CEEN 590 Sustainable Energy as a Social and Political Challenge

1

Today’s agenda Engineers point to

socio-political reasons

Why challenge is so formidable (Victor)

Carbon lock-in science-policy

dilemma Mooney (2)

2

Gregory C. Unruh, “Understanding carbon lock-in,” Energy Policy 28 (2000) 817-830.

Delucchi, M.A. and Jacobson, M.Z., “Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, Part II: Reliability, system and transportation costs, and policies,” Energy Policy 39 (2011) 1170–119. Read sections 4 and 5 only.

Chris Mooney, “The Science of Why We Don't Believe Science,” Mother Jones, May/June 2011,

Chris Mooney, "Do Scientists Understand the Public?" American Academy of Arts and Sciences, June 2010.

David G. Victor, Global Warming Gridlock, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), Chapter 2, “Why global warming is such a hard problem to solve.” (on-line UBC Library 3

1. Delucchi, M.A. and Jacobson, M.Z., “Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, Part II: Reliability, system and transportation costs, and policies,” Energy Policy 39 (2011) 1170–119. Read sections 4 and 5 only.

2. David G. Victor, Global Warming Gridlock, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), Chapter 2, “Why global warming is such a hard problem to solve.” (on-line UBC Library

3. Gregory C. Unruh, “Understanding carbon lock-in,” Energy Policy 28 (2000) 817-830.

4. Chris Mooney, “The Science of Why We Don't Believe Science,” Mother Jones, May/June 2011,

5. Chris Mooney, "Do Scientists Understand the Public?" American Academy of Arts and Sciences, June 2010. 4

5

A vision of clean energy system“We suggest producing all new energy

with [water, wind, and solar] by 2030 and replacing the pre-existing energy by 2050. Barriers to the plan are primarily social and political, not technological or economic. The energy cost in a WWS world should be similar to that today”

Jacobson, M.Z., Delucchi, M.A., Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, Part I: Technologies, energy resources, quantities and areas of infrastructure, and materials. Energy Policy (2010),

Victor’s 3 central political challenges

1. Very deep cuts to GHG emissions are required

Long residence time of CO2 in atmosphere – given rate of emissions stock is hard to reverse

2. Costs immediate, benefits uncertain and distant in time

“time inconsistency problem”3. Global nature of problem creates

spatial inconsistency: local costs, global benefits 6

7

Hoberg’s version: Why climate action is so hard politically

Cost of Mitigation Benefits of Mitigation

Relatively certain Highly uncertainNow Distant in Time

Here Global

Victor’s 3 myths about policy processScientist’s myth: scientific research

can determine the safe level of global warming

Environmentalist’s myth: global warming is a typical environmental problem

Engineer’s myth: once cheaper new technologies are available, they will be adopted

8

Path Dependence

9

February 2, 2011 Sustainable Energy Policy 10

February 2, 2011 Sustainable Energy Policy 11

Evolution of technical systems Increasing returns result from

Scale economies Learning economies Adaptive expectations Network economies

February 2, 2011 Sustainable Energy Policy 12

Techno-institutional complexNot discrete technological artifactsComplex system of technologies

embedded in a powerful conditioning social context of public and private institutions

Technological systems – technological lock-in

Institutional lock-in Private organizations governmentalFebruary 2, 2011 Sustainable Energy Policy 13

February 2, 2011 Sustainable Energy Policy 14

February 2, 2011 Sustainable Energy Policy 15

Obama State of Union

February 2, 2011 Sustainable Energy Policy 16

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZdEmjtF6HE at 12:00 – 17:00

Trying to overcome lockin by 2035, 80% of America's electricity will come from

clean energy sources. Some folks want wind and solar. Others want nuclear, clean coal, and natural gas. To meet this goal, we will need them all - and I urge Democrats and Republicans to work together to make it happen

We need to get behind this innovation. And to help pay for it, I'm asking Congress to eliminate the billions in taxpayer dollars we currently give to oil companies. I don't know if you've noticed, but they're doing just fine on their own. So instead of subsidizing yesterday's energy, let's invest in tomorrow's.

February 2, 2011 Sustainable Energy Policy 17

Science and Politics

18

Mooney

Deficit Model: “You just don’t understand” more information will resolve conflicts

and produce appropriate policy responseMembers of the public strain their

responses to science controversies through their value systems

Social science helps explain how this works

19

Motivated reasoning (Mooney) motivated cognition: unconscious tendency to fit

processing of information to conclusions that suit some end or goal biased information search: seeking out (or

disproportionally attending to) evidence that is congruent rather than incongruent with the motivating goal

biased assimilation: crediting and discrediting evidence selectively in patterns that promote rather than frustrate the goal

identity-protective cognition: reacting dismissively to information the acceptance of which would experience dissonance or anxiety. 

Daniel Kahan, “What Is Motivated Reasoning and How Does It Work?, Science and Religion Today May 4, 2011.

20

21

The politics of science: Classic view: separation

Science(facts)

Politics(values)

Truth

22

Politics of Science:Recognition of “Trans-science”

Jasanoff and Wynne 1998

23

Politics of ScienceConstructivist View

Politics

Science

24

Politics of ScienceConstructivist View (when pressed)

Politics

Science

25

Politics and Science Policy reflects value judgments, but

embodies causal assumptions Causal knowledge frequently very uncertain,

undermining power of science actors adopt the scientific arguments most

consistent with their interests “science” becomes a contested resource for

actors in the policy process, by lending credibility to arguments

the body of credible science bounds the range of legitimate arguments, but only loosely

26

Politics and Science (cont)

Scientific controversies are frequently more about underlying value conflicts e.g., conservation vs. development

27

A continuum

Science Politics

Regulatory Science

Regulatory Science: Scientific assumptions adopted for the purpose of policy-making

28

Regulatory Science Approach Some causal assumptions are better than others

– science helps Some policies are better reflections of society’s

distribution of preferences than others -- democratic institutions help

Avoid: political decisions made by scientists and scientific judgments being made by politicians

Prefer: transparent justification for decisions Reveals boundary where scientific advice ends and

value judgments begins Promotes accountability

Next week

Formal governance

29