b2b group2 section b

Upload: aman-mahindroo

Post on 09-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/8/2019 B2B Group2 Section B

    1/15

    Knowledge Management &Building Relationships in B2BNetworkToyota Case

    Project Report - Business to

    Business

    Group 2, Section B

    Debanik Basu

    Gaurav Gupta

    Julie Pages

    Nitin Gupta

    Santosh Matala

  • 8/8/2019 B2B Group2 Section B

    2/15

  • 8/8/2019 B2B Group2 Section B

    3/15

  • 8/8/2019 B2B Group2 Section B

    4/15

    Toyotas Value chain (source : 100ventures.com)

    In the Kaizen strategy which is followed by the company, it tries to

    empower employee through mechanisms such as the system and qualitycontrol (QC) circles. Toyota's management philosophy has been reflected

    in the terms like "Lean Manufacturing" and "Just In Time", which has

    been adopted world over.

    Overcoming the knowledge Sharing Dilemmas: Toyota

    Way

    There is a big challenge to any value chain for an auto maker. Challenge

    for the company lies in knowledge sharing with suppliers and other

    players in the value chain. But it has been seen that knowledge diffusion

    occurring at Toyota Motors has been much more successful than its

    competing auto makers. Toyotas has been able to effectively create and

    manage network-level knowledge-sharing processes at least partially

    explains the relative productivity advantages enjoyed by Toyota and its

  • 8/8/2019 B2B Group2 Section B

    5/15

    suppliers. The evidence is there that suppliers do learn more quickly

    after participating in Toyotas knowledge-sharing network.

    Lets analyse how Toyota managed its knowledge sharing dilemmas.

    Encouraging Suppliers

    Toyota encouraged suppliers to openly participate in sharing knowledge,

    as it believed collective learning is superior. And to encourage suppliers

    to participate and openly share knowledge, Toyota has heavily

    subsidized the network (with knowledge and resources) during the early

    stages of formation to ensure that suppliers realize substantial benefits

    from participation. Suppliers are motivated to participate because theyquickly learn that participating in the collective learning processes is

    vastly superior to trying to isolate their proprietary knowledge. Toyota

    has also introduced a number of network-level knowledge sharing

    processes that have, over time, helped create a strong identity for the

    network.

    Addressing free-rider problems

    Network rules were setup so that suppliers can access knowledge once

    they agree to share their knowledge. In such network rules, company

    also included severe consequences for violating the rules, so to reduce

    such violations and bring in more discipline. Finally, to ensure that the

    network is efficient at tacit knowledge transfers, Toyota has created a

    highly interconnected, strong tie network with a variety of processes that

    facilitate knowledge transfers. The network has multiple pathways

    among members (effectively eliminating most structural holes). Toyotas

    strong tie network is well suited for the diffusion (exploitation) of

    Toyotas production know-how (e.g., the Toyota production system) as

    well as the existing know-how that resides within its suppliers.

  • 8/8/2019 B2B Group2 Section B

    6/15

    Creation of network identity

    Toyota realized that if a network can create a shared identity among

    members, then that shared identity can lower the costs of sharing

    knowledge within the network. Also, the diversity of knowledge that

    resides within a network is much greater than that which resides in a

    single firm. Company realized that if the network can get its members to

    cooperate in a social community it will create learning opportunities far

    superior to firms that do not reside within such a network. Toyotas

    network is effective at knowledge sharing, in part, because a strong

    network identity has emerged and the network has established rules

    (network norms) that support coordination, communication, and learning.

    In Japan, Toyotas network is known as the Toyota Group and Toyota

    openly promotes a philosophy within the Toyota Group called

    coexistence and co prosperity (Kyoson kyoei in Japanese). Toyota has

    also promoted this philosophy as a core value held by Toyota in a

    manual (called Selling to Toyota) that they created to help U.S.

    suppliers learn how to best work with Toyota.

