1

ADELAIDE INSTITUTE PO Box 3300 Norwood SA 5067 Online

Australia ISSN 1440-9828

Mob: 61+401692057

Email: info@adelaideinstitute.org

Web: http://www.adelaideinstitute.org

September 2019 No 1067

_______________________________________________________________

********SPRING HAS SPRUNG********

The Solitary Reaper - William Wordsworth Behold her, single in the field,

Yon solitary Highland Lass! Reaping and singing by herself;

Stop here, or gently pass!

Alone she cuts and binds the grain, And sings a melancholy strain; O listen! for the Vale profound Is overflowing with the sound.

No Nightingale did ever chaunt

More welcome notes to weary bands

Of travellers in some shady haunt, Among Arabian sands:

A voice so thrilling ne'er was heard

In spring-time from the Cuckoo-bird, Breaking the silence of the seas

Among the farthest Hebrides.

Will no one tell me what she sings?— Perhaps the plaintive numbers flow

For old, unhappy, far-off things, And battles long ago:

Or is it some more humble lay, Familiar matter of to-day?

Some natural sorrow, loss, or pain, That has been, and may be again?

Whate'er the theme, the Maiden sang As if her song could have no ending;

I saw her singing at her work, And o'er the sickle bending;—

I listen'd, motionless and still; And, as I mounted up the hill,

The music in my heart I bore, Long after it was heard no more.

------------------------------------------------------- William Wordsworth, 7 April 1770-23 April 1850, who rallied for "common speech" within poems and argued against the poetic biases of the period, wrote some of the most influential poetry in Western literature, including his most famous work, The Prelude, which is often considered to be the crowning achievement of English romanticism.

* https://poets.org/poem/solitary-reaper

________________________________________________ Innate = racism: German scientists want to banish the word 'race' on political grounds

UBER = like the Cukoo Bird: trickery, mimicry - thief - liar – killer -

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ UBER = Uber Technologies, Inc. is an American multinational transportation network company offering services that include peer-to-peer ridesharing, ride service hailing, food delivery, and a bicycle-sharing system. The company is based in San Francisco and has operations in over 785 metropolitan areas

worldwide.

***************** CUCKOO BIRD: KILLER - THIEF – LIAR – TRICKERY – MIMICRY: The common cuckoo does not make a nest of its own, and they do not bring up their own young. Instead, the female lays her eggs in the nests of other birds. Each female cuckoo specialises in just one host species, and lays camouflaged eggs in that bird's nest. … Within a species the calls are remarkably consistent across the range, even in species with very large ranges. This suggests, along with the fact that many species are not raised by their true parents, that the calls of

cuckoos are innate and not learnt. ********

ÜBER ALLES = Above All = First me/family/nation = Australia First/ America First ********

DEUTSCHLAND, DEUTSCHLAND ÜBER ALLES, ÜBER ALLES IN DER WELT Germany, Germany above all, above all in the world -

FAMILY – PATRIOTISM – NATIONALISM *https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIff7EB7pvc

___________________________________________________

2

The end of white America

and Israel lobby

Sept 7, 2019 02:09PM

The end of white America is now

assured. The only question

is the fate of the remnants.

The lack of response by white Americans to their demonization as they decline as a percent of the population demonstrates their lack of concern with their fate.

By Dr Paul Craig Roberts

It seems as if the West is dead in every way. The rule of law is dead throughout the West. Democracy is a scam. There is oligarchic rule. Everything is done for organized interest groups. Nothing is done for the people. Putin just declared: “West’s leading role is ending.” How right

he is.

The Brookings Institution is not a racist white supremacist outfit. It is a neoliberal/neoconservative “think tank.” One of its members, William H. Frey, has authored a report, “Less than Half of US Children Under 15 Are White, Census Shows,” based on the recently released 2018 US Census Bureau report. The information

in Frey’s article is fascinating. It shows a disappearing white population.

The number of white children, that is, the group of the next generation of parents, is not only declining relative to the populations of non-whites but also absolutely. During 2010-2018 the number of white children shrank

by 2.2 million. Overall, the white population of America has declined from 80 percent of the US population in

1980 to 60 percent in 2018.

The American middle class, which is largely white, bears the brunt of income taxation which means that white Americans bear the brunt of the cost of the welfare support systems. The white middle class also bears the

brunt through property taxes of the public school systems. Many middle class members pay again in private school tuition for the education of their children in safer and more ordered environments. The cost of university education is exorbitant. All of these costs are rising faster than middle class incomes, and this limits white procreation.

The decline of people of European descent as a percentage of the US population can only accelerate as the child-bearing ability of the white population

evaporates. The median age of Americans of European descent is 43.6 years. The median age of Hispanics is 29.5 years, and the median age of multiracial residents

of the US is 20.7 years. Over the past seven years, Americans of European descent experienced an excess of deaths over births.

Frey concludes his article:

“These demographic trends make plain that, as racially diverse younger generations become part of the labor force, tax base, and consumer base, the nation will need

to balance these groups’ distinct interests and needs in areas such as education, family services, and affordable housing with the health and social support requirements

of a large and faster growing older population that will be entering its post retirement years. Indeed, the youthful

‘minority white’ tipping point shown in the new census statistics needs to be duly noted. It has important implications for America’s future.”

This is the question that Frey quietly raises: “In Identity Politics America, where white people are demonized as victimizers and everyone else receives sympathy as their victims, where the Mexican-American head of New York

City public schools has announced his campaign to remove ‘toxic white values’ from the school curriculum, where the New York Times has committed to ‘reframing’ the United States as a racist white slave state, will the new majority composed of white people’s victims consent to giving up resources to provide Social Security and Medicare for people they have been brought up to

believe victimized them?”

The chances of such support are further negated by the diminishing numbers of the white voting population and by the decline of the US economy that is forcing the US

labor force into lowly paid domestic service jobs which are themselves threatened by robotics. Will a non-

European population struggling to make ends meet accept the taxation necessary for Social Security and Medicare for a demonized group of the population that they have been taught to hate? Identity Politics does not permit social cohesion.

Decades of unbroken massive inflows of third world immigrants have destroyed the “melting pot” and

produced in its place a tower of babel. Multicultural populations lack a common interest. They are the antithesis of a nation. Everywhere in the Western world the nations are expiring.

In 1973 John Raspail predicted the fate of European peoples in his novel, The Camp of the Saints. White

people are now living his novel.

It will be interesting to see if the growing Hispanic population displaces the shrinking white population as the group against which blacks will make claims for slavery reparations. Hispanics consist in part of Spanish and Portuguese ancestry, and the Spanish and Portuguese were colonial powers in the New World who

enslaved people. In a world of Identity Politics, will Hispanics replace white people as the victimizer?

It will also be interesting to see if the Israel lobby can put the same ring through the nose of the rising Hispanic/Asian majority as they have through the nose of the declining white majority. Can Hispanics and Asians be made to feel guilty about the holocaust and

persecution of Jews? Can their leaders, like white leaders, be bought into Israel’s service?

Or will people accustomed to the privilege of victim status themselves have the confidence to reject that they owe obligations to other victims?

Dr Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. The article was first published by the author’s website -- https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/. Dr. Roberts has granted permission to Press TV to republish his articles. (The views expressed in this article do not necessarily

reflect those of Press TV.) *https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2019/09/07/605570/The-end-of-white-America-and-Israel-lobby

___________________________________________________

3

The Takeover By Whitney Webb - September 06th, 2019

How an insider job is planned – it began with New

Zealand Prime Minister Adern who advocates not

mentioning the perpetrator’s name – keeping it secret -

Was used to initiate such a program of silence the other

western democratic head of states.

How the CIA, Mossad

and “the Epstein

Network” are

Exploiting Mass

Shootings to Create an

Orwellian Nightmare.

Feature photo | Graphic by Claudio Cabrera

Following another catastrophic mass shooting or crisis event, Orwellian “solutions” are set to be foisted on a frightened American public by the very network connected, not only to Jeffrey Epstein, but to a litany of crimes and a frightening history of plans to crush internal dissent in the United States.

Following the arrest and subsequent death in prison

of alleged child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, a

little-known Israeli tech company began to receive

increased publicity, but for all the wrong reasons.

Not long after Epstein’s arrest, and his relationships

and finances came under scrutiny, it was revealed

that the Israeli company Carbyne911 had received

substantial funding from Jeffrey Epstein as well as

Epstein’s close associate and former Prime Minister

of Israel Ehud Barak, and Silicon Valley venture

capitalist and prominent Trump backer Peter Thiel.

Carbyne911, or simply Carbyne, develops call-

handling and identification capabilities for

emergency response services in countries around

the world, including the United States, where it has

already been implemented in several U.S. counties

and has partnered with major U.S. tech companies

like Google. It specifically markets its product as a

way of mitigating mass shootings in the United

States without having to change existing U.S. gun

laws.

Yet, Carbyne is no ordinary tech company, as it is

deeply connected to the elite Israeli military

intelligence division, Unit 8200, whose “alumni”

often go on to create tech companies — Carbyne

among them — that frequently maintain their ties

to Israeli intelligence and, according to Israeli

media reports and former employees, often “blur

the line” between their service to Israel’s

defense/intelligence apparatus and their

commercial activity. As this report will reveal,

Carbyne is but one of several Israeli tech

companies marketing themselves as a technological

solution to mass shootings that has direct ties to

Israeli intelligence agencies.

In each case, these companies’ products are built

in such a way that they can easily be used to

illegally surveil the governments, institutions and

civilians that use them, a troubling fact given Unit

8200’s documented prowess in surveillance as a

means of obtaining blackmail and Israel’s history of

using tech companies to aggressively spy on the

U.S. government. This is further compounded by

the fact that Unit 8200-linked tech companies have

previously received U.S. government contracts to

place “backdoors” into the U.S.’ entire

telecommunications system as well as into the

popular products of major American tech

companies including Google, Microsoft and

Facebook, many of whose key managers and

executives are now former Unit 8200 officers.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has

made it no secret that placing Unit 8200 members

in top positions in multinational tech companies is a

“deliberate policy” meant to ensure Israel’s role as

the dominant global “cyber power”, while also

combating non-violent boycott movements

targeting Israel’s violations of international law and

stifling the United Nations’ criticisms of Israeli

government policy and military operations abroad.

As Jeffrey Epstein’s links to intelligence in both the

United States and Israel — the subject of a recent

four-part series exclusive to MintPress — began to

be revealed in full, his financing of Carbyne came

under scrutiny, particularly for the company’s deep

ties to Israeli intelligence as well as to certain

Americans with known connections to U.S.

intelligence. Ehud Barak’s own role as both

financier and chairman of Carbyne has also added

to that concern, given his long history of

involvement in covert intelligence operations for

Israel and his long-standing ties to Israeli military

intelligence.

Another funder of Carbyne, Peter Thiel, has his own

company that, like Carbyne, is set to profit from

the Trump administration’s proposed hi-tech

solutions to mass shootings. Indeed, after the

recent shooting in El Paso, Texas, President Trump

— who received political donations from and has

been advised by Thiel following his election —

asked tech companies to “detect mass shooters

before they strike,” a service already perfected by

Thiel’s company Palantir, which has developed

“pre-crime software” already in use throughout the

country. Palantir is also a contractor for the U.S.

intelligence community and also has a branch

based in Israel.

Perhaps most disturbing of all, whatever

technological solution is adopted by the Trump

administration, it is set to use a controversial

database first developed as part of a secretive U.S.

government program that involved notorious Iran-

Contra figures like Oliver North as a means of

tracking and flagging potential American dissidents

for increased surveillance and detention in the

event of a vaguely defined “national emergency.”

As this report will reveal, this database — often

referred to as “Main Core” — was created with the

involvement of Israeli intelligence and Israel

4

remained involved years after it was developed,

and potentially to the present. It was also used by

at least one former CIA official on President

Reagan’s National Security Council to blackmail

members of Congress, Congressional staffers and

journalists, among others.

Given recent reports on the Trump administration’s

plan to create a new government agency to use

“advanced technology” to identify “neurobehavioral

signs” of “someone headed toward a violent

explosive act” using data collected by consumer

electronic devices, the picture painted by the

technology currently being promoted and

implemented under the guise of “keeping

Americans safe” is deeply Orwellian. In fact, it

points directly to the genesis of a far-reaching

surveillance state far more extensive than anything

yet seen in American history and it is being jointly

developed by individuals connected to both

American and Israeli intelligence.

Demystifying Carbyne

Carbyne911, which will be referred to simply as

Carbyne in this report, is an Israeli tech-startup

that promises to revolutionize how calls are

handled by emergency service providers, as well as

by governments, corporations and educational

institutions. Not long after it was founded in 2014

by veterans of Israeli military intelligence, Carbyne

began to be specifically marketed as a solution to

mass shootings in the United States that goes

“beyond the gun debate” and improves the

“intelligence that armed emergency responders

receive before entering an armed shooter situation”

by providing video-streaming and acoustic input

from civilian smartphones and other devices

connected to the Carbyne network.

