the
size and makeup of the community building, it
would cost between $20-30,000 to fully outfit the
location. We have made it very affordable. This is a
game-changer for the lock-down and active shooter
drills that are now a standard part of any child’s
upbringing in the States.”
Much more than just a start-up
While it is certainly possible that numerous former
officials and commanders of elite Israeli intelligence
agencies may have no ulterior motive in advising or
founding technology start-up companies, it is worth
pointing out that top figures in Israel’s military
intelligence agencies and the Mossad don’t see it
that way.
Last March, Israeli media outlet Calcalist Tech
published a report entitled “Israel Blurs the Line
Between Defense Apparatus and Local
Cybersecurity Hub,” which noted that “since 2012,
cyber-related and intelligence projects that were
previously carried out in-house in the Israeli
military and Israel’s main intelligence arms are
transferred to companies that in some cases were
built for this exact purpose.” (emphasis added)
The article notes that beginning in 2012, Israel’s
intelligence and military intelligence agencies
began to outsource “activities that were previously
managed in-house, with a focus on software and cyber
technologies.” (emphasis added)
It continues:
In some cases, managers of development projects
in the Israeli military and intelligence arms were
encouraged to form their own companies, which
then took over the project,’ an Israeli venture
capitalist familiar with the matter told Calcalist
Tech.”
Notably, Calcalist Tech states that the controversial
company Black Cube was created this way and that
Black Cube had been contracted, and is likely still
11
contracted, by Israel’s Ministry of Defense. The
private security agency Black Cube is known to
have two separate divisions for corporations and
governments. The firm was recently caught
attempting to undermine the Iran nuclear deal —
then also a top political objective of Israeli Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu — by attempting to
obtain information on the “financial or sexual
impropriety” (i.e., blackmail) of top U.S. officials
involved in drafting the accord. NBC News noted
last year that “Black Cube’s political work
frequently intersects with Israel’s
foreign policy priorities.” As
previously mentioned, one of
Carbyne’s co-founders — Lital
Leshem, also a veteran of Unit
8200 — worked for Black Cube
prior to starting Carbyne.
The entrance to Black Cube’s offices on the 26th floor of a Tel Aviv high rise, Feb. 8, 2019. Raphael Satter | AP
One of the main companies profiled in the Calcalist
Tech report appeared to be a front for Israeli
intelligence, as its registered owner was found not
to exist: even high-level employees at the company
had never heard of him; his registered addresses
were for nonexistent locations in Israel’s capital of
Tel Aviv; and the three people with that name in
Tel Aviv denied any association with the business.
This company — which Calcalist Tech was unable to
name after the Israeli military censor determined
that doing so could negatively impact Israeli
“national security” — was deliberately created to
service the Israeli military and Israeli intelligence.
It is also “focused on cyber technologies with
expertise in research and development of advanced
products and applications suitable for defense and
commercial entities.” (emphases added) In addition,
the company’s management consists largely of
“veterans of Israeli military technology units.”
Notably, a former employee of this company told
Calcalist Tech that “crossing the lines between
military service and employment at the commercial
outfit was ‘commonplace’ while he was working at
the company.”
It’s not exactly clear why Israel’s military
intelligence and other intelligence agencies decided
to begin outsourcing its operations in 2012, though
Calcalist Tech suggests the reasoning was related
to the difference in wages between the private
sector and the public sector, with pay being much
higher in the former. However, it is notable that
2012 was also the year that Paul Singer — together
with Netanyahu’s long-time economic adviser and
former chair of the Israeli National Economic
Council, Eugene Kandel — decided to create Start-
Up Nation Central.
As MintPress noted earlier this year, SUNC was
founded as part of a deliberate Israeli government
effort to counter the nonviolent Boycott, Divest and
Sanctions (BDS) movement and to make Israel the
dominant global “cyber power.” This policy is aimed
at increasing Israel’s diplomatic power and
specifically undermining BDS as well as the United
Nations, which has repeatedly condemned Israel’s
government for war crimes and violations of
international law in relation to the Palestinians.
Last year, Netanyahu was asked by Fox News host
Mark Levin whether the large growth seen in recent
years in Israel’s technology sector, specifically tech
start-ups, was part of Netanyahu’s plan. Netanyahu
responded, “That’s very much my plan … It’s a very
deliberate policy.” He later added that “Israel had
technology because the military, especially military
intelligence, produced a lot of capabilities. These
incredibly gifted young men and women who come
out of the military or the Mossad, they want to
start their start-ups.”
Netanyahu again outlined this policy at the 2019
Cybertech Conference in Tel Aviv, where he stated
that Israel’s emergence as one of the top five
“cyber powers” had “required allowing this
combination of military intelligence, academia and
industry to converge in one place” and that this
further required allowing “our graduates of our
military and intelligence units to merge into
companies with local partners and foreign
partners.”
The direct tie-ins of SUNC to Israel’s government
and the successful effort led by SUNC and other
companies and organizations to place former
military intelligence and intelligence operatives in
strategic positions in major multinational
technology companies reveal that this “deliberate
policy” has had a major and undeniable impact on
the global tech industry, especially in Silicon Valley.
Mossad gets its own In-Q-Tel
This “deliberate policy” of Netanyahu’s also recently
resulted in the creation of a Mossad-run venture
capital fund that is specifically focused on financing
Israeli tech start-ups. The venture capital fund,
called Libertad, was first announced by Israel’s
Prime Minister’s Office and was created with the
explicit purpose of “increasing the Israeli
intelligence agency’s knowledge base and fostering
collaboration with Israel’s vibrant startup scene” It
was modeled after the CIA’s venture capital fund
In-Q-Tel, which invested in several Silicon Valley
companies turned government and intelligence
contractors — including Google and Palantir — with
a similar goal in mind.
Libertad declines to reveal the recipients of its
funding, but announced last December that it had
chosen five companies in the fields of robotics,
energy, encryption, web intelligence, and natural
language processing and text analysis. In regard to
its interest in web intelligence, a Mossad employee
told the Jerusalem Post that the intelligence agency
was specifically interested in “innovative
12
technologies for [the] automatic identification of
personality characteristics – personality profiling – based
on online behavior and activity, using methods based
on statistics, machine learning, and other areas.”
(emphasis added)
According to Libertad’s website, in return for its
investment, now set at NIS 2 million (~$580,000)
per year per company, “the Mossad will receive
access to the IP [initial product] developed during
R&D [Research and Development] while under
contract, and a non-commercial, non-exclusive
license to use it. Libertad’s contract with the
company will not provide it with any additional
rights.” In an interview with Calcalist Tech, Mossad
Director Yossi Cohen told the paper that the
Mossad’s partnership with civilian companies in
Israel is “excellent” and that the agency will
continue to strengthen those ties.
Israeli intelligence has a documented history in
placing “backdoors” into technology products for
the purpose of surveillance, with one well-known
case being Israel’s repurposing of the PROMIS
software, discussed in Part III of MintPress’ series
on Jeffrey Epstein. Furthermore, given that U.S.
intelligence, specifically the NSA, had “backdoors”
placed into the products of major Silicon Valley
companies (a service performed by Israeli
intelligence-linked tech companies no less), Mossad
may very well plan on doing the same with the
technology products of companies it backs through
Libertad.
Tim Shorrock, investigative journalist and author of
Spies For Hire: The Secret World of Intelligence
Outsourcing, told MintPress that the Mossad’s
continuation of such practices through Libertad was
definitely plausible, especially given what Shorrock
described as the “unusual” choice of Libertad
choosing not to release the identities of the
companies in which it invests.
“The Mossad is trying to hide what they are
investing in,” Shorrock stated, adding that
Libertad’s secrecy “raises a lot of questions”
particularly given that it was modeled after the
CIA’s In-Q-Tel. Shorrock noted that In-Q-Tel and
other venture capital funds with ties to U.S.
intelligence or the U.S. military rarely, if ever, hide
the identities of the companies they finance.
