who gets to digitize whose knowledge?
Post on 05-Jul-2015
Embed Size (px)
- 1. Who Gets To Digitize Whose Knowledge?Diego Maranan email@example.com Faculty of Information and Communication Studies UP Open UniversityGS 197: Culture and its Global Entanglements University of the Philippines Diliman 10 December 2008CC-licensed photo from flickr.com/photos/amoration/3028563114/
2. cVideo text Title date DateReleased hh:mm:ss Length cLocationReleaseLocation cPersonDirector cPersonProducer cPersonDirectorOfPhotography cPerson(s) Actor_1, Actor_2, etc. text Description (video type) [feature length, documentary, short, commentary, etc] etcetc cPerson text Name cLocationPhysicalLocation_1, PhysicalLocation_2, etc cLocationVirtualLocation_1, VirtualLocation_2, etc. text Notes etcetc cWriting text Many things can be representedTitle cPerson cLocationAuthor and shared digitallyRepository cWriting WritingItCites_1, WritingItCites_2, etc. cVideo VideosItCites_1, VideosItCites_2, etc. (writing type) [Blog, Journal Article, etc] text NotesAboutThisWriting cLocation text Name URLWebAddress URLGoogleMapAddress text Description text Notes etcetc cExhibitionSpace text Name cLocationPhysicalLocation cLocationVirtualLocation text Notes etcetc 3. Sometimes we do it for the purpose of creatingnew worlds, new realities. 4. Other times, digitizing information simplymakes the information more easily shareable and archiveable... 5. ...which can be very useful. 6. (Quick aside: Knowledge versus information according to the field of Knowledge Management) InformationWhat is, Know what~ DataKnowledgeWhat works, Know howThe capacity to actFrom Serafin Talisayon's blog:apintalisayon.wordpress.com 7. Tacit versus explicit knowledgeapintalisayon.wordpress.com Digitizing information can play a crucial step intransforming implicit to explicit knowledge. 8. Can all tacit knowledge be explicitly documented and (subsequently) digitized?Maybe. Maybe not. But even if it were possible... 9. ... should all knowledge be digitized? When knowledge is digitized, what is lost? Transforming implicit to explicit knowledge is a kind of mapping. Digitizing knowledge is a kind of mapping. Mapping is often (though not always) a simplifying and distorting process. 10. quot;A Journey into Time Immemorialquot;, from www.virtualmuseum.ca In whose hands does the information lie? And do they have the legitimacy (the right, the accorded responsibility) to manage and transform thatknowledge? 11. Nancy Maryboy is a First Nations (Navaho) professor, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Northern Arizona University; Teaches an Internet-based course on Native American Astronomy She shares her people's ancient knowledge of the Navaho night sky and tells the stories of the constellations, their names, and how they came to be. 12. [During one conference], she was cautioned by one of the non-native experts that she ought to formally document[...] Navaho cosmology, since it would likely disappear in the future. 13. She gently made the point that certain knowledge must remain in the Navaho people's possession and that she was very confident that they could be entrusted with its preservations, as they had done so for thousands of years. 14. Digitizing information/knowledge is auseful endeavor. But we ought to think about who owns the knowledge and has the right to manage or transform that knowledge, as well as who is supposed to benefit fromdigitizing a particular body ofinformation/knowledge.This is all the more important whenthe claim of ownership is staked by individuals or groups who whosevoices have historically been underrepresented in the digitalworld and who place an importance on the medium through which that knowledge is transmitted. 15. All our knowledge brings us nearer to our ignorance [...] Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge? Where is the knowledge we have lost in information? TS Eliot, The Rock, 1934CC-licensed photo from flickr.com/photos/imuttoo/2631466945/