Prior to Jeffrey Epstein’s arrest in July, Carbyne had

been receiving high praise from U.S. and Israeli

media, with Fox News hailing the company’s

services as the answer to the U.S.’ “aging 911

systems” and the Jerusalem Post writing that the

company’s platform offers “hi-tech protection to

social workers and school principals.” Other reports

claimed that Carbyne’s services result in “a 65%

reduction in time-to-dispatch.”

Carbyne’s call-handling/crisis management

platform has already been implemented in several

U.S. counties and the company has offices not only

in the U.S. but also in Mexico, Ukraine and Israel.

Carbyne’s expansion to more emergency service

provider networks in the U.S. is likely, given that

federal legislation seeks to offer grants to upgrade

911 call centers throughout the country with the

very technology of which Carbyne is the leading

provider. One of the main lobby groups promoting

this legislation, the National Emergency Number

Association (NENA), has a “strong relationship”

with Carbyne, according to Carbyne’s website. In

addition, Carbyne has also begun marketing its

platform for non-emergency calls to governments,

educational institutions and corporations.

Yet, what seemed like the inevitability of Carbyne’s

widespread adoption in the U.S. hit a snag

following the recent arrest and subsequent death of

sex trafficker and pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, who

exploited underage girls for the purpose of

obtaining “blackmail” on the rich and poweful, an

operation that had clear ties to intelligence.

Epstein, after his first arrest and light sentence for

soliciting sex from a minor in 2007, was tapped by

former Israeli Prime

Minister and former head

of Israeli military

intelligence Ehud Barak,

to become a key financial

backer of Carbyne.

Ehud Barak, center, poses with Carbyne co-founders Alex Dizengof, Amir Elichai and Lital Leshem. Photo | Yossi Seliger

As a result of increased scrutiny of Epstein’s

business activities and his ties to Israel, particularly

to Barak, Epstein’s connection to Carbyne was

revealed and extensively reported on by the

independent media outlet Narativ, whose exposé

on Carbyne revealed not only some of the key

intelligence connections of the start-up company

but also how the architecture of Carbyne’s product

itself raises “serious privacy concerns.”

MintPress detailed many of Carbyne’s main

intelligence connections in Part III of the

investigative series “Inside the Jeffrey Epstein

Scandal: Too Big to Fail.” In addition to Barak —

former Israeli prime minister and former head of

Israeli military intelligence — serving as Carbyne’s

chairman and a key financer, the company’s

executive team are all former members of Israeli

intelligence, including the elite military intelligence

unit, Unit 8200, which is often compared to the

U.S. National Security Agency (NSA).

Carbyne’s current CEO, Amir Elichai, served in Unit

8200 and tapped former Unit 8200 commander and

current board member of AIPAC Pinchas Buchris to

serve as the company’s director and on its board.

In addition to Elichai, another Carbyne co-founder,

Lital Leshem, also served in Unit 8200 and later

worked for Israeli private spy company Black Cube.

The only Carbyne co-founder that didn’t serve in

Unit 8200 is Alex Dizengof, who previously worked

for Israel’s Prime Minister’s office.

As MintPress noted in a past report detailing Israeli

military intelligence’s deep ties to American tech

giant Microsoft, Unit 8200 is an elite unit of the

Israeli Intelligence corps that is part of the IDF’s

Directorate of Military Intelligence and is involved

mainly in signal intelligence (i.e., surveillance),

cyberwarfare and code decryption. It is frequently

described as the Israeli equivalent of the NSA and

Peter Roberts, senior research fellow at Britain’s

Royal United Services Institute, characterized the

5

unit in an interview with the Financial Times as

“probably the foremost technical intelligence

agency in the world and stand[ing] on a par with

the NSA in everything except scale.”

Notably, the NSA and Unit 8200 have collaborated

on numerous projects, most infamously on the

Stuxnet virus as well as the Duqu malware. In

addition, the NSA is known to work with veterans

of Unit 8200 in the private sector, such as when

the NSA hired two Israeli companies, to create

backdoors into all the major U.S.

telecommunications systems and major tech

companies, including Facebook, Microsoft and

Google. Both of those companies, Verint and Narus,

have top executives with ties to Israeli intelligence

and one of those companies, Verint (formerly

Comverse Infosys), has a history of aggressively

spying on U.S. government facilities. Unit 8200 is

also known for spying on civilians in the occupied

Palestinian territories for “coercion purposes” —

i.e., gathering info for blackmail — and also for

spying on Palestinian-Americans via an intelligence-

sharing agreement with the NSA.

Unlike many other Unit 8200-linked start-ups,

Carbyne also boasts several tie-ins to the Trump

administration, including Palantir founder and

Trump ally Peter Thiel — another investor in

Carbyne. In addition, Carbyne’s board of advisers

includes former Palantir employee Trae Stephens,

who was a member of the Trump transition team,

as well as former Secretary of Homeland Security

Michael Chertoff. Trump donor and New York real-

estate developer Eliot Tawill is also on Carbyne’s

board, alongside Ehud Barak and Pinchas Buchris.

Yet, privacy concerns with Carbyne go beyond the

company’s ties to Israeli intelligence and U.S.

intelligence contractors like Peter Thiel. For

instance, Carbyne’s smartphone app extracts the

following information from the phones on which it

is installed:

Device location, video live-streamed from the

smartphone to the call center, text messages in a

two-way chat window, any data from a user’s phone if

they have the Carbyne app and ESInet, and any

information that comes over a data link, which Carbyne

opens in case the caller’s voice link drops out.”

(emphasis added)

According to Carbyne’s website, this same

information can also be obtained from any

smartphone, even if it does

not have Carbyne’s app

installed, if that phone calls a

911 call center that uses

Carbyne or merely any other

number connected to

Carbyne’s network.

Carbyne gathers data points from users’ phones as well as a myriad of other web-connected devices.

Carbyne is a Next-Generation 9-11 (NG911)

platform and the explicit goal of NG911 is for all

911 systems nationwide to become interconnected.

Thus, even if Carbyne is not used by all 911 call

centers using an NG911 platform, Carbyne will

ostensibly have access to the data used by all

emergency service providers and devices

connected to those networks. This guiding principle

of NG911 also makes it likely that one platform will

be favored at the federal level to foster such

interconnectivity and, given that it has already

been adopted by several counties and has ties to

the Trump administration, Carbyne is the logical

choice.

Another cause for concern is how other countries

have used platforms like Carbyne, which were first

marketed as emergency response tools, for the

purpose of mass surveillance. Narativ noted the

following in its investigation of Carbyne:

In May, Human Rights Watch revealed Chinese

authorities use a platform not unlike Carbyne to

illegally surveil Uyghurs. China’s Integrated Joint

Operations Platform brings in a much bigger data-

set and sources of video, which includes an app on

people’s phones. Like Carbyne, the platform was

designed to report emergencies. Chinese

authorities have turned it into a tool of mass

surveillance.

Human Rights Watch reverse-engineered the app.

The group discovered the app automatically profiles

a user under 36 “person types” including “followers

of Six Lines” which is the term used to identify

Uyghurs. Another term refers to “Hajj,” the annual

Islamic pilgrimage to Mecca. The app monitors

every aspect of a user’s life, including personal

conversations [and] power usage, and tracks a

user’s movement.”

Such technology is currently used by Israeli military

intelligence and Israel’s domestic intelligence

agency Shin Bet to justify “pre-crime” detentions of

Palestinians in the occupied West Bank. As will be

noted in greater detail later in this report,

Palestinians’ comments on social media are tracked

by artificial intelligence algorithms that flag them

for indefinite detention if they write social media

posts that contain “tripwire” phrases such as “the

sword of Allah.”

Carbyne’s platform has its own “pre-crime”

elements, such as it’s c-Records component, which

stores and analyzes information on past calls and

events that pass through its network. This

information “enables decision makers to accurately

analyze the past and present behavior of their callers,

react accordingly, and in time predict future

patterns.” (emphasis added)

Concerns have recently been raised that “pre-

crime” technology may soon become more widely

adopted in the U.S., after President Trump stated

that one of his planned solutions to mass shootings

6

in the wake of the recent tragedy in El Paso was for

big tech companies to detect potential shooters

before they strike.

Israeli intelligence, Blackmail and Silicon Valley

Though many of the individuals involved in funding

or managing Carbyne have proven ties to

intelligence, a closer look into several of these

players reveals even deeper connections to both

Israeli and U.S. intelligence.

One of Carbyne’s clearest connections to Israeli

intelligence is through its chairman and one of its

funders, Ehud Barak. Though Barak is best known

for being a former prime minister of Israel, he is

also a former minister of defense and the former

head of Israeli military intelligence. He oversaw

Unit 8200’s operations, as well as other units of

Israeli military intelligence, in all three of those

positions. For most of his military and later political

career, Barak has been closely associated with

covert operations.

Prior to the public scrutiny of Barak’s relationship

to Jeffrey Epstein, following the latter’s arrest this

past July and subsequent death, Barak had come

under fire for his ties to disgraced film mogul

Harvey Weinstein. Indeed, it was Ehud Barak who

put Weinstein in contact with the Israeli private

intelligence outfit Black Cube, which employs

former Mossad agents and Israeli military

intelligence operatives, as Weinstein sought to

intimidate the women who had accused him of

sexual assault and sexual harassment. Former

Mossad director Meir Dagan led Black Cube’s board

until his death in 2016 and Carbyne co-founder

Lital Leshem is Black Cube’s former director of

marketing.

After Barak put him in contact with Black Cube’s

leadership, Weinstein, according to The New

Yorker, used the private spy firm to “‘target,’ or

collect information on, dozens of individuals, and

compile psychological profiles that sometimes

focused on their personal or sexual histories.” In

addition, The New Yorker noted that “Weinstein

monitored the progress of the investigations

personally” and “also enlisted former employees

from his film enterprises to join in the effort,

collecting names and placing calls that, according

to some sources who received them, felt

intimidating.”

Yet, more recently, it has been Barak’s close

relationship to Epstein that has raised eyebrows

and opened him up to political attacks from his

rivals. Epstein and Barak were first introduced by

former Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres in 2002,

a time when Epstein’s pedophile blackmail and sex

trafficking operation was in full swing.

Barak was a frequent visitor to Epstein’s residences

in New York, so often that The Daily Beast reported

that numerous residents of an apartment building

linked to Epstein “had seen Barak in the building

multiple times over the last few years, and nearly

half a dozen more described running into his

security detail,” adding that “the building is

majority-owned by Epstein’s younger brother,

Mark, and has been tied to the financier’s alleged

New York trafficking ring.” Specifically, several

apartments in the building were “being used to

house underage girls from South America, Europe

and the former Soviet Union,” according to a

former bookkeeper employed by one of Epstein’s

main procurers of underage girls, Jean Luc Brunel.

Barak is also known to have spent the night at one

of Epstein’s residences at least once, was

photographed leaving Epstein’s residence as

recently as 2016, and has admitted to visiting

Epstein’s island, which has sported nicknames

including “Pedo Island,” “Lolita Island” and “Orgy

Island.” In 2004, Barak received $2.5 million from

Leslie Wexner’s Wexner Foundation, where Epstein

was a trustee as well as one of the foundation’s top

donors, officially for unspecified “consulting

services” and “research” on the foundation’s behalf.

In 2015, Barak formed a limited partnership

company in Israel for the explicit purpose of

investing in Carbyne (then known as Reporty) and

invested millions of dollars in the company, quickly

becoming a major shareholder and subsequently

the company’s public face and the chairman of its

board. At least $1 million of the money invested in

this Barak-created company that was later used to

invest in Carbyne came from the Southern Trust

Company, which was owned by Jeffrey Epstein.

In July, Bloomberg reported that Epstein’s

Southern Trust Company is identified in U.S. Virgin

Islands filings as “a DNA database and data

mining” company. Given Carbyne’s clear potential

for data-mining and civilian profiling, Epstein’s

investment in Carbyne using this specific company

suggests that Carbyne’s investors have long been

aware of this little advertised aspect of Carbyne’s

product.

In a statement to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz,

Barak asserted:

“I saw the business opportunity and registered a

partnership in my control in Israel. A small number

of people I know invest in it…Since these are

private investments, it wouldn’t be proper or right

for me to expose the investors’ details.”

However, Barak later admitted that Epstein had

been one of the investors.

MintPress’ recent series on the Jeffrey Epstein

scandal noted in detail Epstein’s ties to CIA/Mossad

intelligence assets, such as Adnan Khashoggi; CIA

front companies, such as Southern Air Transport;

and organized crime, through his close association

with Leslie Wexner. In addition, Epstein’s long-time

“girlfriend” and alleged madam, Ghislaine Maxwell,

has family links to Israeli intelligence through her

father, Robert Maxwell. While it appears that

7

Epstein may have been working for more than one

intelligence agency, Zev Shalev, former executive

producer for CBS News and journalist at Narativ,

recently stated that he had independently

confirmed with two unconnected sources “closely

connected to the Epstein story and in a position to

know” that Epstein had “worked for Israeli military

intelligence.”

-------------------------------------

Zev Shalev @ZevShalev

Exclusive: We have two independent sources confirming

Jeffrey Epstein worked for Israeli military intelligence. In

each case the source is closely connected to the Epstein

story and in a position to know. You can take it to the

bank.