    Kyohokai / Suppliers Association

  • 8/8/2019 B2B Group2 Section B

    7/15

    Philosophy and Belief - Toyota promotes philosophy in network

    coexistence and co-prosperity (Kyoson kyoei in Japanese) US context.

    Quality Cars require Quality Suppliers.

    Kyohokai Kyohokai is the suppliers region. It was first established

    in 1943 to promote mutual friendship and exchange of technical

    information. Later it was extended to Mutual development and training

    among its members. Kyohokai is divided into 3 regional associations

    based on geographical proximity. This association conducts general

    meetings every month Sharing explicit knowledge on topics (cost,

    quality, safety etc).

    Quality Committee - Number of initiatives are taken to increase the

    amount of knowledge in the network to promote product quality. Regular

    Committee is set up, which picks up a theme (based on Suppliers inputs)

    for the year. These committees then meet six times and and discussions

    are based on the theme.

    Apart from the above points, more programs are held to enhance the

    transfer of both explicit and implicit knowledge. Basic quality Trainingprograms are held for suppliers. These also include excellent plant tours.

    Annual quality management conference are also held which includes

    lectures and case discussions- 2 plant managers cases, 2 supervisors

    cases, and 2 quality circles cases.

    Toyotas replicated kyohokai in the USA in 1989 - Setup Bluegrass

    Automotive Manufacturers Association (BAMA)

    Consulting Teams / Problem Solving Teams

    Toyota established its Operations Management Consulting Division

    (OMCD) in the mid- 1960s. Main objective for this division is solve

    operational problems (Toyota & suppliers). OMCD is the organizational

    unit within Toyota with responsibility to acquire, store, and diffuse

    valuable production knowledge that resides within Toyotas production

    network. This provides direct on-site free assistance to all memberssuppliers to sort out problems. Average No of visits 4.2 per year. The

  • 8/8/2019 B2B Group2 Section B

    8/15

    U.S. version of OMCD is setup in 1992 (TSSC Toyota Supplier Support

    Center). Problems faced in transferring tacit knowledge can be the cultural

    and management issues and consultancy projects are time consuming

    and resource intensive.

    Benefits through TSSC

    Supplier started learning faster after TSSC

    Inventory reduction of 75%

    Productivity improvement by 124%

    Problem solving teams from TSSC / QAD from Toyota

    Fix quality problems and enable supplier-supplier KS

    Jishuken

    OMCD organized key suppliers into voluntary study groups (a.k.ajishuken). Each group had similar production processes. Members in

    each group to assist each other with productivity and quality

    improvements. Group formation is based on geographic proximity,

    competition and relations with Toyota. Groups usually reorganized every

    3 years to maintain diversity of ideas.

    Activities of Jishuken :

    Determine central theme for the year

    Visit each others plants as consultants along with an OMCD

    member

    Consulting Phases

    Preliminary inspection

    Diagnosis and experimentation

  • 8/8/2019 B2B Group2 Section B

    9/15

    Presentation

    Follow up/evaluation

    Annual meeting of all jishuken groups to share knowledge

    Plant Development Activity (PDA)

    Plant development Activity or PDA was established in 1994 to replicate

    jishuken model in US. Initially it was formed with 3 groups with 11

    suppliers in each group, but later on 15 more suppliers were added to it.

    Although , it led to problems with experienced suppliers getting frustratedwith lacking skill and knowledge base of inexperienced suppliers. To

    manage that, Toyota then had to reorganize them into 4 groups based on

    skill set : -

    Orange (High skills; high experience)

    Blue (High skill; medium experience)

    Green (Medium skill; medium experience)

    Purple (Low skill; low experience)

    There were a certain criteria to which suppliers must meet in order to be

    eligble for membership of PDA. Supplier must be member of Bluegrass

    Automotive Manufacturers Association (BAMA) for atleast 1 year. This is

    to ensure that suppliers are assimilated into BAMA. It would also ensure a

    commitment from top management. Primary aim was to create more of a

    learning team rather than jishuken which are consulting teams.

