添付 5 ムンバイ市跨線橋架替えプロジェクト説明資...

添付 5

ムンバイ市跨線橋架替えプロジェクト説明資料

Data Collection Surveyon Road/Railway Bridge Sector

Oriental Consultants Global Co., Ltd.1

August 2016Mumbai

ORIENTAL CONSULTANTS GLOBAL CO., LTD.

JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY

Explanatory Material ofReconstruction Project of ROBs in Mumbai

ORIENTAL CONSULTANTS CO., LTD.KATAHIRA & ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL

I. Introduction

II. Results of Site Inspection

III. Proposal for Reconstruction

IV. Study for Next Step

V. Application of High‐Elasticity CFRP

VI. Schedule

Contents ORIENTAL CONSULTANTS GLOBAL CO., LTD.

Ⅰ. Introduction ORIENTAL CONSULTANTS GLOBAL CO., LTD.

Based on discussion with Western Railway, MOR, Reconstruction of several Railway Bridges

were requested.

Interim Study Result is presented by this meeting.

Ⅱ. Results of Site Inspection

1. List of Target Damaged Bridges

Type of Bridge Location Number (18 Bri.) Bridge Name

ROBMumbai 7

(1) Ferere ROB (No. 1)(2) Belasis ROB (No. 2)(3) Mahalaxmi ROB (No. 3)(4) Delise ROB (No. 4)(5) Tilak ROB (No. 5)(6) Mahim ROB (No. 6)(7) Goregaon ROB (No. 7)

Vadodara 2(8) LC No. 5/A (No. 8)(9) LC No. 2/X (No. 9)

Railway Bridge

Mumbai 4

(1)No.73 (Vasai Creek)(2)No.75(Vasai Creek)(3)No.92 (Vasai Creek)(4)No.93 (Vasai Creek)

Ratlam 5

(5) No. 114(6) No. 129(7) No. 132(8) No. R5(9) No. R8

2. Location of Target Damaged Bridges

Mumbai

Vadodara

Ahmedabad

3. Summary of Inspection Results (ROB)

No. Bridge NameLength [m]

Span No.

Const. Year Superstructure Type Comments/ Next Step

Road over Bridge (ROB)

1 Ferere ROB 25.36 1 19212 Main Steel I‐Girder with cross girders

Most of bridges were constructed nearly 100

years ago

Reconstruction

2 Balasis ROB 31.50 5 1893 Steel I‐Girder

3Mahalaxmi

ROB77.00 5 1920 Steel I‐Girder

4 Delise ROB 63.20 3 19212 Main Steel I‐Girder with cross girders

5 Tilak ROB226.20

3 19252 Main Steel I‐Girder with cross girders

6 Mahim ROB 80.00 3 1993 PC I‐Shaped Girder

7 Goregaon ROB 79.00 2 1993 PC I‐Shaped Girder

8 LC No. 5/A 85.00 2 2012 PC Box GirderNon‐Destructive Survey

9 LC No. 2/A 35.08 1 2008 PC Box Girder

9 ROBs are selected for next step

3. Summary of Inspection Results (Railway Bridge)

No. Bridge NameLength [m]

Span No.

Const. Year Superstructure Type Comments/ Next Step

Railway Bridge

1 No. 73 1,450 29 1993 PC Box Girder

NO Next stepBecause of minor damage

2 No. 75 550 11 1993 PC Box Girder

3 No. 92 380 20 1963 Steel I‐Girder

4 No. 93 410 22 1963 Steel I‐Girder

5 No. 114 80 4 1960 PC I‐Shaped Girder

NO Next stepBecause, repaired by CFRP

already

8 No. R5 20 1 1960 PC I‐Shaped Girder

9 No. R8 20 1 1960 PC I‐Shaped Girder

Precondition

Ⅲ. Proposal for Reconstruction

1. Feature of this Project

The height of Girder need to be lower due to prevent the influence of surroundings.

⇒ New girder height shall be as thin as possible.

Construction period needs to be shorten.

Minimum negative impacton social environment.

(Construction in the minimum space)

Required

Bridges is in thecongested area

andNo space for diversion

Revision of Electric Supply System (DC → AC)

Clearance needs to be changed to 6.25m from 5m

2. Advanced Technology can be Adopted

Applicable Superstructure Type

① Bi‐Prestressing PC System② Pre‐flexed PC Beam③ Composite Floor Slab④ Steel I Girder with Steel Deck Plate⑤ Pony Truss

Construction

To reduce the Height of Road Surface

To make thin the Girder Height

25 30 35 40 45 50

Girder Height (m

Span Length (m)

concrete T shape

Steel I Girder with Steel Deck Plate

Bi‐Prestressing PC Beam

Pre‐flexed PC Beam

Type of Superstructure

Composite Floor Slab

2. Advanced Technology to be Adopted

① Bi‐Prestressing PC System

This construction method is to combine a conventional prestressed method (give compressive force to concrete by pulling PC Strand) with a Post‐compression method (give tension force to concrete by pushing PC strand).It is possible to reduce girder height and extend span length.

Ratio of Span Length and Girder Height = approx. 1/32

Compressive PC Strand

Tensile PC Strand

② Pre‐flexed PC Beam This is composite girder of steel girder andconcrete.

Steel girder is added pre‐flection in advance byvertical force and introduce pre‐stress by releaseafter casting concrete at lower flange.

It is possible to construct under very low girderheight compared to other method.

Ratio of Span Length and Girder Height= Approx. 1/35

Fabrication of Steel Girder with initial deflection

Pre‐flection of steel girder by vertical force

Release of vertical force and introduce Pre‐compressive force

Cast concrete at lower flange

③ Composite Floor Slab

Main girder is simple structure thatcomprises of T‐shape steel, bottomplate and filling concrete as maincross section.

To suppress an increase in girderheight by using T‐shaped steel withprojections as shear key.

Ratio of Span Length and GirderHeight = Approx. 1/30～ 1/42(extremely thin structure)

④ Steel I Girder with Steel Deck Plate

It is possible to reduce the selfweight of deck slab by using steeldeck plate to Steel I girder. Andlongitudinal reinforcing member isinstalled at steel deck plate. Steeldeck plate bears the role as a upperflange of main girder reinforced withreinforcing member, therefore thegirder height is suppressed.

Ratio of Span Length and GirderHeight = Approx. 1/30

⑤ Pony Truss

This method is to reduce a structure height under road by applying pony truss type.

Only reinforcing member is installed under deck slab, therefore, regardless of spanlength, structure height under road is about 1m.

