Audience Feedback Results

We handed 13 questionnaires to our classmates while they watched out documentary and listen to our radio trailer while viewing our print advert.

Q1: Does the title ‘Industrial Bites’ fit our documentary?

• 13 people said yes.

Q2: Does the opening title sequence illustrate the topic of our documentary?

• 13 people said yes it does. However a few people gave points to improve on

next time such as : • They thought it was too fast. • They thought it was too much at once. Some people gave points that were good about it

such as : • That it clearly showed what the documentary was

about, and what we was about to see.

Q3: does the script anchor the topic of our documentary?

yes no 0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Overall 12 out of 13 people said the script anchored the documentary this helped as they where then able to understand what the documentary was about. I needed a strong script to be able to support the documentary, and convey our narrative. Some people gave tips for next time to improve on which was that it was very informative and contained detail that cam across easily.

Q4: is the voice over clear and easy to understand?

No

Yes

Do not know

Overall the majority of the class said that they could understand the voice over and it was clear, however 2 people said no and 3 people said do not know. Therefore next time I will take this into consideration that it may have been un clear in sections, and listen to areas that are fuzzy or our un clear to then re-do. As people who said this gave a point to improve which was they it stumbled in areas which I will highlight next time to re-do.

Q5: Is the documentary relative to the chosen audience (16-25)?

12- Yes 1- No Overall most of our classmates said that the documentary is relative to the chosen audience. This is what we aimed for so that our documentary is clear and the age range for our documentary is direct and appropriately fitting the audience. Some people gave us pointers is that, young people are more health aware, therefore making it attracting towards the target age range.

Q6: Name three strengths to our documentary.

interestingfactual

entertaininggood content

strong narrative good camera work

good cutawaysthe name

Mise-en-scenegood archive footage

the vocieover Interviews soundbed

opening

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 910

This question consisted of people saying three strengths that our documentary has. Overall there was 14 strengths that people said the top three was: interviews, good cutaways and strong narrative. This implies we had a strong documentary that was able to communicate the theme across in a compelling way to the audience.

Q7: Name three weaknesses to our documentary?

sound

vocie

over

backgro

und

editing

postioning o

f the in

terviewee

jump cuts

vox p

ops02468

101214

Overall people said our sound to our documentary was not good in areas for example one section is the M&S advert and on the first interview with Charlotte Forde, the sound started to pop however to improve this for next time we will listen to the audio and adapt the levels on premier pro.

Q8: After watching the first 5 minutes, would you be interested in watching the rest of the

documentary? Why?

•11Yes

•1Un-sure

•1No

Overall these results indicate that our documentary was engaging and intriguing for the audience to watch if the majority would watch it after the first 5 minutes. This was because they stated that they wanted to find out more on the topic and that the narrative was interesting and all was relevant to the topic.

Q9: On a scale of 1-5 please rate the following aspects to our documentary

1

2

3

4

5

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Mise-en-scene

Mise-en-scene For the first answer (mise-en-

scene) the majority rating was high and consisted of 4-5 which highlighted our mise-en-scene was good and conveyed what the topic was about by relating back to the interview that was taken place.

1

2

3

4

5

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Editing

Editing

Overall our editing mostly came back as a 3, meaning it was okay, however next time we will be more specific with our editing to make sure it flows and does not have any jump cuts or overlaps.

1

2

3

4

5

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Camerawork

Camerawork

This results show us that our classmates through our camerawork was good as the majority results came back as 7 people saying 4 and 3 people saying 5. This highlights that people thought or camerawork for our interviews was good therefore able to communicate the narrative.

1

2

3

4

5

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Professionalism

Professionalism

For our documentary our classmates rated it at a 4 for professionalism of our documentary. This was because our content was good and consisted well through out conveying a strong narrative.

Radio trailer

Q10: Would our radio trailer make you want to watch our documentary?

Yes No

11 2

The results show that our radio trailer is intriguing and engaging as 11 out of 13 people in our class said that they would watch our documentary ‘Industrial Bites’ just based of our radio trailer. This conveyed that the information involved in was detailed enough to attract our audience.

Q11: What do you think the strengths and weakness are of our Radio Trailer?

strengths Proffesionalismattention Informativemusiccontentinterviewsintersetingvocieovereditingnarrationsound

Weaknesses

sound levels

music

unclear

vocie over

interviews

no weak-nesess

• Strengths: Overall the top strength was that they thought our Radio trailer was informative, this implies that not only was it interesting which was second best along with content, but it was informative in the way it contained the right amount of detail to be able to highlight to the audience the documentary will be about. We had 17 strengths, instead of 13 and this is due to them writing two strengths instead of just one however we found out that the people who wrote two strengths, then highlighted that they thought there was not any weakness.

• Weaknesses: Overall 5 people said that our Radio Trailer didn’t have any weakness which implies it is a strong Trailer which follows codes and conventions of a radio trailer being able to convey the correct detail to our audience. We had other results which consisted of that; our sound levels varied along with the background music. This maybe because the music over powered the voice over therefore effecting the sound levels, next we will reduced the levels of the background music to avoid this from happening.

Q12: Is the voice over for the Radio Trailer clear and informal and why?

2No

11Yes

Overall the voice over the Radio Trailer results came back as clear and informal and this is because our class mates said that the voice over was good and clear, however the people who said no highlighted that the sound is low and is hard to understand this maybe because the sound levels may have been affected, or the voice over is not clear in areas due to the background music.

Print Advert

Q13: Would the print advert make you want to watch our documentary?

YES NO

11 2

Q14: Do you think our image works well?

YES NO KIND OF

10 1 2

Q15: Does it connote the topic of our documentary?

YES NO

12 1

Overall we had the majority of our classmates said that after seeing our print advert they would most likely watch our documentary, this portrays that our print advert has a clear link to the documentary. Also it conveys that the codes and conventions that we followed during the process of creating it, makes it appealing to the audience.

The results for if they thought our images worked well highlighted that 10 out of 13 believed they did showing that our theme and narrative can be seen within the images. Implying the clear link between each image.

Overall the final question was if they thought the print advert connoted the topic of our documentary. 12 out of 13 people said that the topic was displayed within the print advert , this implies that our narrative structure is clear and that it has clear links to our documentary.

Q16: Overall do you think our three products work well together? And why?

YES NO0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Overall this last question sums up how our audience viewed our products and if they believed that all three products worked well together. The feedback that was given back was that each product followed the theme of our documentary as well as all linking to each other. They were well produced, and clear.