  • 8/8/2019 B2B Group2 Section B

    10/15

    Shukko

    Shukko is the inter-firm employee transfers practice followed by Toyota

    and many Japanese firms. There are number of reasons because of which

    Toyota favours employing Shukko. Some of them are : -

    Helping assemblers maintain control of suppliers

    Opportunity to shed unwanted employees

    Creating network identity

    Transferring knowledge from Toyota to suppliers

    Understand supplier perspective

    Transfers can be permanent or temporary

    Network System

  • 8/8/2019 B2B Group2 Section B

    11/15

    Such a network system creates a social community among suppliers. It

    facilitates face-to-face interaction, while encouraging knowledge sharing;

    also it enables a lower cost of participation and increases value of

    participation.

    Maximizing Efficiency of Knowledge Transfer

    As had been discussed, Toyota employs variety of processes available for

    knowledge transfer - Jishuken, Suppliers Association etc. Each type of

    knowledge (tacit, explicit) is matched with the process (bilateral,

    multilateral) for highest efficiency.

    Toyotas US Knowledge Sharing Network

    Toyota successfully replicated its knowledge sharing network in US as well

    in a course of time. The following steps were taken by it for the same :

  • 8/8/2019 B2B Group2 Section B

    12/15

    Phase 1: Developing Weak Ties:

    Relationships of suppliers with Toyota were new

    No interaction b/w suppliers

    Knowledge Sharing Non-Existent

    Initiated Knowledge Sharing

    Established Suppliers Association expl. Knowldg.

    Created weak social ties among suppliers

    Supplier Motivation Show commitment to get more business

    Phase 2: Developing strong bilateral ties:

    Consultants at Suppliers Facilities

    Transferred tacit know-how

    Reciprocal Knowledge Sharing

    Feeling of indebtness and openness within suppliers network

    Comfortable with knowledge transfer activities

    Supplier Motivation Receive Knowledge Transfer from Toyota

    Phase 3: Developing strong ties among suppliers

    Divided Suppliers into Small learning teams Maximize learning

    Subnetworks within network

    Toyotas control over network Leadership position

    Supplier Motivation Rapid knowledge acquisition to be more

    competitive

  • 8/8/2019 B2B Group2 Section B

    13/15

    Evolution of knowledge sharing network

    Toyotas knowledge sharing model who has implementation has been

    time consumeing and resource intensive has been highly successful. Main

    reasons for its success are :

    Top management commitment

    Nurturing Sharing culture

    Flexibility in decision making

    Building and maintaining high levels of trust

  • 8/8/2019 B2B Group2 Section B

    14/15

    Conclusion

    Toyotas knowledge sharing models successfully solves three dilemmas of

    value chain, which are, motivated members to participate and openly

    share knowledge, prevented members from free riding and efficiently

    transferred both explicit and implicit knowledge. It also shows that firms

    can achieve competitive advantage by building strong relationships with

    the suppliers and among the suppliers. The shared identity lowers the

    costs of communication and establishes explicit and tacit rules of

    coordination. Network can be more effective than a firm at the generation,

    transfer, and recombination of knowledge due to greater diversity of

    knowledge within a network.

  • 8/8/2019 B2B Group2 Section B

    15/15

    References

    The knowledge value chain: a pragmatic knowledge

    implementation network, Catherine L. Wang & Pervaiz K. Ahmed,

    Emraldinsight

    Creating and managing a highperformance knowledge-sharing

    network: the Toyota case, Jeffrey H. Dyer and Kentaro Nobeoka,

    Strategic Management Journal

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota

    http://www.1000ventures.com/business_guide/im_value_chain_main.

    html

    History of the TPS, Toyota Motor Manufacturing Kentucky Site,

    http://www.toyotageorgetown.com

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyotahttp://www.toyotageorgetown.com/http://www.toyotageorgetown.com/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota