developing pbc in nhs nottinghamshire county the 2009 budget and the nhs chris ham, editorial 29...
DESCRIPTION
Developing PBC in NHS Nottinghamshire County The local picture is one of relatively good progress PBC cluster structure Strong and credible cluster leadership Dedicated resource at cluster level Fair shares resource allocation Tracker surveys show majority of GPs supportive of principles of the policy though this has not translated into active engagement More collaborative working relationships among GPs, opened up lines of communication between GPs and PCT, and GPs and hospital staff, GPs and community staff Risk of enthusiasm waning because of lack of tangible progress in terms of improved services for patientsTRANSCRIPT
Deve
lopi
ng P
BC in
NHS
Not
tingh
amsh
ire C
ount
y The 2009 budget and the NHS Chris Ham, Editorial 29 April 2009 Professor of Health Policy and Management and Policy and ManagementHSMC, University of Birmingham
Primary care represents a greater challenge because practice-based commissioning has not achieved the level of genuine engagement among general practitioners and others that is needed.
Weaknesses in commissioning are the biggest threat to efforts to improve NHS performance. Time is running short for these problems to be dealt with
The bottom line is that NHS organisations should be scare by the prospect of an era of austerity unlike anything experienced in recent history. Having overcome their fright, they should act decisively to engage doctors in the quest for changes that both save money and improve outcomes.
The NHS organisation that inherit the future will be those that focus their attention on the people who are responsible for spending most of the resources provided for health care and support them to make the necessary changes at the front line of care.
Chris Ham, Professor of Health Policy and Management Policy and Management, Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham
Deve
lopi
ng P
BC in
NHS
Not
tingh
amsh
ire C
ount
y Introduction: key pathway to system reform or policy cul-de-sac?
Voluntary scheme introduced in 2005, one of the cornerstones of government health policy reform
Aims ill defined: objectives wide ranging and non-specific:• To encourage clinical engagement in service redesign and development• To improve the quality of services for patients• To enable better use of resources
Widespread view that not yet lived up to expectations or delivered intended benefits:• Few PBC-led initiatives; most small scale, local pilots focussing on provision of hospital
services in community settings• Little impact in terms of better services for patients or more efficient use of resources• Little interest in wider commissioning activities• No evidence that PBC can be a mechanism for achieving widespread change
Fundamentally PBC is underpowered and the incentives are weak
Deve
lopi
ng P
BC in
NHS
Not
tingh
amsh
ire C
ount
y The local picture is one of relatively good progress
PBC cluster structure
Strong and credible cluster leadership
Dedicated resource at cluster level
Fair shares resource allocation
Tracker surveys show majority of GPs supportive of principles of the policy though this has not translated into active engagement
More collaborative working relationships among GPs, opened up lines of communication between GPs and PCT, and GPs and hospital staff, GPs and community staff
Risk of enthusiasm waning because of lack of tangible progress in terms of improved services for patients
Deve
lopi
ng P
BC in
NHS
Not
tingh
amsh
ire C
ount
y Key barriers to progress have been identified
Roles and responsibilities• Local flexibilities have led to tensions
between GPs and PCTs• No common vision for PBC at the local
levelCapacity and capability• Limitations on GPs time • Lack of some core skills • PCT inability to deliver the substantial
support requiredData• Lack of reliable timely data to develop
ideas or manage budgets
Relationships• Issues with communication, information,
prioritisation and trustGovernance and accountability• Financial and clinical risk• Few levers available to PCT to hold PBC to
accountConflicts of interest• Conflation of PBC with GP own provision
and risk of perception of subverting choice• PCT support of community servicesWider context• Poor quality relations between GPs and
government
Deve
lopi
ng P
BC in
NHS
Not
tingh
amsh
ire C
ount
y The future of practice based commissioning in NHS Nottinghamshire County
In its current form PBC clearly not operating effectively; progress has been slow and risks stalling completely
DH seeking to “reinvigorate and redefine” the policy
Not much detail but elements likely to include:• Multi-layered matrix model of successful PBC • Continuum of earned autonomy• High performers rewarded with increased independence• More freedom and stronger incentives to innovate
No central blueprint and PCTs will be able to establish their own PBC “escalator” arrangements
Any PBC escalator must support progress in World Class Commissioning
Deve
lopi
ng P
BC in
NHS
Not
tingh
amsh
ire C
ount
yThe PBC escalator is a formalised “give and get” compact between PBCs and the PCT.
The “give”: The “get” in return might be:
Contractual accountability for national/ local objectives
Greater delegated authority over budgets and ability to commit resource
Greater strategic contribution Greater autonomy over “operational” commissioning
Population health focus Dedicated and embedded managerial support
Cluster governance (including accountability to local population
Access to FESC
Duty of partnerships (especially with community services and social care)
Flexibilities on planning cycle/financial accounting period
Financial balance and risk sharing Flexibility around FURS (what is can be used for and 70/30 split)
Clinical quality (including access) Access to capital / joint (integrated care) venture opportunities
Access to PBC “innovation” fundsPBC Escalator: Greater autonomy and entitlements are traded for greater accountability, greater responsibility and achievement.