Ratio of Span Length and Girder Height = Approx. over 75m

トラス間隔

道路全幅

車道幅

上弦材

斜材

下弦材

縦桁横桁

Applicable Foundation Type

① Cast‐in‐place Concrete Pile under low clearance② Rotary Penetration Steel Pile③ Steel Pipe Socket Connection Method

Construction

To reduce the space

To save the time

① Cast‐in‐place Concrete Pile under low clearance

Excavation Machine

This technique employs turntable type for driving system of excavation rod. It ispossible to construct at the height under 2m by combining a special type of kellyrod.

Construction of Cast‐in‐situ pile under low clearance (under existing bridge)becomes possible used by this special type of equipment.

② Rotary Penetration Steel Pile

It is Steel Pipe Foundation which is welded a spiral processed steel plate (Wing) to thetip of steel pipe together. The pile penetrates/screws into the ground with propulsion ofwing.

It is obtained large bearing force by the base enlarging effect of Wing. And, due topenetration method, there is no excavated soil at site. Therefore, it will be possible to beeco‐friendly construction with non‐emission, low‐vibration and reducing pile number.

Image of rotary penetration

③ Steel Pipe Socket Connection Method

Steel Pipe Socket Connection Method is the jointing technique of inserting a SteelColumn into Steel Pipe Socket which is constructed at the top of foundation, andfilling up a concrete inside the gap of it. It is possible to reduce construction period byomitting Pile Cap and Anchor Frame used in conventional method.

Connection part at tip of pier column

Construction of Caison Structure

3. Construction Process

3.1 Type of Existing Superstructure

1. Ferere ROB4. Delise ROB5. Tilak ROB

2. Balasis ROB3. Mahalaxmi ROB6. Mahim ROB7. Goregaon ROB

2‐Main Girder Type

※ Impossible for Step Construction ⇒ Quick Construction is Required

Conventional I/T‐Girder Type

※ Possible for Step Construction

3.2 Proposal for Construction Steps for A

Step‐1Install Cofferdam and Temporary Bridge and Construction of Abutment. (Secure existents traffic)

Cofferdam andTemporary Bridge Construction Period: 2 – 3 months

Step‐2Demolition of Deck Slab. (Close existing traffic)

Construction Period: 1 week

3.2 Proposal for Construction Steps for A

Step‐3

Step‐4

Removal of Steel Girder. (Close existing traffic)

Construction New Superstructure. (Close existing traffic)

Construction Period: 3 days

3.3 Proposal for Construction Steps for B

Step‐2

Step‐1

Construction Period: 2 – 3 months

Removal Part

Demolition of HALF of existing Abutment and Construction of HALF of New Abutment. (secure existing traffic but by limited width)

Removal of HALF of Superstructure (Secure existing traffic, but by limited

Demolish and Construct

width)

Step‐3

Step‐4

Erection of HALF of New Superstructure. (Secure existing traffic, but by limited width)

New Superstructure

Removal of remained Superstructure. (Secure existing traffic at New Superstructure part)

Removal Part

Step‐5

Step‐6

Construction Period: 2 – 3 months

Demolition of Remained of existing Abutment and construction of HALF of New Abutment. (Secure existing traffic but by limited width)

Erection of Remained of New Superstructure. (Secure existing traffic, but by limited

Demolition and Construction

New Superstructure

width)

3.4 Comparison of Bridge Type

Plan – 1Bi ‐ Prestressing PC Beam

Plan ‐ 2 Pre‐fixed PC Beam

Plan ‐ 3 Composite Floor Slab

Side View & Cross Section

Cost(Super

Structure)1.17 1.06 1.03

Comment

・ Transversal Prestressing is necessary, Step Construction is difficult. (Moderate)・Maintenance for re‐coating is unnecessary. (Good)・Due to requirement of high‐strength concrete, fabrication shall be done at specialized factory (Bad).

・ Step Construction is possible.(Good)・ Maintenance for re‐coating is unnecessary. (Good)・ Easy for erection of girder, however, construction of cross beam and deck slab shall be done at site (Moderate).

・ Step Construction is possible. (Good)・ Re‐coating is necessary only for Lower Deck Slab. (Moderate), but, by applying of weathering Steel, no maintenance work is required (Good)・ Due to all fabricate in Factory, easy for erection at site (Good)

3.4 Comparison of Bridge Type

Plan – 4Steel I Girder with Steel Deck Plate

Plan ‐ 5 Pony Truss

Side View & Cross Section

Cost(Super

Structure)1.22 1.00

Comment

・ Step Construction is possible. (Good)・ Re‐coating is necessary for Main Girder and lower face of deck slab. (Moderate), but, by applying of weathering Steel, no maintenance work is required (Good)・ Due to all fabricate in Factory, easy for erection at site (Good)

・ Step Construction is impossible. (Bad)・ Re‐coating is necessary for Truss structure. (Moderate) , but, by applying of weathering Steel, no maintenance work is required (Good)・ Due to large number of members, periodof work at site will be longer than other types. (Bad)

3.5 Recommendation

For Bridge Type

Due to an economic advantage and easy work at site is preferable for type A, because short construction period at site is required.

⇒ Plan‐3 (Composite Floor Slab) are preferable.

For Bridge Type

Due to an economic advantage and requirement of Step Construction for type B,

⇒ Plan‐3 (Composite Floor Slab) are preferable.

4.1 For Type1. Ferere ROB4. Delise ROB5. Tilak ROB

4. Case Study

Ferere ROB : Bridge General

4. Case Study

4.2 For Type B

2. Balasis ROB3. Mahalaxmi ROB6. Mahim ROB7. Goregaon ROB

Balasis ROB : Bridge General

Ⅲ. Results of Site Inspection

5. Summary of Study Result

Bridge Name

Proposed Plan

Length [m] Width [m]Span No.

Superstructure TypeConstruction Method

Cost Estimation(Approx.)

Road over Bridge (ROB)

1 Ferere ROB 36.00 19.50 1 Composite Floor SlabOne Time

ConstructionRs. 260 million

2 Balasis ROB 31.50 19.50 5 Composite Floor SlabStep

3 Mahalaxmi ROB 77.00 25.00 5 Composite Floor SlabStep

4 Delise ROB 100.20 24.80 1 Composite Floor SlabOne Time

5 Tilak ROB 236.00 20.00 3 Composite Floor SlabOne Time

ConstructionRs. 1,700 million

6 Mahim ROB 80.00 28.30 3 Composite Floor SlabStep

7 Goregaon ROB 79.00 27.50 2 Composite Floor SlabStep

Ⅳ. Study for Next Step

2. Non‐Destructive Survey

Target Bridges for Non‐Destructive Survey

Type of Bridge Location Bridge Name

ROB(Concrete)

Mumbai Mahim ROB (No.6)

VadodaraLC No. 5/A (No.8)

LC No.2/X (No.9)

Schmidt Hammer

Concrete Member

Electromagnetic Wave Radar

Ⅴ. Application of High‐Elasticity CFRP

Advantage ofHigh‐module CFRP

Can reducenumber of sheet

Recently, High‐module CFRP is used in JAPAN.

