1 2d shape matching (and object recognition) raghuraman gopalan center for automation research...

50
1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

Upload: jeffry-rich

Post on 12-Jan-2016

225 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

1

2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition)

Raghuraman Gopalan

Center for Automation ResearchUniversity of Maryland, College Park

Page 2: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

2

Outline

What is a shape? Part 1: Matching/ Recognition

Shape contexts [Belongie, Malik, Puzicha – TPAMI ’02]

Indexing [Biswas, Aggarwal, Chellappa – TMM ’10]

Part 2: General discussion

Page 3: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

3

Shape

Some slides were adapted from Prof. Grauman’s course at Texas Austin, and Prof. Malik’s presentation at MIT

Page 4: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

4

Where have we encountered shape before?

Edges/ Contours Silhouettes

Page 5: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

5

A definition of shape

Defn 1: A set of points that collectively represent the object We are interested in their location information

alone!!

Defn 2: Mathematically, shape is an equivalence class under a group of transformations Given a set of points X representing an object O,

and a set of transformations T, shape S={t(X)| t\in T}

Issues? – Kendall ‘84

Page 6: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

6

Applications of Shapes

Analysis of anatomical structuresFigure from Grimson & Golland

Morphologyhttp://usuarios.lycos.es/lawebdelosfosiles/iPose

Recognition, detectionFig from Opelt et al.

Characteristic featureFig from Belongie et al.

Page 7: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

7

Part 1: 2D shape matching

Page 8: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

8

Recognition using shapes – (eg. – model fitting)

[Fig from Marszalek & Schmid, 2007]

For example, the model could be a line, a circle, or an arbitrary shape.

Page 9: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

9

Example: Deformable contours

Visual Dynamics Group, Dept. Engineering Science, University of Oxford.

Traffic monitoringHuman-computer interactionAnimationSurveillanceComputer Assisted Diagnosis in medical imaging

Applications:

Page 10: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

10

Issues at stake

Representation Holistic Part-based

Matching How to compute distance between shapes?

Challenges in recognition Information loss in 3D to 2D projection Articulations Occlusion…. Invariance??? Any other issue?

Page 11: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

11

Representation [Veltkamp ’00]

Holistic Moments

Fourier descriptors Computational geometry Curvature scale-space

Page 12: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

12

Page 13: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

13

Part-based

medial axis transform – shock graphs

Page 14: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

14

Matching: How to compare shapes?

Page 15: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

15

Discussion for a set of points

Hausdorff distance

Page 16: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

16

Chamfer distance

• Average distance to nearest feature

• T: template shape a set of points• I: image to search a set of points• dI(t): min distance for point t to some point in I

• Average distance to nearest feature

• T: template shape a set of points• I: image to search a set of points• dI(t): min distance for point t to some point in I

Page 17: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

17

Chamfer distance

Edge image

How is the measure different than just filtering with a mask having the shape points?

Page 18: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

18

Distance Transform

Source: Yuri Boykov

34

23

23

5 4 4

223

112

2 1 1 2 11 0 0 1 2 1

0001

2321011 0 1 2 3 3 2

101110 1

2

1 0 1 2 3 4 3 210122

Distance Transform Image features (2D)

Distance Transform is a function that for each image pixel p assigns a non-negative number corresponding to

distance from p to the nearest feature in the image I

)(D)( pD

Features could be edge points, foreground points,…

Page 19: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

19

Distance transform

original distance transformedges

Value at (x,y) tells how far that position is from the nearest edge point (or other binary mage structure)

>> help bwdist

Page 20: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

20

Chamfer distance Average distance to nearest feature

Edge image Distance transform image

Page 21: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

21

Chamfer distance

Fig from D. Gavrila, DAGM 1999

Edge image Distance transform image

Page 22: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

22

A limitation of active contours

External energy: snake does not really “see” object boundaries in the image unless it gets very close to it.

image gradientsare large only directly on the boundary

I

Page 23: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

23

What limitations might we have using only edge points to represent a shape?

How descriptive is a point?

Page 24: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

24

Comparing shapes

What points on these two sampled contours are most similar? How do you know?

Page 25: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

25

Shape context descriptor [Belongie et al ’02]

Count the number of points inside each bin, e.g.:

Count = 4

Count = 10

...

Compact representation of distribution of points relative to each point

Shape context slides from Belongie et al.

Page 26: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

26

Shape context descriptor

Page 27: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

27

Comparing shape contexts

Compute matching costs using Chi Squared distance:

Recover correspondences by solving for least cost assignment, using costs Cij

(Then use a deformable template match, given the correspondences.)

Page 28: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

28

Invariance/ Robustness

Translation Scaling Rotation Modeling transformations – thin plate splines

(TPS) Generalization of cubic splines to 2D

Matching cost = f(Shape context distances, bending energy of thin plate splines) Can add appearance information too Outliers?

Page 29: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

29

An example of shape context-based matching

Page 30: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

30

Some retrieval results

Page 31: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

31

Efficient matching of shape contexts [Mori et al ’05] Fast-pruning

randomly select a set of points Detailed matching

Page 32: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

32

Efficient matching of shape contexts [Mori et al ’05] – contd’ Vector quantization

Page 33: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

33

Are things clear so far?

Page 34: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

34

Detour - Articulation [Ling, Jacobs ’07]

Page 35: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

35

Inner distance vs. (2D) geodesic distance

Page 36: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

36

The problem of junctions

Is inner distance truly invariant to articulations?

Page 37: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

37

Page 38: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

38

Non-planar articulations? [Gopalan, Turaga, Chellappa ’10]

Page 39: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

39

Indexing approach to shape matching [Biswas et al ’10] Why?

Page 40: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

40

Indexing - framework

Pair-wise Features:

Inner distance, Contour length, relative angles etc.

Page 41: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

41

Page 42: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

42

Part 2 – Shapes as equivalence classes Kendall’s shape space

Shape is all the geometric information that remains when the location, scale and rotation effects are filtered out from the object

Page 43: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

43

Pre-shape

Kendall’s Statistical Shape Theory used for the characterization of shape.

Pre-shape accounts for location and scale invariance alone.

k landmark points (X:k\times 2) Translational Invariance: Subtract mean Scale Invariance : Normalize the scale

1, 1 1 T

c k k k

CXZ where C I

kC X

Some slides were adapted from Dr. Veeraraghavan’s website

Page 44: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

44

Feature extraction

Silhoutte

Landmarks

Centered Landmarks

Pre-shape vector

Page 45: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

45

[Veeraraghavan, Roy-Chowdhury, Chellappa ’05]

Shape lies on a spherical manifold.Shape distance must incorporate the non-Euclidean nature of the shape space.

Page 46: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

46

Affine subspaces [Turaga, Veeraraghavan, Chellappa ’08]

Page 47: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

47

Other examples

Space of Blur Modeling group trajectories etc..

Page 48: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

48

Conclusion

Shape as a set of points configuring the geometry of the object Representation, matching, recognition Shape contexts, Indexing, Articulation

Shape as equivalence class under a group of transformations

Page 49: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

49

Announcements

HW 5 will be posted today; On Stereo, and Shape matching Due Nov. 30 (Tuesday after Thanksgiving)

Turn in HW 4

Midterms solutions by weekend

Page 50: 1 2D Shape Matching (and Object Recognition) Raghuraman Gopalan Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park

50

Questions?