airport noise plan - lincoln, nebraska suggested run-up ramp layout ..... after page 6-4 6c...

AIRPORT

Noise Compatibility Program

F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study

LINCOLN AIRP ORT

F.A.R. Part 150Noise Compat ib ili ty Study

NOISE COMP ATIBILITY P ROGRAM

P re p a r e d F o r

The Lin co ln Airport Au th ori ty

B y

Co ffm a n As s o c ia t e s , In c .

S e p te m be r 2003

The preparation of th is docum ent was financed in part through a plann ing grant fromthe Federal Aviation Ad m inistration (FAA) as approved u nd er th e Airport and AirwayImprovem ent Act of 1982, as am ended. The conten ts of th is report do not necessarilyreflect th e official views or policy of the FAA . Acceptance of th is report by the FAA doesnot in any way constitute a com m itm ent on th e part of the Un ited S tates to participatein any developm ent d epicted th erein , nor does it ind icate that the proposed developmentis environm entally acceptable in accordance with applicable public laws.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LINCOLN AIRP ORTLincoln , Nebraska

F.A.R. Part 150Noise Compat ib ili ty P rogram

N OIS E COMP ATIB ILITY P ROGRAMSponsor’s Cer t ifica t ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x

Ch a pte r F ou r

NOISE ABATEMENT ALTERNATIVES

POTENTIAL NOISE ABATEMENT MEASURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-3Runway Use And F light Routes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-3Airport Facilit ies Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-6Aircra ft Opera t iona l Pr ocedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-10Air por t Regu la t ions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-15

SELECTION OF MEASURE S F OR DETAILED E VALUATION . . . . . . 4-27Evalua t ion Cr iter ia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-27Alterna t ive 1 - Test The Effectiven ess Of Ut ilizing Runway 17R-35L For Nigh t t ime Opera t ions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-28Alt erna t ive 2 - Engine Run-Up Loca t ion Noise Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-31Alt erna t ive 3 - Engine Run-Up Enclosure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-33

SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-34

Ch a p te r F iv e

LAN D U S E ALTERN ATIVE S

LAND USE ISSUES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1LAND USE COMPATIBILITY BOUNDARY ESTABLISHMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-2

Boundar ies Established Ut ilizing Aircra ft Opera t ions . . . . . . . . . . 5-2Boundar ies Established By N oise Exposure Contours . . . . . . . . . . . 5-3Exist ing La nd Use P lanning Bounda r ies Wit h in Lincoln Air por t Environs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-5

LAND USE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-7Policy Techn iques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-8Regula tory Techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-9Expenditu re Techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-21

PRELIMINARY LAND USE ALTERNATIVES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-28

Cha pte r Six

N OIS E COMP ATIB ILITY P LAN

NOISE ABATEMENT AND LAND USE MEASURES ELIMINATED FROM CONSIDERATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-2NOISE ABATEMENT ELEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-2LAND USE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-6PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ELEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-14RESIDU AL NOISE IMPACTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-18SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-18

EXHIBITS

4A POSSIBLE NOISE ABATEMENT TECHNIQUES . . . . a fter pa ge 4-44B ALTERNATIVE RUN-UP LOCATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . a fter pa ge 4-104C TYPICAL AIRLINE DISTANCE N OISE

ABATEMENT DEPARTURE PROCEDURE . . . . . . . a fter pa ge 4-124D NBAA NOISE ABATEMENT DEPARTURE

PROCEDURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a fter pa ge 4-124E ALTERNATIVE 1 - TEST THE EF FE CTIVEN ESS

OF UTILIZING RUN WAY 17R-35L FOR NIGHTTIME OPERATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a fter pa ge 4-28

4F ALTERNATIVE 2 - POTENTIAL RUN-UP ENCLOSURE SITE S EXISTING AND A . . . . . . . . . . a fter pa ge 4-32

E XH IB ITS (Co n t in u e d )

4G ALTERNATIVE 3 - POTENTIAL RUN-UP ENCLOSURE SITE S B, C, AND D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a fter pa ge 4-32

4H ALTERNATIVE RUN-UP RAMP LAYOUT . . . . . . . . . a fter pa ge 4-324J POTENTIAL RUN -UP ENCLOSURE DESIGN . . . . . . a fter pa ge 4-34

5A LAND USE PLANNING ISSUES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a fter pa ge 5-25B ALTERNATIVE ENVIRONS NOISE DISTRICT

BOUNDARIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a fter pa ge 5-65C LAND U SE TECHN IQUES TO P ROMOTE

