aashto - rigid pavement

Upload: engdbt

Post on 03-Mar-2018

290 views

Category:

Documents


7 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    1/83

    Page 1

    Note 1: Click CTRL+ on our keboard before usin this sreadsheet in EXCEL97.

    Note 2: Due to different monitor, EXCEL, and fonts caabilities on different com uters, the text on some of the

    sheets ma be truncated. It ma be necessar to unrotect the sheet and resize some of the columns.

    Note 3: This sreadsheet needs to be coied to the hard drive to be used. It cannot be run off a flo drive.

    Note 4: Fiures accom anin the text are scanned into the sreadsheet. For clarit of these fiures it ma be

    useful to print these pages and use the printed figures.

    I. Input Sheet - General Information

    l The general information section requests information about the agency. Thisinformation is not required for the analysis, but the information entered heremay be displayed on the "Results" sheet.

    II. Input Sheet - Design Information

    l All design inputs are required except sensitivity analysis.

    No default values are used.l Information can be retrieved from the "Saved Data" sheet using the "Retrieve Data"button. The existing data can be replaced or saved as a new set using the

    "Save Data" button.Clicking on the "Retrieve Data" button opens the "Saved Data" sheet. Select the

    appropriate row to be retrieved and click on the "Export" button.If the retrieval is successful, the data are retreived. Changes can be made and savedas a new data set using a different value for the search ID. The data can alsobe overwritten using the same search ID. The search value can be text, numbers, or acombination of the two that uniquely identifies the data (example: Project Numbers).This feature can also be used to save a default set of values.

    Using the "Clear All" ID to retrieve the "Clear All" data set clears all the data inthe spreadsheet.

    l Design information such as initial and terminal serviceability, concrete properties, baseproperties, and reliability and standard deviation can be input in the appropriate cells.Table 14 provides help for estimating base property values.

    Climatic properties such as wind, temperature, and precipitation, which are required forpositive temperature differential calculation, can be estimated using the table of climaticproperties for major cities provided in table 15.

    A pavement type can be selected by clicking the option buttons provided. For JPCP andJRCP, the joint spacing needs to be entered in ft in the space provided. Thisautomatically calculates the effective joint spacing to be used in design.

    l Edge support can also be selected using the option buttons provided. Thisautomatically calculates the edge support factor to be used in design.

    l A first run MUST be performed using design inputs for all variables and using anestimated effective subgrade k-value. This determines an approximate slab thicknessfor the inputs provided. The user can then navigate to the seasonal k-value calculationsheet (and, if necessary, the "Fill/Rigid Layer" sheet) to calculate the k-value adjusted for

    the effects of season and presence of fill section or rigid layer beneath the pavement.

    (The approximate slab thickness obtained from the first run is used in calculating the damageduring different seasons of the year.)Approximately 3 to 4 iterations will be required (i.e., after a first run with a trial k-value,

    a trial thickness is obtained). The "Calculate seasonal k-value" button can then be used tocalculate a seasonally adjusted k-value. This is exported back to the "Input Form" sheet.The slab thickness is calculated again using the new k-value. This changes the seasonaladjusted k-value and the procedure need to be repeated again. This is done till the

    change in thickness does not change the seasonally adjusted k-value.Detailed information on k-value is provided in the "k-Value Information" Sheet.

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    2/83

    Page 2

    l A traffic calculation should be performed before the first run. This will result in

    a more appropriate slab thickness for the seasonal k-value computation.l After all the design information has been entered, clicking on the "Calculate" button

    displays the design thickness at the bottom of the Input Form.The above calculation is performed in the "Calculation Sheet" sheet. The "Calculation Sheet"also provides the design traffic for slab thicknesses varying from 7 in to 15 inches, in incrementsof 0.5 in. The next row is not locked, to enable the user to change any variable and

    observe its effects on the design traffic. The last row is locked and represents the thicknessfor the traffic and other inputs provided by the user in the Input Form.

    l Sensitivity analysis can also be performed from the Input Form. A desired thicknesscan be input, or the calculated thickness for the input design variable can be imported.The sensitivity analysis produces a graph on a sheet labeled "Sensitivity (Other)."The sensitivity for thickness vs. traffic is created automatically on the"Sensitivity (Thickness)" sheet.The actual data for the sensitivity analysis is contained in a sheet called "Sensitivity Sheet;"

    this sheet is hidden.l The Input Form also contains a link to the "Faulting Check" sheet for JRCP andJPCP. For CRCP, the "Faulting Check" sheet and the "Corner Break Check" sheetremain hidden.

    l Red dots or flags at the top right corners of cells indicate that a note is attached to that cell.

    This note can be read by moving the mouse over that cell.NOTE: This spreadsheet was created in Excel95. Due to compatibility problems with Excel97,

    the larger notes are partially cut off (because Excel97 displays notes with fixed sizes as default).To see the entire note, a macro is written in this spreadsheet to change the size of notesthat are bigger than the comment box (The notes in Excel97 are now called comments).However, the user must run this macro by pressing "ctrl+j" each time the spreadsheet is

    opened in Excel97. This command does not affect spreadsheets in Excel95.l Certain cells are locked to prevent accidental erasure. Cells can only be locked when the

    sheet is also protected, so some sheets are protected. To unprotect a sheet, go to Toolson the menu, select Protection and select Unprotect Sheet. This creates the potentialfor accidental erasure, so it is useful to keep the sheet protected. To reprotect thesheet, select Tools, Protection, Protect Sheet and select OK without entering a password.

    The workbook should not be protected because some of the Excel basic programs (macros)need the workbook to be unprotected to be executed.For the same reason, the "Sensitivity Sheet" (which is hidden) and the "Saved Data"sheet should not be protected. Hidden sheets can be viewed by using Format, Sheet, Unhide,or Edit, Sheet, Unhide from the menu.

    III. Faulting Check Sheet

    l For jointed pavements, the Input Form links to the "Faulting Check" sheet. All cells

    need to be input in this sheet. The cells that do not need to be input are hidden usingthe outlining ("+") at the left of the sheet. To observe the values at this location, the sheet hasto be unprotected and the "+" clicked.

    Each time a cell value is changed, the "Calculate" button needs to be clicked to calculatefaulting, which is displayed at the bottom of the sheet. This is then compared with the criteriaset at the bottom of the sheet to "PASS" or "FAIL" the design.The criteria can be changed by changing the values in the criteria table.

    l The doweled and nondoweled sheets are designed independent of each other to providethe user control over the individual design. For example, the user may decide to provide

    l While making a one-on-one comparison between the faulting check for the doweled andnondoweled designs, the user needs to ensure that all values are comparable.

    l Corner break checks need to be performed only for nondoweled pavements. This sheet

    edgedrains for the nondoweled design, which will change the drainage coefficient, Cd.

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    3/83

    Page 3

    can be accessed by clicking on the "Corner Break Check" button.

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    4/83

    Page 4

    Table 14. Modulus of elasticity and coefficient of friction for various base types.

    Base Type or

    Interface Treatment

    Modulus of

    Elasticity

    (psi)

    Peak Friction Coefficient

    low mean high

    Fine-grained soil 3,000 - 40,000 0. 1.3 !.0

    "and 10,000 - !,000 0. 0.# 1.0

    $ggregate 1,000 - 4,000 0.% 1.4 !.0

    &olyet'ylene s'eeting $ 0. 0. 1.0

    *i+e-stabilied clay !0,000 - %0,000 3.0 $ .3

    e+ent-treated gravel (00 ") / 1000 #.0 34 3

    $sp'alt-treated gravel 300,000 - 00,000 3.% .# 10

    *ean concrete it'out

    curing co+pound

    (00 ") / 1000 3

    *ean concrete it' single

    or double a2 curing

    co+pound

    (00 ") / 1000 3. 4.

    otes " co+pressive strengt', psi

    *o, +ean, and 'ig' +easured pea5 coefficients of friction su++aried fro+ various references

    are s'on above.

