rhic operations and plans

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES

Electron Cooling at RHIC

Enhancement of Average Luminosity for Heavy Ion Collisions at RHIC

R&D Plans and Simulation Studies

8th ICFA SeminarKyungpook Natioanl University

Daegu, Korea, September 29, 2005

Satoshi Ozaki for the RHIC e-Cool TeamBrookhaven National Laboratory

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES

RHIC Operations and Plans

• Run 1: FY 2000 28 wks Au-Au (130 GeV/A)• Run 2:FY 2001-02 40 wks Au-Au (200 GeV/A) p↑-p↑ (200 GeV)• Run 3:FY 2003 29 wks d-Au (200 GeV/A) p↑-p↑ (200 GeV) ~30% Pol.• Run 4:FY 2004 27 wks Au-Au (200, 62 GeV/A) p↑-p↑ (200 GeV)• Run 5:FY 2005 32 wks Cu-Cu (200, 62 GeV/A) p↑-p↑ (200 GeV) ~50% Pol

Near term improvements in progress• Superconducting helical snakes in the AGS for higher polarization for FY 2006 Runs• Development of EBIS ion source for flexibility of ion operation

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES

First Five Years of RHIC Experiments

• The luminosity performance of RHIC for Au-Au & Cu-Cu collisions exceeded the design values.

• We observed creation of a new state of matter in Au-Au collisions at 200 GeV/A collision energy: – hot, dense and strongly coupled, – behaving like perfect fluid.

• Next stage of the program:– Study properties of the new state of matter– Study of rare processes Requires much higher

average/integrated luminosity

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES

Typical Au-Au Operation on Feb. 23, 2004

Au Beam Intensity vs. Time

Au-Au Luminosity vs. Time

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES

Control of Emittance Growth: Cooling

• The Au-Au luminosity life-time is only a few hours• Strong intra-beam scatterings cause emittance growth:

– Longitudinal: loss of ions from colliding buckets– Transverse: larger crossing beam spot size

• Cooling of ion beams: the key to a longer luminosity life-time: i.e., a higher average luminosity

• Cooling:– Stochastic cooling: more effective for hot beam

• Difficult for bunched Proton beams but it appears that it can work for heavy ion beams in RHIC

• Longitudinal cooling test in preparation– Electron cooling: more effective for cool beam

• It has been successful at lower energies but has not been demonstrated at high energy like RHIC

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES

The Objectives of RHIC e-Cooling and Challenges

• ~10 times Increase of RHIC average luminosity for Au-Au at 100 GeV/A

• Reduce background due to beam loss

• Keep short collision diamond by maintaining short bunch length to match detector’s acceptance

• Cooling rate slows in proportion to 7/2.

• Energy of electrons needed (54 MeV) is well above DC accelerators.

• Requires bunched e beam.

• Need exceptionally high electron bunch charge and low emittance.

• Need ERL to provide low emittance e-beam while maintaining a reasonable power demand.

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES

R&D: Theory Issues

• We must understand cooling physics in a new regime:

– understanding IBS, recombination, disintegration– binary collision simulations for benchmarking– experimental benchmarking of the magnetized cooling

efficiency issues

• Cooling dynamics simulations with precision

• A good estimate of the luminosity gain is essential.

• Simulations show that:10X increase in the average luminosity can be

achieved(from 7x1026 to ~7x1027 cm-2s-1)

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES

Parameters for of RHIC Magnetized e-cooling

Key e-beam parameters:– Bunch charge: q = 20nC– E-Beam Energy = 54MeV E/E < 3x10-4 – Emittance: 50m-rad– Magnetization: 380mm.mr

Energy Recovery Linac– fSRF: 703.5 MHz– Repetition rate: 9.4 MHz

Cooling solenoids:

2 x 40m long

B = 5T, B/B < 10-5

Collider operation:

Collisions at 3 IPs,

*=0.5m,

112 bunches

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES

Ne/bunch=3*1011

w/ cooling. *=0.5m

w/o cooling, *=1m

Simulation for Au-Au at 100 GeV/A

Luminosities per IP in cm-2sec-1 vs. time in seconds

The luminosity gain may be limited either by the collision beam burn out or the beam-beam parameter

X, Y, Z Distribution ()

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES

R&D: ERL and Cooling Hardware Issues

– Development of a high current low emittance RF Gun:– photocathode, laser, etc.