@narativlive http://narativ.org/2019/07/27/building-big-brother/ …

Jeffrey Epstein: Building Big Brother

Exclusive: Jeffrey Epstein's investment in an Israeli start-up reveals a myriad of links to Donald Trump and Israeli spies.

narativ.org

1,056

7:47 AM - Aug 21, 2019

----------------------- Notably, Epstein, who was known for his interest in

obtaining blackmail through the sexual abuse of the

underaged girls he exploited, also claimed to have

“damaging information” on prominent figures in

Silicon Valley. In a conversation last year with New

York Times reporter James Stewart, Epstein

claimed to have “potentially damaging or

embarrassing” information on Silicon Valley’s elite

and told Stewart that these top figures in the

American tech industry “were hedonistic and

regular users of recreational drugs.” Epstein also

told Stewart that he had “witnessed prominent tech

figures taking drugs and arranging for sex” and

claimed to know “details about their supposed

sexual proclivities.”

In the lead-up to his recent arrest, Jeffrey Epstein

appeared to have been attempting to rebrand as a

“tech investor,” as he had done interviews with

several journalists including Stewart about

technology investing in the months before he was

hit with federal sex trafficking charges.

Jessica Lessin, editor-in-chief of The Information,

told Business Insider that a journalist working for

The Information had interviewed Epstein a month

before his recent arrest because “he was believed

to be an investor in venture capital funds.”

However, Lessin claimed that the interview was not

“newsworthy” and said the site had no plans to

publish its contents. Business Insider claimed that

the way the interviews with Epstein had been

arranged “suggests that someone in Silicon Valley

may have been trying to help Epstein connect with

reporters.”

Though it is unknown exactly which Silicon Valley

figures were most connected to Epstein and which

tech executives were potentially being blackmailed

by Epstein, it is known that Epstein associated with

several prominent tech executives, including

Google co-founder Sergey Brin, Facebook co-

founder Mark Zuckerberg, Tesla CEO Elon Musk,

Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, and LinkedIn co-

founder Reid Hoffman.

Last year, Epstein claimed to be advising Tesla and

Elon Musk, who had been previously photographed

with Epstein’s alleged madam Ghislaine Maxwell. A

few years ago, Epstein also attended a dinner

hosted by LinkedIn’s Reid Hoffman, where Musk

had allegedly introduced Epstein to Mark

Zuckerberg. Google’s Sergey Brin is known to have

attended a dinner hosted

by Epstein at his New York

residence where Donald

Trump was also in

attendance.

Elon Musk with Epstein’s alleged madam Ghislaine Maxwell at an Oscars after-

party on March 2, 2014. Kevin Mazur | VF14

These associations suggest that the person in

Silicon Valley who was trying to boost Epstein’s

image as a tech investor before his arrest may

have been Peter Thiel, whose Founders Fund had

also invested in Carbyne. Thiel was an early

investor in Facebook and is still on its board,

connecting him to Zuckerberg; he is also a funder

of Elon Musk’s SpaceX and a former colleague of

Musk’s through PayPal. In addition, Thiel has ties to

Reid Hoffman and both Thiel and Hoffman are

prominent backers of Facebook.

It is unknown whether Epstein’s “damaging

information” and apparent blackmail on notable

individuals in the American technology industry

were used to advance the objectives of Carbyne,

which recently partnered with tech giants Google

and Cisco Systems — and, more broadly, the

expansion of Israeli intelligence-linked tech

companies into the American tech sector,

particularly through the acquisition of Israeli tech

start-ups linked to Unit 8200 by major U.S. tech

companies.

The latter seems increasingly likely given that the

father of Ghislaine Maxwell — one of Epstein’s chief

co-conspirators in his intelligence-linked sexual

blackmail operation involving minors — was a

Mossad operative who helped sell software that had

been bugged by Israeli intelligence to government

agencies and sensitive facilities around the world,

including in the United States.

8

As will be noted later in this report, Israel’s Prime

Minister Benjamin Netanyahu — to whom all of

Israel’s intelligence agencies answer by virtue of

his position — has stated on more than one

occasion that the acquisition of Israeli intelligence-

linked start-ups by foreign tech giants, especially in

Silicon Valley, is a current and “deliberate policy” of

the state of Israel.

Carbyne’s ties to U.S. intelligence

While Epstein and Barak are the two financiers of

Carbyne whose ties to intelligence are clearest,

another funder of Carbyne, Peter Thiel, has ties to

U.S. intelligence and a history of investing in other

companies founded by former members of Unit

8200. Thiel co-founded and still owns a controlling

stake in the company Palantir, which was initially

funded with a $2 million investment from the CIA’s

venture capital fund In-Q-Tel and quickly thereafter

became a contractor for the CIA.

After the success of its contract with the CIA,

Palantir became a contractor for a variety of federal

agencies, including the FBI, the Defense

Intelligence Agency (DIA), the National Security

Agency (NSA), the Department of Homeland

Security(DHS) and the military’s Special Operations

Command, among others. Last year, it won a

contract to create a new battlefield intelligence

system for the U.S. Army. Palantir is also in

demand for its “pre-crime technology,” which has

been used by several U.S. police departments.

According to the Guardian, “Palantir tracks

everyone from potential terrorist suspects to

corporate fraudsters, child traffickers and what

they refer to as ‘subversives’… it is all done using

prediction.”

Thiel has gained attention in recent years for his

support of President Trump and for becoming an

adviser to Trump following the 2016 election, when

he was “a major force in the transition,” according

to Politico, and “helped fill positions in the Trump

administration with former staff.” One of those

former staffers was Trae Stephens, who is also on

Carbyne’s board of advisers. Thiel also has

business ties to Trump’s son-in-law and influential

adviser, Jared Kushner, as well as to Kushner’s

brother Josh. A senior Trump campaign aide told

Politico in 2017 that “Thiel is immensely powerful

within the administration through his connection to

Jared.”

Thiel has also backed some prominent Israeli tech

start-ups connected to Unit 8200, such as

BillGuard, which Thiel funded along with former

Google CEO Eric Schmidt and other investors.

BillGuard was founded by Raphael Ouzan, a former

officer in Unit 8200, who serves on the board of

directors of Start-Up Nation Central (SUNC)

alongside neoconservative American hedge fund

manager Paul Singer, neoconservative political

operative and adviser Dan Senor, and Terry Kassel,

who works for Singer at his

hedge fund, Elliott

Management.

Peter Thiel greets Netanyahu during a 2017 meeting in Israel. Photo | Israel PM

SUNC is an organization founded by Paul Singer,

who has donated heavily to both President Trump

and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu. Since it was

founded in 2012, SUNC has sought to integrate

Unit 8200-connected Israeli tech start-ups into

foreign companies, primarily American companies,

and has helped oversee the shift of thousands of

high-paying tech jobs from the U.S. to Israel.

Another Carbyne-connected individual worth noting

is the former head of the Department of Homeland

Security, Michael Chertoff, who serves on

Carbyne’s board of advisers. In addition to

Chertoff’s ties to DHS, Chertoff’s company, The

Chertoff Group, employees several prominent

former members of the U.S. intelligence community

as principals, including Michael Hayden, former

director of the CIA and former director of the NSA;

and Charles Allen, former assistant director of

Central Intelligence for Collection at the CIA, who

worked at the agency for over 40 years.

The Chertoff Group has a long-standing and

lucrative contract with the company OSI Systems,

which produces full-body scanners and markets

itself as a solution to mass shootings and crisis

events, not unlike Carbyne. While Chertoff’s

company was advising OSI Systems, Chertoff went

on a media blitz to promote the widespread use of

the machines produced by OSI Systems and even

called on Congress to “fund a large-scale

deployment of next-generation systems.” Chertoff

did not disclose his conflict of interest while publicly

promoting OSI’s full-body scanners.

Some have also alleged that Chertoff’s mother,

Livia Eisen, had links to Israeli intelligence.

According to her 1998 obituary, cited by both

researcher/author Christopher Bollyn and journalist

Jonathan Cook, Eisen participated in the Mossad

operation code-named “Magic Carpet” while

working for Israel’s El Al Airlines. Both Bollyn and

Cook have suggested that Eisen’s participation in

this covert Israeli intelligence operation strongly

indicates that she had ties to the Mossad.

Melding into Silicon Valley

Beyond its troubling connections to Silicon Valley

oligarchs, Israeli military intelligence and the U.S.-

military industrial complex, Carbyne’s recent

partnerships with two specific technology

companies — Google and Cisco Systems — raise

even more red flags.

Carbyne announced its partnership with Cisco

Systems this past April, with the latter announcing

that it would begin “aligning its unified call

manager with Carbyne’s call-handling platform,

9

allowing emergency call centers to collect data

from both 911 callers and nearby government-owned

IoT [Internet of Things] devices.” A report on the

partnership published by Government Technology

magazine stated that “Carbyne’s platform will be

integrated into Cisco Kinetic for Cities, an IoT data

platform that shares data across community

infrastructure, smart city solutions, applications

and connected devices.” The report also noted that

“Carbyne will also be the only 911 solution in the

Cisco Marketplace.”

As part of the partnership, Carbyne’s President of

North American Operations Paul Tatro told

Government Technology that the Carbyne platform

would combine the data it obtains from

smartphones and other Carbyne-connected devices

with “what’s available through nearby Cisco-

connected road cameras, roadside sensors, smart

streetlamps, smart parking meters or other

devices.” Tatro further asserted that “Carbyne can

also analyze data that’s being collected by Cisco

IoT devices … and alert 911 automatically, without

any person making a phone call, if there appears to

be a worthy problem,” and expressed his view that

soon most emergency calls will not be made by

human beings but “by smart cars, telematics or

other smart city devices.”

A few months after partnering with Cisco Systems,

Carbyne announced its partnership with Google on

July 10, just three days after Carbyne funder

Jeffrey Epstein was arrested in New York on federal

sex trafficking charges. Carbyne’s press release of

the partnership described how the company and

Google would be teaming up in Mexico “to offer

advanced mobile location to emergency

communications centers (ECCs) throughout Mexico”

following the

conclusion of a

successful four-week

pilot program between

Carbyne and Google in

the Central American

nation.

Google Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt meets Netanyahu at his Jerusalem office. Israel PM | YouTube

The press release also stated:

Carbyne will provide Google’s Android ELS

(Emergency Location Service) in real time from

emergency calls made on AndroidTM devices.

Deployment for any ECC in the country won’t

require any integration, with Carbyne providing

numerous options for connection to their secure

ELS Gateway once an ECC is approved. The

Carbyne automated platform, requiring no human

interaction, has the potential to save thousands of

lives each year throughout Mexico.”

The reason Carybne’s partnerships with Cisco

Systems and Google are significant lies in the role

that Cisco and former Google CEO Eric Schmidt

have played in the creation of a controversial

“incubator” for Israeli tech start-ups with deep ties

to Israeli military intelligence, American

neoconservative donor Paul Singer, and the U.S.’

National Security Agency (NSA).

This company, called Team8, is an Israeli

company-creation platform whose CEO and co-

founder is Nadav Zafrir, former commander of Unit

8200. Two of the company’s other three co-

founders are also “alumni” of Unit 8200. Among

Team8’s top investors is Schmidt, the former CEO

of Google, who also joined Peter Thiel in funding

the Unit 8200-linked BillGuard, as well as major

tech companies including Cisco Systems and

Microsoft.

Last year, Team8 controversially hired the former

head of the NSA and U.S. Cyber Command, Retired

Admiral Mike Rogers, and Zafrir stated that his

interest in hiring Rogers was that Rogers would be

“instrumental in helping strategize” Team8’s

expansion in the United States. Jake Williams, a

veteran of NSA’s Tailored Access Operations (TAO)

hacking unit, told CyberScoop:

Rogers is not being brought into this role because

of his technical experience. …It’s purely because of

his knowledge of classified operations and his

ability to influence many in the U.S. government

and private-sector contractors.”

Team8 has also been heavily promoted by Start-Up

Nation Central (SUNC). SUNC prominently features

Team8 and Zafrir on the cybersecurity section of its

website and also sponsored a talk by Zafrir and an

Israeli government economist at the World

Economic Forum, often referred to as “Davos,” that

was attended personally by Paul Singer.

SUNC itself has deep ties to Israeli military

intelligence, with former Unit 8200 officer Raphael

Ouzan serving on its board of directors. Another

example of SUNC-Unit 8200 ties can be seen with

Inbal Arieli, who served as SUNC’s Vice President of

Strategic Partnerships from 2014 to 2017 and

continues to serve as a senior adviser to the

organization. Arieli, a former lieutenant in Unit

8200, is the founder and head of the 8200

Entrepreneurship and Innovation Support Program

(EISP), which was the first start-up accelerator in

Israel aimed at harnessing “the vast network and

entrepreneurial DNA of [Unit] 8200 alumni” and is

currently one of the top company accelerators in

Israel, alongside Team8. Arieli was the top

executive at 8200 EISP while working at SUNC and

several other top SUNC staffers are also connected

to Israeli military intelligence.

Thus, Google and Cisco’s connections to Team8

suggests that their partnerships with another

Israeli military intelligence-connected firm like

Carbyne is a deepening of those two companies’

links to the growing bi-national security state that

10

is uniting key players in the U.S. military-industrial

complex and Israeli intelligence.

Mossad-backed Panic Buttons, coming to a school near you

Carbyne is hardly the only Israeli intelligence-linked

tech company marketing itself in the United States

as a solution to mass shootings. Another Israeli

start-up, known as Gabriel, was founded in 2016 in

response to a shooting in Tel Aviv and the Pulse

Nightclub shooting in the United States, which took

place just days apart.

Created by Israeli-American Yoni Sherizen and

Israeli citizen Asaf Adler, Gabriel is similar to

Carbyne in the sense that elements of its crisis

response platform require installation on civilian

smartphones as well as devices used by crisis

responders. The main difference is that Gabriel also

installs one or a series of physical “panic buttons,”

depending on the size of the building to be secured,

that also double as video and audio communication

devices connected to the Gabriel network.

As with Carbyne, the ties between Gabriel and

Israeli intelligence are obvious. Indeed, Gabriel’s

four-person advisory board includes Ram Ben-

Barak, former deputy director of the Mossad and

former director-general of Israel’s intelligence

ministry; Yohanan Danino, former chief of police for

the state of Israel; and Kobi Mor, former director of

overseas missions for the Israeli intelligence

agency Shin Bet. The only American on the

advisory board is Ryan Petty, the father of a

Parkland shooting victim and friend of former

Florida Governor Rick Scott.

Gabriel’s only disclosed funder is U.S.-based

MassChallenge, a start-up accelerator non-profit.

Gabriel is funded by MassChallenge’s Israel branch,

which was opened six months prior to Gabriel’s

creation and is partnered with the Israeli

government and the Kraft Group. The Kraft Group

is managed by Robert Kraft, who is currently

embroiled in a prostitution scandal and is also a

close friend of President Trump.

Notably, one of MassChallenge Israel’s featured

experts is Wendy Singer, the executive director of

SUNC, the organization created and funded by

neoconservative Trump backer Paul Singer with the

explicit purpose of promoting Israel’s tech start-ups

and their integration into foreign, chiefly American,

businesses. As was noted in a recent MintPress

report on SUNC, Wendy Singer is the sister of

neoconservative political operative Dan Senor, who

founded the now-defunct Foreign Policy Initiative

with Robert Kagan and Bill Kristol, and was

previously the director of AIPAC’s Israel office for

16 years.

Gabriel’s founders have been quite upfront about

the fact that the uptick in shootings in the U.S. has

greatly aided their company’s growth and success.

Last November, Sherizen told The Jerusalem Post

that new mass shootings in the U.S. not only

increased U.S. demand for his company’s product

but also were opportunities to show the

effectiveness of Gabriel’s approach:

Unfortunately every month there seems to be

another high-profile event of this nature. After the

Vegas shooting, we were able to show [that] our

system would have managed to identify the

location of the shooter much quicker.”

The Jerusalem Post noted that Gabriel is set to

make considerable profits if concern over mass

shootings continues to build in the U.S., writing:

With more than 475,000 soft targets across the US

and amid increasing security fears, the potential

market for Gabriel is huge. The company could gain

revenues of almost $1 billion if only 10% of soft

targets were to invest around $20,000 in its alert

systems.”

Sherizen told the Jerusalem Post:

Our starter kit costs $10,000. Depending on the

size and makeup of the community building, it

would cost between $20-30,000 to fully outfit the

location. We have made it very affordable. This is a

game-changer for the lock-down and active shooter

drills that are now a standard part of any child’s

upbringing in the States.”

Much more than just a start-up

While it is certainly possible that numerous former

officials and commanders of elite Israeli intelligence

agencies may have no ulterior motive in advising or

founding technology start-up companies, it is worth

pointing out that top figures in Israel’s military

intelligence agencies and the Mossad don’t see it

that way.

Last March, Israeli media outlet Calcalist Tech

published a report entitled “Israel Blurs the Line

Between Defense Apparatus and Local

Cybersecurity Hub,” which noted that “since 2012,

cyber-related and intelligence projects that were

previously carried out in-house in the Israeli

military and Israel’s main intelligence arms are

transferred to companies that in some cases were

built for this exact purpose.” (emphasis added)

The article notes that beginning in 2012, Israel’s

intelligence and military intelligence agencies

began to outsource “activities that were previously

managed in-house, with a focus on software and cyber

technologies.” (emphasis added)

It continues:

In some cases, managers of development projects

in the Israeli military and intelligence arms were

encouraged to form their own companies, which

then took over the project,’ an Israeli venture

capitalist familiar with the matter told Calcalist

Tech.”

Notably, Calcalist Tech states that the controversial

company Black Cube was created this way and that

Black Cube had been contracted, and is likely still

11

contracted, by Israel’s Ministry of Defense. The

private security agency Black Cube is known to

have two separate divisions for corporations and

governments. The firm was recently caught

attempting to undermine the Iran nuclear deal —

then also a top political objective of Israeli Prime

Minister Benjamin Netanyahu — by attempting to

obtain information on the “financial or sexual

impropriety” (i.e., blackmail) of top U.S. officials

involved in drafting the accord. NBC News noted

last year that “Black Cube’s political work

frequently intersects with Israel’s

foreign policy priorities.” As

previously mentioned, one of

Carbyne’s co-founders — Lital

Leshem, also a veteran of Unit

8200 — worked for Black Cube

prior to starting Carbyne.

The entrance to Black Cube’s offices on the 26th floor of a Tel Aviv high rise, Feb. 8, 2019. Raphael Satter | AP

One of the main companies profiled in the Calcalist

Tech report appeared to be a front for Israeli

intelligence, as its registered owner was found not

to exist: even high-level employees at the company

had never heard of him; his registered addresses

were for nonexistent locations in Israel’s capital of

Tel Aviv; and the three people with that name in

Tel Aviv denied any association with the business.

This company — which Calcalist Tech was unable to

name after the Israeli military censor determined

that doing so could negatively impact Israeli

“national security” — was deliberately created to

service the Israeli military and Israeli intelligence.

It is also “focused on cyber technologies with

expertise in research and development of advanced

products and applications suitable for defense and

commercial entities.” (emphases added) In addition,

the company’s management consists largely of

“veterans of Israeli military technology units.”

Notably, a former employee of this company told

Calcalist Tech that “crossing the lines between

military service and employment at the commercial

outfit was ‘commonplace’ while he was working at

the company.”

It’s not exactly clear why Israel’s military

intelligence and other intelligence agencies decided

to begin outsourcing its operations in 2012, though

Calcalist Tech suggests the reasoning was related

to the difference in wages between the private

sector and the public sector, with pay being much

higher in the former. However, it is notable that

2012 was also the year that Paul Singer — together

with Netanyahu’s long-time economic adviser and

former chair of the Israeli National Economic

Council, Eugene Kandel — decided to create Start-

Up Nation Central.

As MintPress noted earlier this year, SUNC was

founded as part of a deliberate Israeli government

effort to counter the nonviolent Boycott, Divest and

Sanctions (BDS) movement and to make Israel the

dominant global “cyber power.” This policy is aimed

at increasing Israel’s diplomatic power and

specifically undermining BDS as well as the United

Nations, which has repeatedly condemned Israel’s

government for war crimes and violations of

international law in relation to the Palestinians.

Last year, Netanyahu was asked by Fox News host

Mark Levin whether the large growth seen in recent

years in Israel’s technology sector, specifically tech

start-ups, was part of Netanyahu’s plan. Netanyahu

responded, “That’s very much my plan … It’s a very

deliberate policy.” He later added that “Israel had

technology because the military, especially military

intelligence, produced a lot of capabilities. These

incredibly gifted young men and women who come

out of the military or the Mossad, they want to

start their start-ups.”

Netanyahu again outlined this policy at the 2019

Cybertech Conference in Tel Aviv, where he stated

that Israel’s emergence as one of the top five

“cyber powers” had “required allowing this

combination of military intelligence, academia and

industry to converge in one place” and that this

further required allowing “our graduates of our

military and intelligence units to merge into

companies with local partners and foreign

partners.”

The direct tie-ins of SUNC to Israel’s government

and the successful effort led by SUNC and other

companies and organizations to place former

military intelligence and intelligence operatives in

strategic positions in major multinational

technology companies reveal that this “deliberate

policy” has had a major and undeniable impact on

the global tech industry, especially in Silicon Valley.

Mossad gets its own In-Q-Tel

This “deliberate policy” of Netanyahu’s also recently

resulted in the creation of a Mossad-run venture

capital fund that is specifically focused on financing

Israeli tech start-ups. The venture capital fund,

called Libertad, was first announced by Israel’s

Prime Minister’s Office and was created with the

explicit purpose of “increasing the Israeli

intelligence agency’s knowledge base and fostering

collaboration with Israel’s vibrant startup scene” It

was modeled after the CIA’s venture capital fund

In-Q-Tel, which invested in several Silicon Valley

companies turned government and intelligence

contractors — including Google and Palantir — with

a similar goal in mind.

Libertad declines to reveal the recipients of its

funding, but announced last December that it had

chosen five companies in the fields of robotics,

energy, encryption, web intelligence, and natural

language processing and text analysis. In regard to

its interest in web intelligence, a Mossad employee

told the Jerusalem Post that the intelligence agency

was specifically interested in “innovative

12

technologies for [the] automatic identification of

personality characteristics – personality profiling – based

on online behavior and activity, using methods based

on statistics, machine learning, and other areas.”

(emphasis added)

According to Libertad’s website, in return for its

investment, now set at NIS 2 million (~$580,000)

per year per company, “the Mossad will receive

access to the IP [initial product] developed during

R&D [Research and Development] while under

contract, and a non-commercial, non-exclusive

license to use it. Libertad’s contract with the

company will not provide it with any additional

rights.” In an interview with Calcalist Tech, Mossad

Director Yossi Cohen told the paper that the

Mossad’s partnership with civilian companies in

Israel is “excellent” and that the agency will

continue to strengthen those ties.

Israeli intelligence has a documented history in

placing “backdoors” into technology products for

the purpose of surveillance, with one well-known

case being Israel’s repurposing of the PROMIS

software, discussed in Part III of MintPress’ series

on Jeffrey Epstein. Furthermore, given that U.S.

intelligence, specifically the NSA, had “backdoors”

placed into the products of major Silicon Valley

companies (a service performed by Israeli

intelligence-linked tech companies no less), Mossad

may very well plan on doing the same with the

technology products of companies it backs through

Libertad.

Tim Shorrock, investigative journalist and author of

Spies For Hire: The Secret World of Intelligence

Outsourcing, told MintPress that the Mossad’s

continuation of such practices through Libertad was

definitely plausible, especially given what Shorrock

described as the “unusual” choice of Libertad

choosing not to release the identities of the

companies in which it invests.

“The Mossad is trying to hide what they are

investing in,” Shorrock stated, adding that

Libertad’s secrecy “raises a lot of questions”

particularly given that it was modeled after the

CIA’s In-Q-Tel. Shorrock noted that In-Q-Tel and

other venture capital funds with ties to U.S.

intelligence or the U.S. military rarely, if ever, hide

the identities of the companies they finance.

*https://www.mintpressnews.com/cia-israel-mossad-

jeffrey-epsteinorwelliannightmare/261692/?jwsource=cl

However, Libertad is merely the latest and most

public expression of the Mossad’s interest in Israeli

tech start-ups, the lion’s share of which are created

by veterans of Unit 8200 or other Israeli

intelligence agencies. Indeed, former Mossad

Director Tamir Pardo stated in 2017 that

“everyone” in the Israeli cybertechnology sector is

an “alumni” of either Israeli intelligence, like the

Mossad, or Israeli military intelligence, like Unit

8200. Pardo even went as far as to say that the

Mossad itself is “like a start-up.”

Pardo himself, after leaving his post as Mossad

director in 2016, dove straight into the world of

Israeli tech start-ups, becoming chairman of Sepio

Systems, whose two CEOs are former Unit 8200

officers. Sepio Systems’ advisory board includes

the former chief information security officer of the

CIA, Robert Bigman; former member of the U.S.

Military’s Joint Special Operations Command

(JSOC), Geoff Hancock; and former head of the

Israel National Cyber Bureau and veteran of Israeli

military intelligence, Rami Efrati. Sepio Systems’

cybersecurity software has been adopted by

several banks, telecom and insurance companies,

including in the U.S. and Brazil.

Pardo is not the only prominent figure in Israel’s

intelligence community to compare Israeli

intelligence agencies to tech start-ups. Shin Bet

Director Nadav Argaman described Israel’s

domestic spy agency in similar terms. “The Shin

Bet is like an evolving start-up, with unmatched

strength,” Argaman stated in a June 2017 speech,

as he extolled the agency’s use of “pre-crime”

technology to detain Palestinians based on their

social media activity.

Argaman, at the time, claimed that more than

2,000 Palestinians, whom he described as

“potential lone-wolf terrorists,” had been arrested

as a result of these “breakthrough technological

advances” that use artificial-intelligence algorithms

to monitor the social media accounts of

Palestinians, especially younger Palestinians, for

the use of “tripwire” phrases that have been used

by Palestinians who later committed acts of

violence. In the case of those who use such terms,

“their phones are tracked to see if they meet other

suspects, or leave their districts to move towards

potential Israeli targets. In such cases, security

forces detain the suspect,” according to a 2017

report on the practice by The Economist.

