2020-2021Student Teaching

Handbook

1 | P a g e

Revised December 2020 

HANOVER COLLEGEEducator Preparation Program Faculty and Staff

Newby Hall517 Ball Drive

Hanover, IN 47243

Deborah Hanson, Ed. D.Professor of Education812-866-7393 (office)812-344-0233 (cell)

hanson@hanover.edu

Dustin Bailey, Ed. D.Head of Educator PreparationEducation Department Chair

Associate Professor of Education812-866-7392 (office)317-370-4486 (cell)bailey@hanover.edu

Dava Roth, M. Ed.Instructor of Education812-866-7395 (office)

roth@hanover.edu

Cheryl TorlineEducation Student Services Coordinator & Licensing Advisor

812-866-7390 (office)812-493-5901(cell)

torline@hanover.edu

NOTE: The Hanover College Education Department and the College hires high-quality adjunct instructors and student teacher supervisors on an as needed basis. These are current or recently retired educators who we have every confidence in the professionalism they bring to the Educator Preparation Program.

2 | P a g e

“Of the two purposes of education--to make individuals fit for the world as it is and tomake them able to change it--the second is the more important.”

--- C. Delisle Burns

3 | P a g e

Welcome to student teaching! The EDU department is excited to offer you an experience to help you grow as a professional and prepare you for your first year of teaching.

Standard for Success is the data management system used by the Hanover College Educator Preparation Program beginning with Fall Term 2020. Education candidates will be required to purchase a user subscription to store their Program documents, artifacts, assessments, and other critical pieces for their professional preparation to obtain teacher licensure. Students may choose to pay by the semester at $50 or pay for the entire academic year's subscription at $100. This is the same as a textbook that is required for courses.

All admitted teacher candidates are REQUIRED to have this subscription in force each term. To subscribe to Standard for Success go to: https://www.standardforsuccess.com/university-registration-hanover-college/

To log in to Standard for Success, https://edu.sfsed.com

The first visit, students will be required to create an account. Students who have not paid will be unable to upload assignments for scoring. If you have technical issues, please use the HELP link in Standard for Success or email Support at: help_he@standardforsuccess.com

Decision Point 3 Passing Criterion: 90% effective or highly effective ratings on all componentsThese are non-negotiable and all criteria in all three components must be met for to be eligible for certification and approval of your teaching license.

If the passing benchmark on each component is not achieved, then the candidate will be asked to a). redo the taskb). repeat the experiencec). placed on intervention plan for improvementd). not pass student teaching

4 | P a g e

TIPS FOR STUDENT TEACHING

General Tips: Get involved right away! Communicate with your clinical educators; continue to check your Hanover email. Initiate questions and progress on tasks (scheduling formal observations, videotaping, midterm/final evaluations) Be creative in lesson planning. Do not overlook details and routines. Leave your mentor teacher something that he/she can incorporate next year! Utilize the gold mine of resources and information that your mentor teacher represents! Schedule formal observations (2 by your mentor teacher and 2 by your Hanover College supervisor). Ideally, one

formal observations by each should be completed prior to the midterm/second evaluation.

5 | P a g e

Decision Point 3classsroom

teaching performance as

rated on final rubric

Assignments listed on EDU 455/456/458

syllabi

Reflective presentation

over experience and content

review document

PART A: REQUIREMENTS FOR COURSESYLLABUS: EDU 455/456/459: Elementary/Secondary/All-Grade Student Teaching Winter 2020

Mission StatementHanover College is dedicated to being a challenging and supportive community engaging in transformative scholarly inquiry that establishes a foundation for lifelong service and learning Catalog Description: Supervised student teaching in elementary and secondary classrooms in school settings approved by Education Faculty and the College. Campus seminars with the Department. Fourteen weeks of full-time student teaching. 4 units credit. Fee charged. Course ContextThe student teaching experience is a culminating experience for Hanover College education programs. The experience stresses four large goals expressed in the Education Department’s Conceptual Framework: to prepare committed, competent, culturally responsive, and critically reflective new teachers. Student teaching is part of Decision Point 3 which determines your readiness for licensure. Course GoalsThe teacher candidate will be committed, competent, culturally responsive, and critically reflective ready for their first year teaching. Text:The First Day of School (2018). Wong and Wong; 5th edition.

Standard for Success:You will be required to have a paid Standard for Success account through the Educator Preparation Program. This software will be used for observations, artifacts, portfolios, and providing feedback throughout student teaching.

https://www.standardforsuccess.com/university-registration-hanover-college/

Requirements: THESE REQUIREMENTS ARE NON-NEGIOTABLES-FAILURE TO SUBMIT ANY OF THE DOCUMENTS MAY RESULT IN FAILURE TO PASS EDU 455/456/458/459 (Student Teaching). These assignments are designed to enhance your student teaching experience. It is important that you devote time and energy to submitting high quality assignments.

Read The First Day of School by the beginning of your student teaching experience. Weekly reflections submitted to campus supervisor and moodle (format provided; some special reflections

required) Interdisciplinary unit (written and taught) Video reflection over lesson taught (submitted by week 6) Assessments of student learning (over unit) Observations of specials: Physical Education, Music and Art (elementary education only) Reflective presentation over student teaching experience (Decision Point 3) Attendance at student teaching seminars Content portfolio document (social studies) Content portfolio document (Mild Interventions)

More details on these assignments can be found in the student teaching handbook. Rubrics will be provided for each assignment and on the department website. 90% of the criterion in the candidate teaching assessment is required to pass student teaching.

6 | P a g e

Student teaching Seminars: (topics can be added upon request) Date time Topics Assignments (to be completed

before seminar)Monday, January 18 7-8:30 pm Classroom management

Professional behavior

Week 2 reflection (special format): How does your mentor teacher illustrate the classroom management strategies detailed in Wong’s book The First Day of School.

Monday, February 1 7-8:30 pm Unit planning and assessment project overviewHigher order thinkingInteractions with Parents and Colleagues

Video and reflection over teaching must be submitted by this date

Monday, February 15 7-8:30 pm Differentiating InstructionLicensure questionsCurriculum Mapping

Monday, March 1 7-8:30 pm Suicide Prevention module debriefAttending to the social and emotional needs of students

Suicide training prevention module

Monday, March 15 7-8:30 pm Preparing for DPT 3Week of April 12 TBD DPT 3 presentations Unit and assessment project should

be submitted to supervisor by April 1

EDU 458: Integrated Student Teaching Winter 2020

Mission StatementHanover College is dedicated to being a challenging and supportive community engaging in transformative scholarly inquiry that establishes a foundation for lifelong service and learning Catalog Description: Supervised student teaching in elementary and secondary classrooms in school settings approved by Education Faculty and the College. Campus seminars with the Department. Fourteen weeks of full-time student teaching. 4 units credit. Fee charged. Course ContextThe student teaching experience is a culminating experience for Hanover College education programs. The experience stresses four large goals expressed in the Education Department’s Conceptual Framework: to prepare committed, competent, culturally responsive, and critically reflective new teachers. Student teaching is part of Decision Point 3 which determines your readiness for licensure. Course GoalsThe teacher candidate will be committed, competent, culturally responsive, and critically reflective. Text:The First Day of School (2018). Wong and Wong; 5th edition. Requirements: THESE REQUIREMENTS ARE NON-NEGIOTABLES-FAILURE TO SUBMIT ANY OF THE DOCUMENTS MAY RESULT IN FAILURE TO PASS EDU 458-Student Teaching

Read The First Day of School by the beginning of your student teaching experience. Weekly reflections submitted to campus supervisor and moodle (format provided; some special reflections

required) Interdisciplinary unit (written and taught in gen ed placement) Video reflection over lesson taught (in both placements)

7 | P a g e

Completion/implementation of Behavior Intervention Plan (BIP) Completion/implementation of CBA (content based assessment) Reflection over Observational experiences in the elementary, junior high and high school setting Four examples of lessons with students, reflecting on the lesson goals/objectives, interventions and modified

strategies and progress monitoring of student learning DPT3 presentation over student teaching experience additional time for reflection over SPED experience SPED portfolio due at end of student teaching experience. Attendance at student teaching seminars

More details on these assignments can be found in the student teaching handbook. 90% of the criterion in the candidate teaching assessment is required to pass student teaching. Student teaching Seminars: (topics can be added upon request)

Student teaching Seminars: (topics can be added upon request) Date time Topics Assignments (to be

completed before seminar)Monday, January 18 7-8:30 pm Classroom management

Professional behavior

Week 2 reflection (special format): How does your mentor teacher illustrate the classroom management strategies detailed in Wong’s book The First Day of School.

