chapter - li - shodhgangashodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/61335/7/07_chapter 2.pdf ·...
TRANSCRIPT
CHAPTER - LI
2. 0. FOOD AND FEEDING HABITS
2.1. INTRODUCTION
Studies on food and feeding of animals are of great importance to
understand growth, migration, reproduction and seasonal variation in body
condition (Suresh Kumar, 1998). Information on natural diet of fish is a necessity
for understanding its nutrient requirements and to know the interactions with
other organisms (Royce, 1989). Moreover, observations on food and feeding
along with the species assemblages structure will help us to understand the
extent of competition for food among different populations. Basic knowledge on
the food preference and feeding of a species is of primary importance to
ascertain its suitability/ compatibility in aquaculture practice in culture systems
with minimum interspecies competition for the natural food (NBFGR - 2000).
11
The application of food and feeding habits of fishes is also one of the ways to
control the waterborne disease (Menon and Checko, 1958). It also provides vital
cues to develop supplementary feed for the species. The food and feeding habits
of some freshwater fishes were studied by Mookrjee (1945, 1944); Kamal (1964);
Das and Moitra, (1963, 1955, 1956, 1958); Bhatnagar and karamenaani, (1970);
Vinci and Suganam (1981); Chacko and Kuriyan (1949); Kurup, (1993);
Annamercy et al., (2001); Mookerjee and Mazumder, (1946); Alikuni, 1956;
Nataraj, 1972; Natarajan and Jhingran (1961); Quasim (1964); Rajan (1965);
Pandian (1966); Singha (1972); David and Rajagopal (1975); Pathak (1975);
Badola and Singh (1980); and Sharma et al., (1988). Even though from early 1980s
onwards scientific community had give much attention in this line, except for
the studies on the biology of some threatened fishes such as the hill stream bach
N. triangularis (Rita kumari and Balakrishanan nair, 1979). Tor putitora (Nautiyial
and Lal, 1982), Labeo dussumieri (Kurup, 1990) more works are needed in these
aspects. An analysis of the food and feeding habits also play an important role in
conservation and management of genetic resources. (Nagi and Tajima, 2002;
Manoj kumar and Madhusoodana Kurup (2002a); Eupherasia and
Madhusoodana Kurup (2002); Bala Krishna and Madhusoodana Kurup (2003);
Manoj kumar and Madhusoodana Kurup (2002b). Geetha et al., (1990) recorded
that Puntius vittatus adopted their life in relation to environmental along with
the food-feeding habitat; Kurup (1993) studied food and feeding habits of
spawn, fry, fingerlings and juveniles of P.vittatus. Mercy et
12
al., (2002) described the food and feeding habits of Punt-ius melanampyx an
endemic ornamental fish of Western Ghats. Basutha and Wisvanath, (1999)
investigated the food composition of various size groups of Otnpok belegari an
endemic carp of Manipur and explained the anatomical feature of the
alimentary canal compatible to the food and feeding habits of the fish.
Regarding food and feeding habits of M.gulio only a limited number of studies
was made by Yusuf and Pulak kumar Majumdar (1993), David (1963), Pandian
(1972). The present study has been attempted to report complete details of food
and feeding habits of M. gulio.
2. 2. Material and Methods
2. 2.0. Description of Test Fish
2.2.1. Systematic positionPhylum: ChordataSub phylum: VertebrataGrade: PiscesSuper class: GnathostomataClass: ActinopterygiiSub class: NeopterygiiDivision: TelosteiOrder: SiluriformsFamily: BagridaeSub family: BagrinaeGenus: MystusSpecies: gulio
Mystus gulio is a semi- aggressive freshwater catfish. In Tamil Nadu it would be
called as "Mangaluru"(p( 1e 2.1)
13
Distribution in Asia: Countries bordering the eastern Indian ocean, from India to
Indonesia and Vietnam; reported from Pakistan (Taiwar and Jhingran 1991).
Primarily it prefers brackish water but in freshwater also it occurs mainly in larger
water bodies (river and streams) with mud or clay substratum rarely found in
smaller streams, forms schools of 10 to 25 individuals (Pethiyangoda, 1991).