*https://www.mintpressnews.com/cia-israel-mossad-
jeffrey-epsteinorwelliannightmare/261692/?jwsource=cl
However, Libertad is merely the latest and most
public expression of the Mossad’s interest in Israeli
tech start-ups, the lion’s share of which are created
by veterans of Unit 8200 or other Israeli
intelligence agencies. Indeed, former Mossad
Director Tamir Pardo stated in 2017 that
“everyone” in the Israeli cybertechnology sector is
an “alumni” of either Israeli intelligence, like the
Mossad, or Israeli military intelligence, like Unit
8200. Pardo even went as far as to say that the
Mossad itself is “like a start-up.”
Pardo himself, after leaving his post as Mossad
director in 2016, dove straight into the world of
Israeli tech start-ups, becoming chairman of Sepio
Systems, whose two CEOs are former Unit 8200
officers. Sepio Systems’ advisory board includes
the former chief information security officer of the
CIA, Robert Bigman; former member of the U.S.
Military’s Joint Special Operations Command
(JSOC), Geoff Hancock; and former head of the
Israel National Cyber Bureau and veteran of Israeli
military intelligence, Rami Efrati. Sepio Systems’
cybersecurity software has been adopted by
several banks, telecom and insurance companies,
including in the U.S. and Brazil.
Pardo is not the only prominent figure in Israel’s
intelligence community to compare Israeli
intelligence agencies to tech start-ups. Shin Bet
Director Nadav Argaman described Israel’s
domestic spy agency in similar terms. “The Shin
Bet is like an evolving start-up, with unmatched
strength,” Argaman stated in a June 2017 speech,
as he extolled the agency’s use of “pre-crime”
technology to detain Palestinians based on their
social media activity.
Argaman, at the time, claimed that more than
2,000 Palestinians, whom he described as
“potential lone-wolf terrorists,” had been arrested
as a result of these “breakthrough technological
advances” that use artificial-intelligence algorithms
to monitor the social media accounts of
Palestinians, especially younger Palestinians, for
the use of “tripwire” phrases that have been used
by Palestinians who later committed acts of
violence. In the case of those who use such terms,
“their phones are tracked to see if they meet other
suspects, or leave their districts to move towards
potential Israeli targets. In such cases, security
forces detain the suspect,” according to a 2017
report on the practice by The Economist.
The road to fascism, paved by a corrupted PROMIS
Though Israeli intelligence’s interest in tech
companies goes back several years, there is a well-
documented history of Israeli intelligence using
bugged software to surveil and gain “backdoor”
access to government databases around the world,
particularly in the United States.
As was mentioned in Part III of MintPress’ Epstein
series, a sinister yet cunning plan was executed to
place a backdoor for Israeli intelligence into the
Prosecutor’s Management Information System
(PROMIS) software, which was then being used by
the U.S. Department of Justice and was the envy of
government agencies, particularly intelligence
agencies, around the world. This bugged version of
PROMIS — born out of the collusion between Earl
Brian, Ronald Reagan’s then-envoy to Iran, and
Rafi Eitan, then-director of the now-defunct Israeli
13
intelligence agency Lekem — was seeded around
the world by Brian’s company Hadron as well as by
Mossad-linked media mogul Robert Maxwell, father
of Jeffrey Epstein’s long-time girlfriend and alleged
madam, Ghislaine Maxwell.
After this first PROMIS “backdoor” was discovered,
Israel would again gain access to sensitive U.S.
government communications, as well as civilian
communications, thanks to the collusion between
Israeli intelligence and Israeli telecom and tech
companies, especially Amdocs and Comverse
Infosys (now Verint), that were operating
throughout the United States. Today, Unit 8200-
linked start-ups appear to have taken up the torch.
While the PROMIS software is perhaps best known
for offering Israeli intelligence a backdoor into as
many as 80 intelligence agencies and other
sensitive locations around the world for nearly a
decade, it was also used for a very different
purpose by prominent officials linked to Iran-
Contra.
One key Iran-Contra figure — Lt. Col. Oliver North,
then serving on the National Security Council —
decided to use PROMIS neither for espionage nor
for foreign policy. Instead, North turned PROMIS’
power against Americans, particularly perceived
dissidents, a fact that remained unknown for years.
Beginning in 1982, as part of the highly classified
Continuity of Government (COG) program, North
used the PROMIS software at a 6,100-square-foot
“command center” in the Department of Justice, as
well as at a smaller operations room at the White
House, to compile a list of American dissidents and
“potential troublemakers” if the COG protocol was
ever invoked.
According to a senior government official with a
high-ranking security clearance and service in five
presidential administrations who spoke to Radar in
2008, this was:
A database of Americans, who, often for the
slightest and most trivial reason, are considered
unfriendly, and who, in a time of panic might be
incarcerated. The database can identify and locate
perceived ‘enemies of the state’ almost
instantaneously.”
In 1993, Wired described North’s use of PROMIS in
compiling this database as follows:
Using PROMIS, sources point out, North could have
drawn up lists of anyone ever arrested for a
political protest, for example, or anyone who had
ever refused to pay their taxes. Compared to
PROMIS, Richard Nixon’s enemies list or Sen. Joe
McCarthy’s blacklist look downright crude.”
The COG program defined this “time of panic” as “a
national crisis, such as nuclear war, violent and
widespread internal dissent, or national opposition to a
US military invasion abroad,” whereby the government
would suspend the Constitution, declare martial
law, and incarcerate perceived dissidents and other
“unfriendlies” in order to prevent the government’s
(or then-serving administration’s) overthrow.
This secretive database has often been referred to
as “Main Core” by government insiders and, most
troubling of all, it still exists today. Journalist Christ
Ketcham, citing senior government officials,
reported in 2008 that, at that time, Main Core was
believed to contain the names of as many as 8
million Americans. Eleven years later, it is highly
likely that the number of Americans included in the
Main Core database has grown considerably.
Author and investigative journalist Tim Shorrock
also covered other disturbing aspects of the
evolution of Main Core back in 2008 for Salon. At
the time, Shorrock reported that the George W.
Bush administration was believed to have used
Main Core to guide its domestic surveillance
activities following the September 11 attacks.
Citing “several former U.S. government officials
with extensive knowledge of intelligence
operations,” Shorrock further noted that Main Core
— as it was 11 years ago at the time his report was
published — was said to contain “a vast amount of
personal data on Americans, including NSA
intercepts of bank and credit card transactions and
the results of surveillance efforts by the FBI, the
CIA and other agencies.”
Bill Hamilton, former NSA intelligence officer and
the original creator of the PROMIS software, told
Shorrock at the time that he believed that “U.S.
intelligence uses PROMIS as the primary software
for searching the Main Core database” and had
been told as much by an intelligence official in
1992 and an NSA official in 1995. Dan Murphy,
former deputy director at the CIA, had told
Hamilton that the NSA’s use of PROMIS was “so
seriously wrong that money alone cannot cure the
problem.” “I believe in retrospect that Murphy was
alluding to Main Core,” Hamilton had told
Shorrock.
Though most reporting on Main Core, from the time
its existence was first revealed to the present, has
treated the database as something used by the
U.S. government and U.S. intelligence for domestic
purposes, MintPress has learned that Israeli
intelligence was also involved with the creation of
the Main Core database. According to a former U.S.
intelligence official with direct knowledge of the
U.S. intelligence community’s use of PROMIS and
Main Core from the 1980s to 2000s, Israeli
intelligence played a role in the U.S. government’s
deployment of PROMIS as the software used for the
Main Core domestic surveillance database system.
Israeli intelligence remained involved with Main
Core at the time of the August 1991 death of
journalist Danny Casolaro, who was investigating
not only the government’s misuse of the stolen
PROMIS software but also the Main Core database.