The road to fascism, paved by a corrupted PROMIS

Though Israeli intelligence’s interest in tech

companies goes back several years, there is a well-

documented history of Israeli intelligence using

bugged software to surveil and gain “backdoor”

access to government databases around the world,

particularly in the United States.

As was mentioned in Part III of MintPress’ Epstein

series, a sinister yet cunning plan was executed to

place a backdoor for Israeli intelligence into the

Prosecutor’s Management Information System

(PROMIS) software, which was then being used by

the U.S. Department of Justice and was the envy of

government agencies, particularly intelligence

agencies, around the world. This bugged version of

PROMIS — born out of the collusion between Earl

Brian, Ronald Reagan’s then-envoy to Iran, and

Rafi Eitan, then-director of the now-defunct Israeli

13

intelligence agency Lekem — was seeded around

the world by Brian’s company Hadron as well as by

Mossad-linked media mogul Robert Maxwell, father

of Jeffrey Epstein’s long-time girlfriend and alleged

madam, Ghislaine Maxwell.

After this first PROMIS “backdoor” was discovered,

Israel would again gain access to sensitive U.S.

government communications, as well as civilian

communications, thanks to the collusion between

Israeli intelligence and Israeli telecom and tech

companies, especially Amdocs and Comverse

Infosys (now Verint), that were operating

throughout the United States. Today, Unit 8200-

linked start-ups appear to have taken up the torch.

While the PROMIS software is perhaps best known

for offering Israeli intelligence a backdoor into as

many as 80 intelligence agencies and other

sensitive locations around the world for nearly a

decade, it was also used for a very different

purpose by prominent officials linked to Iran-

Contra.

One key Iran-Contra figure — Lt. Col. Oliver North,

then serving on the National Security Council —

decided to use PROMIS neither for espionage nor

for foreign policy. Instead, North turned PROMIS’

power against Americans, particularly perceived

dissidents, a fact that remained unknown for years.

Beginning in 1982, as part of the highly classified

Continuity of Government (COG) program, North

used the PROMIS software at a 6,100-square-foot

“command center” in the Department of Justice, as

well as at a smaller operations room at the White

House, to compile a list of American dissidents and

“potential troublemakers” if the COG protocol was

ever invoked.

According to a senior government official with a

high-ranking security clearance and service in five

presidential administrations who spoke to Radar in

2008, this was:

A database of Americans, who, often for the

slightest and most trivial reason, are considered

unfriendly, and who, in a time of panic might be

incarcerated. The database can identify and locate

perceived ‘enemies of the state’ almost

instantaneously.”

In 1993, Wired described North’s use of PROMIS in

compiling this database as follows:

Using PROMIS, sources point out, North could have

drawn up lists of anyone ever arrested for a

political protest, for example, or anyone who had

ever refused to pay their taxes. Compared to

PROMIS, Richard Nixon’s enemies list or Sen. Joe

McCarthy’s blacklist look downright crude.”

The COG program defined this “time of panic” as “a

national crisis, such as nuclear war, violent and

widespread internal dissent, or national opposition to a

US military invasion abroad,” whereby the government

would suspend the Constitution, declare martial

law, and incarcerate perceived dissidents and other

“unfriendlies” in order to prevent the government’s

(or then-serving administration’s) overthrow.

This secretive database has often been referred to

as “Main Core” by government insiders and, most

troubling of all, it still exists today. Journalist Christ

Ketcham, citing senior government officials,

reported in 2008 that, at that time, Main Core was

believed to contain the names of as many as 8

million Americans. Eleven years later, it is highly

likely that the number of Americans included in the

Main Core database has grown considerably.

Author and investigative journalist Tim Shorrock

also covered other disturbing aspects of the

evolution of Main Core back in 2008 for Salon. At

the time, Shorrock reported that the George W.

Bush administration was believed to have used

Main Core to guide its domestic surveillance

activities following the September 11 attacks.

Citing “several former U.S. government officials

with extensive knowledge of intelligence

operations,” Shorrock further noted that Main Core

— as it was 11 years ago at the time his report was

published — was said to contain “a vast amount of

personal data on Americans, including NSA

intercepts of bank and credit card transactions and

the results of surveillance efforts by the FBI, the

CIA and other agencies.”

Bill Hamilton, former NSA intelligence officer and

the original creator of the PROMIS software, told

Shorrock at the time that he believed that “U.S.

intelligence uses PROMIS as the primary software

for searching the Main Core database” and had

been told as much by an intelligence official in

1992 and an NSA official in 1995. Dan Murphy,

former deputy director at the CIA, had told

Hamilton that the NSA’s use of PROMIS was “so

seriously wrong that money alone cannot cure the

problem.” “I believe in retrospect that Murphy was

alluding to Main Core,” Hamilton had told

Shorrock.

Though most reporting on Main Core, from the time

its existence was first revealed to the present, has

treated the database as something used by the

U.S. government and U.S. intelligence for domestic

purposes, MintPress has learned that Israeli

intelligence was also involved with the creation of

the Main Core database. According to a former U.S.

intelligence official with direct knowledge of the

U.S. intelligence community’s use of PROMIS and

Main Core from the 1980s to 2000s, Israeli

intelligence played a role in the U.S. government’s

deployment of PROMIS as the software used for the

Main Core domestic surveillance database system.

Israeli intelligence remained involved with Main

Core at the time of the August 1991 death of

journalist Danny Casolaro, who was investigating

not only the government’s misuse of the stolen

PROMIS software but also the Main Core database.

14

This same official, who chose to remain

anonymous, told MintPress that, shortly before his

death, Casolaro had obtained copies of computer

printouts from the PROMIS-based Main Core

domestic surveillance database system from NSA

whistleblower Alan Standorf, who was found

murdered a few months before Casolaro’s lifeless

body would be found in a West Virginia hotel room.

The source also stated that Main Core’s contents

had been used for the political blackmail of

members of Congress and their staff, journalists,

and others by Walter Raymond, a senior CIA covert

operator in psyops and disinformation who served

on President Reagan’s National Security Council

during and after Main Core’s creation. If used for

this purpose by Raymond in the 1980s, Main Core

has also likely been used by other individuals with

access to the database for blackmailing purposes in

the years since.

Given that Israeli intelligence was known to have

placed a backdoor into the PROMIS software,

before it was marketed and sold around the world

by Earl Brian and Robert Maxwell, its role in the

U.S. government’s decision to use PROMIS in the

creation of Main Core suggests that Israeli

intelligence likely advocated for the version of

PROMIS containing this backdoor, thereby giving

Israeli intelligence access to Main Core. Given that

Reagan aides and officials colluded with Israeli

“spymaster” Rafi Eitan in his efforts to create a

backdoor into the software for Israeli military

intelligence, the use of this version of PROMIS in

the Main Core database is certainly plausible.

Furthermore, the fact that Israeli intelligence was

known to be involved in Main Core nearly a decade

after its creation suggests that Israeli intelligence

may have played a role in certain aspects of the

database, such as the criteria used to flag

Americans as “unfriendly,” and — like Walter

Raymond — may have used information in the

database to blackmail Americans. In addition, the

fact that the cooperation between U.S. and Israeli

intelligence, particularly between Unit 8200 and the

NSA, has only grown since 1991 further suggests

that Israeli involvement in Main Core continues to

the present.

While Main Core’s very existence is troubling for

many reasons, the alleged involvement of a foreign

intelligence service in the creation, expansion and

maintenance of a database with personal details

and potentially damaging information on millions of

Americans targeted for detention or increased

surveillance in times of crisis is chilling. It is

especially so considering that the Trump

administration’s latest proposals to prevent mass

shootings before they occur are likely to use Main

Core to flag certain Americans for increased

surveillance or potentially detention, as was done

by the George W. Bush administration following the

September 11 attacks.

It appears that Main Core serves a dual purpose;

first as a mass targeted surveillance system to

crush dissent during times of “national crisis” —

whether spontaneous or engineered — and,

second, as a massive blackmail database used to

keep every potential opponent in line during non-

emergencies.

Peter Thiel’s Seeing Stone

As was mentioned earlier in this report, Palantir —

the company co-founded by Peter Thiel — is set to

profit handsomely from the Trump administration’s

plans to use its “pre-crime” technology, which is

already used by police departments throughout the

country and also used to track Americans based on

the company’s integrative data-mining approach.

Palantir, named for the “seeing stones” in the Lord

of the Rings novels, also markets software to

foreign (and domestic) intelligence agencies that

predicts the likelihood that an individual will

commit an act of terrorism or violence.

Aside from its “pre-crime” products, Palantir has

come under fire in recent years as a result of the

company’s contracts with Immigration and

Customs Enforcement (ICE), where it created an

intelligence system known as Investigative Case

Management (ICM). The IB Times described ICM as

“a vast ‘ecosystem’ of data to help immigration

officials in identifying targets and creating cases

against them” and also “provides ICE agents with

access to databases managed by other federal

agencies.” ICM further gives ICE access to “targets’

personal and sensitive information, such as

background on schooling, employment, family

relationships, phone records, immigration history,

biometrics data, criminal records as well as home

and work addresses.” In other words, Palantir’s

ICM is essentially a “Main Core” for immigrants.

Notably, part of Oliver North’s original intentions in

“Main Core” was to track immigrants then coming

from Central America as well as Americans who

opposed Reagan era policy with respect to Central

America. At that time, Main Core was believed to

be controlled by the Federal Emergency

Management Administration (FEMA), which is now

part of the Department of Homeland Security

(DHS).

VICE News reported in July that the Northern

California Regional Intelligence Center, which is run

by DHS, “serves around 300 communities in

northern California and is what is known as a

‘fusion center,’ a Department of Homeland Security

intelligence center that aggregates and investigates

information from state, local, and federal agencies,

as well as some private entities, into large

databases that can be searched using software like

Palantir. “ VICE further noted that this center alone

used Palantir to surveil as many as 8 million

Ameicans. There are many more such DHS “fusion

centers” throughout the United States.

15

If the Trump administration moves forward with its

proposal of employing technology to detect

potential mass shooters before they strike,

Palantir’s technology is set to be used, given that it

has already been used by U.S. law enforcement

and U.S. intelligence to determine which people run

“the highest risk of being involved in gun violence,”

according to an investigation of Palantir by The

Verge. Furthermore, Palantir’s close ties to the

Trump administration make

the company’s role in a

future nationwide “pre-

crime” prevention system

based on technology appear

inevitable.

Palantir founder Peter Thiel listens to Trump during a meeting at Trump Tower in New York, Dec. 14, 2016. Evan Vucci | AP

Worse still is the apparent overlap between Palantir

and Main Core. Palantir — which has obvious

similarities to PROMIS — is already known to use

its software to track potential terror threats,

including domestic terror threats, and a category of

people it refers to as “subversives.” Palantir’s

tracking of these individuals “is all done using

prediction.” Palantir’s close ties to the U.S.

intelligence community suggest that Palantir may

already have access to the Main Core database.

Tim Shorrock told MintPress that Palantir’s use of

Main Core is “certainly possible,” particularly in

light of the company’s use of the term “subversive”

to describe a category of people that its software

tracks.

Palantir also has alleged ties to Israeli intelligence,

as there have long been suspicions that Israeli

intelligence has used Palantir as part of its AI “pre-

crime” algorithms targeting Palestinians after

Palantir opened a research and development (R&D)

center in Israel in 2013. The current head of

Palantir Israel, Hamultal Meridor, previously

founded a brain-machine interface organization and

was senior director of web intelligence at Verint

(formerly Comverse Infosys), which has deep

connections to Unit 8200, a history of espionage in

the United States and was one of the two

companies contracted by the NSA to insert a

“backdoor” into the U.S. telecommunications

system and popular products of major American

tech companies.

Given the above, Peter Thiel’s 2018 decision to

fund Carbyne, the Unit 8200-linked start-up that

markets itself as a technological solution to mass

shootings in the U.S., strongly suggests that Thiel

has been anticipating for some time the now-public

efforts of the Trump administration to employ “pre-

crime” technology to track and target Americans

who show signs of “mental illness” and “violent

tendencies.”

A nightmare even Orwell could not have predicted

In early August, in the wake of the shooting at an

El Paso Walmart, President Trump called on big

tech companies to collaborate with the Justice

Department in the creation of software that “stops

mass murders before they start” by detecting

potential mass shooters before they cnm act.

Though Trump’s ideas were short on specifics,

there is now a new proposal that would create a

new government agency that will use data

gathered from civilian electronic devices to identify

“neurobehavioral” warning signs, thereby flagging

“potential shooters” for increased surveillance and

potentially detention.

This new agency, as proposed by the foundation

led by former NBC Universal president and vice

chairman of General Electric Robert Wright, would

be known as the Health Advanced Research

Projects Agency (HARPA) and would be modeled

after the Defense Advanced Research Projects

Agency (DARPA). Per the proposal, recently

detailed by the Washington Post, the flagship

program of HARPA would be “Safe Home”

(Stopping Aberrant Fatal Events by Helping

Overcome Mental Extremes), which would use

“breakthrough technologies with high specificity

and sensitivity for early diagnosis of

neuropsychiatric violence,” specifically “advanced

analytical tools based on artificial intelligence and

machine learning.”

