an overview of the status quo, prospects and outlook of market mechanisms
TRANSCRIPT
An overview of the status quo, prospects and outlook of market mechanisms Side Event: Carbon market mechanisms – status, future and prospects02 December, 2015 – COP21 Paris – German Pavilion
Carsten Warnecke - [email protected]
www.newclimate.org 2
Content
Status quo of the CDMRBF as alternativeOptions for markets post Paris Conclusions
02 December 2015
Carbon Markets in Negotiations
3www.newclimate.org02 December 2015
COP 13 │ Bali Action Plan outlines ‘Various Approaches’ including opportunities of using markets for enhanced mitigation
COP 16 │ Decides to consider establishment of one or more market mechanisms in COP 17
COP 17 │ Defines a New Market Mechanism (NMM) AWG-LCA was requested to conduct a work programme on elaborating the modalities and procedures of the NMM and to consider a ‘Framework for Various Approaches’
No substantive progress on elaborating the mechanisms thereafter
ADP 2-11 │ Draft agreement text Article 3 discusses cooperative approaches and a ‘mechanism to support sustainable development‘
COP 18 │ Work Programme on NMM and FVA transferred to SBSTA after the closure of AWG-LCA; focus on outlining the key elements of the NMM and
elaborate FVA
2007
CDM opens for business2006
2010
2011
2012
2015
4
Status Quo of CDM projects
Registered CDM projects face substantial challenges due to record low CER prices
Implemented projects may no longer be able to cover their operational costs and/or transaction costsProjects might not be implemented, shut down or modified for continuation outside the CDM
Empirical analysis of the situation of CDM project activities on different levels: globally, project types (26) and host countries (22)Creation of a database with detailed information from 1075 projects; sample approach representing ~ 80% of the CDM>30 questions related to project status, CER marketing, barriers, costs, and support
02 December 2015 www.newclimate.org
www.newclimate.org 5
Projects implemented
Up to 85% of registered CDM projects with registration date in or before 2012 have full technical implementationExcl. China and India just up to 68% of projects are fully implemented
02 December 2015
85%
6%
1%1%2%
5%
<1%
Projectimplementation
status
Fully implemented
Implementation / construction started
Investment decision made
Planning phase
No implementation planned
Dismantling of implemented activity
I do not know.
What is the technical implementation status of the CDM GHG mitigation activity?
Source: Warnecke, Day, Klein 2015. Analysing the status quo of CDM projects: Status and prospects http://newclimate.org/2015/05/16/analysing-the-status-quo-of-cdm-projects/
www.newclimate.org 6
Projects operational
Up to 79% of registered CDM projects are in regular operationExcl. China and India just up to 53% of projects are operationalThe rate of operational projects globally could decline by 5% within the next 12 months
02 December 2015
79%
3%
1%1% 15%
CDM component operational
status
In regular operation
Regular operation temporarily stopped
Regular operation permanently stopped
Regular operation not started, no GHGmitigationNo CDM-conformant operation, alternativeGHG mitigation equipment operatingI do not know
What is the operational status of the CDM component of the GHG mitigation activity?
Source: Warnecke, Day, Klein 2015. Analysing the status quo of CDM projects: Status and prospects http://newclimate.org/2015/05/16/analysing-the-status-quo-of-cdm-projects/
www.newclimate.org 7
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
CER revenues still sufficientCDM still required to overcome non-financial barriersA stop of the GHG mitigation equipment does not result in cost savingsThe investment (decision) is irreversible.Continuation is required due to binding legal contracts.Continuation is required by national laws or regulations.Project activity / emission source will be covered under an ETSExpectations exist to receive alt. support or convert to alt. project schemeOther reason.
Responses: 543 Error margin: 10%
Project continuation
CER revenues sufficient for <3% of implemented projectsHigh rate of irreversible investments (N2O lowest)Expectations for altern. support63% of N2O discontinue before the end of the CP, 10% continue outside the CDM
02 December 2015
Despite the recent drop in CER prices, what are the reasons to continue with the CDM GHG mitigation activity?
Source: Warnecke, Day, Klein 2015. Analysing the status quo of CDM projects: Status and prospects http://newclimate.org/2015/05/16/analysing-the-status-quo-of-cdm-projects/
www.newclimate.org 8
Price requirements
For 53% CER prices below €5 are sufficient to continue V&I activitiesLow price requirements might include acceptance of sunk costsAsian countries show trend for being able to continue with lower prices N2O, HFC and wind with lowest price requirements
02 December 2015
What CER price level is required by the project to continue verification & issuance activities?