14
This same official, who chose to remain
anonymous, told MintPress that, shortly before his
death, Casolaro had obtained copies of computer
printouts from the PROMIS-based Main Core
domestic surveillance database system from NSA
whistleblower Alan Standorf, who was found
murdered a few months before Casolaro’s lifeless
body would be found in a West Virginia hotel room.
The source also stated that Main Core’s contents
had been used for the political blackmail of
members of Congress and their staff, journalists,
and others by Walter Raymond, a senior CIA covert
operator in psyops and disinformation who served
on President Reagan’s National Security Council
during and after Main Core’s creation. If used for
this purpose by Raymond in the 1980s, Main Core
has also likely been used by other individuals with
access to the database for blackmailing purposes in
the years since.
Given that Israeli intelligence was known to have
placed a backdoor into the PROMIS software,
before it was marketed and sold around the world
by Earl Brian and Robert Maxwell, its role in the
U.S. government’s decision to use PROMIS in the
creation of Main Core suggests that Israeli
intelligence likely advocated for the version of
PROMIS containing this backdoor, thereby giving
Israeli intelligence access to Main Core. Given that
Reagan aides and officials colluded with Israeli
“spymaster” Rafi Eitan in his efforts to create a
backdoor into the software for Israeli military
intelligence, the use of this version of PROMIS in
the Main Core database is certainly plausible.
Furthermore, the fact that Israeli intelligence was
known to be involved in Main Core nearly a decade
after its creation suggests that Israeli intelligence
may have played a role in certain aspects of the
database, such as the criteria used to flag
Americans as “unfriendly,” and — like Walter
Raymond — may have used information in the
database to blackmail Americans. In addition, the
fact that the cooperation between U.S. and Israeli
intelligence, particularly between Unit 8200 and the
NSA, has only grown since 1991 further suggests
that Israeli involvement in Main Core continues to
the present.
While Main Core’s very existence is troubling for
many reasons, the alleged involvement of a foreign
intelligence service in the creation, expansion and
maintenance of a database with personal details
and potentially damaging information on millions of
Americans targeted for detention or increased
surveillance in times of crisis is chilling. It is
especially so considering that the Trump
administration’s latest proposals to prevent mass
shootings before they occur are likely to use Main
Core to flag certain Americans for increased
surveillance or potentially detention, as was done
by the George W. Bush administration following the
September 11 attacks.
It appears that Main Core serves a dual purpose;
first as a mass targeted surveillance system to
crush dissent during times of “national crisis” —
whether spontaneous or engineered — and,
second, as a massive blackmail database used to
keep every potential opponent in line during non-
emergencies.
Peter Thiel’s Seeing Stone
As was mentioned earlier in this report, Palantir —
the company co-founded by Peter Thiel — is set to
profit handsomely from the Trump administration’s
plans to use its “pre-crime” technology, which is
already used by police departments throughout the
country and also used to track Americans based on
the company’s integrative data-mining approach.
Palantir, named for the “seeing stones” in the Lord
of the Rings novels, also markets software to
foreign (and domestic) intelligence agencies that
predicts the likelihood that an individual will
commit an act of terrorism or violence.
Aside from its “pre-crime” products, Palantir has
come under fire in recent years as a result of the
company’s contracts with Immigration and
Customs Enforcement (ICE), where it created an
intelligence system known as Investigative Case
Management (ICM). The IB Times described ICM as
“a vast ‘ecosystem’ of data to help immigration
officials in identifying targets and creating cases
against them” and also “provides ICE agents with
access to databases managed by other federal
agencies.” ICM further gives ICE access to “targets’
personal and sensitive information, such as
background on schooling, employment, family
relationships, phone records, immigration history,
biometrics data, criminal records as well as home
and work addresses.” In other words, Palantir’s
ICM is essentially a “Main Core” for immigrants.
Notably, part of Oliver North’s original intentions in
“Main Core” was to track immigrants then coming
from Central America as well as Americans who
opposed Reagan era policy with respect to Central
America. At that time, Main Core was believed to
be controlled by the Federal Emergency
Management Administration (FEMA), which is now
part of the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
VICE News reported in July that the Northern
California Regional Intelligence Center, which is run
by DHS, “serves around 300 communities in
northern California and is what is known as a
‘fusion center,’ a Department of Homeland Security
intelligence center that aggregates and investigates
information from state, local, and federal agencies,
as well as some private entities, into large
databases that can be searched using software like
Palantir. “ VICE further noted that this center alone
used Palantir to surveil as many as 8 million
Ameicans. There are many more such DHS “fusion
centers” throughout the United States.
15
If the Trump administration moves forward with its
proposal of employing technology to detect
potential mass shooters before they strike,
Palantir’s technology is set to be used, given that it
has already been used by U.S. law enforcement
and U.S. intelligence to determine which people run
“the highest risk of being involved in gun violence,”
according to an investigation of Palantir by The
Verge. Furthermore, Palantir’s close ties to the
Trump administration make
the company’s role in a
future nationwide “pre-
crime” prevention system
based on technology appear
inevitable.
Palantir founder Peter Thiel listens to Trump during a meeting at Trump Tower in New York, Dec. 14, 2016. Evan Vucci | AP
Worse still is the apparent overlap between Palantir
and Main Core. Palantir — which has obvious
similarities to PROMIS — is already known to use
its software to track potential terror threats,
including domestic terror threats, and a category of
people it refers to as “subversives.” Palantir’s
tracking of these individuals “is all done using
prediction.” Palantir’s close ties to the U.S.
intelligence community suggest that Palantir may
already have access to the Main Core database.
Tim Shorrock told MintPress that Palantir’s use of
Main Core is “certainly possible,” particularly in
light of the company’s use of the term “subversive”
to describe a category of people that its software
tracks.
Palantir also has alleged ties to Israeli intelligence,
as there have long been suspicions that Israeli
intelligence has used Palantir as part of its AI “pre-
crime” algorithms targeting Palestinians after
Palantir opened a research and development (R&D)
center in Israel in 2013. The current head of
Palantir Israel, Hamultal Meridor, previously
founded a brain-machine interface organization and
was senior director of web intelligence at Verint
(formerly Comverse Infosys), which has deep
connections to Unit 8200, a history of espionage in
the United States and was one of the two
companies contracted by the NSA to insert a
“backdoor” into the U.S. telecommunications
system and popular products of major American
tech companies.
Given the above, Peter Thiel’s 2018 decision to
fund Carbyne, the Unit 8200-linked start-up that
markets itself as a technological solution to mass
shootings in the U.S., strongly suggests that Thiel
has been anticipating for some time the now-public
efforts of the Trump administration to employ “pre-
crime” technology to track and target Americans
who show signs of “mental illness” and “violent
tendencies.”
A nightmare even Orwell could not have predicted
In early August, in the wake of the shooting at an
El Paso Walmart, President Trump called on big
tech companies to collaborate with the Justice
Department in the creation of software that “stops
mass murders before they start” by detecting
potential mass shooters before they cnm act.
Though Trump’s ideas were short on specifics,
there is now a new proposal that would create a
new government agency that will use data
gathered from civilian electronic devices to identify
“neurobehavioral” warning signs, thereby flagging
“potential shooters” for increased surveillance and
potentially detention.
This new agency, as proposed by the foundation
led by former NBC Universal president and vice
chairman of General Electric Robert Wright, would
be known as the Health Advanced Research
Projects Agency (HARPA) and would be modeled
after the Defense Advanced Research Projects
Agency (DARPA). Per the proposal, recently
detailed by the Washington Post, the flagship
program of HARPA would be “Safe Home”
(Stopping Aberrant Fatal Events by Helping
Overcome Mental Extremes), which would use
“breakthrough technologies with high specificity
and sensitivity for early diagnosis of
neuropsychiatric violence,” specifically “advanced
analytical tools based on artificial intelligence and
machine learning.”
The program would cost an estimated $60 million
over four years and would use data from “Apple
Watches, Fitbits, Amazon Echo and Google Home”
and other consumer electronic devices, as well as
information provided by health-care providers to
identify who may be a threat.