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    5/83

    Page 5

    6dge7rains

    &recip.*evel

    Fine-8rained "ubgrade oarse-8rained "ubgrade

    onper+eable

    9ase

    &er+eable

    9ase

    onper+eable

    9ase

    &er+eable

    9ase

    o :et 0.%0-0.;0 0.#-0.; 0.%-0.; 0.;0-1.00

    7ry 0.;0-1.10 0.;-1.10 0.;0-1.1 1.00-1.1

    day (30 +>day) or unifor+ity coefficient (u) .3. :et cli+ate &recipitation ! in>year (3 ++>year)=

    7ry cli+ate &recipitation ! in>year (3 ++>year).4. "elect +idpoint of range and use ot'er drainage features (ade?uacy of cross slopes, dept' ofditc'es, presence of daylig'ting, relative drainability of base course, bat'tub design, etc.) to ad@ust upardor donard.

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    6/83

    Page 6

    Table 1. Mean annual te+perature, precipitation, and ind speed for selected A.". cities.

    *ocation Mean$nnualTe+perature,

    BF

    Mean$nnual&re

    cipitation,

    in

    Mean$nnual:ind"peed,+p'

    *ocation Mean$nnualTe+perature,

    BF

    Mean$nnual&re

    cipitation,

    in

    Mean$nnual:ind"peed,+p'

    *ocation Mean$nnualTe+perature,

    BF

    Mean$nnual&re

    cipitation,

    in

    Mean$nnual:ind"peed,+p'

    $*$9$M$ C$"$" DC*$EDM$

    9ir+ing'a+ !.! !.! %.! Tope5a 4.1 !#. 10.1 D5la'o+a ity ;.; 30.; 1!.

    Mobile %. 4. ;.0 :ic'ita .4 40.1 1!.3 Tulsa 0.3 3#.# 10.4

    Montgo+ery %. 4;.! .% C6TAC< D68D

    $*$"C$ *e2ington 4.; 4.% %.1 Medford 3. 1;.# 4.#

    $nc'orage 3.3 1.! .; *ouisville .! 43. #.3 &ortland 3.0 3%.4 %.;

    Fairban5s !.; 10.4 . *DAG"G$$ "ale+ !.0 40.4 %.0Cing "al+on 3!.# 1;.3 10.# 9aton ouge %. .# %.% &6"

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    7/83

    Page 7

    "avanna' .; 4;.% %.; $lbany 4%.3 3.% #.; orfol5 ;. 4.! 10.

    E$:$GG 9uffalo 4%. 3%. 1!.1 ic'+ond %.% 44.1 %.

    Eilo %3. 1!#.! %.1 e

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    8/83

    Rigid Pavement Design - Based on AASHTO Supplemental Guide

    I. General

    Agency:INCOStreet Address:City:SOROAKOState:

    Project Number:35391 ID: INCO

    Description:Ramp Access Road

    Location:Soroako

    II. Design

    ServiceabilityInitial Serviceability, P1: 4.5 Joint Spacing:

    Terminal Serviceability, P2: 2.526.2 ft

    PCC Properties

    725 psi JRCP

    3,500,000 psi

    Poisson's Ratio for Concrete, m: 0.15 Effective Joint Spacing: 314.964in

    Base Properties

    1,000,000 psi

    9.8 inSlab-Base Friction Factor, f: 1.4

    Reliability and Standard Deviation

    Reliability Level (R): 90.0 % Edge Support Factor: 0.94

    0.30

    Climatic Properties Slab Thickness used for

    Mean Annual Wind Speed, WIND: 45.0 mph Sensitivity Analysis: 15.40 in

    Mean Annual Air Temperature, TEMP: 86.0

    Mean Annual Precipitation, PRECIP: 25.4 in

    Subgrade k-Value

    200psi/in

    Design ESALs

    11.3million

    Calculated Slab Thickness for Above Inputs: 15.40in

    Reference:LTPP DATA ANALYSIS - Phase I: Validation of Guidelines for k-Value Selection and Concrete

    Pavement Performance Prediction

    -ay ean ouus o upture,c:

    astic ouus o a,c:

    astic ouus o ase,b:

    esgn cness o ase,b:

    vera tanar eviation,0:

    oF

    Pavement Type, Joint Spacing (L)

    PCP

    RCP

    CRCP

    Edge Support

    Conventional 12-t !ide tra"c lan

    Conventional 12-t !ide tra"c lane # tied P

    2-t !idened $la% !&conventional 12-t tra"

    Sen$itivity 'naly$i$

    odulu$ o Ruptur Ela$tic odulu$ (Sla

    Ela$tic odulu$ (a$e a$e T*ic+ne$$

    +-alue oint Spacing

    Relia%ility Standard eviation

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    9/83

    Rigid Pavement Design - Based on AASHTO Supplemental Guide

    Results

    Project #35391

    Description:Ramp Access Road

    Location:Soroako

    Slab Thickness Design

    Pavement Type JRCP18-kip ESALs Over Initial Performance Period (million) 11.25 million

    Initial Serviceability 4.5Terminal Serviceability 2.528-day Mean PCC Modulus of Rupture 725 psiElastic Modulus of Slab 3,500,000 psiElastic Modulus of Base 1,000,000 psi

    Base Thickness 9.8 in.Mean Effective k-Value 200 psi/inReliability Level 90 %

    Overall Standard Deviation 0.3

    Calculated Design Thickness 15.40 in

    Temperature Differential

    Mean Annual Wind Speed 45 mph

    Mean Annual Air Temperature 86Mean Annual Precipitation 25.4 in

    Maximum Positive Temperature Differential 28.53

    Modulus of Subgrade Reaction

    Period Description Subgrade k-Value, psi

    eerence: - ase : a aon o u enes or -aue eecon an oncree

    Pavement Performance Prediction

    oF

    oF

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    10/83

    Seasonally Adjusted Modulus of Subgrade Reaction 165 psi/in

    Modulus of Subgrade Reaction Adjusted for Rigid Layer

    and Fill Section 0 psi/in

    Traffic

    Performance Period 20 yearsTwo-Way ADT 64

    Number of Lanes in Design Direction 1Percent of All Trucks in Design Lane 100%Percent Trucks in Design Direction 100%

    Vehicle Class Percent of Annual Initial Annual Accumulated

    ADT Growth Truck FactorGrowth in18-kip ESALsTruck Factor (millions)