Source: Warnecke, Day, Klein 2015. Analysing the status quo of CDM projects: Status and prospects http://newclimate.org/2015/05/16/analysing-the-status-quo-of-cdm-projects/
www.newclimate.org 9
RBF in a nutshell
RBF is a financing modality not a new mechanism Finance is dispersed upon achievement of predefined result (ex-post)Inherent in existing climate finance mechanisms, CDM, REDD and discussed in the context of NAMAs and the GCFBenefits for carbon markets: Short term support through CER purchase and cancelationBenefits for climate finance: Quantification of short-term interventions with proven approaches02 December 2015
www.newclimate.org 10
Range of RBF variety
RBF variety in climate policy
02 December 2015
Upfront payment
Payment on results –
quantitative/ qualitative
Payment on results - tCO2e
based
Grant/ concessional
finance(e.g. ODA)
Payment for mitigation (e.g. CER purchase &
retirement)
Advanced market commitments
(e.g. FIT)
Payment for eco systems services
(e.g. REDD)
Methodological stringencyHigh certainty of outputsStrong verification need
Long term (indirect) impactsDevelopment benefitsAddress multiple barriers
Payment for mitigation (e.g.
NAMA)
Carbon Market Mechanisms (e.g. CDM)
Tradable units/ offsets (tCO2e)
Source: Warnecke, et al. 2015. Connecting the dots - Results-based financing in climate policy, http://newclimate.org/2015/08/27/connecting-the-dots-results-based-financing-in-climate-policy/
www.newclimate.org 11
Options for market mechanisms in international cooperation
Outcome based targets (e.g. absolute
emissions target)
Individual actions (e.g. domestic carbon
market mechanisms)
Sector based targetsPo
tenti
al e
lem
ents
and
su
ppor
ting
polic
ies/
prog
ram
mes
fo
r im
plem
enta
tion
International market mechanism
Part of the international contribution that is to be achieved through domestic emission reductions
Additional international contribution that is to be reached through the purchase of international offset credits
Additional reductions achieved for selling as
international offset credits
Country without additional offset target or selling opportunities
Outcome based targets
Individual actions
Sector based targets
Cont
ributi
on c
ount
ry B
Option 3: Carbon market instruments to implement the domestic part of the international contribution, possibly linked
Inte
rnati
onal
acti
onDo
mes
tic a
ction
Cont
ributi
on c
ount
ry A
Option 1
Climate financingPurchase and retirement of credits
Option 2
Links
Outcome based targets
Individual actions
Sector based targets
Cont
ributi
on c
ount
ry C
02 December 2015
Source: Höhne, Warnecke, Day, Röser 2015. Carbon market mechanisms in future international cooperation on climate change http://newclimate.org/2015/06/09/market-mechanisms-in-future-international-cooperation-on-climate-change/
www.newclimate.org 12
Conclusions
Use of markets is an important policy instrument in many countries
Sizeable number of Parties express use of markets in achieving their mitigation objectivesInternational market mechanism cooperation remains important and vital
Country ambition still not high enough to close the emission gap
Range of policies and mechanisms needed to reduce this gapInternational markets might serve as ambition raising mechanism
02 December 2015
www.newclimate.org 13
Thank you for your attention!
Carsten Warnecke, NewClimate Institute [email protected]
Further reading: www.newclimate.org/publications
Connecting the dots - Results-based financing in climate policy - July 2015Carbon market mechanisms in future international cooperation on climate change - June 2015Analysing the status quo of CDM projects: Status and prospects - May 2015
02 December 2015
Agenda Item Presenter
Introductory remarks Niklas Höhne (NewClimate Institute)
An overview of the status quo, prospects and outlook of market mechanisms Carsten Warnecke (NewClimate Institute)
Potential offset demand from international transport and availability of supply
Martin Cames (Öko-Institut)
Quantifying the current mitigation impact of the Clean Development Mechanism
Thomas Day (NewClimate Institute)
Results-based climate funding through crediting mechanisms – Assessment of key design options
Lambert Schneider (Associate to SEI)
Respondent Silke Karcher (BMUB)Q & A
Side EventCarbon market mechanisms– status, future and prospects
www.newlimate.org