rubric: powerpoint presentation rubric 16...
Post on 04-Jun-2018
222 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Rubric: PowerPoint Presentation Rubric 16 Minute
Armstrong Atlantic State University
Student: _____________________
This rubric is meant to help guide in the creation of your PowerPoint presentation project. Each category in the far left column represents a component of the project that will be taken into consideration when composing the final grade for this assignment. Review the rubric carefully before, during and after the creation of the PowerPoint presentation, to ensure that all intended elements of your destination have been represented and all other criteria have been met.
Grading Rubric
Excellent 5 pts
Very Good 4 pts
Fair 2 pts
Poor 1 pts
Content Excellent Slides contain relevant information. Content is based on information in the text. Content includes additional detailed information found in further researching the topic.
Very Good Slides with some relevant information. Topic is somewhat discussed but more information is required. Content includes a few additional points found in further researching the topic.
Fair Slides contain minimal information relevant to topic.Topic is slightly discussed but more material is needed. Content does not include additional information found in further research.
Poor Slides do not contain relevant information. Topic is addressed but not discussed or elaborated on.
Structure Excellent Presentation has the following recommended structure: Overview Summary Background Method Results Discussion Conclusion Citations -Relevant subtopics provided within each area, chronological order followed
Very Good Recommended structure followed but subheadings inappropriate or not chronological
Fair Recommended structure somewhat followed
Poor Recommended structure not followed
Graphics/Use of Media Excellent Slides are attractive. Text is legible. No grammatical errors. Graphics and effects are
Very Good Slides are attractive. Text is legible. No grammatical errors. More than half of the slides
Fair Slides are legible. Amount of text is too great for the amount of space provided. Some grammatical
Poor The slides are not legible. The amount of text is too great for the space provided. There are several
Page 1 of 3print rubric: RCampus Open Tools for Open Minds
2/6/2013https://www.rcampus.com/rubricprinteditc.cfm?mode=1
used throughout to enhance presentation. Information is at the advanced level and consistently supports images. Uses other technology into slides to enhance materials
use graphics and effects to enhance presentation. Information adequately supports images. Some use of media.
errors. Less than half the slides have graphics or effects. Information supports images at times. Minimal use of media.
grammatical errors. There is little use of graphics or effects. The information does not consistently support images. No evidence of media used to enhance the materials of slides.
Presentation Excellent The presentation is well coordinated. All material is presented using language that is original. Speaker is well informed and elaborates beyond the displayed material.
Very Good The presentation is well coordinated. Most material is presented in new form and not as it is written on the screen.
Fair The presenters make minimal eye contact with the audience. Everything is read directly from the screen or page.
Poor The presenters make no contact with the audience. Everything is read directly from the screen of page.
Voice/Delivery Excellent Speaker presents
in a loud and clear voice and does not read from sheets
Very Good Speaker presents
in a loud and clear voice but sometimes reads from sheets
Fair Speakers
presents in a voice that is sometimes clear but constantly refers to the presentation
Poor Speaker does not
present in a loud or clear voice and reads simply from the presentation
Knowledge/ Team work Excellent Speaker is well informed and elaborates a bit beyond the material displayed. AND Each team member contributes to presentation as evidenced by materials and overall delivery of presentation.
Very Good Speaker is well informed and elaborates a bit beyond the material displayed. AND Some team work is evident through presentation of materials.
Fair Speaker brings little knowledge to the presentation beyond what is displayed. AND Minimal evidence of team work is shown.
Poor Speaker simply reads the material displayed. AND There is no evidence of team work displayed through slides and/or presentation of materials.
Time Usage Excellent Presentation meets the 16 minute time requirement.
Very Good Presentation is 1-2 minutes under the 16 minute time requirement.
Fair Presentation is 3-4 minutes under the 16 minute time requirement.
Poor Presentation is 5 or more minutes or more under the 16 minute time requirement.
Page 2 of 3print rubric: RCampus Open Tools for Open Minds
2/6/2013https://www.rcampus.com/rubricprinteditc.cfm?mode=1
Graphs/Tables/Equations
Excellent All Graphs/Tables/ Equations are legible and thoroughly addressed and interpreted, all variables are explained
Very Good All Graphs/Tables/ Equations are legible and somewhat addressed and interpreted, most variables are explained
Fair Some Graphs/Tables/ Equations are legible and somewhat thoroughly addressed and interpreted, a few variables are explained
Poor Graphs/Tables/ Equations are not legible and not addressed or interpreted, variables are not explained
references Excellent All important factual statements relevant to the engineering phenomena are cited in accordance with IEEE format
Very Good Most factual statements relevant to the engineering phenomena are cited in accordance with IEEE format
Fair A few important factual statements relevant to the engineering phenomena are cited in accordance with IEEE format
Poor No references or citations are provided
questions Excellent team was able to answer all questions directly and effectively communicated answers at a level appropiate for audience
Very Good team was able to answer most questions directly and effectively communicated answers at a level appropiate for audience
Fair team was somewhat able to answer most questions directly and reasonably communicated answers at a level appropiate for audience
Poor team was not able to answer all questions directly nor effectively communicate answers at a level appropiate for audience
Build free rubrics at www.iRubric.com. Rubric Code: R95W8C
Page 3 of 3print rubric: RCampus Open Tools for Open Minds
2/6/2013https://www.rcampus.com/rubricprinteditc.cfm?mode=1
top related