2. 2. 2. Description of Study Area
River Tambraparani (Map-2.1) originates from Agsthyamalai on the
eastern slopes of Southern Western Ghats at an altitude of 2000m and runs
through Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu. Sand carried by the river is copper colored,
hence the name Tambaraparani which in Tamil means "bearer of copper" (Rama
devi et al., 1997). Several tributaries like Servalar, Manimuthar, Gadananadhi,
Pachiyar and Chittar join the main river Tambaraparani from a compact drainage
basin. Earlier work on the upper reaches of Tambaraparani River was contributed
by Silas (1953), Johsingh and Vickram (1987) and Rama Devi (1992a, 1992b).
2. 2. 3. Fish Collection
Monthly fifty samples of M. gulio were collected from Tambaraparani river
basin. The specimens were preserved immediately in 5% formalin and brought
back to the laboratory (Centre for Aquaculture Research and Extension, (CARE)),
St. Xavier's college, and Palayamkottai. Length and weight were measured and
the intensity of the feeding was noted based on the state of the distension of the
gut. The point's method as described by Hynes (1980) and Pillay (1952) was
adopted for the gut content analysis. The amount of food contained i.e., as empty14
(when the gut is almost empty), poor (when the gut contained little amount of
food), moderate (when the gut was half full), good (when the guts was almost
full and gorged). The gut contents were identified up to the species level as far as
possible. Depending on the intensity of the feeding and gut fullness, points were
given to the stomach as 20, 15,10,5 and 0 for full, good, moderate, poor and
empty conditions. The percentage occurrence of different food items was
determined by summing up the total occurrence of all items from which the
percentage occurrence of each food item was calculated (Hynes, 1950). The index
of preponderance was worked out based on Natarajan and Jhingran (1962). The
morphological assessment of food and feeding habits was carried out by
observing the mouth- position, mouth- gap, lips, jaws, teeth, gill rackers,
stomach, vent, intestine etc, in detail for categorizing the fish as one among the
three groups Viz; herbivorous, carnivorous, and omnivorous. The Relative
Length of Gut (RLG) was worked out following the method described by Al -
Hussain (1949) as
Length of the gut (cm)
RLG =
Total length of the body (cm)
2. 3. Results
2. 3. 1. Alimentary Canal and Feeding Habits Morphology
The alimentary canal of M.gulio consists (Fig- 2.1) of buccopharnx,
oesophagous, stomach, intestine and rectum. The rectum however is not
15
ANUS ANUS
MOUTH
INTESTINEINTESTINE
DORSAL VIE
LVIEW
OESOPHAGU
STOMACH
OESOPHAGUS
STOMACH
FIG.2.1. ALIMENTARY CANAL OF Mystus gullo
distinguishable from out side. The mouth is sub terminal and inferior in
position. The buccal cavities are provided with various minute teeth. The
esophagus is a thick walled tube connecting the buccopharnx with the
stomach. The stomach has the appearance of a 'U' shaped bag having a
cardiac and a pyloric part. Almost the stomach remains covered with the
bilobbed liver. Following the stomach is the intestine, which is wide at the
anterior end and after forming a coil, joins with the rectum. The posterior
end of intestine and the rectal region have almost same diameter. The gut is
short with RLG ranging between 0.64 and 0.73 (AV, 0.67). Morphmetric
assessments of feeding habits of M.gulio are given in Table - 2.1. Most of the
characters of the test fish indicate its omnivorous feeding habits. The special
characteristics such as moderately built jaws, less and moderately long gill
rackers and moderately long and few coils in intestine conforms that M. gulio
is an omnivorous fish.
