rubric: powerpoint presentation rubric 16...

3
Rubric: PowerPoint Presentation Rubric 16 Minute Armstrong Atlantic State University Student: _____________________ This rubric is meant to help guide in the creation of your PowerPoint presentation project. Each category in the far left column represents a component of the project that will be taken into consideration when composing the final grade for this assignment. Review the rubric carefully before, during and after the creation of the PowerPoint presentation, to ensure that all intended elements of your destination have been represented and all other criteria have been met. Grading Rubric Excellent 5 pts Very Good 4 pts Fair 2 pts Poor 1 pts Content Excellent Slides contain relevant information. Content is based on information in the text. Content includes additional detailed information found in further researching the topic. Very Good Slides with some relevant information. Topic is somewhat discussed but more information is required. Content includes a few additional points found in further researching the topic. Fair Slides contain minimal information relevant to topic.Topic is slightly discussed but more material is needed. Content does not include additional information found in further research. Poor Slides do not contain relevant information. Topic is addressed but not discussed or elaborated on. Structure Excellent Presentation has the following recommended structure: Overview Summary Background Method Results Discussion Conclusion Citations -Relevant subtopics provided within each area, chronological order followed Very Good Recommended structure followed but subheadings inappropriate or not chronological Fair Recommended structure somewhat followed Poor Recommended structure not followed Graphics/Use of Media Excellent Slides are attractive. Text is legible. No grammatical errors. Graphics and effects are Very Good Slides are attractive. Text is legible. No grammatical errors. More than half of the slides Fair Slides are legible. Amount of text is too great for the amount of space provided. Some grammatical Poor The slides are not legible. The amount of text is too great for the space provided. There are several Page 1 of 3 print rubric: RCampus Open Tools for Open Minds 2/6/2013 https://www.rcampus.com/rubricprinteditc.cfm?mode=1

Upload: hoangnguyet

Post on 04-Jun-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Rubric: PowerPoint Presentation Rubric 16 Minuteengineering.armstrong.edu/cameron/rubricprinteditc.pdf · Rubric: PowerPoint Presentation Rubric 16 Minute Armstrong Atlantic State

Rubric: PowerPoint Presentation Rubric 16 Minute

Armstrong Atlantic State University

Student: _____________________

This rubric is meant to help guide in the creation of your PowerPoint presentation project. Each category in the far left column represents a component of the project that will be taken into consideration when composing the final grade for this assignment. Review the rubric carefully before, during and after the creation of the PowerPoint presentation, to ensure that all intended elements of your destination have been represented and all other criteria have been met.

Grading Rubric

Excellent 5 pts

Very Good 4 pts

Fair 2 pts

Poor 1 pts

Content Excellent Slides contain relevant information. Content is based on information in the text. Content includes additional detailed information found in further researching the topic.

Very Good Slides with some relevant information. Topic is somewhat discussed but more information is required. Content includes a few additional points found in further researching the topic.

Fair Slides contain minimal information relevant to topic.Topic is slightly discussed but more material is needed. Content does not include additional information found in further research.

Poor Slides do not contain relevant information. Topic is addressed but not discussed or elaborated on.

Structure Excellent Presentation has the following recommended structure: Overview Summary Background Method Results Discussion Conclusion Citations -Relevant subtopics provided within each area, chronological order followed

Very Good Recommended structure followed but subheadings inappropriate or not chronological

Fair Recommended structure somewhat followed

Poor Recommended structure not followed

Graphics/Use of Media Excellent Slides are attractive. Text is legible. No grammatical errors. Graphics and effects are

Very Good Slides are attractive. Text is legible. No grammatical errors. More than half of the slides

Fair Slides are legible. Amount of text is too great for the amount of space provided. Some grammatical

Poor The slides are not legible. The amount of text is too great for the space provided. There are several