The program would cost an estimated $60 million

over four years and would use data from “Apple

Watches, Fitbits, Amazon Echo and Google Home”

and other consumer electronic devices, as well as

information provided by health-care providers to

identify who may be a threat.

The Washington Post reported that President

Trump has reacted “very positively” to the proposal

and that he was “sold on the concept.” The Post

also noted that Wright sees the president’s

daughter, Ivanka, as “the most effective champion

of the proposal and has previously briefed her on

HARPA himself.” Ivanka has previously been cited

as a driving force behind some of her father’s policy

decisions, including his decision to bomb Syria after

an alleged chemical weapons attack in 2017.

Liz Fed — president of the Susan Wright

Foundation, which is led by Robert Wright and

created the proposal for HARPA and “Safe Home” —

told The Post that the proposal emulated DARPA

because “DARPA is a brilliant model that works.

They have developed the most transformational

capabilities in the world for national security…We’re

not leveraging the tools and technologies available

to us to improve and save lives.” Fed further

asserted that DARPA’s technological approach had

yet to be applied to the field of healthcare.

For anyone familiar with DARPA, such claims should

immediately sound loud alarm bells, especially

since DARPA is already developing its own solution

16

to “mental health” issues in the form of a “brain-

machine interface” as part of its N3 program. That

program, according to reports, involves

“noninvasive and ‘minutely’ invasive neural

interfaces to both read and write into the brain,”

help distance soldiers “from the emotional guilt of

warfare” by “clouding their perception” and “to

program artificial memories of fear, desire, and

experiences directly into the brain.” Though N3 is

intended to improve the prowess of American

soldiers, it is also set to be used as a means of

pursuing DARPA’s Systems-Based Neurotechnology

for Emerging Therapies (SUBNETS) project, which

aims to “to develop a tiny, implanted chip in the

skull to treat psychiatric disorders such as anxiety,

PTSD and major depression.”

Given that HARPA’s lead scientific adviser is Dr. Geoffrey Ling, former director and founder of DARPA’s Biological Technologies Office (BTO), which “merges biology,

engineering, and computer science to harness the power of natural systems for national security,” it seems likely that DARPA’s neurological-focused research programs,

like SUBNETS and N3, would be folded into HARPA’s portfolio, making the proposed agency’s approach to mental health very questionable indeed.

Aside from the dystopian nature of both DARPA and potentially HARPA’s approach to mental health, there is grave cause for concern regarding the Trump administration’s moves to address U.S. mass shooting

events by implementing pre-crime technology based on artificial intelligence, data-mining and mass surveillance,

technologies already laying in wait thanks to companies like Palantir and numerous Israeli tech start-ups led by

former Unit 8200 officers.

With companies like Carbyne — with its ties to both the Trump administration and to Israeli intelligence — and

the Mossad-linked Gabriel also marketing themselves as “technological” solutions to mass shootings while also doubling as covert tools for mass data collection and extraction, the end result is a massive surveillance

system so complete and so dystopian that even George Orwell himself could not have predicted it.

Following another catastrophic mass shooting or crisis event, aggressive efforts will likely follow to foist these “solutions” on a frightened American public by the very network connected, not only to Jeffrey Epstein, but to a litany of crimes and a frightening history of plans to

crush internal dissent and would-be dissenters in the United States.

Whitney Webb is a MintPress News journalist based in

Chile. She has contributed to several independent media outlets including Global Research, EcoWatch, the Ron Paul Institute and 21st Century Wire, among others. She has made several radio and television appearances and is the 2019 winner of the Serena Shim Award for Uncompromised Integrity in Journalism.

Republish our stories! MintPress News is licensed under a

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-

ShareAlike 3.0 International License.

* https://www.mintpressnews.com/cia-israel-mossad-

jeffrey-epstein-orwellian-nightmare/261692/

________________________________________________

The power and hypocrisy of George

Pell’s supporters Edition No. 267 August 24 – 30, 2019

As the Victorian Court of Appeal affirms the cardinal’s guilt, he retains dogged support from many in the conservative establishment. By Richard Cooke.

In an age when even amateur broadcasters can attain professional production values, few telecasts still look as

spartan as a real-life court proceeding. In prelude, the live feed from the Victorian Supreme Court presented only three empty seats, a state seal and a test soundtrack of tinkling piano music. As the judges filled those seats, the court website became inundated with viewers and crashed. Once restored, the video sometimes chopped or slowed under the weight of this

absent audience. Chief Justice Anne Ferguson’s delivery of the summary was halting as well – The Saturday Paper’s legal correspondent, Richard Ackland, tweeted that she brought “all the drama of a dead wombat to reading a summary of one of the most important criminal judgments of the year” – but this dour diction was, in its

way, more compelling than a mannered performance might have been. The ruling Ferguson delivered was brief, clear and surprising – George Pell’s appeal on child sexual assault charges had failed.

“It is fair to say that his case has divided the community,” said Ferguson, and so it divided the court. There were three grounds of appeal. One was that the

defence had been unable to submit an animation, since nicknamed “the Pac-Man video”, purporting to show that

the offending inside St Patrick’s Cathedral, Melbourne,

was impossible. This was dismissed unanimously.

So, too, was concern that Pell’s not guilty plea had been entered via video link only, and not in the presence of

the jury. But on the most important question, of whether an “unsafe verdict” had been delivered, there was dissent. Justice Weinberg felt the evidence of the complainant, upon which the case hinged, was not satisfactory enough to preclude reasonable doubt. His colleagues disagreed. They found “A”, as he was called in the summary, was “not a liar, was not a fantasist and

was a witness of the truth”. It was reasonable for the jury to believe him.

The microphones recorded only silence from the gallery, and it was possible to forget the rest of those present: the press and lawyers, the survivors and supporters, and Cardinal Pell himself – he is not yet Mr Pell – who had

arrived to court in a prison van, and would leave by the same means. Depending on their vantage point, court reporters said Pell “barely reacted” to the ruling, was “gripping the dock with his left hand and looking down at the floor”, looked “destroyed” or merely pursed his lips. Abuse survivors thanked the Lord for a decision many thought even more consequential than the cardinal’s

earlier guilty verdict.

Media and legal circles had tipped a different result, partly because of matters of law, and partly because of a cruder calculus – that elite power is so seldom brought to lasting accountability. There might yet be another appeal to the High Court by special leave, but “A”, or Witness J as he is better known, has already run an unusually long

17

and vigorous gauntlet. He waited many years to speak to police, only doing so when the other choirboy abused by

Pell died of a heroin overdose. It was at his former schoolfriend’s funeral that he decided to seek justice. As other cases prepared against Pell fell away, it was his

that proceeded to trial. The first jury was unable to deliver a verdict. The second believed his version of events over the cardinal’s. Now two Supreme Court justices have made the same determination.

Ferguson stressed the court’s decision was not a mere matter of law: it was a matter of fact. The judges had consulted the same evidence as the jury, so they could decide whether those 12 citizens were in a position to render a safe verdict. The Court of Appeal had reviewed many hours of video testimony and cross-examination and visited the sacristy and the corridor where the

offending took place. In particular, they closely examined vestments identical to the ones Pell was wearing on the date of the crimes. These items of clothing had also been available to the jury, and the defence had imbued them

with almost otherworldly qualities, pretending they were impervious to shifting or parting by human hands once

donned. Not surprisingly, both the jury and judges discovered that these garments were entirely ordinary, not de facto chastity belts.

But the defence was only doing what it could, and after the verdict was upheld, Witness J had a statement delivered, via a representative, in which he was magnanimous. Few witnesses cross-examined by a silk

who costs $20,000 a day are thankful for the experience. Witness J is an exception. “I am glad he has had the best legal representation that money can buy,” the statement said of Pell’s team. “There are a lot of checks and balances in the criminal justice system and the appeals process is one of them.” Witness J also reserved some misgivings for “commentators” and “punditries”. His

words for Pell’s defenders outside the courtroom could have been unkinder still. Some lay Catholics will not believe the verdict, but some lay Catholics once decided a Coogee fence post contained a divine presence: the ordinary faithful should not be judged too harshly. Those “commentators” are less deserving of mercy.

Australia’s conservative organs have almost all embraced a mythology, by turns unhinged and incoherent, that seeks to turn Pell from an offender into a martyr. Before the summary was even publicly available, columnists were filing stories that decried a miscarriage of justice. This followed a pattern established long before the guilty verdict. In The Australian, John Ferguson indulged his

talent for melodrama by suggesting Anne Ferguson had delivered a “death sentence”. Did Pell’s condemners not

know the door of the sacristy was unlocked? The appeal judges noted that other similar cases of abuses had occurred in places that carried a high risk of discovery. Did they not know the robes were heavy? The judges had, of course, tried them on. Did they not know Pell had

never been accused before? In fact, accusations have followed him his whole career – the church itself had already conducted a 2002 investigation into groping claims.

Still they harped on about the cardinal’s role in the Melbourne Response, a “world-first innovation” in the

Catholic Church’s response to child abuse. Pell was establishing it at almost the exact time he was raping choirboys. Was it really conceivable he should be leading the charge against child abuse, and committing it at the

same time? Well, yes. Among survivor groups, the Response quickly became notorious for its mean-

spiritedness and tight-fistedness. It spent substantially more on lawyers than it did on compensation. While fighting a claim made by an abused altar boy, John Ellis,

the church made a novel and successful legal argument to limit payouts – as a legal entity it does not exist, and so cannot be sued. The Melbourne Response was not a good-faith effort to deal with child abuse in the church: it

simulated action, while stymieing it at the same time. It also gave an abuser a smokescreen.

It was the same institutions that turned the conservative

establishment Catholic and incubated an unparalleled

epidemic of child sexual abuse. As power grew, so did

abuse, abetted by a deference to authority and the rites

of tradition.

In the world of Pell’s defenders, it is not the church that has conducted biased investigations, but the police. And the venom ordinarily aimed at offenders is instead

directed at the journalists who reported on them. A

conspiracy theory combines the two. After the appeal, an anonymous poster on the libertarian blog Catallaxy Files wrote that “the degree of joint enterprise by Victoria Police and the ABC is not known at this time”, calling them “conjoined twins”. The theory goes that the police, exhibiting a previously unexhibited anti-Catholic animus,

trawled for victims, and then the ABC, through 7.30 reporter Louise Milligan, brain-poisoned the jury. No proof or evidence of this “enterprise” is offered or required: the conviction of the cardinal is by itself proof positive. Even this theory is more reality-based than that favoured by Quadrant, though, where Keith Windschuttle is blaming the whole episode on American-based

reporting by Rolling Stone magazine.

There is a temptation to write off such sentiments as

skunk spray emitted in self-defence, but these are not isolated ideologues. A more finessed version of the same – “What we have witnessed is a combined effort by much of the media, including Australia’s public broadcaster, and elements of Victoria’s law enforcement agency, to

systematically blacken the name of someone before he went to trial” – has been offered by the vice-chancellor of the Australian Catholic University, Greg Craven. Craven instructed his staff not to comment on the trial until all avenues of appeal had been exhausted, then provided a personal character reference for Pell and authored a

post-conviction column in The Catholic Weekly headlined “Poisoning the well of justice”. The Pell Centre at the ACU’s Ballarat campus retains its name, and the staff muzzle remains in place.

Like many of his ilk, Craven cannot restrict himself to a single epithet when referencing Milligan’s book, Cardinal. It is a “hopelessly biased, ill-written, ungrammatical and

poorly proof-read volume”. In the time since the book was commissioned by Melbourne University Press, the university’s chancellor, Allan Myers, QC, derided MUP’s tendency to publish “airport trash”, opening a rift with the MUP board that saw four of its directors resign in January. Myers had previously represented Pell as counsel.

Even by the low and gendered standards of Australian public life, the attacks on Milligan, the only journalist to meet and interview Witness J, have been extraordinary. The book resulted in Milligan herself being cross-examined for six-and-a-half hours, during which Pell’s

18

counsel, Robert Richter, suggested she had flirted with an accuser during an interview. “I think it is an

absolutely sexist assertion,” she responded.

“Without a doubt this is the toughest story I have ever done,” Milligan later told the ABC. “This is a person who

had immense political and cultural power so taking that on is enormous and very, very stressful… Being at the centre of this storm, it doesn’t get any harder than that as a journalist.” Echoing this duress, the reporter who

broke the story of the Pell police investigation in the Herald Sun, Lucie Morris-Marr, said the effort had “nearly destroyed” her, and that she had been through “hell”. Andrew Bolt, her own paper’s columnist, tried to undermine her scoop by falsely claiming it had originated with a police leak, a “leak” that was subsequently referred to an anti-corruption investigation. Morris-Marr

made an internal complaint about the Bolt column and claims News Corp responded by pushing her out. Just months after she produced a world-first exclusive, Morris-Marr was told there was “no money” left for her

contract.