The Washington Post reported that President
Trump has reacted “very positively” to the proposal
and that he was “sold on the concept.” The Post
also noted that Wright sees the president’s
daughter, Ivanka, as “the most effective champion
of the proposal and has previously briefed her on
HARPA himself.” Ivanka has previously been cited
as a driving force behind some of her father’s policy
decisions, including his decision to bomb Syria after
an alleged chemical weapons attack in 2017.
Liz Fed — president of the Susan Wright
Foundation, which is led by Robert Wright and
created the proposal for HARPA and “Safe Home” —
told The Post that the proposal emulated DARPA
because “DARPA is a brilliant model that works.
They have developed the most transformational
capabilities in the world for national security…We’re
not leveraging the tools and technologies available
to us to improve and save lives.” Fed further
asserted that DARPA’s technological approach had
yet to be applied to the field of healthcare.
For anyone familiar with DARPA, such claims should
immediately sound loud alarm bells, especially
since DARPA is already developing its own solution
16
to “mental health” issues in the form of a “brain-
machine interface” as part of its N3 program. That
program, according to reports, involves
“noninvasive and ‘minutely’ invasive neural
interfaces to both read and write into the brain,”
help distance soldiers “from the emotional guilt of
warfare” by “clouding their perception” and “to
program artificial memories of fear, desire, and
experiences directly into the brain.” Though N3 is
intended to improve the prowess of American
soldiers, it is also set to be used as a means of
pursuing DARPA’s Systems-Based Neurotechnology
for Emerging Therapies (SUBNETS) project, which
aims to “to develop a tiny, implanted chip in the
skull to treat psychiatric disorders such as anxiety,
PTSD and major depression.”
Given that HARPA’s lead scientific adviser is Dr. Geoffrey Ling, former director and founder of DARPA’s Biological Technologies Office (BTO), which “merges biology,
engineering, and computer science to harness the power of natural systems for national security,” it seems likely that DARPA’s neurological-focused research programs,
like SUBNETS and N3, would be folded into HARPA’s portfolio, making the proposed agency’s approach to mental health very questionable indeed.
Aside from the dystopian nature of both DARPA and potentially HARPA’s approach to mental health, there is grave cause for concern regarding the Trump administration’s moves to address U.S. mass shooting
events by implementing pre-crime technology based on artificial intelligence, data-mining and mass surveillance,
technologies already laying in wait thanks to companies like Palantir and numerous Israeli tech start-ups led by
former Unit 8200 officers.
With companies like Carbyne — with its ties to both the Trump administration and to Israeli intelligence — and
the Mossad-linked Gabriel also marketing themselves as “technological” solutions to mass shootings while also doubling as covert tools for mass data collection and extraction, the end result is a massive surveillance
system so complete and so dystopian that even George Orwell himself could not have predicted it.
Following another catastrophic mass shooting or crisis event, aggressive efforts will likely follow to foist these “solutions” on a frightened American public by the very network connected, not only to Jeffrey Epstein, but to a litany of crimes and a frightening history of plans to
crush internal dissent and would-be dissenters in the United States.
Whitney Webb is a MintPress News journalist based in
Chile. She has contributed to several independent media outlets including Global Research, EcoWatch, the Ron Paul Institute and 21st Century Wire, among others. She has made several radio and television appearances and is the 2019 winner of the Serena Shim Award for Uncompromised Integrity in Journalism.
Republish our stories! MintPress News is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-
ShareAlike 3.0 International License.
* https://www.mintpressnews.com/cia-israel-mossad-
jeffrey-epstein-orwellian-nightmare/261692/
________________________________________________
The power and hypocrisy of George
Pell’s supporters Edition No. 267 August 24 – 30, 2019
As the Victorian Court of Appeal affirms the cardinal’s guilt, he retains dogged support from many in the conservative establishment. By Richard Cooke.
In an age when even amateur broadcasters can attain professional production values, few telecasts still look as
spartan as a real-life court proceeding. In prelude, the live feed from the Victorian Supreme Court presented only three empty seats, a state seal and a test soundtrack of tinkling piano music. As the judges filled those seats, the court website became inundated with viewers and crashed. Once restored, the video sometimes chopped or slowed under the weight of this
absent audience. Chief Justice Anne Ferguson’s delivery of the summary was halting as well – The Saturday Paper’s legal correspondent, Richard Ackland, tweeted that she brought “all the drama of a dead wombat to reading a summary of one of the most important criminal judgments of the year” – but this dour diction was, in its
way, more compelling than a mannered performance might have been. The ruling Ferguson delivered was brief, clear and surprising – George Pell’s appeal on child sexual assault charges had failed.
“It is fair to say that his case has divided the community,” said Ferguson, and so it divided the court. There were three grounds of appeal. One was that the
defence had been unable to submit an animation, since nicknamed “the Pac-Man video”, purporting to show that
the offending inside St Patrick’s Cathedral, Melbourne,
was impossible. This was dismissed unanimously.
So, too, was concern that Pell’s not guilty plea had been entered via video link only, and not in the presence of
the jury. But on the most important question, of whether an “unsafe verdict” had been delivered, there was dissent. Justice Weinberg felt the evidence of the complainant, upon which the case hinged, was not satisfactory enough to preclude reasonable doubt. His colleagues disagreed. They found “A”, as he was called in the summary, was “not a liar, was not a fantasist and
was a witness of the truth”. It was reasonable for the jury to believe him.
The microphones recorded only silence from the gallery, and it was possible to forget the rest of those present: the press and lawyers, the survivors and supporters, and Cardinal Pell himself – he is not yet Mr Pell – who had
arrived to court in a prison van, and would leave by the same means. Depending on their vantage point, court reporters said Pell “barely reacted” to the ruling, was “gripping the dock with his left hand and looking down at the floor”, looked “destroyed” or merely pursed his lips. Abuse survivors thanked the Lord for a decision many thought even more consequential than the cardinal’s
earlier guilty verdict.
Media and legal circles had tipped a different result, partly because of matters of law, and partly because of a cruder calculus – that elite power is so seldom brought to lasting accountability. There might yet be another appeal to the High Court by special leave, but “A”, or Witness J as he is better known, has already run an unusually long
17
and vigorous gauntlet. He waited many years to speak to police, only doing so when the other choirboy abused by
Pell died of a heroin overdose. It was at his former schoolfriend’s funeral that he decided to seek justice. As other cases prepared against Pell fell away, it was his
that proceeded to trial. The first jury was unable to deliver a verdict. The second believed his version of events over the cardinal’s. Now two Supreme Court justices have made the same determination.
Ferguson stressed the court’s decision was not a mere matter of law: it was a matter of fact. The judges had consulted the same evidence as the jury, so they could decide whether those 12 citizens were in a position to render a safe verdict. The Court of Appeal had reviewed many hours of video testimony and cross-examination and visited the sacristy and the corridor where the
offending took place. In particular, they closely examined vestments identical to the ones Pell was wearing on the date of the crimes. These items of clothing had also been available to the jury, and the defence had imbued them
with almost otherworldly qualities, pretending they were impervious to shifting or parting by human hands once
donned. Not surprisingly, both the jury and judges discovered that these garments were entirely ordinary, not de facto chastity belts.
But the defence was only doing what it could, and after the verdict was upheld, Witness J had a statement delivered, via a representative, in which he was magnanimous. Few witnesses cross-examined by a silk
who costs $20,000 a day are thankful for the experience. Witness J is an exception. “I am glad he has had the best legal representation that money can buy,” the statement said of Pell’s team. “There are a lot of checks and balances in the criminal justice system and the appeals process is one of them.” Witness J also reserved some misgivings for “commentators” and “punditries”. His
words for Pell’s defenders outside the courtroom could have been unkinder still. Some lay Catholics will not believe the verdict, but some lay Catholics once decided a Coogee fence post contained a divine presence: the ordinary faithful should not be judged too harshly. Those “commentators” are less deserving of mercy.