Monday, February 1 7-8:30 pm Unit planning and assessment project overviewHigher order thinkingInteractions with Parents and Colleagues

Video and reflection over teaching must be submitted by this date

Monday, February 15 7-8:30 pm Differentiating InstructionLicensure questionsCurriculum Mapping

Monday, March 1 7-8:30 pm Suicide Prevention module debriefAttending to the social and emotional needs of students

Suicide training prevention module

Monday, March 15 7-8:30 pm Preparing for DPT 3

Week of April 12 TBD DPT 3 presentations Unit and assessment project should be submitted to supervisor by April 1

8 | P a g e

Hanover College Teacher Education Program requires proof of student membership in the National Education Association (NEA) in order to ensure that our candidates are adequately covered in the case of an accident or lawsuit. This membership provides $1,000,000 of liability insurance for our student teachers at a very low cost. Proof of membership is required to be on file in the Newby Hall office prior to allowing you to begin your teaching assignment. Please forward to the Student Services Coordinator the membership confirmation email from NEA when you apply online or photocopy your membership card for our records. Dues for the Hanover College chapter of ISEA ($7) are included in the ONLINE NEA membership cost. NEA sends this payment to Hanover for you

Who can enroll?Student Membership is available if you are enrolled in a postsecondary program that is preparatory for employment in a position that will make you eligible for Active (teacher) membership in the NEA.

Early Enrollment ProgramThe Early Enrollment Program offers first-time members enrollment for the next membership year, plus selected benefits of membership, including coverage in the Employment Educators Liability insurance program, starting immediately upon completing the online enrollment procedure. (If the online system is unavailable but you need to enroll immediately, simply submit a paper enrollment form for the next membership year, with check payment.) To apply – browse to the following https://sites.nea.org/HowToJoin/stateStudent.do?mbrType=STUDENT&sea=in

Membership Year and Benefits CoveragePlease pay attention and note the coverage year dates when you are applying. If you are unsure, please call NEA to ensure you get the coverage that you need. Benefits of current-year membership, including Employment Educators Liability insurance coverage, are effective from the date application is made with payment, through the end of the membership year. FALL STUDENT TEACHERS NEED TO USE THE EARLY ENROLLMENT OPTION FOR THE NEXT ACADEMIC YEAR IN ORDER TO NOT HAVE TO PURCHASE MEMBERSHIP TWICE!! For more information about benefits of NEA Student Program Membership, go to https://nea.org

There are many other advantages of being a part of the NEA Student Program. Benefits include: Member Discounts and Services: low-interest credit cards car rentals mortgage plan with low down payment options early-start investment plan for retirement life insurance accidental death and dismemberment insurance magazine subscriptions $20 dues rebate after graduation and moreDuring your first year of teaching and regular NEA membership, you'll be eligible to receive a rebate of $20 for each year you were a student member. The rebate form is downloadable from the NEA website.

Indiana Office:Indiana State Teachers Association

150 W. Market StreetSuite 900

Indianapolis, IN 46204Phone: (317) 263-3400 Fax: (317) 655-3700

9 | P a g e

Decision Point 3: Part B-Student teaching guidelinesSTUDENT TEACHER RESPONSIBILITY

Required Background Checks

Information: The Student Teacher is responsible for researching and completion of all background checks required by their specific host school system. These can vary in scope and cost - student teachers are responsible for all costs involved. Some can require a wait time so do pursue this well before the first of the school year! In the rare case that a school system would not require any background check, the student teacher would be required to follow the same policy as any other EDU course with a field component, and obtain a background check via Safe Hiring Solutions (please see information at www.education.hanover.edu under the ABOUT tab.

Please note: you should forward proof of your background check to the Student Services Offices for your student records. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Cheryl Torline in the Student Services Office.

Note: The Student Services Office is normally closed the last two weeks of June and the first two weeks of July.

INTRODUCTION TO HANOVER’S STUDENT TEACHING PROGRAM

This handbook is available to student teachers, cooperating mentor teachers, school administrators, College supervisors, members of the Hanover College Teacher Education Committee, members of the Department of Education’s Teacher Education Advisory Board, state and national accrediting agencies, and other identified stakeholders in the teacher education program at Hanover College. This handbook is designed to offer an accessible overview of Hanover’s student teaching program. It is understood that for many teachers, the most important aspect of their professional preparation has been the student teaching experience. This handbook is meant to reflect a meaningful, carefully planned student teaching experience, which requires clear, cooperative communication between the College, its student teachers, and cooperating school personnel.

Questions, concerns, or changes related to an individual student teacher’s program should be brought to the attention of the designated College supervisor in a timely way. The College supervisor is available to student teachers, cooperating teachers, and cooperating school personnel to answer questions and explain procedures used or recommended by the College during each term. Effective communication among the student teacher, mentor, and College supervisor is essential in achieving a successful, productive, and positive learning and teaching experience for all participants. If deemed necessary by clinical supervisors, the student teaching period can be extended beyond the 14 week time period.

Student teachers should follow the calendar of the school to which they have been assigned. They should also adhere to the usual school faculty requirements that include: faculty, department, and other professional meetings, Parent Teacher Organization meetings, parent/teacher conferences, and co-curricular events. Student teachers are required to complete fourteen consecutive weeks in their placement. Required attendance begins with the first teacher day and ends at the completion of the thirteen or fourteen-week time period noted by the cooperating mentor teacher and College supervisor.

CO-TEACHING MODEL: This model provides the student teacher an interactive and collaborative experience for effective teaching while the mentor teacher can still maintain an active presence and control over classroom instruction.

Hopefully by using this model, all parties can benefit, grow and meet the expectations of their particular position.

Some guidelines for this experience: 1. The clinical educators and the student teacher should be actively involved from the beginning. While student

teaching is initially observing, suggested activities include learning the special learning needs, interests and IEPs of the classroom using a seating chart format, and documented observations of student personalities and interactions with each other and the teacher, and attendance. The student teacher should be seen as the lead teacher in some fashion during the first two weeks of the experience.

2. The clinical educator and student teacher should interchange roles throughout the experience so each is acting as the lead teacher approximately 50% of the time. One suggested method is to pass a baton back and forth so the students know who the lead teacher is for that particular lesson. This can be more or less depending on the readiness of the student teacher.

10 | P a g e

When acting in the supporting teacher role, the student teacher is expected to be actively engaged in the classroom. The supporting teacher can be working on small group instruction, tutoring, computers, centers, monitoring the “perimeter” for student interaction and behavior.

3. The student teacher is expected to collaborate with grade level/department planning and data analysis.4. The student teacher should be the lead teacher during his/her interdisciplinary unit.5. The student teacher needs to be lead teacher for each subject area at some point during the experience. If the

student teacher is ready, more responsibility can be given.

GOALS AND PURPOSES FOR THE STUDENT TEACHING EXPERIENCE

Hanover College Department of Education’s mission is to prepare competent, committed, culturally responsive, and critically reflective new teachers. The General Assessment Principles for New Teachers approved by the Interstate New Teacher Assessment Support Consortium (INTASC) and the professional, developmental, and content standards established by Specialized Professional Associations (SPAs) and the Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP) support and strengthen the student teaching experience.