Pell himself was a columnist for The Sunday Telegraph,

and a friend of News’s proprietor, Rupert Murdoch. There have been suggestions this close relationship may have prompted Bolt’s about-face on the cardinal, which had once been far more critical. When Pell gave evidence about the Ballarat paedophile Gerald Ridsdale to the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Bolt wrote that the testimony would “stain

his reputation forever” and that Pell would be remembered as “the priest who went by the book, not the heart”. Bolt then changed his mind and conducted an exclusive interview with Pell on Sky News. This is not evidence of an enterprise, however, and as so often with the Murdoch empire, no direct instruction is required. It is more indicative of the changing cultural and religious

currents at the heart of conservatism, without which the reaction to the Pell case cannot be understood.

“ ‘Catholicism’ is now a dirty word in Australia,” wrote

Paul Collins in the National Catholic Reporter, “and as in most Anglophone countries there’s deep-seated sectarian bigotry against Catholics which surfaces in times like these.” But for anyone familiar with Australian history, it was the diminishing of sectarian bigotry that was noteworthy. The old divisions that had defined other famous Australian legal matters, such as the divorce case

of the Test cricketer Arthur Coningham, who attended court armed with a revolver and the support of the Orange Order, were gone. So was any Protestant crowing. Only the trial’s title kept a vestige of the old animosity between Windsor and Rome: George Pell v The

Queen.

As late as 1950, publications as anodyne as The Methodist called the battle between Catholicism and Protestantism in Australia an unceasing “war”, that would continue “as long as men are even partially free, and as long as they retain an interest in the vital things of the Christian faith”. By the 1970s, the war was virtually over, the two sects declaring an ecumenical truce to combat

secularism and socialism. Australia also took a different direction from the United States in this mid-century

period. There, legal challenges enforced increasing secularisation of the publicly funded school system. Here,

by contrast, the state began funding Catholic institutions in earnest. Controversies over the Eucharist and the order of precedence feel antiquated now, but the

ambivalence, scepticism and outright hostility that greeted the foundation institutions, such as the ACU, have lodged in folk memory.

After centuries as a bullied minority, Catholicism now has

more adherents in Australia than Anglicanism, and the ruling Liberal Party has changed its predilections, from culturally Protestant into culturally Catholic. These reversals were once unthinkable, and the conservative Catholic ascendancy is at the core of the Pell response. Because it was the same institutions, operating in the same mode of fresh ambition, that turned the

conservative establishment Catholic and simultaneously incubated an unparalleled epidemic of child sexual abuse. As power grew, so did abuse, abetted by a deference to authority and the rites of tradition.

This is why Pell’s conviction has been so humiliating not only for the church, but also for the Australian

conservative establishment more generally. Often Pell is referred to as “the third-highest ranked priest in the Vatican”, but this overlooks the prelates’ place in international right-wing hierarchy. He joins a select few Australians to attain a level of first-rank international success. In the political realm, only Rupert Murdoch matches him, and they have the simpatico relations of

two men meeting in the middle – in the Murdoch papers, Pell broke with church doctrine on global warming; Murdoch, the grandson of a Presbyterian minister, was awarded a papal knighthood for his “unblemished character”. Both Murdoch and his close friend Robert Thomson, the chief executive of News Corp, are not Catholic converts but they are raising their children as

Catholics.

These changes cannot be reversed or apologised for. They can only be double or tripled down on, and in some quarters the accusations register only as a new retelling of an old canard: that the Roman church is riddled with sex crimes, refuses to succumb to secular law and

operates schools for nefarious purposes. Accountability, like truth, will take time to sink in. Those charges are defended against almost reflexively, and with new allies.

But the facts, when stated, are stark. George Pell’s Wikipedia entry now begins like this: “George Pell AC (born 8 June 1941) is an Australian convicted

child sex offender and prelate of the Catholic Church”. The most imminent

edit is the removal of that “AC”.

This article was first published in the print edition of The Saturday Paper on Aug 24, 2019 as "The power and hypocrisy of George Pell’s supporters". Subscribe here.

Richard Cooke is a contributing editor to The Monthly, and the Mumbrella Publish Award Columnist of the Year.

*https://www.thesaturdaypaper.com.au/news/politics/2019/08/24/the-power-and-hypocrisy-george-pells-supporters/15665688008647

__________________________________________________ The following illustrates how democratic Germany treats its Nationalist Holocaust Questioners, but remember Germany still does not have a PEACE TREATY that would end WWII hostilities, and is thus technically still at war with major and minor global national players.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

19

September 1, 1939 - Outbreak of World War II On September 1, 1939, Hitler invaded Poland from the west; two days later, France and Britain declared

war on Germany, beginning World War II. On September 17, Soviet troops invaded Poland from the east. =============================================================

Ursula Haverbeck, 90, and Horst Mahler, 83, sit in prison for denying the “Holocaust”, i.e. denying the existence of the homicidal gas chambers; the actual law rejects “Holocaust” as a legal term and defines §130 as “defaming the memory of the dead”. Note, only the non-German dead are to be remembered while Germany’s Bundeskanzler floods Germany & Europe with criminal invaders who receive free housing/welfare benefits, thereby fulfilling ther European Union’s imperative to turn the continent into a multi-cultural entity, i.e. the racial European

genocide program. ------------------------------------------------------------------

We refuse to be a ‘normal country’ if it means US-style bombings & invasions, Moscow tells Pentagon

Otherwise, we should have been acting like the US, bombing Iraq and Libya in blatant violation of

international law… We should have supported coups, violent and anti-constitutional, like the US and its

closest allies did in February 2014 [in Ukraine]. - Published time: 9 Sep, 2019 16:04

* https://www.rt.com/news/468423-pentagon-russia-normal-country

----------------------------------------------------------------------

SOME TRIVIA …

Breck Dumas , August 16, 2019

Swedish teen's 'zero-

carbon yacht' trip to

New York is not so

green after all.It's

been revealed that

trans-Atlantic flights

will be required for

the crew

Kirsty Wigglesworth -

WPA Pool/Getty Images

Sixteen-year-old Swedish eco-campaigner Greta Thunberg is currently on her way across the Atlantic ocean on a zero-carbon

yacht, headed for New York to address the United Nations regarding climate change policy. But the two-week voyage that's been widely-hailed for its environmentally-friendly mode of travel has now fallen under scrutiny, as it has been revealed that carbon-guzzling trans-Atlantic flights will be utilized by the boat's crew for the round trip.

What are the details? Miss Thunberg has garnered international attention for environmental initiatives, and was even nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in March. She told The New York Times ahead of her journey across the ocean on the boat Maliza II, "By doing this it also shows how impossible it is today to live sustainable. That, in order to travel with zero emissions, that we have to sail like this across the Atlantic Ocean." Apparently, it's even more impossible to travel without a carbon footprint than some might have imagined. The Times of London revealed Friday that Thunberg's solar-powered yacht trip "may generate more emissions than it saves because of flights taken by the crew."

The Times reported that two sailors will be flying into New York to man the 60-foot vessel back to Europe, and two of the crew members currently on the yacht may fly home. According to a spokeswoman for Team Mazila, "We added the trip to New York City at very short notice, and as a result two people need to fly over to the U.S. in order to bring the boat back," the Daily Mail reported. "The world has not yet found a way to make it possible to cross an ocean without a carbon footprint."

Anything else? Thunberg has been campaigning for all countries to "cut emissions in line with the Paris climate accord," CBS News reported. When the teenager was asked if she would be open to meeting with President Donald Trump during her visit to the U.S., she said, "Why should I waste time talking to him when he, of course, is not going to listen to me?" * https://www.theblaze.com/news/swedish-teens-zero-carbon-yacht-trip-to-new-york-is-not-so-green-after-all

________________________________________________

20

ES GEHT JETZT UM ALLES!

von Gerd Ittner

Etwas geht vor in diesem Land, eine ganz neue, ganz

eigenartige Stimmung breitet sich aus, und möglicherweise

bahnt sich ein ganz entscheidender Umschwung an: Immer

mehr Menschen wachen jetzt auf und haben das Gefühl, daß

etwas ganz und gar nicht stimmt in und mit dieser BRD. "Kann

es sein, daß wir seit 1945 derart ausgeplündert,

ausgenommen, hintergangen, übervorteilt, entrechtet,

aber vor allem so BELOGEN und BETROGEN wurden und

werden, wie noch kein anderes Volk auf dieser Erde", so

fragen sie sich. Sie beginnen, die Dinge um die BRD immer

weiter zu hinterfragen - gerade auch deshalb, weil sie für sich

erkannt haben, daß die "Lügenpresse", welche die Dinge in einer

entsprechenden Weise darstellt und sie manipulierend verdreht,

tatsächlich eine Lügenpresse ist, und die Politik eine solche des

Volksbetrugs und Volksverrats. (Eine Politik, welche doch dem

Wohl des Volkes, des DEUTSCHEN VOLKES dienen sollte, die

aber bereits den Begriff des "Volkes", und gar des "Deutschen

Volkes" überhaupt nicht mehr verwendet, ihn tabuisiert und

regelrecht kriminalisiert und nur noch von "Bevölkerung" und

"Gesellschaft" spricht.)

Jene sich der Denknarkose durch Umerziehung und

Dauerbekeulung mit Totschlagbegriffen ("Rechter", "Nazi",

"Reichsbürger" etc.) entzogen habenden Wachdeutschen stellen

Fragen hinsichtlich der Legitimation der BRD. Sie fragen sich, ob

die BRD wirklich ihr Staat ist, ob diese überhaupt ein Staat im

eigentlichen Sinne ist. Das wird von der Lügenpresse hetzerisch

verdreht in, daß diese Aufgewachten und Fragen Stellenden

behaupteten, die BRD würde nicht existieren. Doch das

behaupten diese nicht - es geht wie gesagt um die Frage der

Legitimation der BRD, darum, wie diese und als was eigentlich

sie existiert, und ob sie unterdessen nicht vielleicht in

enscheidenden Bereichen zum "Gegenentwurf" dessen geworden

ist, für was das Grundgesetz und die BRD dereinst geschaffen

wurden: nämlich einzig und allein für das DEUTSCHE VOLK,

mit dem Auftrag ihrer, des Besatzungskonstrukts Auflösung,

durch die Wiederherstellung der staatlichen Einheit und

Handlungsfähigkeit des Deutschen Reiches, einschließlich

seines Staatsgebietes jenseits von Oder und Neiße, und

einer Verfassungsgebung durch das DEUTSCHE VOLK in

freier Selbstbestimmung gemäß des Artikels 146 des unter

Fremdbestimmung entstandenen Besatzungsstatuts

Grundgesetz - wohlgemerkt nicht "der", sondern "für" die -

Bundesrepublik Deutschland.

Und das System wird unruhig... Es reagiert immer hysterischer

und brutaler gegenüber Menschen, welche völlig gewaltlos

dissidente Ansichten vertreten, welche die Dinge hinterfragen.

(Mich hat man sogar - widersinniger geht es nicht mehr - wegen

des Äußerns in der BRD unerwünschter Ansichten gewaltsam

aus dem Ausland hierher geholt! Also ausgerechnet dorthin, wo

die von mir vertretenen Ansichten doch nicht erwünscht sind...)

Man hat eigens ein Etikett erfunden, um es Menschen zu

verpassen, welche herauszufinden versuchen und auch

herausgefunden haben, was mit der BRD nicht stimmt - dieses

Etikett heißt "Reichsbürger"

"Wie gefährlich sind Reichsbürger?", schlagzeilt die Hetz- und

Lügenpresse dauerthemamäßig. Doch "Wie gefährlich sind

Asylbewerber und Migranten?", diese Schlagzeile liest man dort

nie, auch wenn Deutsche von solchen in einer vordem im Alltag

hierzulande nie gekannten Brutalität und Anzahl abgeschlachtet,

niedergemetzelt, vergewaltigt, zu Krüppeln geschlagen,

ausgeraubt, beleidigt, bespuckt und gedemütigt werden, wenn

Deutsche, und selbst Kinder, von ins Land des Deutschen Volkes

gekommenen Mördern in Bahnhöfen vor Züge gestoßen werden

und damit ganzen Familien das Leben für immer zerstört wird!

Diesbezüglich bleibt es ganz leise und sehr verhalten im

Lügenblätterwald des antideutschen Schmierenjournalismus.

Aber wehe, wehe, wehe, ein Deutscher sagt ein politisch nicht

"korrektes" Wort... Doch die sich von diesem Betrieb noch

nicht völlig verblöden lassen habenden Menschen im

Lande bemerken das durchaus! Und immer mehr

erkennen, was hier gespielt wird. Ein blutiges,

mörderisches Spiel zulasten eines ganzen Volkes!

Besonders beliebt bei jener Journaille ist es, nicht

selbsternannten, sondern von den Systemmedien so genannten

"Reichsbürgern" Aussagen zu unterstellen, um diese dann

vermeintlich zu "widerlegen".