Deve
lopi
ng P
BC in
NHS
Not
tingh
amsh
ire C
ount
y(Baseline) Level One Level Two Level Three Level Four
Scope of PBC
Hospital contracts and budgetsMinimum take contractsNon NHS contractsPrescribingPBC & management costs
Community servicesPsychological therapiesPrimary care education and trainingStrategic initiative (SI) alignment at local levelVital signs (VS) alignment at local levelNSR alignment at local levelNew ( “enhanced”) primary care service contracts
GP contracts Mental healthAmbulance servicesSupport to PCT specialist commissioning processes
Non-GP independent contractorsJoint commissioning
Commissioningcompetencies
Use of cluster level PH outcome measures to drive service change and improvementBasic financial and analysis skillsProvide clinical engagementWork collectively with partners on commissioning, reform and redesignBasic governanceCommitment to CQI
Clinical leadershipDemonstrate competencies in re-design and implementationUse of data to manage demand and lever change in clinical behavioursUse of data to underpin PCT/ cluster VS and SIProgressive governance frameworkProgressing PPI and engagement strategy and decision makingManagement of conflicts of interest in procurementJoint work with social servicesCluster OD plan
Contractual accountabilityCluster Board developmentDetailed use of performance data Business development strategyPartnership workingRisk management and pooling arrangementsComprehensive PPI in decision making
Acting a principal system manager for local health and social care partnershipsCross locality budgetary management capabilities
PCT support
Implementation of fair sharesTimely and accurate clinical and financial dataIndicative budget covering agreed scope of servicesAgreed governance and accountability arrangements with practicesBusiness case approval <150K within two weeksManagement and staffing support from PCTQuarterly list size and demographic adjustment
Decision on 95% business cases <150 K within a month of submissionProvide monthly accurate , timely management information (cluster defined) Risk poolingDedicated staff and supportPBC integrated into WCC modelProgramme of OD to support cluster developmentPCT support when dealing with providers
Decision on 100% business cases < 250 K within a month of submissionDelivery of PCT strategy via locality model
Extensive programme of OD to develop system level skills and knowledgeProvision of staff support
PBC freedoms, incentives and powers
Baseline management allowanceBusiness case approval limit <100K100% savings retainedConsultation regarding PCT business planning
Enhanced management allowanceBusiness case approval limit <150KService agreement model to devolve and embed commissioning management supportPBC involvement in PCT business planningAdvice on management of capital Oversight over prioritisation and locality spend of out of scope services
Hard HCHS hard budgetBusiness case approval limit < 250K Management of capital
Hard full/combined HCHS/GMS budgetICO environmentPBC management of network of providers for locality
Deve
lopi
ng P
BC in
NHS
Not
tingh
amsh
ire C
ount
yThe PBC escalator is underpinned by the following core principles
• Clusters will start at the platform level (level 1), and only move through the levels when the requirements are achieved with regard to PBC competencies and PCT support, and signed-off by the PCT
• PBCs acquiring greater autonomy must be accompanied by an accountability framework for delivery of PCT targets, including budgetary control and the priorities of the Strategic Plan
• The scope of budgets delegated to the clusters will be negotiated jointly and will reflect their aspirations and competencies. They will be set fairly, transparently and in collaboration with the clusters
• Clusters will work with their practices to manage their resources within the delegated budgets• Risk sharing arrangements will be required between the PCT and the clusters• The concept of “influenceable spend” should underpin accountability and that whilst PBC clusters may hold
substantial indicative budgets they may wish to “block back” certain of the budgets and accountability to the PCT . The increased scope to manage budgets and influence will change over time
• Demand management initiatives will be taken forward by the PBC clusters and the PCT in partnership, particularly around budgets that are not directly “influenceable” by PBC
• That PBC has a role in overseeing the quality of primary care, areas of service redesign, bringing care closer to home and the associated primary care education programmes.
• That a comprehensive, timely and accurate financial and information report will be developed with clusters and practices
• Metrics will be developed reflecting national requirements with further discussion of “must do’s” and the contribution of PBC
• Training and other support will be available from the PCT to clusters in financial and other governance responsibilities
• An assurance programme will be required to ensure the PCT is in a position to assess requests to move up a level.
Deve
lopi
ng P
BC in
NHS
Not
tingh
amsh
ire C
ount
y“The trick that has to be accomplished is to harness the energies of clinicians and reformers in the quest for improvements in performance that benefit patients. Succeeding needs reformers to develop a better appreciation of the organisations they are striving to change, and clinicians to acknowledge that change is needed.”
Chris Ham