QUALIFICATIONS OF STUDENT TEACHERS

Students who graduate from the Hanover College teacher certification programs must demonstrate effectiveness in the following areas: competence in the content knowledge-base and the art of teaching, critical reflection in all aspects of learning and teaching, responsiveness to cultural diversity in schools and communities, and commitment to the ideals and standards of excellence in education. Teacher candidates have completed most of the academic major courses prior to student teaching and have the approval of their subject-matter advisors and the Hanover College Teacher Education Committee. All teacher candidates must show competencies in the second of three decision points in order to qualify for student teaching:

a) 3.0 GPA in your Major.b) Portfolio (meeting criterion at 90% level)c) Successful completion of all Education methods courses, Foundations of Education, and Education Law and

Ethics with positive feedback from field work experiences.d) Decision Point II interview

LEGAL STATUS OF STUDENT TEACHERSThe student teacher may exercise the same duties as a certified teacher with respect to the supervision or disciplining of students. The student teacher may also be liable for any acts of negligence. Student teachers are required by Hanover

College to hold current student membership in the National Education Association (NEA) which includes liability insurance coverage. Proof of this must be received by the Education Student Services Office prior to the beginning of

student teaching. Because legal liability for student teachers has not been determined in the Indiana court of law, it can be assumed that all contacts with students must be under the guidance of a certified teacher. The student teacher is not to

serve as a substitute teacher in the absence of the regular classroom teacher. When supervising students outside of the classroom, the student teacher must be accompanied by a certified staff member. SEE PAGE 7!

QUALIFICATIONS OF TEACHING MENTORSTeachers who serve as mentors for Hanover College student teachers have a minimum of three years of classroom

teaching experience, are regarded by their principals as effective or highly effective teachers, are held in high esteem by Hanover College faculty, and have communicated their willingness to fulfill a teaching mentor’s responsibilities for

preparing new teachers. The mentor anticipates gaining new ideas for improving instruction through an association with the student teacher. The mentor expects that a student teacher can make worthwhile contributions to the school program.

11 | P a g e

ATTENDANCE POLICY DURING THE STUDENT TEACHING EXPERIENCEStudent teaching is a full-time commitment on the part of the teacher candidate. However, the Department recognizes that

there will certain instances when one has to be absent. A student teacher is allowed five absences for illness; two absences without a doctor’s note, and three with a doctor’s note. Student teachers are not allowed personal days.

When absent, the student teacher is to keep in touch daily with their mentor and supervisor. After returning to the student teaching assignment, the student teacher will provide the supervisor with the required doctor’s notes if they were absent

past two days. A prescription does not count as a note; it must be from a doctor written to the school. The student teacher must make up each day of absence by the end of the College term. As it is crucial to be in school every day, should the

student teacher have to miss more than five days and failure is imminent, a meeting will be set with the Education Department to decide how to proceed. During their placement, student teachers are required to attend every regularly

scheduled school day and follow the daily schedule for faculty arrival and dismissal times. Student teachers will follow daily schedules and vacation dates of the school in which they are assigned. The student teacher is to remain on site between arrival and dismissal times. If there is a school in-service day, the student teacher is expected to be present.

If a student teacher is unable to attend because of illness or an emergency, the student teacher must telephone the school immediately or by 6:30AM on the day of the absence to notify the clinical educators and school administration of the absence, as well as the College supervisor. Contact must be made and simply sending an email is not appropriate. Lesson plans, materials, and essential information must be present and accessible to the clinical educators so that he or she can serve as the substitute teacher during the student teacher’s absence.

Student Teachers are required to attend all scheduled student teaching seminars on campus. These are excused absences.

PLANNING EXPECTATIONS

Planning is expected. It is a must! Carefully planned lessons are key for communication between the student teacher and the clinical educators. However, planning for a student teacher will look different than your teachers. A student teacher CANNOT simply use the notes in the plan book as lesson plans; this is not the level of planning that is required for a beginning teacher. It is imperative to continue to develop teaching skills that one must think through all aspects of a lesson for every lesson you teach. Lesson plans need to be written and submitted to your mentor teacher. Once you start teaching a subject or class period, the lesson plans should be submitted the Thursday before the week teaching. This time is needed for clinical educators to review lesson plans and provide feedback to finalize lessons. There are two different formats for lesson planning: an abbreviated lesson plan and the formal lesson plan. Abbreviated lesson plan formats are used for daily lessons and announced observations from your campus supervisor and mentor teacher require the formal lesson plan format. Both lesson plan formats are included in the handbook.

Abbreviated Lesson Plan Format-DAILY LESSONSAcademic Standards:Lesson Objectives: Differentiation for diverse learners:Procedures: (special attention to engaging introduction, safety, transitions, time management, higher order questions, content, 5E format)Assessment strategies:

Formal lesson plan for observations is later in the document.

STUDENT TEACHER RESPONSIBILITIESThe student teacher should consider this assignment as a full-time, professional responsibility and is expected to:

Report to school for all teacher workdays within the required fourteen weeks and check in and out of the school according to hours expected of the school faculty.

Prepare daily lesson plans as required by school faculty, particularly in the case of needing a substitute teacher.

12 | P a g e

Prepare three formal lesson plans for lessons that the College supervisor observes and three that the mentor teacher observes.

Conference with the mentor teacher and College supervisor at least 3 times during the term. Plan with the mentor on a regular, scheduled basis and submit written lesson plans in advance Submit a weekly reflective journal to the College supervisor. Report any concerns regarding the student teaching assignment to the College supervisor. Report anticipated absences by 6:30AM of the day of absence to the mentor teacher. Ask for and constructively respond to feedback from the mentor and College supervisor about teaching and

student (K-12) learning. Write formal analysis of teaching and student learning for each of the four formal lessons taught for observations.

Read and sign all observation, conferencing, and evaluation forms. Complete evaluation of mentor and supervisor at the end of the term. Attend student teaching seminars. Observe and become acquainted with other classrooms and teachers in the school and/or school district. Analyze at least one set of assessment results during student teaching. Prepare and maintain artifacts, photos and video clip for final Decision Point 3 presentation.

Note: All documents must be submitted in electronic format (Word, PDF, or scan) so the documentation can be uploaded to the student’s electronic file.

MENTOR TEACHER RESPONSIBILITIES

The fourteen-week student teaching experience offers the teacher candidates the opportunity to expand their professional knowledge-base and develop their personal philosophies of teaching students. Clinical educators work together to support student teachers as they begin to translate sound learning theory into effective classroom practice. These efforts enable the student teacher, with guidance, to assume a full-time teaching responsibility. We embrace a co-teaching model (please see the bottom of page 3 for more details). In addition to the co-teaching model description, cooperating mentors are expected to:

Complete and return W9 Form for payment of honorarium and Credential Form for accreditation files (available online https://education.hanover.edu/resources/mentorteacherresources.php and emailed to Cheryl Torline).

Acquaint the student teacher with school policies, procedures, and specific classroom organization principles. Orient the student teacher to the faculty, staff, school, district, and local community.

Assist the student teacher in making her or his role understood and welcomed by parents and students, and help the student teacher make the sometimes difficult transition from “college student” to “teacher.”

Provide the student teacher with a personal workspace in the classroom, a teacher’s plan book, a school calendar, copies of grade level curriculum materials, a weekly schedule of special activities, access to audio-visual equipment, rules and access for the copy center, all required textbooks and instructional materials, and information about daily routines and responsibilities.

Introduce the student teacher to the children and define her or his role in terms of identity and authority, and teaching responsibilities for the next fourteen weeks.

Model and discuss effective classroom management techniques, and assist the student teacher in adapting them for her/his own use.

Support the student teacher in gradually taking on new and appropriate responsibility for planning, teaching, evaluation, and record-keeping.

Schedule weekly instructional planning sessions with the student teacher. Schedule weekly formal evaluation conferences to discuss student teacher strengths and areas in need of

improvement. The mentor should complete two written observations by the second evaluation. Participate in two conferences with the student teacher and College supervisor. Complete and submit to the

College supervisor (with a copy to the student teacher) the initial and final evaluation forms. The mentor should complete one after the midterm conference and before the final conference. These should be electronic in format - even a scan of the document is preferable to a hard copy.

Offer assistance in video recording the student teacher for her or his self-evaluation of teaching. Provide time for and maintain communication with the College supervisor about the student teacher’s progress in

the program. The mentor should consistently meet with the college supervisor and student teacher during the term for conferences.

