case study on talent attrition
TRANSCRIPT
Context&Background.TheclientorganizationisareasonablylargemanufacturingorganizationwithaturnoverofapproximatelyRs2,500crores.With4SBUs,9manufacturingUnitsacrossthecountryand3jointventures,themanagementstructurewasacomplexandclassicalSBUstructure.TheSBUstructurewasadoptedtofacilitategrowthandtomovetherevenueCAGRfromthetraditional12-13%toamoreaggressive22-24%.
ThereweremanytransitionsquietlytakingplacewithintheGroupalongwiththeintroductionoftheSBUstructure.Newleadership.Shiftfrombeingadeliverybasedproductionshoptoamoresustainableandprofessional/processbasedwaysofrunningthebusiness.RolebasedstructuresandKRAbasedaccountability.
HRwasaclassicalhubandspokemodelacceptforthefactthatthespokeswerebrokenandthestronghubhadnohandsandlegsandtendedtodriftduringimplementation.ThegeneralmanagerialroleoftheSBUHeadsandplantheadswasstillsettlinginandinsomeareasthereweresharpcapabilitygaps
ProblemStatement.Overtheyears,peoplemanagementpracticeshadnotkeptpaceandamongotherthingsthisshowedupinrisingattritionofstaff.Theproblemexistedearlierbutitwasnotnoticed,notmeasuredinaconsistentwayandnevercameontheradaroftheseniorleadership.Byandlargeitwastakenasthecostofdoingbusinessinthisindustry.In2017TalentonicHRSolutionwasinvitedtostudythe
phenomenonofattrition,createanactionplanandassistintheimplementation.TalentonicestablishedaconsistentmethodologyacrosstheGroupandastandard,internationallyacceptedwayofcalculatingattrition.
Fortheyear2017-18theattritioncametoawhopping29%.25%voluntaryand4%involuntary.Onelevelofproblemwashowhightheattritionwas,anditsdamagetothebusiness.Thebiggerlevelofproblemwasnobodyknewhowhighitwas,whatwascausingit,whatwastheindustrypracticeandwhattodotobringitdown.Thestandardwayofdealingwithitwasto
pretendthattherewasnoproblemandtocriticizeHRfornotrecruitingreplacementsfastenough!Badqualityofrecruitment.Badattitude.Competitionhiring.Compensationproblems.Alltheusualexcusestoavoidowningup.Firststepwastodoadeepdiveintotheissuetoidentifythebigthemes,whichneededtobetackled.
TheBigThemes&Causes1. Completelackofaccountability.ItwasonnoonesKRA.Itwasnotontheagendaoftheexecutivecouncil.Noone.Literallynooneintheorganizationwastaskedtodealwiththisissue.
2. Highinfantmortality.36%oftheemployeesjoiningthefirmwerelikelytoleavewithin6months.
3. ThehighestattritionlevelswereinHR–58%.Thefiremenwhoweresupposedtofightthefirewerethemselvesrunningaway.
4. 84%ofthetotalattritioncamefromthebottomtwolevels.Therewasdefinitelyaweaknessinthepeoplemanagementcapabilityofmidmanagement.
5. Withinthebusinessunits&factorylocationstherewasreallynoanalysisanddiscussionofpeopleissues.AttritionwasdiscussedonlyatCorporate.Engagementwasignored.
TheSolutions1. Establishsharpaccountabilities.MonthlyMISbythe6thofeverymonth.Targetof12%attritionestablishedfortwoyears.AttritionKRAwith20%weightage.TrackingofattritionatthelevelofindividualleadersuptoN-2level.
2. PeopleConnectsubstantiallyimproved.Pre-joiningplanning.Buddyscheme.Skipmeetings.One-onOnes.
3. Firsttimeleadershipdevelopment.Signatureprogramlaunchedwithmultipleshortmodules.Projectworkandperiodicdiscussionstoreinforcethemodule.Leadershipreview.
4. PeoplecommitteeconstitutedineverybusinessunittobechairedbySBUHeadtodiscussallexitsbynameandtheprogressofallinitiatives.
5. Anintegratedactionplancreatedwithattritionandemployeeengagementtocreateasingleplatformfordealingwithpeopleissues.
6. Targetedimprovementinemployeerelatedinfrastructureattheplants.Latesitting.Travelapprovals.Transport.Canteen.Security.
BusinessBenefit.1. Attritiondroppedfrom29%in17-18to18%inQ1of18-19.Marchingtowards12%target.
2. Attritionofthebottom2levelsdroppedby8%3. Expectednumberofexecutivesleavinginfirst6monthsdroppedto12intheyear18-19downfrom46in17-18!
4. AcadreoftrainedfrontlineleadersemergedwhohavebeentrainedonJohnAdair’sactionLeadershipmodel.
Learning1. TheactionisatthelocationsandnotattheCorporateOffice.ToomuchtimespentatCorporateOfficediscussingstrategyandreviewingprogress.Youhavetobeatthelocationswheretheemployeeinteractionishappeningandtheopportunitycreatedforretention.
2. Deepdiagnosticishalfthebattlewon.Attritioncannotbetackledatagrosslevel.Bothforengagementaswellasforattrition,actionisatmultiplelevels.Insomecasespolicyneedstobefixed,andatsomeotherlevelsthereisanissueofimplementation,skill,localaction,leadershipstylethatneedstobefixed.
3. Decisiontoleaveisinfluencedbychallengeswithintheorganization.Theopportunityoutsideisaverysmallpartofthestory,andinanycaseisnotwithinyourcontroltoinfluenceorchange.
4. Involvementofemployeesanddialogueismoreimportantthanpolicy.Spendtimewithsmallgroups.Listentowhattheysayandseektheirsupport.
5. Cannotdivorceattritioncontrolfromleadershipdevelopmentatthemidmanagementlevel.Thereareinvariablyskillgapsatthatlevelindealingwithemployeeissues.
TalentonicHRSolutionsSuiteNo1007,10thFloor,ParkCentra.Sector30