9.3_site-specific controller evaluation using hil_pratt_epri/snl microgrid symposium
TRANSCRIPT
Site-specific controller evaluation using HILAnnabelle Pratt
EPRI/Sandia Symposium on Secure and Resilient Microgrids
August 30, 2016
2
IdahoNREL
Lawrence Berkeley
Lawrence LivermoreLos AlamosSandia
Pacific Northwest
Argonne BrookhavenNETL
Oak Ridge
NNSA (Defense Program) Office of Science Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy Office of Nuclear Energy Office of Fossil Energy
NREL is Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy by The Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC
http://energy.gov/maps/doe-national-laboratories
3
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
• Only national laboratory Dedicated to Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency R&D• Research ranges from
Fundamental Science to Technology Solutions• Collaboration with Industry and
University partners is a hallmark
3
Main Campus in Golden, CO
Distributed Energy Research and Test Facility (DERTF) at the National Wind Technology Center (NWTC) in Boulder, CO
ESIF
4
ESIF Laboratories
Smart buildings & controllable loads
Power Systems IntegrationGrid Simulators - Microgrids
Energy SystemsIntegration Fuel Cells, Electrolyzers
Outdoor Test AreasEVs, Power Transformers
Rooftop PV Energy Storage - Residential, Community& Grid Battery Storage,Flywheels & Thermal
HPC & Data Center
Advanced Distribution
Management Systems
5
• The microgrid must comply with the distribution system operator’s interconnection requirementso Most utilities in the U.S. refer to IEEE 1547
Microgrid control system objectives
Source: siemens.com
6
• The role of the microgrid control system is to manage the microgrid assets so as to meet the interconnection requirements
Microgrid control system objectives, cont’d
Source: siemens.com
• The IEEE 2030.7 draft standard “provides the specification of microgrid control system in terms of the functional requirements for interconnection”
7
• Single product complianceo Does it meet IEEE 2030.7 core level functions?o Does it meet additional customer requirements?
• Product comparisono How do these controllers compare?
Requires testing in the context of a microgrid system
• Site-specific complianceo Is it capable of managing this microgrid’s assets in
order to meet these interconnection requirements?
Objectives of microgrid controller evaluation
8
Pure simulationAbstract or real-timeNeed to integrate MGC
Microgrid Controller Test Options
CHILInterface real controllerReal-time simulationMGC
DER G
EPS
MGC
DER G
EPS
MGC
DER G
EPS
MGC
DER G
CHIL = Controller Hardware-in-the-Loop; PHIL = Power Hardware-in-the-LoopMGC = Microgrid controller; DER = Distributed Energy Resource; G = Generator; EPS = Electric Power System
CHIL & PHILInterface real controller and assetsPower interface, more complex
PowerReal controller and assetsSimple EPS model
9
• Model of site EPSo transient simulation*
o possible model reduction• Actual or representative DER
o reduce modeling inaccuracieso proprietary controls
• Flexible scenarioso Worst case testingo No customer impact
CHIL & PHIL for site-specific evaluation
MGC
DER G
EPS
GDAC GGS GTxfr
YVsec
HTxfrHCTHADC
ZSub Zgs
+
+
++
VSub
IInv
VESS VGS VPri VSec
IPri +-IESS
kV
kI-1
Virtual Feeder Interface Hardware
GComp
HComp
* RTDS, Opal-RT, Speedgoat
10
CHIL/PHIL Test Example 1• PHIL & CHIL evaluation of microgrid controller for
Buffalo Niagra Medical Campus (BNMC) site o Project lead: EPRI
• DOE FOA 997 functional requirements • CHIL: Spirae Wave controller• PHIL: ESS inverter (representative)
11
NREL Test Setup for BNMC
12
CHIL/PHIL Test Example 2
• PHIL & CHIL evaluation of microgrid controller for Borrego Springs community microgrid site
• California Energy Commission (CEC) awarded $5M to SDG&E to connect Borrego Springs microgrid to a 26 MW PV plant o enables the entire community to operate solely on renewable energy
Source: SDG&E
13
Borrego Springs controller evaluation
• CHIL: Spirae Wave controller & Generator controller
• PHIL: ESS inverter (representative) & SMA PV inverter (actual)
• Functional requirements similar to FOA 997
• PV plant load-following mode
14
• Site-specific controller evaluation:• Can the controller manage this microgrid’s assets in
order to meet these interconnection requirements?
• NREL’s Power and Controller Hardware-in-the-Loop (PHIL & CHIL) test platform allows multiple scenario testing with actual or representative power hardware
Summary
Thank You!!
Annabelle Pratt, Ph.D.Principal Engineer
Power Systems Engineering CenterNational Renewable Energy Laboratory
16
Borrego Springs controller evaluation
• Remote HIL: o Connect to SDG&E ITFo Avoids resource duplication
17
DOE 997: Functional Requirements
1. Disconnectiono disconnect time based on voltage & frequency
2. Resynchronization and Reconnectiono frequency, voltage and phase angle difference
3. Steady-State Frequency Range, Voltage Range, and Power Quality
4. Protectiono external & internal faults; unintentional islanding
5. Dispatcho survivability, economic and environmental performance
6. Enhanced Resilienceo meet community-defined resilience objectives