    1 100.0% 4.0% 16.3 11.25

    Total Calculated Cumulative ESALs 11.25 million

    Faulting

    Doweled

    Dowel Diameter 1.26 in

    Drainage Coefficient 0.90

    Average Fault for Design Years with Design Inputs inCriteria Check

    Nondoweled

    Drainage Coefficient 0.9

    Average Fault for Design Years with Design Inputs inCriteria Check

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    11/83

    Calculation Sheet

    Page 11

    D Design Traffic L E l F Term1 Term2 Term3 Term4(in) MESALs in in

    7.0 0.27 315 0.94 26.75 1.42 -1.94 0.60 1.08 -0.21

    7.5 0.20 315 0.94 28.17 1.39 -1.94 0.61 1.03 -0.19

    8.0 0.19 315 0.94 29.56 1.37 -1.94 0.62 0.98 -0.18

    8.5 0.20 315 0.94 30.94 1.34 -1.94 0.63 0.93 -0.17

    9.0 0.24 315 0.94 32.29 1.31 -1.94 0.64 0.89 -0.16

    9.5 0.29 315 0.94 33.63 1.29 -1.94 0.64 0.86 -0.15

    10.0 0.37 315 0.94 34.95 1.26 -1.94 0.65 0.83 -0.15

    10.5 0.49 315 0.94 36.25 1.23 -1.94 0.66 0.80 -0.14

    11.0 0.66 315 0.94 37.54 1.20 -1.94 0.67 0.77 -0.13

    11.5 0.90 315 0.94 38.81 1.18 -1.94 0.68 0.74 -0.13

    12.0 1.23 315 0.94 40.07 1.15 -1.94 0.68 0.72 -0.12

    12.5 1.69 315 0.94 41.32 1.12 -1.94 0.69 0.70 -0.12

    13.0 2.34 315 0.94 42.55 1.09 -1.94 0.70 0.68 -0.11

    13.5 3.25 315 0.94 43.77 1.07 -1.94 0.70 0.66 -0.11

    14.0 4.51 315 0.94 44.98 1.04 -1.94 0.71 0.64 -0.10

    14.5 6.27 315 0.94 46.18 1.01 -1.94 0.72 0.63 -0.10

    15.0 8.71 315 0.94 47.37 0.99 -1.94 0.72 0.61 -0.10

    11.00 0.66 315 0.94 37.54 1.20 -1.94 0.67 0.77 -0.13

    15.40 11.31 315 0.94 48.30 0.96 -1.94 0.73 0.60 -0.09

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    12/83

    Calculation Sheet

    Page 12

    Term5 Term6 Term7 log b b TD L Epsi psi in

    0.76 -0.15 -0.74 -0.60 0.2523 24.46 57.1 547.5 180 1.00

    0.72 -0.16 -0.66 -0.60 0.2513 24.96 61.2 583.8 180 1.00

    0.69 -0.16 -0.60 -0.60 0.2487 25.40 63.2 593.9 180 1.00

    0.66 -0.17 -0.55 -0.61 0.2449 25.78 63.7 586.4 180 1.00

    0.63 -0.17 -0.50 -0.62 0.2404 26.12 63.2 567.8 180 1.00

    0.61 -0.18 -0.47 -0.63 0.2356 26.43 62.1 542.5 180 1.00

    0.58 -0.18 -0.43 -0.64 0.2305 26.70 60.7 513.3 180 1.00

    0.56 -0.18 -0.40 -0.65 0.2254 26.95 59.0 482.5 180 1.00

    0.54 -0.19 -0.37 -0.66 0.2202 27.17 57.1 451.4 180 1.00

    0.53 -0.19 -0.35 -0.67 0.2152 27.38 55.2 420.8 180 1.00

    0.51 -0.20 -0.33 -0.68 0.2104 27.57 53.3 391.3 180 1.00

    0.49 -0.20 -0.31 -0.69 0.2056 27.74 51.4 363.1 180 1.00

    0.48 -0.20 -0.29 -0.70 0.2011 27.90 49.5 336.6 180 1.00

    0.47 -0.21 -0.27 -0.71 0.1968 28.05 47.7 311.7 180 1.00

    0.45 -0.21 -0.26 -0.72 0.1926 28.19 45.9 288.4 180 1.00

    0.44 -0.22 -0.25 -0.72 0.1886 28.32 44.2 266.8 180 1.00

    0.43 -0.22 -0.23 -0.73 0.1848 28.44 42.6 246.7 180 1.00

    0.54 -0.19 -0.37 -0.66 0.2202 27.17 57.1 451.4 180 1.00

    0.42 -0.22 -0.23 -0.74 0.1819 28.53 41.3 231.8 180 1.00

    l

    t'

    oF

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    13/83

    Calculation Sheet

    Page 13

    l F Term1 Term2 Term3 Term4 Term5 Term6 Term7 log bin

    32.65 1.10 -1.94 0.49 0.51 -0.17 0.09 -0.18 -0.23 -1.44

    34.39 1.10 -1.94 0.50 0.48 -0.16 0.09 -0.19 -0.21 -1.44

    36.09 1.09 -1.94 0.51 0.46 -0.15 0.08 -0.20 -0.19 -1.43

    37.77 1.08 -1.94 0.51 0.44 -0.14 0.08 -0.20 -0.17 -1.43

    39.43 1.08 -1.94 0.52 0.42 -0.13 0.08 -0.21 -0.16 -1.43

    41.06 1.07 -1.94 0.53 0.40 -0.13 0.07 -0.21 -0.15 -1.43

    42.67 1.07 -1.94 0.53 0.39 -0.12 0.07 -0.22 -0.14 -1.43

    44.26 1.06 -1.94 0.54 0.37 -0.11 0.07 -0.22 -0.13 -1.43

    45.83 1.05 -1.94 0.55 0.36 -0.11 0.07 -0.23 -0.12 -1.43

    47.38 1.05 -1.94 0.55 0.35 -0.10 0.06 -0.23 -0.11 -1.43

    48.92 1.04 -1.94 0.56 0.34 -0.10 0.06 -0.24 -0.10 -1.43

    50.44 1.03 -1.94 0.56 0.33 -0.10 0.06 -0.24 -0.10 -1.43

    51.95 1.03 -1.94 0.57 0.32 -0.09 0.06 -0.25 -0.09 -1.43

    53.44 1.02 -1.94 0.58 0.31 -0.09 0.06 -0.25 -0.09 -1.43

    54.92 1.02 -1.94 0.58 0.30 -0.08 0.05 -0.26 -0.08 -1.43

    56.38 1.01 -1.94 0.59 0.29 -0.08 0.05 -0.26 -0.08 -1.43

    57.83 1.00 -1.94 0.59 0.29 -0.08 0.05 -0.27 -0.07 -1.44

    45.83 1.05 -1.94 0.55 0.36 -0.11 0.07 -0.23 -0.12 -1.43

    58.97 1.00 -1.94 0.59 0.28 -0.08 0.05 -0.27 -0.07 -1.44

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    14/83

    Calculation Sheet

    Page 14

    b TD L1 L2 log R G Y log Wpsi psi kips

    0.0362 6.16 284.6 384.1 18 1 6.58 -0.176 1.37 6.45

    0.0367 6.69 258.9 353.9 18 1 6.77 -0.176 1.22 6.63

    0.0370 7.15 236.6 326.4 18 1 6.96 -0.176 1.14 6.80

    0.0373 7.56 217.0 301.6 18 1 7.13 -0.176 1.09 6.97

    0.0374 7.92 199.7 279.2 18 1 7.29 -0.176 1.06 7.13

    0.0375 8.24 184.4 258.8 18 1 7.45 -0.176 1.04 7.28

    0.0375 8.53 170.9 240.4 18 1 7.60 -0.176 1.03 7.42

    0.0375 8.79 158.8 223.7 18 1 7.74 -0.176 1.02 7.57

    0.0375 9.03 147.9 208.5 18 1 7.87 -0.176 1.01 7.70

    0.0374 9.25 138.2 194.7 18 1 8.00 -0.176 1.01 7.83

    0.0373 9.45 129.4 182.1 18 1 8.13 -0.176 1.01 7.95

    0.0372 9.64 121.4 170.6 18 1 8.25 -0.176 1.00 8.07

    0.0371 9.81 114.2 160.1 18 1 8.37 -0.176 1.00 8.19

    0.0370 9.96 107.6 150.4 18 1 8.48 -0.176 1.00 8.30

    0.0369 10.11 101.5 141.5 18 1 8.59 -0.176 1.00 8.41

    0.0367 10.25 96.0 133.3 18 1 8.69 -0.176 1.00 8.52

    0.0366 10.37 90.9 125.8 18 1 8.79 -0.176 1.00 8.62

    0.0375 9.03 147.9 208.5 18 1 7.87 -0.176 1.01 7.70

    0.0365 10.47 87.2 120.2 18 1 8.87 -0.176 1.00 8.69

    l

    t

    oF

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    15/83

    Calculation Sheet

    Page 15

    log W'W'(50%) ZMESALs MESALS

    5.82 0.66 1.282 0.27 5.44

    5.69 0.50 1.282 0.20 5.31

    5.66 0.46 1.282 0.19 5.28 -14.711

    5.69 0.49 1.282 0.20 5.31 4.336

    5.76 0.57 1.282 0.24 5.37

    5.85 0.71 1.282 0.29 5.46 0.941

    5.96 0.90 1.282 0.37 5.57 0.632

    6.08 1.19 1.282 0.49 5.69

    6.20 1.60 1.282 0.66 5.82

    6.34 2.17 1.282 0.90 5.95

    6.47 2.98 1.282 1.23 6.09

    6.61 4.10 1.282 1.69 6.23

    6.75 5.68 1.282 2.34 6.37

    6.90 7.87 1.282 3.25 6.51

    7.04 10.93 1.282 4.51 6.65

    7.18 15.19 1.282 6.27 6.80

    7.32 21.12 1.282 8.71 6.94

    6.20 1.60 1.282 0.66 5.82

    7.44 27.41 1.282 11.31 7.05 15.3959385782 15.39593858

    W18 R

    log W18 RD = A

    0+ A

    1log W

    18 R

    A0=

    A1=

    R2=

    Stand Err of X =

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    16/83

    0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60

    0.00

    2.00

    4.00

    6.00

    8.00

    10.00

    12.00

    14.00

    16.00

    Sensitivity Analysis (Standard Deviation)