Australia’s conservative organs have almost all embraced a mythology, by turns unhinged and incoherent, that seeks to turn Pell from an offender into a martyr. Before the summary was even publicly available, columnists were filing stories that decried a miscarriage of justice. This followed a pattern established long before the guilty verdict. In The Australian, John Ferguson indulged his
talent for melodrama by suggesting Anne Ferguson had delivered a “death sentence”. Did Pell’s condemners not
know the door of the sacristy was unlocked? The appeal judges noted that other similar cases of abuses had occurred in places that carried a high risk of discovery. Did they not know the robes were heavy? The judges had, of course, tried them on. Did they not know Pell had
never been accused before? In fact, accusations have followed him his whole career – the church itself had already conducted a 2002 investigation into groping claims.
Still they harped on about the cardinal’s role in the Melbourne Response, a “world-first innovation” in the
Catholic Church’s response to child abuse. Pell was establishing it at almost the exact time he was raping choirboys. Was it really conceivable he should be leading the charge against child abuse, and committing it at the
same time? Well, yes. Among survivor groups, the Response quickly became notorious for its mean-
spiritedness and tight-fistedness. It spent substantially more on lawyers than it did on compensation. While fighting a claim made by an abused altar boy, John Ellis,
the church made a novel and successful legal argument to limit payouts – as a legal entity it does not exist, and so cannot be sued. The Melbourne Response was not a good-faith effort to deal with child abuse in the church: it
simulated action, while stymieing it at the same time. It also gave an abuser a smokescreen.
It was the same institutions that turned the conservative
establishment Catholic and incubated an unparalleled
epidemic of child sexual abuse. As power grew, so did
abuse, abetted by a deference to authority and the rites
of tradition.
In the world of Pell’s defenders, it is not the church that has conducted biased investigations, but the police. And the venom ordinarily aimed at offenders is instead
directed at the journalists who reported on them. A
conspiracy theory combines the two. After the appeal, an anonymous poster on the libertarian blog Catallaxy Files wrote that “the degree of joint enterprise by Victoria Police and the ABC is not known at this time”, calling them “conjoined twins”. The theory goes that the police, exhibiting a previously unexhibited anti-Catholic animus,
trawled for victims, and then the ABC, through 7.30 reporter Louise Milligan, brain-poisoned the jury. No proof or evidence of this “enterprise” is offered or required: the conviction of the cardinal is by itself proof positive. Even this theory is more reality-based than that favoured by Quadrant, though, where Keith Windschuttle is blaming the whole episode on American-based
reporting by Rolling Stone magazine.
There is a temptation to write off such sentiments as
skunk spray emitted in self-defence, but these are not isolated ideologues. A more finessed version of the same – “What we have witnessed is a combined effort by much of the media, including Australia’s public broadcaster, and elements of Victoria’s law enforcement agency, to
systematically blacken the name of someone before he went to trial” – has been offered by the vice-chancellor of the Australian Catholic University, Greg Craven. Craven instructed his staff not to comment on the trial until all avenues of appeal had been exhausted, then provided a personal character reference for Pell and authored a
post-conviction column in The Catholic Weekly headlined “Poisoning the well of justice”. The Pell Centre at the ACU’s Ballarat campus retains its name, and the staff muzzle remains in place.
Like many of his ilk, Craven cannot restrict himself to a single epithet when referencing Milligan’s book, Cardinal. It is a “hopelessly biased, ill-written, ungrammatical and
poorly proof-read volume”. In the time since the book was commissioned by Melbourne University Press, the university’s chancellor, Allan Myers, QC, derided MUP’s tendency to publish “airport trash”, opening a rift with the MUP board that saw four of its directors resign in January. Myers had previously represented Pell as counsel.
Even by the low and gendered standards of Australian public life, the attacks on Milligan, the only journalist to meet and interview Witness J, have been extraordinary. The book resulted in Milligan herself being cross-examined for six-and-a-half hours, during which Pell’s
18
counsel, Robert Richter, suggested she had flirted with an accuser during an interview. “I think it is an
absolutely sexist assertion,” she responded.
“Without a doubt this is the toughest story I have ever done,” Milligan later told the ABC. “This is a person who
had immense political and cultural power so taking that on is enormous and very, very stressful… Being at the centre of this storm, it doesn’t get any harder than that as a journalist.” Echoing this duress, the reporter who
broke the story of the Pell police investigation in the Herald Sun, Lucie Morris-Marr, said the effort had “nearly destroyed” her, and that she had been through “hell”. Andrew Bolt, her own paper’s columnist, tried to undermine her scoop by falsely claiming it had originated with a police leak, a “leak” that was subsequently referred to an anti-corruption investigation. Morris-Marr
made an internal complaint about the Bolt column and claims News Corp responded by pushing her out. Just months after she produced a world-first exclusive, Morris-Marr was told there was “no money” left for her
contract.
Pell himself was a columnist for The Sunday Telegraph,
and a friend of News’s proprietor, Rupert Murdoch. There have been suggestions this close relationship may have prompted Bolt’s about-face on the cardinal, which had once been far more critical. When Pell gave evidence about the Ballarat paedophile Gerald Ridsdale to the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Bolt wrote that the testimony would “stain
his reputation forever” and that Pell would be remembered as “the priest who went by the book, not the heart”. Bolt then changed his mind and conducted an exclusive interview with Pell on Sky News. This is not evidence of an enterprise, however, and as so often with the Murdoch empire, no direct instruction is required. It is more indicative of the changing cultural and religious
currents at the heart of conservatism, without which the reaction to the Pell case cannot be understood.
“ ‘Catholicism’ is now a dirty word in Australia,” wrote
Paul Collins in the National Catholic Reporter, “and as in most Anglophone countries there’s deep-seated sectarian bigotry against Catholics which surfaces in times like these.” But for anyone familiar with Australian history, it was the diminishing of sectarian bigotry that was noteworthy. The old divisions that had defined other famous Australian legal matters, such as the divorce case
of the Test cricketer Arthur Coningham, who attended court armed with a revolver and the support of the Orange Order, were gone. So was any Protestant crowing. Only the trial’s title kept a vestige of the old animosity between Windsor and Rome: George Pell v The
Queen.
As late as 1950, publications as anodyne as The Methodist called the battle between Catholicism and Protestantism in Australia an unceasing “war”, that would continue “as long as men are even partially free, and as long as they retain an interest in the vital things of the Christian faith”. By the 1970s, the war was virtually over, the two sects declaring an ecumenical truce to combat
secularism and socialism. Australia also took a different direction from the United States in this mid-century
period. There, legal challenges enforced increasing secularisation of the publicly funded school system. Here,
by contrast, the state began funding Catholic institutions in earnest. Controversies over the Eucharist and the order of precedence feel antiquated now, but the
ambivalence, scepticism and outright hostility that greeted the foundation institutions, such as the ACU, have lodged in folk memory.
After centuries as a bullied minority, Catholicism now has
more adherents in Australia than Anglicanism, and the ruling Liberal Party has changed its predilections, from culturally Protestant into culturally Catholic. These reversals were once unthinkable, and the conservative Catholic ascendancy is at the core of the Pell response. Because it was the same institutions, operating in the same mode of fresh ambition, that turned the
conservative establishment Catholic and simultaneously incubated an unparalleled epidemic of child sexual abuse. As power grew, so did abuse, abetted by a deference to authority and the rites of tradition.
This is why Pell’s conviction has been so humiliating not only for the church, but also for the Australian
conservative establishment more generally. Often Pell is referred to as “the third-highest ranked priest in the Vatican”, but this overlooks the prelates’ place in international right-wing hierarchy. He joins a select few Australians to attain a level of first-rank international success. In the political realm, only Rupert Murdoch matches him, and they have the simpatico relations of
two men meeting in the middle – in the Murdoch papers, Pell broke with church doctrine on global warming; Murdoch, the grandson of a Presbyterian minister, was awarded a papal knighthood for his “unblemished character”. Both Murdoch and his close friend Robert Thomson, the chief executive of News Corp, are not Catholic converts but they are raising their children as
Catholics.