2. 3. 2. Food compositions
The gut content of M. gulio was found to contain 11 food items
(Table - 2.2). Fish (Puntius spp, Macropodus cupanus), insects larvae (dragonfly,
damselfly, water scorpion and chironomus), crustacean (broken shells of prawns,
naupli, and mysis larvae) were the main food composition of M.gulio . Other
items of algae, copepodes, rotifers, cladocerans, crustaceans, unknown matters
and degraded matters were also recorded. Decayed and unknown matters were
found to be a major portion in all monthly samples.16
I—
o 0000 0 00Z*r n ir
'( CO 00 C\ '.0 (N — '.0 '.0Cfl
ZO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
l( '( 'e *r a,
a 00 (N 0 '.0 '.0 '.0 '0 '0 0 '.0 00(N --
o. 'o o m CO 00 0 00 InZ (N ICq (N (N (N (N N Cl) N
0 0000000 0 00Z In In In In In in In In In In In
N e 'o 00 (N '0 '.0 00 0 00 N 0 08 en e. N (N In--
en — In en ON Inl) Z N N (N. N (N — - (N - — (N
0 0000000 0 00Z in In In In In In In in In In In
(N 00'.0(Nen'.0 — CONa '.0 •- '.0 en 0'. ir '.0 enen '.0 In en — '.0 en In '.0
00 '.0 N lql N 00ON
0 0000000 0 00Z in in 'n 'n in In in in in in in
(N o 0 '0 00 '.0 0 NO v 0 N8 '0 en '.0 1(5 W')(N ---
0 en N l 00 In en E- - In '0i- Z en N N (N — N en (N N en N
0 0000000 0 00z In In In 'fl In In In in
a (N 10 '0 0 0 0 00 N '.0 008 en In en enNO In en N(N --
'.0 00 r- oo In 0 0 Cs '.0 00 'len — N — — N en (N — en —
J
R HHJnIUHI
I
0U
0 C> 00 0000 0 Q 4
', lr n •i II) 'r i1 *()e N 't 0 0 0 00 N 00 '0
o 0 0 '0 N '--
- N 0 *fl —11, cq_ en en en N N N N N N - N0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
z ', I) *flê © 0 00 N N 0 ¼. ¼Ø 10 N
t- 00 '.fl IT IV en en N en1
1 1.0 — 0 N 00 00 en '.0Z en N N N N N N — — — —0 000 0000 0 00
Z kn 4n u1 '( 'r 't 'i 'r ,fNO '.0 00 '0 0 00 N N 00 00 0N o'. '.0 ' '.0 en II en en en
en 00 en 0 O '.0 '.0 as 'tZ en N N N en — N — N .— —
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0en
Z v 'r *e r
a 1q, '.0 00 1.0 N 0 00 '. '.. 0
kn In in en '.0 inN
N 00 aN 00 110 0 qtr r-. en 00 0Z en N N N N N N — en N N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
Z ir 'nkn In n in in in in v in
a N N 00 00 '.0 N — N N N
'.0 '.0 in Vi in v in 'n enN10 N —
1 C7 100 10 — '.0 1.0 '.0Zen enenen NNNN N N-
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Z in in In i1 in * in in in in in
N a 000 '.0 '.0 '.0 N N N 00
00 '. r- - in '.0 '.0 in 00 inNci 0 N in cl, ON en en 10 — '.0
Z en en en N en en N v N N
ri)
.2 oinCJ rA
45= • =PC z — 7 —o
14A, cd ccco co p
These observations indicated that fish exhibited bottom dwelling habit. The
percentage of each category of food items were described as follows.
2. 3. 2. 1. Algae
Green algae belonging to the family of Chiorophycea,
Spirogyra, Ulothorax, Odogonium and Zygonema were found abundantly in the
food. The percentage of occurrence was found to be 36%-80%.
2.3.2.2. Zooplankton
Zooplankton such as copepods (39%-76%), rotifers (40%-76%) and
cladocera (30%-64%) were observed.
2. 2. 3. Insect Larvae
Some insect's larvae and nymphs (Naiads) Viz., dragonfly, damselfly, water
scorpion, chironomus larvae (36%-78%) were observed.
2. 3. 2. 4. Crustacean
Mainly crustacean appendages, broken shells, and prawn nauplius, mysis and
lucifers (19.2%-68%) and molluscan shells and muscles, which constituted 20%-
66%.
2. 3. 2. 5. Detritus
Decayed forms of vegetative matters were observed as greenish
mass with unshaped appearance.
17
2. 3. 2. 6. Annelid worms
Mainly constituted by earthworms and some unknown items of annelids (22%-
74%) observed.
2. 3. 2. 7. Fish and Fish scales
Puntius species, and fish scales were present at 20%-76% and 8%-70%
respectively.