    Standard Deviation

    DesignTraffic,MESALs

    Modulus of

    Rupture = 725 psi

    Elastic Modulus of

    Concrete =

    3,500,000 psi

    Elastic Modulus of

    Base = 1,000,000

    psiBase Thickness =

    9.843 in

    k-Value of

    subgrade = 200

    psi/inJoint Spacing =

    26.247 ft

    Reliability = 90 %

    Standard

    Deviation = 0.2 to

    0.6Slab Thickness =

    15.4 in

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    17/83

    7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0

    0.10

    1.00

    10.00

    Sensitivity Analysis (Thickness)

    Slab Thickness, in

    DesignTraffic,MESALs

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    18/83

    Faulting

    DOWELED PAVEMENT NONDOWELED PAVEMENT

    Dowel Diameter: 1.26 in

    1,500,000 psi/in

    29,000,000 psi

    ALPHA: 0.000006

    TRANGE: 86.0 Days90: 17 days

    e: 0.00015strain

    D: 15.40 in D: 15.40 in

    P: 9,000 lbf

    T: 0.45

    FI: 91 FI: 91

    CESAL: 11.25 million CESAL: 11.25 millionAge: 20.0 years Age: 20.0 years

    0.90 0.90

    Faulting (doweled) Faulting (nondoweled)

    in in

    Faulting Check Faulting Check

    Recommended critical mean joint faulting levels for design (Table 28)

    Joint Spacing Critical Mean Joint Faulting

    < 25 ft 0.06 in

    > 25 ft 0.13 in

    Kd:

    Es:

    /oFoF

    oF-days oF-days

    Cd: C

    d:

    a$e&Sla% .rictional Re$traint

    Sta%ili/ed a$e

    'ggregate a$e or LC !& %ond %rea+er

    a$e Type

    Sta%ili/ed a$e

    0n$ta%ili/ed a$e

    a$e Type

    Sta%ili/ed a$e

    0n$ta%ili/ed a$e

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    19/83

    Note: Joint load position stress checks need to be performed only for nondoweled pavements

    Only two numbers need to be entered in this sheet:

    Temperature gradient

    Tensile stress at top of slab

    Step 1:

    Total Negative Temperature Differential

    Slab Thickness: 15.40in

    Total Negative Temperature Differential: 9.1

    Construction Curling and Moisture Gradient Temperature Differential

    Enter temperature gradient: (enter positive value from below)

    For temperature gradient use:

    Wet Climate: (Annual Precipitation >= 30 in or

    Thornthwaite Moisture Index > 0)

    Dry Climate: (Annual Precipitation < 30 in or

    Thornthwaite Moisture Index < 0)

    Total Effective Negative Temp. Differential: 9.1

    Step 2:

    Use one or more of the following charts to estimate the tensile stress at top of slab.

    Note that the charts show the variation of tensile stress with negative temperature differential

    for slab thicknesses ranging from 7 to 13 in. These are plotted for a base course thicknessof 6 in. The six charts represent three k-values (100, 250 and 500 psi/in) and two values for the

    elastic modulus of the base (25,000 psi and 1,000,000 psi). Use judgment to

    extrapolate the value of the tensile stress at the top of the slab from these charts.

    Enter Tensile Stress at Top of Slab: psi (use charts below)

    oF

    oF/in

    0 to 2oF/in

    1 to 3oF/in

    oF

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    20/83

    Step 3:

    Compare the above tensile stress with the maximum tensile stress at the bottom of the slab for

    which the slab is designed. For the given inputs and the above thickness, this value is

    232 psi

    The slab is designed for a tensile stress of 232psi.

    If the tensile stress at the top of the slab (obtained from the charts below and entered above) is

    less than the design stress, the design is acceptable. If the check fails, new inputs have to be provided.

    Corner Break Check:

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    21/83

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    22/83

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    23/83

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    24/83

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    25/83

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    26/83

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    27/83

    NOTE: The k-value used in this design procedure is not a composite k, as in the original AASHTO

    design procedure. The k-value to be input in the "Input Form" and in the "Seasonal k-Value" sheet

    is the actual subgrade soil modulus of subgrade reaction.

    The k-value input required for this design method is determined using the following steps:

    Step 1. Select a subgrade soil k-value for each season, using any of the three following methods:

    (a) Correlations with soil type and other soil properties or tests.

    (b) Deflection testing and backcalculation (recommended).

    (c) Plate bearing tests.

    Detailed information for Step 1 is included below.

    Step 2. The "Seasonal k-Value" Sheet can then be used to determine a seasonally adjusted

    effective k-value.

    Step 3. This seasonally adjusted effective k-value can then be adjusted for the effects of

    a shallow rigid layer, if present, or an embankment above the natural subgrade using the

    "Fill/Rigid Adjustment" sheet.

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    28/83

    Method A -- Correlations.Guidelines are presented for selecting an appropriate k-value based

    on soil classification, moisture level, density, California Bearing Ratio (CBR), or Dynamic Cone

    Penetrometer (DCP) data. These correlation methods are anticipated to be used routinely for

    design. The k-values obtained from soil type or tests correlation methods may need to be

    adjusted for embankment above the subgrade or a shallow rigid layer beneath the subgrade.

    The k-values and correlations for cohesive soils (A-4 through A-7): The bearing capacity of

    cohesive soils is strongly influenced by their degree of saturation (Sr, percent), which is a function

    of water content (w, percent), dry density (g, lb/ft3

    ), and specific gravity (Gs):

    Recommended k-values for each fine-grained soil type as a function of degree of saturation are

    shown in Figure 40. Each line represents the middle of a range of reasonable values for k. For

    any given soil type and degree of saturation, the range of values is about + 40 psi/in [11 kPa/mm].

    A reasonable lower limit for k at 100 percent saturation is considered to be 25 psi/in [7 kPa/mm ].

    Thus, for example, an A-6 soil might be expected to exhibit k-values between about 180 and 260

    psi/in [49 and 70 kPa/mm] at 50 percent saturation, and k-values between about 25 and 85 psi/in[7 and 23 kPa/mm] at 100 percent saturation.

    Two different types of materials can be classified as A-4: predominantly silty materials (at least 75

    percent passing the #200 sieve, possibly organic), and mixtures of silt, sand, and gravel (up to 64

    percent retained on #200 sieve). The former may have a density between about 90 and 105 lb/ft3

    [1442 and 1682 kg/m3

    ], and a CBR between about 4 and 8. The latter may have a density

    between about 100 and 125 lb/ft3

    [1602 and 2002 kg/m3

    ], and a CBR between about 5 and 15.

    The line labeled A-4 in Figure B-4 is more representative of the former group. If the material in

    question is A-4, but possesses the properties of the stronger subset of materials in the A-4 class,

    a higher k-value at any given degree of saturation (for example, along the line labeled A-7-6 in

    Figure 40) is appropriate.

    Recommended k-value ranges for fine-grained soils, along with typical ranges of dry density and

    CBR for each soil type, are summarized in Table 11.