Elasticity

High‐module Type

Specification of Replakr

2 Num. (230 kN/mm2)

1 Num. (640 kN/mm2)

More Economical and Easy for installation.

Ⅵ. Schedule

1. Major Work Items and Schedule

Deliverables Submission Date

Inception Report April, 2016

Interim Report July, 2016

Draft Final Report Beginning of October, 2016

Final Report End of November, 2016

THANK YOU

Oriental Consultants Global Co., Ltd.

添付 6

西部鉄道における損傷橋梁調査シート

Date & Time: 07 Jun,2016 12:30Bridge No. Ser.No.1 Division MumbaiBridge Name Ferere ROB Year of Construction 1921GPS Data N 18 °57 ' 43" Grant Road Station

E 72°48 ' 55 " -

Bridge Length 25.36mBridge Width 19.50m

Overview of the Bridge Side View

Up View

Bridge Survey Record (1/6)

Span Arrangement Number 1

Type of Superstructur 2 Main Steel I-Girder with cross girders Type of Substructure Stone Masonry

Abutment

Station

Date & Time: 07 Jun,2016 12:30Bridge No. Ser.No.1 Grant Road StationBridge Name Ferere ROB -Photoes

Photo R1 Photo R2

Photo R5 Photo R8

Photo R10 Photo R

Station

Bridge Survey Record (2/6) Right Side

R8 R9R10

L4L5L6

Date & Time: 07 Jun,2016 12:30Bridge No. Ser.No.1 MumbaiBridge Name Ferere ROB 1921Photoes

Photo L5 Photo L7

Photo L8 Photo L

Photo L Photo L

Station

Bridge Survey Record (3/6) Left Side

R8 R9R10

L4L5L6

Date & Time: 07 Jun,2016 12:30Bridge No. DivisionBridge Name Year of ConstructionGPS Data N 18 °57 ' 43" Station

E 72°48 ' 55 "

General Description of Damages

(1) Concrete Member

- Girder

- Cross Beam

- Slab

(2) Steel Member - Girder - Virtical Girder (stringer) - Cross Beam - Sway Bracing

(4) Drainage Pipe

(5) Others

- Pier

- Abutment

- Wing Wall

- Approach Road Condition

- Obstruction - Scouring

Grant Road Station-

2. Substructure

Rusting (slightly)

No Check

N/ARusting (slightly)

4.Evaluation

Member Kind of the DamageEx. Concrete : Cracking, Spalling, etc. Steel : Cracking, Rusting, Fracture, etc.

1. Superstructure

(3) Bearing Shoe

Ser.No.1 MumbaiFerere ROB 1921

E 72°48 ' 55 "

Detailed Description of Damages

Mumbai

Kind of Damage

1921Grant Road Station

Good Condition

Object Member

Ser.No.1Ferere ROB

Sketch or Photo

Date & Time: 07 Jun,2016 12:30Bridge No. Location (State) Bridge Name Year of ConstructionGPS Data N 18 °57 ' 43" Grant Road Station

E 72°48 ' 55 " -

Evaluation index

1 Yes No

3 Yes No

4 Yes No

5 Much Less

6 Good Not Good

2 Application of Japanese advanced technology

7 Collecting information from japanese companies, and estimation of project effects

Station

Ferere ROB 1921

Ser.No.1 Mumbai

Collecting information from japanese companies, and estimation of project effects See below

Cosistency with the upper plan, verification og Indian Railway priority bridges

Application of Japanese advanced technology See below

Confirmation of other projects by Japanese ODA

Confirmation of other donor's projects and local project

Impact on the surrounding society and economy

Access to the bridge sites

Date & Time: 07 Jun,2016 12:00Bridge No. Ser.No.2 Division MumbaiBridge Name Belasis ROB Year of Construction 1893GPS Data N 18 °58 ' 08" Mumbai central

E 72°49 ' 06 " -

Up View

Type of Superstructur Steel I-Girder (15 girders) Type of Substructure

Stone Masonry Abutment

and Steel Pier Column

Station

Date & Time: 07 Jun,2016 12:00Bridge No. Ser.No.2 Mumbai centralBridge Name Belasis ROB -Photoes

Photo R1 Photo R2

Photo R4 Photo R5

Photo R8 Photo R9

Station

R8 R9R10

L4L5L6

Date & Time: 07 Jun,2016 12:00Bridge No. Ser.No.2 MumbaiBridge Name Belasis ROB 1893Photoes

Photo L2 Photo L5

Photo L6 Photo L8

Photo L Photo L

Station

R8 R9R10

L4L5L6

E 72°49 ' 06 "

(1) Concrete Member

- Girder

- Cross Beam

- Slab

(4) Drainage Pipe

(5) Others

- Pier

- Abutment

- Wing Wall

Ser.No.2 MumbaiBelasis ROB 1893

4.Evaluation

1. Superstructure

(3) Bearing Shoe

2. Substructure

3. Miscellaneous

Rusting (slightly)

No Check

N/ARusting (slightly)

Mumbai central-

E 72°49 ' 06 "

Sketch or Photo

Object Member Steel I-Girder

Ser.No.2Belasis ROB

Mumbai

Kind of Damage

1893Mumbai central

Rusting

Date & Time: 07 Jun,2016 12:00Bridge No. Location (State) Bridge Name Year of ConstructionGPS Data N 18 °58 ' 08" Mumbai central

E 72°49 ' 06 " -

Evaluation index

1 Yes No

3 Yes No

4 Yes No

5 Much Less

6 Good Not Good

Station

Belasis ROB 1893

Ser.No.2 Mumbai

Date & Time: 07 Jun,2016 12:00Bridge No. Ser.No.3 Division MumbaiBridge Name Mahalaxmi ROB Year of Construction 1920GPS Data N 18 °58 ' 56" Mahalaxmi

