can vigorous rootstock be used to manage verticillium wilt? ‘maxifort’

Post on 31-Jan-2016

28 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Cedar Meadow Farm. Can vigorous rootstock be used to manage verticillium wilt? ‘Maxifort’ How does grafting fit in with fumigation? Additive or alternative Can we reduce economic constraints through cultural methods? Plant spacing. Grafting Trial planted May 12th. Cultural Management. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

• Can vigorous rootstock be used to manage verticillium wilt?– ‘Maxifort’

• How does grafting fit in with fumigation?– Additive or alternative

• Can we reduce economic constraints through cultural methods?– Plant spacing

Cedar Meadow Farm

GraftingGraftingTrial plantedTrial planted

May 12thMay 12th

Cultural Management

Twin Leader

Fumigation Spacing Grafting

Yes

18”Non

‘Maxifort’

24”Non

‘Maxifort’

36”Non

‘Maxifort’

No

18”Non

‘Maxifort’

24”Non

‘Maxifort’

36”Non

‘Maxifort’

Cedar Meadow Farm

• Fall Fumigation

• ‘BHN 589’

• “Twin-heading”

• Disease ratings

• Data collection

• Mid-October

Cedar Meadow FarmNon Maxifort Non Maxifort Non Maxifort

12’

Non Maxifort Non Maxifort Non Maxifort

12’

GraftinGraftingg

ScionScion

RootstoRootstockck

Maxifort rootstock-gone Maxifort rootstock-gone wild!wild!

High horsepowerHigh horsepower“Grafted”Grafted” snow blower!snow blower!

Lancaster County - 2008: Main Effects

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

No Yes 18" 24" 36" Non Maxifort

Fumigant Plant Spacing Grafting

Ve

rtic

illiu

m w

ilt in

cid

en

ce

(%

)

P < 0.01 P = NS P = NS

A

B

Verticillium Wilt

Lancaster County - 2008: Main Effects

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

No Yes 18" 24" 36" Non Maxifort

Fumigant Plant Spacing Grafting

Ve

rtic

illiu

m w

ilt s

ev

eri

ty

P < 0.05 P = NS P < 0.01

B

A

Y

Z

Verticillium Wilt

Lancaster County - 2008: Main Effects

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

No Yes 18" 24" 36" Non Maxifort

Fumigant Plant Spacing Grafting

Ma

rke

tab

le y

ield

(to

ns

/ac

re)

YYZ

Z A

B

LSD based on P=0.01

Marketable Fruit Weight

Lancaster County - 2008

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

18" 24" 36" 18" 24" 36"

Non-grafted Maxifort

Mar

keta

ble

yie

ld (

ton

s/ac

re)

A

BB BC

CC

LSD based on P=0.05

Marketable Fruit Weight

LSD based on P=0.05

Marketable Yield (tons/acre)  Non-grafted Maxifort (Max-Non)

18" Spacing 50.13 B 58.74 C 8.61

24" Spacing 48.50 B 56.87 C 8.37

36" Spacing 40.94 A 52.13 BC 11.19

Marketable Fruit Weight

Lancaster County - Main Effects

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

18" 24" 36" Non Maxifort

Mar

keta

ble

fru

it n

um

ber

A

B

Z

YY

LSD based on P=0.05

Marketable Fruit Number

Lancaster County - Main Effects

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

0.45

0.50

0.55

18" 24" 36" Non Maxifort

Avg

fru

it w

eig

ht

(lb

s)

AB

LSD based on P=0.01

Marketable Fruit Size

Lancaster County - Main Effects: Grafting

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

18-Jul 1-Aug 15-Aug 29-Aug 12-Sep 26-Sep 10-Oct 24-Oct

Cu

mu

lati

ve m

arke

tab

le y

ield

(to

ns/

acre

)

Non-grafted

Maxifort

P<0.01

Yield Dynamics

Lancaster County - Main Effects: Plant Spacing

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

18-Jul 1-Aug 15-Aug 29-Aug 12-Sep 26-Sep 10-Oct 24-Oct

Cu

mu

lati

ve

ma

rke

tab

le y

ield

(to

ns

/ac

re)

18"

24"

36"

P<0.01

Yield Dynamics

P<0.01

Marketable Yield (lbs/plant)

Plant Spacing Non-grafted Maxifort

18" 20.89 24.48

24" 26.95 31.59

36" 34.12 43.45

Per Plant Productivity

None graftedNone grafted

GraftedGrafted

None graftedNone grafted

GraftedGrafted

Non GraftedNon Grafted

GraftedGrafted

The Bottom The Bottom line…line…Grafted-55.9 tons/A Grafted-55.9 tons/A

4,472- 25lb boxes/A4,472- 25lb boxes/A

Non-Grafted-46.5 tons/A Non-Grafted-46.5 tons/A

3,720- 25 lb. boxes/A3,720- 25 lb. boxes/A

20% increase in 20% increase in yieldyield

The Bottom The Bottom line…line…

9.4 more tons per acre9.4 more tons per acre Or, 752 more boxes per acreOr, 752 more boxes per acre @ $12.00 per box (#1’s and @ $12.00 per box (#1’s and

#2’s) = $9,024 increase#2’s) = $9,024 increase Or, $1.88 per plant increaseOr, $1.88 per plant increase

How much does it cost to How much does it cost to graft?graft?

Healing chamberHealing chamber Labor costsLabor costs Grow 2 sets of plantsGrow 2 sets of plants

Cary Rivard, Graduate Research AssistantNorth Carolina State University-Technical advisor

Is Grafting in your future?

Permanent Cover Cropping SystemPermanent Cover Cropping System

Steve GroffSteve GroffCedar Meadow Farm Cedar Meadow Farm

Holtwood, PA Holtwood, PA

steve@cedarmeadowfarm.steve@cedarmeadowfarm.

comcom

www.cedarmeadowfarm.com

• Fall fumigation did not reduce disease incidence and had no effect on fruit yield. Fumigation should have been done in the spring.

• ‘Maxifort’ rootstock increased yield across at all levels of plant spacing and fumigation.– Fruit size and number

• Similar per acre yields were seen with half the number of grafted plants.

• Increased spacing and ‘Maxifort’ slowed early season production.

• Per plant yield was increased by 4-10 lbs/plant with ‘Maxifort.

Summary

top related