    The k -values and correlations for cohesionless soils (A-1 and A-3):The bearing capacity of

    cohesionless materials is fairly insensitive to moisture variation and is predominantly a function of

    their void ratio and overall stress state. Recommended k-value ranges for cohesionless soils,

    along with typical ranges of dry density and CBR for each soil type, are summarized in Table 11.

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    29/83

    Figure 40. The k-value versus degree of saturation for cohesive soils

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    30/83

    Table 11. Recommended k-value ranges for various soil types.

    AASHTO

    Class

    Description Unified

    Class

    Dry

    Density

    (lb/ft3)

    CBR

    (perce

    nt)

    k Value

    (psi/in)

    Coarse-grained Soils:

    A-1-a, well graded

    gravel GW, GP

    125 - 140 60 - 80 300 - 450

    A-1-a, poorly graded 120 - 130 35 - 60 300 - 400

    A-1-b coarse sand SW 110 - 130 20 - 40 200 - 400

    A-3 fine sand SP 105 - 120 15 - 25 150 - 300

    A-2 Soils (granular materials with high fines):

    A-2-4, gravelly silty gravel GM 130 - 145 40 - 80 300 - 500

    A-2-5, gravelly silty sandy gravel

    A-2-4, sandy silty sand SM 120 - 135 20 - 40 300 - 400

    A-2-5, sandy silty gravelly sand

    A-2-6, gravelly clayey gravel GC 120 - 140 20 - 40 200 - 450

    A-2-7, gravelly clayey sandy gravel

    A-2-6, sandy clayey sand

    SC 105 - 130 10 - 20 150 - 350

    A-2-7, sandy clayey gravelly

    sand

    Fine-grained Soils:

    A-4

    silt

    ML, OL

    90 - 105 4 - 8 25 - 165 *

    silt/sand/

    gravel mixture

    100 - 125 5 - 15 40 - 220 *

    A-5 poorly graded

    silt

    MH 80 - 100 4 - 8 25 - 190 *

    A-6 plastic clay CL 100 - 125 5 - 15 25 - 255 *

    A-7-5 moderately plastic

    elastic clay

    CL, OL 90 - 125 4 - 15 25 - 215 *

    A-7-6 highly plasticelastic clay

    CH, OH 80 - 110 3 - 5 40 - 220 *

    * k-value of fine-grained soil is highly dependent on degree of saturation. See Figure 40.

    These recommended k-value ranges apply to a homogeneous soil layer at least 10 ft [3 m] thick. If an

    embankment layer less than 10 ft [3 m] thick exists over a softer subgrade, the k-value for the underlying

    soil should be estimated from this table and adjusted for the type and thickness of embankment material

    using Step 3. If a layer of bedrock exists within 10 ft [3 m] of the top of the soil, the k should be adjusted

    using Step 3. 1 lb/ft3=16.018 kg/m

    3, 1 psi/in = 0.271 kPa/mm

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    31/83

    The k-values and correlations for A-2 soils:Soils in the A-2 class are all granular materials

    falling between A-1 and A-3. Although it is difficult to predict the behavior of such a wide variety of

    materials, the available data indicate that in terms of bearing capacity, A-2 materials behave

    similarly to cohesionless materials of comparable density. Recommended k-value ranges for A-2

    soils, along with typical ranges of dry density and CBR for each soil type, are summarized in

    Table 11.

    Correlation of k-value to California Bearing Ratio:Figure 41 illustrates the approximate range

    of k-values that might be expected for a soil with a given CBR.

    Correlation of k-values to penetration rate by Dynamic Cone Penetrometer:Figure 42

    illustrates the range of k-values that might be expected for a soil with a given penetration rate

    (inches per blow) measured with a Dynamic Cone Penetrometer. This is a rapid hand-held testing

    device that can be used to quickly test dozens of locations along an alignment. The DCP can also

    penetrate AC surfaces and surface treatments to test the foundation below.

    Assignment of k-values to seasons.Among the factors that should be considered in selecting

    seasonal k-values are the seasonal movement of the water table, seasonal precipitation levels,

    winter frost depths, number of freeze-thaw cycles, and the extent to which the subgrade will be

    protected from frost by embankment material. A "frozen" k may not be appropriate for winter,

    even in a cold climate, if the frost will not reach and remain in a substantial thickness of the

    subgrade throughout the winter. If it is anticipated that a substantial depth (e.g., three feet or

    more) of the subgrade will be frozen, a k-value of 500 psi/in [135 kPa/mm] would be an

    appropriate "frozen" k.

    The seasonal variation in degree of saturation is difficult to predict, but in locations where a water

    table is constantly present at a depth of less than about 10 ft [3 m], it is reasonable to expect that

    fine-grained subgrades will remain at least 70 to 90 percent saturated, and may be completely

    saturated for substantial periods in the spring. County soil reports can provide data on the

    position of the high-water table (i.e., the typical depth to the water table at the time of the year that

    it is at its highest). Unfortunately, county soil reports do not provide data on the variation in depth

    to the water table throughout the year.

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    32/83

    Figure 41. Approximate relationship of k-value range to CBR.

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    33/83

    Figure 42. Approximate relationship of k-value range to DCP penetration rate.

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    34/83

    Method B Deflection Testing and Backcalculation Methods.These methods are suitable

    for determining k-value for design of overlays of existing pavements, for design of a reconstructed

    pavement on existing alignments, or for design of similar pavements in the same general location

    on the same type of subgrade. An agency may also use backcalculation methods to develop

    correlations between nondestructive deflection testing results and subgrade types and properties.

    Cut and fill sections are likely to yield different k-values. No embankment or rigid layer adjustment

    is required for backcalculated k-values if these characteristics are similar for the pavement being

    tested and the pavement being designed, but backcalculated dynamic k-values do need to be

    reduced by a factor of two to estimate a static elastic k-value for use in design which is required in

    this catalog.

    An appropriate design subgrade elastic k-value for use as an input to this design method is

    determined by the following steps:

    1. Measure deflections on an in-service concrete or composite (AC-overlaid PCC) pavement

    with the same or similar subgrade as the pavement being designed.

    2. Compute the appropriate AREA of each deflection basin.

    3.Compute an initial estimate (assuming an infinite slab size) of the radius of relative stiffness, l.

    4.Compute an initial estimate (assuming an infinite slab size) of the subgrade k-value.

    5. Compute adjustment factors for the maximum deflection d0and the initially estimated l to

    account for the finite slab size.

    6.Adjust the initially estimated k-value to account for the finite slab size.

    7.Compute the mean backcalculated subgrade k-value for all of the deflection basins

    considered.

    8.Compute the estimated mean static k-value for use in design for the specific season during

    the testing.

    9.Determine the effective seasonally adjusted elastic k-value considering the factors discussed

    above.

    These steps are described below, with the relevant equations for bare concrete and composite

    (asphalt concrete over concrete slab) pavements given for each step.