These changes cannot be reversed or apologised for. They can only be double or tripled down on, and in some quarters the accusations register only as a new retelling of an old canard: that the Roman church is riddled with sex crimes, refuses to succumb to secular law and
operates schools for nefarious purposes. Accountability, like truth, will take time to sink in. Those charges are defended against almost reflexively, and with new allies.
But the facts, when stated, are stark. George Pell’s Wikipedia entry now begins like this: “George Pell AC (born 8 June 1941) is an Australian convicted
child sex offender and prelate of the Catholic Church”. The most imminent
edit is the removal of that “AC”.
This article was first published in the print edition of The Saturday Paper on Aug 24, 2019 as "The power and hypocrisy of George Pell’s supporters". Subscribe here.
Richard Cooke is a contributing editor to The Monthly, and the Mumbrella Publish Award Columnist of the Year.
*https://www.thesaturdaypaper.com.au/news/politics/2019/08/24/the-power-and-hypocrisy-george-pells-supporters/15665688008647
__________________________________________________ The following illustrates how democratic Germany treats its Nationalist Holocaust Questioners, but remember Germany still does not have a PEACE TREATY that would end WWII hostilities, and is thus technically still at war with major and minor global national players.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
19
September 1, 1939 - Outbreak of World War II On September 1, 1939, Hitler invaded Poland from the west; two days later, France and Britain declared
war on Germany, beginning World War II. On September 17, Soviet troops invaded Poland from the east. =============================================================
Ursula Haverbeck, 90, and Horst Mahler, 83, sit in prison for denying the “Holocaust”, i.e. denying the existence of the homicidal gas chambers; the actual law rejects “Holocaust” as a legal term and defines §130 as “defaming the memory of the dead”. Note, only the non-German dead are to be remembered while Germany’s Bundeskanzler floods Germany & Europe with criminal invaders who receive free housing/welfare benefits, thereby fulfilling ther European Union’s imperative to turn the continent into a multi-cultural entity, i.e. the racial European
genocide program. ------------------------------------------------------------------
We refuse to be a ‘normal country’ if it means US-style bombings & invasions, Moscow tells Pentagon
Otherwise, we should have been acting like the US, bombing Iraq and Libya in blatant violation of
international law… We should have supported coups, violent and anti-constitutional, like the US and its
closest allies did in February 2014 [in Ukraine]. - Published time: 9 Sep, 2019 16:04
* https://www.rt.com/news/468423-pentagon-russia-normal-country
----------------------------------------------------------------------
SOME TRIVIA …
Breck Dumas , August 16, 2019
Swedish teen's 'zero-
carbon yacht' trip to
New York is not so
green after all.It's
been revealed that
trans-Atlantic flights
will be required for
the crew
Kirsty Wigglesworth -
WPA Pool/Getty Images
Sixteen-year-old Swedish eco-campaigner Greta Thunberg is currently on her way across the Atlantic ocean on a zero-carbon
yacht, headed for New York to address the United Nations regarding climate change policy. But the two-week voyage that's been widely-hailed for its environmentally-friendly mode of travel has now fallen under scrutiny, as it has been revealed that carbon-guzzling trans-Atlantic flights will be utilized by the boat's crew for the round trip.
What are the details? Miss Thunberg has garnered international attention for environmental initiatives, and was even nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in March. She told The New York Times ahead of her journey across the ocean on the boat Maliza II, "By doing this it also shows how impossible it is today to live sustainable. That, in order to travel with zero emissions, that we have to sail like this across the Atlantic Ocean." Apparently, it's even more impossible to travel without a carbon footprint than some might have imagined. The Times of London revealed Friday that Thunberg's solar-powered yacht trip "may generate more emissions than it saves because of flights taken by the crew."
The Times reported that two sailors will be flying into New York to man the 60-foot vessel back to Europe, and two of the crew members currently on the yacht may fly home. According to a spokeswoman for Team Mazila, "We added the trip to New York City at very short notice, and as a result two people need to fly over to the U.S. in order to bring the boat back," the Daily Mail reported. "The world has not yet found a way to make it possible to cross an ocean without a carbon footprint."
Anything else? Thunberg has been campaigning for all countries to "cut emissions in line with the Paris climate accord," CBS News reported. When the teenager was asked if she would be open to meeting with President Donald Trump during her visit to the U.S., she said, "Why should I waste time talking to him when he, of course, is not going to listen to me?" * https://www.theblaze.com/news/swedish-teens-zero-carbon-yacht-trip-to-new-york-is-not-so-green-after-all
________________________________________________
20
ES GEHT JETZT UM ALLES!
von Gerd Ittner
Etwas geht vor in diesem Land, eine ganz neue, ganz
eigenartige Stimmung breitet sich aus, und möglicherweise
bahnt sich ein ganz entscheidender Umschwung an: Immer
mehr Menschen wachen jetzt auf und haben das Gefühl, daß
etwas ganz und gar nicht stimmt in und mit dieser BRD. "Kann
es sein, daß wir seit 1945 derart ausgeplündert,
ausgenommen, hintergangen, übervorteilt, entrechtet,
aber vor allem so BELOGEN und BETROGEN wurden und
werden, wie noch kein anderes Volk auf dieser Erde", so
fragen sie sich. Sie beginnen, die Dinge um die BRD immer
weiter zu hinterfragen - gerade auch deshalb, weil sie für sich
erkannt haben, daß die "Lügenpresse", welche die Dinge in einer
entsprechenden Weise darstellt und sie manipulierend verdreht,
tatsächlich eine Lügenpresse ist, und die Politik eine solche des
Volksbetrugs und Volksverrats. (Eine Politik, welche doch dem
Wohl des Volkes, des DEUTSCHEN VOLKES dienen sollte, die
aber bereits den Begriff des "Volkes", und gar des "Deutschen
Volkes" überhaupt nicht mehr verwendet, ihn tabuisiert und
regelrecht kriminalisiert und nur noch von "Bevölkerung" und
"Gesellschaft" spricht.)
Jene sich der Denknarkose durch Umerziehung und
Dauerbekeulung mit Totschlagbegriffen ("Rechter", "Nazi",
"Reichsbürger" etc.) entzogen habenden Wachdeutschen stellen
Fragen hinsichtlich der Legitimation der BRD. Sie fragen sich, ob
die BRD wirklich ihr Staat ist, ob diese überhaupt ein Staat im
eigentlichen Sinne ist. Das wird von der Lügenpresse hetzerisch
verdreht in, daß diese Aufgewachten und Fragen Stellenden
behaupteten, die BRD würde nicht existieren. Doch das
behaupten diese nicht - es geht wie gesagt um die Frage der
Legitimation der BRD, darum, wie diese und als was eigentlich
sie existiert, und ob sie unterdessen nicht vielleicht in
enscheidenden Bereichen zum "Gegenentwurf" dessen geworden
ist, für was das Grundgesetz und die BRD dereinst geschaffen
wurden: nämlich einzig und allein für das DEUTSCHE VOLK,
mit dem Auftrag ihrer, des Besatzungskonstrukts Auflösung,
durch die Wiederherstellung der staatlichen Einheit und
Handlungsfähigkeit des Deutschen Reiches, einschließlich
seines Staatsgebietes jenseits von Oder und Neiße, und
einer Verfassungsgebung durch das DEUTSCHE VOLK in
freier Selbstbestimmung gemäß des Artikels 146 des unter
Fremdbestimmung entstandenen Besatzungsstatuts
Grundgesetz - wohlgemerkt nicht "der", sondern "für" die -
Bundesrepublik Deutschland.
Und das System wird unruhig... Es reagiert immer hysterischer
und brutaler gegenüber Menschen, welche völlig gewaltlos
dissidente Ansichten vertreten, welche die Dinge hinterfragen.
