a detta a detta, np lockyer, s green, g cruickshank dept neurosurgery, qehb & school of cancer...

23
DETECTION OF CELLULAR BORON IN HUMAN GLIOBLASTOMA BIOPSIES AFTER INFUSION OF BPA A Detta , NP Lockyer, S Green, G Cruickshank Dept Neurosurgery, QEHB & School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham Dept Medical Physics, QEHB & Dept Physics, University of Birmingham Surface Analysis Research Centre, University of Manchester

Upload: tiffany-george

Post on 20-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A Detta A Detta, NP Lockyer, S Green, G Cruickshank Dept Neurosurgery, QEHB & School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham Dept Medical Physics,

DETECTION OF CELLULAR BORON IN HUMAN

GLIOBLASTOMA BIOPSIES AFTER INFUSION OF BPA

A Detta, NP Lockyer, S Green, G Cruickshank

Dept Neurosurgery, QEHB & School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham

Dept Medical Physics, QEHB & Dept Physics, University of Birmingham

Surface Analysis Research Centre, University of Manchester

Page 2: A Detta A Detta, NP Lockyer, S Green, G Cruickshank Dept Neurosurgery, QEHB & School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham Dept Medical Physics,

Why GBM?

Most aggressive tumour known Incurable Causes greatest life-years-lost of any

oncological disease Causes costly morbidity

Page 3: A Detta A Detta, NP Lockyer, S Green, G Cruickshank Dept Neurosurgery, QEHB & School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham Dept Medical Physics,

Why measure cellular boron?

Identify engagement of boronated drug with target tissue

Microscopic locus of boron dictates site of damage

Need 10-fold LESS boron intracellularly than extracellularly to cause cell death

Quantify microdosimetry

Page 4: A Detta A Detta, NP Lockyer, S Green, G Cruickshank Dept Neurosurgery, QEHB & School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham Dept Medical Physics,

Why use SIMS

Best technique available for visualising cellular/subcellular boron

Generates visual images of isotopic composition and distribution

Page 5: A Detta A Detta, NP Lockyer, S Green, G Cruickshank Dept Neurosurgery, QEHB & School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham Dept Medical Physics,

SIMS

High vacuum imaging technique Requires fastidious cryogenic procedures

to preserve chemical and structural integrity of tissue

Cryogenic procedure must obviate processing steps that would cause disturbance of native compartmentalisation of diffusible ions

However, detection limit is ~10ppm

Page 6: A Detta A Detta, NP Lockyer, S Green, G Cruickshank Dept Neurosurgery, QEHB & School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham Dept Medical Physics,

Patient cohorts

1) Intravenous BPA x3 2) Intravenous BPA + BBB-D with

mannitol x3 3) Intracarotid BPA x3 4) Intracarotid + BBB-D with mannitol x1

Page 7: A Detta A Detta, NP Lockyer, S Green, G Cruickshank Dept Neurosurgery, QEHB & School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham Dept Medical Physics,

Needle biopsy taken at 1-2h post BPA of Tumour & BAT

Not readily cryosectionableImprint tissue on Si or glass substrate

Liquid propane: unacceptable riskCryopreserve in isopentane-LN2

SIMS: frozen or freeze-dried

Histology

Bulk 10B quantification:ICP-MS

Store -80 oC

<30s

Page 8: A Detta A Detta, NP Lockyer, S Green, G Cruickshank Dept Neurosurgery, QEHB & School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham Dept Medical Physics,

Pt 1 (IV BPA)Boron Na K

1h BAT 1h Tumour

Page 9: A Detta A Detta, NP Lockyer, S Green, G Cruickshank Dept Neurosurgery, QEHB & School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham Dept Medical Physics,

Pt 1 (IV BPA)

2h BAT 2h Tumour

Page 10: A Detta A Detta, NP Lockyer, S Green, G Cruickshank Dept Neurosurgery, QEHB & School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham Dept Medical Physics,

Pt 2 (IV BPA)

2h BAT 2h Tumour

Page 11: A Detta A Detta, NP Lockyer, S Green, G Cruickshank Dept Neurosurgery, QEHB & School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham Dept Medical Physics,

Pt 3 (IV BPA)

2h Tumour

Page 12: A Detta A Detta, NP Lockyer, S Green, G Cruickshank Dept Neurosurgery, QEHB & School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham Dept Medical Physics,

Pt 4 (IV BPA + BBB-D)