E 72°49 ' 27 " -

Up View

Type of Superstructur Steel I-Girder (15 girders) Type of Substructure

Station

Date & Time: 07 Jun,2016 12:00Bridge No. Ser.No.3 MahalaxmiBridge Name Mahalaxmi ROB -Photoes

Photo R2 Photo R3

Photo R5 Photo R6

Photo R7 Photo R10

Station

R8 R9R10

L4L5L6

Date & Time: 07 Jun,2016 12:00Bridge No. Ser.No.3 MumbaiBridge Name Mahalaxmi ROB 1920Photoes

Photo L5 Photo L6

Photo L Photo L

Station

R8 R9R10

L4L5L6

E 72°49 ' 27 "

(1) Concrete Member

- Girder

- Cross Beam

- Slab

(4) Drainage Pipe

(5) Others

- Pier

- Abutment

- Wing Wall

Ser.No.3 MumbaiMahalaxmi ROB 1920

4.Evaluation

1. Superstructure

(3) Bearing Shoe

2. Substructure

3. Miscellaneous

Rusting

No Check

N/ARusting

Mahalaxmi-

E 72°49 ' 27 "

Sketch or Photo

Object Member

Ser.No.3Mahalaxmi ROB

Mumbai

Kind of Damage

1920Mahalaxmi

Good Condition

Date & Time: 07 Jun,2016 12:00Bridge No. Location (State) Bridge Name Year of ConstructionGPS Data N 18 °58 ' 56" Mahalaxmi

E 72°49 ' 27 " -

Evaluation index

1 Yes No

3 Yes No

4 Yes No

5 Much Less

6 Good Not Good

Station

Mahalaxmi ROB 1920

Ser.No.3 Mumbai

Date & Time: 07 Jun,2016 11:00Bridge No. Ser.No.4 Division MumbaiBridge Name Delise ROB Year of Construction 1921GPS Data N 18 °59 ' 51" Lower Parel

E 72°49 ' 53 " -

Up View

Type of Superstructur 2 Main Steel I-Girder with cross girders Type of Substructure

Station

Date & Time: 07 Jun,2016 11:00Bridge No. Ser.No.4 Lower ParelBridge Name Delise ROB -Photoes

Photo R5 Photo R5

Photo R6 Photo R

Photo R Photo R

Station

R8 R9R10

L4L5L6

Date & Time: 07 Jun,2016 11:00Bridge No. Ser.No.4 MumbaiBridge Name Delise ROB 1921Photoes

Photo L2 Photo L3

Photo L5 Photo L6

Photo 8 Photo L10

Station

R8 R9R10

L4L5L6

E 72°49 ' 53 "

(1) Concrete Member

- Girder

- Cross Beam

- Slab

(4) Drainage Pipe

(5) Others

- Pier

- Abutment

- Wing Wall

Lower Parel-

2. Substructure

3. Miscellaneous

Rusting

Crecking and Spalling

No Check

N/ARusting

4.Evaluation

1. Superstructure

(3) Bearing Shoe

Stone Masonary

Ser.No.4 MumbaiDelise ROB 1921

E 72°49 ' 53 "

Mumbai

Kind of Damage

1921Lower Parel

Spalling and exposed Rebar

Object Member RC Slub

Ser.No.4Delise ROB

Sketch or Photo

E 72°49 ' 53 "

Sketch or Photo

Lower Parel-

Object Member Concrete Base

Kind of Damage Cracking and spalling

E 72°49 ' 53 "

Lower Parel-

Object Member Cross Bream

Kind of Damage Runsting

Sketch or Photo

Date & Time: 07 Jun,2016 11:00Bridge No. Location (State) Bridge Name Year of ConstructionGPS Data N 18 °59 ' 51" Lower Parel

E 72°49 ' 53 " -

Evaluation index

1 Yes No

3 Yes No

4 Yes No

5 Much Less

6 Good Not Good

Station

Delise ROB 1921

Ser.No.4 Mumbai

Date & Time: 08 Jun,2016 10:30Bridge No. Ser.No.5 Division MumbaiBridge Name Tilak ROB Year of Construction 1925GPS Data N 19 °01 ' 13" Dadar

E 72°50 ' 38 " -

Up View

Type of Superstructur 2 Main Steel I-Girder with cross girders Type of Substructure

Station

Date & Time: 08 Jun,2016 10:30Bridge No. Ser.No.5 DadarBridge Name Tilak ROB -Photoes

Photo R2 Photo R6

Photo R4 Photo R7

Photo R8 Photo R9

Station

R8 R9R10

L4L5L6

Date & Time: 08 Jun,2016 10:30Bridge No. Ser.No.5 MumbaiBridge Name Tilak ROB 1925Photoes

Photo L3 Photo L6

Photo L8 Photo L9

Photo L Photo L

Station

R8 R9R10

L4L5L6

E 72°50 ' 38 "

(1) Concrete Member

- Girder

- Cross Beam

- Slab

(4) Drainage Pipe

(5) Others

- Pier

- Abutment

- Wing Wall

Dadar-

2. Substructure

3. Miscellaneous

No check

4.Evaluation

1. Superstructure

(3) Bearing Shoe

Ser.No.5 MumbaiTilak ROB 1925

E 72°50 ' 38 "

Mumbai

Kind of Damage

1925Dadar

Good Condition

Object Member

Ser.No.5Tilak ROB

Sketch or Photo

Date & Time: 08 Jun,2016 10:30Bridge No. Location (State) Bridge Name Year of ConstructionGPS Data N 19 °01 ' 13" Dadar

E 72°50 ' 38 " -

Evaluation index

1 Yes No

3 Yes No

4 Yes No

5 Much Less

6 Good Not Good

Station

Tilak ROB 1925

Ser.No.5 Mumbai

Date & Time: 08 Jun,2016 11:40Bridge No. Ser.No.6 Division MumbaiBridge Name Mahim ROB Year of Construction 1993GPS Data N 19 °02 ' 41" Mahim Junction

E 72°50 ' 41 " -

Up View

Type of Superstructur PC I-Shaped Girder Type of Substructure RC Abutment and RCPier Column

Station

Date & Time: 08 Jun,2016 11:40Bridge No. Ser.No.6 Mahim JunctionBridge Name Mahim ROB -Photoes

Photo R3 Photo R6

Photo R4 Photo R7

Photo R8 Photo R10

Station

R8 R9R1

L4L5L6

Date & Time: 08 Jun,2016 11:40Bridge No. Ser.No.6 MumbaiBridge Name Mahim ROB 1993Photoes

Photo L3 Photo L5

Photo L7 Photo L9

Photo L Photo L

Station

R8 R9R1

L4L5L6

E 72°50 ' 41 "