(Mich hat man sogar - widersinniger geht es nicht mehr - wegen
des Äußerns in der BRD unerwünschter Ansichten gewaltsam
aus dem Ausland hierher geholt! Also ausgerechnet dorthin, wo
die von mir vertretenen Ansichten doch nicht erwünscht sind...)
Man hat eigens ein Etikett erfunden, um es Menschen zu
verpassen, welche herauszufinden versuchen und auch
herausgefunden haben, was mit der BRD nicht stimmt - dieses
Etikett heißt "Reichsbürger"
"Wie gefährlich sind Reichsbürger?", schlagzeilt die Hetz- und
Lügenpresse dauerthemamäßig. Doch "Wie gefährlich sind
Asylbewerber und Migranten?", diese Schlagzeile liest man dort
nie, auch wenn Deutsche von solchen in einer vordem im Alltag
hierzulande nie gekannten Brutalität und Anzahl abgeschlachtet,
niedergemetzelt, vergewaltigt, zu Krüppeln geschlagen,
ausgeraubt, beleidigt, bespuckt und gedemütigt werden, wenn
Deutsche, und selbst Kinder, von ins Land des Deutschen Volkes
gekommenen Mördern in Bahnhöfen vor Züge gestoßen werden
und damit ganzen Familien das Leben für immer zerstört wird!
Diesbezüglich bleibt es ganz leise und sehr verhalten im
Lügenblätterwald des antideutschen Schmierenjournalismus.
Aber wehe, wehe, wehe, ein Deutscher sagt ein politisch nicht
"korrektes" Wort... Doch die sich von diesem Betrieb noch
nicht völlig verblöden lassen habenden Menschen im
Lande bemerken das durchaus! Und immer mehr
erkennen, was hier gespielt wird. Ein blutiges,
mörderisches Spiel zulasten eines ganzen Volkes!
Besonders beliebt bei jener Journaille ist es, nicht
selbsternannten, sondern von den Systemmedien so genannten
"Reichsbürgern" Aussagen zu unterstellen, um diese dann
vermeintlich zu "widerlegen".
Aber was haben diese Medien und deren "Experten" zu einer
nachprüfbaren Rechtslage zu sagen - zum Beispiel zur
deutschen Staatsangehörigkeit? Wie heißt diese denn
KONKRET, mit dem vollen Namen des sie bildenden
Staates, wenn eine Staatsangehörigkeit der BRD nun
einmal nicht existiert? Und auch nicht existieren kann, da mit
der BRD laut Parlamentarischem Rat ganz ausdrücklich kein
neuer, anderer Staat (als eben das völkerrechtlich
fortbestehende Deutsche Reich) gegründet wurde, sondern
lediglich ein Teil des deutschen Staates (Deutsches Reich) neu
organisiert wurde; und da die deutsche Staatsangehörigkeit
ausdrücklich die von vor der Schaffung der BRD fortbestehende
ist; und da diese deutsche Staatsangehörigkeit gemäß Artikel
116 Abs. 1 des Grundgesetzes räumlich vom Staatsgebiet des
Deutschen Reiches in den Grenzen vom 31. Dezember 1937*
bestimmt wird, welches ja nie zur BRD gehörte.
Vor allem aber: Woher sollte die bei fehlendem Friedensvertrag
und nicht gestrichenen Feindstaatenklauseln dem erklärten
Feindstaatenbündnis gegen Deutschland und das
Deutsche Volk beigetretene BRD(!) das Recht nehmen
wollen, Deutsche Menschen für sich zu "beschlagnahmen", die
sich mit dem vollen Recht der freien Selbstbestimmung und der
Rechtslage entsprechend darauf berufen, keine
Staatsangehörigkeit der BRD zu haben und mithin keine
Staatsangehörigen der BRD zu sein, und die der BRD
insbesondere auch keinen Treueid geleistet haben, sich
ihr gegenüber niemals zur Loyalität, zum Gehorsam und
zur Gefolgschaft verpflichtet haben?
Die Zeiten der Leibeigenschaft sind vorbei!
Wenn die - sich gerade auch aus dem Grundgesetz für die BRD
ergebende - Rechtslage erst entsprechend bewußtseinsbildend
bekannt wird im Deutschen Volk, dann wird es "eng" für die
Absichten werden, dieses Volk weiterhin mit einer
Staatssimulation zum Narren und unter Fremdherrschaft halten
(und durch eine "Replacement Migration" als solches
abschaffen) zu wollen.
So will man 1990 eine "Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands"
durchgeführt haben, welche rechtlich definiert ist als "Beitritt
des Gebietes der DDR zum Geltungsbereich des Grundgesetzes
am 3. Oktober 1990". Das heißt: dieser Beitritt ist niemals
rechtswirksam durchgeführt worden und konnte unter den
gegebenen Umständen auch nicht rechtswirksam durchgeführt
werden, da der Geltungsbereich des Grundgesetzes,
Artikel 23, am 3. Oktober 1990 überhaupt nicht mehr
existierte! Er war bereits vorher gestrichen, und das im
Bundesgesetzblatt verkündet worden. Selbstverständlich aber
kann einem am 3. Oktober 1990 nicht mehr bestehenden
Geltungsbereich des Grundgesetzes am 3. Oktober 1990
21
auch nicht mehr rechtswirksam beigetreten werden! Eine
Tatsache, die sich auch von "Experten" der BRD nicht
wegschwätzen läßt.
Doch selbst mit einem rechtswirksamen Beitritt
Mitteldeutschlands zum Geltungsbereich des Grundgesetzes der
BRD wäre der konstituierende, unabänderliche und
unaufgebbare Wiedervereinigungsauftrag desselben nicht
erfüllt gewesen. Denn wenn das Grundgesetz den
konstituierenden, unabänderlichen und unaufgebbaren Auftrag
zur Wiedervereinigung des ganzen Deutschlands gibt, dann
muß diesem Grundgesetz zur Umsetzung dieses Auftrags
auch zwingend eine Stelle mitgegeben worden sein, der
zu entnehmen ist, welches territoriale Gebiet das
Grundgesetz überhaupt unter dem
wiederzuvereinigenden ganzen Deutschland versteht. Und
die einzige Stelle im gesamten Grundgesetz, die das zu leisten
vermag, ist der Artikel 116 Abs. 1 - er nennt das Gebiet des
Deutschen Reiches in den Grenzen vom 31. Dezember 1937.
Und damit ist dieses das vom Grundgesetz gemeinte
Wiedervereinigungsgebiet des ganzen Deutschlands!
Es gibt im Grundgesetz keine andere Stelle als den Artikel 116
Abs. 1, der zu entnehmen wäre, welches räumliche deutsche
Staatsgebiet dieses mit seinem konstituierenden,
unabänderlichen und unaufgebbaren
Wiedervereinigungsauftrag meint. Insbesondere auch hat
das in diesem Gebiet wiederzuvereinigende deutsche Staatsvolk
laut Grundgesetz Artikel 116 Abs. 1 völlig offenkundig die
Staatsangehörigkeit des Deutschen Reiches (zumal eine
Staatsangehörigkeit der BRD nun einmal nie geschaffen wurde
und somit nicht existiert), räumlich definiert vom Staatsgebiet
des Deutschen Reiches in den Grenzen vom 31. Dezember
1937!
Und um eben das aus dem Bewußtsein des Deutschen Volkes zu
tilgen, bzw. um es ihm überhaupt nicht erst zu Bewußtsein
gelangen zu lassen, wurde 1990 der Geltungsbereich des
Grundgesetzes, Artikel 23, in überstürzter Hast um das
Verwischen von Spuren Bemühter aus dem Grundgesetz
gestrichen - aberwitzigerweise noch bevor das Gebiet der DDR
diesem Geltungsbereich beitreten sollte -, da dieser Artikel 23
hinsichtlich der Wiedervereinigung von den ANDEREN
TEILEN Deutschlands (nämlich den von den Grenzen des
Deutschen Reiches vom 31. Dezember 1937 umfaßten)
sprach, nicht lediglich vom ANDEREN TEIL Deutschlands
(der DDR)!