    Measure deflections.Measure slab deflection basins along the project at an interval sufficient to

    adequately assess conditions. Intervals of 100 to 1000 ft [30 to 300 m] are typical. Measure

    deflections with sensors located at 0, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 60 in [0, 203, 305, 457, 610, 915, and

    1524 mm] from the center of the load. Measure deflections in the outer wheel path. A heavy-load

    deflection device (e.g., Falling Weight Deflectometer) and a load magnitude of 9,000 lbf [40 kN]

    are recommended. ASTM D4694 and D4695 provide additional guidance on deflection testing.

    d

    d12+

    d

    d18+

    d

    d9+

    d

    d6+

    d

    d5+

    d

    d6+4=AREA

    603624181287

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    35/83

    Compute AREA.For a bare concrete pavement, compute the AREA7of each deflection basin

    using the following equation:

    where d0=deflection in center of loading plate, inches

    di= deflections at 0, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 60 in [0, 203, 305, 457, 610, 915, and 1524

    mm] from plate center, inches

    For a composite pavement, compute the AREA5of each deflection basin using the following

    equation:

    d

    d12+

    d

    d18+

    d

    d9+

    d

    d6+

    d

    d5+

    d

    d6+4=AREA

    0

    60

    0

    36

    0

    24

    0

    18

    0

    12

    0

    87

    d

    d12+

    d

    d18+

    d

    d9+

    d

    d6+3=AREA

    12

    60

    12

    36

    12

    24

    12

    185

    Estimate l assuming an infinite slab size.The radius of relative stiffness for a bare

    concrete pavement (assuming an infinite slab) may be estimated using the following equation:

    The radius of relative stiffness for a composite pavement (assuming an infinite slab) may be

    estimated using the following equation:

    Estimate k assuming an infinite slab size.For a bare concrete pavement, compute an

    0.698-

    289.708

    AREA60

    =

    7

    2.566

    est

    ln

    0.476-

    158.40

    AREA48

    =

    5

    2.220

    est

    ln

    ( )est2

    0

    *0

    estd

    dP=k

    [26]

    [27]

    [28]

    [30]

    [29]

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    36/83

    na esmae o e -vaue usng e oowng equaon:

    where k = backcalculated dynamic k-value, psi/in

    P = load, lb

    d0= deflection measured at center of load plate, inch

    lest = estimated radius of relative stiffness, inches, from previous step

    d0

    *= nondimensional coefficient of deflection at center of load plate:

    ( )est2

    0

    *0

    estd

    dP=k

    ( )[ ]e0.1245=d

    e0.14707-*0

    est-0.07565

    For a composite pavement, compute an initial estimate of the k-value using the following equation:

    d12= deflection measured 12 in [305 mm] from center of load plate, inch

    lest = estimated radius of relative stiffness, in, from previous step

    d12*= nondimensional coefficient of deflection 12 in [305 mm] from center of load plate:

    Compute adjustment factors for d0and l for finite slab size.For both bare concrete and

    composite pavements, the initial estimate of l is used to compute the following adjustment factors

    to d0and l to account for the finite size of the slabs tested:

    ( )est2

    12

    *12

    estd

    dP=k

    ( )[ ]e0.12188=d e

    0.79432-*12

    est-0.07074

    e1.15085-1=AF

    L0.71878-

    d est

    0.80151

    0

    e0.89434-1=AF

    L0.61662-

    est

    1.04831

    where, if the slab length is less than or equal to twice the slab width, L is the square root of the

    product of the slab length and width, both in inches, or if the slab length is greater than twice the

    L*2=L,L*2>Lif

    LL=L,L*2Lif

    !

    !!

    [32]

    [33]

    [31]

    [34]

    [36]

    [35]

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    37/83

    width, L is the product of the square root of two and the slab length in inches:

    Adjust k for finite slab size.For both bare concrete and composite pavements, adjust the

    initially estimated k-value using the following equation:

    Compute mean dynamic k-value.Exclude from the calculation of the mean k-value any

    unrealistic values (i.e., less than 50 psi/in [14 kPa/mm] or greater than 1500 psi/in [407 kPa/mm]),

    as well as any individual values that appear to be significantly out of line with the rest of the

    values.

    L*2=L,L*2>Lif

    LL=L,L*2Lif

    !

    !!

    AFAF

    k=kd

    2

    est

    0

    Compute the estimated mean static k-value for design.Divide the mean dynamic k-value by

    two to estimate the mean static k-value for design.

    A blank worksheet for computation of k from deflection data and example computations of k from

    deflection basins measured on two pavements, one bare concrete and the other composite, are

    given in Table 12.

    Seasonal variation in backcalculated k-values.The design k-value determined from

    backcalculation as described above represents the k-value for the season in which the deflection

    testing was conducted. An agency may wish to conduct deflection testing on selected projects in

    different seasons of the year to assess the seasonal variation in backcalculated k-values for

    different types of subgrades.

    [37]

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    38/83

    Table A2. Determination of design subgrade k-value from deflection measurements.

    BARE CONCRETE PAVEMENT

    Step Equation Calculated Value Example

    d0

    d8

    d12

    d18

    d24

    d36

    d60

    ______________

    ______________

    ______________

    ______________

    ______________

    ______________

    ______________

    0.00418

    0.00398

    0.00384

    0.00361

    0.00336

    0.00288

    0.00205

    AREA7 [26] 45.0

    Initial estimate of l [28] 40.79

    Nondimensional d0*and initial estimate of k

    [31][30]

    0.1237160

    Afd0

    AFl

    [34]

    [35]

    0.867

    0.934

    Adjusted k [37] 212

    Mean dynamic k 212

    Mean static k for design 106

    Table 12.

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    39/83

    COMPOSITE PAVEMENT

    Step Equation Calculated Value Example

    d12

    d18

    d24

    d36

    d60

    ______________

    ____________________________

    ______________

    ______________

    0.00349

    0.003320.00313

    0.00273

    0.00202

    AREA5 [27] 37.8

    Initial estimate of l [29] 48.83

    Nondimensional d12*

    and initial estimate of k

    [33]

    [32]

    0.1189

    128

    Afd0

    AFl

    [34]

    [35]

    0.823

    0.896

    Adjusted k [37] 195

    Mean dynamic k 195

    Mean static k for design 97

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    40/83

    Method C -- Plate Bearing Test Methods.The subgrade or embankment elastic k-value may

    be determined from either of two types of plate bearing tests: repetitive static plate loading

    (AASHTO T221, ASTM D1195) or nonrepetitive static plate loading (AASHTO T222, ASTM

    D1196). These test methods were developed for a variety of purposes, and do not provide explicit

    guidance on the determination of the required k-value input to the design procedure describedhere.

    For the purpose of concrete pavement design, the recommended subgrade input parameter is

    the static elastic k-value. This may be determined from either a repetitive or nonrepetitive test on

    the prepared subgrade or on a prepared test embankment, provided that the embankment is at

    least 10 ft [3 m] thick. Otherwise, the tests should be conducted on the subgrade, and the k-value

    obtained should be adjusted to account for the thickness and density of the embankment, using

    the nomograph provided in Step 3.

    In a repetitive test, the elastic k-value is determined from the ratio of load to elastic

    deformation (the recoverable portion of the total deformation measured). In a nonrepetitive test,

    the load-deformation ratio at a deformation of 0.05 in [1.25 mm] is considered to represent the

    elastic k-value, according to extensive research by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

    Note also that a 30-in-diameter [762-mm-diameter] plate should be used to determine the

    elastic static k-value for use in design. Smaller diameter plates will yield substantially higher k-

    values, which are not appropriate for use in this design procedure. An adequate number of tests

    should be run to ensure coverage over the project length. The mean of the tests becomes the

    static elastic k-value for the season of testing. This value is then used to determine the effective

    seasonally adjusted elastic k-value considering the factors discussed above.

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    41/83

    Season Number of MonthsSubgrade k-Value, Relative Damage

    psi/in millions in the Season

    21.72 0.000019.19 0.0000

    23.12 0.0000

    22.31 0.0000

    Total: 0 Mean Damage:

    Seasonally Adjusted Subgrade k-Value (psi/in): 165

    W18,

    W18

    :

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    42/83

    Adjustment for the Effects of Embankment and/or Shallow Rigid Layer:

    The seasonally adjusted subgrade k-value is to be adjusted using the following nomograph if:(a) fill material will be placed above the natural subgrade, and/or(b) a rigid layer (e.g., bedrock or hardpan clay) is present at a depth of 10 ft or less beneath

    the existing subgrade surface.

    Note: The rigid layer adjustment should only be applied if the subgrade k was determined on the basis of soil type or similar correlations. If the k-value was determined from nondestructive deflection testing or from plate bearing tests, the effect of a rigid layer, if present at a depth of less than 10 ft, is already represented in the k-value obtained.

    Seasonally Adjusted Subgrade k-Value: psi/in

    If required, use the nomograph below to adjust the above subgrade k-value for fill and/or

    rigid layer and enter the adjusted value here:

    psi/in

    Size image for better resolution.