NOISE COMPATIBILITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a fter pa ge 5-85D COMPATIBLE LAND USE AND

COMPATIBLE ZONING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a fter pa ge 5-105E POTENTIAL REVISION S TO AIRPORT

ENVIRONS NOISE DISTRICT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a fter pa ge 5-165F ALTERNATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL

ZONING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a fter pa ge 5-205G NOISE-SENSITIVE LAND USE WITHIN

THE 65 DNL NOISE CONTOUR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a fter pa ge 5-24

6A RUN-UP LOCATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a fter pa ge 6-46B SUGGESTED RUN-UP RAMP LAYOUT . . . . . . . . . . . . a fter pa ge 6-46C RECOMMENDED AIRPORT ENVIRONS

NOISE DISTRICT BOUNDARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a fter pa ge 6-86D RECOMMENDED REVISED AIRPORT ENVIRONS

NOISE DISTRICT BOUNDARIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a fter pa ge 6-126E 2002 NOISE EXPOSURE CONTOUR

WITH LAND USE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a fter pa ge 6-186F 2007 NOISE EXPOSURE CONTOUR

WITH LAND USE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a fter pa ge 6-186G 2022 NOISE EXPOSURE CONTOUR

WITH LAND USE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a fter pa ge 6-18

Ap p e n d i x A

WELCOME TO THE P LANN ING

ADVIS ORY COMMITTEE

Ap p e n d i x B

COORD INATION , CON S U LTATION ,

AND P U B LIC IN VOLVEME N T

Ap p e n d i x D

IMP LEME N TATION MATER IALS

Ap p e n d i x E

S U P P OR T D OCU ME N TATION F OR LAN D U S E

RE GULATION S WITHIN AN D B ELOW 65 DN L

TE CH N ICAL IN F OR MATION P AP ERS

GLOSSARY OF NOISE COMPATIBILITY TERMSNOISE AND LAND USE COMPATIBILITY GUIDELINES

NOISE COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM

i

F.A.R. P a r t 150

NOISE COMP ATIBILITY N oi se Com p a t i b i li t y S t u d y Up d a t e

P ROGRAM Li n col n Ai r p or t

Th is is t he Noise Compa t ibilit yProgram (NCP) docum ent prepa red forLincoln Air por t . The NCP is the secondof two par t s required in a Federa lAvia t ion Regu la t ion (F .A.R.) Pa r t 150Noise Compa t ibility St udy. It includesChapters Four , Five, a nd Six inaddit ion to four appendices. The firstvolum e, th e Noise Exposur e Maps,wh ich includes the first Three chaptersof the study, was su bmitt ed to the FAAin F ebruary 2003.

Chapter Four of th e NCP, NoiseAbatement Altern at ives, d iscusses andana lyzes poten t ia l meth ods of reducingor sh ift ing a ircra ft noise away fr omnoise sensitive ar eas.

Chapter Five, Lan d Use Altern at ives,ana lyzes poten t ia l land u se p lanningand zoning t echniques to prevent the

development of new n oise-sen sit ive landuses in a reas exposed t o a ircra ft noise.

Chapt er Six presen t s t he NoiseCompat ibility Program. The pr ogram isorgan ized in to thr ee elemen ts: noiseaba tement , land use management , andprogram management . The fir st twoelements ar e based on t he findings ofChapters Four and F ive. The progra mm a n a ge m e n t e l e m e n t i n clu d e smeasu res to adm in ister , refine, a ndupda te the overa ll program as needed inthe fu ture.

Supplemen ta l in format ion is providedin the a ppendices a nd Technica lInforma t ion Pa pers. Appendix A liststhe members of the P lanning AdvisoryCommit t ee (PAC) who were consu ltedthroughout th e plan ning process. Italso includes an explana t ion of the roleof the PAC in the Par t 150 upda te

ii

process. Appendix B, Coordina t ion ,Consulta t ion , a nd Public In volvement ,summarizes the pla nning pr ocess , loca lcoor d i n a t i on , a n d t h e p u b l i cinvolvement process.

Appendix C con ta ins a verba t im copy ofthe In t egra ted Noise Model out putrepor t . This appen dix is conta inedwith in the Noise Exposur e Maps (NEM)document .

Ap p e n d i x D con t a in s s a m p l eimplementa t ion mater ia ls for theva r ious recommenda t ions conta inedwith in the NCP.

Appendix E con t a ins s u ppor t in gin format ion for lan d use r egu la t ionsbelow the 65 DNL contour .