(1) Concrete Member

- Girder

- Cross Beam

- Slab

(4) Drainage Pipe

(5) Others

- Pier

- Abutment

- Wing Wall

Ser.No.6 MumbaiMahim ROB 1993

4.Evaluation

1. Superstructure

(3) Bearing Shoe

Cracking and Spalling

Spalling

2. Substructure

3. Miscellaneous

Spalling

No Check

Mahim Junction-

E 72°50 ' 41 "

Sketch or Photo

Object Member PC I-Girder and RC slub

Ser.No.6Mahim ROB

Mumbai

Kind of Damage

1993Mahim Junction

Spalling

E 72°50 ' 41 "

Sketch or Photo

Mahim Junction-

Object Member PC cable

Kind of Damage Fracture

E 72°50 ' 41 "

Sketch or Photo

Mahim Junction-

Object Member RC Pier

Kind of Damage Cracking and Spalling

Date & Time: 08 Jun,2016 11:40Bridge No. Location (State) Bridge Name Year of ConstructionGPS Data N 19 °02 ' 41" Mahim Junction

E 72°50 ' 41 " -

Evaluation index

1 Yes No

3 Yes No

4 Yes No

5 Much Less

6 Good Not Good

Station

Mahim ROB 1993

Ser.No.6 Mumbai

Date & Time: 08 Jun,2016 15:10Bridge No. Ser.No.7 Division MumbaiBridge Name Goregaon ROB Year of Construction 1993GPS Data N 19 °10 ' 26" Goregaon

E 72° 50 ' 56 " Malad

Up View

Type of Superstructur PC I-Shaped Girder Type of Substructure RC Abutment and RCPier Column

Station

Date & Time: 08 Jun,2016 15:10Bridge No. Ser.No.7 GoregaonBridge Name Goregaon ROB Malad Photoes

Photo R1 Photo R6

Photo R8 Photo R9

Photo R Photo R

Station

R8 R9R10

L4L5L6

Date & Time: 08 Jun,2016 15:10Bridge No. Ser.No.7 MumbaiBridge Name Goregaon ROB 1993Photoes

Photo L5 Photo L7

Photo L8 Photo L

Photo L Photo L

Station

R8 R9R10

L4L5L6

E 72° 50 ' 56 "

(1) Concrete Member

- Girder

- Cross Beam

- Slab

(4) Drainage Pipe

(5) Others

- Pier

- Abutment

- Wing Wall

GoregaonMalad

2. Substructure

3. Miscellaneous

No Check

4.Evaluation

1. Superstructure

(3) Bearing Shoe

Ser.No.7 MumbaiGoregaon ROB 1993

E 72° 50 ' 56 "

Mumbai

Kind of Damage

1993Goregaon

Good Condition

Object Member

Ser.No.7Goregaon ROB

Sketch or Photo

Date & Time: 08 Jun,2016 15:10Bridge No. Location (State) Bridge Name Year of ConstructionGPS Data N 19 °10 ' 26" Goregaon

E 72° 50 ' 56 " Malad

Evaluation index

1 Yes No

3 Yes No

4 Yes No

5 Much Less

6 Good Not Good

Station

Goregaon ROB 1993

Ser.No.7 Mumbai

Date & Time: 13 Jun,2016 12:30Bridge No. Ser.No.8 Division VadodaraBridge Name LC No.5/A Year of Construction 2011-2012GPS Data N 21 °42 ' 20" Bharuch

E 72° 57 ' 59 " Sami

Up View

Type of Superstructur PSC Box Type Type of Substructure RC Abutment and RCPier Column

Station

Date & Time: 13 Jun,2016 12:30Bridge No. Ser.No.8 BharuchBridge Name LC No.5/A SamiPhotoes

Photo R3 Photo R6

Photo R Photo R

Station

R8 R9R10

L4L5L6

Date & Time: 13 Jun,2016 12:30Bridge No. Ser.No.8 VadodaraBridge Name LC No.5/A 2011-2012Photoes

Photo L2 Photo L3

Photo L4 Photo L5

Photo L8 Photo L10

Station

R8 R9R10

L4L5L6

E 72° 57 ' 59 "

(1) Concrete Member

- Girder

- Cross Beam

- Slab

(4) Drainage Pipe

(5) Others

- Pier

- Abutment

- Wing Wall

BharuchSami

2. Substructure

3. Miscellaneous

Cracking

No Check

4.Evaluation

1. Superstructure

(3) Bearing Shoe

Ser.No.8 VadodaraLC No.5/A 2011-2012

E 72° 57 ' 59 "

Vadodara

Kind of Damage

2011-2012Bharuch

Cracking

Object Member PSC Box

Ser.No.8LC No.5/A

Sketch or Photo

Date & Time: 13 Jun,2016 12:30Bridge No. Location (State) Bridge Name Year of ConstructionGPS Data N 21 °42 ' 20" Bharuch

E 72° 57 ' 59 " Sami

Evaluation index

1 Yes No

3 Yes No

4 Yes No

5 Much Less

6 Good Not Good

Station

LC No.5/A 2011-2012

Ser.No.8 Vadodara

Date & Time: 13 Jun,2016 09:30Bridge No. Ser.No.9 Division VadodaraBridge Name LC No.2/X (North) Year of Construction 2008GPS Data N 22 °03 ' 22" Miyagam

E 73° 07 ' 46 " Daboi-Malsar

Up View

Station

Date & Time: 13 Jun,2016 09:30Bridge No. Ser.No.9 MiyagamBridge Name LC No.2/X (North) Daboi-MalsarPhotoes

Photo R2 Photo R3

Photo R5 Photo R6

Photo R8 Photo R

Station

R8 R9R10

L4L5L6

Date & Time: 13 Jun,2016 09:30Bridge No. Ser.No.9 VadodaraBridge Name LC No.2/X (North) 2008Photoes

Photo L2 Photo L3

Photo L5 Photo L6

Photo L8 Photo L10

Station

R8 R9R10

L4L5L6

E 73° 07 ' 46 "

(1) Concrete Member

- Girder

- Cross Beam

- Slab

(4) Drainage Pipe

(5) Others

- Pier

- Abutment

- Wing Wall

Ser.No.9 VadodaraLC No.2/X (North) 2008

4.Evaluation

1. Superstructure

(3) Bearing Shoe

No Check

2. Substructure

3. Miscellaneous

Repair for Cracking

No Check

MiyagamDaboi-Malsar

E 73° 07 ' 46 "