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    43/83

    Traffic Worksheet

    Performance Period: 20 years

    Two-Way Daily Traffic (ADT): 64

    Number of Lanes in Design Direction: 1

    Percent of All Trucks in Design Lane: 100%

    Percent Trucks in Design Direction: 100%

    1 100.0% 4.0% 16.257 0.0% 11.25

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    78

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    um of % ADT: 100.0 Calculated ESALs: 11.25 million

    (Should be 100)

    Vehicle

    Class

    Percent of ADT

    (Total = 100%)

    Annual %

    Growth

    Average Initial

    Truck Factor

    (ESALs/truck)

    Annual %

    Growth in

    Truck Factor

    Accumulated

    ESALs

    (millions)

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    44/83

    Saved Data

    Page 44

    Select row to be exported and click the "Export" button.

    ID Agency: Street Address: City: State:roject Number: Description:Clear

    Example ERES 505 W. University Ave. ChampaignIL 1-20-98LCB Lean Concrete Base, 5-i

    INCO INCO SOROAKO 35391Ramp Access Road

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    45/83

    Saved Data

    Page 45

    Location: nitial Serviceability, P1:erminal Serviceability, P2:

    Champaign, IL 4.5 2.5 700

    Soroako 4.5 2.5 725

    28-day Mean Modulus of Rupture, (S'c)':

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    46/83

    Saved Data

    Page 46

    0.15

    4500000 0.15 25000

    6300000 0.15 1000000

    Elastic Modulus of Slab, Ec: Poisson's Ratio for Concrete,: lastic Modulus of Base, Eb:

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    47/83

    Saved Data

    Page 47

    lab-Base Friction Factor, f:eliability Level (R):

    6 1.4 90 0.34

    19.68 1.4 90 0.3

    esign Thickness of Base, Hb: verall Standard Deviation, S

    0

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    48/83

    Saved Data

    Page 48

    ean Annual Wind Speed, WIND ean Annual Air Temperature, TEMPean Annual Precipitation, PRECIP

    10.2 49.2 33.3

    45 86 25.4

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    49/83

    Saved Data

    Page 49

    Subgrade k-Value ESALs dge Support Factor:Pavement TypeJoint Spacing:Dowel

    1JPCP

    16521.88065817 1JPCP 15 1.5

    200 11.760973 0.94JRCP 26.247

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    50/83

    Saved Data

    Page 50

    Faulting Check Sheet (doweled)

    ase/Slab Friction RestriantTRANGESlab ThicknessBase TypeFI CESAL AGECdDays90

    0.8 6511.2398181822 050021.88065817 20 1 20

    0.8 17.2197178071 0 11.760973

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    51/83

    Saved Data

    Page 51

    Faulting Check Sheet (non doweled) Corner Break Check Sheetill/Rigid Adjustment

    Slab ThicknessBase TypeFI CESAL AGECdGradientTensile Stress top Adjusted k-Value Season1

    11.2398181822 050021.88065817 201.1 1 120 175Fall

    17.2197178071 0 11.760973

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    52/83

    Saved Data

    Page 52

    k-Value Sheet

    Months1k1Season2Months2k2Season3Months3k3Season4Months4k4Season5Months5k5Season6

    2150Winter 3300Spring 380Summer 4120

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    53/83

    Saved Data

    Page 53

    Months6Seasons6erformance Period:wo-Way Daily Traffic (ADT):umber of lanes in Design Direction

    20 8000 2

    20 64 1

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    54/83

    Saved Data

    Page 54

    ercent of All Trucks in Design Laneercent Trucks in Design DirectionADT1GADT1 TF1 GTF1ADT2GADT2

    0.95 0.5 0.65 0.050.004 0.03 0.25 0.06

    1 1 1 0.0416.26 0

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    55/83

    Saved Data

    Page 55

    Traffic Sheet

    TF2GTF2ADT3GADT3TF3GTF3ADT4GADT4TF4GTF4ADT5GADT5TF5GTF5ADT6GADT6TF6

    0.39 0.02 0.1 0.081.62 0.05

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    56/83

    Saved Data

    Page 56

    GTF6ADT7GADT7TF7GTF7ADT8GADT8TF8GTF8ADT9GADT9TF9GTF9ADT10GADT10TF10

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    57/83

    Saved Data

    Page 57

    GTF10ADT11GADT11TF11GTF11ADT12GADT12TF12GTF12ADT13GADT13TF13GTF13

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    58/83

    FI&DAYS90

    Page 58

    SHRP_id State_id State County

    13 1 'la%ama 'L456 3 7873

    79 1 'la%ama CLE0R6E :7 72837

    ;123 1 'la%ama C

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    59/83

    FI&DAYS90

    Page 59

    127= Caliornia 0TTE = ;783;

    :;7; Caliornia C'L'ER'S 1 1822

    2=9 Caliornia EL 600

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    60/83

    FI&DAYS90

    Page 60

    2 9 Colorado P0EL< ;:: 118=9

    1;: 9 Colorado R5< L'6C< 1219 118;:

    313 9 Colorado 4EL 9 1;89

    ;9 3 Connecticut >'RT.'RT.ER6'6< 2 7;89:;7: 12 .lorida >5LLS5LLS

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    61/83

    FI&DAYS90

    Page 61

    =13 1= @eorgia >'LL 7=8::

    =1 1= @eorgia >'R'LSa!aii '05 21832

    17 1 5da*o ''S 32= 138;2

    727 1 5da*o '66'5LT

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    62/83

    FI&DAYS90

    Page 62

    7729 19 5ndiana L' P'LL 9: =38:=

    ;;2 19 5ndiana P =79 ;7892

    ;3 13 5o!a CE'R 111 =:89

    = 13 5o!a CL56T'LL :9: =18;

    2 2 ?an$a$ RE6< ;=3 23813

    3=: 2 ?an$a$ S>'46EE 739 =7822

    13 2 ?an$a$ ST'..

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    63/83

    FI&DAYS90

    Page 63

    297 2; aryland .REER5C? 21: =98;

    2;1 2; aryland >'R.T 191 2:872

    ;== 2: inne$ota '?56@T'LL 1;9 78;

    =9= 29 i$$i$$ippi 'RS>'LL 17 782;

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    64/83

    FI&DAYS90

    Page 64

    79= 29 i$$i$$ippi 'RS>'LL 1:; 78:7

    =92 29 i$$i$$ippi 'RLES 7;2 =:839

    7;: 23 i$$ouri ST LEBE66E 97= 1:8

    ;13 =1 6e%ra$+a '?'LL 37 27829

    =29 =1 6e%ra$+a L'6C'STER :99 =18;

    : =1 6e%ra$+a P>ELPS :;1 22837

    === =1 6e%ra$+a P5ERCE 997 2;8:;1= =2 6evada CL'R? 7 7819

    =1= =2 6evada EL?< 2 7837

    : =2 6evada EL?< 77 8;9

    22: =2 6evada EL?< 9 987

    =1 =2 6evada EL?< 1: 1182:

    12 =2 6evada 56ER'L 2 =89;

    121 =2 6evada 4'S>

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    65/83

    FI&DAYS90

    Page 65

    11 == 6e! >amp$*i ERR5'C? 12: =38:;

    ;;2 =; 6e! Jer$ey 0RL56@T'T>' 1= ;9832

    =9 =: 6ort* CarolinaCLEEL'6 72 ;7819

    1;7 =: 6ort* CarolinaC' 3: ;7899191: =: 6ort* Carolina. 9 ;;87=

    192 =: 6ort* Carolina@R'65LLE 97 ;=83

    2913 =: 6ort* Carolina@05L. 11 ;;8;=

    792: =: 6ort* CarolinaR' 1 ;78:9

    1=72 =: 6ort* CarolinaST'6LB 9 ;987

    792 =: 6ort* CarolinaS0RRB 1:1 ;78291 =: 6ort* Carolina4'?E : ;7811

    72 =9 6ort* a+ota C'SS 2==3 283

    21 =9 6ort* a+ota @R'6 .