Complete College Supervisor Evaluation form and email this to the Education Program Office

13 | P a g e

COLLEGE SUPERVISOR RESPONSIBILITIES

Establish and maintain communication with mentors, student teachers, building principals and administrative staff, colleagues in the Education Department, Hanover College faculty, and stakeholders in the teacher education program.

Offer critique and assistance to student teachers as they revise and communicate their philosophies of teaching and learning, develop unit and lesson plans and portfolios, explore effective teaching approaches, develop appropriate classroom organization techniques, and refine their professionalism.

Listen and respond appropriately, as soon as it is possible to do so, to any problems, questions, or concerns brought to the supervisor’s attention by the mentor or student teacher.

Read and respond to the student teachers’ portfolios and weekly reflective journal entries. Complete two on-site observations and one video observation (see Observation Form) of teaching and share these

critiques with the student teachers and mentors. Require formal lesson plans and analysis from the student teacher for these observations.

Participate in and document consistent goal setting with the mentor and student teacher to share information and clarify expectations for the student teaching experience.

Participate in and document two evaluation conferences with the mentor and student teacher.

NOTE: Clinical Educators will find all documents on our website at https://education.hanover.edu/resources/ and we must REQUIRE that we receive them back in electronic format – Word, PDF, or Google Docs. These documents become an official part of each student’s files as

well as data for our Program accreditation.

TIMELINE OF EXPECTATIONS

How the Student Teacher and Clinical Educators Can Develop a Successful Student Teaching ExperienceFollowing confirmation of the student teacher’s placement and prior to classes beginning if possible…Student Teacher:

Become familiar with school rules and guidelines regarding attendance, dress, and participation in extra-curricular or professional development activities, confidentiality, and schedules.

Notify mentors, school principal and supervisor about anticipated absences or change of schedule during the student teaching assignment. Anticipate and attend seminars, conferences, or workshops scheduled by the College or the school.

Become acquainted with school personnel and their responsibilities such as the secretary, guidance counselor, custodian, nurse, special education specialists, cafeteria managers, and bus drivers.

Share resume or brief biographical sketch with mentor.Clinical Educator:

Complete and submit W-9 and Credential Form for stipend by October 1st for fall and March 1st for winter. https://education.hanover.edu/resources/mentorteacherresources.php

Prepare classroom and students for the student teacher’s arrival. Orient student teacher to school faculty, staff, and community. Anticipate two evaluation conferences and forms. Invite the student teacher to meetings and other school events. Plan for some early participation in class activities for the student teacher

College Supervisor: Respond to student teacher and mentor requests or concerns in a timely and professional manner. Provide pertinent materials to student teachers, mentors, and school administrators. Clarify the student teaching program, policies or guidelines. Develop schedule for two evaluation conferences and two lesson observations.

Phase 1: Week 1 - Student Teacher’s Early Observation/Preparation (In addition to the co-teaching model description on page 2)

Student Teacher: Begin to establish a professional rapport with students that models an appropriate teacher-student relationship. Follow school policies and procedures regarding students’ daily routine, discipline, safety, and communication with parents.

14 | P a g e

Assist mentor with routine duties, housekeeping, data collection, and extra-curricular or professional development activities. Acquire information about students which will help in designing and planning lessons. Acquire information about accepted curriculum, current units or projects, ways of assessing student progress, and the

school’s current special programs. Participate in school functions that teachers are expected to attend. Participate in informal planning, critique, and organizing of classroom events with mentor.

Participate in data team meetings.

Clinical Educator: Provide student teacher with instructional materials, a personal space for work, guidance concerning access to student

records, audio-visual equipment, and other materials Acquaint student teacher with needs of students, the curriculum, and the types of instruction used in the classroom and school Acquaint student teacher with student learning standards that are currently being addressed Allow the student teacher to share in setting goals for instruction/unit/program Ensure confidentiality of student records

College Supervisor: Document informal visits and goal setting sessions

Phase 2: Student Teacher’s Early Participation in Classroom Instruction (Weeks 2-3)

Student Teacher: Submit lesson plans to the mentor for approval before teaching. Consistently work with the mentor in planning and teaching.

Maintain a teacher’s daily/weekly plan book, which is available to the mentor and College supervisor (when he/she comes to the classroom). Establish a time frame for phase in of teaching duties.

Develop and use a variety of student assessment activities. Use the mentor’s system for recording or documenting student performance.

Submit reflection on mentor teacher’s classroom management plan and how it relates to the concepts discussed in Wong’s book.

Clinical Educaotr: Encourage student teacher to use a variety of teaching and student assessment strategies. Discuss with the student teacher the extent of authority and responsibility he/she will have or reach an agreement on the

mentor and student teacher roles. After guided practice teaching, determine with the student teacher when he/she has demonstrated competence and confidence

to assume lead teaching responsibility in the co-teaching model. Schedule a regular time to discuss student teacher’s strengths and weaknesses and make specific suggestions for

improvement.

College Supervisor: Begin to assist in the improvement of the student teacher’s instructional skills through observation and conferences and

discuss with the teaching mentor the needs of the student teacher.

Phase 3: Lead Teaching Responsibility(Weeks 4-13)

Student Teacher:

Work with the cooperating mentor to design and document unit/lesson plans, prepare and organize in advance all instructional materials necessary for effective learning experiences; student teacher should have full control over at least one subject or class period.

Demonstrate effective teaching in accordance with professional and content standards and student standards to meet curricular and individual student learning goals.

Seek advice of mentor concerning curriculum resources, long term projects or programs, classroom management, student safety, or professional development.

Collaborate with the mentor teacher in defining the co-teaching responsibilities. Observe music, art, and PE classrooms at least one time, and complete a reflection for each experience (Elementary

Education).Clinical Educator:

Monitor student performance and learning standards and review this with the student teacher. Except for serious problems that must be corrected while class is in session, avoid correcting the student teacher in front of a classroom of students.

Encourage the student teacher’s self-evaluation and critical reflection. Continue to participate in the classroom in the co-teaching model. Ensure students have exposure to the case conference process (Special Education/Dual License). Have student teacher observe music, art, and PE classrooms at least one time each (Elementary Education).

15 | P a g e

College Supervisor: Assist in the improvement of the student teacher’s instructional skills through observation and conferences. Discuss with the teaching mentor the needs of the student teacher. Document and share classroom observations with student teacher and mentor.

Phase 4: Culminating Experience(Week 14)

Student Teacher: Provide for the transition of instruction and other lead teaching responsibilities back to the mentor. Complete final evaluation. Evaluate the student teaching program and supervision. Complete Decision Point 3 Presentation for faculty and others

Clinical Educator: Assess if the student teacher has a realistic and accurate understanding of his/her current competencies. Evaluate the student teaching program and supervision. Letters of professional support would be greatly appreciated by student teachers as they begin their search for a teaching

position; however, mentors have no obligation to provide a letter of reference.

College Supervisor: Facilitate final checklist of supervising responsibilities. See attached documentation - includes attending Decision Point 3 Culminating Experience Presentation of your students and electronic submission of all forms.

Special Education Dual License Requirements

Student teachers pursuing a dual license in special education (Mild Interventions) need to ensure that they have enrolled in EDU 458 (Integrated Student Teaching) and will have an assignment that has both regular and special education experience.  Special Education placements will be arranged in one of the following manners:

A general education placement and a separate special education placement. An inclusion placement (if greater than 30% special education) integrating special education in the general

education classroom, as indicated by number IEP’s in the student population. A separate day school placement (diploma-track) that focuses on the relevant primary content area for licensure.

The division of the placements will be in collaboration with the clinical educators and host school administration. It is highly recommended that student teaching for dual certification occur in the fall semester so more time can be devoted to each placement. Student teaching may be extended up to 17 weeks to accommodate requirements in both general education and SPED.