Sketch or Photo

Object Member Deck Slab

Ser.No.9LC No.2/X (North)

Vadodara

Kind of Damage

2008Miyagam

Daboi-Malsar

Repair Work for Cracking

Date & Time: 13 Jun,2016 09:30Bridge No. Location (State) Bridge Name Year of ConstructionGPS Data N 22 °03 ' 22" Miyagam

Evaluation index

1 Yes No

3 Yes No

4 Yes No

5 Much Less

6 Good Not Good

Station

LC No.2/X (North) 2008

Ser.No.9 Vadodara

Date & Time: 13 Jun,2016 09:30Bridge No. Ser.No.9 Division VadodaraBridge Name LC No.2/X (South) Year of Construction 2008GPS Data N 22 °02 ' 14" Miyagam

Up View

Station

Date & Time: 13 Jun,2016 09:30Bridge No. Ser.No.9 MiyagamBridge Name LC No.2/X (South) Daboi-MalsarPhotoes

Photo R2 Photo R5

Photo R6 Photo R8

Photo R10 Photo R

Station

R8 R9R10

L4L5L6

Date & Time: 13 Jun,2016 09:30Bridge No. Ser.No.9 VadodaraBridge Name LC No.2/X (South) 2008Photoes

Photo L1 Photo L2

Photo L5 Photo L6

Photo L8 Photo L10

Station

R8 R9R10

L4L5L6

E 73° 07 ' 24 "

(1) Concrete Member

- Girder

- Cross Beam

- Slab

(4) Drainage Pipe

(5) Others

- Pier

- Abutment

- Wing Wall

MiyagamDaboi-Malsar

2. Substructure

3. Miscellaneous

Cracking

No Check

4.Evaluation

1. Superstructure

(3) Bearing Shoe

No Check

Ser.No.9 VadodaraLC No.2/X (South) 2008

E 73° 07 ' 24 "

Vadodara

Kind of Damage

2008Miyagam

Daboi-Malsar

Cracking

Object Member Deck Slab

Ser.No.9LC No.2/X (South)

Sketch or Photo

Date & Time: 13 Jun,2016 09:30Bridge No. Location (State) Bridge Name Year of ConstructionGPS Data N 22 °02 ' 14" Miyagam

Evaluation index

1 Yes No

3 Yes No

4 Yes No

5 Much Less

6 Good Not Good

Station

LC No.2/X (South) 2008

Ser.No.9 Vadodara

Date & Time: 09 Jun,2016 11:00Bridge No. 73 Division MumbaiBridge Name - Year of Construction 1993GPS Data N 19 °19 ' 20" Bhayandar

E 72°59 ' 08 " Naigaon

Bridge Length 1450mBridge Width 6.7 m

Up View

Type of Superstructur PC Box Girder Type of Substructure RC Abutment and RCPier Column

Station

Date & Time: 09 Jun,2016 11:00Bridge No. 73 BhayandarBridge Name - NaigaonPhotoes

Photo R Photo R

Station

R8 R9R10

L4L5L6

Date & Time: 09 Jun,2016 11:00Bridge No. 73 MumbaiBridge Name - 1993Photoes

Photo L3 Photo L5

Photo L9 Photo L6

Photo L7 Photo L

Station

R8 R9R10

L4L5L6

E 72°59 ' 08 "

(1) Concrete Member

- Girder

- Cross Beam

- Slab

(4) Drainage Pipe

(5) Others

- Pier

- Abutment

- Wing Wall

73 Mumbai- 1993

4.Evaluation

1. Superstructure

(3) Bearing Shoe

No Check

Cracking

2. Substructure

3. Miscellaneous

No Check

BhayandarNaigaon

E 72°59 ' 08 "

Sketch or Photo

Object Member PSC Box Girder

Mumbai

Kind of Damage

1993BhayandarNaigaon

Horizontal and Inclined Cracks in Web

Date & Time: 09 Jun,2016 11:00Bridge No. Location (State) Bridge Name Year of ConstructionGPS Data N 19 °19 ' 20" Bhayandar

E 72°59 ' 08 " Naigaon

Evaluation index

1 Yes No

3 Yes No

4 Yes No

5 Much Less

6 Good Not Good

Station

- 1993

73 Mumbai

Date & Time: 09 Jun,2016Bridge No. 75 Division MumbaiBridge Name - Year of Construction 1993GPS Data N 19 °20 ' 24" Station Bhayandar

E 72°51 ' 01 " Natgaon

Bridge Length 550m Span Arrangement Number 11Bridge Width - m

Up View

Type of Superstructure PC Box Girder Type of Substructure RC Abutment and RCPier Column

Date & Time: 09 Jun,2016Bridge No. 75 BhayandarBridge Name - NatgaonPhotoes

Photo R2 Photo R3

Photo R5 Photo R

Photo R Photo R

Station

R8 R9R10

L4L5L6

Date & Time: 09 Jun,2016Bridge No. 75 MumbaiBridge Name - 1993Photoes

Photo L2 Photo L5

Photo L6 Photo L8

Photo L Photo L

Station

R8 R9R10

L4L5L6

Date & Time: 09 Jun,2016Bridge No. DivisionBridge Name Year of ConstructionGPS Data N 19 °20 ' 24" Station

E 72°51 ' 01 "

(1) Concrete Member

- Girder

- Cross Beam

- Slab

(4) Drainage Pipe

(5) Others

- Pier

- Abutment

- Wing Wall

75 Mumbai- 1993

4.Evaluation

1. Superstructure

(3) Bearing Shoe

2. Substructure

3. Miscellaneous

BhayandarNatgaon

E 72°51 ' 01 "

Sketch or Photo

Object Member

Mumbai

Kind of Damage

1993BhayandarNatgaon

Date & Time: 09 Jun,2016Bridge No. Location (State) Bridge Name Year of ConstructionGPS Data N 19 °20 ' 24" Bhayandar

E 72°51 ' 01 " Natgaon

Evaluation index

1 Yes No

3 Yes No

4 Yes No

5 Much Less

6 Good Not Good

Station

- 1993

75 Mumbai

Date & Time: 09 Jun,2016 13:30Bridge No. 92 Division MumbaiBridge Name - Year of Construction 1963GPS Data N 19 °31 ' 28" Vaitama

E 72°51 ' 02 " Saphale

Bridge Length 380mBridge Width -m

Up View

Type of Superstructur Type: Steel I-Girder Type of Substructure AbutmentRC Abutmentand RC Pier Column