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    66/83

    FI&DAYS90

    Page 66

    3 =3

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    67/83

    FI&DAYS90

    Page 67

    17 ;2 Penn$ylvania 60ERL'6 3 ;=81

    119 ;2 Penn$ylvania S' 171 2=8:;

    =7= ; Sout* a+ota PE6656@TER.

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    68/83

    FI&DAYS90

    Page 68

    1;: ;9 Tea$ C'RS'ERS 12 71833

    1113 ;9 Tea$ C>ER

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    69/83

    FI&DAYS90

    Page 69

    113 ;9 Tea$ R0S? 7; ;:8;2

    =9:7 ;9 Tea$ S>ER'6 =9 13822

    19: ;9 Tea$ S5T> 7 ;782

    729: ;9 Tea$ T'RR'6T : =;82

    7=1: ;9 Tea$ T'RR'6T 9 =;837

    72:; ;9 Tea$ T'RR'6T 9 ==893

    729; ;9 Tea$ T'RR'6T 9 =981729= ;9 Tea$ T'RR'6T 9 =:839

    7=1 ;9 Tea$ T'RR'6T 3= =2839

    1: ;9 Tea$ TERRB 1;7 198:7

    1 ;9 Tea$ TR'5S ;: 2:8::

    =7:3 ;9 Tea$ '6 A'6T 9 ;=8;

    =773 ;9 Tea$ 4'L?ER 2: ;789;

    7==; ;9 Tea$ 4>EELER 2; 228=

    =793 ;9 Tea$ 45L'R@ER 1 27831

    7=1 ;9 Tea$ 45SE 9 =:82

    119 ;9 Tea$ 45TTE6E6 17:1 =38:

    1; 7 ermont @R'6 5SLE 1197 =87:

    221 71 irginia C'RRES'PE'?E C5TB :3 ;872

    1;1: 71 irginia .'005ER 29 ;;82:

    12 71 irginia .LE6R5C< 129 ;=8

    73 71 irginia >E6R5C< 1= ;28;2

    79 71 irginia 6

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    70/83

    FI&DAYS90

    Page 70

    191 7= 4a$*ington CL'R? : 9;81

    12 7= 4a$*ington C

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    71/83

    FI&DAYS90

    Page 71

    #A$S%&

    79

    =3

    ;:

    ;1

    79

    =3

    71

    ;2

    7

    ;3

    7

    7

    1:7

    1:=

    1:=

    1:

    93

    :3

    =:

    3

    3=

    111

    111

    1

    =:

    =

    :

    ;

    7

    7

    ;

    77

    7:

    7:

    79

    2

    79

    :1

    7

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    72/83

    FI&DAYS90

    Page 72

    7:

    :=

    1

    1:

    1:11=

    37

    3

    22

    ==

    2

    9:

    17

    1

    11

    3;173

    1;3

    79

    2

    :

    1

    :

    :

    :

    =

    2211

    3

    =2

    23

    :;

    3

    27

    =

    23

    :9

    :9

    ;7

    ==

    ==

    1:

    ;1

    7

    3

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    73/83

    FI&DAYS90

    Page 73

    7

    ;

    2:

    3

    9

    1

    ;2=

    2

    27

    1

    17

    :1

    ;:

    ;1

    77

    7=

    =

    9233

    17

    :

    3:

    7

    7

    9;

    :2

    9:

    2

    11;11;

    11;

    7

    77

    72

    :

    :1

    :2

    =;

    :=

    727

    7;

    :2

    3

    1:

    3;

    2:

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    74/83

    FI&DAYS90

    Page 74

    2

    =9

    9

    ;9

    1

    =;

    ;:33

    9:

    :3

    ;:

    71

    ;

    7

    1

    1

    ;1

    23

    27

    17

    13

    ;7

    1;

    1:

    ;9

    ;

    2

    =2

    ==

    17

    =2

    1

    1

    1;

    13

    19

    17

    =1

    1:

    1:29

    12

    17

    11

    3

    1=

    3

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    75/83

    FI&DAYS90

    Page 75

    1

    12

    1;

    ==

    =;

    =9

    2=12

    =;

    17

    1;

    1=

    12

    =

    2

    17

    11

    11

    1=7

    77

    71

    1

    ;

    29

    =:

    ;1

    2

    =;

    ;

    ==29

    ;

    3

    1;

    12

    29

    =7

    :1

    9=

    =

    =

    22

    1

    1

    2

    =

    2;

    22

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    76/83

    FI&DAYS90

    Page 76

    =1

    =7

    7

    1

    7

    77

    2

    9

    3

    3

    ;

    ;

    ;

    1:

    12

    1212

    12

    11

    :

    ;

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1;

    :1=

    1

    9

    3

    3

    1

    ;3

    7:

    7:

    =9

    =

    7;79

    7;

    73

    79

    7:

    ;3

    ;3

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    77/83

    FI&DAYS90

    Page 77

    ;2

    =

    7=

    77

    7

    :;

    ::

    ;=

    =:

    =9

    =9

    ;2

    27

    27

    27

    27

    7279

    9

    =:

    ;

    =

    =

    =;

    2=

    2;

    :

    29

    292;

    =7

    29

    =

    2=

    2;

    72

    =1

    =;

    =:

    73

    23123

    ;

    ;7

    ;7

    1;

    ;

    =

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    78/83

    FI&DAYS90

    Page 78

    :

    13

    19

    19

    1

    17

    ;:2

    =

    1:

    :7

    :7

    =

    7

    21

    79

    1

    ;7

    2

    7

    ==

    =

    =:

    ;:

    =2

    =

    23=

    ;=

    23

    9

    11

    ;1

    =9

    2=

    ;;

    22:

    1;

    9

    3

    1;

    11

    12

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    79/83

    FI&DAYS90

    Page 79

    9

    11

    11

    12

    7

    2

    73:1

    91

    =

    32

    3

    3

    :

    :=

    :1

    72

    ;

    9

    3

    3

    1;

    ;=

    3

    1

    1

    1

    1=

    29

    222=

    1:

    12

    9

    9

    ;

    12

    1

    1=

    1

    1

    1217

    =

    1

    11

    1;

    17

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    80/83

    FI&DAYS90

    Page 80

    3

    1

    1

    7

    ;;

    77;3

    77

    ;3

    :;

    2=

    7;

    =1

    1;

    7=

    2:

    21

    2=1

    :

    =

    21

    9

    2;

    13

    29

    13

    ;=

    ;2

    21;2

    ;2

    1;

    =3

    2:

    29

    21

    =3

    1:

    97

    97

    12;31

    17

    32

    1

    33

    11=

    73

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    81/83

    FI&DAYS90

    Page 81

    7

    77

    :7

    :;

    :

    12

    1119

    32

    3;

    2

    122

    39

    3;

    37

    99

    17

    :7

    11

    3

    1=

    79

    97

    :

    :2

    ::

    ;

    :1

    11:

    :997

    11

    11=

    1=

    32

    97

    97

    :3

    9:

    11

    :=

    77=

    7

    93

    72

    3

    :2

    :1

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    82/83

    FI&DAYS90

    Page 82

    3

    71

    :7

    93

    3=

    9:

    933

    97

    :9

    12

    :2

    93

    :;

    11

    91

    3

    71

    ==;

    1;

    1

    7:

    ;;

    :7

    ;=

    =

    ;=

    29

    1

    11

    ;

    21

    21

    2

    =

    =7

    =3

    29

    ;9

    7=

    9

    ==

    27

    =7

    =;

    23

    9

  • 7/26/2019 Aashto - Rigid Pavement

    83/83

    FI&DAYS90

    1

    =2

    =

    2

    ;

    ==

    217

    1;

    2

    11

    =1

    2=

    =

    3

    2

    12

    1;

    1;

    12

    12

    1

    9

    =

    :

    :

    9

    12

    1===

    22

    2=

    =;

    19

    ;

    22

    1

    1

    27