– Design of a high current & very low emittance ERL

– Development of beam diagnostics

– Beam dynamics studies

– Further refinements of simulation codes

– Development of high field solenoid with B/B<105

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES

Laser Photocathode S/C RF Gun: Key to performance

1 ½ cell gun designed for cooler

½ cell gun prototype: Under construction

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES

Diamond Amplified Photocathode

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

0 5 10

Gradient (MV/m)

Ele

ctro

n tr

ansm

issi

on g

ain

5keV

4keV

3keV

2keV

Electron Amplifying Diamond Window•Less demanding on laser power•Longer cathode life•Protect SC cavities from contamination

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES

Schematics for Magnetized Beam ERL Lattice

←Compressor Stretcher→

Gun Z-bend merger

Cooling solenoids in RHIC ring

ERL Beam Dump

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES

The Possibility of Non-magnetized Electron Cooling

• Handling of magnetized beams is not easy, and the system is complex and expensive.

• At high , achievable solenoid error limits the cooling speed of the magnetized cooling.

Another way is the non-magnetized e-cooling:• A study showed that sufficient cooling rates can be achieved

with non-magnetized cooling.• Recombination beam loss is a concern but can be managed

to be small enough to assure a long luminosity life-time– By reduced bunch charge– By larger beam size

• Helical undulator can further reduce recombination**Suggested by Derbenev, and independently by Litvinenko

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES

Non-magnetized Cooling: Parameters Beam Parameters:• Rms momentum spread of electrons =10-3

• Rms normalized emittance: 2.5 µmrad• Rms radius of electron beam in cooling section: 2.5 mm• Rms bunch length: 5 cm• Charge per bunch: 5nC (cf. 20nC for magnetized case)• Cooling sections: 2x30 m• Large ion beam in the cooling section: β* = 200 m

All ERL technology developments for mag-cool applies here but• without complex magnetized electron beam gun, • without bunch stretcher and compressor, and• without complex beam optics to preserve magnetization

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES

Non-magnetized Cooling: SimulationAu-Au at 100 GeV/A

Magnetized CoolingNon-magnetized Cooling: Luminosity

Non-magnetized Cooling: Emittance

Non-magnetized Cooling: Bunch Length

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES

Beam Loss Comparison: Simulation

Recombination: OffUndulators: Off

Recombination: ONUndulators: OFF

Recombination: ONUndulators: ON

Undulator parameters:50 Gauss, 5 cm period,Radius of rotation 1.7 m

Beam Intensity

Time (sec)

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES

R&D ERL Under Construction

To study the issues of high-brightness, high-current electron beams as needed for RHIC II and eRHIC.

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES

SRF Cavity for High Current (Ampere Class) ERL

703.5 MHz 5 Cell Cavity with Beam Tune HOM Damping:

Built by Advanced Energy Systems Inc. of Long Island

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES

RHIC e-Cooling Project Milestones & Collaborations

• 2005 Dec: Electron cooling simulation completed• 2006 Jan: Decision on the cooling method• 2006 Feb: High power rf system for the gun in place• 2006 Apr: 5-cell superconducting cavity delivered• 2006: Beam dynamics simulation• 2006: Cost and Schedule of e-cooling system for CD0• 2007 Mar: Begin testing S/C gun,

hopefully with the diamond cathode• 2008: Hope to begin testing of ERL hardware

• The Milestones subject to the future funding level

• Collaborators: BINP, JINR, Celsius, GSI. US Jefferson Lab, Fermilab, Indiana Univ., and industry (AES and Tech-X)

• Supported by: the U.S. DOE, Division of Nuclear Physics, and partially bythe U.S. DOD HE Laser Joint Tech Office and ONR