Student teachers are expected to participate in the case conference process and collaborate with the clinical educator in their role as Teacher of Record during weeks 4-14. Student teachers will accompany mentor teachers to case conferences and join in the process, rather than remaining in the classroom.  The student teacher will complete a BIP/CBA plans during student teaching. A separate SPED portfolio reflecting on the experiences in this area and based on the CEC standards is due at the end of student teaching.

Most importantly, student teachers should not solely develop IEP’s, but may assist the mentor teacher by collaborating, collecting data, and presenting the document with assistance.  Student teachers should follow all the standard teaching duties of the mentor teacher, including meetings, collaboration with providers, meeting with families, and processing data.  

Candidates must be observed in both the general education and special education environments. Candidates will receive two sets of final evaluations (e.g., the first evaluation would be on the general education experience, and the second evaluation would be a combination of both general education and special education experiences). Two documented lesson observations should twice in each placement.

On-going Assessment of Student Teaching

16 | P a g e

The clinical educators should encourage the student teacher to incorporate the following in the student teaching assignment:

Take initiative in seeking help from mentor or supervisor and request constructive criticism/feedback about professional progress in the student teaching assignment.

Document personal growth by recording critical reflections on teaching and learning. Participate with College supervisor and mentor in formal conferences, initial and final evaluations and submit all

reports to designated personnel as scheduled.

WEEKLY JOURNAL OF CRITICAL REFLECTIONS ON STUDENT TEACHING

A written record of critically reflective responses to the challenges and opportunities of student teaching is an essential component of professional development. A reflective journal documents important events, evidences progress, expresses frustrations and hopes, poses important questions, notes interesting ideas, focuses creative thinking about teaching and life-long learning, and demonstrates professional growth to one’s self, as well as to the mentor, college supervisor, and colleagues.

Frequent entries are essential, but these reflections should not be an extensive recounting of minute by minute activities. Please consult with the faculty about specific requirements detailed on the next page. This journal is not a personal diary, nor is it a chronology of activities; it is an insightful record of one’s development as an effective, creative teacher who can think critically about the processes of guiding and assessing students’ learning. It is important to include observations of student’s cognitive and social development along with reflections on their responses to learning opportunities. It might be helpful to organize the journal into special sections for recording memorable questions and comments from the students, noting other teachers’ philosophies and effective practices, recording inspiring quotes, listing books and articles that others recommend for future reading, and posing questions for the mentor’s and supervisor’s comments.

This record is open to public view. Certain entries could be used in a final Decision Point 3 Presentation (particularly for INTASC Principle 9). Awareness of one’s readers is vital, and their questions and comments should receive thoughtful attention. The quality of reflections and the manner in which the completed record is presented for final review will be considered in the evaluation of the student teaching. Responses included in this journal will support the refinements of one’s philosophy of teaching, as well as offer information and perspectives for stating professional goals for one’s first year of teaching

Submit Weekly Journal Progress Reports to your supervisor. This reflection is due Sunday reflecting on the previous week’s experiences. Approximate length of reflections should be 3 pages.

Weekly Journal Progress Report: Week #______

Word Describing Your week: ____________________________

1. General overview of your week: how did it go?

2. Targeted reflections:

a. Week 2: How does your mentor teacher illustrate the classroom management strategies detailed in

Wong’s book The First Day of School.

b. Classroom Management:

17 | P a g e

What boundaries did you set?

How are you establishing your teacher presence?

How are you being proactive and diffusing possible situations?

How was your time management? How are you managing transitions and the amount of downtime?

c. Did you challenge your students this week?

What DOK levels were your activities? (give examples)

Provide some examples of your Higher Order thinking lesson objectives along with

Student responses and Bloom’s taxonomy level.

Provide some examples of your Higher Order thinking lesson questions along with student responses and

Bloom’s taxonomy level

3. How did you meet the academic learning needs of your students this week?

Include both students with IEP and 504 plans along with those with accelerated learning needs.

4. How did you do at communicating and collaborating with parents and colleagues this week?

5. How did you model moral and ethical this week?

6. Progress on another student teaching goal?

7. Self-care: What did you do for yourself this week? Self-care is important!

Assignments

There are two assignments that must be completed during the student teaching experience: an interdisciplinary unit and an assessment project from the unit.

A. Guidelines for Interdisciplinary Unit PlansCandidates are expected to develop an interdisciplinary unit and be lead teacher during the student teaching experience. During this unit, you will be expected to collect and analyze data to measure student understanding for the standards taught for the assessment project assignment. These are two different assignments and each section will be evaluated separately. The unit rubric will serve as a guide for the expectation for this unit.

The unit should be developmentally appropriate; the length should be equivalent to a typical unit for your grade level. The unit should be interdisciplinary and intentionally incorporate at least one other content area with the appropriate standards and objectives for the integrated content. The lesson plans should be at least the quality of what is used to lead instruction in the classroom, but more detail about what the teacher does and what the student will do and for time management may need to be included. Differentiation strategies should be explicitly detailed and included for all exceptional learners.

The unit should include:a). unit standards and objectives (may be organized for each day). b). clearly labelled and sequenced lesson plans for each day throughout the unit including best practices for teaching contentc). differentiation strategies for instructiond). assessment strategies (formative and summative)e). technology to enhance student learning

The unit is due one week before your Decision Point 3 interview.

18 | P a g e

Updated June 2020)

InTASC standards: 3, 6, 7, 8 REPA 3 pedagogy/developmental standards: 1,3,4 (elementary and secondary) Criterion Highly Effective Effective Developing IneffectiveStandards Unit contains new

standards to be learned along with separate list of prerequisite skills required in lesson

Unit focused on one or two new standards

Extensive list of standards listed; unable to teach all to the depth required

No academic standards listed

Objectives All objectives are measurable covering all standards (including process/practices as applicable and ISTE) and requiring multiple levels of higher order thinking

All objectives are measurable covering all standards (including process/practices as applicable and ISTE)

At least one Objective not measurable

Not all standards are met with learning objectives

Content covered in lessons (discipline)

Content reviewed, restated and rephrased throughout unit with main points emphasized repeatedly with clear purpose making content meaningful and relevant to student’s lives

Content reviewed, restated and rephrased throughout unit with main points emphasized repeatedly with clear purpose connections to the “big transferrable idea”

Content presented with some checks for reviewing and restating previous concepts and main points; lists big transferrable idea but not embedded

Content presented in individual isolated lessons

Lessons Lessons are Sequential and varied in creative and engaging formats building on prerequisite knowledge and targeted on debunking student misconceptions

Lessons are Sequential building on prerequisite knowledge with more than 25% varied in creative and engaging formats

Lessons are sequential building on prerequisite knowledge with less than 25% of the lessons varied in format

Lessons have appearance of being somewhat random and non- sequential allowing for concepts to not be fully developed

Interdisciplinary connections

Authentic and meaningful interdisciplinary learning experiences with multicultural aspects included

Unit makes authentic, smooth and meaningful interdisciplinary connections meeting standards for each discipline

Unit has interdisciplinary connections, but seem forced and do not flow naturally between disciplines

Unit lists interdisciplinary content but at least one area not fully developed

Instructional Activities

Clearly developed lesson plans in formal lesson plan format using best practices andhigher order thinking questions listed in each lesson

Lesson plans are developed with details using best practices for discipline and plan for effective time management

Lesson plans are minimal in detail but have enough description so one can tell what teacher is doing and what students should be doing

Lesson plans are in minimal with limited details on how the teacher is presenting the material and student expectations

Differentiation strategies

Detailed Differentiation strategies present for all exceptional learners including those that may not be present in actual classroom (advanced, SPED, ENL)

Contains differentiation strategies for all exceptional learners

Differentiation strategies are vague, lacking detailed plans to meet individual student learning needs

Differentiation strategies not present

Technology Uses technology to meet at least one ISTE standards and impact student learning

Uses technology to enhance lessons

Technology use is basic classroom technology (document cameras, smart boards, etc)

Technology is not incorporated in unit

Assessments Varied formative and summative assessment formats requiring higher order thinking covering all standards and objectives

Mix of formative and summative assessments covering all standards and objectives

Mix of formative and summative assessments covering at least one standard and/or objective not covered

Limited or no assessment strategies included in unit

19 | P a g e

B. Assessment/Pre-Post Assignment: Teacher Standards: Teacher Standards: InTASC standard 6, REPA 3 (state) developmental/pedagogy standard 4: Assessment (elementary and secondary). Increase understanding of 1) strategies and skills for effectively assessing content-specific student understanding; 2) characteristics, uses, advantages, and limitations of different types of assessments; 3) measurement theory and evaluation of assessments for validity, reliability, and bias; and 4) circular process in planning instruction, assessment, and curriculum--adapts instruction and curriculum given student assessment results

There are many ways to assess student learning. As long as the assessment is valid, reliable, and unbiased, the best method of assessing student learning will depend on the context and content of the lesson or unit. In this assessment, you are to assess student learning at one point during the unit (formative) and at the end of the unit (summative or pre-post). The analysis is for ONE class of students.

