4th technical meeting - wp6

Project SLOPE1

WP 6 – System integration

Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16


Agenda

• WP6 Status • T.6.02

– Overview (integration, timeline, components)

• T.6.03– Overview– Modules interactions– Update by each partner– General questions and Issues– Action plan


WP6 Overview - Goals

• Build a working system

• Ready for pilots and on-the-field testing

• 3 Main tasks:• First Integration - Forest Inventory & Harvesting

System • Second Integration - Forest Management• Third Integration – System Validation

• Technical and Economical Analysis • Overall solution costs• Social impacts• Environmental impacts

T.6.2

T.6.3

T.6.4


WP6 Overview - ProccessWaterfall + agile like approach• 3 major loops of integration and lab validation• 4 minor loops of iterative evolution• Bug fixing and integration at high frequency• Parallel support for real use case pilots

T.6.2

T.6.3

T.6.4


WP6 Overview – T.6.02 Components


WP6 Overview – T.6.02 Timeline

• 4 agile-like integration sprints (bimonthly)• 2 sprint overlapping with step 2

• 1 monitoring meeting every 2 weeks• 1 Round of testing at the end of each sprint

• Incremental built of D.6.02.1 Report • Incremental build of D.6.04.1

→ 5 Completed

→ Done → Done→ Final review→ Done


WP6 Overview – T.6.02 Integration

1. Connection of the 3D modelling for harvesting planning (T.2.4) with the FIS• [100%] Still some stuff to be finalized

2. Connection of handheld devices (e.g. TREE and MHG) with the FIS• [100%] MHG• [100%] Treemetrics

3. Connection of cable crane and processor head enhanced HW with the FIS• [100%] Cable crane connection with the Harvester Industrial PC• [50%] Industrial PC connection with the FIS

4. Connection of truck control units with the FIS• [100%] Ready

5. Connection of planning and editing functionalities already available in the 3Dmodelling for harvesting planning system with the FIS• [75%] Analytics tools depend strongly on data availability




• 1 Virtual meeting every 2 weeks• 1 Round of testing at the end of each sprint

• Incremental built of D.6.02.2 Report II• Incremental build of D.6.04.2

→ 2 Done

→ Done→ Done→ To be done→ To be done


WP6 Overview – T.6.03 - Integration

1. Refinement of already existing Web services to access the FIS• [75%] Work in progress

2. Development of new Web Services / Adapters to cope with onlinepurchasing/invoicing, real-time operation control and logistic optimization• [??%] System still under development

3. Connection of purchasing/invoicing system with the FIS• [??%] System still under development

4. Connection of real-time operation control system with the FIS

• [??%] Prototypes still under construction


T.6.3 Overview

• TBD


T.6.3 Overview

• Modules interaction


T.6.3 Partners update

• CNR• ITENE• MHG• Treemetrics• Greifenberg• BOKU


T.6.3 Questions and Issues

• ITENE• Should we need to know something in particular within the trucks tracking system?

• In the test data the speed field is always 0, is it correct?

• TREE• How often is it updated the SLOPE db from your system?

• MHG• We need a new logs table (identical to the original one) in which to store the new

information generated by CNR.

• It could be usefull to add a new field in the user_account to connect the user to hisreal estates.


T.6.3 Questions and Issues

• CNR• Plan to complete Industrial PC <-> FIS communication

• Greifenberg• We need to update the rope launcher formula based on your launch table.

• BOKU


T.6.3 Action Plan

• Ready by 15 Jul:• GT/ITENE: Test and visualization of truck movements

• Item 2

• Ready by 29 Jul:• CNR: Upload/Download data from Labview and the FIS

• Item 2

• Ready by 12 Aug:• Item 1

• Item 2

• Ready by 2 Sep:• Item 1

• Item 2


T.6.3 Action Plan


• Item 2


• Item 2

• Ready by 14 Oct:• Item 1

• Item 2

• Ready by 28 Oct:• Item 1

• Item 2


Thanks

GRAPHITECH

[email protected]@graphitech.it

Fondazione GraphitechVia Alla Cascata 56C38123 Trento (ITALY)

Phone: +39 0461.283395Fax: +39 0461.283398

mailto:[email protected]


SLOPEIntegrated proceSsing and controL systems fOr sustainable forest Production in mountain arEas


WORK PACKAGE 6: SYSTEM INTEGRATION

FONDAZIONE GRAPHITECH

THEME: Integrated processing and Control Systems forSustainable Production in Farms and ForestsDuration: 36 MonthsPartners: 10Coordinating institution: Fondazione GraphiTech