For the convenience of FAA reviewers ,the FAA’s officia l Noise Compa t ibilityChecklist is presen ted on pa ges iiith rough viii.

iii

F .A .R . P A R T 1 5 0

N O IS E C O MP A T IB IL IT Y P R O G R AM C H E C K LIS T

A I R P O R T N A M E : L in c o l n A i r p o r t R E V IE W E R : ____________________

L i n c o l n , N e b r a s k a

Yes /No/NA

Page No . /

Other Reference

I. ID EN TIFICATION AND SUBMISSION OF P ROGRAM:

A. Subm itta l is properly identified:

1. F .A.R. 150 N CP ? Yes Tit le P age; p. i

2. NEM and NCP toge the r? No

3. P rogram revis ion? No

B. Airport an d Airport Opera tor’s na me ident ified? Yes Tit le P age; p. i

C. NCP tr an sm itted by airport operat or cover let ter ? Yes

II . CONS ULTATION: [150.23]

A. Docu men ta t ion in clu des n ar ra t ive of pu blic par t icipa t ion and

consulta tion process?

Yes Appendix B; supplementa l

volum e t itled “Su ppor t ing

Informat ion on P roject

Coor din a t ion and Loca l

Consu lt a t ion”

B. Identification of consulted par ties:

1. all part ies in 150.23(c) consu lted? Yes Appendix A; Appen dix B;

and supplemen ta l volume

t it led “Suppor t ing



Consu lt a t ion”

2. public an d plann ing agencies ident ified? Yes Appendix A; Appen dix B;





Consu lt a t ion”

3. agencies in 2, a bove, corres pon d t o those in dicated on the

NE M? Yes Appendix A; Appen dix B;





Consu lt a t ion”

C. Satisfies 150.23(d) requirement s?

1. docu men ta t ion sh ows act ive and d ir ect pa r t icipa t ion of

par ties in B, above? Yes Appendix B; supplementa l




Consu lt a t ion”

2. act ive a nd direct pa r t icip a t ion of gener a l public? Yes Appendix A; Appen dix B;

supp lemen ta l volum e titled

“Suppor t ing In forma t ion on

Project Coord ina t ion and

Loca l Con su lt a t ion ”

iv

F .A .R . P A R T 1 5 0


A I R P O R T N A M E : L in c o l n A i r p o r t R E V IE W E R : _________________


Yes /No/NA

Page No . /

Other Reference

3. pa rt icipat ion wa s pr ior t o and du rin g developm en t of NCP

and pr ior to subm it ta l t o F AA? Yes Appendix B; supplementa l




Consu lt a t ion”

4. indicates a dequate opport un ity afforded to submit views,

da ta , et c.? Yes Appendix B; supplementa l




Consu lt a t ion”

D. Eviden ce included of notice and oppor tun ity for a pu blic hea r ing

on N CP ? Yes Appendix B; supplementa l




Consu lt a t ion”

E. Docum enta tion of comm ents:

1. includes su mmary of pu blic hea r ing commen ts, if hea r ing

was h eld? Yes Appendix B; supplementa l




Consu lt a t ion”

2. in clu des copy of a ll wr it t en mater ia l subm it ted to opera tor? Yes Supp lemen ta l volum e titled




3. includes opera tor’s res ponses/disposition of writt en a nd

verbal comm ents? Yes Supp lemen ta l volum e titled




F . Inform al agreement received from FAA on flight procedures? Yes The local tower m an ager

was involved in the

P lann ing Advisory

Comm itt ee (PAC) meet ings

and ind ica t ed agreemen t

wit h flight pr ocedu res .

FAA rep res en ta t ive from

Air por t s Division of the

Centra l Region also

att ended PAC meetings.

v

F .A .R . P A R T 1 5 0




Yes /No/NA

Page No . /

Other Reference

II I. NOISE EXP OSUR E MAP S: [150.23, B150.3, 150.35(f)] (This

section of the checklist is not a su bstitute for t he Noise Exposur e

Map Checklist. It deals with ma ps in th e cont ext of the N oise

Compa t ibilit y P rogra m su bm iss ion.)

A. In clu sion of NEMs and s upp or t in g documen ta t ion :

1. Map d ocum en ta tion eit he r in clud ed or incorpora ted by

referen ce? Yes

Noise Exposur e Maps

submit t ed in Februa ry

2003.