Your analysis of student learning should include:a). standards and lesson objectives taught and assessed (discipline specific, ISTE, and interdisciplinary)b). detailed lesson plans for the unitc). analysis of student learning:d). your reflection on student learning investigating your teaching, the student and the assessment instruments (exit slip, quiz,

test questions). e). disaggregated data by objective for each individual, including your exceptional learnersf). assessment quality: discussion of reliability, validity and bias of instrument and how to improveg). changes in lesson, curriculum or differentiation strategies if you could reteach this lesson to increase student learning for ALL learners h). higher order thinking required for this lesson

Rubric for Assessment Assignment: (revised May 2020) InTASC standard 6: AssessmentREPA 3 developmental/pedagogy standard 4 (elementary and secondary)

Theme  Highly Effective 4 

Effective 3 

 Developing 2 

Ineffective 1 

 Objectives  Explicit alignment and clear flow between state standards, objectives and lesson

Implied Alignment with standards with clear flow between standards, objectives and lesson

Statement of how objectives align and met state standards but objectives/standards are not thoroughly covered in lesson

No alignment with academic standards 

Objectives Objectives broken down into clear statements including objectives in all areas (ISTE, SEPS, math practices)  

Objectives written in clear measurable statements but limited to content only

Objectives are clear but not measurable

No lesson objectives

Reflection of teaching 

Detailed and in-depth reflection (examples)on student learning includes teaching, student and instrument tools  

Reflection on student learning includes teaching, student and instrument tools but depth lacking in one of these areas. 

Limited Reflection based only on teaching and students 

Shallow reflection of teaching with limited details on student performance only 

Analysis of student learning  

Addressed strengths and weaknesses in student learning, broken down in percentages for each objective level in percentages for individual students with special attention to exceptional learners

clear statement of which objectives students learned and what should be retaught for the group

Addresses general patterns and differences between pre and post results 

No indication of analysis for student growth or learning 

Instrument Quality 

Addresses adjustments to be made to improve the validity, reliability and bias pre-

Discusses validity, reliability and bias of the pre-post assessments in detail and how met in assessment

Mentions validity, reliability, or bias of pre and post results

No indication of consideration for assessment validity, reliability or bias 

20 | P a g e

post assessments   Only reliability mentioned Strategies and RTI 

(differentiation) Explains new strategies for improving student learning and ways to adjust instruction or curriculum for individuals, subgroups, or whole class to increase student learning 

Strategies for improving student learning for individuals, subgroups, or whole class to increase student learning 

Mentions need for improvements in instruction 

No indication of ways to increase student learning 

Higher order thinking 

Explains DOK level and higher order questions; student responses discussed over objectives, assessments and in student learning analysis; examples provided in each area 

Discusses Higher order question responses over objectives, assessments and in student learning analysis 

Mentions higher order thinking; limited to objectives or questions in lesson plan  

No evidence or discussion of how Lesson promoted higher order thinking by students 

21 | P a g e

NOTE FOR OUR CLINICAL EDUCATORS/MENTORS:Electronic versions of these forms are available on our website:

https://education.hanover.edu/resources/Please use the digital forms only, and email directly to the college supervisor.

Lesson Observation Form Observation form is to be completed twice by the clinical educator (classroom teacher) and twice by the clinical faculty (Hanover College ST Supervisor) Name: ______________________________ Placement: ______________________ Date: _________________

Grade level: ________ Subject: _________Whole group:______Small group:___________ Mix:_______________Criteria: Not

observedListed on lesson plan but not executed in lesson

Skill present but still developing

Skill well-executed in lesson focused on student needs

INTASC- Standard 1: Learner DevelopmentDevelopmentally appropriate instructional level INTASC 2- learner differences –individual and cultural-high expectations- inclusive learning environments Adapts and differentiates instruction for students’ abilities including IEP’sCommunicates High expectations and demonstrates respect for all learners and self Has Appropriate accommodations for ENL studentsComments: INTASC 3- learning environment- individual and collaborative learning, positive social interaction, active engagement in learningFacilitates a community of learners that demonstrates inclusionCreates an atmosphere where all students can be successful and learn to the best of their abilityHigh level of student engagement in lessonCreative learning options and teaching techniquesEngaging introductions to lesson and activitiesInteracted with ALL students Clear directions provided Wait time used effectivelyPositive and respectful classroom environment and good student rapportEstablishes and maintains effective classroom management; students on-task majority of class time with few disruptionsEffective time management of classroom activities and other responsibilities (routines, transitions, and procedures well- executed)Comments: Criteria: Not

observedListed on lesson plan but not executed in lesson

Skill present but still developing

Skill well-executed in lesson focused on student needs

INTASC 4-content reviewed restated, rephrased and retaught, main points emphasized repeatedlyClear objectives established for lesson and communicated to students

22

Incorporates appropriate examples, explanations and multiple representations of contentResponds appropriately to student misunderstandingComments:INTASC 5-application of content- connect concepts, critical thinking, collaborative problem solving with applications to local and global issuesStudents engaged in higher order critical thinking and problem solvingLessons build on prior knowledge of key concepts and make connections evidentDemonstrates relevance to student’s lives and to the community; provides real-world examples and opportunities for learning INTASC 6-assessment- multiple methods, use to guide instruction, monitor learner progressFrequently checks for student understandingComments: INTASC 7-planning for instruction, cross disciplinary skillsAdvanced preparation of plans and materials; lessons well-organized with all materials preparedData used for planning lessons INTASC 8-instructional strategies-variety of strategies Variety of instructional strategies used throughout lessonComments: 9-professional learning and ethical practice-Continually evaluating practice, adapts practice to meet needs of each learner10-Leadership and Collaboration –collaborate with other teachers, community, families to ensure learner growth and the profession

Rev. 8/1/2018Comments from post-observation discussion (insight on INTASC 9 and 10: reflective practice, context, school community activities):

Goals:

Candidate Evaluation Rubrics

Each teacher certification program has a student teaching evaluation form that is specific to their program, because teacher standards are different for the various content areas. For example, secondary mathematics teacher standards are different from elementary generalist teacher standards. Therefore, these programs have different rubrics. The rubrics will be provided electronically and are also available on our website. These rubrics should be completed twice during the student teaching experience; once early (approximately at week 4) and again at the end. For split placements, these documents should be completed in each placement. The Department is piloting a new format using Standards for Success for collecting the data on these rubrics. Mentor teachers will receive a link to be a guest evaluator from Standards for Success and will complete their evaluation through this platform. More detailed instructions will be presented.

For Mild Interventions, both the Content Area and the Mild Interventions rubrics must be submitted.https://education.hanover.edu/resources/

23

Formal Lesson Plan Format

PRE-CONFERENCE WITH CLINICAL EDUCATORIn preparation for a formal observation, please review the questions below with your mentor teacher. Share your formal lesson plan, example of handout, or student assessment that would be used during this lesson.

1. What learning objectives or standards will you target during this lesson?2. How will you know if students have met the objective?3. Are there questions that you have about students or this lesson?4. Are there skills or new practices that you have been working on that I should look for in this lesson? How are

you addressing your student teaching goals in this lesson?