Agenda

• Work Package Goals• Tasks and Roles Overview• Timeline• Deliverables• Task Details

• Task 6.02 Results• Task 6.03 Status

• Action plan• Open Discussion


Work Package Key aspects

T.6.2

T.6.3

T.6.4

• Build a working system

• Ready for pilots and on-the-field testing

• 3 Main tasks:• First Integration - Forest Inventory & Harvesting

System • Second Integration - Forest Management• Third Integration – System Validation

• Technical and Economical Analysis • Overall solution costs• Social impacts• Environmental impacts


Tasks and Roles

• T.6.1 Definition of integration Steps• Task leader: GRAPHITECH; Participants: MHG, FLY, ITENE

• T.6.2 First Integration - Forest inventory & harvesting systems• Task leader: GRAPHITECH; Participants: MHG, FLY, GRE, TRE, ITENE, COM, CNR

• T.6.3 Second integration – Forest management• Task leader: MHG; Participants: CNR, BOKU, GRE, TRE, ITENE

• T.6.4 – Third integration - System validation• Task leader: GRAPHITECH; Participants: COM, MHG, BOKU, FLY, GRE, TRE, ITENE

• T.6.5 – Scientific Coordination• Task leader: GRAPHITECH;

2014 2015 2016

J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36

WP 6 System Integration

T.6.1 Definition of the integration steps

T.6.2 First Integration – Forest inventory & harvesting systems

T.6.3 Second integration – Forest management

T.6.4 Third integration -System validation

T.6.5 Scientific coordination


Timeline, Deliverables, Milestone, Project Meetings

D.6.01 System Integration and Validation Plan

D.6.021 System Integration Report ID.6.041 SLOPE System Techno-Economic Evaluation Report I

D.6.022 System Integration Report IID.6.042 SLOPE System Techno-Economic Evaluation Report II

D.6.023 System Integration Report IIID.6.043 SLOPE System Techno-Economic Evaluation Report III

MS04 SLOPE System Integration Planning is completed

MS05 Forest Inventory and Intelligent Harvesting system integration

MS07 Forest Management system integrated

MS09 System testing endingD.6.03 SLOPE System Field Trials Readiness Assessment Report

Technical MeetingsReview MeetingDeliverableMilestone

2014 2015 2016

J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36

WP 6 System Integration

T.6.1 Definition of the integration steps

T.6.2 First Integration – Forest inventory & harvesting systems

T.6.3 Second integration – Forest management

T.6.4 Third integration -System validation

T.6.5 Scientific coordination


Timeline, Deliverables, Milestone, Project Meetings

D.6.01 System Integration and Validation Plan

D.6.021 System Integration Report I

D.6.022 System Integration Report IID.6.042 SLOPE System Techno-Economic Evaluation Report II

D.6.023 System Integration Report IIID.6.043 SLOPE System Techno-Economic Evaluation Report III

MS04 SLOPE System Integration Planning is completed

MS05 Forest Inventory and Intelligent Harvesting system integration

MS07 Forest Management system integrated

MS09 System testing endingD.6.03 SLOPE System Field Trials Readiness Assessment Report

Technical MeetingsReview MeetingDeliverableMilestone

D.6.041 SLOPE System Techno-Economic Evaluation Report I


Deliverables

• D. 6.01 System Integration and Validation Plan (M16) – Submitted M18• Integration and validation procedures and timeline to validate the SLOPE system• Based on the use cases in WP1

• D.6.03 SLOPE System Field Trials Readiness Assessment Report (M36)• Assessment of the initial user experience and recommendations for the field trials

operations. • Guidance and system operation manual for the Field Trials operators


Deliverables

• D. 6.021 System Integration Report I (M27) – Completed at M30• Integration test and validation concept procedures results • Assessment of the initial user experience• Recommendations for field trials operations

• D 6.022 System Integration Report II (M31) – Expected at M33• Integration test and validation concept procedures results (rev. 2)• Assessment of the initial user experience (rev. 2)• Recommendations for field trials operations (rev. 2)

• D 6.023 System Integration Report III (M34)• Integration test and validation concept procedures results (rev. 3)• Assessment of the initial user experience (rev. 3)• Recommendations for field trials operations (rev. 3)


Deliverables

• D6.041 SLOPE System Techno-Economic Evaluation Report I (M27) Submitted M28 • Analysis of technical and economical aspects of SLOPE system • Current practices and the potential known alternatives comparison• Estimation phase

• D6.042 SLOPE System Techno-Economic Evaluation Report II (M31) Expected M32 • Analysis of technical and economical aspects of SLOPE system • Current practices and the potential known alternatives comparison• Preliminary results phase

• D6.043 SLOPE System Techno-Economic Evaluation Report III (M34): • Analysis of technical and economical aspects of SLOPE system • Current practices and the potential known alternatives comparison• Final results phase


Deliverables Progress

100

90

20

0 0

100

0 00

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

D.6.