Station

Date & Time: 09 Jun,2016 13:30Bridge No. 92 VaitamaBridge Name - SaphalePhotoes

Photo R2 Photo R3

Photo R5 Photo R

Photo R Photo R

Station

R8 R9R10

L4L5L6

Date & Time: 09 Jun,2016 13:30Bridge No. 92 MumbaiBridge Name - 1963Photoes

Photo L2 Photo L5

Photo L6 Photo L8

Photo L Photo L

Station

R8 R9R10

L4L5L6

E 72°51 ' 02 "

(1) Concrete Member

- Girder

- Cross Beam

- Slab

(4) Drainage Pipe

(5) Others

- Pier

- Abutment

- Wing Wall

VaitamaSaphale

2. Substructure

3. Miscellaneous

No Check

N/AN/AN/A

4.Evaluation

1. Superstructure

(3) Bearing Shoe

Good Condition

Cracking

No Check-

92 Mumbai- 1963

E 72°51 ' 02 "

Mumbai

Kind of Damage

1963VaitamaSaphale

Cracking

Object Member Pier

Sketch or Photo

Date & Time: 09 Jun,2016 13:30Bridge No. Location (State) Bridge Name Year of ConstructionGPS Data N 19 °31 ' 28" Vaitama

E 72°51 ' 02 " Saphale

Evaluation index

1 Yes No

3 Yes No

4 Yes No

5 Much Less

6 Good Not Good

Station

- 1963

92 Mumbai

Date & Time: 09 Jun,2016Bridge No. 93 Division MumbaiBridge Name - Year of Construction 1963GPS Data N 19 °32 ' 20" Station Vaitama

E 72°51 ' 05 " Saphale

Bridge Length 410 m Span Arrangement Number 22Bridge Width -m

Up View

Type of Superstructure Type: Steel I-Girder Type of Substructure AbutmentRC Abutmentand RC Pier Column

Date & Time: 09 Jun,2016Bridge No. 93 VaitamaBridge Name - SaphalePhotoes

Photo R1 Photo R2

Photo R5 Photo R8

Photo R10 Photo R

Station

R8 R9R1

L4L5L6

Date & Time: 09 Jun,2016Bridge No. 93 MumbaiBridge Name - 1963Photoes

Photo L5 Photo L7

Photo L8 Photo L

Photo L Photo L

Station

R8 R9R1

L4L5L6

E 72°51 ' 05 "

(1) Concrete Member

- Girder

- Cross Beam

- Slab

(4) Drainage Pipe

(5) Others

- Pier

- Abutment

- Wing Wall

VaitamaSaphale

2. Substructure

3. Miscellaneous

4.Evaluation

1. Superstructure

(3) Bearing Shoe

93 Mumbai- 1963

E 72°51 ' 05 "

Mumbai

Kind of Damage

1963VaitamaSaphale

Object Member

Sketch or Photo

Date & Time: 09 Jun,2016Bridge No. Location (State) Bridge Name Year of ConstructionGPS Data N 19 °32 ' 20" Vaitama

E 72°51 ' 05 " Saphale

Evaluation index

1 Yes No

3 Yes No

4 Yes No

5 Much Less

6 Good Not Good

Station

- 1963

93 Mumbai

Date & Time: 14 Jun,2016 12:20Bridge No. 114 Division RatlamBridge Name - Year of Construction 1958-60GPS Data N 22 °50 ' 46" 06 Dahod

E 74°17 ' 30 " Dhamarda

Up View

Type of Superstructur PSC I-Girder Type of Substructure Stone Masonry Abutment

Station

Date & Time: 14 Jun,2016 12:20Bridge No. 114 DahodBridge Name - DhamardaPhotoes

Photo R Photo R

Photo R10 Photo R

Station

R8 R9R10

L4L5L6

Date & Time: 14 Jun,2016 12:20Bridge No. 114 RatlamBridge Name - 1958-60Photoes

Photo L1 Photo L2

Photo L5 Photo L6

Photo L8 Photo L

Station

R8 R9R10

L4L5L6

Date & Time: 14 Jun,2016 12:20Bridge No. DivisionBridge Name Year of ConstructionGPS Data N 22 °50 ' 46" 06 Station

E 74°17 ' 30 "

(1) Concrete Member

- Girder

- Cross Beam

- Slab

(4) Drainage Pipe

(5) Others

- Pier

- Abutment

- Wing Wall

DahodDhamarda

2. Substructure

3. Miscellaneous

No Check

4.Evaluation

1. Superstructure

(3) Bearing Shoe

No Check

114 Ratlam- 1958-60

Date & Time: 14 Jun,2016 12:20Bridge No. DivisionBridge Name Year of ConstructionGPS Data N 22 °50 ' 46" 06 Station

E 74°17 ' 30 "

Ratlam

Kind of Damage

1958-60Dahod

Dhamarda

After Repairing CFRP, Now in Good Condition

Object Member Prestressed I-Girder

Sketch or Photo

Date & Time: 14 Jun,2016 12:20Bridge No. Location (State) Bridge Name Year of ConstructionGPS Data N 22 °50 ' 46" 06 Dahod

E 74°17 ' 30 " Dhamarda

Evaluation index

1 Yes No

3 Yes No

4 Yes No

5 Much Less

6 Good Not Good

Station

- 1958-60

114 Ratlam

Date & Time: 14 Jun,2016 11:40Bridge No. 129 Division RatlamBridge Name - Year of Construction 1958-60GPS Data N 22 °51 ' 54" Station Bordi

E 74°22 ' 32 " Anas

Bridge Length 60.00m Span Arrangement Number 3Bridge Width 4.30m

Up View

Type of Superstructure PSC I-Girder Type of Substructure Stone Masonry Abutment

Date & Time: 14 Jun,2016 11:40Bridge No. 129 BordiBridge Name - AnasPhotoes

Photo R Photo R

Station

R8 R9R1

L4L5L6

Photo L1 Photo L2

Photo L3 Photo L7

Photo L8 Photo L9

Station

R8 R9R1

L4L5L6

E 74°22 ' 32 "

(1) Concrete Member

- Girder

- Cross Beam

- Slab

(4) Drainage Pipe

(5) Others

- Pier

- Abutment

- Wing Wall

BordiAnas

2. Substructure

3. Miscellaneous

No Check

4.Evaluation

1. Superstructure

(3) Bearing Shoe

129 Ratlam- 1958-60

E 74°22 ' 32 "

Ratlam

Kind of Damage

1958-60BordiAnas

Object Member Prestressed I-Girders

Sketch or Photo

Date & Time: 14 Jun,2016 11:40Bridge No. Location (State) Bridge Name Year of ConstructionGPS Data N 22 °51 ' 54" Bordi