IdentificationTeacher nameGrade level(s)/ContentTitle of lessonDate

Materials ListTextbook publisher, title, pages; Online resources, movies, clips, etc.; Children’s book author, title; Lab equipment; Manipulatives prepared for students; Handouts or worksheets (attach copies)

Big Transferable IdeaOne or two sentences about WHY the content of this unit or lesson is important, useful, or universally valued

Essential QuestionsList a short set of questions that all students should meaningfully respond to as a result of this unit or lesson.Questions should support higher level thinking or all six levels of Bloom’s taxonomy or six facets of understanding.

Key Concepts or VocabularyList only concepts or vocabulary that all students should understand as a result of this unit or lesson. Check student standards, student goals, required reading, and handouts. Do NOT list concepts or words that you do not use in your lesson or unit!

Prerequisite Skills for Unit or LessonWhat skills are required for students to be successful in this unit or lesson?

Student Standards (Include Indiana State Academic Standards and ISTE Technology Standards)List both numerical indicator and standard wording. Units can be interdisciplinary and include standards across subject areas.

Measureable Student Goals or ObjectivesRestate student standards as specific, measureable goals for the lesson or unit.a. Students will include 100% of key concepts in their small group presentation.b. Students will compute two-digit multiplication problems by hand with 80% accuracy.

Instructional Activities (detailed breakdown of instructional time—minute-by-minute) Bell-ringer-Engaging Introduction-Anticipatory Set 5E Format for Science and Mathematics Sample Higher-Order Thinking Questions

Anticipated Adaptations or Accommodations (RtI) for Activities, Materials, or AssessmentsConsiderations for ELLs, IEPs, Section 504, gender, cultural differences such as poverty, assistive technologies, gifted & talented

Safety Concerns (e.g., physical, social-emotional, and psychological)

24

Assessment PlanThe unit plan must include a pre/post assessment.An exit slip is typical for any lesson plan.Teacher observation is fine, if there is a record of what was observed.Attach rubrics and actual tests, quizzes, guidelines for projects or presentations, etc.

Analysis of Teaching (after you teach)What did you notice about your ability to facilitate student academic practice so that all students participated and had the opportunity to meet your goals or student standards?What did you do to foster a climate of high expectation, excellence, and respect?How did you engage students in academic content?Which teacher standards were you able to address?

Analysis of Student Learning (after you teach)What data did you generate from exit slips? Pre/post? A checklist/\? What did the data indicate about student progress in meeting instructional goals? What changes would you make to increase effectiveness of this lesson or unit?

Teacher Candidate’s Critical Reflection of a Video-taped Lesson*The student teacher must write an analysis of learning and evaluation of one (15 to 20 minute) video-taped lesson during student teaching. This video needs to be completed with reflection by the week 6 of student teaching. Consult with your faculty advisor/clinical supervisor for specific requirements. Include all the sections below. This assignment addresses Critical Reflection in the Conceptual Framework and INTASC Principal 9. Attach the analysis paper to the corresponding lesson plan. Be sure to check on parent permission forms for classroom video-taping, which often are routinely completed at the beginning of each year.

Evaluation of the objectives. Based on student response during the lesson, discuss the appropriateness of the objectives. Did all the students have the prerequisite knowledge, behavior, or disposition which allowed them to learn from this lesson? Were there students for whom you discovered the objectives of the lesson were not appropriate? What adaptations of the objectives did you make during the lesson, if any, if you discovered that the objectives were not appropriate for some of the students?

Evaluation of the instructional strategies. Based on student response during the lesson, discuss the effectiveness of the instructional strategies that you chose. Did all the students respond to your instructional strategies the ways that you envisioned? What were the variations in response which you felt informed you about particular students, i.e. motivating factors, learning styles, past experience, etc. What adaptations in the instructional strategies did you make?

Evaluation of learning environment. Based on student response during the lesson, discuss the effectiveness of handling the learning environment, i.e. classroom management, use of space, use of time, etc. Consider such diverse issues as distributing materials, disruptions, student feedback, and interactions. What will you do differently in the future?

Evaluation of student learning. Based on student learning (student response to your informal and/or formal assessments), discuss the effectiveness of this lesson. What percentage of students demonstrated that they met your intended objectives? If some students did not meet the objectives, how do you account for that lack of learning? You might also want to consider the effectiveness of the assessment that you chose to use. Did the assessment measure what you wanted it to measure?

Evaluation of Teacher Presence, Use of Voice, and Body Language: As you view the videotape, study your teacher presence, use of voice, and use of body language. How do you alter the volume and quality of your voice to maintain student attention and enhance teaching and learning? How do you use body language and gestures to engage students? How does your teacher presence reveal enthusiasm for teaching and for content? How do teacher presence, voice, and body language impact student learning and connection to you and to subject matter? Do you exhibit any distracting movements, repetitions, or habits that interfere with effective teaching?

25

PART C: Decision Point 3Culminating Student Teaching Experience Formal Presentation and Content PortfolioDecision Point 3 will occur at the end of your student teaching experience. There are three parts to this decision point: successful completion of student teaching (90% of the bullets at level 3 or 4 on the final student teaching evaluation), accountability of the content required by your discipline, and an oral presentation reflecting on your goals, growth and evidence of meeting certain criteria from student teaching. This oral presentation will replace the final portfolio based on the INTASC principles. This will parallel Decision Point 2; however, for this Decision Point, the student teacher is expected to present evidence visually (PowerPoint) and will be more interactive with department faculty discussing the experience.

The presentation will occur on the last Friday of the academic term. Each student will have 45 minutes to summarize their student teaching experience to an audience of the department faculty, advisory board members and faculty from other departments on campus. FOR THOSE DOING AN INTEGRATED EXPEREINCE, 45 MINUTES WILL BE DEVOTED TO THE GEN ED PLACEMENT AND 15 MINUTES FOR THE SPED PLACEMENT.

Candidates that do not reach the 90% benchmark will be asked to submit an additional reflection over criterion not covered in the presentation.

A candidate cannot pass Decision Point 3 and obtain licensure without successful completion of all parts (student teaching, content portfolio and successful presentation).

During the presentation, the student teacher is expected to reflect upon the goals set during Decision Point 2, throughout the semester, and with emphasis on growth during student teaching. The presentation should cover 2 or 3 lessons from student teaching. These lessons should vary in the content covered and may include discipline-specific requirements. A video is required from one of the lessons discussed. Requirements for the oral presentation are listed below.

DPT 3 Presentation Rubric (revised Feb 2020)Purpose: To provide insight into candidate dispositions throughout student teaching. Candidate: Panel Member:

Conceptual Framework

InTASC

Criterion Highly Effective Effective Developing Ineffective

Committed 9 Candidate was well-prepared for presentation; on-time; professional appearance and demeanor.

9 Communication Candidate was in constant communication with all aspects of teaching with mentor teacher, grade level team and other building teachers and professionals

Candidate was in constant communication about all aspects of teaching: lesson planning, feedback, students, classroom atmosphere

Candidate was in communication about lesson planning and feedback but did not inquire about student needs and/or school environment

Candidate has limited communication with mentor; conversations initiated by mentor

2 Classroom management

Two classroom management strategies discussed with reflection on journey to implement and impact on establishing a positive classroom environment

One classroom management strategy explicitly discussed with reflection on journey in implementing these strategies

One classroom management strategy discussed or limited/shallow discussion of journey to implement these strategies

No discussion of journey in developing classroom management strategies

Culturally Responsive

Importance and ability to establish a Positive learning environment and community of learners free from bias interacting with all students

Conveyed importance and purposeful plan and execution of ability to establish an inclusive community of learners

Conveyed importance and an example of ability to establish an inclusive community of learners

Importance of inclusive community of learners was noted, but example limited to one group or student

No evidence was able to establish

Importance of high levels of student engagement AND motivation

Multiple examples of Detailed examples of high levels of student engagement making an explicit

At least one Detailed example of high levels of student engagement and motivation making an explicit connection to a

At least one example of high levels of student engagement and motivation but

No mention of value or how promoted high level of student engagement and

26

connection to a positive classroom environment

positive classroom environment

deeper connections not present

motivation

Involvement in school activities

Examples of school involvement that helped form collaborations with colleagues and a community of learners in the classroom