01 S

yste

min

tegr

atio

n an

dva

lidat

ion

plan

D.6.

021

Syst

emin

tegr

atio

n re

port

1

D.6.

022

Syst

emin

tegr

atio

n re

port

2

D.6.

023

Syst

emin

tegr

atio

n re

port

3

D.6.

3 Sy

stem

fiel

dtr

ials

read

ines

sas

sess

men

t rep

ort

D.6.

041

Tech

no-

econ

omic

eval

uatio

n re

port

1

D.6.

042

Tech

no-

econ

omic

eval

uatio

n re

port

2

D.6.

043

Tech

no-

econ

omic

eval

uatio

n re

port

3

Deliverables Status


Tasks Overview


Task 6.1 – Definition of the integration steps

• Status: Completed (100%)• Length: 7 Months (From M10 to M16)• 5 Involved Partners

• Leader: GraphiTech• Participants: COMPOLAB, MHG, FLY, ITENE

• Aim: Achieve a complete integration of the different components that are part of the SLOPE platform to be tested on pilot areas

• Output: • D.6.01 System integration and validation plan


Integration Strategy

Waterfall + agile like approach• 3 major loops of integration and lab validation• 4 minor loops of iterative evolution• Bug fixing and integration at high frequency• Parallel support for real use case pilots

T.6.2

T.6.3

T.6.4

For each main integration step:• Involved components• Timeline (integration steps,

milestones, telcos, days for testing)• One testing scenario• Involved actors • HW and SW requirements• Functional requirements

• defining a function• Non-functional requirements

• defining a criteria for an operation• Testing approach


Task 6.2 – First integration: forest inventory and harvesting systems

• Status: Completed (100%)• Length: 14 Months (From M14 to M27)• 8 Involved Partners

• Leader: GraphiTech• Participants: COMPOLAB, MHG, FLY, GRE, TRE, ITENE, CNR

• Aim: • Integration of forest information system (FIS) with harvesting

measurement systems and software components

• Output: • D.6.21 System integration report I • D.6.41 SLOPE System Techno-Economic Evaluation Report I


Task 6.2 - Effort• GraphiTech

• 3D Harvesting planner improvements (alpha 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7)• Banana Pro board software development for cable carriage• Integration coordination (Telcos, reports, etc.)

• MHG• FIS improvements, adaptations, extension (e.g. new tables for CNR)

• TREE• On the field App• Back-end development for on field app• Upload of tree marking operations on the FIS

• ITENE• Intelligent truck system finalization


Task 6.2 - Effort• Greifenberg

• Tecno PLC Programming• Definition of CAN Bus protocol communications• Installation of Banana Pro Board

• CNR• Industrial PC programming for data acquisition on the harvester

• COMPOLAB• Industrial PC installation and configuration


Alpha 1.0 – 1.4 Features

• Cable crane planning, profiling and animation• Rope launcher easer visualization of target coordinates and

cable length• Database Stands visualization • Trees visualization and spatial queries in Sover• Multilanguage support (Italian, German, English)• 3D moving objects along a path • Authentication• Workspace saving• Pilot test sites Map and Vector data• Legend for all datasets• Automatic PDF Report generation• Compass • GPS positioning


Alpha 1.5 - Features• Stand selection• Tree metadata inspector• Tree status highlight and editing• Tree status update into database• User notifications• Harvesting plan update into database• Annaberg multi-resolution terrain • Points of interest (Gas stations)


Alpha 1.6 - Features• Import, Export and Update of Tree and Logs dataset directly from the web• Building & Terminals data inspector• Integration of Biomass center for the Austrian area• Log visualization• Log metadata inspector with color highlight• Truck data visualization (ITENE test data)• Bug fixes and optimizations


Alpha 1.7 - Features• HTTPS protocol for WP5 integration• Working Area setup with machines and notes• Spatial Queries with data analytics• Annaberg Opendata integration• Bug fixes and optimizations


Video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMSuevGyDJU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMSuevGyDJU


Alpha 1.8 Upcoming Features

• Truck data visualization in pilots area• Integration of algorithms to maximize the profit (BOKU)• Improvement of cable way planning (angles)• Possibility to save more than one workspace for each user• Storage areas monitoring• Support for the communication with the purchasing/invoicing

platform• Refinements base on users’ feedbacks

Technical Meeting 19-21 Jan 16

WP6 Partners effort




• 1 monitoring meeting every 2 weeks• 1 Round of testing at the end of each sprint

• Incremental built of D.6.02.1 Report • Incremental build of D.6.04.1

→ 4 Completed

→ Done → Done→ Final review→ Done


WP6 Overview – T.6.02 Integration

1. Connection of the 3D modelling for harvesting planning (T.2.4) with the FIS• [100%] Still some stuff to be finalized

2. Connection of handheld devices (e.g. TREE and MHG) with the FIS• [100%] MHG• [100%] Treemetrics

3. Connection of cable crane and processor head enhanced HW with the FIS• [100%] Cable crane connection with the Harvester Industrial PC• [50%] Industrial PC connection with the FIS

4. Connection of truck control units with the FIS• [100%] Ready

5. Connection of planning and editing functionalities already available in the 3Dmodelling for harvesting planning system with the FIS• [75%] Analytics tools depend strongly on data availability


Task 6.02 – Functional Requirements

4 Operation4.1 Cableway planning HIGH4.1.1 Add/Remove pillars HIGH

4.1.2 Show harvesting area HIGH

4.1.3 Show cable information (angles, height from terrain, length)

HIGH

4.1.4 Show cable line profile MEDIUM

4.2 Working area setup4.2.1 Draw working area HIGH

4.2.2 Place harvesting machines HIGH

4.2.3 Place other resources HIGH

4.2.4 Plan routes MEDIUM

4.3 Track felling activities MEDIUM4.4 Toggle building and terminals visualization MEDIUM4.5 Track logistics MEDIUM4.5.1 Show truck movements MEDIUM

4.5.2 Track wood storage areas MEDIUM

4.5.3 Track sawmills MEDIUM

4.5.4 Show logs inventory MEDIUM

4.6 Track harvesting progress HIGH4.6.1 Real-time updates and statistics MEDIUM

4.7 Show weather conditions and forecast HIGH

• 101 Test Cases for T.6.02- Test Number- Interface (desktop, mobile, vehicle)- Preconditions- Test case description- Expected result- Obtained result- Anomaly- Performed- Passed

• 5 Validations done out of 5• 2 days of work for each validation• Test of each requirement in laboratory conditions• Threshold to be reached 70%


Testing Results

34

4453 55

65

7

5

1111

560

52

37 3531

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Validation 1 Validation 2 Validation 3 Validation 4 Validation 5

Test

Cas

es

Validations

NotPerformed

Failed

Passed


Task 6.02 – Non-Functional Requirements

Forest Information System (FIS)1 User friendliness HIGH2 Compatibility with all the desktop browsers HIGH3 Compatibility with mobile browsers MEDIUM4 Cross platform HIGH5 Dynamic interface MEDIUM

Mobile scenario

6Easy identification of virtually marked trees on the field HIGH

7 GPS signal should work in the forest MEDIUM8 Offline fault tolerance MEDIUM

In-vehicle scenario8 Offline fault tolerance MEDIUM

Usability questionnaires• Based on ISO 9241 recommendations covering

ergonomics of human-computer interaction• User details• Application test questionnaire: Overall system and

ergonomics, Testing scenario, Overall use of the interface, Expectations for implementation in final SLOPE Forest information system

• Isometric tests: Suitability for the task, Self-descriptiveness, Controllability, Conformity with user expectations, Error tolerance, Suitability for individualization, Suitability for learning


Usability Questionnaire


Preliminary results - Profiles

Professional Profile

Developer Researcher

Age Range

18 - 24 25 - 34 35 - 44

Platform

Desktop Mobile In-vehicle

0,00

1,00

2,00

3,00

4,00

5,00

6,00

Aerial andsatellite image

analysis

Forest planningand simulation

software

Harvestingplanning

Tree marking Tree felling andextraction

Tree processing Logs pillingstocking and

transport

Wood auctionand selling

Experience


Preliminary results - Application

0,00

1,00

2,00

3,00

4,00

5,00

6,00 Overal system & Ergonomics



0,00

1,00

2,00

3,00

4,00

5,00

6,00

Feedback timeis adequate(e.g. after I

select an optionthe consequent

action occurswith little or no

delay)