2h BAT 2h Tumour

Page 13: A Detta A Detta, NP Lockyer, S Green, G Cruickshank Dept Neurosurgery, QEHB & School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham Dept Medical Physics,

Pt 5 (IV BPA + BBB-D)

2h BAT 2h Tumour

Page 14: A Detta A Detta, NP Lockyer, S Green, G Cruickshank Dept Neurosurgery, QEHB & School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham Dept Medical Physics,

Pt 6 (IV BPA + BBB-D)

2h BAT 2h Tumour

Page 15: A Detta A Detta, NP Lockyer, S Green, G Cruickshank Dept Neurosurgery, QEHB & School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham Dept Medical Physics,

Pt 7 (IA BPA)

2h BAT 2h Tumour

Page 16: A Detta A Detta, NP Lockyer, S Green, G Cruickshank Dept Neurosurgery, QEHB & School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham Dept Medical Physics,

Pt 8 (IA BPA)

2h BAT 2h Tumour

Page 17: A Detta A Detta, NP Lockyer, S Green, G Cruickshank Dept Neurosurgery, QEHB & School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham Dept Medical Physics,

Pt 9 (IA BPA)

2h BAT 2h Tumour

Page 18: A Detta A Detta, NP Lockyer, S Green, G Cruickshank Dept Neurosurgery, QEHB & School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham Dept Medical Physics,

Pt 10 (IA BPA + BBB-D)

Analysis pending

Page 19: A Detta A Detta, NP Lockyer, S Green, G Cruickshank Dept Neurosurgery, QEHB & School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham Dept Medical Physics,

Patients/Groups

Pt No. Age/gender

Diagnosis BPA infusion module

1 73/M OAII? IV

2 54/F GBM IV

3 55/M GBM IV

4 66/F GBM IV+BBBD

5 70/M GBM IV+BBBD

6 51/M GBM IV+BBBD

7 57/M GBM IA

8 72/M GBM IA

9 57/M GBM IA

10 71/M GBM IA+BBBD

Page 20: A Detta A Detta, NP Lockyer, S Green, G Cruickshank Dept Neurosurgery, QEHB & School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham Dept Medical Physics,

Preliminary ResultsBPA infusion module

SIMS B:C ratio ICP-MS (ppm)

T BAT T BAT

1. IV 0.04 (1)

0.03 (1)

6.6 5.2

2. IV 0.08 (3)

0.08 (3)

47 18

3. IV 0.04 (2)

NA 8.6 9.4

4. IV+BBBD 0.03 (2)

0.02 (2)

23.2 14.4

5. IV+BBBD 0.04 (1)

0.01 (1)

22.2 9.9

6. IV+BBBD 0.04 (1)

0.02 (1)

18.4 16.9

7. IA 0.08 (2)

0.10 (2)

32.2 13.7

8. IA 0.05 (2)

0.02 (2)

22.1 13.9

9. IA 0.04 (3)

0.03 (3)

17.8* 10.4

Page 21: A Detta A Detta, NP Lockyer, S Green, G Cruickshank Dept Neurosurgery, QEHB & School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham Dept Medical Physics,

Results summary 1BPA

infusion

module

SIMS B/C ratio

T B

ICP-MS (ppm)

T B

IV 0.05+ 0.02

0.06+ 0.035

20.7+ 22.8

10.9+ 6.5

IV+BBBD

0.05+ 0.026

0.02+ 0.006

21.3+ 2.5

13.7+ 3.5

IA0.06+ 0.02

0.05+ 0.04

24.0+ 7.4

12.7+ 2.0

Page 22: A Detta A Detta, NP Lockyer, S Green, G Cruickshank Dept Neurosurgery, QEHB & School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham Dept Medical Physics,

Results summary 2BPA infusion

moduleT:B SIMS boron

T:B ICP-MS boron

IV 0.8 1.9

IV+BBBD 2.5 1.6

IA 1.2 1.9

Page 23: A Detta A Detta, NP Lockyer, S Green, G Cruickshank Dept Neurosurgery, QEHB & School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham Dept Medical Physics,

Conclusions

Cell-level boron can be measured in human GBM biopsies with SIMS

IA route possibly route of choice for optimal target engagement at tissue and cell-level dimensions

Tumour : BAT boron levels independent of route of infusion

SIMS suggests tumour boron levels a little higher than BAT whereas ICP-MS shows ~2-fold difference