Aber was haben diese Medien und deren "Experten" zu einer

nachprüfbaren Rechtslage zu sagen - zum Beispiel zur

deutschen Staatsangehörigkeit? Wie heißt diese denn

KONKRET, mit dem vollen Namen des sie bildenden

Staates, wenn eine Staatsangehörigkeit der BRD nun

einmal nicht existiert? Und auch nicht existieren kann, da mit

der BRD laut Parlamentarischem Rat ganz ausdrücklich kein

neuer, anderer Staat (als eben das völkerrechtlich

fortbestehende Deutsche Reich) gegründet wurde, sondern

lediglich ein Teil des deutschen Staates (Deutsches Reich) neu

organisiert wurde; und da die deutsche Staatsangehörigkeit

ausdrücklich die von vor der Schaffung der BRD fortbestehende

ist; und da diese deutsche Staatsangehörigkeit gemäß Artikel

116 Abs. 1 des Grundgesetzes räumlich vom Staatsgebiet des

Deutschen Reiches in den Grenzen vom 31. Dezember 1937*

bestimmt wird, welches ja nie zur BRD gehörte.

Vor allem aber: Woher sollte die bei fehlendem Friedensvertrag

und nicht gestrichenen Feindstaatenklauseln dem erklärten

Feindstaatenbündnis gegen Deutschland und das

Deutsche Volk beigetretene BRD(!) das Recht nehmen

wollen, Deutsche Menschen für sich zu "beschlagnahmen", die

sich mit dem vollen Recht der freien Selbstbestimmung und der

Rechtslage entsprechend darauf berufen, keine

Staatsangehörigkeit der BRD zu haben und mithin keine

Staatsangehörigen der BRD zu sein, und die der BRD

insbesondere auch keinen Treueid geleistet haben, sich

ihr gegenüber niemals zur Loyalität, zum Gehorsam und

zur Gefolgschaft verpflichtet haben?

Die Zeiten der Leibeigenschaft sind vorbei!

Wenn die - sich gerade auch aus dem Grundgesetz für die BRD

ergebende - Rechtslage erst entsprechend bewußtseinsbildend

bekannt wird im Deutschen Volk, dann wird es "eng" für die

Absichten werden, dieses Volk weiterhin mit einer

Staatssimulation zum Narren und unter Fremdherrschaft halten

(und durch eine "Replacement Migration" als solches

abschaffen) zu wollen.

So will man 1990 eine "Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands"

durchgeführt haben, welche rechtlich definiert ist als "Beitritt

des Gebietes der DDR zum Geltungsbereich des Grundgesetzes

am 3. Oktober 1990". Das heißt: dieser Beitritt ist niemals

rechtswirksam durchgeführt worden und konnte unter den

gegebenen Umständen auch nicht rechtswirksam durchgeführt

werden, da der Geltungsbereich des Grundgesetzes,

Artikel 23, am 3. Oktober 1990 überhaupt nicht mehr

existierte! Er war bereits vorher gestrichen, und das im

Bundesgesetzblatt verkündet worden. Selbstverständlich aber

kann einem am 3. Oktober 1990 nicht mehr bestehenden

Geltungsbereich des Grundgesetzes am 3. Oktober 1990

21

auch nicht mehr rechtswirksam beigetreten werden! Eine

Tatsache, die sich auch von "Experten" der BRD nicht

wegschwätzen läßt.

Doch selbst mit einem rechtswirksamen Beitritt

Mitteldeutschlands zum Geltungsbereich des Grundgesetzes der

BRD wäre der konstituierende, unabänderliche und

unaufgebbare Wiedervereinigungsauftrag desselben nicht

erfüllt gewesen. Denn wenn das Grundgesetz den

konstituierenden, unabänderlichen und unaufgebbaren Auftrag

zur Wiedervereinigung des ganzen Deutschlands gibt, dann

muß diesem Grundgesetz zur Umsetzung dieses Auftrags

auch zwingend eine Stelle mitgegeben worden sein, der

zu entnehmen ist, welches territoriale Gebiet das

Grundgesetz überhaupt unter dem

wiederzuvereinigenden ganzen Deutschland versteht. Und

die einzige Stelle im gesamten Grundgesetz, die das zu leisten

vermag, ist der Artikel 116 Abs. 1 - er nennt das Gebiet des

Deutschen Reiches in den Grenzen vom 31. Dezember 1937.

Und damit ist dieses das vom Grundgesetz gemeinte

Wiedervereinigungsgebiet des ganzen Deutschlands!

Es gibt im Grundgesetz keine andere Stelle als den Artikel 116

Abs. 1, der zu entnehmen wäre, welches räumliche deutsche

Staatsgebiet dieses mit seinem konstituierenden,

unabänderlichen und unaufgebbaren

Wiedervereinigungsauftrag meint. Insbesondere auch hat

das in diesem Gebiet wiederzuvereinigende deutsche Staatsvolk

laut Grundgesetz Artikel 116 Abs. 1 völlig offenkundig die

Staatsangehörigkeit des Deutschen Reiches (zumal eine

Staatsangehörigkeit der BRD nun einmal nie geschaffen wurde

und somit nicht existiert), räumlich definiert vom Staatsgebiet

des Deutschen Reiches in den Grenzen vom 31. Dezember

1937!

Und um eben das aus dem Bewußtsein des Deutschen Volkes zu

tilgen, bzw. um es ihm überhaupt nicht erst zu Bewußtsein

gelangen zu lassen, wurde 1990 der Geltungsbereich des

Grundgesetzes, Artikel 23, in überstürzter Hast um das

Verwischen von Spuren Bemühter aus dem Grundgesetz

gestrichen - aberwitzigerweise noch bevor das Gebiet der DDR

diesem Geltungsbereich beitreten sollte -, da dieser Artikel 23

hinsichtlich der Wiedervereinigung von den ANDEREN

TEILEN Deutschlands (nämlich den von den Grenzen des

Deutschen Reiches vom 31. Dezember 1937 umfaßten)

sprach, nicht lediglich vom ANDEREN TEIL Deutschlands

(der DDR)!

Somit ist ganz eindeutig offenkundig, welches ungeheuerliche

Hochverrats- und Betrugsverbrechen gegenüber dem

Deutschen Volk und seinem rechtmäßigen Staat - dem

Deutschen Reich - (aber auch gegenüber dem Grundgsetz und

seinem Wiedervereinigungsauftrag für das gesamte

Deutschland) 1990 begangen wurde und seither begangen

wird, indem man eine noch dazu niemals rechtswirksam

vollzogene, ledigliche Teilwiedervereinigung Westdeutschlands

mit Mitteldeutschland als Wiedervereinigung

Gesamtdeutschlands, als Erfüllung des sich aber eben gemäß

dieses Grundgesetzes ganz klar auf das Staatsgebiet des

Deutschen Reiches in den Grenzen vom 31. Dezember 1937

beziehenden konstituierenden, unabänderlichen und

unaufgebbaren Wiedervereinigungsauftrages ausgibt.

Doch immer mehr Deutsche wachen auf und durchschauen das

üble Spiel...

Mit reichs- und volkstreuen Grüßen

Gerd Ittner

* Zur Erläuterung: Das Staatsgebiet des Deutschen Reiches in

den Grenzen vom 31. Dezember 1937 ist dasjenige, welches

das Grundgesetz für die BRD selber nennt (also von wegen

das käme von den "Reichsbürgern"); völkerrechtlich stehen

allerdings auch andere Grenzverläufe des Deutschen

Reiches im Raum und zur Diskussion. Jedoch handelt es sich

hier um eine Frage, welche gegebenenfalls erst nach der

Wiederherstellung der Handlungsfähigkeit des Deutschen

Reiches von diesem selber mit dem dazu nötigen

Verhandlungsgewicht angegangen werden kann. Für jetzt ist es

unbedingt wichtig, um diese Dinge zu wissen, und sich

hinsichtlich dessen, was man selber praktisch umsetzen kann,

bewußt zu sein, daß die BRD nicht Deutschland, nicht unser

Deutschland ist. Vor allem ist von entscheidender Bedeutung,

daß eine Staatsangehörigkeit der BRD nicht existiert!

[http://rsv.daten-web.de/Germanien/keine_BRD-

Staatsbuergerschaft_LK_Demmin.pdf]

Daraus folgt: Wenn die BRD über keine eigene

Staatsangehörigkeit verfügt, verfügt sie klarerweise und

logisch zwingend auch über keinen einzigen eigenen

Staatsangehörigen und über kein eigenes Staatsvolk!

Hier ist der Hebel, an dem jeder einzelne ansetzen kann und im

Sinne nicht nur seiner freien Selbstbestimmung, sondern auch

der Selbsterhaltung (gegenüber einer Politik zur Abschaffung

Deutschlands und des Deutschen Volkes) ansetzen muß. - Das

heißt: Besteht gegenüber "Behörden" etc. der BRD darauf, daß

Ihr keine Staatsangehörigkeit der BRD habt und damit

keine Staatsangehörigen der BRD seid, und auch niemals

sein wollt - daß Ihr Euch von dieser nicht wie Leibeigene

als vermeintlich deren Staatsangehörige beschlagnahmen

und behandeln laßt! Macht geltend, daß Ihr der BRD

niemals einen Treueid geleistet habt; daß Ihr Euch der

BRD und deren Vertetern gegenüber nie in einer

Erklärung zur Loyalität, zur Gefolgschaft und zum

Gehorsam verpflichtet habt!

Vor allem: Bleibt in diesem mit unbeugsamem Willen und

Hartnäckigkeit im zivilen Ungehorsam zu führenden

Freiheits- und Befreiungskampf unbedingt gewaltlos! Geht

dem immer angeschlagener und wackeliger werdenden, und

deshalb immer wütender, hysterischer und brutaler um sich

schlagenden System nicht in die Gewaltfalle, welche dieses auch

durch von ihm installierte Provokateure und Anstifter auslegt.

Es müssen alle Alarmglocken läuten, wenn Euch jemand zu

gewalttätigen Aktionen überreden will. Der Gegner ist

materiell absolut übermächtig - wir können ihn nur mit

den Waffen schlagen, die ihm in seiner Verderbtheit,

Verlogenheit und Niedertracht nicht zur Verfügung

stehen: mit den Waffen des Geistes und innerer

Aufrichtigkeit!

Tretet dem System entgegen, als freie, selbstbestimmte

Deutsche Menschen, gewaltlos aber mit einem

entschlossenen und unbeugsamen "NEIN" zur BRD - denn

niemand hat das Recht, schon gleich gar keine BRD ohne

eigene Staatsangehörigkeit und damit ohne einen

einzigen eigenen Staatsangehörigen, freien

selbstbestimmten Deutschen Menschen vorzuschreiben,

zu was sie "ja", und zu was sie "nein" sagen dürfen! -

Diese Zeiten sind vorbei!

Im Jahre 2015, seit nunmehr vier Jahren, hat das "Merkel-

Regime" mit der grundgesetzwidrigen Flutungsöffnung der

Grenzen nicht nur das Deutsche Volk einer seither in deren

Brutalität und tagtäglichen Gegenwärtigkeit immer noch mehr

ausartenden Gewaltkriminalität durch viel zu oft illegal und

bereits dadurch als Straftäter in dessen Land kommende

angebliche "Schutzsuchende" ausgeliefert, sondern es hat damit

auch "DIE RECHTSSTAATLICHE ORDNUNG AUSSER KRAFT

22

GESETZT"! Diese insbesondere durch den Artikel 16a des

Grundgesetzes für die BRD offenkundig werdende Tatsache

wurde vom OLG Koblenz mit Urteil vom 14. Februar 2017 auch

gerichtlich festgestellt (Az. 13 UF 32/17).

Was aber sagt das Grundgesetz dazu, wenn Kriminelle in der

Politik - denn um was anderes sollte es sich bei Tätern eines

derart schwerwiegenden Verstoßes handeln? - die

rechtsstaatliche Ordnung beseitigen(!)? Ich wiederhole:

DIE RECHTSSTAATLICHE ORDNUNG BESEITIGEN! Es sagt

dazu, in seinem Artikel 20 Absatz 4: "Gegen jeden, der es

unternimmt, diese Ordnung zu beseitigen, haben alle

Deutschen das Recht zum Widerstand, wenn andere

Abhilfe nicht möglich ist".

Es geht jetzt um alles! Es geht um unser Vaterland! Es

geht um uns und um die Zukunft unserer Kinder und

Kindeskinder! ES GEHT UM UNSER DEUTSCHES VOLK!

Nürnberg, den 15. August 2019

*https://staging.bitchute.com/video/JbgeAiTV3rht/

____________________________________________________________________________

September 14, 2019 in video

* https://volkslehrer.info/videoarchiv/ein-schnitzer-kommt-selten-allein-wolfszeit-berlebenskurs-teil-2

9/11 After 18 Years

September 9, 2019 | Categories: Articles & Columns | Tags: | Print This Article

* https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2019/09/09/9-11-after-18-years/

___________________________________________________

23

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Preying Kosher Headmistress, Malka Leifer, protected by Israel - Inside insular Jewish community where headmistress Malka Leifer allegedly preyed on girls - *https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KqJAh5wvWEg Undercover in Israel in secret operation to expose alleged paedophile principal Malka Leifer –

*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izoBoQ-6zac Eva Herman, May 24, 2019: Blutgericht Europa - Karl der Große als Ursache des Untergangs von Deutschland und Europa:* https://www.amazon.de/Blutgericht-Eur... * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5OEUFs3uxo

***************************************************************************************

24