E 74°22 ' 32 " Anas

Evaluation index

1 Yes No

3 Yes No

4 Yes No

5 Much Less

6 Good Not Good

Station

- 1958-60

129 Ratlam

A6-100

Date & Time: 14 Jun,2016 10:40Bridge No. 132 Division RatlamBridge Name - Year of Construction 1958-60GPS Data N 22 °52 ' 06" Station Bordi

E 74°23 ' 35 " Anas

Up View

A6-101

Date & Time: 14 Jun,2016 10:40Bridge No. 132 BordiBridge Name - AnasPhotoes

Photo R1 Photo R2

Photo R3 Photo R5

Photo R8 Photo R10

Station

R8 R9R10

L4L5L6

A6-102

Photo L2 Photo L6

Photo L6 Photo L8

Photo L10 Photo L

Station

R8 R9R10

L4L5L6

A6-103

E 74°23 ' 35 "

(1) Concrete Member

- Girder

- Cross Beam

- Slab

(4) Drainage Pipe

(5) Others

- Pier

- Abutment

- Wing Wall

132 Ratlam- 1958-60

4.Evaluation

1. Superstructure

(3) Bearing Shoe

2. Substructure

3. Miscellaneous

No Check

BordiAnas

A6-104

E 74°23 ' 35 "

Sketch or Photo

Ratlam

Kind of Damage

1958-60BordiAnas

A6-105

Date & Time: 14 Jun,2016 10:40Bridge No. Location (State) Bridge Name Year of ConstructionGPS Data N 22 °52 ' 06" Bordi

E 74°23 ' 35 " Anas

Evaluation index

1 Yes No

3 Yes No

4 Yes No

5 Much Less

6 Good Not Good

Station

- 1958-60

132 Ratlam

A6-106

Date & Time: 15 Jun,2016 10:40Bridge No. R5 Division RatlamBridge Name - Year of Construction 1958-60GPS Data N 22 °49 ' 18" Limkheda

E 74°02 ' 38 " Mangal Mahudi

Up View

Type of Superstructur PSC I-Girder Type of Substructure Stone Masonry Abutment

Station

A6-107

Date & Time: 15 Jun,2016 10:40Bridge No. R5 LimkhedaBridge Name - Mangal MahudiPhotoes

Photo R2 Photo R5

Photo R6 Photo R7

Photo R10 Photo R

Station

R8 R9R10

L4L5L6

A6-108

Date & Time: 15 Jun,2016 10:40Bridge No. R5 RatlamBridge Name - 1958-60Photoes

Photo L1 Photo L2

Photo L6 Photo L7

Photo L8 Photo L10

Station

R8 R9R10

L4L5L6

A6-109

E 74°02 ' 38 "

(1) Concrete Member

- Girder

- Cross Beam

- Slab

(4) Drainage Pipe

(5) Others

- Pier

- Abutment

- Wing Wall

R5 Ratlam- 1958-60

4.Evaluation

1. Superstructure

(3) Bearing Shoe

Cracking

2. Substructure

3. Miscellaneous

Cracking , Reinforcement Bar Exposed

No Check

LimkhedaMangal Mahudi

A6-110

E 74°02 ' 38 "

Sketch or Photo

Ratlam

Kind of Damage

1958-60Limkheda

Mangal Mahudi

Cracking

A6-111

Date & Time: 15 Jun,2016 10:40Bridge No. Location (State) Bridge Name Year of ConstructionGPS Data N 22 °49 ' 18" Limkheda

Evaluation index

1 Yes No

3 Yes No

4 Yes No

5 Much Less

6 Good Not Good

Station

- 1958-60

R5 Ratlam

A6-112

Date & Time: 15 Jun,2016 11:40Bridge No. R8 Division RatlamBridge Name - Year of Construction 1958-60GPS Data N 22 °49 ' 40" Station Limkheda

Up View

A6-113

Date & Time: 15 Jun,2016 11:40Bridge No. R8 LimkhedaBridge Name - Mangal MahudiPhotoes

Photo R1 Photo R2

Photo R5 Photo R6

Photo R8 Photo R10

Station

R8 R9R1

L4L5L6

A6-114

Date & Time: 15 Jun,2016 11:40Bridge No. R8 RatlamBridge Name - 1958-60Photoes

Photo L1 Photo L2

Photo L5 Photo L6

Photo L8 Photo L9

Station

R8 R9R1

L4L5L6

A6-115

E 74°03 ' 20 "

(1) Concrete Member

- Girder

- Cross Beam

- Slab

(4) Drainage Pipe

(5) Others

- Pier

- Abutment

- Wing Wall

R8 Ratlam- 1958-60

4.Evaluation

1. Superstructure

(3) Bearing Shoe

Cracking

2. Substructure

3. Miscellaneous

Cracking , Reinforcement Bar Exposed

No Check

LimkhedaMangal Mahudi

A6-116

E 74°03 ' 20 "

Sketch or Photo

Ratlam

Kind of Damage

1958-60Limkheda

Mangal Mahudi

Cracking

A6-117

Date & Time: 15 Jun,2016 11:40Bridge No. Location (State) Bridge Name Year of ConstructionGPS Data N 22 °49 ' 40" Limkheda

Evaluation index

1 Yes No

3 Yes No

4 Yes No

5 Much Less

6 Good Not Good

Cosistency with the upper plan, verification of Indian Railway priority bridges

Station

- 1958-60

R8 Ratlam

A6-118

添付 5 ムンバイ市跨線橋架替えプロジェクト説明資...

Documents

ed spec slide presentation draft 4 - 2020 09 08 -...

跨越百年的美丽

20160525 跨界新識力沙龍論壇...

第二章田徑（一）跨欄

跨境电商服务平台让跨境电商更便捷 s...

跨國辯論社 international debate club

第九章跨文化管理

“ 跨境通途” —— 中国建设银行...

跨域學習跨校輔系跨國交流 -...

インド国...

u.s. used equipment value report - bus.umich.edu · table...

new offshore wind tenders in denmark 1,450 mw before 2020

ergebnisdienst hbsv hessenliga in : bensheim - auerbach...

23 26 ccss l06 660247 - glencoe20. a movie theater is...

自動締付扉蒸気滅菌器rg-150fn 660 1,550 1,450 1.508...

八. com 跨进程特性

跨科際特刊 no14

跨國16天－ reduced

02 kssr_跨课程元素

hd1500-7 for barrick - direct mining services€¦ ·...