2. Ma ps previou sly found in com pliance by FAA? Yes

3. Compliance determ inat ion st ill valid? Yes

4. Does 180-day per iod have to wa it for map com plia nce

findin g? Yes

B. Revised N EMs subm itt ed wit h pr ogra m: (Review u sin g NE M

check list if ma p r evisions in cluded in NCP su bm itt a l?

1. Revised N EMs in cluded wit h pr ogra m? No

2. Ha s air port opera tor r equest ed FAA to ma ke a

deter min at ion on t he N EM(s) when NCP appr oval is ma de? No

C. If progra m ana lysis u ses noise m odeling:

1. INM, HN M, or F AA-appr oved equivalent ? Yes

2. Monitorin g in accorda nce with A150.5? No

D. Existing condition an d 5-year ma ps clearly ident ified as th e

official NEMs? Yes

IV. CONSID ER ATION OF ALTERN ATIVES : [B15 0.7, 150.23(e )]

A. At a minim um , are t he a ltern at ives below considered?

1. land acquisition an d interests th erein, including air right s,

easement s, and development rights? Yes Cha pter 5, pp. 5-21 - 5-23,

5-25 - 5-28

2. ba r r ier s, a coust ical sh ieldin g, pu blic buildin g

soundpr oofing? Yes Cha pter 4, pp. 4-8 - 4-10,

pp. 4-31 - 4-34, Table 4D, p.

4- 35

Cha pter 5, pp. 5-23 - 5-24

3. preferen tial r un way system ? Yes Ch apter 4, p. 4-3 - 4-4

vi

F .A .R . P A R T 1 5 0




Yes /No/NA

Page No . /

Other Reference

4. flight procedures? Yes Chapt er 4, pp. 4-4 - 4-5, p.

4-6, pp. 4-28 - 4-31

Table 4D, pp. 4-35

5. r es t r ict ion on type/cla ss of air cra ft (at least one r es t r ict ion

below mu st be checked)

a . deny use based on F ederal stan dards? Yes Cha pter 4, pp. 4-15 - 4-19

b. capacity limits based on n oisiness? Yes Cha pter 4, p. 4-20

c. noise abatem ent t akeoff/approach procedures? Yes Cha pter 4, pp. 4-11 - 4-15

d. lan din g fees ba sed on n oise or t ime of da y? Yes Cha pter 4, pp. 4-20 - 4-22

e. nighttime rest rictions? Yes Cha pter 4, pp. 4-24 - 4-26

6. other act ion s with beneficia l im pact? Yes Cha pter 4, pp. 4-20 - 4-26

7. oth er FAA recomm endat ions? N/A

B. Responsible im plemen t in g a u thor it y id en t ified for ea ch

consider ed alter na tive? Yes Cha pter 5, Table 5B, p.5-29

C. Ana lysis of altern ative measur es:

1. mea sur es clearly described? Yes Cha pter 4, pp. 4-3 - 4-35

Cha pter 5, pp. 5-7 - 5-29

2. mea sur es adequa tely ana lyzed? Yes Cha pter 4, pp. 4-3 - 4-35

Cha pter 5, pp. 5-7 - 5-29

vii

F .A .R . P A R T 1 5 0




Yes /No/NA

Page No . /

Other Reference

3. adequat e reasoning for r ejecting alterna tives? Yes Cha pter 4, pp. 4-3 - 4-35

Cha pter 5, pp. 5-7 - 5-29

D. Ot her act ion s recom mended by the FAA:

Should oth er a ctions be added?

(lis t se pa ra tely or on ba ck of th is form act ion s a nd d iscuss ion s

with a ir por t ope ra tor to have them in clu ded p r ior to the s ta r t of

th e 180-day cycle)

N/A

V. ALTERNATIVES RECOMMENDED FOR IMPLEMENTATION:

[150.23(e), B150.7(c); 150.35(b), B150.5]

A. Docum ent clearly indicates:

1. a lt er na t ives r ecom men ded for im plem en ta t ion ? Yes Cha pter 6, pp. 6-2 - 6-19,

Table 6C, pp.6-20 - 6-22

2. fina l r ecom men da t ion s a re a ir por t ope ra tors, not those of

consu lt an t or t h ird pa r ty? Yes Sp onsor ’s Cer t ifica t ion ,

p. x

B. Do all progra m r ecomm endat ions:

1. rela te dir ectly or indirectly to reduction of noise and

noncompat ible lan d uses? Yes Cha pter 6, pp. 6-2 - 6-19

2. cont ain description of cont ribut ion t o overa ll effectiveness

of pr ogra m? Yes Cha pter 6, pp. 6-2 - 6-19

3. noise/lan d use ben efits qua nt ified to exten t possible? Yes Cha pter 6, pp. 6-2 - 6-19