Somit ist ganz eindeutig offenkundig, welches ungeheuerliche
Hochverrats- und Betrugsverbrechen gegenüber dem
Deutschen Volk und seinem rechtmäßigen Staat - dem
Deutschen Reich - (aber auch gegenüber dem Grundgsetz und
seinem Wiedervereinigungsauftrag für das gesamte
Deutschland) 1990 begangen wurde und seither begangen
wird, indem man eine noch dazu niemals rechtswirksam
vollzogene, ledigliche Teilwiedervereinigung Westdeutschlands
mit Mitteldeutschland als Wiedervereinigung
Gesamtdeutschlands, als Erfüllung des sich aber eben gemäß
dieses Grundgesetzes ganz klar auf das Staatsgebiet des
Deutschen Reiches in den Grenzen vom 31. Dezember 1937
beziehenden konstituierenden, unabänderlichen und
unaufgebbaren Wiedervereinigungsauftrages ausgibt.
Doch immer mehr Deutsche wachen auf und durchschauen das
üble Spiel...
Mit reichs- und volkstreuen Grüßen
Gerd Ittner
* Zur Erläuterung: Das Staatsgebiet des Deutschen Reiches in
den Grenzen vom 31. Dezember 1937 ist dasjenige, welches
das Grundgesetz für die BRD selber nennt (also von wegen
das käme von den "Reichsbürgern"); völkerrechtlich stehen
allerdings auch andere Grenzverläufe des Deutschen
Reiches im Raum und zur Diskussion. Jedoch handelt es sich
hier um eine Frage, welche gegebenenfalls erst nach der
Wiederherstellung der Handlungsfähigkeit des Deutschen
Reiches von diesem selber mit dem dazu nötigen
Verhandlungsgewicht angegangen werden kann. Für jetzt ist es
unbedingt wichtig, um diese Dinge zu wissen, und sich
hinsichtlich dessen, was man selber praktisch umsetzen kann,
bewußt zu sein, daß die BRD nicht Deutschland, nicht unser
Deutschland ist. Vor allem ist von entscheidender Bedeutung,
daß eine Staatsangehörigkeit der BRD nicht existiert!
[http://rsv.daten-web.de/Germanien/keine_BRD-
Staatsbuergerschaft_LK_Demmin.pdf]
Daraus folgt: Wenn die BRD über keine eigene
Staatsangehörigkeit verfügt, verfügt sie klarerweise und
logisch zwingend auch über keinen einzigen eigenen
Staatsangehörigen und über kein eigenes Staatsvolk!
Hier ist der Hebel, an dem jeder einzelne ansetzen kann und im
Sinne nicht nur seiner freien Selbstbestimmung, sondern auch
der Selbsterhaltung (gegenüber einer Politik zur Abschaffung
Deutschlands und des Deutschen Volkes) ansetzen muß. - Das
heißt: Besteht gegenüber "Behörden" etc. der BRD darauf, daß
Ihr keine Staatsangehörigkeit der BRD habt und damit
keine Staatsangehörigen der BRD seid, und auch niemals
sein wollt - daß Ihr Euch von dieser nicht wie Leibeigene
als vermeintlich deren Staatsangehörige beschlagnahmen
und behandeln laßt! Macht geltend, daß Ihr der BRD
niemals einen Treueid geleistet habt; daß Ihr Euch der
BRD und deren Vertetern gegenüber nie in einer
Erklärung zur Loyalität, zur Gefolgschaft und zum
Gehorsam verpflichtet habt!
Vor allem: Bleibt in diesem mit unbeugsamem Willen und
Hartnäckigkeit im zivilen Ungehorsam zu führenden
Freiheits- und Befreiungskampf unbedingt gewaltlos! Geht
dem immer angeschlagener und wackeliger werdenden, und
deshalb immer wütender, hysterischer und brutaler um sich
schlagenden System nicht in die Gewaltfalle, welche dieses auch
durch von ihm installierte Provokateure und Anstifter auslegt.
Es müssen alle Alarmglocken läuten, wenn Euch jemand zu
gewalttätigen Aktionen überreden will. Der Gegner ist
materiell absolut übermächtig - wir können ihn nur mit
den Waffen schlagen, die ihm in seiner Verderbtheit,
Verlogenheit und Niedertracht nicht zur Verfügung
stehen: mit den Waffen des Geistes und innerer
Aufrichtigkeit!
Tretet dem System entgegen, als freie, selbstbestimmte
Deutsche Menschen, gewaltlos aber mit einem
entschlossenen und unbeugsamen "NEIN" zur BRD - denn
niemand hat das Recht, schon gleich gar keine BRD ohne
eigene Staatsangehörigkeit und damit ohne einen
einzigen eigenen Staatsangehörigen, freien
selbstbestimmten Deutschen Menschen vorzuschreiben,
zu was sie "ja", und zu was sie "nein" sagen dürfen! -
Diese Zeiten sind vorbei!
Im Jahre 2015, seit nunmehr vier Jahren, hat das "Merkel-
Regime" mit der grundgesetzwidrigen Flutungsöffnung der
Grenzen nicht nur das Deutsche Volk einer seither in deren
Brutalität und tagtäglichen Gegenwärtigkeit immer noch mehr
ausartenden Gewaltkriminalität durch viel zu oft illegal und
bereits dadurch als Straftäter in dessen Land kommende
angebliche "Schutzsuchende" ausgeliefert, sondern es hat damit
auch "DIE RECHTSSTAATLICHE ORDNUNG AUSSER KRAFT
22
GESETZT"! Diese insbesondere durch den Artikel 16a des
Grundgesetzes für die BRD offenkundig werdende Tatsache
wurde vom OLG Koblenz mit Urteil vom 14. Februar 2017 auch
gerichtlich festgestellt (Az. 13 UF 32/17).
Was aber sagt das Grundgesetz dazu, wenn Kriminelle in der
Politik - denn um was anderes sollte es sich bei Tätern eines
derart schwerwiegenden Verstoßes handeln? - die
rechtsstaatliche Ordnung beseitigen(!)? Ich wiederhole:
DIE RECHTSSTAATLICHE ORDNUNG BESEITIGEN! Es sagt
dazu, in seinem Artikel 20 Absatz 4: "Gegen jeden, der es
unternimmt, diese Ordnung zu beseitigen, haben alle
Deutschen das Recht zum Widerstand, wenn andere
Abhilfe nicht möglich ist".
Es geht jetzt um alles! Es geht um unser Vaterland! Es
geht um uns und um die Zukunft unserer Kinder und
Kindeskinder! ES GEHT UM UNSER DEUTSCHES VOLK!
Nürnberg, den 15. August 2019
*https://staging.bitchute.com/video/JbgeAiTV3rht/
____________________________________________________________________________
September 14, 2019 in video
* https://volkslehrer.info/videoarchiv/ein-schnitzer-kommt-selten-allein-wolfszeit-berlebenskurs-teil-2
9/11 After 18 Years
September 9, 2019 | Categories: Articles & Columns | Tags: | Print This Article
* https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2019/09/09/9-11-after-18-years/
___________________________________________________
23
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Preying Kosher Headmistress, Malka Leifer, protected by Israel - Inside insular Jewish community where headmistress Malka Leifer allegedly preyed on girls - *https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KqJAh5wvWEg Undercover in Israel in secret operation to expose alleged paedophile principal Malka Leifer –
*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izoBoQ-6zac Eva Herman, May 24, 2019: Blutgericht Europa - Karl der Große als Ursache des Untergangs von Deutschland und Europa:* https://www.amazon.de/Blutgericht-Eur... * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5OEUFs3uxo
***************************************************************************************
24