2.3.2.8. Unknown items
Most of the miscellaneous matters like twigs, shell matter, seeds
and plant matter, semi- digested animal tissues (28%-69.2%) were mainly
present.
2.4. Seasonal variation of food items
The monthly variation of food items was analyzed based on index of
preponderance value for the year June 02 to May 03 (Table - 2.3). Insects are
regular food items throughout the experimental period with the maximum index in
October (16.00) and minimum was found in May (8.26). Next level of preference
was molluscan form; it appeared maximum in July (23.10) and minimum in
February (5.21). Third level of abundance was copepods which recorded a
maximum in September (18.32) and minimum in June (11.05) than the rotifers
during the entire period (Max: January 6.32, Min: June 0.45). Fourth level of
abundance was recorded for algae (Max: October 16.00, Min: May 8.26), and small
fishes which found max in February (20.12) and minimum in August (0.10).
18
',o c0000
o6l r-4 ce) " 00 r-4 N o6 r-4Lfl
Q 000 NO 00 C'l
Cf) 00o
LO D 0000 4 00 r
Oo
0 0LI) .'i . OrC4
LO r-4 r 00 LO "0 N.
0 C'lQ0 C'4 00 00 CI) r
0
LI) l .I LI) 0' 4 LI) N. C'1 r4 14
0 4C'19 000 4
0— LI)
0
LO 4 r4 LO 4 CI) 00 N. -4 r4 00-
O ?-4e1'o
1-"O"0
0c Lr) r-i l4 ' CI) ('.1 4 '.0 co C"l •'1
000r-l0e40
el U) ' r-4 ,-4 CI) CI) CI) ri N. C'4- c! - -
CqCI)0 • 00 0\0o6 Ci0
U) ti LO 00 U) CI) l -4 N. - ©
C4 4 IN
'.b¼b 0'
0 o60000
0
U) 1-4 r.4 4 C1 00 C'1 00 4
LO
'a-' LO
in in0 LO0 4 C'4 0 • Cr-4 4 0 CI) 00 C'1 00 4 0 CI)
0
___
0
0
0
tys
IC)
Annelid worm (Max: April (8.00), Mm: August (2.34) had high value of average
when compared to the cladocerans. Finally, detritus matter and unknown matters
were recorded throughout the year.
2.5. Feeding Intensity
Feeding intensity of M. gulio data were depicted in the form of Fig -
2.1. Occurrence of full gut was seen during January (78%) and 3/4 gut was observed
in July (32%) whereas the presence of ½ gut was seen in April (48%). Dominance of
1/4 guts was recorded in August (26%) and no ¼ gut was found in December,
January and February. Guts with no food were encountered during September
(40%). The intensity of feeding index (Table-2.4) was more in January to February
(90.5%-91.5%). Very low feeding index was recorded during the September and
August (40% and 44% respectively).
2. 6. Discussion
The adaptation of the alimentary canal of fishes to their food is particularly evidenced
in the form of mouth, size, shape and structure of the orophamx, dentition, gill
rackers, structure of the esophagus, and shape of stomach and relative length of the
gut. The alimentary canal shows variation and modifications in accordance with the
feeding habits of different fishes. The mouth positions were determined by the
feeding habit of particular fish. The sub terminal mouth noticed in M. gulio was well
adopted for column feeding habit (Gupta et al., 1999). Carnivorous fishes have strong
teeth, jaws and long gill rackers in contrast herbivores are characterized by absence of
19
Fig 2.1 Percentage of food items of M. gulio Present in different months
Jun July Aug Sep oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May
Months
+
1000/900/800/
0 7ñ01I _I /1
60°/a
40°Ao
20 0/,
100/1
0°A
•empty gut..1I4 gut
- 1/2 gut•3/4 gut
hI gut
0
0
0
cu—4
fu
.. ,-.
LI)
00
LO
co It, anlin 10 CD
004C'),400U) •OZ oil.
(100cc
CDOQrIQQ00LI) f)
4 ('4 t' U) (N all. (N U) 0 0
to 0
to 0
00
('4O
00
U)
U) GO in 00
pi A C]"" Lo Vl o" 'Zink 5? Rin d al l , 00 101
pm hh
teeth (Shafi, 2000). Adults of M. gulio possess moderately strong, jaws, gills with less
and moderately long and sub terminal mouth which distinguish the omnivorous
mode of feeding habits.