4. include actu al/an ticipated effect on reducing noise exposur e

with in n oncompa tible ar ea s hown on NE M? Yes Cha pter 6, pp. 6-2 - 6-19

5. effects based on r elevant an d rea sonable expressed

assum ptions? Yes Chap te r 4, Cha pt er s 5 & 6

6. have adequ a te s upp or t in g da ta to su pp or t it s con t r ibu t ion

to noise/land u se comp at ibility? Yes Chap te r 4, Cha pt er s 5 & 6

C. Ana lysis a ppear s t o suppor t pr ogra m st anda rds s et for th in

150.35 (b) an d B150.5? Yes Chap te r 4, Cha pt er s 5 & 6

viii

F .A .R . P A R T 1 5 0




Yes /No/NA

Page No . /

Other Reference

D. When u se rest rictions a re r ecomm ended:

1. a re a lt er na t ives with poten t ia lly sign ifica n t

noise/compat ible lan d use benefits thoroughly analyzed so

th at appr opriate compar isons a nd conclusions can be ma de? N/A No use r e st r ict ions

recomm ended.

2. use r est r ictions coord ina ted wit h APP -600 pr ior t o ma kin g

determ ination on star t of 180-days? N/A

E. Do the following also meet P ar t 150 analytical stan dards:

1. form al recomm endat ions which cont inue existing practices? N/A

2. new r ecom mendat ion s or changes proposed a t end of P ar t

150 process? N/A

F . Docum en ta t ion in dicat es h ow recommen da t ions m ay cha nge

previously adopted plan s? N/A

G. Docu men ta t ion a lso:

1. iden t ifies agencies wh ich a re r esp ons ible for implem en t ing

each r ecommenda t ion? Yes Cha pter 6, pp. 6-2 - 6-19,

Table 6C, pp.6-20 - 6-22

2. indicat es whet her th ose agencies ha ve agree t o implem ent ? Yes Sponsor’s Certificat ion on p.

x. By app roving NCP ,

Airpor t Author ity has

agr eed to seriously consider

implemen ta t ion of t he

measures for which it has

sole respons ibility, provided

th at fun ding is available. It

has also agreed to

encour age other

organizat ions a nd a gencies

to ta ke a ny r ecomm ended

a ct ion s p er N CP .

3. indicat es e ssen t ial gover nmen t actions necessary to

implement recomm endat ions? Yes Cha pter 6, pp. 6-2 - 6-19,

Table 6C, pp.6-20 - 6-22

H. Timefram e:

1. includes agreed-upon schedule to implement altern atives? Yes Cha pter 6, pp. 6-2 - 6-19,

Table 6C, pp.6-20 - 6-22

ix

F .A .R . P A R T 1 5 0




Yes /No/NA

Page No . /

Other Reference

2. indicat es per iod cover ed by t he pr ogra m? Yes Cha pter 6, pp. 6-2 - 6-19,

Table 6C, pp.6-20 - 6-22

I. Fu nding/Costs:

1. includes costs to implement a lterna tives? Yes Cha pter 6, pp. 6-2 - 6-19,

Table 6C, pp.6-20 - 6-22

2. includes anticipated fun ding sour ces? Yes Cha pter 6, pp. 6-2 - 6-19,

Table 6C, pp.6-20 - 6-22

VI. PROGRAM REVISION [150.23(e)(9)] Supp ort ing

d o cu m e n ta ti on i n cl ud e s pr ov is io n fo r r ev is io n ? Yes Cha pter 6, pp. 6-16 -6-18

x

S P ON S OR’S CER TIFICATION

The Noise Compat ibility P rogr am and accompanying documenta t ion for LincolnAir por t , includin g the descrip t ion of consu lta t ion and opportunity for pu blicinvolvement , submit ted in accordance with F .A.R. P ar t 150, a nd hereby cer t ified ast rue and complet e t o the best of my kn owledge and belief. It is h ereby cert ified t ha tadequa te oppor tunity has been afforded in teres ted persons to subm it views, da ta , andcomments on the Noise Compat ibility Program.

_________________________ ___________________________________

Date of S igna ture J ohn Wood, E xecut ive DirectorLincoln Airport Author ity

airport noise plan - lincoln, nebraska suggested run-up ramp layout ..... after page 6-4 6c...

Documents