Examples of school involvement to assist in collaborating and developing relationships with colleagues

Examples of school involvement do not contribute to developing a community of learners or collaboration with colleagues

No discussion of involvement in school activities

Commitment to serving the diverse learning needs of students in poverty- all students can learn(CAEP diversity tag)

Evidence Implementing activities with students benefitting from growth mindset of the teacher

Intentionality in lesson planning and classroom activities to support students

Commitment to low SES student success verbally expressed but not supported by evidence

Briefly mentioned need to consider low SES students learning needs

Commitment to serving the diverse learning needs of ENL students (CAEP diversity tag)

Examples of culturally responsive teaching implementing additive or above levels of Banks MC framework

Intentionality in lesson planning and classroom activities to support students

Commitment to ENL student success verbally expressed but not supported by evidence

Briefly mentioned need to consider ENL learning differences

Commitment to serving the diverse learning needs of students from various races and ethnic backgrounds(CAEP diversity tag)

Examples of culturally responsive teaching implementing additive or above levels of Banks MC framework

Intentionality in lesson planning and classroom activities for inclusive classroom

Commitment to students from different races and ethnic backgrounds verbally expressed but not supported by evidence

Briefly mentioned need to consider racial and ethnic differences

Commitment to presenting gender in an unbiased manner(CAEP diversity tag)

Evidence using curricular resources and materials to impartially portray all scopes of gender

Intentionality in lesson planning and classroom activities for inclusive classroom

Commitment to gender equity verbally expressed but not supported by evidence

Briefly mentioned need to consider gender differences

Differentiation for all learners with special attention for exceptional learners in gen ed classroom(CAEP diversity tag)

Evidence Implementing activities with students benefitting from growth mindset of the teacher

Intentionality in lesson planning and classroom activities for inclusive classroom

Commitment to exceptional learner’s success verbally expressed but not supported by evidence

Briefly mentioned need to meet needs of exceptional learners

Accommodations for students with disabilities SPED in gen ed classroom(CAEP diversity tag)

Evidence Implementing activities with students benefitting from growth mindset of the teacher

Intentionality in lesson planning and classroom activities for inclusive classroom

Commitment to exceptional learner’s success expressed but not supported by evidence

Briefly mentioned meeting needs of exceptional learners

Technology(CAEP technology tag)

Discuss how multiple forms of technology were used to enhance instruction and student learning

Discusses how technology purposely used to impact K-12 instruction and student learning

Discusses how technology was used as a tool to enhance instruction

Shallow or No discussion of using technology as a teaching tool

Assessment Discusses value, importance and multiple examples of using data to make data driven decisions with continual

Discusses value, importance and an example of using data to make data driven decision with continual feedback to K-12 students

Discusses example of data driven decision but no insight to value or importance to

Data not effectively used or valued to guide instruction and/or assess student learning

27

feedback to K-12 students

guide instruction and/or assess student learning

Challenge and goals during student teaching

Honest reflection of journey with insights of lessons learned, flexibility, open-mindedness and initiative to try new strategies

Honest Reflection of journey with insights of lessons learned, flexibility and open-mindedness

Guarded reflection of journey focusing only on positive moments without demonstrating flexibility and open-mindedness to new ideas

Reflection shallow with few details of challenges and goals

Problem Solve and flexibility

Example of problem- solving using flexibility, feedback and analysis and reflection

Example of problem solved using flexibility, and feedback

Example of problem solved but no details or insight into flexibility, feedback and reflection

Struggled to problem solve

feedback Sought and implemented feedback on a regular basis discussing examples

A detailed example of how sought and used feedback from clinical educators

Did not effectively discuss how sought and used feedback

Did not actively seek and implement feedback

Reflection on Philosophy of Teaching

Can clearly and succinctly articulate personal philosophy of teaching, changes in that philosophy since being admitted into program and how impacts practice

Can clearly and succinctly articulate personal philosophy of teaching and changes since being admitted into program

Can articulate reflection on philosophy of teaching but not in clear or succinct manner

Did not include reflection on philosophy of teaching

Validity established by Advisory Council-January 2020

.

28

ISTE Nets Education Technology Standards

1. Creativity and Innovation Students demonstrate creative thinking, construct knowledge, and develop innovative products and processes using technology. Students: a. apply existing knowledge to generate new ideas, products, or processes b. create original works as a means of personal or group expression c. use models and simulations to explore complex systems and issues d. identify trends and forecast possibilities 2. Communication and Collaboration Students use digital media and environments to communicate and work collaboratively, including at a distance, to support individual learning and contribute to the learning of others. Students: a. interact, collaborate, and publish with peers, experts, or others employing a variety of digital environments and media b. communicate information and ideas effectively to multiple audiences using a variety of media and formats c. develop cultural understanding and global awareness by engaging with learners of other cultures d. contribute to project teams to produce original works or solve problems 3. Research and Information Fluency Students apply digital tools to gather, evaluate, and use information. Students: a. plan strategies to guide inquiry b. locate, organize, analyze, evaluate, synthesize, and ethically use information from a variety of sources and media c. evaluate and select information sources and digital tools based on the appropriateness to specific tasks d. process data and report results 4. Critical Thinking, Problem Solving, and Decision Making Students use critical thinking skills to plan and conduct research, manage projects, solve problems, and make informed decisions using appropriate digital tools and resources. Students: a. identify and define authentic problems and significant questions for investigation b. plan and manage activities to develop a solution or complete a project c. collect and analyze data to identify solutions and/or make informed decisions d. use multiple processes and diverse perspectives to explore alternative solutions 5. Digital Citizenship Students understand human, cultural, and societal issues related to technology and practice legal and ethical behavior. Students: a. advocate and practice safe, legal, and responsible use of information and technology b. exhibit a positive attitude toward using technology that supports collaboration, learning, and productivity c. demonstrate personal responsibility for lifelong learning d. exhibit leadership for digital citizenship 6. Technology Operations and Concepts Students demonstrate a sound understanding of technology concepts, systems, and operations. Students: a. understand and use technology systems b. select and use applications effectively and productively c. troubleshoot systems and applications d. transfer current knowledge to learning of new technologies

Copyright © 2007, ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education), 1.800.336.5191 (U.S. & Canada) or 1.541.302.3777 (Int’l), iste@iste.org, www.iste.org. All rights reserve

29

A Look at The Model Code of Ethics for Educators (MCEE) The MCEE serves as a guide for future & current educators faced with the complexities of P-12 education. The code establishes principles for ethical best practice, mindfulness, self-reflection, and decision-making, setting the groundwork for self-regulation & self-accountability. The establishment of this professional code of ethics, by educators and for educators, honors the public trust and upholds the dignity of the profession. Following are the MCEE principles; the full code with indicators is available at www.nasdtec.net . Principle I: Responsibility to the ProfessionThe professional educator is aware that trust in the profession depends upon a level of professional conduct and responsibility that may be higher than required by law. This entails holding one and other educators to the same ethical standards.Principle II: Responsibility for Professional CompetenceThe professional educator is committed to the highest levels of professional and ethical practice, including demonstration of the knowledge, skills and dispositions required for professional competence.Principle III: Responsibility to StudentsThe professional educator has a primary obligation to treat students with dignity and respect. The professional educator promotes the health, safety and well-being of students by establishing and maintaining appropriate verbal, physical, emotional and social boundaries. Principle IV: Responsibility to the School CommunityThe professional educator promotes positive relationships and effective interactions, with members of the school community, while maintaining professional boundaries. Principle V: Responsible and Ethical Use of TechnologyThe professional educator considers the impact of consuming, creating, distributing and communicating information through all technologies. The ethical educator is vigilant to ensure appropriate boundaries of time, place and role are maintained when using electronic communication. The MCEE was developed under the leadership of the National Association of State Directors of Teacher Education and Certification (NASDTEC) and is supported by a number of national education organizations that undergird the profession.

More information, details, and resources are available at: http://www.nasdtec.net

30