Processing timeis adequate

I haveexperienced no

time delayduring the

working session

There is someform of system

feedback forevery action

The interface isuser-friendly

The systemfeatures a

consistent icondesign scheme

and stylistictreatment

The colorschemas of the

interface areproperlychosen

The currentstatus of the

system isclearly

indicated at alltimes

The interface isconsistentduring thedifferentfunctions

Excessive detailin interface

design has beenavoided

The results aredisplayed

clearly andunderstandably

The resultsdisplayedcontain allimportant

information

The floatingmenu interface

is easy tounderstand

Scenario of the test



0,00

1,00

2,00

3,00

4,00

5,00

6,00

It is easy to accessforest information

resources

It is easy tovisualise

information fromtrees and stems

The display of 3Dterrain helped meto understand the

specificcharacteristics of

on the stand

The display of 3Dcable line helpedme to improve its

positioning

It is easy toaggregate forest

production data ofa specific area

It is easy to accessterrain

measurementsand slope data

Menus are wellrepresentative of

the kind ofinformation they

can provide

Access to data



0,00

1,00

2,00

3,00

4,00

5,00

6,00

I expect to beable to jump

betweenfunctionalities

more freely

I expect a 3Denviroment

reconstructionmore accurate

in terms ofaerial pictures



in terms ofdigital

elevationmodel



in terms offorest model

I expect a moreprecise control

of the cableline placement

I expect a moreprecise control

the workingarea setup

I expect a moreprecise tracking

of movingobjects

I expect to beable to setup

more than onecable line at

the same time

I expect to beable to do

more accurateanalysis on thewood product

I expect to havemore

informationabout the

produced wood

Expectations for implementation in final SLOPE Forest information system


Preliminary results - Ergonomics

0,00

1,00

2,00

3,00

4,00

5,00

6,00

The softwareforces me to

perform tasksthat are not

related to myactual work

The softwarelets me

completelyperform entirework routines

The functionsimplemented in

the softwaresupport me inperforming my

work

I perceive thearrangement of

the elementson-screen as

sensible for thework I do withthe software

Too manydifferent steps

need to beperformed todeal with the

given task

The way inwhich data is

output is suitedto the tasks I

want to performwith thesoftware

The software iswell suited to

therequirements of

my work

In a given screenI find all the

information Ineed in that

situation

The conventionused in the

software reflectsthat of my

environment

The softwareprovides mewith a repeatfunction for

work steps thatmust be

performedseveral times in

succession

I can easilyadapt the

software forperforming new

tasks

The importantcommandsrequired toperform my

work are easy tofind

I am able toadjust the

presentation ofresults (on thescreen) to myvarious workrequirements

Thepresentation ofthe informationon the screen

supports me inperforming my

work

Suitability for the task



0,00

1,00

2,00

3,00

4,00

5,00

6,00

I can call upspecific

explanationsfor the use ofthe system, if

necessary

I understandimmediately

what is meantby the

informationdisplayed bythe software

It is easy toretrieve

informationabout a certain

entry field

When menuitems are notavailable in

certainsituations, thisfact is visually

communicatedto me

If I want, thesoftware willdisplay not

only generalexplanation

but alsoconcrete

examples toillustrate

points

Theexplanations

that thesoftware gives

me clearlyrefer to the

specificsituations in

which they areoutput

If I want, thesoftware

displays basicinformation

aboutconceptual

aspects of theprogram

The softwareprovides mewith enoughinformationabout whichentries are

permitted in aparticularsituation

I can tellstraight away

whichfunctions are

invoked by thevarious menu

items

The conceptsused in the

software areclear and

unambiguous

The softwarealways visually

marks thecurrent entry

location

I can easily tellthe difference

amongfeedback

messages,requests to

confirm inputsor commands,warnings, and

errormessages.

