chesapeake fish passage prioritization project: overview

9
Chesapeake Fish Passage Prioritization Project: Overview MARY ANDREWS NOAA JULIE DEVERS USFWS ERIK MARTIN THE NATURE CONSERVANCY CHESAPEAKE BAY FISH PASSAGE WORK GROUP

Upload: tabib

Post on 23-Feb-2016

43 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Chesapeake Fish Passage Prioritization Project: Overview. Mary Andrews NOAA Julie Devers USFWS Erik Martin The Nature Conservancy Chesapeake Bay Fish Passage Work Group. Key Drivers. Agencies shift toward targeted restoration - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Chesapeake Fish Passage Prioritization Project: Overview

Chesapeake Fish Passage Prioritization Project:

Overview

M A RY A N D R E W SN O A A

J U L I E D E V E R SU S F W S

E R I K M A R T I NT H E N AT U R E C O N S E RVA N C Y

C H E S A P E A K E B AY F I S H PA SS A G E W O R K G R O U P

Page 2: Chesapeake Fish Passage Prioritization Project: Overview

AGENCIES SHIFT TOWARD TARGETED RESTORATION

• To target high priority dam removals and fish blockages based on our collective priorities

• To have a consistent voice (Federal, State, local and non-profits) when advocating for bay-wide priority dam removals/passage projects

• To justify additional fundingBEAN COUNTING

• To act as a database for dam information, mileage opened and spatial tool to highlight our progress

Key Drivers

Page 3: Chesapeake Fish Passage Prioritization Project: Overview

Chesapeake Bay Watershed: Anadromous Scenario

Uses 1:24k high-resolution National Hydrography Dataset 3,883 prioritized dams

Improved diadromous fish data

Ability to use tool for data management Calculating miles opened Map making

Ability to make changes to the prioritization Select other ways to

prioritize

Page 4: Chesapeake Fish Passage Prioritization Project: Overview

CFPPP Metrics

 Connectivity Status Number of dams downstream to river mouth Number of downstream fish passage facilities Connectivity Improvement Upstream functional network size.

Watershed and Local Condition Metric Percent Impervious Surface in ARA of Upstream Functional Network Percent Natural LC in ARA of Upstream Functional Network Percent forested land cover in ARA of functional network (brook trout scenario) Percent Impervious Surface in Contributing Watershed (potential)

Ecological Metrics Number of anadromous species present downstream American eel presence metric or American eel absence metric (exact metric TBD) Stream Health

Size Metric Number of upstream size classes >0.5 miles gained by removal Small streams that connect directly to marine / estuarine habitat

Page 5: Chesapeake Fish Passage Prioritization Project: Overview

Decision Support Tool

Web map application Shows the overall Chesapeake

Bay Fish Passage Prioritization – displays the consensus based ranking upfront

Query results and view in the context of other relevant data

Allow user to work at a different scale(subwatershed, state, etc)

Allow user to create custom weight scenarios

Page 6: Chesapeake Fish Passage Prioritization Project: Overview

Road Crossings

144,788 total road crossings in Chesapeake Bay drainage Vast majority of road

crossings > 139,000 fall along small rivers and streams (drainages < 100 km2)

Field observations still the most reliable way to determine fish barriers

In Chesapeake, most road crossing barriers will impact resident species

Still a major issue for fish passage in general

Page 7: Chesapeake Fish Passage Prioritization Project: Overview

Addressing Road Crossings in CBFPPP

Road and Railroad crossings are not “prioritized” in the current GIS tool 37 times more roads

crossings than dams Select priority

watershed based on dam ranking

Field assess road/railroad crossings in selected watershed

Page 8: Chesapeake Fish Passage Prioritization Project: Overview

North Fork Shenandoah River– Brook Trout

Page 9: Chesapeake Fish Passage Prioritization Project: Overview

Patapsco River – Anadromous Example