Page 1 of 3print rubric: RCampus Open Tools for Open Minds

2/6/2013https://www.rcampus.com/rubricprinteditc.cfm?mode=1

Page 2: Rubric: PowerPoint Presentation Rubric 16 Minuteengineering.armstrong.edu/cameron/rubricprinteditc.pdf · Rubric: PowerPoint Presentation Rubric 16 Minute Armstrong Atlantic State

used throughout to enhance presentation. Information is at the advanced level and consistently supports images. Uses other technology into slides to enhance materials

use graphics and effects to enhance presentation. Information adequately supports images. Some use of media.

errors. Less than half the slides have graphics or effects. Information supports images at times. Minimal use of media.

grammatical errors. There is little use of graphics or effects. The information does not consistently support images. No evidence of media used to enhance the materials of slides.

Presentation Excellent The presentation is well coordinated. All material is presented using language that is original. Speaker is well informed and elaborates beyond the displayed material.

Very Good The presentation is well coordinated. Most material is presented in new form and not as it is written on the screen.

Fair The presenters make minimal eye contact with the audience. Everything is read directly from the screen or page.

Poor The presenters make no contact with the audience. Everything is read directly from the screen of page.

Voice/Delivery Excellent Speaker presents

in a loud and clear voice and does not read from sheets

Very Good Speaker presents

in a loud and clear voice but sometimes reads from sheets

Fair Speakers

presents in a voice that is sometimes clear but constantly refers to the presentation

Poor Speaker does not

present in a loud or clear voice and reads simply from the presentation

Knowledge/ Team work Excellent Speaker is well informed and elaborates a bit beyond the material displayed. AND Each team member contributes to presentation as evidenced by materials and overall delivery of presentation.

Very Good Speaker is well informed and elaborates a bit beyond the material displayed. AND Some team work is evident through presentation of materials.

Fair Speaker brings little knowledge to the presentation beyond what is displayed. AND Minimal evidence of team work is shown.

Poor Speaker simply reads the material displayed. AND There is no evidence of team work displayed through slides and/or presentation of materials.

Time Usage Excellent Presentation meets the 16 minute time requirement.

Very Good Presentation is 1-2 minutes under the 16 minute time requirement.

Fair Presentation is 3-4 minutes under the 16 minute time requirement.

Poor Presentation is 5 or more minutes or more under the 16 minute time requirement.

Page 2 of 3print rubric: RCampus Open Tools for Open Minds

2/6/2013https://www.rcampus.com/rubricprinteditc.cfm?mode=1

Page 3: Rubric: PowerPoint Presentation Rubric 16 Minuteengineering.armstrong.edu/cameron/rubricprinteditc.pdf · Rubric: PowerPoint Presentation Rubric 16 Minute Armstrong Atlantic State

Graphs/Tables/Equations

Excellent All Graphs/Tables/ Equations are legible and thoroughly addressed and interpreted, all variables are explained

Very Good All Graphs/Tables/ Equations are legible and somewhat addressed and interpreted, most variables are explained

Fair Some Graphs/Tables/ Equations are legible and somewhat thoroughly addressed and interpreted, a few variables are explained

Poor Graphs/Tables/ Equations are not legible and not addressed or interpreted, variables are not explained

references Excellent All important factual statements relevant to the engineering phenomena are cited in accordance with IEEE format

Very Good Most factual statements relevant to the engineering phenomena are cited in accordance with IEEE format

Fair A few important factual statements relevant to the engineering phenomena are cited in accordance with IEEE format

Poor No references or citations are provided

questions Excellent team was able to answer all questions directly and effectively communicated answers at a level appropiate for audience

Very Good team was able to answer most questions directly and effectively communicated answers at a level appropiate for audience

Fair team was somewhat able to answer most questions directly and reasonably communicated answers at a level appropiate for audience

Poor team was not able to answer all questions directly nor effectively communicate answers at a level appropiate for audience

Build free rubrics at www.iRubric.com. Rubric Code: R95W8C

Page 3 of 3print rubric: RCampus Open Tools for Open Minds

2/6/2013https://www.rcampus.com/rubricprinteditc.cfm?mode=1