Self descriptiveness



0,00

1,00

2,00

3,00

4,00

5,00

6,00

I need a long time tolearn how to use

the software

It is easy for me torelearn how to usethe software after alengthy interruption

The explanationsprovided help meunderstand the

software so that Ibecome more and

more skilled at usingit

So far I have not hadany problems in

learning the rulesfor communicatingwith the software

I was able to use thesoftware right from

the beginning bymyself, without

having to askcoworkers for help

I feel encouraged bythe software to try

out new systemfunctions by trial

and error

In order to use thesoftware properly I

must remembermany details

I find it easy to usethe commands

Suitability for learning


T.6.02 Conclusions

• Good integration between mobile and desktop software with the forest information system (FIS)

• Test cases almost in line with the plan• Good usability feedbacks

• Machines communication needs to be improved• More users’ feedbacks needed on different platforms




• 1 Virtual meeting every 2 weeks• 1 Round of testing at the end of each sprint

• Incremental built of D.6.02.2 Report II• Incremental build of D.6.04.2

→ 2 Done

→ Done→ Done→ To be done→ To be done


WP6 Overview – T.6.03 - Integration

1. Refinement of already existing Web services to access the FIS• [75%] Work in progress

2. Development of new Web Services / Adapters to cope with onlinepurchasing/invoicing, real-time operation control and logistic optimization• [90%] Almost ready

3. Connection of purchasing/invoicing system with the FIS• [90%] Almost ready

4. Connection of real-time operation control system with the FIS

• [25%] Prototype still under construction

34

4453 55

65

807

5

1111

5

0

6052

37 3531

21

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Validation 1 Validation 2 Validation 3 Validation 4 Validation 5 Validation 6

Test

Cas

es

Validations

NotPerformed

Failed

Passed


Testing Results


Conclusions and Remedial Actions

• T.6.02 Completed

• Delay with the integration of the forest management software

• Test cases to be extended

• Still a lot of integration work pending

• Action plan (bimonthly goals) for the upcoming months defined


T.6.3 Action Plan

• Ready by 15 Jul:• GT/ITENE: Test and visualization of truck movements

• GT/BOKU: New features for planning

• Ready by 29 Jul:• CNR: Upload/Download data from Labview and the FIS

• GT/BOKU: First implementation of T.5.04 Models

• Ready by 12 Aug:• MHG: Progress for the IPTIM/Woodland Manager integration

• Ready by 2 Sep:• MHG: Progress for the IPTIM/Woodland Manager integration


Open Discussion


Thank you for your attention

DANIELE MAGLIOCCHETTI

[email protected]

Fondazione GraphitechVia Alla Cascata 56C38123 Trento (ITALY)

Phone: +39 0461.283395Fax: +39 0461.283398


Project SLOPE

WP6 T6.3 – Second integration

Forest managementTrento, 5th July, 2016

Technical Meeting5 Jul 16

Overview


• Status: In progress (85%)• Length: 10 Months (From M22 to M31)• Involved Partners

• Leader: MHG• Participants: CNR, BOKU, GRE, TRE, ITENE

• Aim: Integrate the results of on-field data collection into the forest management system including the analysis resulting from WP4

• Output: D6.022 System Integration Report II

Objectives

• Specify integration points and adapters• Develop FIS Web Service module to handle all transactions

and connections• Connection of sales platform with the FIS• Connection of real-time operation control system with the

FIS• Develop adapters • Test integration points• Integrate user interfaces• Make report about the integration phase (System

Integration Report II)


Timeline

M22 M23 M24 M25 M26 M27 M28 M29 M30 M31 M32 M33

Virtual meetings every 2 weeks

Report and taskready


Specification Implementation & Testing

Deliverable overview


Deliverable overview


User Interface(Entry point)

(Graphitech)3D Harvesting planner

SLOPE FISWeb Service(+Adapters)

GraphitechServices

MHG Services

TreemetricsServices

(MHG) Online salesplatform


Data Integration

JSON Data

SLOPE FISWeb Service

SLOPE FIS Database

IntegrationAdapters

Treemetrics

MHG

• Specify integration points• Specify and implement adapters for data communication between different

services if needed• Extend SLOPE FIS Web Service when needed• Finnish Forest XML standard adapter implemented for MHG service integration


User Interface Integration

User Interface

SLOPE FIS Database

Web App 1

Web App 2

• Use light weight model to integrate web user interfaces to single entry point

• Implement SLOPE FIS integration app for user interface integration • Use SLOPE FIS database for user management• Iframe or link/tab integration

Auth

Web App 3


User Interface Integration

Summary

• Basic prototype of integrations implemented• Task is little bit late because we are waiting Iptim optimization tool

integration• One integration adapter implemented for export data from the slope

database to the online sales platform and Iptim optimization tool• Virtual meetings every two weeks• User interface fixes and more automation will be implemented• Report need to be completed• Goal is to finalize this task on September 2016



Contact info

Veli-Matti Plosila [email protected]

Seppo Huurinainen [email protected]

Thank you for your attention



4th technical meeting - wp6

Education