Coiling of intestine is a prominent index to distinguish the feeding habit of fishes
(coiled condition - herbivores; straight condition - carnivores). According to Khanna
(1961) gut of predatory or carnivorous fish has short intestine, in contrast to
omnivores and herbivores, which have long coiled intestine. Straight type of intestine
was seen in M.gulio which indicating carnivorous type of feeding. Another important
factor is relative length of gut (RLG) to determine feeding habits of fishes (Sharma
(1986); Datta Dasgupta (1986); Bose and Islam (1986); De and Dasgupta (1995, 1997)
and North (1996). RLG value of M. gulio was found as 0.67. Some carnivorous fishes
like Channa spp, (Das & Moitra 1956; Das gupta, 2000) and herbivorous fishes like
Labeo rohita and L. genius, the RLG were about 12.0 and 9.5 respectively (Das and
Moitra 1995). In omnivorous fishes, (Das & Nath, 1965) RLG values were lower e.g.
Pun tias conchonius (3.3) and Barbus hexastichus (2.3); the carnivorous fishes (Bagariouis
bagarious and Notopterous chittala) were found to have RLG 0.8 and 0.4 respectively.
No doubt, RLG value of M. gulio indicated carnivorous type of feeding (Das and
Moitra, 1965). David (1963) and Yusuf, and Majumdar (1993) reported M. gulio from
open water of Kulti and Matlah estuaries and indicated the fish as omnivorous. In the
present study, M. gulio RLG was between herbivorous and carnivorous values
supporting omnivorous type of feeding. Nikolsky (1963) classified the food into four
different categories according to important of food items present in the diet of fish.
1) Basic food (normally eaten by fish and comprises most of the gut contents), 2)
Secondary food (frequently found in the gut), 3) Incidental food (rarely found), 4)
obligatory food (absence of basic food items). In accordance with above categories, M.
gulio comes under basic food level, because in most of the months the gut was filled
insects, molluscs, and copepods.
Considerably the seasonal variation of feeding percentage M. gulio indicated
identical feeding habitation i.e., consuming more or less same type of food items. Vast
proportion of food items consisted insects, copepods, small fish and algae, which
indicated the selection of euryphagic (feeding on variety of food) nature of feeding
habits. It appeared that among the same food groups, if any one of the food decreased,
another food item of the same group componsated it. This feeding habit indicates that
the fish lives in the same habitat environment without any competition or without
scarcity of food.
Feeding intensity of M. gulio was found to be higher during January and
February. Feeding intensity was very much influenced by maturity of gonads,
spawning and the availability of food items (Khan et al., 1998; Kashava et al., 1988;
Geetha et al., 1990; Pandian and Rahman, 1999; Rao et al., 1998). In the present study
during spawning season (Aug-Sep) percentage of empty gut was more Kader et al.,
(1988) reported their empty stomach in gravid females indicating starvation. This
cessation of feeding by gravid females may be attributed to the occupation of the
coelomic cavity by the fully matured swollen ovary cells. In the case of males, they do
not undergo fasting due to narrow testis. Khan (1988) reported that freshwater carp
21
Cyprinus macrostomus undergoes starvation or empty guts are found during the
breeding season. Generally feeding intensity was found to be very low during pre -
spawning and spawning seasons while it was high during post - spawning and at
maturity time of gonads because at that time more energy is needed for development
of the gonads. Pandian, (1966) reported intensive feeding to yield energy for metabolic
process of the fishes. Highest feeding intensity was recorded in January and February
which represented the gonad maturing time (Chapter - IV) .which requires vigorous
feeding to ensure vitellogenesis for the next breeding season. Lower feeding intensity
found during Auguest - September indicated the spawning season of M. gulio
(Chapter - III). Geevarghese (1976, 1984) observed similar phenomenon in Glassayobius
giuris and Ologolepis actipennis. Lagler et al., (1982) has suggested that feeding intensity
was limited by light, temperature, pH, salinity and internal rhythm that may exist. The
present study on food and feeding habits of M. gulio revealed that it is a column feeder
and basic food feeder with euryphagic mode of feeding.
22